Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, March 11, 2019


Tens of thousands of Algerians from a cross-section of society have taken to the streets to protest President Abdelaziz Bouteflika’s bid to seek a fifth term in the April 18 elections, posing the most serious threat yet to his 20-year reign.

No photo description available. 

Bouteflika, first elected in 1999, has made only rare public appearances in a wheelchair since suffering a stroke in 2013. His last public address was made in 2014.

But his announcement in mid-February that he would seek a fifth term despite his fragile health angered many across Algerian society. A third round of weekend protests and a general strike greeted his return from a medical visit to Switzerland on Sunday, with shops in the capital Algiers remaining closed while public transport was suspended.

“Today we came to fight for our rights," one demonstrator told FRANCE 24. "Our right to education, our right to a better future. We don’t want to be left behind.”
The Algerian diaspora have also been rallying in France and other European cities to demand that Bouteflika stand down.

The anger is hardly surprising, especially in light of the crippling economic hardship facing the country. The unemployment rate is approximately 12%, and more than a quarter of Algerians under the age of 30 are jobless.

Sharp rises in the price of basic items such as sugar, oil and flour have also hit Algerian's hard, with increases of between 20 and 30 percent seen in the first few months of 2019 alone.

Many of the protests are aimed at Algeria’s stagnant political system, which has long been dominated by veterans of Algeria’s war of independence against France (1954-1962). Bouteflika introduced largescale infrastructure programmes during the rise in oil prices between 2004 and 2014, however, the oil-dependent economy took a hit from the subsequent decline in crude prices. This further fuelled fury with how the country was being run.

Bouteflika’s ruling National Liberation Front (FLN) party has urged all sides to unite to end the unrest, Ennahar state TV reported.

Algeria's Bouteflika: A 'phantom head of state'

Is the army changing sides?

Amplifying the pressure on Bouteflika was an apparent about-face on Sunday by a member of Bouteflika’s inner circle, Army Chief of Staff Gaid Salah. Speaking to a group of Algerian military schools, Salah did not mention the unrest specifically but said the army shares “the same values and principles” as the Algerian people and are "partners in one destiny".

Salah had previously expressed disdain for the protests, dismissing them as “dubious” calls “allegedly for democracy” but aimed at "pushing Algerians towards the unknown".

His reversal could be a significant sign that Bouteflika may not survive today’s protests the way he has weathered those in the past.

Francis Ghilès, an associate senior researcher at the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs and an expert on North Africa, noted that the demonstrations now rocking Algeria are the biggest since those proclaiming Algeria’s independence in July 1962, calling them an “earthquake”.

Asked whether Bouteflika’s government is now “panicking”, Ghilès told FRANCE 24: “I think they are panicking … when you look at who is demonstrating, when you see the former veterans’ association leaving Bouteflika, you really get the impression of rats leaving the ship.”

Ghilès noted that, so far, the protests have been mostly peaceful and have avoided undue “provocations” – and the police have been measured in their response. Whether that is because officers have received orders to this effect or because they themselves are also fed up remains to be seen, he said.

Ghilès said there is likely to be burgeoning unrest within the ranks of the army itself.

The army chief of staff, General Salah, and many others at the highest ranks are “immensely corrupt”, he said. But the Algerian military is a professional army with thousands of educated officers who are “professional, solid, honest”, he said.

This dichotomy must be causing “many tensions” within the military sector.

“The people around Bouteflika... it’s a Mafia," said Ghilès. "That’s the only word one can use.”

“They will try to protect their ill-begotten gains.”

But even some members of the president’s FLN party have joined the protests calling for him to step down.Ghilès noted that the Algerian unrest may have already passed the point of no return.
“When you get crowds of this size in the street, I’m not sure you can actually turn the page back. I don’t think you can go back to the statu quo ante,” he said.

“We are certainly at an extraordinarily important moment.”

>> Video: Algeria braced for nationwide strikes, interview with Francis Ghilès
No clear successor

Bouteflika earned widespread respect from many Algerians for his role in ending the country’s decade-long civil war, which erupted in 1992 when a host of Islamist rebel groups took up arms against the government.

The conflict, which killed an estimated 150,000-200,000 people, still weighs on the Algerian mindset, with many prioritising political stability over civil rights concerns.

Rights groups have long accused Bouteflika of being authoritarian in his efforts to undermine workers’ ability to form unions, crackdowns on peaceful protests, and measures in the penal code that restrict free expression, including prison terms for disseminating information that might harm the “national interest” or that is deemed insulting to the president, army or other state institutions.

And yet he remained in power even as the 2011 “Arab Spring” unseated longtime leaders across the region.

With any possible successor likely needing the support of the military as well as Algeria’s elites, no one has thus far emerged who seems poised to take the reins after Bouteflika’s nearly two decades in power.

