Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, June 6, 2019

Cocoa’s child laborers

Mars, Nestlé and Hershey pledged nearly two decades ago to stop using cocoa harvested by children. Yet much of the chocolate you buy still starts with child labor.
Behind much of the world’s chocolate is the work of thousands of impoverished children on West African cocoa farms.

  
GUIGLO, Ivory Coast — Five boys are swinging machetes on a cocoa farm, slowly advancing against a wall of brush. Their expressions are deadpan, almost vacant, and they rarely talk. The only sounds in the still air are the whoosh of blades slicing through tall grass and metallic pings when they hit something harder.

COMPASSION?

Why this insanity?




5 June 2019 

It is a state of mind and heart; one could say which is almost ‘unheard’ of these days!!! COMPASSION! Who in their right minds would want to exude Compassion, or even be known as a Compassionate human being??? However, if the terrorists who exploded those bombs had even a miniscule atom of compassion that terrible carnage and destruction would never have occurred!!! The irony and the incredible insanity that is absolutely impossible to comprehend is that they were all well educated, some married with families and mega rich!!! So, why did they choose to die then and go to hell when they could have lived a decent family life studded with all the luxuries money could buy, travelled the world, earned people’s respect and lived like kings!!! Why then did they choose death coupled with the infamy of killing so many innocent people??? More importantly, they could have helped their less fortunate brethren to live a better lives, had the glorious satisfaction of improving the quality of those poor lives and been rewarded for it both in this world and the next!!! WHY, WHY, WHY??? WHY THIS INSANITY???

Compassion has no bounds... 


Compassion motivates people to go out of their way to help the physical, mental or emotional pains of another human being!!! That Compassion is sadly lacking today wherever in the world you turn!!! For instance, look at the mega rich stars of the silver screen in India, planning and executing mind boggling weddings with receptions worth a king’s ransom!!! Take for instance, Priyanka Chopra and Deepika Padukone; Chopra especially seems to be on a never ending honeymoon and together with husband Jonas on an ever turning wheel of parties, met galas, concerts etc., without a thought for the less fortunate people of this world; especially in India, where there are countless destitute desperately poor people!!! At least in the world of Hollywood, we find some sympathy for abandoned children or children from poor countries being adopted!!! Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are shining examples in the number of children they adopted, Sandra Bullock, Madonna, Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise and more who I do not remember to name here; all with kind loving hearts open to embrace these children, even Elton John!!!

Helpfulness; a true compassion

Compassion involves allowing ourselves to be moved by the suffering of others, most altruistic doctors experience the motivation to help alleviate suffering and doctors with this attitude get overall results!!! Most qualities of compassion are governed by patience, wisdom, kindness and perseverance!!! We need to demonstrate warmth and the resolve to show compassion, because an act of compassion is defined by its helpfulness!!! Helpfulness is invariably the key component that figures in demonstrating true compassion!!! This is the Compassion all of us need to demonstrate to the Survivors of the horrible Easter Sunday bomb blasts!!! Quite a number of people have demonstrated a lot of warmth and care to those who are still struggling with their own sorrows and grievous losses!!! We will never be able to comprehend the depths of loss and unimaginable horror that these poor survivors have gone through; so let us try in the name of humanity to alleviate their sufferings both materialistically and emotionally!!! Often expressions of compassion are what matter; the fact that someone remembers, someone cares, someone is concerned is the greatest consolation we can give!!!

Thirst to kill innocents...! 


The Easter Sunday attacks are being regarded as one of the most sophisticated attacks in recent years. The bombs were all highly impact and were detonated at precise locations with impeccable timing, ensuring maximum impact and maximum casualties!!! Do we see even  a miniscule of compassion in this cold-blooded orchestration of killing, regardless of whom they killed??? I ask again, WHY THIS INSANITY??? Was murdering human beings their only goal and, if so, what purpose did it serve??? They, as the murderers, go to hell, the martyrs they slaughtered when they were praying on their knees, go to heaven!!! So what purpose did those senseless killings serve??? N O T H I N G! N O T H I N G! N O T H I N G!!! WHAT A FALLACY!!!

Attacks; result of social oppression? 


According to ‘FirstPost, ‘All over the world, the terrorist attacks by radical Islamists are immediately served with long and extensive excuses about how social ills, discrimination, poverty, lack of education, hardships and atrocities lead to terrorism. Even dreaded ISIS terrorists and their brides are painted by a section of media as the victims of torture and discrimination. Even in the Sri Lanka bombings, the left-liberal cabal had jumped in immediately to paint the attacks as a result of social oppression meted out by the Buddhist majority’ – what absolute absurdity??? What social ills and discrimination brought about the MILLIONS they owned and spent and still continue to spend on their atrocities??? What lack of education prompted Zahran to accept an Export Award from the Minister???

