Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, September 30, 2018

Don’t Let Russia Get Its Way in Macedonia

Moscow wants this weekend’s referendum to fail, but Macedonians should vote to change their country’s name and join Europe once and for all.

A woman holds a “Yes” poster during a rally in Tetovo, Macedonia, on Sept. 27, before this weekend’s referendum on changing Macedonia’s name. (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
\A woman holds a “Yes” poster during a rally in Tetovo, Macedonia, on Sept. 27, before this weekend’s referendum on changing Macedonia’s name. (Chris McGrath/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.
BY -
 

On Sunday, Macedonians will vote in a historic referendum. The choice before them is clear: to modify the name of their country, as set out in an agreement struck with Greece this summer, and thereby cement Macedonia’s future in Europe; or to refuse to do so, and risk sinking back into the morass of Balkan ethnic strife and stunted political and economic development for at least another generation.

Russia desperately wants the latter. Why? Because a Macedonian rejection of the referendum means that Macedonia will continue to be blocked from joining the European Union and NATO. It means further progress in the Balkans—such as a Serbia-Kosovo mutual recognition deal—will be less likely. And it means the EU and NATO will remain inward-looking and bottled up inside current borders, rather than more confident and outward-looking.

Alternatively, a Balkans region that is slowly but surely becoming a normal part of Europe would upset Russia’s ambitions of keeping Europe divided into spheres of influence; of legitimizing nondemocratic, non-Western forms of top-down rule; and of creating opportunities for Russia to exercise influence through corruption, loaded energy deals, intelligence operations, and disinformation. Where Russia sees instability, insecurity, and weakness as opportunities, the EU tries to build stability, security, and prosperity.

For Macedonians, the outcomes of the referendum will have a real impact on daily life. A Macedonia that is part of Europe will provide a better future for generations to come. An isolated and weaker Macedonia will hold those future generations down.

 To Russia, that doesn’t matter. Macedonians are just pawns in a game to weaken Europe; if Macedonians have to pay the price by being poorer and less integrated with their neighbors and the West, that’s of no consequence.

Macedonians are justifiably proud of their history, culture, language, identity, and independence. It is understandable that they feel they should be able to choose their own name independently, without any reference to outsiders.

But if anyone understands history, it is Macedonians. Greece’s province of Macedonia has a history as well, and recognizing that today’s independent Macedonia is distinct from Greek Macedonia by changing the country’s name to the Republic of North Macedonia is a small price to pay for taking a historic step toward safeguarding Macedonia’s independence, sovereignty, democracy, prosperity, and security for generations to come.

I hope all Macedonians turn out to vote.  And I hope they seize this opportunity to secure their future, rather than fall prey to efforts aimed at keeping them stuck in the past.

Federal court blocks anti-BDS law in Arizona

View image on Twitter
Nora Barrows-Friedman- 28 September 2018
Citing First Amendment violations, a federal judge in Arizona on Thursday blocked enforcement of the state’s 2016 law that aims to thwart the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestinian rights.
The law required state officials to produce a blacklist of companies, organizations and other entities that are banned from state contracts because of their alleged support for boycotting Israel.
Arizona is now the second state, after Kansas, where Israel and its supporters have been dealt a major legal blow to their efforts to muzzle Americans who support Palestinian rights.
“A restriction of one’s ability to participate in collective calls to oppose Israel unquestionably burdens the protected expression of companies wishing to engage in such a boycott,” US District Court Judge Diane J. Humetewa wrote in Thursday’s order blocking the Arizona law.
“The type of collective action targeted by the [law] specifically implicates the rights of assembly and association that Americans and Arizonans use ‘to bring about political, social and economic change,’” the judge added.
A federal court heard arguments on the law in May.
Earlier this year, a federal judge blocked a state law in Kansas, citing similar concerns over free speech rights.
The Kansas law was amended last Spring so that it does not apply to individuals, but the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has said that it remains unconstitutional.

