Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, May 4, 2019

Hemasiri Will Be Arrested: Sirisena Reiterates To Find Scapegoat For Easter Sunday Massacre

Fernando
President Maithripala Sirisena has reiterated to loyalists at an event held on May Day that he would be taking steps to arrest former Secretary to the Ministry of Defence Hemasiri Fernando and IGP Pujith Jayasundara for their security failures that he claims led to the Easter Sunday bombings killing 250 people.
Speaking with loyalists after a May Day event at the Sri Lanka Foundation Institute on 1st May President Sirisena said that he had received the interim report by a special investigation committee headed by sitting supreme Court Judge Vijitha Malalgoda.
This is reiterating what the President said to security officers at the Defence Ministry two days ago even before he had received the interim report from the committee investigating security lapses that led to the bombings. The statements by the head of state who continues to desperately seek a scapegoat even though he has maintained full control of the entire security apparatus since October 2018 indicate that he was planning to put the entire responsibility for the attacks on the two officials and wipe his hands clean of responsibility.
Colombo Telegraph learns that Fernando is unwell and may seek medical treatment even as the first citizen of the country continues to blame him for the cold blooded murder of 250 people in order to protect himself and his pet police official SDIG Nilantha Jayawardane who heads the State Intelligence Service.
Colombo Telegraph has already revealed that Jayawardne briefed Sirisena on the intelligence reports about the impending suicide attacks on at least three occasions. The SIS head has also given testimony to the special investigative panel. However according to sources SDIG Jayawardane has tried to deflect blame on to the former Defence Secretary for the security lapses while whitewashing President Sirisena.
“They will protect each other,” said a Government official “Nilantha knows he told the president. The President knows Nilantha briefed him. Obviously the two of them cannot rat each other out so someone else has to be the fall guy,” the official said adding that the President’s actions were morally disgusting. According to the official the President was aware of the threat as early as 10 April when he was addressing a public gathering and seemed nervous to remain very long at the meeting. He seemed anxious and ill at east. Sources said the president may also have taken a longer holiday overseas in the belief that he was the actual target of the suicide attacks.
After Sirisena’s unconstitutional effort to make Mahinda Rajapaksa Prime Minister was defeated in December, he refused to give the Police Department and the Law and Order Ministry back to the UNP. To date he holds the police Department under his defence ministry unconstitutionally since the constitution as amended by the 19th Amendment only permits him to hold three ministries – Defence Environment and Mahaweli. However illegally Sirisena moved to gazette the police department under his defence ministry. The UNP and its Prime Minister has failed to resist this move or challenge the President’s unconstitutional actions in Court for the past six months even after the political crisis ended. Which these irresponsible and incompetent actions by the Prime Minister have been widely condemned by the public at large, the responsibility has to be borne by the President who has jealously guarded his Minsitry fo Defence and access to high level security officials and intelligence agencies refusing toe allow his prime minister and even the IGP to even attend National Security meetings even though the composition of the NSC includes both the PM and the Head of the Police.

Read More

Archbishop wants All Party Govt to resolve issue


GAGANI WEERAKOON-MAY 05 2019

Archbishop Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith said that he was personally unimpressed with the security measures taken by the Government since the 21 April Easter Sunday blasts. He warned that if the current regime does not have a stronger framework to combat terror, it will be impossible to contain the masses in the country in the future.

He said that the time has arrived for all political leaders to reach a consensus and map out a joint policy in connection with national security, if the country is to come out of its abyss after reeling from the Easter Sunday attacks in Colombo, Negombo and Batticaloa.

Furthermore, the Archbishop of Colombo and the leader of the country’s Roman Catholic Church also requested the Government not to reopen schools nationwide till it could guarantee full time security to students and teachers alike.

He made these comments during a media briefing held at the Archbishop’s House in Colombo recently.

 “When the country is still reeling from the Easter Sunday attacks and yet struggling to come to grips with their day-to-day lives, it is the duty of political leaders not to indulge in blame games or waste time by reminding what took place in the past.

 Hence, it is their responsibility to put aside their political differences and to find solutions to the issue of national security and take action to rid the country of this pitiful state. However, I cannot see any measures being taken towards it by those entrusted with such tasks.

These politicians are once again playing their favourite blame game and as a result the country and the people are continuing to suffer. At this juncture we do not need polls. Keep all of that aside for the moment. The time has come for all of us to consider the plight of this nation.

Hence, I call upon all political parties in this country to form an All Party Government to resolve this issue if the need is for that. I also urge the President, the Prime Minister, the Opposition Leader and other political leaders to put aside their differences and to map out a policy towards ensuring that national security is not compromised in this country at any stage in the future.

There is also tension among the public regarding various statements made by various MPs. The people are yet to be convinced that the country’s political leaders are attempting to resolve this issue by working together. They are only interested in scoring points, both personally and for their respective political parties. We cannot be content with the manner in which measures are taken to ensure national security.

 We cannot see any coordination in the security measures. We also feel that instead of such measures heading in a certain direction, they are just carrying out the tasks for the sake of doing it. Daily,
places are continuing to be searched and those places are being inspected only after being tipped off.

 All areas that were subjected to these attacks have to be searched thoroughly. We also feel house to house searches have to be carried out and each occupant’s authenticity has to be verified and if there are any illegal weapons those must be taken into custody and they should be grilled. It has to be unearthed as to who is behind these heinous acts of crime.

 Who brought these explosives, who gave support to these terrorists and they too should be questioned. We also have suspicions that some of those behind these bombings may have even fled the country by now. They have located swords, bombs, guns, and many such items from various locations. How many could still be there which the Security Forces have not been able to locate?

Hence these probes have to be carried out in a more detailed and thorough manner. They have to be conducted as on another occasion of the country waging a war. It is futile to drag these probes based solely on information that is collected daily. The Vesak Festival is coming and the people tend to converge in large numbers at such events throughout the country.

And if by some chance another attack were to take place during that time, the maintenance of national security will become a serious issue. The President has already formed a PCol to probe the Easter Sunday blasts. However, I am still in the dark whether those in the PCol had even begun their deliberations or any evidence has been sought from witnesses etc.