Shattered narratives...

The involvement of the Ibrahim family shatters all those narratives!!! They were mega rich, lived in luxury that most people could not even dream of and continued to carry out training, recruitment, logistics and planning involved in large scale terror attacks the likes of which we experienced ON EASTER SUNDAY!!!

It is time for a radical change 


The Sri Lankan attacks give rise to some very serious questions about the validity of the Government!!! In all fairness to him, the Prime Minister has shouldered the blame that the Government simply failed to act on prior warnings and intelligence reports!!! What right do they have then to stay in power any longer??? They have even accepted that the attacks were a result of security lapses on their part, having put the country at so much risk, having been responsible for such cruel deaths and countless suffering of survivors, left so many bereaved with loss of parents, spouses, children, could they dare to stay in power??? Not just the result of security lapses, but the involvement of the Ibrahim family takes this whole sordid episode to an entirely new dimension, an altogether new dimension; which we are going to have to investigate in-depth!!!

Vladimir Putin has said “To Forgive the Terrorists is up to God. But to send them to Him is Up to Me!” (Brilliant!) In the final analysis, ‘You can’t change how people treat you or what they say about you. All you can do is change how you react to it.’ IT IS TIME FOR CHANGE, RADICAL CHANGE!!! THE VOICE



Why we need to stand up for Earth defenders this World Environment Day


4 June 2019, 17:30 UTC
June 5 marks World Environment Day. Created by the United Nations to raise awareness of issues from air pollution to global warming, the day has grown to become one of the biggest platforms for advocating for all-important environmental causes.
While globally activism on the climate crisis have rightfully gained momentum, one of the still relatively over-looked facts is that people who are on the frontlines of these struggles –environmental human rights defenders—face the gravest risks to protect their homes and communities.
Who are environmental human rights defenders?
Environmental human rights defenders are people who speak up to protect rights associated to the environment, land and territory. They are often community leaders or advocates who seek to protect the rights and the well-being of their communities, especially by looking after their homes, air, water, land, territory and forests from destruction or contamination. Many of them are Indigenous People. While their stories are often told in local contexts, about how they are campaigning to protect their families and loved ones, their work concerns us all because it carries huge global significance. Take for example the Amazon rainforest, the lungs of the Earth, which for hundreds of years have been safeguarded by Indigenous Peoples and who are on the frontline of the battle to save it from deforestation.
Yet being an environmental human rights defender has deadly consequences, making it among the deadliest types of activism. According to the NGO Global Witness, in 2017, the latest year for which it has data, almost four environmental defenders were killed each week for protecting their land, wildlife and natural resources. In 2017, 207 environmental activists were killed. The vast majority of them hailed from South America, making it the most dangerous region in the world.
Global Witness reports that the failure of many governments and businesses to act responsibly, ethically and even legally was a major driving force behind a litany of crimes against activists.
Activists are at risk because powerful forces think they can get away with attacking, killing and criminalizing local protestors, believing the rest of the world will not pay any heed. That is why it is more urgent than ever that we show global solidarity and stand up for the environmental human rights defenders who are risking everything to protect people and the planet.
Today we highlight the stories of seven incredible environmental activists from the Americas who remind us of why we need to stand up for Earth’s defenders.
BERTA CÁCERES, COPINH (HONDURAS)
Berta Cáceres cofounded the National Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations of Honduras (Consejo Cívico de Organizaciones Populares e Indígenas de Honduras, COPINH) in 1993 to address the growing threats posed to the territorial rights of the Lenca communities and improve their livelihoods.
On 2 March 2016, Berta was shot dead by gunmen who entered her home in Honduras. Berta and COPINH were campaigning against the impact that an hydroelectric dam project would have on the territory of the Lenca People. This struggle led to Berta’s killing and remains a great threat to the life of any organization questioning the implementation of economic projects in the Lenca territory.
While some people have been found guilty for her murder, the Honduran justice system still must find all those responsible- not just those directly involved in the murder-to ensure that this crime does not go unpunished.

JULIÁN CARRILLO AND THE COLORADAS DE LA VIRGEN COMMUNITY (MÉXICO)
“We were born and raised in Coloradas de la Virgen, so our children are like shoots, the new young branches of a tree. And sometimes trees get old, they dry out, but the shoots are still there, they keep growing. Now I’m a little older, but my little branches are budding.”
Julián Carrillo was a leader of the Coloradas de la Virgen community. His job was to take care of the territory, the water, the forest and the wildlife. He had publicly denounced logging and mining by landlords in their ancestral land, as well as violence by criminal armed groups against his community.
Coloradas de la Virgen is an Indigenous community of almost 50 hectares, located in the municipality of Guadalupe y Calvo, Chihuahua, one of the poorest and most excluded regions in Mexico. More than 850 Rarámuri Indigenous people live there and consider this land to be part of their ancestral territory. They have been historically discriminated against.
On 24 October 2018, Julián Carrillo, was killed by unidentified armed men. The murder of Julián was a predictable tragedy. He reported attacks and death threats for years. His house was burned down, and he received threats from unidentified armed groups since 2015. Five other people in his family, including his son, were also killed.