The president’s 61-year-old brother Said is the man who now stands closest to the presidency and who reportedly controls access to the ailing Bouteflika. General Salah is another possible contender.

A third name that has surfaced is that of veteran Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi, a former foreign affairs minister who was the UN and Arab League special envoy to Syria until May 2014. Brahimi became well known on the international stage when he was the UN special representative to Afghanistan both during and after Taliban rule. He also served as the UN special envoy to Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

Another former minister of foreign affairs, Ramtane Lamamra, has also been touted as a possible future leader. A career diplomat, Lamamra has acted as a mediator for several conflicts in Africa and has served as Algeria’s ambassador to Djibouti, Ethiopia and the United States.

Profile: Algeria's Abdelaziz Bouteflika

Khan Offers Dialogue; Will Modi Accept The “Olive Branch” To Restore Peace?


Latheef Farook
logoPakistan PM Imran Khan offers dialogue to end Kashmir bleeding; Will Indian PM Modi accept this “Olive branch” to restore peace?
The Palwama tragedy in Kashmir on 14 February once again reminded New Delhi and the world that Kashmiri issue cannot be solved by brutalizing its people. It also brought to light the dangerous growing military ties between Israel and the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi – known for their war crimes against Muslims.
Modi’s government claims that Kashmir is an integral part of India despite all India’s pledges since the subcontinent’s partition in 1947 to decide the destiny of Kashmir by a plebiscite.
However Modi has ignored all these pledges. His BJP claim Kashmir as integral part of India whose border is with Afghanistan. 
Modi and his Hindutva forces were fully backed by Israel. Thus the continuous military oppression. When Kashmiris rose up last year Modi rained pellets on them blinding thousands who are forced to suffer rest of their lives.
India had seventy long years to win the hearts and minds of Kashmiris and convince them that they could live in peace and harmony with rest of India. Unfortunately all Indian government’s failed miserably. They were not sincere in solving the Kashmiri issue but simply hoodwinked the world without implementing it’s by pledges.
In an interview with a British newspaper late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi said in 1986 that ’India lost Kashmir due to its atrocities on Kashmiris”. These atrocities were intensified ever since Modi was elected to power. This was facilitated by the international anti-Muslim environment created by US-Europe and Israel associating Islam and Muslims with terrorism and describing even Muslim freedom struggle as terrorism.

The result was the Palwama tragedy. Such tragedies are likely to continue until Indian oppression ends.
Modi made a mockery of himself when he declared that Indian Air Force killed 300 Jaish e Mohammed cadres though no such killing took pace. Indian media which brought BJP to power with its deceptive campaign also suffered loss of credibility when it continues to highlight Modi’s lies.
Palwama tragedy also brought to light the growing military ties between Modi’s government and Israel in the atrocities on Kashmiris. For example veteran British journalist Robert Fisk in his article days after Palwama tragedy had this to state;
“For months, Israel has been assiduously lining itself up alongside India’s nationalist BJP government in an unspoken – and politically dangerous – “anti-Islamist” coalition, an unofficial, unacknowledged alliance, while India itself has now become the largest weapons market for the Israeli arms trade.
Not by chance, therefore, has the Indian press just trumpeted the fact that Israeli-made Rafael Spice-2000 “smart bombs” were used by the Indian air force in its strike against Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) “terrorists” inside Pakistan.
Describing Pulwama tragedy as a wake up all for peace in the region respected Indian activist and columnist Ram Puniyani had this to state;
Following the attack, developments taking place on the ground across the country are disturbing. There are reports that Kashmiri students have been threatened in various cities in several states. Tathagat Roy, the Governor of Meghalaya has given the call to boycott Kashmiris. 
A deliberate attempt is being made by Hindutva groups like Bajrang Dal, Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bharatiya Janata Party supporters to whip up nationalistic passions with chants of ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’, waving of the tricolour, giving slogans against Pakistan, and associating Pakistan with Muslims. The likes of Anupam Kher and Sonu Nigam are spewing anger against secular and liberal people. At several places, vigilante groups are threatening Muslims. The situation in Jammu required the imposition of curfew as the threat to Muslims was palpable in the area. The BJP’s state chief of J&K Ravindra Raina and MP Jugal Kishore took part in the protests targeting the Muslims.  
The violence has left Kashmiri Muslims living in Jammu and other parts of India fearful. India has the world’s third largest Muslim population after Indonesia and Pakistan – upward of 180 million people.
The creation of an atmosphere of retaliation is worsening the situation. It is a short sighted response. The present atmosphere where Muslims are feeling insecure and Kashmiris are being targeted is worsening the situation. We do need to give an atmosphere of security and amity to all our citizens. An appeal of harmony from the top may restrain the communal elements who in their display of hyper nationalism are creating a situation which violates the principle of fraternity, the foundation of our nation and the base of our Constitution.  
The fear is whether Modi will unleash countrywide violence against Muslims as L.K.Advani once did with his infamous Rath Yatra, whipped up hatred and killed thousands of Muslims before exploiting the atmosphere to demolish the Babri Masjid.
 Meanwhile Amarjit Singh Dulat, retired chief of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and former Special Director of the Intelligence Bureau (I.B.), alludes to the lack of maturity in the present government’s retaliation policies. He suggests that the only way forward in India-Pakistan relations is through a sensible long-term diplomatic approach

