Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, April 22, 2019

Sri Lanka: 290 Killed And 500 Injured On Easter Sunday Bombing

logo
Updated 9.45 am –  290 people were killed by Monday morning with 500 have been injured, Police Spokesman Ruwan Gunasekara said. He also said 24 suspects are currently in the CID custody.
Updated 7.00 pm –  207 people were killed and 450 others injured the police spokesman, Ruwan Gunasekera told media a short while ago. “The government has imposed police curfew and shut down social media and messaging services, he further said.
Updated 12.00 pm – 138 people have been killed and 402 wounded, the Director of Colombo National Hospital Dr. Anil Jasinghe told media a short while ago.
At least 130 people were killed and 402 wounded, in a hate-filled attacks targeting three churches and three five-star hotels in Sri Lanka.
The explosions happened almost simultaneously between 8.30 am and 9.00 am at St. Anthony’s Church in Kochchikade, Colombo and St. Sebastian’s Church in Nigombo and Zion Church in Batticaloa.
Explosions were also reported at three five-star hotels, the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand and Kingsbury in Colombo.

Read More

Prioritising vetting in Sri Lanka’s Transitional Justice process


Featured image courtesy Global Risk Insights

ESTHER HOOLE- 
Major General Shavendra Silva faces credible allegations of violating international humanitarian law and human rights. During the last stages of the war in 2009, he was the Commanding Officer of the 58th Division which is accused of direct attack on civilian targets including hospitals and food distribution queues, of being responsible for the disappearance of several persons associated with the LTTE who surrendered in the last days of the conflict, and the summary execution of senior LTTE personnel along with their family during the ‘white flag incident’. On an international platform, these allegations were most recently documented by the Report of the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) Investigation on Sri Lanka in 2015, based on independent investigation and extensive witness testimony.

Despite all this, on 9 January 2019, Major General Silva was promoted by President Sirisena to the second highest position in the military – Chief of Defence Staff. This has drawn intense criticism from civil society and victim groups. However, it is not surprising.

For years, Sri Lankan State institutions have allowed and contributed to a culture of impunity. Individuals who should be investigated for allegations of corruption and serious crime, are often promoted and given increased access to power and resources. Major General Silva’s most recent promotion is only the latest in a series of such troubling promotions. In his own career, in 2017 he was appointed Adjutant General of the Sri Lankan army. In this role, oversight of the army’s compliance with human rights and international humanitarian law was placed within his purview. Prior to this, under the former regime, he was one of Sri Lanka’s representatives at the UN.

This alarming pattern of rewarding alleged criminals within the military also takes place on a lower stratum, tied to internal corruption. There are recent allegations that senior navy officers implicated in the ‘Navy 11’ cases were given promotions, on the recommendation of Chief of Defense Staff Admiral Ravindra Wijeguneratne, who is himself also implicated in this case. These were reportedly questioned by the CID, but there seems to be no further progress.

It is widely accepted by legal and political academics and practitioners, that accountability is necessary for deterrence and rule of law, non-recurrence, victim empowerment and reconciliation. It follows from this, that accountability significantly contributes to political and economic stability, strong international relations with liberal states and functioning democracy.

Despite this, Sri Lanka is yet to credibly investigate and prosecute allegations of mass atrocity crimes committed by both sides of the conflict during the war. Much of this is because of the general political opposition to accountability, and more specifically, to a special court with the involvement of international judges and trials under international law, as required by HRC Resolution 30/1. Although it will take time and continued advocacy, this must remain a priority demand in Sri Lanka’s transitional justice process.

In the meantime, however, vetting, which is another crucial accountability process, has been de-prioritised in transitional justice advocacy. Vetting is the removal of defence personnel or civil servants who are found to have violated human rights or be lacking in integrity or capacity.
There are several reasons for why vetting is important in Sri Lanka, especially in light of the ongoing transitional justice process. Firstly, it contributes a punitive element. Although vetted individuals are not sent to prison or required to pay compensation, as is often the case following prosecutions, they lose their positions in State institutions. Along with that, they lose their income, social standing and power. Secondly, vetting offenders reinforces the rule of law. In a context of long-standing impunity, vetting marks a change in institutional standards and outlook, warning future offenders that they will be held accountable for their actions in accordance with existing legislation and guidelines. Thirdly, vetting can contribute much to non-recurrence. When former offenders are no longer present in State institutions, and when those institutions signal an end to impunity and a commitment to compliance with domestic and international law, the chances of renewed human rights violations and corruption significantly drop. Fourthly, vetting can significantly contribute to reconciliation and renewed trust in the State. In contexts where victim groups are wary and resentful of the State, the removal of alleged perpetrators from their positions signals an acknowledgement of past wrongs, and State institutions’ commitment to reform and non-recurrence.

Vetting is also vital to Sri Lanka’s Transitional Justice (TJ) process. For TJ to be successful, various State institutions – including security sector institutions – must be supportive of the process and refrain from interfering with or obstructing the implementation of TJ measures and policies. For example, with respect to truth-seeking and criminal investigations, crucial information can only be obtained from the military.  Failure to devise and implement vetting measures will not only result in such information being withheld, but also in the persistence of threats and intimidation to victims and witnesses, preventing them from participating in the TJ  process.  This pattern of threats and refusals to cooperate with investigations by the military is already evident in ongoing high-profile cases including Prageeth Ekneligoda and the Navy 11, highlighting the immediate need for a vetting process. If alleged perpetrators of human rights violation and crimes are given access to victims and witnesses of their crimes under the pretext of ‘protection,’ it will be the greatest mockery of victim trust and the transitional justice process as a whole.