PARAGUAY: AMADA MARTÍNEZ, INDIGENOUS DEFENDER OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY
Amada is an Avá Guaraní Indigenous environment defender from the Tekoha Sauce community.
In the 1970s, the construction of the Itaipú Binational hydroelectric plant, in the border between Paraguay and Brazil, forcibly displaced her community from its ancestral territory, putting their survival at risk. Since then, she has defended the right of her community to have a territory in which they can thrive in harmony with nature and has denounced the serious impacts of hydroelectric projects on nature and Indigenous Peoples’ lives.
On 8 August 2018, a group of armed men threatened to kill her. Amada was leaving the community in a taxi along with his seven-year-old son, his sister and two young nephews, when the vehicle in which they were traveling was intercepted by a pickup truck with the logo of the hydroelectric plant. Amada Martínez believes that the threat against her was due to her work defending Indigenous Peoples rights and the environment.
PATRICIA GUALINGA, INDIGENOUS DEFENDER OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY
“We are united and we will continue our struggle to defend Mother Earth.”
Patricia is an Indigenous leader of the Kichwa people of Sarayaku community. She defends her people’s rights to their territory and to live in a healthy environment in the face of damaging oil activities there. Patricia is also protecting the Amazonian environment and promoting sustainable development.
In 2012, the Indigenous Sarayaku community achieved a historic victory for Indigenous Peoples against the Ecuador government after reporting an oil concession that had installed explosives on their territory without consulting them.
In the early hours of 5 January 2018, an unknown man made death threats to Patricia and attacked her at her home in Puyo, in the east of Ecuador., The man shouted, “Next time we’ll kill you, bitch!” before fleeing.
Patricia and her family had to leave their home after the attack because the property owner “was terrified that something would happen to her.”
NEMA GREFA, INDIGENOUS DEFENDER OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY
“They threaten me with death but I’m not going to be scared by these words. As a Sápara woman, I am going to fight for my territory.”
Nema is defending the Amazon environment and her people’s right to protect their territory from the possible negative effects of oil activity.
After being legally recognized as President of the Sápara nationality of Ecuador in January 2018, her appointment was challenged by a group of people who Nema says are supportive of oil activities on the Sápara territory. Nema’s appointment was revoked in April 2018 as a result.
Later that month a video was shared on social media featuring a man armed with a spear, identified by Nema as belonging to the group who had challenged her appointment, issuing her with a death threat: “Those present here are united in rejecting her and are thus going to kill Nema Grefa; she has no territory.”
One year on, the Attorney’s Office has yet to open in investigation into the death threat.
On 19 October 2018 Nema was finally recognized as president but still faces serious threats to her life. In April this year, despite the Ecuadorian authorities’ promises to protect her and her family, unknown individuals forcibly broke into her home to steal two computers containing sensitive information on her human rights work.
SALOMÉ ARANDA, INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL AND WOMEN’S RIGHTS DEFENDER
“This attack is in retaliation for my fight to defend life and our territories from the threat of oil exploitation.” 
Salomé is an Indigenous leader from the Kichwa people who is defending the Amazonian environment and the right of women in her community to live in a healthy environment, free from sexual violence. Salomé is the Women and Family Leader in Moretecocha commune, Pastaza province.
Salomé has publicly denounced the possible environmental impacts of oil operations in the Villano River basin, Pastaza province, and the sexual abuse of Indigenous women that have occurred in this context.
In the early hours of 13 May 2018, a number of unidentified individuals attacked and threatened her and her family at home. Despite making a formal complaint, the Pastaza Provincial Attorney’s Office has yet to make any significant progress in this investigation. The authorities have not even offered her protection measures to address the risk facing her and her family.
MARGOTH ESCOBAR, ENVIRONMENTAL AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ RIGHTS DEFENDER
“We have to carry on defending, wherever we are in the world. The contribution we make to nature is the most valuable thing we can do for future generations. We are seeking the common good for all because that is the best legacy we can leave to humanity.”
Margoth has devoted her life to defending the environment and Indigenous Peoples’ rights.
In August 2015, Margoth was physically attacked by police officers at a protest and national strike called by the social and Indigenous movements in Puyo, Pastaza province. She was held on pre-trial detention for more than a week despite poor health caused by her injuries. She was charged with “attack and resistance”, which she was eventually acquitted of.  
In September last year Margoth’s house was set on fire, destroying all her belongings.
On 1 October 2018, the Puyo Fire Brigade Commander stated that the fire at Margoth’s house had been intentional. Margoth lodged a criminal complaint with the Pastaza Provincial Attorney’s Office to investigate the attack, yet no progress has been made in her case.
Margoth refused to join the country’s witness protection program because of her previous experience at the hands of the police: “I didn’t want to join the victim and witness protection system because I have no faith in the current government, I have no faith in the independence of the legal system in Ecuador, nor in the military or police forces.”