 I have my suspicions whether this PCol also will suffer the same fate like each of its predecessors. We are yet to seek the reports compiled by those previous PCols. The best example is the probe conducted by the PCol into the death of Roshen Chanaka who died from a shooting inside the Katunayake FTZ a few years ago. We are yet to see that report. Each of these incidents which took place in the past could always occur in the future.

For these reasons this report is needed. And we also need to know more about this PCol which is probing the Easter Sunday attacks. When appointing officials to such Commissions many retired officers are appointed. Those that should be appointed are those skilled and knowledgeable in the subject. Also we urge the Government if it needs to appoint a board comprising religious leaders to monitor the activities of officials of the PCol. We will support such endeavours.

We could only mete out justice to the scores of lives lost through the Easter Sunday carnage, by taking concrete measures to prevent such devastation from taking place at any time in the future. I make bold to say that if there is no formidable security network it will be impossible to contain the masses from rising against the Government.

 That is because we cannot be trotting out lies to the people day in and day out and attempt to tell them to remain calm and collected. There are also reports that some of those behind the carnage are fleeing the country. Do not allow them to flee. Also even if an MP or a Cabinet Minister is behind these attacks please apprehend them and grill them.

That is what the public expect from the Government. At a time when people’s feelings are running high, we cannot allow those with vested interests to destabilise the country further and place it in more chaos. The Buddhist monks, the Mowlawi’s, and Hindu priests, we are all standing together to make this request. If these requests are not fulfilled we will be forced to step in to the streets.

To oppose the actions of the Government we will be marching right at the front. We finally request the Government to implement the law without any fear or favour without leaving room for us to take the law into our own mitts.”

Speaking at the briefing Chief Prelate of Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha, Most Ven. Ittepane Dhammalankara Thera said, “The Cardinal had already taken the lead to pacify the nation in the aftermath of the Easter Sunday blasts.

 We all are in debt to him for the leadership he had shown at this critical time for this country.

However, the same cannot be said of the conduct of the Government in the wake of these attacks. We are not at all content with the actions taken by the Government.

 We intend to discuss these issues again and again. When the whole country is attempting to join forces in fighting terrorism and to root it out, it is nothing but despicable to find some within the Government still continuing to play the putrid blame game even when scores had died and hundreds of others had been wounded. We cannot see those in the topmost positions of the Government taking decisions jointly as they are divided politically to the core.”

The conduct of Cardinal Ranjith in the aftermath of Easter Sunday carnage is commendable. It was his timely and wise intervention to calm the people that prevented another dangerous bloodshed. With this, there were calls for the Government to increase security measures to protect the life of the Cardinal.

It was later reported that Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and the Government took immediate measures to provide a bullet-proof vehicle to the Archbishop.

Cardinal Ranjith on Tuesday (30) said that he had turned down accepting a bullet-proof vehicle which had been given for his safety by the Government.

Addressing media at the Bishop’s House, he said that he had informed Parliamentary backbencher Kavinda Jayawardena, who insisted that he should be provided with such a vehicle, to ensure his safety while travelling, that he usually depended on the vehicle assigned to him by security personnel. “I do not know whether it is bullet-proof or not.”

Observing that although he was able to provide for his safety, he questioned as to who was going to provide for the safety of the people.

Praising Archbishop Ranjith for his leadership during these trying times, former Leader of the Jathika Hela Urumaya, Ven. Dr. Omalpe Sobhitha Thera said that the Cardinal had placed himself in the line of danger in a bid to ensure the safety of the Catholics and maintain peace amongst the ethnic groups despite the recent terror attacks on three Catholic churches

The monk said that he wished the same could be said about the politicians of the country. “They are the first to want protection,” he said, pointing out that the politicos had expressed fear to go to Parliament.

In which case, they should either stay at home or keep the doors of the Parliament locked, he observed.

Petty explanations

Following Easter Sunday’s carnage not only was a political blame game started but most of the suspects that were taken into custody were linked to top politicians. Amongst those on the top of the list includes close associates of Minister Rishad Bathiudeen, Eastern Province Governor M.L.M. Hizbulla, Western Province Governor Azath Salley and UNP MPs M.I.M. Mansoor and Mujibar Rahuman. On the other hand, Muslim Affairs Minister Abdul Haleem was accused of permitting over 400 madrasa schools being built and another couple of dozen mosques.

Several stocks of swords too were found in mosques especially in the heart of Colombo.

According to Minister Haleem, recent cache of swords and knives found in mosques was to clear the overgrown shrubs surrounding compounds of mosques.

“It is possible that certain mosques would have kept weapons and other sharp objects to clean the yards and surrounding shrubs around certain religious places,” he claimed.

This was in response to journalists’ queries as to why certain mosques had amassed weapons such as swords and other sharp objects. “Most mosques have graveyards around them and some of these mosques could have a lot of shrubs and weeds growing in their yards, so it’s possible that they use these objects to clean up these areas,” claimed Haleem.

When queried by journalists as to why some of these places of worship were found keeping uniforms resembling Army camouflage uniforms, he claimed that he had seen the suspects involved claim to the Media that these uniforms were for re-selling purposes.

“We didn’t know about such things other than from the Media. We also saw a person in charge of a particular mosque saying these uniforms were for re-sale purposes and even showed receipts,” he added.

Meanwhile, releasing a statement, the Ministry of Muslim Religious Affairs has asked the Muslim community to cooperate with the necessary security measures implemented by the Government by avoiding different types of face covering veils such as the Niqab and the Burqa.

Meanwhile, Rishad Bathiudeen who is alleged to have close links with many of the suspects, including the arrested spice tycoon, left the country on Friday night around 7:30 p.m. to Muscat on SriLankan flight UL-205.

It is said that the Minister met both Prime Minister Wickremesighe and President Sirisena separately before embarking on the journey.

Officials engaged in investigations are under political pressure to release suspects even before the interrogations begin. Even though there are provisions under Emergency Regulations to detain a suspect for 90 days, we are forced to release many of them even before 24 hours lapsing.