One of the greatest accusations regarding the accountability processes in Sri Lanka is that they are ‘political witch hunts’ on the basis of personal, party or political affiliations. The Sri Lankan government, and institutions setting up a vetting process, must ensure that there is no factual basis for such accusations. On the contrary, the UN’s ‘Vetting: An operational framework’, specifies that vetting must be carried out by an independent commission – especially with respect to security institutions. They recommend a structured process, clear criteria, and objective assessment on the basis of such criteria. In accordance with the rules of due process, individuals who are to be vetted out of an institution are to have reasonable notice of the case, the right to contest the case, and to appeal an adverse decision to a higher tribunal or court.

Vetting does not only contribute to transitional justice, but enables a broader return to rule of law and functioning democracy. As such, the call for vetting cannot solely come from private institutions, but must instead be a prioritised call from the public. During the political coup in 2018, we saw unprecedented public engagement on issues of accountability and rule of law. Significantly, this included the immense outcry from the public and civil society following the transfer order issued to OIC Nishantha Silva which was soon cancelled. This was a rare instance where public lobby seemed to play a defining part in changing an Executive order, and the internal behaviour of a Sri Lankan State institution. This lesson on the effectiveness of public participation and democracy must not be lost on us when advocating for a vetting process.

Corruption and human rights violations carried out by some individuals in State institutions and the security sector cast a damning shadow on Sri Lankan State infrastructure as a whole – domestically and internationally. With regards to transitional justice, as long as alleged perpetrators of mass atrocity crimes remain in their positions, or worse, are celebrated and promoted despite their crimes, no mechanism will be able to act independently and legitimately. They will be unable to provide a space for victims and witnesses to openly testify and participate. A credible vetting process must become and remain a priority demand of diplomats, reformist policy makers, civil society, media, victim groups and the general public. Else, its absence will be a serious barrier to genuine reconciliation, rule of law or institutional reform.

Editor’s Note: Also read ‘Of Patriots and Traitors’ and ‘Sorting Bad Apples: Is Lustration the Answer to Sri Lanka’s Military Impunity?
Sri Lanka police arrest 24 suspects in connection with Easter Day bombings 

Mon, Apr 22, 2019, 10:18 am SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.


Lankapage Logo
Apr 22, Colombo: Sri Lanka Police say 24 suspects have been arrested so far in connection with the series of explosions that rocked the country on Easter Sunday (April 21).

The suspects are being detained in the custody of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) and interrogated.

Police Media Spokesman Superintendent of Police Ruwan Gunasekara said yesterday's multiple bombings killed 290 people and injured more than 500 people. Among the dead are 27 foreign nationals.

Six Bombs exploded at the St. Anthony's Church in Kochchikade, St. Sebastian's Church in Katuwapitiya, Katana, and Zion Church in Batticaloa while hotels Kingsbury, Shangri-La and Cinnamon Grands came under attack. A Seventh bomb exploded near the National Zoo in Dehiwala.

In addition to the police and police Special Task Force (STF) the three armed forces have been deployed to ensure security of the country. Accordingly over 1000 military personnel have been deployed for security of Colombo, according to the Army.

Meanwhile, the Air Force has been assigned for the security of the Katunayake and Mattala International airports and they have already begun inspections. In addition, the airport security sections also conduct security and inspection activities.

According to SLAF Spokesman Group Captain Gihan Seneviratne, passengers traveling overseas can obtain information from the telephone number 116.

Meanwhile, a special operations unit of the police headquarters, the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of External Affairs has been established.


Information can be obtained from Ministry of Defense on 0112 322 485. Foreign nationals can obtain information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at 0112 32 30 15 Police Media Spokesman Superintendent of Police Ruwan Gunasekara said.

We Reprobate Sri Lanka Easter Sunday Attacks

The main problem intelligence organisations in countries like us are up against is a lack of professional manpower and necessary technological resources. A number of countries have to be involved in intense struggles with terrorist organisations.
 
by Anwar A Khan-2019-04-22
 
Churches and hotels in Sri Lanka were hit by bomb explosions on the Easter Sunday yesterday. We are born to die, but not on this demonic way. My heart is crushed.
 
The death toll in the Easter Sunday terror bombings climbs to 207 and counting with hundreds more wounded. It is a devastating news for people across the world. I cannot imagine a human being could target the peaceful people on their celebration day. Those terrorists’ perverted disposition goes against the teachings of all religions.
 
This news from Sri Lanka is horrifying. My heart goes out to all victims and their families. So many were people attending church on one of the holiest of days, I am absolutely sickened. It is an attack on humanity. On a day devoted to love, redemption, and renewal, we pray for the victims and stand with the people of Sri Lanka.
 
There is no doubt that these attacks are the work of cowardly and despicable criminals who want to sow conflict and tear the world apart with any regard to innocent people.
 
These attacks are another reason why we must always stand together and stand firm against all forms of violent extremism, whether they occur a half a world away or here Sri Lanka or elsewhere.
 
We should achieve unity and continue to better ourselves by constantly making an effort to understand each other and respect our differences. We must speak loudly and forcefully against the kind of extremism that is behind the bloodshed in Sri Lanka.
 
Again I must say I am heartbroken for the people of Sri Lanka.
 
There are no words that could possibly bring comfort or understanding at times like these - I can only offer my deepest sorrow and love along with the millions of others mourning for Sri Lankans. That is not also enough. Sri Lankan government must find out the real perpetrators to send them to the gallows.
 
When I visited the country 5 years ago, I found it a beautiful place with beautiful people. Sri Lanka, my heart is with you. I am praying for everyone affected by this horrible tragedy. This is insanity. Stay strong.
 
The world to join hands in the fight against terrorism, terms it an evil and a terrible scourge that should be wiped out completely from the face of the earth.
 