Arab States Foment Sudan Chaos While U.S. Stands By

American officials are unhappy over the role of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE but say their hands are tied.

A Sudanese protester walks past burning tires as military forces tried to disperse a sit-in outside army headquarters in Khartoum, Sudan, on June 3.
 
No photo description available.BY , 

Sudan’s descent into bloody anarchy in recent days has been partly brokered by Middle Eastern countries that are filling the power vacuum since the downfall of longtime leader Omar al-Bashir, leaving some U.S. officials frustrated by with Washington’s response to a massacre of civilians by Sudanese security forces.

More than 100 people were killed on Monday, according to civilian groups, when Sudanese military forces destroyed the country’s protest site and rampaged through Khartoum. Videos showed civilians walking through the streets and then being attacked by soldiers. Forty bodies were pulled from the Nile River, according to the Central Committee of Sudan Doctors, a professional association affiliated with the protest, after reports that soldiers from Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces paramilitary unit threw them in. One video showed bodies with rocks tied to their feet to make them sink in the river. There was no regular internet access in Khartoum on Wednesday, the third day of a web blackout.

After weeks of unbridled optimism following Bashir’s April ouster, Sudan is now on the brink of a total breakdown. The influence of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates is unmistakable. Military vehicles made by the UAE were identified by a New York Times reporter on the streets of Khartoum. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pledged $3 billion in assistance to Sudan, although an official at Sudan’s Central Bank said the Emirates initial deposit of $250 million had still not arrived as of last week. Rapid Support Forces commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagolo, known as “Hemeti,” and Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the head of Sudan’s military council, recently visited the Gulf states.

“UAE involvement increased a lot after the Bashir removal,” Salah Gosh, Sudan’s influential former spy chief, told Foreign Policy on Tuesday. Gosh was installed as head of Sudan’s intelligence service with the support of Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, according to current and former U.S. officials, and remained in Sudan’s government until resigning in the days after a coup against Bashir. Asked how the coup happened, Gosh said that Saudi Arabia and Egypt were not involved. The “UAE pushed [the coup] but [they] are not the main player.” Gosh did not provide more details when asked over WhatsApp, other than to say “many steps and insidents [sic] took place.” Phone calls to Gosh repeatedly dropped. Gosh’s account that only the UAE was involved in the coup is disputed by a Sudanese diplomat who spoke to Foreign Policy on the condition of anonymity and reporting from the Associated Press. Both said that all three Arab nations participated.

Gosh said he plays no role in Sudan’s military or political situation, but he made an ominous prediction: “I do not think it will be like what happened in Darfur, but [there] will be losses.” Gosh is accused of orchestrating many of those losses himself as a top official during Sudan’s brutal crackdown on Darfur, where an estimated 300,000 people died in what the U.S. government labeled a genocide.

Sudan’s uprising began in December 2018, when spontaneous protests over the anemic economy and low standards of living morphed into a nationwide strike that was organized by the country’s labor unions. More than a hundred civilians died during months-long protests that aimed to uproot not only Bashir, but also his entire system. Bashir was ousted in a military coup, but many elements of his regime remained in place.

The Sudanese military initially said that it wanted to hand over power to the civilians organizing the protests, but then military leaders dragged their feet. Protests turned the area around the military headquarters into a sit-in to keep pressure on the junta to transfer power. The sit-in was repeatedly attacked by Hemeti’s forces for weeks and was finally dismantled on Monday. Much of the city remains in lockdown, with Hemeti’s soldiers roaming the streets.

The hive of activity from Gulf countries stands in stark contrast with the United States, critics say. Several U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, complained that the Trump administration seemed to have no solid strategy on Sudan beyond sharply worded statements condemning violence and wasn’t convening enough regular meetings to coordinate between agencies such as the State Department, National Security Council, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Intelligence about the political situation in Sudan is slim. Some said the United States had no diplomatic plan for what happens at the end of June, the deadline the African Union set for the military to give up power. With a U.S. absence, the Gulf states are filling the void, said one U.S. official: “They are totally running the show.”

“The leaders and governments of Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Egypt do not share our fundamental democratic values, and their views on what should happen in Sudan diverge significantly from the policies the United States should be pursuing,” former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Johnnie Carson told Foreign Policy.