“No business”

Thursday’s ruling “supports the notion that the government has no business telling people – even people who contract with the state – what causes they can or can’t support,” said Kathy Brody, legal director of the ACLU’s Arizona chapter.
The ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the law last December, calling for it to be struck down for violating the First Amendment.
The suit was filed on behalf of an attorney who contracts with the government to provide legal advice to incarcerated persons in Coconino County Jail, according to the civil rights group.
The attorney, Mikkel Jordahl, told the ACLU that he is an active participant in a consumer boycott of Israeli goods and wishes to “extend his boycott [activities] to his solely owned law firm” and provide legal services to organizations engaged in boycotts – something a state contractor could not do if the law stood.
Grateful to ACLU client Mikkel Jordahl who challenged Arizona's unconstitutional anti-BDS law and kudos to the brilliant legal team who represented him: Brian Hauss, Kathy Brody, and Vera Eidelman. pic.twitter.com/2EdxKe1lUa
View image on Twitter
In March, the Council on American-Islamic Relations filed a second lawsuit against the state’s anti-BDS law on behalf of a UC Berkeley lecturer who was invited to speak at Arizona State University.
He was given a contract that included a clause requiring speakers to certify they are not engaged with the BDS movement.
The lecturer, Hatem Bazian, who refused to sign the agreement as written, was eventually allowed to speakand the anti-BDS clause was omitted.
Arizona is one of 25 states which have adopted anti-BDS measures, and legislation is pending in Congress.
In May, human rights activists celebrated the failure of a measure that would have punished supporters of the BDS campaign in Missouri.
The bill would have denied state contracts worth $10,000 or more to businesses and organizations that support the Israel boycott.
Activists said that the legislation’s failure was a direct result of months of grassroots pressure on lawmakers and testimonies during committee hearings.
Rights groups called the legislation “constitutionally indefensible” and “a McCarthyite political litmus test on any company or nonprofit organization that wants to enter into a contract with the state.”

Free speech victory in Germany

Meanwhile, in Germany, a court ruled that the city of Oldenburg unlawfully prevented a group from using a public venue for an event featuring BDS activist Ronnie Barkan in 2016.
The judge said the municipality in the northwestern state of Lower Saxony illegally interfered with freedom of assembly and freedom of expression.
The ruling was celebrated by BDS activists in Germany, who have been resisting government crackdowns on Palestinian rights activism and BDS campaigning.
German court rules that withdrawing public venue to inititiative by Oldenburg muncicipality was unlawful. The decision interfered with freedom of assembly & expression. Oldenburg has to pay costs of legal process. https://www.nwzonline.de/oldenburg/politik/oldenburg-israelkritische-initiative-bds-stadt-oldenburg-unterliegt-im-streit-um-versammlung-im-kulturzentrum-pfl_a_50,2,2544826972.html 
JUSTITIA! German court rules in favor of and freedom of expression!

Today the municipality of , Germany, lost a 2-year process  against @BDSini. This is a legal precedent in the German space, stay tuned.. there's more to follow...https://www.facebook.com/christopherbenkushka/posts/10217373109948153  pic.twitter.com/cfFpTLiHeC
View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Three years of Russian air strikes on Syria kill 18,000 people: Monitor


Observatory also says US-led coalition air strikes on Syria have killed more than 3,300 civilians

Two Russian Sukhoi Su-25 bombers at Hmeimim military base in Syria (AFP/file photo)