The right to the freedom of worship is a fundamental right. No political or other cause can justify or excuse the bombing of people at worship or simply going about their daily lives. The Sri Lankan attacks and a recent attack on a mosque in New Zealand are a challenge to us all to protect everyone's freedom of religion and belief. Places of worship and other places must be places of peace, free from fear.
 
These people are our sisters and brothers. We stand in solidarity with them and they with us. Together we are one family of the resurrection. Such acts of violence on the Easter holy day are acts of violence against all beliefs and denominations, and against all those who value the freedom of religion and the choice to worship.
 
A series of explosions were reported at three churches, three hotels and two other places in several cities in Sri Lanka, including the capital Colombo. At least 207 people, including several foreign nationals, have been killed and more than 500 wounded in the bombings. The church bombings occurred during Easter mass in Negombo, Batticaloa and Colombo while the three hotels targeted were the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand and Kingsbury hotels in Colombo.
 
As terrorist groups change tactics, any government must understandably adjust their antiterrorism efforts. It is the responsibility of all stakeholders—including governments, regional bodies, militaries, and civil society organisations to ensure that adopted antiterrorism efforts must continue.
 
An effective measure to stop terrorists is to cut their sources of revenue and disrupt logistics. The counter-terrorism strategy should be based on four strands: prevent, protect, pursue and respond. Our vision is to be secure and resilient nations that effectively prevents terrorism in ways that preserve our freedom and prosperity.
 
Secretary-General of the United Nation António Guterres words are of immense signification, “Our responsibility is to unite to build a world of peace and security, dignity and opportunity for all people, everywhere, so we can deprive the violent extremists of the fuel they need to spread their hateful ideologies.”
 
Reinforcing internal security and the fight against terrorism
 
Establish protection perimeters in order to ensure security at events or in particularly vulnerable places. The visual bag inspections and security frisking by private security agents, under the supervision of police officers. Internal security forces will also be able to search vehicles. If any person does not submit to checks, he or she will be denied access or removed from the security perimeter.
 
Allow the closure of places of worship when "words, writings, activities, ideas or theories" that incite or endorse terrorism, and incitement "to hatred and discrimination" are used there. In order to regulate the use of this power, a prior adversarial procedure is to be provided for as well as a time limit allowing an interim order application to be lodged before an administrative judge.
 
Allow the administrative authority to put in place administrative controls and individual monitoring measures against any person in respect of whom there is serious reason to believe their behaviour constitutes a particularly serious threat and who enters into regular contact with individuals or organisations with terrorist intent or who supports or adheres to views that incite terrorism. This measure is less restrictive than house arrest, but is sufficient to ensure effective monitoring. It may be accompanied by the obligation to report once a day to the police unit and may be renewed for three months if new or additional information is presented. The person may be exempted from this daily obligation to report if they agree to be placed under electronic surveillance.
 
Allow appropriate authorities to order, only with the prior authorisation of the judge supervising releases and detention, the entry and search of any place if there is serious reason to believe it is being frequented by a person posing a terrorist threat or who is in contact with such persons.
 
The ability to carry out administrative investigations for civil servants in positions of authority and who pose a risk of radicalisation, and where necessary, to take appropriate action, either by transferring, suspending or removing the person(s) concerned.
 
Establish a new legal regime for monitoring wireless communications.
 
Members of terrorist cells need to gather weapons, use various forms of communication, and coordinate among each other. A proper intelligence network has an established network of agents who gather intelligence among target populations from which terrorists come. They know how to identify signs and situations that indicate terrorist activity. In order to carry out successful intelligence gathering, agents must have an extremely advanced familiarity with the area and communities they are dealing with. They need to know what the problematic aspects are, and which areas have the potential to become problematic and become breeding grounds for terrorism.
 
Security agents need to be able to accurately map out populations, to recruit and handle agents as well technological surveillance equipment, to arrest and interrogate suspects and monitor suspicious Internet activity.
 
All of this human and technological activity must be approved as legal before it can be carried out. Huge amounts of information are constantly being transmitted and technological systems are always being updated. This information is then examined by a number of different security agencies so that it can be crosschecked and verified before being used.
 
The main problem intelligence organisations in countries like us are up against is a lack of professional manpower and necessary technological resources. A number of countries have to be involved in intense struggles with terrorist organisations.
 
Modern day terrorism is not a national struggle for independence, but a murderous struggle carried out by religious fanatics who are fighting and willing to die for their principles. In the absence of appropriate legislation and supportive information systems, it is almost impossible to manage this type of struggle.
 
It may be easier to track these terrorist cells by using a combination of technological and human surveillance.
 
Again, we are very sympathetic to the pain of those affected in Sri Lanka and in solidarity,
 
-The End –
 
The writer is a senior citizen of Bangladesh, writes on politics, political and human-centred figures, current and international affairs.

Intelligence report submitted before, India has already warned, President already knows, did nothing to prevent but escaped, Lets chase the traitor, Ranil too accountable !!


LEN logo(Lanka e News - 22.April.2019, 11.30PM) Now it is confirmed that president Pallewatta gamarala was well aware about the suicide attack before and got out of the country without taking any measures to prevent the catastrophe.
On the 4th of April State intelligence Service (SIS) has given a report to Pallewatta Gamarala about the suicide mission planned to be carried out by the leader of National Thawheed Jamath Mohamed Zaharan targeting catholic churches and the Indian high commission, You can read the full description of the report attached below. Meantime a copy of the SIS report has been submitted to the IGP too. In the warning letter issued by DIG Priyalal Dassanayake on the 11th of April too has stated about this intelligence report. The despicable attorney general who always comes forward to save president Gamarala said that it was a false letter but today DIG Priyalal Dassanayake once again confirmed that the letter issued by him was a true one.
The Indian high commissioner too has personally called the president during the first week of April and informed about this destruction.
However President Pallewatta Gamarala without convening the Security Council and discuss about the catastrophe, has secured himself and his family and visited Thiruppathy India. Following Thirupathy he has visited Singapore. In Singapore he had a secret discussion and fixed a mega deal with one businessmen named Bernard who owns Oriental Connection Pvt Ltd during the last few months of his stay as president. Although he could have come to Sri Lanka within four hours, Pallewatta Gamarala came to Sri Lanka last midnight when a Sri Lankan airline went to Singapore to pick him up from Colombo.

