Dispelling the myths of humanitarian aid
International Organizations and Civilian Protection by Sreeram Chaulia
Reviewed by Sudha Ramachandran
In 2009, the world watched in horror as hundreds of thousands of Tamil civilians in Sri Lanka's northern province were prevented by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) from fleeing relentless bombing by the Sri Lankan security forces.
Shocking images and accounts trickled out of the war zone of the government bombing homes and hospitals, and of the LTTE using civilian shields. These drew world attention not just to the callous treatment of civilians by the two sides but also the abject failure of the international community and humanitarian organizations to protect them.
Full Story>>>
====================================
Court of 'last resort' no threat to sovereignty: ICC president Sang-Hyun Song
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
- Chris Merritt, Legal Affairs editor From: The Australian July 15, 2011
That threat, if it exists, has had little impact on the 116 countries, including Australia, that have acceded to the Rome Statute that established the court. In theory, these countries have empowered the ICC to sit in judgment on the conduct of their armed forces.
Concern about the ICC emerged briefly last year during the furore over the military prosecution by Australian authorities of troops who had served in Afghanistan.
Some saw the decision to prosecute Australian soldiers in Australia as a way of ensuring they would never be brought before the ICC. Full Story>>>