“The United States has been clear on its interests in seeing a transition to a civilian-led interim government in Sudan that can stabilize the situation, oversee a period of reforms, and prepare for free and fair elections,” a State Department spokesman wrote in an email response. “We have spoken out publicly and in private diplomatic conversations to ensure that international actors, including the [African Union] and the UN, are coordinating policies to achieve a civilian-led interim government in Sudan. ”

Egypt, Western officials and experts say, wants to hedge the rise of political Islam and democracy in Sudan because it threatens Cairo.

However, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are interested in keeping its military and financial partnership with Sudan. The Rapid Support Forces, under Hemeti, have supplied the two Gulf states with troops to fight in Yemen. Families of fighters in Yemen told Foreign Policythat they receive thousands of dollars each month to fight there. An estimated 8,000 to 14,000 Sudanese militia members have fought in Yemen, according to the New York Times. Saudi Arabia’s interests in Sudan are so intimate that Sudan’s former presidential minister, Taha Osman al-Hussein, is now the kingdom’s advisor on African affairs. Hussein reportedly fled Sudan in a standoff at the airport amid concerns that he was especially close with the Saudi government. During the holy month of Ramadan, Foreign Policy spoke with an emissary of the Emirati royal family, who said they were distributing sweets and money to people.

Despite the wealthy Gulf states vying for influence and the bloody crackdown, some experts still see hope for democracy in Sudan.

Suliman Baldo, a senior advisor with the advocacy group Enough Project, said violence won’t deter protesters. “The resolve of the Sudanese people to end three decades of repression and corruption will not be weakened–on the contrary, it is already fueling a rapidly spreading nationwide civil disobedience campaign,” he said.

Bidding farewell to my soulmate and cellmate

Portrait of a smiling man
Sameeh Hammoudeh
Sami A. Al-Arian -4 June 2019
There has been a big void in my heart since 25 May 2019, the day I lost a dear friend, brother, and “cellie,” Sameeh Hammoudeh.
Sameeh and I were in prison together in Florida for more than three years beginning in 2003, when the US government sought to send us to the gulag for the rest of our lives. While we had been friends and colleagues for more than a decade, our shared struggle solidified our brotherly bond.
When you live with someone in the same tiny space of less than 70 square feet for 24 hours a day for years on end, they eventually become a part of you, etched in your memory for life, a brother and kindred spirit.
I first met Sameeh in 1992 when I invited him to speak at a conference I organized on Palestine during the first intifada.
Already an accomplished scholar with a degree in political science from Birzeit University, he moved to the US to pursue graduate studies at the University of South Florida, where I was teaching.
He also worked as an editor for an Arabic-language journal called Political Readingspublished by a think tank in Tampa, Florida, called World and Islam Studies Enterprise (WISE), which was shut down by the US government in 1995 in a crackdown on Palestinian activism.
In prison, we talked endlessly about everything, laughed at the jokes our families would mail us and the stories they’d share during weekend visits. He was the first to hear and comment on the dozens of poems I’d written on spirituality, our struggle for justice, on Palestine and freedom.
When my collection of poems was published in 2004, I thanked him for being the first to listen to the poems and for his critique and support.

Dark days together

We were arrested in the aftermath of 9/11 when, under pressure from special interest groups and right-wing media, the Bush administration targeted us in a politically motivated indictment related to our Palestinian activism and charitable work a decade earlier.
During these dark days we became cellies, sharing a tiny prison cell together for more than 20 months when we were held in isolation in a federal penitentiary.
When we were occasionally allowed to go to a bigger cell for recreation, either in the early morning or late at night in order not to mix with other prisoners, we would throw a small rubber ball against the wall until we were exhausted, making up our own rules for the game. He was more fit than I was, and would almost always beat me. We would run and sweat and laugh and argue before going back to start or end our day together.
We prayed together each day. Along with the five daily prayers, we would also devote an additional hour to prayer each night. Over that period, we probably prayed more than 18,000 rakas, while reciting the entire Holy Quran many times over.
During the all-too-frequent times our cells were searched, we would be taken out in handcuffs and placed in a holding cell while the intrusive search was underway. Our simple routines would be interrupted, and trial preparation disrupted, as we realized upon our return to the cell that our massive legal documents were misplaced, missing or in complete disarray.
We would console each other, keep faith, control our anger and counsel patience. Sometimes during the search, we’d be detained in a room with a telephone. Because we were restricted to only one 15-minute call a month, we would take the risk and call our families while the search was underway.
One of us would dial the number without seeing the dial buttons as our hands were cuffed behind our backs, while the other was looking at the buttons to guide the caller to dial the right number. We’d then cover for each other by blocking the view from the guards while the other was talking to his family. Had we been caught we would have been severely punished.
We spent countless hours preparing for the trial, reviewing thousands of surveillance tapes, calls and CDs. We trawled through massive amounts of documents, records, summaries and testimonies.
Sometimes we would be reviewing documents in a sea of boxes in a bigger room in prison with an FBI agent observing us. Sameeh would often engage the agent and express his disgust at the politically motivated case, and his bewilderment that a country that prides itself on democratic ideals and principles would stoop so low as to manipulate facts and sacrifice justice to please politicians or foreign countries.