Following the October 26th conspiracy, prime minister and the deputy defense minister has been prohibited to enter the Security Council

Following the October 26th conspiracy the president has not called the Prime Minister or the deputy defense minister to any of the Security Council meetings. Behalf of them Gamarala has included opposition mp’s such Thilanga Sumathipala, Mahinda Amaraweera and Lasantha Alagiyawanna to the meeting.
While Gamarala giving seats to defeated politicians to the Security Council meetings, following his arrival from Singapore, he has denied the cabinet ministers to enter the Security Council and question the heads of the security forces and discuss about the present situation.
People should remember despite keeping an experienced security intelligence chief field marshall Sarath Fonseka in the country, Gamarala always pulverized him to a corner

President has informed the heads of the command forces not to participate Ranil’s Security Council meetings

As Lanka e News reported president Gamarala went outside Sri Lanka without following any protocols and without officially handing over the responsibilities to the defense ministry or to the deputy defense minister. Therefore the government faced a crisis when taking emergency decisions following the explosions.
Following the series of explosions when the Prime Minister Ranil and deputy defense minister Ruwan Wijewardana convened the Security Council at the temple trees. The heads of the armed forces and the defense minister did not attend the meeting. They informed the president has called them and said not to participate for Security Council meetings convened by premier Ranil. Prime Minister after briefing the danger has said if you all cannot come I can come to the defense ministry, and has gone to the defense ministry.  Following the premiers visit to the defense ministry, the defense secretary, commanders of the three armed forces and the IGP came to the defense ministry after an hour. When called the president he first denied to impose curfew but later agreed.

President is a traitor but Ranil is also responsible

From all the incidents above it is very clear that Pallewatta Gamarala is a traitor. Once this traitor violated the constitution and made a 1000 million USD loss for the country. Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe too should bear the responsibility for not ousting from the presidency within an hour
following the illegal conspiracy on October 26th. The premier is exposing now that he and the deputy defense minister was not allowed to participate in the Security Council meetings, following a major catastrophe the country has ever faced. He should have raised this issue in the parliament before and made awareness to the public and to the speaker. He did not do anything as such.

Traitor should be chased

However what is important now is to remove this traitor who did not take any security measures to save the people from this disaster from the presidency as soon as possible. It appears that Gamarala has a habit of hiding himself from catastrophes because he similarly hid himself in a coconut garden in Kurunegala on the day of the presidential election.
This traitor is directly responsible for the 300 lives lost and for the 600 people injured. All patriotic people of the country should come together to chase this traitor who plunged our country to such an economic downfall. If not this traitor Gamarala will drag the country into further crisis.

Chandrapradeep

Translated by Robinhood
---------------------------
by     (2019-04-22 18:40:33)

Easter attacks and the politics of division Reach out to the Muslim communities that now live in fear of backlash

Pic by Pradeep Pathirana-23 April 2019
Questions will keep racing through everyone’s minds. Why Sri Lanka? Why now? Why churches and hotels? Why was Sri Lanka targeted and why was it done?   
Our harrowing history of war, conflict and polarisation, is again on the knife edge and may take a tragic turn.   
Memories of bombings and deaths, attacks on Churches, Mosques and Temples from the past will be rekindled. And those that feed on the politics of polarisation will be emboldened.   
The horror of these Easter attacks, the deaths and injuries, the trauma and fear will shape our future. But we also have a great challenge before us to turn our grief into a future of co-existence.   
Easter Sunday   
Each of us will have a story of this Easter Sunday. Where we were and what we were doing when all hell seemed to break loose. For the Christian community, recalling the preparations, the lent season into Easter, followed by the destructive disruption will be unnerving. The shock of the Easter attacks has traumatised a community in the midst of their worship of celebrating life.   
In my home in Jaffna, we awaited the arrival of the Anglican Priest to give communion to my mother who has dementia and restricted mobility following multiple strokes.   
As we waited for the priest to arrive, the news of the attacks came with phone calls from all over the country and abroad.   
My mother, who could hardly communicate or walk, attempted to stand up and greet the priest. The significance of the priest’s arrival, of receiving communion, was so deeply ingrained in my mother. After the short service, the conversation turned to the tragedy. Each narrated his or her experiences of fear and loss, the July 1983 riots, violence and so on.   
  • Immediately arrest the politics of division
Good Friday   
On Good Friday, two days before Easter, I was at a meeting at the Green Mosque in the Moor Street area in Jaffna. Friends from the Tamil-Muslim Relations Forum, whom I have worked with over the last seven years, sat with a few of us to discuss their challenges with resettlement. The process of return and resettlement has been frustrating and continues to be so for this community even thirty years after their eviction from the north.   
The Muslim community leaders we met with were clear. They spoke of blocks in the resettlement process and an uncooperative administration. They had been abandoned by successive Governments and deceived by promises of politicians. But on one matter they were unwavering; they were confident of their friendships with ordinary Tamils and were certain they could rebuild relations with the Tamil community.   
However, the undercurrents of anti-Muslim rhetoric, the lack of broader initiatives from the Tamil community to ensure the return of the Jaffna Muslims and rebuild a plural Jaffna, worried me as I left the meeting.   
After the short service, the conversation turned to the tragedy. Each narrated his or her experiences of fear and loss, the July 1983 riots
Polarisation and co-existence   
As news reports emerge that some so-called Islamic elements were involved in the Easter attacks, I wonder how we will come together to address the festering polarisation?   
The young priest, as he prepared to leave our home after providing my mother communion, was thinking of the days ahead. Phone calls came to cancel all services and Christian gatherings over the next couple of days.   
The priest was clear and determined in his thoughts. Those who attack do not see the suffering of those who have been killed and maimed, this has been our history, the politics of division, which has torn our country apart, he said.     
The priest’s message was important. The Christian clergy, religious leaders, teachers, community leaders and opinion makers must resolve that we will not let these politics of division overtake us.
As our hearts go out to those whose loved ones have been killed, as well as those injured, devastated and traumatised by these horrible attacks, we must reach out to the Muslim communities that now live in fear of a backlash.
We need to do so immediately to arrest the politics of division and reaffirm our commitment to co-existence. 