The Gnanasara factor


It was in this context General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) organisation, imprisoned monk Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera claimed that terrorists are planning to carry out suicide attacks on some 50 odd temples throughout the country.

The imprisoned monk, Gnanasara Thera was produced at the Homagama Court on Monday (29) in connection with his Contempt of Court case.

After the hearing of the case the monk, before boarding the Black Maria, to be taken back to prison, made a special comment to the press.

He said, “There is no need for me to utter anything. There is a threat until the end of the Vesak and Poson Festivals. Do not allow such events to be marked on a grand scale in Sri Lanka. The terrorists are planning to carry out suicide attacks on some 50 odd temples throughout the country. Those in need of such information can come to the Prison Department and see me.”

The following day, the SLFP urged the authorities to obtain information from incarcerated General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena, Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera in connection with his claim that another terror attack targeting temples island-wide was in the offing.

UPFA Parliamentarian Thilanga Sumathipala said the Government should seek Gnanasara Thera’s advice and prevent possible bomb attacks at least in the future.

Addressing media at SLFP headquarters, Sumathipala claimed that most of the predictions made by the incarcerated monk about Islamist extremist attacks had come true and therefore attention should be paid to what he says. He added that the monk had made these statements having over 15 years of experience in the field.

“So, as a nation, it is a shame that a monk of his calibre has been imprisoned.  These announcements made by the monk are timely and there is time to prevent those alleged attacks by meeting him. He has made an open invitation to meet him and get information about attacks and plots,” he added.

Sumathipala emphasised that no one should undervalue President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision about anything at this juncture as terrorists could take advantage, adding that the President’s decision to change some people holding top positions in the Defence Ministry and others were on track and that he had selected the suitable persons to fill the posts.

“The President was helpless and couldn’t sack IGP Pujith Jayasundara even though he was in the wrong. And that is why the President appointed an acting IGP and the incumbent IGP has been sent on compulsory leave with immediate effect over inquiries into the Easter Sunday attacks,” he added.

Interestingly, a team of Intelligence and CID officers have reportedly visited the Prison Hospital to meet the General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena, Ven. Gnanasara Thera to obtain details about the activities of Islamist extremists in Sri Lanka.

Monks attached to the BBS organisation said Ven. Gnanasara Thera had been speaking about Islamic extremism in Sri Lanka since 2014.

Many people dismissed his claims but now everyone knows that what he said was true, the monks said.

They also requested that Gnanasara Thera be pardoned, so that his knowledge on Islamic extremism in Sri Lanka could be utilised to wipe out the Islamic State (IS) from the country.

SRI LANKA ARRESTS REUTERS JOURNALISTS OVER ‘TRESPASS’



Sri Lanka Brief03/05/2019

(May 03 2019 ) AFP – Sri Lankan police arrested a Reuters news agency journalist Thursday while he was covering the aftermath of Easter bombings and remanded him in custody for two weeks on a charge of trespassing, officials said.

New Delhi-based photographer Danish Siddiqui was taken into custody in Katana, 45 kilometres (28 miles) north of Colombo, an official said.

He said they took him before a local magistrate who remanded him in custody until May 15.

“Police acted on a complaint from a school in the area where the journalist was visiting,” the official in Colombo said. “He is accused of trespassing.”

Reuters declined comment.

Sri Lanka has been on edge since the Easter attacks that killed 257 people and wounded nearly 500 others.

The country is under a state of emergency giving greater powers to police and security forces to arrest and detain suspects.

The authorities have also launched nation-wide cordon-and-search operations to track down Islamists responsible for the April 21 suicide bombings targeting three churches and three luxury hotels.

EN

Sri Lanka: Out of the frying pan into the fire

 The immense tolerance displayed by the Christian population, the victims of the attack, can be considered as the only silver lining in the dark cloud. The role played by Christian leaders on this occasion is not only exemplary, but will certainly make a salutary impact on the followers of other religions and society in general – Pic by Chamila Karunarathne
logo Friday, 3 May 2019

 Lanka appears to be trapped in a vicious circle of wretchedness, not easy to escape from. Of the post-independence period which spans little over seven decades, the country has passed through a dismal backdrop of cruelty and savagery, swimming in blood for nearly three decades.

During this uncivilised period the damage and destruction caused to society and the infrastructure of the country was immense. While more than 100,000 people have been killed, most of those who were able to survive physically have undergone a spiritual death, creating a futile, distorted and disoriented society.

The nature of the public service too has changed depending on the character of politicians and bureaucrats, bequeathing the State with a sordid face of rampant corruption and exploitation. The character and the moral fibre of clergy and the religions too has changed drastically, becoming a system of institutions that disseminate hatred and animosity instead of compassion and kindness.

During Black July ’83, maximum cruelty was unleashed on Tamils, particularly on those who lived in Colombo city. Thereafter, during the period of more than three years in which the JVP insurrection prevailed, both the JVP combatants and the security forces, official and unofficial who fought against the JVP released maximum cruelty on society.

Later, the LTTE and the security forces fought against them and released maximum cruelty not only on Tamil society but also on Sinhala and Muslim societies as well. Following the defeat of the JVP, the LTTE was able to sustain its armed struggle for a very long period of 20 years.

By the time the LTTE rebellion was defeated, not only society in its entirety but the entire State had become extremely weak and distorted. The society and the State were in a state of insecurity that required immediate and formal treatment. In other words, the wounds created in the State and society had reached the stage of festering. But, both the Rajapaksa Government which won the internal war and the Yahapalana Government which replaced the former did not possess political intelligence or vision to perceive the gravity of this situation. All other political parties too lacked the wisdom to perceive the situation in its true perspective.

The ignorance that prevailed among them is not a matter for surprise. A deep change occurred in the conduct of politicians too during this long period of uncivilised atmosphere. Most of them, ignoring their role as people’s representatives, ganged up with the criminal elements of society and became businessman earning undue profits, (mis)using their political power. As they were preoccupied all the time with business interests, they did not have consciousness required for realising the deterioration of the society. Their main concern was on power politics and their interest in earning money through undue means.
Muslims in Sri Lanka 
The Muslims in Sri Lanka can be considered a community whose history goes as far back as to the Anuradhapura period, which had held the internal trading monopoly of Sri Lanka up to the advent of the Portuguese period.

