Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Pak Army Looking After Me Very Well – Captured Indian Pilot

Wing Comd Abhi Nandan
A video on social media, supposedly showing the captured Indian fighter pilot, is going viral. In the video, the Indian pilot is seen describing his good experience in the custody of Pakistani authorities, who are interrogating him. He is also seen urging Indian forces to reciprocate this when dealing with Pakistani troops. The pilot is heard saying, "I wish to put this on record and I will not change my statement if I go to my country that officers of the Pakistani army have looked after me very well and they are thorough gentlemen…I am very impressed by the Pakistani Army."

According to the Pakistan official, the Pilot lands in Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

"There is only one pilot under Pakistan Army’s custody. Wing Comd Abhi Nandan is being treated as per norms of military ethics," Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor, Spokesperson Pakistan Armed Force said.

Pakistan captures Indian pilot after shooting down aircraft, escalating hostilities

Pakistan said Feb. 27 that it shot down two Indian warplanes in its airspace and captured at least one pilot. India confirmed one of its planes was shot down. 

 In the most ominous military confrontation between India and Pakistan since both tested nuclear weapons two decades ago, Pakistan said it shot down two Indian military aircraft over its territory Wednesday and launched strikes in Indian-controlled Kashmir, while India claimed it shot down a Pakistani fighter jet in the “aerial encounter.” 

An especially volatile aspect of the confrontation was Pakistan’s capture of an Indian fighter pilot. Pakistani military officials posted a photo of him on Twitter sitting in a room, and they said he was being treated “per norms of military ethics.” 

But Pakistani television showed a video of the pilot, blindfolded and apparently with blood on his face. India’s Foreign Ministry said it “strongly objected to Pakistan’s vulgar display of an injured personnel” and expected “his immediate and safe return.”

While experts warned that the clash could easily escalate out of control, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan told his nation Wednesday that he wanted to avoid war with India, saying, “Let’s settle this with talks.” There was no public statement, however, by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 

“Our action was only intended to convey that if you can come into our country, we can do the same,” Khan said, referring to airstrikes by India on Tuesday and Pakistan’s response on Wednesday. Addressing India, he said, “With the weapons you have and the weapons we have, can we really afford a miscalculation?”

The two days of tit-for-tat airstrikes and Wednesday’s aerial dogfight, the first since 1971, were triggered by a Feb. 14 terrorist bombing in Indian-controlled Kashmir that killed 40 Indian security personnel. The bombing, claimed by a Pakistan-based militant group called Jaish-e-Muhammad, was the deadliest single attack in 30 years of protests and conflict over the disputed Himalayan region, which is claimed in its entirety by both nations.


Villagers gather to look at the wreckage of a military aircraft after it crashed on the outskirts of Srinagar, in Indian-controlled Kashmir. (Mukhtar Khan/AP)

Indian and Pakistani officials gave conflicting accounts of the events. India claimed it had bombed a militant camp inside Pakistan on Tuesday, killing scores, but Pakistan said the bombs had fallen on an uninhabited forested area. Pakistan also denied India’s claims that a Pakistani F-16 fighter jet was shot down.

The clash drew expressions of alarm from foreign governments and regional analysts, who noted that India and Pakistan have previously fought three conventional wars, two of them over Kashmir. They also engaged in a brief high-altitude fight in the Kargil mountains of Kashmir in 1999, shortly after both countries tested nuclear weapons.

Moeed Yusuf, a Pakistan expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington, said he feared the conflict could escalate dangerously, in large part because neither Khan, who has been in office only a few months, nor Modi, who is seeking reelection this spring, may be able to back down without losing domestic political stature.

Pakistan’s retaliatory strike punctured a triumphal moment for Modi. After India conducted its operation Tuesday against what it said was a terrorist training camp in Pakistan, members of Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party celebrated. Amit Shah, the party’s president, wrote on Twitter that the strike was a testament to Modi’s “strong and decisive leadership.”

By Wednesday, the mood in India had shifted to focus on the fate of its captured pilot, whom Indian media outlets identified as Wing Cmdr. Abhinandan Varthaman. Indian officials said his video while blindfolded violated the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of war prisoners.

In Pakistan, despite official claims about wanting to avoid escalation, a mood of belligerent triumph spread across news stations and online Wednesday. War songs were played, commentators praised the military, and shouts of “God is greatest” could be heard. Images of a burning Indian fighter jet were broadcast repeatedly.

Some Pakistani commentators, however, expressed concern that the situation could rapidly spiral out of control. Imad Zafar, a columnist writing in the online Pakistan Express Tribune, said the Indian attack was a “trap” set by Modi that Pakistan should avoid. “A war between two nuclear-armed states can only bring destruction on both sides,” he wrote, calling for dialogue. “. . . We don’t want war, India. Neither should you.”

Some experts said the tit-for-tat strikes of the past two days might help de-escalate tensions. India has “talked up the strike on the terror camp,” while Pakistan has “captured an Indian pilot and shot down an Indian fighter jet,” said Ajai Shukla, a defense analyst and former army officer in Delhi. “Both sides have something they can hold on to.”

