Intervenient petitioners seek full SC bench to hear FR petitions on dissolution
Five persons who filed intervenient petitions against the 13 fundamental
rights petitions challenging the dissolution of Parliament by President
Maithriapala Sirisena on November 9, requested the Supreme Court today
through a motion to appoint a full bench to hear the said Fundamental
Rights (FR) Petitions.
The intervenient petitioners had submitted in their motion that they
requested under Article 132 of the Constitution a bench comprising five
judges or seven judges or a full bench to hear the FR petitions against
the Attorney General challenging the dissolution of the Parliament.
The intervenient petitioners who had made this request through Attorneys
Nilantha Wijesinghe and Atula de Silva were Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna
(SLPP) Chairman Prof. G.L. Peiris, Minister Udaya Gammanpila,
Wellawatte Jagath, Professor Channa Jayasumana and Attorney Premnath C.
Dolawatte.
They have submitted that the gazette issued by the President dissolving
the Parliament has made a tremendous impact on the society and what is
before the court is a nationally important Constitutional matter and as
such it is appropriate to appoint a bench comprising more than five
judges.
The three member bench of the
Supreme Court that heard the fundamental rights petitions filed by the
UNP, TNA, JVP, ACMC, former Parliamentarian Mano Ganeshan, Centre for
Policy Alternatives, Attorney Aruna Laksiri and the member of the
National Election Commission Professor Samuel Ratnajeevan Hoole, issued
an order on Tuesday staying the President's gazette on the dissolution
of Parliament and holding the general election under that gazette till
December 7. (Thilani de Silva and Ranjan Katugampola)