Bolsonaro under fire for smearing reporter who covered scandal involving his son

‘Bolsonaro is Fake News’ became a top hashtag in Brazil after president shared ‘false information’ to attack a journalist
 Leading newspapers, the Brazilian Investigative Journalism Association and the Brazilian Bar Association, criticised Jair Bolsonaro for sharing ‘false information’. Photograph: Evaristo Sa/AFP/Getty Images

 in Rio de Janeiro-
Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro has provoked a storm of protest after sharing fake news to attack a journalist who has covered a scandal involving a former aide of his son Flávio, a senator who is also under investigation for money laundering.

Leading newspapers, the Brazilian Investigative Journalism Association and the Brazilian Bar Association, criticised the far-right president for sharing a “misrepresentation” and “false information”.

Bolsonaro launched his attack on Sunday night in a tweet with short audio excerpts of a conversation between Constança Rezende, a reporter at the Estado de S Paulo newspaper, and an unnamed man. The president accused her of seeking his impeachment and wanting to “ruin” the life of his son Flávio.

But in the excerpts Bolsonaro shared, Rezende did no such thing. Speaking in halting English, she can be heard saying the case against the president’s son was “ruining” Bolsonaro – who campaigned on an anti-graft, tough-on-crime platform. Rezende also says the case could lead to the president’s impeachment and expressed her fear that investigations may not advance.

In the same tweet, Bolsonaro also mentioned Rezende’s father, Chico Otávio – an investigative journalist from rival paper O Globo who investigates criminal gangs that have also been linked to Flávio Bolsonaro.

The president accused Rezende and Otávio of wanting to “defeat the government with blackmail, disinformation and leaks”. A spokeswoman for the president said Bolsonaro refused to comment on Monday. Rezende and Otávio also declined to comment.

“This shows not just a lack of commitment to the truth of the facts, which is serious enough in itself, but also the use of his position of power to try to intimidate media vehicles and journalists,” the Brazilian Society of Investigative Journalism and Brazilian Bar Association said on Monday.

After Bolsonaro’s tweet on Sunday, the hashtag “Estado Lies” became the top trending topic on Twitter. But by Monday, “Bolsonaro is Fake News” had replaced it among top hashtags in Brazil.

Estado is a conservative newspaper founded in 1875 that has published heavily critical editorials of recent Bolsonaro controversies, such as his tweetof a pornographic video of a sex act during carnival.

“The president shared and endorsed incorrect information, which is serious,” said João Caminoto, Estado’s director of journalism. “It is an attack on journalism and consequently an attack on democracy.”

He said Rezende gave a telephone interview to a person claiming to be a student named Alex MacAllister who said he was doing a comparative study between Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro.

The interview first emerged in a blogpost by a French film-maker and was republished on Sunday by a pro-Bolsonaro website called Terça Livre, in an article written by the press secretary of a state deputy from Bolsonaro’s PSL party.

Before being elected to the senate last year, Flávio Bolsonaro was a lawmaker in Rio’s state legislature. Rezende has previously reported on an investigation into “atypical” financial movements involving staff of 22 state legislature deputies and former deputies, including Flávio Bolsonaro’s then aide Fabrício Queiroz. Both men have denied any wrongdoing.

“There is nothing illegal,” Flávio Bolsonaro said in a January TV interview. Queiroz earlier said he made money doing business deals.

Flávio Bolsonaro is also being investigated for money laundering in a separate case. “He is a victim of political persecution,” his spokesperson told the Antagonista site, and “repudiates the attempt to impute irregularities and crime where there are none”.

Rezende’s father, Otávio, has separately reported on a criminal “militia”.

One of the gang’s leaders was a fugitive former police captain, Adriano da Nóbrega, whose wife and mother were members of Flávio Bolsonaro’s staff until last year.

Police also suspect a gang with links to Da Nóbrega was involved in the unsolved murder of the leftist councillor Marielle Franco last year. While a state deputy, Flávio Bolsonaro arranged an official “motion of praise” for Da Nóbrega and another member of the gang.

