Aren't Tamil interests served better by engaing with Lanka instead of boycott?

 Tuesday, 12 November 2013 

So the decision has been taken, the pm has made his move. How does one interpret this development? Well UPA baiters are already saying that it's a capitulation and a compromise on national strategic interests while others see it as Teh only move that an embattled pm had left.

There is another view, a far more cynical view that suggests that agreeing to call off the prime ministers presence in Colombo but making sure that the foreign minister leads the delegation and heads the Indian presence at Teh CHOGM summit, a seasoned congress has got exactly what they had hoped for??

Courtesy - http://www.newsx.com/