Refusing to bow

On more than one occasion, the government offered Sameeh citizenship, a job and the opportunity to finish his degree or anything else he wanted in exchange for flipping to their side and testifying against me.
He told them emphatically that he would rather stay in prison for the rest of his life than lie or harm another person for personal gain. When they upped the pressure by threatening to charge him and his wife on separate bogus charges related to taxes, he still did not relent or give in. His faith in God was infinite and his faith in our ultimate freedom absolute.
Every day, we would eat our three meals together on the floor, and during Ramadan, we would break our fast together. Some evenings we would spend hours trying to get hot water to have a cup of tea, a treat we were not afforded. Because we were considered “special prisoners” we were denied many rights and privileges granted to “regular” criminals, including getting hot drinks.
I would have my family send money to another inmate who would then buy tea from the prison canteen and occasionally smuggle a few bags to us. We’d then spend hours at the cell door trying to persuade one of the inmates cleaning the premises – called an orderly – to smuggle hot water to us in a plastic bag without being noticed by the guards. It would cost us one dollar per cup.
On those days that we were successful, we would – against the odds – feel a sense of accomplishment. One day one of the orderlies advised us that instead of waiting hours to get hot water we could simply light our own fire by using the batteries in our transistor radios. Even though he showed us how to do it in a few seconds, we spent hours trying to light one without success. We laughed endlessly at our ineptitude.
When the trial date got closer, we were separated. The government moved us from the federal prison 75 miles away to a local jail in Tampa, where I was housed in an emptied section of the women’s unit so that I would be totally isolated.
Yet, during the six-month trial, we would meet every day and ride the same van to court. As our hands and legs were shackled, we would assist each other since the marshals would not fasten our seatbelts while they drove recklessly. In one instance, upon a sudden stop, I flew from my seat, hit my head and landed on Sameeh’s lap. We were there for each other.
Two weeks before the verdict, I dreamed that Sameeh and another co-defendant were totally acquitted of all charges. In the dream, I was also found not guilty yet remained trapped in the courtroom unable to get out – as it happened, it took almost nine more years before I’d be granted my ultimate freedom.
In fact, the government did not obtain a single guilty verdict out of over 100 counts on any defendant. While I was acquitted on the most serious counts, the jury deadlocked on other charges with 10-2 in favor of total acquittal before the judge suddenly ended the deliberations when two jurors refused to deliberate and despite having four alternate jurors in the building.
Sameeh was acquitted on all counts.
When the verdict was read in December 2005 it was an emotional day, as we teared up when we said goodbye to each other knowing it would be a long time before we would see one another again. Sameeh asked for my blessings as he was going home, and I asked for his prayers. It would be 11 more years before we would meet again, in Istanbul.
But because of his immigration status, Sameeh had to leave the US and resettle in Palestine, where much of his family still lived. He was born in Bethlehem in 1960.

Inspiration and role model

Before our time in prison, Sameeh was one of the main people who helped me run a mosque and Islamic center that I established in 1987, after I joined the faculty of the University of South Florida a year earlier.
He also worked as a high school teacher and vice-principal in a private Islamic school that I founded in 1992 and managed for over a decade. We considered the school to be our most enduring contribution. He was an inspiration and role model to our students to whom he taught the Arabic language, religious studies and history.
It was a great treat for the generations of students who learned the history of Palestine from one so knowledgeable and passionate.

A historian of Palestine

As a historian and political scientist, Sameeh specialized in researching and analyzing Palestinian and Ottoman archives in Jerusalem and other Palestinian urban centers.
He published studies in academic journals and authored several books and chapters about major Palestinian political movements, intellectuals and leaders of the 20th century.
Just before the first intifada broke out in 1987, Sameeh was the first to write a detailed study on Sheikh Izz al-Din al-Qassam, the iconic religious leader who fought the British and armed Zionist groups in Palestine in the 1930s.
One of Sameeh’s last works, published in 2017, was Ottoman Ramallah: A Study in its Social History, 1517-1918. The groundbreaking piece received high praise from historians.
He also published several volumes on important Palestinian historical events and personalities, such as the Buraq Revolt of 1929, the Palestinian uprising of 1936-1939, life in Jerusalem during the British Mandate and World War II, and the memoirs of many Jerusalem political leaders including Daoud Saleh al-Husseini and Taher Abd al-Hamid al-Fityani.
He was also instrumental in organizing the archives of Birzeit University and the city of Ramallah.
Until 2015, Sameeh served as the editor-in-chief of Hawliyyat al-Quds, a peer-reviewed Arabic-language journal focusing on Jerusalem, published by the Institute for Palestine Studies.