Sri Lanka attacks likely the work of Islamist militants: experts

Police officers work at the scene at St. Sebastian Catholic Church, after bomb blasts ripped through churches and luxury hotels on Easter, in Negombo, Sri Lanka April 22, 2019. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha

Kanupriya KapoorJoe Brock-APRIL 22, 2019

JAKARTA/SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Coordinated Easter Sunday bombings at churches and hotels in Sri Lanka bore the hallmarks of militant groups Islamic State or al Qaeda, security experts said on Monday, citing the level of sophistication of the attacks.

No group has claimed responsibility for the explosions, many of them suicide bombings, which killed 290 people and wounded 500 others - the deadliest attack in the island nation since the end of a civil war in 2009.

Experts said the targeting of churches and hotels where foreign tourists stay in Sri Lanka, which endured several suicide bombings targeting government officials and installations during the civil war, was a “new and worrying development” in the predominantly Buddhist country.

“These synchronised attacks are out of the ordinary for Sri Lanka. Compared with similar attacks in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, it has the DNA of attacks carried out by Islamic State and al Qaeda,” said Alto Labetubun, an anti-terrorism expert who has researched the two groups for a decade.

A senior Asian counter-terrorism official who declined to be identified said the attack was likely carried out by a group with “significant operational capability and skilled commanders”.

Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena’s office said intelligence reports indicated foreign terrorist organisations were behind Sri Lankan militants and asked for help from foreign nations.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe acknowledged on Sunday the government had some prior information about possible attacks on churches involving a little-known Islamist group.

Rohan Gunaratna, a Singapore-based security expert, said the Sri Lankan group was the Islamic State branch in Sri Lanka and perpetrators were known to have links to Sri Lankans who travelled to the Middle East to join the hardline group in Syria and Iraq.

‘FOREIGN ACTORS’

Four of the bombs went off at roughly the same time on Sunday, at 8.45 a.m., with two others coming within 20 minutes.

Two other explosions rocked the city in the afternoon. Authorities later found unexploded devices and a van full of explosives in various locations.

The U.S. State Department issued a travel warning that said there was a threat of more attacks.
Churches have been bombed in various parts of Asia and the Middle East over the years.

Last year, there were suicide attacks on churches in the Indonesian city of Surabaya and in the town of Jolo in the Philippines this year. Islamic State claimed responsibility for both those attacks.

Sri Lanka saw frequent suicide bombings before 2009 but ethnic minority Tamil separatist insurgents mostly went for government targets.

Sunday’s attacks marked a shift to churches and places associated with Western interests, experts said.
A history of conflict also means it was possible the perpetrators of Sunday’s attacks had access to weapons and explosives but it was also likely that foreign actors were involved, they said.

“With this scale of attacks, I don’t think this was only carried out by locals. There is most likely involvement of foreign groups or people, including people moving in and out of India or Pakistan,” said terrorism expert Labetubun.

Pratyush Rao, south Asia analyst at the Control Risks consultancy, said explosives were widely available in Sri Lanka.

Police officers work at the scene at St. Sebastian Catholic Church, after bomb blasts ripped through churches and luxury hotels on Easter, in Negombo, Sri Lanka April 22, 2019. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha

“While the scale and sophistication of the attacks suggest an overseas link, there does not appear to be any evidence so far to link it directly to IS,” Rao said.

“It is plausible though that the attacks may have been inspired by IS tactics and ideology.”

Reporting by Kanupriya Kapoor in Jakarta and Joe Brock in Singapore, Additional reporting by Tom Allard in Bangkok; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan, Robert Birsel

