Tuesday , 19 February 2013
World Tamil Council have arranged a meeting at the British parliament on the forthcoming 27th, and the UN Human Rights Council's membership countries representatives which has acquired the voting rights will attend.
Government sector, opposition sector and British parliament members are invited for this debate was said by World Tamils Council Spokesperson
Deputy Prime Minister, Liberal Democratic party leader Nikkilek, External Affairs and Commonwealth Affairs Console Senior State Minister, Conservative party former Leader Feronaz Varshi, Opposition party leader, Labour party leader Ed Milliband, State Secretary for Energy and climate change and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs Douglas Alexander will address at the meeting.
Former External and Commonwealth Console Senior Minister David Miliband visited Sri Lanka at the year 2008 final phase of war, will share his opinions through video footage.
Eric Solkeim former Norwegian Minster and the main envoy for peace for Sri Lanka will address the event.
Tamil National Alliance leader R.Sambanthan, parliament member M.A.Sumenthiran, one of the members of UN Expert panel, South African Human Rights Organization Executive Director Jasmin Soohaa will also attend this occasion.
The preview of the war zone feature movie directed by Channel 4, will be telecast at the UN Human Rights Assembly during the event.
The Amnesty Council, Human Rights Commission and Global wide International Crisis Group will publish new reports and documents.
Parliament member Siza Enjikelana including African National Congress, members from the International Relations will attend the meeting.
Journalists from a significant TV channel from India are invited for the coverage of this event.
Editorial Tamil Guardian 19 February 2013
Justice and accountability will only be achieved through an internationally orchestrated inquiry. There is no historic precedent to a domestic inquiry achieving this in Sri Lanka. The state has a long and tortuous history of failed commissions, succinctly dubbed by Amnesty International, as ‘20 years of make-believe’ - that was four years ago. During this time, there has only been an increase in the country’s dogged evasive behaviour. As the High Commissioner's report highlights, the state's judicial system and law enforcement agencies do not have the credibility to assure justice or accountability.
All that has emanated from Sri Lanka is a prolonged and repetitive series of obfuscations and outright denial. The very notion of an investigation into abuses continues to provoke an unanimous backlash amongst the Sinhala nation. Spurred on by the masses, Sri Lanka has become increasingly hostile to actors that call for accountability, churning out the ‘terrorist’ label to slur not only Tamils, but non-Tamil critics of the state. This venomous invocation, accompanied by cries of usurping the country’s sovereignty, will continue to be deployed as a deterrent for any international measures towards accountability. Sri Lanka's wolf-cries of imperialism cannot be an excuse for inaction.
A negotiated political solution that addresses legitimate Tamil grievances has only become more elusive. The government continues to stall talks with Tamil parties, employing a misleading bombast of negotiation via the 'South African Initiative', which has beenslammed by Tamil parties, notably the Tamil National Alliance and the Global Tamil Forum as disingenuous engagement. Over a year later, the initiative has not yielded any tangible results, and it will not. There is no imminent solution to be found in South Africa. There can be no meaningful engagement when the Sri Lankan state's starting point is the complete negation of a Tamil nation, and the abject refusal to acknowledge the notion of Tamil autonomy, let alone the nation's right to self-determination.
Tamils are not viewed as equal citizens in the Sri Lankan state, but a minority, which if it knows its place, may be bestowed tolerance. Any state act, be it reconstructing a war-torn road or releasing Tamil students held under the notorious Prevention of Terrorism Act, is seen as a boon, with the Tamils expected to revere it as such. As the High Commissioner's report illustrates, this is not just the view of the Rajapaksa family, even civil servants reportedly saw the rebuilding infrastructure in the North-East, as an act of benevolence by the state, rather than a fulfilment of its obligations towards its citizens. Time and space will not alter this mindset, it will only give the state the opportunity to further entrench it into state structures.
The fourth anniversary of the end of armed conflict is dawning. The international community now possesses an impressive arsenal of reports, video footage and eye-witness testimony, and the High Commissioner's report is yet another welcome addition. The international community must now deploy it towards ensuring concrete and tangible action. Anything less than resolute will be rewarding Sri Lanka and granting them further reprieve - a concession that will not go unnoticed by other unruly states. More time spells more unrestrained Sinhala Buddhist chauvinism, and more space allows for uncontrollable impunity. Sri Lanka's macabre excesses and unruly defiances need to be reined in, swiftly and uncompromisingly.