On Sri Lanka, UN
Pays Petrie Part-Time, No Check on Others'
Payments?
UNITED
NATIONS, October 19 -- Back in September 2011, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
announced that the UN's acts and omissions during the killing of thousands of
civilians in Sri Lanka in 2009 would be investigated by UN official Thoraya Obaid who would issue a report in four months
time.
By Matthew Russell
Lee
Nine months later, no report had been
issued. Inner City Press asked why not. Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky said for
the first time that Obaid had not been able to do the report, but that another
on-again off-again UN official,Charles
Petrie, was now on the case and would issue a report
shortly.
While Inner City Press has heard that the
report is finished -- being buried? -- it has not been released. And Inner City
Press learned that Petrie has another job, with the Norway government funded
Myanmar Peace Support Initiative (MPSI), which is also
controversial.
It
made Inner City Press wonder: how could Petrie do two jobs at once? How he work
for the UN and, essentially, for the Norwegian government at the same time, in
seeming violation of Article 100 of the UN Charter?
Inner City Press first wrote about
this; then when theIrrawaddy asked Petrie he
answered that he supervised three other UN officials -- which ones? Were they full time? -- and was paid "When Actually
Employed." This has been noted in Sri Lanka's Nation
on Sunday and Daily
Mirror.
Inner City Press asked, on October 11 and
then again
on October 12; spokesman Martin Nesirky said, "If I have anything further, then I will
let you know."
For nearly a week, Inner
City Press heard nothing back. Then on the evening of October 18, the UN
Spokesperson's office sent this:
Subject: Your question on Charles
Petrie
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM
To: Matthew Russell Lee [at] innercitypress.com
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM
To: Matthew Russell Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Mr. Petrie was appointed by the
Secretary-General to undertake an internal review of UN actions in the final
stages and aftermath of the conflict in Sri Lanka, a review recommended by the
Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka. Mr. Petrie
agreed to conduct this internal review on a part-time basis, with the
understanding that he would continue to serve on a part-time basis as
Coordinator of the Norwegian-led Myanmar Peace Support Initiative.
Under the terms of his contract, Mr.
Petrie is employed part time - on a "when actually employed" basis - as a United
Nations staff member. Accordingly, the Organization’s Staff Regulations and
Staff Rules are applicable only during the days of his service. When he is
actually employed by the UN, he is not performing other functions.
There remains a problem
with this formal answer -- it implies that as long as a person doing work for
the UN is called "When Actually Employed" -- even if reviewing the UN's own
inaction during a country's presumptive war crimes -- there is NO review by the
UN of possible conflicts of interest in the person's other
work.
That is, by this logic,
the person could be employed by the country itself, during the days or hours the
UN is not paying him.
Beyond
this structural problem, more concretely and pressingly, where is the report on
the UN in Sri Lanka?Watch
this site.