Impeachment a flop: It has another error: MPs who signed an erroneous document guilty of grave partiality -JVP M.P. Anura
(Lanka-e-News -08.Nov.2012, 11.30PM)
Following the Lanka e news exposure that the impeachment motion signed by 117 MPs against the chief justice (CJ) is a document tainted by irregularities and illegalities , just a while ago , we were deluged with information that this motion is drenched in more flaws. There is a most serious flaw in the indictment No. 11 against the CJ . In this indictment it is alleged that the CJ had subjected the Magistrate Kurupuge Beeta Aan Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi to undue harassment. This is mentioned at two places. Strangely , such a Magistrate by the name of Ms. Kurupuge Beeta Aan Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi is not performing such a Magistrate task.
It is Ms. Kurupuge Khema Aan Swarnadhipathi who is functioning as a Magistrate. Hence the name is completely wrong. Mind you this wrong is appearing in the impeachment motion in both languages. Legal luminaries emphasize that making a mistake in the name when filing charges is a very serious error in law. They say therefore that the 117 MPs who signed this impeachment have definitely misled the Parliament.
Anura Kumara Dissanayake the JVP M .P. and its politburo member speaking to Lanka e news said, if the 17 MPs have signed this impeachment despite these grave mistakes , they have violated Parliament regulations by signing an erroneous document and misleading the Parliament.
Otherwise , they have signed the erroneous document without seeing or reading it, is the necessary inference. In those circumstances tabling an impeachment motion against the CJ who is the third in the administrative hierarchy is a partiality that is very grave and serious , Anura Dissanayake pointed out.
(Lanka-e-News -08.Nov.2012, 11.30PM) Following the Lanka e news exposure that the impeachment motion signed by 117 MPs against the chief justice (CJ) is a document tainted by irregularities and illegalities , just a while ago , we were deluged with information that this motion is drenched in more flaws. There is a most serious flaw in the indictment No. 11 against the CJ . In this indictment it is alleged that the CJ had subjected the Magistrate Kurupuge Beeta Aan Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi to undue harassment. This is mentioned at two places. Strangely , such a Magistrate by the name of Ms. Kurupuge Beeta Aan Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi is not performing such a Magistrate task.It is Ms. Kurupuge Khema Aan Swarnadhipathi who is functioning as a Magistrate. Hence the name is completely wrong. Mind you this wrong is appearing in the impeachment motion in both languages. Legal luminaries emphasize that making a mistake in the name when filing charges is a very serious error in law. They say therefore that the 117 MPs who signed this impeachment have definitely misled the Parliament.
Anura Kumara Dissanayake the JVP M .P. and its politburo member speaking to Lanka e news said, if the 17 MPs have signed this impeachment despite these grave mistakes , they have violated Parliament regulations by signing an erroneous document and misleading the Parliament.
Otherwise , they have signed the erroneous document without seeing or reading it, is the necessary inference. In those circumstances tabling an impeachment motion against the CJ who is the third in the administrative hierarchy is a partiality that is very grave and serious , Anura Dissanayake pointed out.