In a TV interview in January, Flávio Bolsonaro said he was suffering a “great political persecution”.

On Monday, Mediapart, the French website which originally hosted the interview distanced itself from the blogpost. “The information published in the ‘Mediapart club’, which served as the base for the tweet from @jairbolsonaro, is false. The article is the responsibility of the author and the blog is independent from the newspaper’s newsroom,” it said in a tweet in Portuguese.

Caminoto said Estado’s main concern was for their reporter’s safety.

“She had to suspend her social media accounts, her cellphone number was released, she received veiled threats. We respond with journalism,” Caminoto said.

Seven Britons among 157 killed in Ethiopian Airlines crash

10 Mar 2019
Seven Britons are among the dead after a plane crashed shortly after take off this morning in Ethiopia. There were 149 passengers and eight crew members on board. There are no reported survivors.
The Ethiopian Airlines flight from Addis Ababa to Nairobi in Kenya came down just minutes into the journey.
The Ethiopian Government confirmed that people from at least 35 different countries were on board the flight.
The cause of the crash is not yet known and the investigation will look at a distress call made by the captain shortly before it came down.
The plane was reportedly new, having been delivered to the airline in November.
Harry Smith has this report.

Kim-summit failure may suit Trump

US liberal media and Democratic Party-centre are fast losing traction


article_image
Kumar David- 

Many in the US justifiably believed that Trump fled from home because the heat was turning up. His former long-time attorney Michael Cohen testifying before Congress, as expected made a blistering attack, casting his former boss as "a con man", "racist" and "cheat". Multiple investigations have turned the presidency into a nightmare. The Mueller Report due soon may tie him to collusion with Russia. The foreign policy scene is chaotic; he threatened to remove Venezuela’s Maduro but he finds himself on a sticky wicket because the military is clinging to the discredited dud; his off the cuff promises to pull out of Syria and Afghanistan have become problematic; the trade-war with China is stuck. The American President needed escape from this purgatory.

The most serious confrontation is with Congress and will turn into a constitutional crisis. Trump demanded $5.6 billion to build his infamous Wall on the Mexican border; Congress refused, he responded by declaring a spurious Emergency which allows him to grab funds from other sources (e.g. monies lying in crevices in the military budget). Congress declared the Emergency proclamation a hoax and voted to annul it. He will veto that and bipartisan proponents will not be able to muster the two-thirds majority required to override a veto. He will then snatch funds from wherever possible and a constitutional crisis will pave the way to the 2020 congressional and presidential elections.

It is against this domestic backdrop that we need to ponder the long-term consequences of the first (Singapore) love-in and second (Hanoi) estrangement. The US media view is that these are exercises in distracting attention from fiascos in the domestic arena and not of much value to the US. It is fantasy, it reckons to imagine NK’s capabilities can be neutralized; at the moment there is a freeze on all tests but this can be reversed at a moment’s notice and NK is continuing to build nuclear and missile capability. A deal leaving a significant portion of NK’s nuclear-tipped missiles in place would rob the US of leverage. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a think-tank based in Washington says "NK has at least 13 operating missile bases that it has not declared with the ability to launch missiles reaching the continental US even after American air strikes. After extensive research, including interviews with NK defectors and US intelligence officials, it appears NK currently has 15-20 missile operating bases".

US strategists concerned that Trump, eager for an agreement because of other woes, would give too much for too little in return, are now relieved that he walked away and restored the status-anti. NK wanted two things, a peace declaration officially ending the Korean War and the lifting of sanctions. The former removes the threat of regime change and encourages the reduction of U.S. troops in South Korea. Sanctions relief would allow NK, a country with great economic potential, to pursue profitable projects with the South and joint ventures with global investors. The negotiating game went like this: US officials including Mike Pompeo and Nikki Haley, former UN ambassador, insisted on "complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization" before scaling back UN Security Council sanctions restricting external trade to humanitarian assistance and small quantities of fuel. Pyongyang asked for "phased and synchronised denuclearization", meaning sanctions would be gradually relaxed or dropped in step with denuclearization, rather than waiting till its completion. It was deadlock.

Liberal media and Democratic Party in a flop

Painting on a wider canvas than merely the collapse of the Trump-Kim summit, a big picture is emerging. The relentless onslaught on Trump as idiosyncratic, dishonest, narcissistic and a bad president, is justified; the adjectives are true. However, the blitzkrieg has done what damage it can do and is not injuring him any further. The Trump-Base, perhaps 25% of the electorate is not budging in loyalty. Nor will the failure of the summit impact negatively on Trump’s ratings as reverting to the pre-Singapore status quo has its domestic supporters. I can’t estimate reliably, but say another 40 to 50% of Americans have no faith in Congress, the Democratic Party (DP), the Republican Party and politicians of all hues. If Americans learn Sinhala the axiom "ung okkoma kalakanniyo" could become an Americanism.