During the period of the Kandyan kingdom they constituted a community group that was integrated into the caste-based system of Sinhalese social organisation. According to Ralph Peiris, Muslims had been employed in the Madige or the transport bureau; they were considered a semi caste in the Sinhalese caste hierarchy during the Kandyan period.

As Peiris has mentioned, the only reason which had prevented the upcountry Muslims from becoming a full-fledged Sinhalese caste was their religion which they did not want to abandon. As Peiris has pointed out, the circumstance of a Sinhala Goyigma caste woman married to a Muslim man had been deeply investigated into, in the court case of Ekanayaka Gedara Dingiri Manika Vs Udagedara Hitapu Koraa Arachchila (1829).

Muslims can be considered the community that was most hated by the Portuguese. The main reason of this hatred was not their religion, but the fact of them being a trading community. That was the main reason for Muslims also to harbour a deep hatred towards the Portuguese. They lost the trade monopoly that they had maintained up to then, following the advent of the Portuguese.

When the maritime areas came under Portuguese rule, the Muslims who lived in those regions fled in bulk to Kandyan territories and the Kandyan kings cordially welcomed them. That was how the places like Udathalawinna in the up country had become areas with high density Muslim populations.

Dr. Lorna Devaraja, formerly Associate Professor in History, University of Ceylon, has pointed out that King Senerath (1604-1635) had settled about 4,000 Muslims in Batticaloa (at that time, present Ampara was also constituted a part of Batticaloa) and by doing so, the king expected to recruit soldiers of war from among Muslims, in addition to employing them to produce food. This was the reason for certain areas in the Eastern Province to become locations of high density Muslim population.

Ridee Viharaya is a classic example that can be cited to illustrate the Buddhist-Muslim peaceful coexistence that prevailed at that time. The Buddhist bhikkus of Ridee Viharaya had not only settled down the Muslims in that village as legal heirs, but also allowed them to erect a mosque in temple lands and had allocated a plot of land for the maintenance of the clergy of the mosque.

Though the Portuguese and the Dutch periods were not favourable times for Muslims, the British period can be considered relatively a better era in which not only Muslims but Buddhist and Hindus had freedom to engage in commercial activities in addition to having freedom to follow their religions.

The Sinhalese remained a community that was not interested in practicing trading and commerce as a vocation. But with the opportunities available during the British rule, they too began to evince interest in trading activities which eventually led to create conflicts between the two communities. The Sinhala-Muslim riots which broke out in 1915 can be considered an instance in which these conflicts reached a climax.
The riddle of Muslims 
Muslims can be described as a community group which had taken the side of the Sinhalese on many controversial issues that arose after independence. On the national language issue, they were on the side of the Sinhalese. On the question of Tamil Eelam, they were on the side of Sinhalese. They had to pay a big price for this stance. Consequently, the Muslims who lived in the Tamil areas in the north had to flee to other areas, leaving their properties behind. This resulted in a considerable number of Muslims being killed by the Tamil militants.

The contribution of Muslims to the war against the LTTE remained at a significant and conspicuous level. Several names of Muslim officers had been included in the main list of war heroes whom the Sinhalese held in high esteem. While Prabhakaran was alive, it was only Tamil people who became the rival of the Sinhala extremists. But, after Prabhakaran was killed in his struggle for a separate state and the LTTE was completely defeated, the Sinhala extremists wanted to look for a new rival. It was the Muslim people who became their new rival.

With this development, it can be said that a bad time had dawned on Muslims. A derogatory propaganda campaign was launched against them. Cruel attacks were made in several places. It appeared that the attacks made during the Rajapaksa regime had indirect support of the State as well. It appeared that Muslims had voted en bloc to defeat the Rajapaksa regime and it can be considered a factor that influenced in inspiring anti-Muslim sentiments.

It must also be said that during the Rajapaksa regime an enormous amount of work had been done in predominantly Muslim areas in the Eastern Province. If the Rajapaksa regime hadn’t adopted an anti-Muslim policy, perhaps it would have been rather difficult to defeat Mahinda Rajapaksa at the Presidential Election 2015.

Apparently, the terrorist attacks carried out on Easter Sunday have caused serious shock and a feeling of shame among the Muslim community. It appears that Muslims have taken the lead in providing information to the Police in the present case.

What is the impact of these attacks on the psyche of the Sinhalese community? Have these incidents generated the most required discipline, enabling them to contemplate on this issue impartially and without being driven by racial passions? Will this dreadful incident provide a suitable platform to bring Muslim society in particular and entire Sri Lankan society in general to perceive this phenomenon from a rational and more modern point of view? Or else, will it cause to thrust everyone into a position where they tend to perceive it from a conservative point of view?

The immense tolerance displayed by the Christian population, the victims of the attack, can be considered as the only silver lining in the dark cloud. The role played by Christian leaders on this occasion is not only exemplary, but will certainly make a salutary impact on the followers of other religions and society in general.
Political conundrums 
The President of the country claims that he was not aware of the warnings issued by the State Intelligence Services and that he had come to know of the incident only when someone had shown him a report that appeared on Facebook while he was in Singapore. Despite the reality being such, the President had stated that he would take the responsibility as the Minister in charge of National Security of the country for the failure to protect the people from these attacks.

The explanation made by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is no different from that. The Prime Minister maintains that following the abortive attempt to change the government, he had not been called for the National Security Council meetings; and he had attempted to call a Security Council meeting after the incident, but the members of the Security Council were not in agreement with him. However, as the Prime Minister of the country, he said that he accepted collective Government responsibility for all that had happened. Looking at these statements, it is not difficult to understand the extent of bankruptcy into which the Sri Lanka State and its leaders had fallen.

Can everything be ended so easily by mere admittance of responsibility of a great catastrophe of this magnitude without doing anything to prevent it, after a great damage which could have been avoided has been caused?

If the Prime Minister had participated in the Security Council meetings held prior to the unsuccessful effort to change the prime minister, why was he not invited to participate in the meetings held thereafter? What has the President, as the head of security, got to say about it?