The Day After


Dr. Chamindra Weerawardhana
logoOn a day after tragedy of unprecedented proportions has hit one’s people, plunging one’s country into a state of tremendous vulnerability and chaos, it is not easy to pen a word. However, it is crucial to highlight a few key factors that surround the Easter Sunday terror attacks and their aftermath. 
1. National security negligence?
In the admission of the Prime Minister himself, there have been prior Intelligence warnings about a terror incident in the brewing. No significant action was taken. The blame for this squarely lands on the individuals providing political leadership to the state defence apparatus, from the Commander-in-Chief downwards. Sri Lankan security forces and intelligence structures are highly sophisticated, having faced their share of challenges fighting against a secessionist foe in a 30-year civil war. Intelligence officials who flagged the threat must be commended for the diligent warnings issued. 
The political leadership, for its part, resorted to inaction. Why so? 
The logical conclusion one cannot but afford to reach is that the political class, the Executive in particular [as the security forces come under the direct purview of the Executive], did not take action in a ‘deliberate’ move. 
Firstly, Sri Lanka is heading towards national elections, and the political class has a long tradition of seeking to sustain itself from ethnonational tensions, threats to national security, a climate of high insecurity and uncertainty, and of heavy distrust among the different ethnonational communities, in order to sustain their political agendas. It is as if the political class were simply unable to engage in a mature brand of democratic politics in the absence of a threat to national security, coupled with ethnonational tensions. 
If indeed the political class were in dire need for an ‘enemy’ for political reasons, it has now found one, in no uncertain terms. 
Secondly, to reiterate the obvious, no national-level political developments in Sri Lanka take place without direct behind-the-scenes interventions of certain external ‘powers that be’. It is very clear that this attack has been ‘allowed to happen’, in order to create a climate of unprecedented tensions, which would: 
a) Benefit the external powers, as in, the instability of a country facilitates their inroads into that country and its systems, and to strengthen their strategic strongholds in a geo-strategically crucial location in the Indian Ocean.
b) Benefit the local power-wielders, as it would enable them to play the ‘terrorist threat’ card once again, and call for ‘strong leadership’ [read ‘Sinhala majoritarian-nationalist alpha-male-image-presenting leadership]. 
2. The “weak government” narrative 
In the aftermath of this tragedy, there is absolutely no running away whatsoever from the reality that the UNP-led government is a weak government, in terms of national security. True, the defence portfolio comes under their ‘cohabiting political opponent’ the Commander-in-Chief, the President [as a mark of respect to the innocent victims these ruthless attacks, this writer refuses to write the name of Sri Lanka’s current head of state]. However, the UNP has a clear foothold, with a close relative of the Prime Minister holding office as state minister of defence. If the government had a more effective approach of managing the national security brief, these attacks could have been contained, if not averted. 
Public pronouncements of senior government ministers in the aftermath of the attacks are brimming with nothing but hopelessness, a fine dose of cowardice, and the lack of a consistent vision for the country. 
Not only the present government? 
In admitting the above reality, however, we must never lose sight of the fact that threats to national security also occurred under the post-war Rajapaksa administration. Suffice to recall the 2014 Aluthgama incident, and the rise of Bodu Bala Sena. If there were a growing threat of Islamic radicalising, the security forces and Intelligence were well-placed to pursue a nip-in-the-bud approach. 
Instead, the state looked on, as a Sinhala-Buddhist extremist discourse took shape freely, flouting casual islamophobia [the accusation, levelled by some, that Bodu Bala Sena, and other groups such as Ravana Balakaya, were fuelled under the auspices of the defence apparatus, is a factor that requires clarification at some stage]. What can be noted with full certainty is that under the post-war Rajapaksa regime, no outfit of that nature could have raised its head without the knowledge and [implicit or explicit] approbation of those in power.
The result was the growth of ethnoreligious, ethnonational and xenophobic hatred along a  Sinhala-Buddhist vs. Muslim axis, leading to the unfortunate incidents of Aluthgama. In hindsight, Aluthgama 2014 can also be considered as an early sign of the eventual fall of the Rajapaksa administration. Aluthgama was an indication that the tremendous national security prowess achieved by ending the war, and the consequent consolidation of the Rajapaksa power base, were not sufficiently ‘re-oriented’ to suit, and be effective in, a post-war context within a small South Asian island state that is always volatile to external interferences. 
This writer, however, does not blame the Rajapaksa administration. 
Managing national security and external affairs of a small country with tremendous geo-strategic significance in the Indian Ocean region is no easy task. It becomes even more challenging when the strategies, structures, approaches, principles and objectives all require a fulsome overhaul, after three long decades of civil war and national security uncertainties. The Rajapaksa administration failed in this test, which is why it could be ousted, through a cautiously crafted regime change operation, in January 2015. 

Read More

Poignant pondering on a patriarch


logo

Monday, 22 April 2019

Almost five months have gone. It is with a profound sense of sadness that we experienced the demise of our veteran teacher, respected author, legal luminary, an accomplished ambassador, an eminent public servant and an amazing human being, Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria.
He was a patriarch for the Postgraduate Institute of Management (PIM), passionately involving in multiple fronts for the progress of it during the past two decades, as a longstanding member of the Board of Management, Board of Study and the Faculty. This column attempts to capture his invaluable contribution, both intellectually and interactively to the country in general and to the PIM in specific.

Overview

“Silently, one by one, in the infinite meadows of heaven,

Blossomed the lovely stars, the forget-me-nots of the angels.”

- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Evangeline: A Tale of Acadie

As the above stated quote from Longfellow highlights, great men and women on earth fade to this world and ‘blossom in heaven’. We witness the untimely demise of late Prof. Uditha Liyanage, the legendary marketing guru of Sri Lanka. Then the sought-after Economics scholar of Sri Lanka Dr. Saman Kelegama. Now, PIM misses another great giant of it, in fact, one of its patriarchs.

The word patriarch is typically associated with a caring fatherly figure. Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria was exactly such for us. He was the mentor for late Prof. Uditha Liyanage, who indeed was my mentor. Let me sincerely share some glimpses of the prolific performance of Dr. Weerasooria, in adding vital value to PIM. I prefer to use five Ps, namely provider, producer, proposer, protector and preventer.

He was a provider for us

Dr. Weerasooria provided his rare knowledge in the realms of business law. Having authored over 20 books including the seminal legal publication in Australia, we were so privileged to be partners of his wonderful knowledge sharing process. There were always bouquets and never a brickbat with regards to his teaching contribution.

I have seen his vibrancy as a speaker standing tall behind the podium with stature and stamina in capturing a student audience for hours. I have also seen him coming with a stick and feebly confining to a chair, still with the amazing capability of captivating the crowd with solid learning filled with personal experiences and prolific humour. He was such a passionate learning provider for all of us at PIM.