Stolen years

Sameeh was an instinctively intellectual person, an avid reader and a serious scholar with an expansive historical memory.
He loved knowledge and was keen on acquiring it from any source. He inspired many of his students to do the same. He would engage any person, from a primary school student to a doctoral candidate, on any topic but especially history, politics, social sciences and Islam.
Education was his passion and making a difference in the lives of people intellectually and academically was his lifelong mission to which his many students would attest.
I had the privilege of hosting Sameeh twice in the past two years through the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), which I founded in Istanbul in 2017.
He addressed our students and faculty on Ottoman Palestine and the international relations between Islam and capitalism.
Sameeh finished his doctoral dissertation, submitted it to his committee and was weeks away from defending it when we were arrested at dawn on 20 February 2003.
During our trial in 2005, his PhD adviser testified that Sameeh was one of the most serious and decent people he had encountered, and his work was among the best he had ever supervised.
Sadly, even though he was found innocent of all the charges, Sameeh was not permitted to defend his dissertation or earn his PhD even after completing all of its requirements. It was another miscarriage of justice perpetrated by the malice or cowardice of a university and the haughtiness of an empire.
Even after his acquittal of all charges in December 2005, it was not enough that three years were unjustly stolen from his life, that he was denied his degree or that his wife and six children were deprived of his warmth and presence.
But because of sheer arrogance, it would take the US government another six months before allowing him to leave to the West Bank, in an effort to further punish him for their utter defeat at the hands of a jury after a six-month trial with over 75 witnesses.
While still in prison five months after his acquittal, Sameeh spoke to Democracy Now about his ongoing ordeal.
Once back in the West Bank in mid-2006, the Israeli authorities interrogated Sameeh and detained him, taking yet more time away from his family before he was allowed to join them again.

Legacy of love for education

Sameeh was a model husband, father and son. He was able to care for his elderly parents before they passed away a few years after his return.
His beloved wife and life partner of over three decades, Nadia, was always the bedrock of the family – pious, patient, kind, caring and supportive.
During the long ordeal, she was able to keep the family together and have their young children excel in their studies. Two years ago his eldest daughter, Weeam, received her PhD in sociology from Brown University and, following in her father’s footsteps, she has gone on to teach and lead research projects at Birzeit University.
Sameeh’s second daughter, Doaa, will receive her PhD this year from Oxford University. His other three daughters, Hanan, Alaa and Noor have all either received their master’s or bachelor’s degrees with distinction.
And this year, his youngest, Muhammad, received a full scholarship to an Ivy League school.
Sameeh was successfully able to transmit his love of and dedication to education to his children. When I talked to him recently, he was very proud of his children’s accomplishments.
Even though he knew that his days were numbered, Sameeh asked me during our last phone call a few days before he passed away to get him books from Istanbul that were not available in the West Bank.
He reminded me of a saying by the Prophet Muhammad – peace be upon him – “If the Day of Judgment is about to take place and there is a seed in your hand, go ahead and plant it.” This was Sameeh. He was faithful and devoted to knowledge and scholarship to his last breath.
I bid my friend and brother farewell. A courageous, generous, patient, calm, pious, decent, peaceful and loving soul.
Palestine has indeed lost one of its most loyal and devout sons. He had several unfinished and unpublished projects that I hope his students can carry on and complete.
Despite his sudden departure, he has undoubtedly left his indelible mark on Palestine and beyond. May God have mercy on his soul, and may he reside in the highest levels of Heaven.
As the Islamic saying goes, “Our eyes are weeping, our hearts are heavy and for your loss, Abu Muhammad, we are saddened. To God we belong and to Him is our return. There is no power or strength except that of God, the Most Great, the Most High.”
Sami Al-Arian is director of the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA) at Istanbul Zaim University in Turkey. Dr. Al-Arian was an academic, civil rights advocate and Palestinian activist in the US for more than 30 years. Along with Sameeh Hammoudeh, he was indicted in 2003 by the US government, and tried in 2005 on terrorism-related charges without reaching a single guilty verdict after a six-month trial.
He spent more than 11 years, from 2003 to 2014, between prison and house arrest until he eventually was forced to relocate to Turkey in 2015 after living four decades in the US.