If India had warned beforehand about this attack through intelligence reports with details, was it not discussed by the Security Council? If it had not been discussed, who should be held responsible for that? Why did the members of the Security Council refrain from extending their support to the Prime Minister when he attempted to convene a meeting of the Security Council subsequent to this attack when the President was out of the country? Was it a voluntary decision of the members of Security Council or did they act on an order from the top?

Wasn’t the Prime Minister aware that the subject of Police should come under the Prime Minister who is vested with executive power and not the President? Didn’t the Prime Minister know that executive power sans the subject of Police which has a direct bearing on law and order of the country is not an executive power? Had he known that it was so, then how can a policy of snivelling be justified after a great catastrophe, without taking appropriate steps to bring the subject of Police under his purview?

In the light of this crisis, it would be possible to understand the mockery of the situation the entire system of governance has been plunged into by the 19th Amendment.

According to the changes effected to the Constitution in terms of the 19th Amendment, the executive powers are rested on the Prime Minister, but the Police Department comes under the President and not the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister was not being called for Security Council meetings. The members of the Security Council had refused to cooperate with the Prime Minister when he attempted to call an emergency meeting of the Security Council after a violent terrorist attack when the President was away from the country. Both the President and the Prime Minister wanted to remove the Inspector General of Police (IGP). But, there is no way they could do it except on a proposal passed by Parliament. It is interesting to note that despite the powers of the Executive President being nominal, the President is elected by an election held treating the entire country as one single electorate.

How is it possible that legal experts, political leaders and Parliament in general failed to foresee the chaos that the 19th Amendment would create in the system of governance of the country? Does it mean that they all had lost their proper sense? Do the founders of the 19th Amendment admit, at least belatedly, that the formula on political content that they brought forward to defeat Mahinda and also the limited reforms program they introduced resulted in placing the entire country in a chaotic mess rather than being a solution to resolve its problems?
About the State Intelligence Services 
It is the opinion of both the incumbent President and the former President that there has been a serious breakdown in the State Intelligence Services following the arrest of Intelligence officers and it has significantly affected the present situation.

But they do not specifically state what they really mean by it. It is not apt to speak in the language of Aesop when serious problems of security lapses like this are being discussed. It is important that they should express their opinion in a language comprehensible to the people.

Do both Presidents intend to say that all members of Intelligence services who have been charged with serious allegations are innocent people without reasonable grounds to be charged? Do both these Presidents think the incident in which 11 youth were abducted and made to disappear is a false charge fabricated and socialised with the view to ruining the Intelligence service?

Do they mean to say that the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda, assassination of Lasantha Wickrematunge, inhuman attacks made on several media personnel including Keith Noyahr and assassination of Thajudeen, etc. are baseless and false allegations? Or else, that these crimes should be ignored just because the people connected with them are officers of the State Intelligence Services who served the country as Intelligence officers?

Wasantha Karannagoda, the then Navy Commander, was the first complainant of the incident in which 11 youth were abducted. He had made this complaint to the Colombo Crime Division on 28 May 2009. It was during the regime of Mahinda Rajapaksa and not during the Yahapalana Government that the complaint was made. He had made the complaint in his capacity as the Navy Commander against Sampath Munasinha, his personal security officer, in charge of his security.

Prior to making the complaint, the Naval Disciplinary Security Unit had checked the room used by those officers and found weapons, a cheque drawn for a sum of Rs. 760,000, two promissory notes, one for Rs. 500,000 and the other for Rs. 400,000, four bank account books of three people, a passport and four ID cards.

The Criminal Investigations Department has disclosed and proved with evidence that the youth who owned the passport and the four other youth who owned the four ID cards found in the room and six more youth abducted and detained at two different locations belonged to the Navy to obtain ransoms.

Later, all of them had been killed from time to time and their bodies dismembered and thrown into the sea. What should be the policy adopted by a country in respect of those who committed such heinous crimes? Is it proper to retain people who committed such heinous crimes in Intelligence services?