He was a producer for us

I recall with gratitude the immense contribution of him in producing the amended PIM ordinance. The first ordinance that came into effect in 1986 paved way for the creation of the one and only premier postgraduate entity dedicated to management in Sri Lanka. As time passed by, we observed some aspects of our ordinance that needed to be revised based on changing times. One such key area was the composition of the board of management that comprised of 20 members.

When the University Grants Commission (UGC) initiated the task of amending the existing ordinances of the postgraduate institutes in Sri Lanka, the co-chairmen of the project were UGC Vice Chairman Prof. P.S.M. Gunarathne and UGC member Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria. With his ardent efforts with collective consensus, the PIM ordinance was the first to be successfully amended, paving way towards exemplary governance.

He was a proposer for us

Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria was a man of ideas. He proposed a variety of suggestions and participated to ensure the implementation of them. One glorious tribute to him is the creation of this sought-after magazine as the associate editor. ‘Professional Manager’ stands tall as the only Sri Lankan publication by a higher education institute of such kind.

I still recall how he proposed to have a dedicated issue of Professional Manager in honour of late Prof. Uditha Liyanage. He not only suggested the idea, but guided us and contributed through a comprehensive article as well. He was the first to propose a similar act, in the event of the sad demise of Dr. Saman Kelegama. Again, he assisted us in obtaining a rare collection of articles from the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) and also arranged a solemn event to hand over the first copy to late Dr. Kelegama’s family.

He was a protector for us

The term patriarch involves a fatherly protection as well.  He being an eminent public servant and an influential personality had always been for our progress. He openly praised the PIM for being the only self-financial state higher education institute for the past 20 years. He spoke on behalf of us in many crucial occasions where misunderstandings could have marred our progress.

Closure of the PIM Centre in the Knowledge Village, the United Arab Emirates is one such example. Now we can be truly happy that the role he played has payed way for us to have vibrant MBA learning groups through a revamped lean approach, not only in the UAE, but Qatar, Oman, Kuwait and Bangladesh as well. He also defended us, as a member of the Audit and Management Committee of the PIM’s Board of Management, in the face of unreasonable audit queries generated through uninformed assumptions.

He was a preventer for us

Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria was a passionate member of both the Board of Study and Board of Management of the PIM. In numerous occasions where delicate decision making was required, he prevented us from moving away from our strategic direction. For him, the institution had always been above the individuals.

He appeared on behalf of PIM in several key legal battles, and ensured that the fare justice prevailed. He was a meaningful mediator during a particular time where misunderstandings paved way for personality clashes between two key personalities involving the PIM and our parent university. He prevented the perishing of PIM due to short-cited actions of some influential individuals.

Professional Manager to the forefront

The PIM compiled a comprehensive collection of memoirs of a mighty personality through its flagship publication, Professional Manager. It is a fitting tribute as Dr. Weerasooria was the co-initiator and the Associate Editor of Professional Manager. Much has been said about the lacuna created by the leaving of a legal legendary.

As a patriarch for the PIM, he passionately contributed in multiple fronts including the proliferation of contemporary management thoughts through the Professional Manager magazine. The 16th issue of Professional Manager is aptly devoted to its Associate Editor with much admiration. 

It was indeed satisfying to see how like-minded professionals came forward to share their experiences in interacting with this remarkable human being. The myriad collection of articles contained in this issue is an ample testimony for how much he has touch the hearts and minds of many an individual.

The viewpoints expressed herein contain a varied range of experiences inclusive of relations, friends, colleagues and students. The way they have shared their sincere thoughts itself is a serene insight as to how Dr. Weerasooria has inspired them.

Moving beyond the volume of valued thoughts, a key factor needs to be emphasised. Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria had a deep sense of appreciation of PIM. He passionately showed it through his words and deeds in citing PIM as an exemplary learning institution to the nation.

He firmly believed in the PIM’s potential of progressing as the only self-financed higher education entity of the state sector. When we unveiled the vision of PIM to be a ‘centre of management excellence in South Asia’ and the mission of ‘igniting human imagination by way of producing leaders with global presence and local pulse’, his blessings were very much with us.

I remember with gratitude the committed role played by him in enhancing the two commemorative issues of Professional Manager magazine dedicated for Late Prof. Uditha Liyanage and Late Dr. Saman Kelegama.

He not only wrote the lead article in each of them, but also ensured the appropriate inclusion of rare photographs obtained from the respective families through his influence. His invaluable guidance to enhance the editorials was inspiring to me as a life-long learner. In fact, I was so privileged to be guided by such an eminent author of over twenty textbooks including the seminal ‘Weerasooria’s Banking Law of Australia’.

Path ahead 

“To live in hearts we leave behind is not to die”, so said Thomas Campbell. Same is very true of the Sage who left us. Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria will remain in our memories though his wonderful collection of books and the recollection of all his inspiring ideas. We need many more icons of his stature for the generations to come. Among many shallow figure who bloat and boast of their few achievements, we saw a man with stature who showed his principles in practice.

We at PIM are indeed committed to perform as he envisioned, in truly being the nation’s Management Mentor. May Dr. Weerasooria attain the supreme bliss of Nibbana.

(Prof. Ajantha Dharmasiri can be reached through director@pim.sjp.ac.lk, ajantha@ou.edu or www.ajanthadharmasiri.info.)