I detect a profound shift in the DP. There is an unmistakeable leftward shift; how they talk, the people in focus and the hollowing out of its centre. The 2018 elections shot a bunch of radical Democrats into the House of Reps; many young, many women including Alexandria Octavia Cortez who I brought to the attention of Lankan readers 10 months ago when she was not recognised even by the US media. She made the cover of the Economist only last month. Bernie Sanders announced his presidential candidacy three weeks ago; within a week he raised $10 million in small donations and is taking town-hall meetings by storm. Other DP hopefuls are shifting their talk and their walk; suddenly healthcare for all, student debt, tax policy and a minimum wage are hot topics. Oh dear reader, I do appreciate that as when I drew your attention to the decline of alt-right populism, so too till ‘scholars’ and the western media "announce" it, you won’t take notice of what I say. No problem; nevertheless there is a big shift in the DP’s works.

What after the failure?

Kim wants the world to get comfortable with the idea of NK in possession of a nuclear arsenal. He is not going to throw away decades of research; it’s naive to think he will do so except in exchange for huge economic concessions and watertight security guarantees. The US negotiated because it was alarmed by NK’s capabilities; furthermore, in the eyes of American strategists both Kim and their own leader are unstable. Kim needed to leave Hanoi with a signed agreement and NK was casting the summit as a success even before it happened. Some claim, though I doubt it, that it was willing to give away everything including all the facilities at Yongbyon. Pyongyang is hard to read but the stunning collapse must have been unexpected and left NK’s team of seasoned negotiators bewildered. Trump claimed that NK demanded all sanctions be lifted at once but NK then took the extraordinary step of calling its own press conference to insist it only asked for gradual easing.

A summary of NK’s weapons capabilities goes like this. Throughout 2017, NK tested missiles demonstrating rapid advances in military technology. KN-17 (Hwasong-12), range of 4,500km (2,800 miles), can reach the US base in Guam; KN-20 (Hwasong-14), range 10,000km, is an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching New York; finally KN-22 (Hwasong-15) puts the entire United States within range. The US has advanced interceptor technologies in its arsenal but if even one nuclear tipped missile reaches a big US city it’s doomsday for America. The yield of the 3 September 2017 nuclear test, most experts estimate, was 100+ kilotons – more than five ‘Hiroshimas’.

The two Kores remain officially at war as no peace treaty has been signed. An armistice was entered into in 1953 and a Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) established by the UN (USA), China and North Korea. Behind the DMZ and beyond the reach of US and SK artillery, NK’s missiles have the ability to destroy two-thirds of South Korea’s industrial and critical infrastructure.

Although there are reports that NK’s economy has improved in the last five years, others say prosperity is visible only in Pyongyang and confined to the well-to-do classes. The countryside is still said to be dirt poor though food shortages have eased after the bumper harvest of 2014. As recently as January 2018, UNICEF launched a $16.5 million emergency relief package while the government funnelled a quarter of its revenue into military programmes! South Korea is the country most alarmed by NK’s military capability and is shaken by the collapse of the Hanoi summit. South Korean President Moon Jae-in is on record last year saying "Chairman Kim has repeatedly expressed his strong will to denuclearize; he wants to focus on economic development".

But we are not back to square-one because a US military strike at NK is no longer thinkable and war on the Korean Peninsula is near impossible in the foreseeable future. Kim will keep his bombs and missiles for now and presumably be smart enough not to carry out any more tests. The downside for him is that US enforced sanctions remain in place. So his obvious game ploy is to convince China and Russia, and more discreetly South Korea and Japan that he went a long way offering concessions that the US rejected. China and South Korea are critical; the former can turn a blind eye to sanctions evading goods transported into NK by rail and South Korea is keen to improve economic conditions in the North, the one sure road to lasting peace. The overall scorecard at this point in time reads Kim 2, Trump 1; 3 in total, so some progress has been made on a tinderbox issue though to appearances the summit collapsed.

How will this play in the bigger global picture. The two principal issues that will determine the future of the world in the Twenty-first Century are Climate Change and Sino-American relations. The US-NK drama is, comparatively, a storm in a teacup. The US is embroiled more deeply than it need have been because of Trump’s unnecessary fireworks in 2017. China on the other hand is sitting on the side-lines and contemplating how to best exploit things. Naturally it is worried about a nuclear-armed missile-capable North Korea on its doorstep but on the political side it is pleased that the US and Japan continue to be tied up in knots and need Beijing as a go between. Ah well, the world most likely will keep going round and round as usual.