Controversial ACJU and deviated Tableegh brought this humiliation

President Sirisena banning Burqa and Niqab  

The ban is to ensure national security. No one should obscure their faces to make identification difficult
Muslims remain a minority and they need to live in harmony with other communities
4 May 2019
President Maithripala Sirisena, using emergency powers, banned all forms of face covering - burqa and niqab - in public on Sunday 27 April 2019. The restriction came into effect within 24 hours - on the following day, Monday.  
A statement issued in this regard by the President’s office said that “the ban is to ensure national security. No one should obscure their faces to make identification difficult.” The move, as expected, was supported by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.  
President Sirisena had issued this order without consulting the Muslim community, which should appreciate that a Buddhist monk came on television and said that  this should be done in cooperation and coordination with the Muslim community.  
Who is responsible for this humiliation? In view of the growing animosity towards Muslim women wearing face cover, the ACJU, claiming to be the sole religious body, should have advised Muslim women from the very inception, in keeping with the teachings of Quran.  
The ACJU and Tableegh movement failed to understand that there has been growing resistance leading to animosity towards Muslim women wearing the black abaya and covering of face
This was extremely essential as Muslims remain a minority and they need to live in harmony with other communities. However the ACJU miserably failed.   
President of All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulema (ACJU), Moulana M.I.M. Rizvi once said in an interview with Muslim newspaper Navamani that wearing face cover was compulsory-wajib.
However ACJU Assistant Secretary Moulavi Murshid Mulaffar now states that his organization fully endorsed the ban under the emergency regulations, and all Muslim women had to abide by the law.   
Meanwhile prominent Islamic scholar Ustad Mansoor Abu Salih who has written a book on the subject - UNVEILED - The Concept of roles and attire of women in Islam - clearly explained that covering face has nothing to do with Islam. This was not mentioned anywhere in the Holy Quran and there was no saying of beloved Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Added to this these are not even Sunna-optional.   
Many scholars pointed out that Quran does not mention to cover the face, however a Hadith reflects uncovering of face and hands: 
It was narrated from Aishah that Asma bint Abu Bakr entered upon the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) wearing a thin garment. The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) turned away from her and said: “Oh Asma, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it is not proper for anything to be seen of her except this and this,” and he pointed to his face and hands.” [Sunan Abu Dawud (Darussalam Publishers, 2007),volume 4, p. 422,The Book of Clothing, chapter 31: “What a woman may show of her beauty,” Hadith number 4104. The Hadith is Mursal by itself but authentic due to supporting narrations and is used as evidence for this matter . . . It was authenticated by Sheikh Al-Albani in Sahih Sunan Abu Dawud, vol. 2, p. 774, number 3458.  
Due to our own shortcomings we have failed to uphold the true values of Islam 
Thus the ACJU and the Tableegh movement which has hijacked the ACJU, should take full responsibility for the humiliation suffered by the community caused by the president’s ban on face cover.  
In fact this has been one of the main demands of Sinhala racists and the Easter Sunday massacre was exploited by the media and others to achieve their aim. The ACJU and Tableegh movement failed to understand that there has been growing resistance leading to animosity towards Muslim women wearing the black abaya and covering of face.   
For example as early as September 2006 during a meeting organized by Bakeer Markar Centre for Communal Harmony, Aluthgama District Medical Officer Dr. Kanchana Munasinghe told me that the growing trend of Muslim women wearing black abaya was causing concern among non-Muslims who feel isolated. She said that this black cloth is not suitable to tropical climates like Sri Lanka as it could cause skin diseases.  
Several leading Sinhalese intellectuals who are interested in communal harmony told me that the black Abaya and face cover cause friction between communities and kindly get your people to stop as they are not part of Islam.  
I wrote about the growing threat. All appeals in this regard fell on the deaf ears of ACJU and Tableegh –a group deviated from mainstream Islam. People were confused and helpless and the community is paying the price.  
During my visit to London in 2015, I bought a book titled Hijab or Niqab - An Islamic critique of the face-veil by London based Egyptian scholar Syed Mutawallai Ad-Darsh with an introduction by M. Mazherudding Siddiq.   
He stated in the opening page as follows; 
“I disagree with the statement that niqab (face-veil) is an obligation, and have been at pains to explain this from the outset. There is no hard or questionable proof in the Holy Quran or Sunnah to that effect. Otherwise are we going to question the integrity or scholarship of the overwhelming majority of the learned community of Islam? I find myself amazed by the claims of latter-day scholars, who say, “But we live in bad times…or society is a bad society….now women should this or that…..”This is an illogical attitude which opens the door to discarding Islamic rues, such as the government controlled muftis who say that modern banking is different from the lending and usury of times past. This is a very dangerous trend indeed.” 
Meanwhile in his comments to Ustad Mansoor’s book. Dr. Seyed Aroos Sherfideen, Director Australia based Al Hikmah Publication had this to state about the current pathetic plight of Muslims worldwide.  
‘Radicalization, terrorism, uncivilized,’ Very often these words appear in the media referring to Muslims or Muslim countries. Who is to be blamed? Some blame the extremists who have a corrupted understanding of Islam. Some blame the west. Some blame the media for false propaganda. And some blame Islam itself. Who is right? 
Centuries ago, on a dark and desolate night, in the cave of Hira, in Makkah, Islam was revealed to a man chosen by God. A man who was called the Trustworthy by his own people; Muhammad (peace be upon him).  
The revolution began. It took the world by storm. Within twenty years of its revelation the revolution was complete. From a land that was once infested with idolatory, crime, corruption, prostitution, slavery, infanticide, alcoholism, witchcraft and ignorance, rose the legendary men and women who fought and fell for the sake of Truth. For the sake of Justice. For the sake of God.
Islam gave birth to a new world where justice prevailed where slaves became rulers and women became leaders.   
 How does Islam view women? Do they have freedom? What role does Islam assign them in their society and what attire does Islam prescribe the women? These roles which flame across the media have given the image that Islam oppresses women. But reality is quite different.  
More than 1400 years ago, Islam recognized women’s rights. It recognized woman’s right to inherit, a right for divorce, her right to bear witness and her right for equality and liberty. However, due to our own shortcomings we have failed to uphold the true values of Islam.  
Ustad Mansoor’s book is an attempt to clarify some of the misunderstandings on how Islam treats women. The author explores the concept of social life and the attire of women in the light of Quran and Sunnah. By citing evidence from the Quran and Sunnah and scholarly interpretations, he cleverly argues how Islam has elevated the status of women and liberated them. It is written in context of the Sri Lankan situation, however, the logic applies to the larger context as well.
Thus concluded Dr. Seyed Aroos Sheriffdeen.

The anger without a cure


A Sri Lankan soldier stands guard outside St Anthony's Shrine in Colombo

by Sanjana Haththotuwa- 

Seeing a country grieve through millions of data points is a strange experience. Posts, videos, photos, memes, articles, tweets, status updates, cartoons, drawings, podcasts on the Easter Sunday terrorism already number in the tens of thousands. Those who have in some way engaged with this content, in the around 1,000 accounts on Facebook and an equivalent number on Twitter I monitor closely and daily, number in the tens of millions. Some videos, already, have been viewed more times than the population of Sri Lanka. In fact, the Easter Sunday attacksresulted in a tsunami of content that exceeded the volume and velocity of production at the height of pushback against the constitutional putsch late last year.Keep in mind that this rate of engagement and content consumption is despite the longest ever social media block in the country, lasting 9 days.

My column is often pegged to the nature of content and conversation on social media, and why it matters to readers of this newspaper. This writing is pegged to the belief that politics, governance and ultimately, the timbre of our increasingly fragile democratic fabric is shaped by content and opinions furnished from, forged on or framed through social media. What kind of country we will wake up to is no longer a given. The degree of anxiety, expressed, privately shared and hidden, is real and growing. Social media provides easy publication and promotion of emotions, which academics call the contagion effect. In a vacuum of credible, reassuring or official communications, fear or anxiety latch on to and predominantly shape the appreciation of content that arouses anger, kinetic action and violent reactions, over reasoned response, reconciliation or reflection. Both the fog of conflicting narratives and the absence of credible accounts from government create a context ripe for the weaponisation of grief, loss and pain. This is done in a number of ways, by blatantly offensive content or, far more dangerously, by material anchored to some truth, but taken out of context, features a larger narrative, scenario or story entirely removed from reality.The harvest from this crop of hate, insecurity and othering is socio-political instability that in spiralling towards the violent resolution of conflict, aids the further entrenchment of what gives rise to extremism. The worst possible responses are projected and perceived as the best possible solutions. Knowing this, and leveraging the opportunity, malevolent actors, for partisan, political or political gain, produce and push out content that inflames tensions and incites hate.