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Israeli court upholds expulsion of human rights defender

Israeli judge upholds expulsion of Human Rights Watch’s Jerusalem director over advocacy calling on businesses to end complicity in Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land.Mahfouz Abu TurkAPA images


Ali Abunimah -18 April 2019
An Israeli court on Tuesday upheld a government decision to expel Omar Shakir, the director of the Jerusalem office of Human Rights Watch. The court based its ruling on a 2017 law that bars entry to people who advocate for a boycott of Israel or its settlements in occupied territory.
This comes as the campaign to stop international firms from profiting from Israel’s settlements scored several new successes.
“In a new and dangerous interpretation of the law, the court found that Human Rights Watch research and advocacy calling for businesses to stop facilitating abuses in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank constitutes a call for boycott,” the New York-based organization stated.
The ruling sets a precedent that could hamper the work of other advocacy organizations and jeopardize the status of other rights workers in Israel.”
According to Human Rights Watch, this is the first case in which the Israeli government has relied on the 2017 amendment of its so-called Law of Entry to expel a person who is present in the country lawfully, as far as Israel is concerned.
The court claimed that Shakir has called for boycotts since he was a student activist in the United States more than a decade ago, as well as his subsequent work promoting Human Rights Watch’s research on the activities of businesses, including global tourism companies Airbnb and Booking.com, that participate in and profit from Israel’s theft of Palestinian property.
Human Rights Watch has stated that companies that do business in Israel’s settlements inevitably benefit from and contribute to Israel’s policies “that dispossess, discriminate against, and abuse the human rights” of millions Palestinians.
Following Tuesday’s court ruling Human Rights Watch reasserted its position that “businesses should halt their activities in illegal West Bank settlements.”

Setbacks for settlements

Businesses that operate in Israeli settlements – all of which are illegal under international law – are coming under increasing global pressure to stop aiding colonization of occupied land.
In what the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee (BNC) called a “significant victory,” FNV, the largest trade union in the Netherlands with more than one million members, has dropped HP as a partner in discount offers to its members.
“As long as we do not know for certain that HP is not complicit in human rights abuses, we will no longer include them as an offer in FNV membership offers,” the union informed members.
HP – also known as Hewlett-Packard – has long been a focus of activists because HP-branded businesses have supplied the Israeli military with racial profiling technology for its checkpoints restricting the movement of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.
And this week it emerged that France-based insurance and financial giant AXA quietly divested last year from Israeli arms maker Elbit.
AXA is facing an ongoing campaign to divest from all Israeli companies involved in violations, including Israel’s top banks that finance settlements.


.@AXA IM divests from Israel's @ElbitSystemsLtd

The @SumOfUs_Fr @Campagnebds campaign against AXA's problematic investments continues, as an AXA subsidiary remains linked to Elbit, and AXA maintains investments in Israeli banks which finance settlementshttp://bit.ly/2KJybfT 


La Campagne BDS France se félicite de la décision d’@AXA de se retirer, en partie, d’Elbit Systems mais appelle le groupe d’assurance à mettre un terme à TOUS ses investissements complices de l’apartheid israélien. Communiqué de @SumOfUs_Fr : https://frama.link/VV39xc1L 



View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Dans le cadre de la journée internationale d’action en direction d’@AXA complice de l’apartheid israélien, les militant·e·s de Lyon ont mené 2 actions, dans le centre-ville et devant l’immeuble de l’assureur | via @palestine69

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Les militant·e·s de Marseille ont participé à la journée internationale d’action en direction d’@AXA, complice de l’apartheid israélien. Elles·ils ont distribué des tracts et ont fait signer des cartes, qui seront envoyées à la direction.
International banking giant HSBC also divested from Elbit last year following a grassroots campaign.
And this week, Palestinians are stepping up their campaign demanding that sportswear company PUMA end its sponsorship of football teams based in Israeli settlements.


Today @Puma shareholders are gathering for its Annual General Meeting.

Stand with 200+ Palestinian sports teams urging Puma to end its support for illegal Israeli settlements pushing Palestinian families off their land.

Pledge to : https://buff.ly/2ZdYoGC 

No distinction

Human Rights Watch does not explicitly support the broader BDS – boycott, divestment and sanctions – movement for Palestinian rights. But the group notes that in the ruling to expel Shakir, the Israeli judge “held that Israel’s anti-boycott law does not distinguish between boycotts directed at Israel and those directed at only West Bank settlements.”
Israel’s interior ministry and strategic affairs ministry began their effort to expel Shakir last May, ordering him out of the country within 14 days. But the decision was stayed pending court appeals by Human Rights Watch.
The strategic affairs ministry, which leads Israel’s well-funded effort to combat the growing global movement in support of Palestinian rights, compiled a dossier of Shakir’s activities, which it said demonstrates his support for BDS.
Most activities listed in the dossier predate Shakir’s employment with Human Rights Watch and relate to his activism as a student at Stanford University, calling for full and equal rights for Palestinians.
One pretext cited in the dossier for expelling Shakir is that he shared on Twitter an article written by scholar Steven Salaita and published by The Electronic Intifada in 2014:

15 people are talking about this

srael’s attempts to deport Omar Shakir are part of its broader efforts to prevent human rights defenders from witnessing and documenting human rights violations, as well as to stifle any opposition to those abuses,” the Center for Constitutional Rights stated Wednesday.
The civil liberties group noted that last year Israel prohibited its executive director Vince Warren and board chair Katherine Franke from entering Israeli-controlled territory on political grounds.
The Gaza-based human rights group Al-Mezan condemned the Israeli court decision as “a serious escalation of the legislative and judicial attacks by Israel against human rights defenders, despite the legitimacy of their work and their use of peaceful means such as research and advocacy to protect rights guaranteed by international conventions.”
The Israeli judge ordered Shakir out of the country by 1 May, but said implementation would be delayed while the legal process continues.
Human Rights Watch is appealing the ruling to Israel’s high court.
Israel’s attempts to silence human rights defenders appear to have the support of the United States government, which earlier this month barred entry to Omar Barghouti, a co-founder of the BDS movement, despite the fact that he had a valid visa.

The American Civil Liberties Union called the US government’s “ideological exclusion” of Barghouti “political censorship” and a violation of the First Amendment.