Air Force’s $166 Billion Budget Would Help Revamp U.S. Nuclear Deterrent

A B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber flies over the Indian Ocean after completing a mission over Iraq on March 27, 2003. (Cherie A. Thurlby/U.S. Air Force/Getty Images)
A B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber flies over the Indian Ocean after completing a mission over Iraq on March 27, 2003. (Cherie A. Thurlby/U.S. Air Force/Getty Images) 


BY 
| 
No photo description available.The White House is requesting $166 billion for the U.S. Air Force in its latest budget request, out this week, a sizable 6 percent increase over last year that the service will put in part towards revamping its pieces of America’s nuclear deterrent.

The Air Force’s budget roadmap includes a significant hike in funding for research and development, which will support the branch’s efforts to replace its nuclear bombers as well as land-based and air-launched missiles, two sources with knowledge of the service’s budget told Foreign Policy. The service is asking Congress for $35.4 billion for research and development this year, a 16.4 percent increase from last year, one of the sources said.

This money, if approved, will be put toward development of the service’s new nuclear stealth bomber, Northrop Grumman’s B-21 “Raider;’ its replacement for the Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missile; and a new air-launched nuclear cruise missile to arm the older B-52 bomber. All of these new weapons are in early stages of development.

The funding will also go to building a new trainer aircraft for fighter and bomber pilots, the sources said.

Over the years, the Defense Department’s mammoth effort to modernize its nuclear arsenal, which also includes the Navy’s nuclear submarines, has generally had bipartisan support on Capitol Hill despite its almost $500 billion price tag. Previous President Barack Obama also endorsed the effort.

But the Pentagon may face renewed resistance from lawmakers this year, particularly in the newly Democratic House. The Air Force’s nuclear cruise missile and the new land-based intercontinental ballistic missile are the most likely targets, as the projects have previously faced criticism from high-profile officials. Former Secretary of Defense William Perry, among other current and former officials, has decried the cruise missile as “extremely destabilizing.”

In the most concrete evidence that lawmakers will put up a more robust fight this year, the chairman of the powerful House Armed Services Committee recently took a shot at the land-based leg of the nuclear triad, saying the missiles are not “necessary for our deterrence.”

“The problem with them is that they’re identifiable targets and, also, I don’t think they’re necessary for our deterrence because of the submarines that we have and the bombers,” said Democratic Rep. Adam Smith during a recent hearing.

Aside from the spike in research and development funds, the biggest change to the Air Force’s budget roadmap is the decision to begin buying a new version of Boeing’s legacy F-15 fighter jet, dubbed the F-15X, the sources confirmed. The decision was not in the Air Force’s original plan when it started drawing up the fiscal year 2020 budget, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson acknowledged in early March. Rather, it was forced on the service by Pentagon leadership.

The Air Force plans to buy eight F-15Xs this year and a total of 80 over the next five years.

The addition of the F-15X to the Air Force’s fleet will not come at the expense of Lockheed Martin’s F-35, the source said. However, the Air Force is buying fewer F-35s than planned over the next five years, just 48 per year. In last year’s budget submission, the service had planned to buy 48 in fiscal year 2020, then ramp up to 54 per year starting in fiscal year 2021.

However, there is funding in the Air Force’s budget to accelerate an upgrade to the F-35, called Block 4, one source said.

In total, the Air Force plans to eventually buy about 1,500 F-35s.

If history is any indication, Congress will likely oppose the Air Force’s plan to cut the F-35 and ultimately add money in the budget to continue buying the plane at the same rate.

Like the White House’s overall budget submission for the Department of Defense, the Air Force’s plan includes a sizable portion of funds for the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account, a controversial war fund that has been criticized as a “slush fund.” The Air Force’s budget includes $42.4 billion for OCO.

To support this shift, the Air Force has moved whole programs into OCO, such as funding to buy the precision-guided weapons the joint direct attack munitions, the source said.

Including what is called “pass through” money for classified programs, which the Air Force does not control, the service would be getting $204.8 billion, the sources said.
 
Lara Seligman is a staff writer at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @laraseligman

Rep. Omar's Comments and the House Failure to Debate U.S.-Israeli Relations

Why does Israel "need" so much U.S. support?

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)

Mar-11-2019
http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpg(SAN FRANCISCO, Calif.) - Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) recently suggested that House supporters of Israel have dual allegiances. Her comments caused a furor. Whether her comments were anti-semitic is debatable. Ideally, this uproar was an excellent opportunity for a long overdue debate on our one-sided U.S foreign policy toward Israel. Instead, the House passed a resolution condemning anti-Semitism and other bigotry.

I fear this resolution will result in a chilling effect on legitimate speech activity. All criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic.