All this, to many of this newspaper, will reaffirm their belief that the government was entirely right in blocking social media in the wake of the terrorist attacks on Easter Sunday. I have two responses – one an analogy, the other based on hard data. Consider for a moment social media like one would the national grid. You don’t need to be an electrical engineer to understand that if there’s a problem with a specific place or section of the grid, the solution is not to shut the entire grid down indefinitely and without any warning. Power distribution accounts for sudden surges and spikes in certain areas. It can also, based on historical consumption patterns, ascertain and plan for consumption at certain times, in certain areas. If short-circuits or frequent transformer failures are reported from a certain area, the problem is clearly local and is addressed as much. If necessary, power cuts in the area are established to address the problem, without affecting the entire, national grid. Constant oversight is necessary, for repairs and maintenance operations. While management and planning can and must be done at a national level, by its very nature, the grid requires local oversight and knowledge. A single office in Colombo cannot manage a national grid. A neglected or overwhelmed grid will fail, and often with catastrophic consequences.

What our government does in times of a national emergency is the equivalent of shutting down the entire electricity grid. Evident after Easter Sunday, cementing what was known before, is the complete, catastrophic absence of any coherent, cohesive or concise crisis and political communications from the PM or President. There is no point, anymore, flagging this. If acknowledged as something we will suffer from in the short time left for this government, the analogy above recommends a more nuanced, strategic and sensible approach to social media oversight. The study of content, locating what is produced in context, monitoring key trends, capturing accounts that show a proclivity towards malevolent behaviour or output, gathering information on distribution patterns, vectors and participant voices featuring hate or violence – all this and more, not unlike the upkeep of a grid, is necessary. All this can be done with legal and regulatory frameworks already present. No new laws are needed. Social media companies, under intense and relentless pressure in the West, are investing heavily in oversight and support structures to government as well as civil society to stem the flow of misinformation, hate and violence. The very companies that a few years ago scoffed at their role, reach and relevance in fomenting hate are now invested more than governments in technologies to stop or stem content that results in real world hate or harm. With all this in play, the Sri Lankan government’s approach is an awfully simplistic one, treating social media like a switch and believing that turning it all off will somehow help protect citizenry. This is what children do when scared, not what adults governing a country should do in a crisis.

This is also where data comes in. Data in the aggregate or at scale – looking at thousands of accounts, tens of thousands of comments and tens of millions of engagements –negates individual opinions. Debating data requires arguments anchored to data, escaping the gravitational pull of invective and insult that often accompanies any contest of personal opinion in Sri Lanka. Through the analysis of very large datasets and their visualisation, I placed in public how the social media block was inefficient and importantly, ineffective. On Facebook, there is scant evidence that the block, in the two days after it was imposed on the 21st, impacted output of and engagement with a large cluster of gossip pages on Facebook. However, no other cluster monitored was impacted. By the end of the week, every single cluster I monitor comprising just over 1,000 accounts in total showed a clear increase from the previous week by way of output and engagement. Twitter wasn’t blocked, and unsurprisingly shows some of the highest levels of activity I’ve ever seen. Tellingly, the same government that shut off access Facebook continued to post on it, leading me to believe that even those in high political office knew full well that millions of citizens could and would circumvent the block. Some videos published by political parties and leading news channels were viewed by more than the population of Sri Lanka in the space of a week, indicating a thirst for news and information over what was an unprecedented situation across the country.

If the intent was to control, curtail or even censor content that incited hate and violence, there was no evidence of the government’s intervention. Many ordinary citizens, however, stepped up to the challenge, leading some to even design, develop and deploy an app to verify rumours. A clear trend was also evident in the takedown of posts and content reported by users. Despite all this, disturbingly, the data suggests a steep rise in anger followed by an unprecedented wave of sadness on social media, over the course of the week. There is also a lot of love recorded on Facebook, but qualitative analysis very clearly shows that this expression is around content that is bitterly critical of the government, who tens of thousands if not more hold directly responsible for the loss of life on Easter Sunday. I am entirely convinced those in power, who do not understand social media, remain oblivious to this or how it will invariablyfind expression in electoral or street-corner dynamics.

I could go on, but what’s clear is that Western journalism and scholarship, which after the Easter Sunday attacks welcomed as necessary and inevitable the social media block, as well as the Sri Lankan government, which claimed the block was implemented to protect citizens, were both very wrong.

Since Easter Sunday, I have struggled to find the words to express the urgency of meaningfully addressing grief and growing grievances on social media. A few of us are doing our best to push back on the sickening exploitation of terrorism to ensure much more of it. For the first time in a long time, I am not convinced it is enough to stop the country’s plunge into an abyss I can see all too clearly, every day.

Killing of two PCs at Vavunathivu Police post:-Sampanthan calls for Ajanthan’s release


Saturday, May 4, 2019 

TNA leader R.Sampanthan has reportedly written to Defence Secretary General Shantha Kottegoda requesting him to release Kethirgamathambi Rajakumaran, alias Ajanthan who was taken into custody over the killing of two Police Constables at Vavunathivu Police post on November 30, last year.

Writing to the Defence Secretary on Wednesday, Sampanthan has reportedly said, “Two Police constables were killed at the Vavunativu Police post on November 30, 2018.

Kathimamathambi Rajakumaran, alias Ajanthan was taken into custody and he is now held under a detention order.