Sunday 30 September 2018
More than 18,000 people, almost half of them civilians, have died in Russian air strikes on Syria since Moscow began its game-changing intervention three years ago, a monitor said on Sunday.
An ally of Syria's government, Russia began carrying out bombing raids in the country on 30 September 2015 - more than four years into the conflict, AFP said.
Since then, they have killed 18,096 people, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. "That number includes 7,988 civilians, or nearly half of the total," said Observatory chief Rami Abdel Rahman.
Another 5,233 Islamic State (IS) group fighters were also killed in Russian strikes, with the rest of the dead including other rebels, Islamists and militants, the Britain-based monitor said.
Russia's defence commission published drastically different figures on Sunday, saying its "accurate" strikes had killed 85,000 "terrorists".
"All of the air strikes have targeted and are still accurately targeting terrorist targets," said commission chief Viktor Bondarev, quoted by the Russian Interfax agency. 
Human rights groups and Western governments have criticised Russia's air war in Syria, saying it bombs indiscriminately and targets civilian infrastructure including hospitals.
The White Helmets, a Syrian rescue force that works in opposition areas, said in a report released on Sunday that it has responded to dozens of strikes by Russia on buildings used by civilians since 2015. 
They included Russian bombing raids on 19 schools, 12 public markets and 20 medical facilities over the past three years, as well as 21 of its own rescue centres.  
"Russia has flaunted its disregard for agreements over safe zones, no-conflict zones, cessations of hostilities, and de-escalation zones by continuing with airstrikes on civilian spaces," the White Helmets said. 
US-led coalition figures
In addition to the Russian and Syrian air forces, warplanes from the US-led coalition fighting IS have also been carrying out bombing raids on Syria since September 2014.
Last week, the Observatory also said that US-led coalition air strikes on Syria had killed more than 3,300 civilians since the alliance began operations against IS targets.
READ MORE ►
The Observatory, which relies on sources inside Syria for its reports, says it determines whose planes carried out strikes according to type, location, flight patterns and munitions involved.
Another monitor, Airwars, estimated earlier this year the number of civilian deaths in the bombing campaign against IS in Syria and Iraq may be more than seven times higher than that given by the US-led coalition.
Investigations carried out by Airwars suggest that since August 2014 - when the campaign against IS was launched - until mid-February 2018, the coalition was responsible for between 6,137 and 9,444 civilian deaths.
As of February, the coalition had admitted to only 841 "unintentional" civilian deaths, a figure Airwars attributes to the group's failure to investigate more than half of 2,400 "events" referenced in relation to civilian casualties. The Pentagon updated that number to 1,114 last week.
"One significant reason for the gulf in numbers is that half of all allegations…have yet to be assessed by the coalition," Chris Woods, the head of Airwars, told Euronews.
He added that, as an example, the coalition would usually not count secondary deaths - such as those caused by a collapsed building - in their figures.
The coalition has denied the claims made by Airwars, saying its methods are unreliable.
More than 350,000 people have been killed and millions displaced since Syria's civil war started in 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-Assad protests.

Philippines Duterte admits ‘only sin’ is extrajudicial killings


000_1308XW-940x580
The body of an alleged drug dealer lies on the ground after he was killed by an unidentified assailant in Manila on March 23, 2018. Source: Noel Celis/AFP


1st October 2018
PHILIPPINE President Rodrigo Duterte admitted his “only sin” is the extrajudicial killing of thousands of people during his ongoing war on drugs.
Duterte made the confession during his speech criticising opposition leader Francis Pangilinan at an oath-taking ceremony in Manila.
“What is my sin? Did I steal money, even just one peso?” CNN reported him saying. “Did I prosecute somebody I sent to jail? My only sin is extrajudicial killings.”
Duterte has in the past acknowledged extrajudicial killings have taken place but denied they were state-sanctioned.
According to government data, more than 4,000 people have been killed in his anti-drugs campaign since Duterte came to power in June 2016.
But local and international human rights groups believe the true figure is closer to 13,000, many of whom were killed by vigilante groups.
Police have not accepted any wrongdoing, claiming those that died were resisting arrest. But Duterte pointed to corrupt officers possibly being behind the killings.
“Four thousand deaths. When? Where? How? What did they use?” Duterte said. He said “ninja cops”, or police officers involved in drug operations, may be responsible for these killings.
“They are the ones killing those who can’t remit to them. It’s an organised crime actually.”
000_1924IJ
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte monitors the path of Typhoon Mangkhut at the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) Operations Center at Camp Aguinaldo in Manila on September 13, 2018. Source: Noel Celis/AFP
In his speech, Duterte also lashed out at the International Criminal Court (ICC) which announced in February that it would be carrying out investigations into the killings and Duterte’s role.
“You are actually exercising functions that you are not supposed to do, (which) belongs to the government. At the very least, you are committing usurpation of authority,” Duterte said.
Following the ICC’s announcement, Duterte decided to withdraw the Philippines from the court but the departure doesn’t take effect until March 2019. The ICC does not have jurisdiction over non-member countries.
The Court has, however, said it will continue its investigation as it retains jurisdiction “over crimes committed during the time in which the state was party to the statute.”
Duterte has had a tumultuous few weeks. On Wednesday, he had one of his staunchest critics, Senator Antonio Trillanes, arrested. He also claimed there was an assassination plot against him.
On Tuesday, he told a state-owned television network that he possessed a recording provided by a foreign country that a group of politicians from the opposition had banded together with Maoist rebels and former military officials to oust or kill him.
Despite maintaining high popularity throughout most of his tenure, polls released Tuesday show Duterte suffered his biggest slump in ratings in the third quarter as public unease grows over rising inflation and cost of living.