Cruel, and no deterrent: why Australia’s policy on asylum seekers must change


June 4 at 9:33 PM
THE Coalition’s election victory on May 18 had an immediate psychological effect on the refugees on Manus Island, with reports of several people attempting suicide.
Two class-action lawsuits currently before the High Court allege “torture”, “persecution” and “other inhumane acts” in Australia’s offshore detention centres. This action follows an action for damages in 2018 that the federal government settled for A$70 million, effectively admitting that the claims of mistreatment were well-founded.
The Iranian-Kurdish journalist and poet Behrouz Boochani, who has been detained on Manus for six years, has borne witness to a cruel system in his book, No Friend But the Mountain. Written secretly on a mobile phone, the book has won a swag of major Australian literary awards.
As a result of the testimonials of Boochani and others, the terrible conditions on Nauru and Manus are well-known. There are regular reports of physical and mental illness due to unsanitary conditions, cruel treatment and hospitals with no capacity to deal with the extent and severity of the health crisis among the refugee populations.
These reports reinforce the underlying cruelty of subjecting innocent human beings to indefinite and arbitrary detention in the first place. And to what end?

There is no justification for offshore detention

For many years, there has been no justification for the detention of asylum seekers on Manus and Nauru.
The original justification of deterring others from making the dangerous journey from Indonesia to Australia carries no weight. The point has been well and truly made that attempting to reach Australia by boat is a futile exercise. In the words of the allegations in the class action, the journey will result in years of:
…arbitrary, indefinite detention in tents, barrack-style buildings, or small, hastily constructed dwellings where living conditions lead to poor health […] physical, sexual and psychological abuses, [and] systemic mental distress.
The government claimed that the medivac law passed in February risked a new wave of boat arrivals and spent over A$180 million reopening the Christmas Island detention centre in preparation for new arrivals. The government has since committed to closing Christmas Island again. The expense involved in this political exercise is staggering, with absolutely no benefit to the taxpayer.
There has also been no new wave of boat arrivals. Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack revealed Thursday that a boat from Sri Lanka had been intercepted near Christmas Island this month. However, the details of who was on board, and why the boat was in Australian waters has not been made publicly available.
There will always be the occasional refugee boat arriving Australian waters for a variety of reasons, but it is important to distinguish these isolated occurrences from a reigniting of the people-smuggling trade.
manus
Around 600 refugees remain barricaded inside Manus Detention Centre after authorities closed the camp on Tuesday. October 31, 2017. Source: Twitter
It’s high time the government ceased linking detention on Manus and Nauru to stopping the boats. The evidence does not stack up. As I, and others, have argued previously, the experience during the Howard years suggests that simply the possibility of offshore detention is a sufficient deterrent.
When the government settled asylum seekers on Nauru in Australia and New Zealand from 2002-04, without dismantling the offshore detention regime, asylum seekers did not begin arriving by boat.
Most asylum seekers in Indonesia are registered with the UNHCR and are waiting for resettlement through the UNHCR process. Their situation is admittedly desperate. Nonetheless, when interviewed after the passing of the medivac law, asylum seekers in Indonesia testified that they did not see taking a boat to Australia as an option.
It’s important to remember that asylum seekers have done nothing wrong in seeking our protection. Australia is a signatory to the UNHCR Refugee Convention, which establishes a responsibility to protect people who arrive on our border seeking protection. If offshore detention can be justified as deterrence at all, it must surely be kept to the bare minimum, in the context of our protection obligations.
Long-term detention is simply cruel and rightly labelled a “crime against humanity”.

Alternatives to detention

If there is even a remote possibility of a boat arriving in response to resettling refugees from Manus and Nauru in Australia and New Zealand, the government has many deterrence strategies at its disposal.
One novel strategy that avoids the need for offshore detention is Labor’s 2011 Malaysia arrangement. The deal was a simple one. In exchange for the transfer to Malaysia of 800 asylum seekers who arrived in Australia by boat, Australia would provide financial assistance to Malaysia and resettle 4,000 UNHCR-recognised refugees on top of existing commitments to resettle refugees from the region.
2017-01-12T144627Z_2022817816_RC1B76AE5490_RTRMADP_3_HUMANRIGHTS-REPORT-AUSTRALIA-PAPUA-e1494917966862
Refugee advocates hold placards and banners during a protest in central Sydney, Australia, in 2016 calling for the closure of the Australian detention centres in Nauru and Manus Island. Source: Reuters/David Gray
An important part of the arrangement was that those asylum seekers returned to Malaysia would not be penalised, and would be provided with housing, the right to work, and access to education for children.
The arrangement would act as an effective deterrent to people taking a boat to Australia to seek asylum because their expensive and dangerous journey would just result in their return to Malaysia. The Malaysia arrangement had the benefit of refocusing Australia’s response to asylum seekers and drawing in our neighbours to a regional response.
It’s critical that the Australian government take a new direction in refugee policy and move beyond its tired and false rhetoric of deterrence as a justification for detaining refugees on Nauru and Manus.count
Alex Reilly, Director of the Public Law and Policy Research Unit, Adelaide Law School, University of Adelaide
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.