“I am informed that consequent to the recent bomb blasts, the arrests made and the investigations conducted reveal that two Police Constables were killed by others. If this Information is correct, then the above named Kethirgamathambi Rajakumaran, alias Ajanthan should not be kept in custody any longer. Kindly look into this matter and do the needful”.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe’s Axe Against Hemasiri Linked To Deal For Avant Garde

logo
Colombo Telegraph can reveal that former Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe‘s reasons for making police complaints against former Secretary to the Ministry of Defence Hemasiri Fernandowho is an ex naval officer is linked to a lucrative contract he was pushing the Defence Ministry to give the highly controversial private security firm Avant Garde which is run by Rajapakshe’s bosom friend Major (Rtd) Nissanka Senadhipathi.
Rajapakshe who has been a strong backer of Senadhipathi and his Avant Garde even as the security firm that ran floating armouries by illegally leasing weapons from the Sri Lankan military while Gotabaya Rajapaksa ran security affairs was trying to get new licences for the company a few months ago Colombo Telegraph learns. This is even as Senadhipathi remains on bail for defrauding hundreds of millions of rupees of funds from the state and Avant Garde has multiple cases and investigations ongoing about their activities using state resources and funds under the auspices of Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Nissanka Senadhipathy and his Avant Garde still owes Rs 2.8 billion in dues to the Sri Lankan Government which is yet to be paid for profits earned through its Floating Armoury business.
Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe who is currently a major Sirisena loyalist took Senadhipathy’s request to President Maithripala Sirisena it is learnt. Former Minister S.B. Dissanayake was also involved in the negotiation Colombo Telegraph learns.
President Sirisena summoned a meeting of security officials and asked the Defence Ministry to consider giving licences to Avant Garde to resume operations. However senior Navy officials who were present at the meeting strongly opposed the President’s proposal saying the Avant Garde was still owing them hundreds of millions in unpaid dues. All three forces personnel opposed the move Colombo Telegraph can reveal and even the Chief of Defence Staff was not in favour of the proposal.
This had caused the President to back down from the plan sources said but he insisted on a committee being set up to study the matter. However it is learned that through Rajapakshe and Dissanayake, Nissanka Senadhipathi tried to sneak in two of his “preferred” officials into the committee. Senadhipathi has several military officials on his payroll Colombo Telegraph learns.

Read More

Friday, May 3, 2019


‘Mayday, Mayday’ in this sinking ship


article_image

 

May Day this year was only one of memories; and delightful memories indeed. Those long walks through the streets of Colombo, with the redshirted leadership of NM, Colvin, Leslie and Bernard, with slogans of revolution, the fight against capitalism and colonial power, the combating against corruption and the unity of workers and peasants, from those in the plantations and factories, teachers, clerks, and farmers – and the singing of "Saadukin Pelanavun – Dan Ithin Nagityav" were parades of joy with great expectations.

The parades were smaller and shorter as the years passed by and the left parties began to merge with the larger parties in the politics of governance, and away from the revolution of workers and peasants. We came to a time when the colour of May Day was a choice between Green and Blue, and Indian singers gave more delight to the masses on Galle Face Green than the slogans of politicians.

What we saw this year was a May Day of disaster; one of tragedy and mourning. The requiem of the church, replaced the slogans of hope and expectation. The prayers for peace supplanted the thoughts of revenge. A shroud of national unity sought to hide the widening divisions.

This became a May Day of the recognition of reality; a day of deep exposure of the corrupt, crooked and debased society, waving a false flag of democracy and humanity.

We are now in the travail of a corrupt society, with no promise of the birth of honesty and decency in the near future. Through seventy years of freedom we have moved away from the goals of honesty and good governance, to targets of the crooked and corrupt, the dishonest and immoral. Those blasts at the churches on Easter Sunday brought us a tearful reminder of how far we have regressed from the reaches of civilization.

What do we do with politicians, whether party leaders or hangers on, who believe politics is the art of deceit and not the art of government? How do we come to terms with those in governance, and others seeking such goals, whose purpose is the gaining of power and/for profit, and never the service of the people and society?

How is it that the Security Services who are now making rapid and well-focused arrests in the post-Easter disaster, were unable to move so effectively in the post-Buddha statue and shrine attacks at Mawanella? How were any of the suspects or accused in the Wanathawilluva findings of crime released? What was the insufficient evidence against them? Shouldn’t the people know this, or is it only for the related politicians?

This is not against Muslim education, but how is it that a single centre of Islamic education with huge funds from West Asia was able to exist with no registration even as a seat of higher education, which it claimed to provide? Was it allowed with the same thinking that gave scholarships to the students at SAITM? From what we have seen in recent days it is the most luxurious seat of learning (if it is really so) in this country. Luxury is good for the students, but what were they taught and by whom? Sharia Law is a system of jurisprudence accepted by many countries, and certainly a subject our students should also know. But, who taught it, how and with what goals? How can the Governor of a Province of this county, hold such an important position in an improperly registered or declared institution of education, in the same province, with such funding from abroad? And how much did the former Governor know about all this? These certainly need answers.

The Muslim students of this country certainly need good and wide education. But, does all the rapidly approved Madrassas give good and proper education, and who sets the syllabus and supervises the teaching?

Those in government should not try to evade these issues with excuses of ignorance or the game of political silence.

This is as important as knowing whether the King of the Spice Trade, whose sons were involved in the Easter terror, obtained his spice mint from the crooked handling of our pepper exports by the Minister of such trade? It looks like the crooked earnings from pepper added deadly spice to the bombers of Easter Sunday.

Are we to really take seriously the Muslim Affairs Minister’s explanation that the swords found in some mosques and elsewhere (no comment on the daggers found) could have been to cut the grass and greenery at the mosque compounds? Are we going to a new era of sword fighting with greenery?

These are some aspects of the crooked and deceitful exposure we have seen in recent days. They are continuance of the huge corruption that has thrived under a government elected to fight and rid this country of corruption. The ever expanding ignorance of Maithripala Sirisena and the evasive sub-knowledge of Ranil Wickremesinghe make the package of crooked governance the country is faced with.

Together with all the other corruption we have seen in the past four years, combined with the Constitutional Coup of Sirisena and Central Bank bamboozling of Ranil Wickremesinghe, we are now threatened with a massive explosion of the corrupt.

It is the time to make a ‘mayday, mayday’ distress signal about the sinking ship of Sri Lankan society.