Rights Issues Mar Sri Lanka-EU Trade
By Feizal Samath
Bernard Savage, head of the EU delegation to Sri Lanka and
the Maldives, says political differences do not affect trade. “There are no
specific irritants (at the moment) and I would like to stress that in the normal
run of affairs political differences do not affect trade.”
Savage
told IPS in an interview that the issue of withdrawal of EU trade concessions
was a specific case. “But, if you look at the broad spectrum of trade relations
… that was not affected by short-term considerations.”
However,
well-known human rights lawyer J.C. Weliamuna believes that trade and aid are
invariably linked to human rights and corruption – two sectors where Sri Lanka
has been asked to show tangible progress.
“What
is promised on paper (by the government) is exactly the opposite of what is
implemented on the ground,” the lawyer, a board member of Transparency
International, told IPS.
The
EU is among Sri Lanka’s largest providers of development assistance and has
allocated an overall sum exceeding Sri Lankan rupees 478 million dollars for the
2007-2013 period for projects dealing with water and sanitation, housing,
income generation, infrastructure, schools, health facilities, food security and
others.
“The
level of assistance for the next programme – 2013 to 2020 – will be more or less
the same. It won’t decrease,” Savage said.
Sri
Lanka had won generous tax concessions under the Generalised System of
Preferences Plus (GSP+) for the July 2005 – August 2010, but this facility was
withdrawn over unaddressed human rights concerns.
EU
investigations had found ”shortcomings in respect of Sri Lanka’s implementation
of three United Nations human rights conventions – the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, the Convention against Torture and the Convention on
the Rights of the Child.”
However,
it was widely understood that the concessions were withdrawn owing to Sri
Lanka’s failure to address alleged war crimes during the last stages of the
country’s ethnic conflict.
The
impact of lost EU concessions is now being felt with garments exports to Europe
dropping by 15-20 percent in the five months up to May, said Rohan Abeykoon,
chairman of the Sri Lanka Apparel Exporters Association.
Garments,
Sri Lanka’s biggest export item, account for more than 50 percent of exports to
Europe.
“It’s
not the job losses that we are worried about because there is demand for labour,
but lost contracts are affecting small and medium businesses,” Abeykoon said.
“Local companies are losing out while those with multinational connections will
shift production elsewhere.”
Abeykoom
told IPS that he has urged the government to reapply for the facility, though
there is no sign of that happening yet. “With regard to GSP + we have had no
request from the government for a new facility,” Savage confirmed.
Trade
unions are also backing the call for a revival of the concessions. Palitha
Athukorala, president of the Progress Union of Sri Lankan Apparel Workers, said
the government seems unconcerned and has made no attempt to apply for GSP
+.
“They
(government) should ask for it. We are badly affected as small factories are
closing and workers are losing jobs,” Athukorala told IPS.
Padmini
Weerasuriya, coordinator of the Women’s Centre, a non-government organisation
active in the country’s free trade zones, says there are no job losses owing to
the loss of GSP + concessions, though this may change.
“Our
members (workers) have reported a drop in orders which then affects other
incentives outside the monthly wage,” she said. Unions have already been
campaigning for decent living wages.
On
the political front, Sri Lanka this month did a major about-turn to invite the
U.N. Human Rights Council to visit the country to review the human rights
situation.
Earlier,
Sri Lanka had even refused entry to a EU team examining Sri Lanka’s application
for a renewal of GSP+ benefits.
The
government has prepared an action plan on human rights and sent it to Geneva,
five months after the U.N. passed a United States-backed resolution urging Sri
Lanka to address alleged human rights abuses.
The
March U.N. motion had called on Colombo to address violations of international
humanitarian law; implement the recommendations of a local commission that
probed the conflict; and encourage the U.N. Human Rights office to offer Sri
Lanka advice and assistance and the government to accept such advice.
Sri
Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa has repeatedly denied claims of large-scale
civilian casualties during the last stages of the battle against Tamil
separatist rebels that ended in May 2009.
Strained
relations with the West have forced the government to rely on allies in the
neighbourhood like China, Iran, Libya and India for war-related and development
aid.
Constant
international pressure and the March U.N. resolution – which was backed by
India, a long-time Sri Lanka supporter – has forced Sri Lanka to make
conciliatory gestures to the West.
The
respected Sunday Times newspaper said on Aug. 5 that the government’s decision
to implement the full U.N. resolution and allow a U.N. team to visit the country
would pave the way for a long-standing visit by U.N. Commissioner for Human
Rights, Navi Pillay, considered a vocal critic.
Weliamuna
said issues in which the international community is concerned – human rights,
declining rule of law, growing impunity and corruption – are relevant. “The
government knows it cannot continue in this manner and is trying to convince the
world that it has changed,” he said.
Abeykoon
says the devaluation of the US dollar in May, which pushed the rupee up to 130
per dollar, against 110 in February, has helped the garment industry. “If not,
our exports (to the EU) would have worsened.”
For
Savage, the GSP + is a “closed chapter”, using a phrase borrowed from Sri
Lanka’s external affairs minister Gamini Lakshman Peiris. “The fact is GSP+ was
withdrawn and Sri Lanka has not reapplied. We need to move on,” Savage
said.