Through (and since) the George W. Bush administration, there has been a clear pro-Israel tilt to U.S.-Israeli foreign policy. Consider that since 1972, the U.S. has cast over 43 vetoes in the United Nations to protect Israel.

Israel is the largest annual recipient of direct economic and military assistance since 1976. According to President Trump’s fiscal year budget request, Israel is expected to receive $3.3 billion in annual funding in 2019.

Why does Israel need so much U.S. support, as Israel’s vulnerability is a myth? Although there is open hostility between Israel and many of the other Arab states, the latter do not pose a direct threat to Israel at this time.

Even though an Arab alliance has a quantitative advantage, Israel can rely on its technological and military dominance. Israel has a nuclear monopoly in the region, although there is fear that Iran will develop this capability.

It has a military superiority vis-a-vis any possible coalition of Arab forces. It has the fourth largest air force in the world after the U.S., Russian, and China. It is the only state in the region with its own defense industry. It has the most modern military in the region with about 160,000 personnel.

Unfortunately, under President Trump, the pro-Israel tilt has gotten worse. Trump has started a new, hardline pro-Israel stance that fits easily with the Republican Party and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

David Friedman, his ambassador to Israel, is a pro-Israel advocate who once wrote that the two-state solution is “a suicidal ‘peace’ with hateful radical Islamists hell bent on Israel’s destruction.”

Trump moved the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Trump appears to have abandoned efforts to curb illegal settlement activity in the West Bank, and the Trump administration’s peace plan, supposedly being drafted by son-in-law Jared Kushner, is reportedly tilted toward Israel’s view of the conflict. That’s why it is very, very unlikely for a resumption of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

While it is unrealistic for the U.S. to suddenly become neutral in all things Middle East, we must end our lockstep support of Israel with little or no public debate.

Instead, we must redefine what it means to be pro-Isr

More Syrian children killed in 2018 than any other year of civil war

UNICEF's executive director warns against the "alarming misconception" that the Syrian war is coming quickly to a close
A Syrian refugee crosses into Turkey with her children at the border on 2 March 2019 (Reuters)

By MEE and agencies- 11 March 2019 

More children were killed last year in Syria than any other year to date, the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) said in a statement on Monday.
At least 1,106 children were killed in 2018 as a result of fighting in Syria. While already record-breaking, UNICEF highlighted that the figures “are likely much higher,” as the numbers included in the UN report are only those that the organisation was able to verify.
“Mine contamination” accounted for 39 percent of documented deaths and injuries among children last year, the group found. There were also attacks on 262 education and health facilities – another record high.
“Today there exists an alarming misconception that the conflict in Syria is drawing quickly to a close – it is not,” UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore warned in the statement.
Newborn son of British Islamic State teenager Shamima Begum dies
Read More »
“Children in parts of the country remain in as much danger as at any other time during the eight-year conflict,” Fore continued.
Since January, nearly 60 children have reportedly died while making the nearly 200 mile trek from Baghouz, the last Islamic State (IS) stronghold in Syria, to al-Hol refugee camp in the northeast of the war-torn country, according to UNICEF.
Around 65,000 people, including an estimated 240 unaccompanied or separated children, currently live in the al-Hol camp, the UN reported.
“As the war enters its ninth year, UNICEF again reminds parties to the conflict and the global community that it is the country’s children who have suffered most and have the most to lose. Each day the conflict continues is another day stolen from their childhood,” Fore said.
UNICEF did not provide information regarding which forces were responsible for any of the documented deaths.
Fore called on “all parties to the conflict” to prioritise the protection of all children “no matter who controls which area and regardless of the alleged affiliations of a child’s family”.
The director also urged countries to provide “predictable, unrestricted, multi-year funding” to UNICEF in order for the group to meet the needs, both immediate and long-term, of children in Syria and across the region.
In December 2018, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights found that last year’s total death toll in Syrian had hit a record low, at 20,000 lives lost in the country.
Syria's war has killed an estimated half a million people and driven about 5.6 million people out of the country. Another 6.6 million people still in the country have lost or fled their homes.

Human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh jailed 'for 38 years' in Iran

Lawyer sentenced to decades in prison and 148 lashes, husband writes on Facebook
Sotoudeh was charged with spying, spreading propaganda and insulting Iran’s supreme leader. Photograph: Behrouz Mehri/AFP/Getty Images

Reuters in Geneva-
Nasrin Sotoudeh, an internationally renowned human rights lawyer jailed in Iran, has been handed a new sentence that her husband said was 38 years in prison and 148 lashes.

Sotoudeh, who has represented opposition activists including women prosecuted for removing their mandatory headscarf, was arrested in Juneand charged with spying, spreading propaganda and insulting Iran’s supreme leader, her lawyer said.

