Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, January 15, 2013


Situation Report By Lawyers Collective: CJ Remains The CJ, Mohan P Is Expected To Take Oath Immediately

By Lawyers Collective -January 14, 2013 
Colombo TelegraphJanuary 14, 2013 – 9.00 p.m – Colombo; 
  1. The letter of removal of the Chief Justice was received by her on 13th January 2013.
  2. The President has summoned judges of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court 13th, 14th   and 15th January respectively. There is no Constitutional tradition in Sri Lanka authorizing the President to do so. In the present circumstances, the Judges are compelled  to meet the President ignoring the constitutional tradition.
  3. The Bar Council of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) meeting held on 12thJanuary 2013 decided to make a final attempt to halt the impeachment process,  by sending  a BASL Delegation to meet the President. An appointment was given for the BASL delegation but prior to the meeting the President had issued the removal letter. Therefore, several members of the delegation urged the BASL not to meet the President as the mandate has expired. Nevertheless some members of the delegation had met the President at 11 a.m. on 14th January 2013, (also  attended to by several other lawyers/ politicians).  At the meeting the President had been very critical of the protests of lawyers and had also made false allegations that the lawyers’ who had protested had received foreign funds to do. The Presidential media unit  thereafter circulated a video clip prepared by them to all  electronic media institutions, which was telecast today. It contained damaging and adverse material on the unity of lawyers,  suggesting that the Bar has not been part of the protests. It has also failed to state that thousands of  lawyers who participate at the protests are active members of the BASL.
  4. The Lawyers’ Collective held a Press Conference today  and highlighted the following key points.
a)      The entire impeachment process was unconstitutional and the Hon. Shirani Bandaranayaka remains the Chief Justice. Whatever the decision she takes tomorrow (15th January)  the Lawyers’ Collective stands by her.
b)     The initial struggle by Lawyers led by the Lawyers’ Collective was to prevent the impeachment. The next phase would be a broader but long term struggle involving clergy, political parties, trade unions, intellectuals, academics, students and civil society groups.
c)      The Lawyers, Judges and civil society activists who have stood up for the Independence of the Judiciary and against the unconstitutional impeachment may be subjected to victimization in future. The Lawyers’ Collective along with its network would not hesitate in making appropriate interventions,  if such victimizations take place.
d)     The Lawyers salute the Chief Justice for her courage. The Lawyers’ Collective also commends those who took a public stance for justice courageously notwithstanding an unprecedented hate campaigns and threats,  unleashed by the Government.
  1.  Mr. Mohan Peiris’ name has been forwarded to the Parliamentary Council, which is expected to meet tomorrow (15th January) at 10.00 a.m. He is also expected to take oath immediately.
  1. Vicious hate campaign against the lawyers who stood up against the impeachment continues to date.  There is information that in addition to the state media, several groups connected to the government are  engaged in a defamatory campaign against identified lawyers, making their life and professional  practice vulnerable.

Appointment Of New Chief Justice Undermines Rule Of Law – ICJ

By Colombo Telegraph -January 15, 2013 
Colombo Telegraph“The appointment of former Attorney General Mohan Peiris (photo) as Sri Lanka’s new Chief Justice raises serious concerns about the future of the Rule of Law and accountability in the country2 says , the International Commission of Jurists. 
Mohan Pieris
Mohan Peiris has served in a variety of high-level legal posts in the past decade, always playing a key role in defending the conduct of the Sri Lankan government.
He served as Sri Lanka’s Attorney-General from 2009 to 2011. Since then he has served as the legal adviser to President Mahinda Rajapaksaand the Cabinet.
“During his tenure as Attorney-General and the government’s top legal advisor Mohan Peiris consistently blocked efforts to hold the government responsible for serious human rights violations and disregarded international law and standards,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Asia director.
“Mohan Peiris’ appointment as the new Chief Justice, after a politically compromised and procedurally flawed impeachment, adds serious insult to the gross injury already inflicted on Sri Lanka’s long suffering judiciary.”
The International Commission of Jurists, in its recent report on impunity in Sri Lanka, highlighted Mohan Peiris’ lack independence as Attorney-General, noting the alarming number of cases involving prominent politicians that were withdrawn during his tenure.
In November 2011, as Attorney General, Peiris told the UN Committee Against Torture in Geneva that political cartoonist Prageeth Ekneligoda, believed to have been subjected to enforced disappearance in January 2010, had actually left Sri Lanka. In June 2012, Peiris admitted to a court in Colombo that this claim was groundless.
“ICJ condemns this appointment as a further assault on the independence of the judiciary and calls on the Sri Lankan government to reinstate Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake. If there are grounds for questioning the Chief Justice’s actions, they should be pursued following due process and a proper impeachment process.”
NOTE:
In a statement today (Click here), Justice Bandarayanake strongly denied all the charges against her and asserted her status as the legal Chief Justice of Sri Lanka’s supreme court. She said: “I have suffered because I stood for an independent judiciary and withstood the pressures.  It is the People who are supreme and the Constitution of the Republic recognizes the rule of law and if that rule of law had prevailed, I would not have been punished unjustly.”