She was jailed in 2010 for spreading propaganda and conspiring to harm state security – charges she denied – and was released after serving half of her six-year term. The European parliament awarded her the Sakharov human rights prize.

Mohammad Moqiseh, a judge at a revolutionary court in Tehran, said on Monday that Sotoudeh had been sentenced to five years for assembling against national security and two years for insulting the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Sotoudeh’s husband, Reza Khandan, wrote on Facebook that the sentence was decades in jail and 148 lashes, unusually harsh even for Iran, which cracks down hard on dissent and regularly imposes death sentences for some crimes.

The news comes days after Iran appointed a hardline new head of the judiciary, Ebrahim Raisi, who is a protege of Ali Khamenei. The appointment is seen as weakening the political influence of the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, a relative moderate.

Iran, often accused of human rights abuses, said it had allowed the UN deputy high commissioner for human rights, Kate Gilmore, to visit last week at the head of a “technical mission”.

The visit, confirmed by a UN official, appeared to be the first in many years by UN human rights investigators, who have been denied access by the government.

The UN investigator on human rights in Iran, Javaid Rehman, raised Sotoudeh’s case at the UN human rights council in Geneva on Monday, saying that last week that she “was reportedly convicted of charges relating to her work and could face a lengthy prison sentence”.

He added: “Worrying patterns of intimidation, arrest, prosecution and ill-treatment of human rights defenders, lawyers and labour rights activists signal an increasingly severe state response.”

U.N. envoy fears 'new crisis' for Rohingya if moved to Bangladesh island

Yanghee Lee talk to reporters during Reuters interview in Bangkok
Yanghee Lee talk to reporters during Reuters interview in Bangkok, Thailand January 18, 2019. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun

Stephanie Nebehay-MARCH 11, 2019

GENEVA (Reuters) - A United Nations human rights investigator on Myanmar voiced deep concern on Monday over Bangladesh’s plan to relocate 23,000 Rohingya refugees in April to a remote island, saying it may not be habitable and could create a potential “new crisis”.

Bangladesh says moving refugees to Bhasan Char - whose name means “floating island” - will ease chronic overcrowding in its camps at Cox’s Bazar, which hold some 730,000 Rohingya. The U.N. says the Muslim minority fled mass killings and rapes committed during an army crackdown in Rakhine state since August 2017.

Some humanitarian groups have criticised the relocation plan, saying the island in the Bay of Bengal is vulnerable to frequent cyclones.

“There are a number of things that remain unknown to me even following my visit, chief among them being whether the island is truly habitable,” said Yanghee Lee, U.N. special rapporteur on Myanmar, who visited the island in January.

“Ill-planned relocation, and relocations without the consent of the refugees concerned, have the potential to create a new crisis,” she told the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Shah Kamal, secretary of Bangladesh’s Disaster Management Ministry, said the government was in talks with U.N. agencies on the issue.

“(The agencies) have agreed. Now we’re finalising with them how to move them (the refugees) and all other factors. Everything is ready... Housing, power, healthcare, communication, storm surge embankment, cyclone shelter centres and all other facilities,” he told Reuters in Dhaka.
 
“There is absolutely no reason to be concerned about floods because we have built an embankment. And no one will be moved there against their will.”

“SYSTEMATIC GENOCIDE”

Lee, who is banned by Myanmar’s government from visiting, told the Geneva forum that up to 10,000 civilians were reported to have fled their homes in Myanmar’s Rakhine state since November due to violence and a lack of humanitarian aid.

“For decades we faced a systematic genocide in Myanmar. They took our citizenship, our land, they destroyed our mosques,” Mohib Bullah, a Rohingya refugee from the camps who is documenting name-by-name those killed in Myanmar, told the Council.

“Over 120,000 Rohingya still live in concentration camps in Myanmar, others outside live in fear of violence,” he said. “We want to go home to Myanmar, with our rights, our citizenship, and international security on the ground.”

A U.N. fact-finding mission last year said Mynamar’s 2017 military campaign that pushed out the Rohingya was orchestrated with “genocidal intent”. Myanmar denies allegations of mass killings and rape and says its offensive was a legitimate response to an insurgent threat.

Lee urged the U.N. Security Council to refer alleged atrocities in Myanmar to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and encouraged Yangon to accept its jurisdiction.
 
But Myanmar’s ambassador, Kyaw Moe Tun said the Hague-based court had “no jurisdiction over Myanmar whatsoever”.

“Myanmar is fully committed to ensuring accountability where there is credible evidence of human rights violations committed in Rakhine State,” he said.

The most pressing task is to focus on a speedy start to repatriating the refugees, he said, without using the word ‘Rohingya’ - who are mostly stateless in Myanmar.

Additional reporting by Ruma Paul in Dhaka, Bangladesh; Editing by Gareth Jones