But other observers, including Yusuf, said intervention by foreign powers, including the United States, might be the only way to restore calm. “What started as mere posturing is now a real near-war crisis that can easily spill into real combat,” Yusuf said.
India launches airstrike on Pakistan-based militants
India’s foreign secretary, Vijay Gokhale, said the Feb. 26 airstrike targeted Pakistan-based militants behind a suicide bombing that killed 46 Indian soldiers. 
In previous moments of high tension between India and Pakistan, such as the Kargil conflict, the United States played a key role in defusing the situation.

Acting defense secretary Patrick Shanahan, one of the few national security officials remaining in Washington as President Trump and others are in Hanoi for the summit meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jung Un, has been “focused on de-escalating tensions and urging both of the nations to avoid further military action,” according to a Pentagon statement Wednesday.

The State Department called on India and Pakistan “to cease all cross-border military activity and for a return to stability” in a statement Wednesday. The department also urged Pakistan “to deny terrorists safe haven and block their access to funds.”

Pakistani officials said they have appealed to the United States to become more involved in the crisis, perhaps sending a high-level official to shuttle between the two capitals, and they bemoaned the fact that Washington appears distracted with multiple other crises.

In a statement issued Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called on both countries to “exercise restraint, and avoid escalation at any cost.” Asad Majeed Khan, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, told reporters in a meeting Wednesday that the Trump administration’s failure to condemn India’s initial airstrike in Pakistan had “emboldened them even more.”

Other countries expressed concern and called on both sides to reduce hostilities.

British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said that he was “very concerned” about the rising tensions and that he had spoken with his Indian and Pakistani counterparts about it. “Neither side wants to see this escalate further, but this is going to take really critical restraint in the days ahead,” he said. Russia’s Foreign Ministry “expressed hope for the de-escalation of the situation.”

Khan said his government had offered to help investigate the Feb. 14 bombing. Pakistan has denied any links with the attackers, but it has long publicly supported those it calls Kashmiri “freedom fighters” and condemned Indian brutality against protesters. The Indian and Pakistani portions of Kashmir are divided by a militarized “Line of Control.”

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry said its retaliatory airstrikes were aimed at “nonmilitary targets” to avoid human loss and damage. It said Pakistan has “no intention of escalation, but we are fully prepared to do so if forced.”

India confirmed that one MiG-21 fighter jet was shot down in an “aerial engagement” with Pakistani forces on Wednesday morning. 

Pakistani officials also claimed Wednesday afternoon that India had committed “unprovoked cease-fire violations” along the Line of Control on Tuesday, resulting in the deaths of four civilians, three of them women. A Foreign Ministry statement named the four individuals but did not say where or how they died. It called the alleged targeting of civilian areas “deplorable” and said such cease-fire violations could lead to a “strategic miscalculation.”


Indian security personnel carry the remains of their comrades at the site of an explosion that killed at least 40 troops in Pampore on Feb. 14. (Dar Yasin/AP)


Indian soldiers arrive near the wreckage of an Indian aircraft that crashed on the outskirts of Srinagar. (Mukhtar Khan/AP)

As tensions mounted Wednesday, commercial flights were suspended across Pakistan and a swath of northwestern India. For most of the day, flight-tracking websites showed no commercial flights in the air in Pakistan and none in five regions across the border, including Indian-controlled Kashmir. India’s Civil Aviation Authority later lifted restrictions on flights.

In Indian-controlled Kashmir, residents braced for the worst. Vikas Bhasin, 61, a shopkeeper in the Poonch region near the Line of Control, said that around 10 a.m., he saw fighter jets that he believed were Pakistani aircraft streaking through the sky. After they passed overhead, Bhasin said, police drove through the area and announced on loudspeakers that there was no need to panic.

In Srinagar, the largest city in Indian-administered Kashmir, residents have been on edge ever since the Feb. 14 attack. Over the weekend, there were reports of residents hoarding fuel and groceries. The closure of the Srinagar airport for much of Wednesday was “serious and unsettling,” said Manzoor Ahmad Bhat, 50. “Things seem to be collapsing.”

Constable reported from Kabul. Shaiq Hussain in Islamabad, Pakistan; Ishfaq Naseem in Srinagar, India; Niha Masih in Delhi; and Karen DeYoung in Washington contributed to this report.

Indian aircraft downed as tensions rise with Pakistan

-27 Feb 2019Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Air strikes across a disputed border, fighter jets downed, a pilot captured, airspace closed – and this between two major nuclear powers.
Leaders around the world are urging India and Pakistan to show restraint as tension over Kashmir escalate still further.
The skirmishes took place across the Kashmiri line of control, a territory which both countries claim in full, but control only in part, and a territory they’ve fought at least two wars over in the past.

What If There Is A Nuclear War Between Pakistan And India?


In 2018, atmospheric scientist Brian Toon gave a Ted Talk on nuclear war. During the talk, he spoke on the repercussions of a nuclear war between Pakistan and India.

Below is a transcript of his talk on nuclear war between Pakistan and India.
Even a war between India and Pakistan two of the smallest nuclear powers with only a few hundred weapons about the size of the Hiroshima bomb, we might die as unintended consequences that the Indian and Pakistani generals never even gave us a thought about. 
My colleagues Luke Oman and Alan Roubach calculated the spread of smoke [see the map] after a war between India and Pakistan. It only takes about two weeks for the smoke to cover the entire earth and it would rise to altitudes between 20 to 50 miles above the surface. At those altitudes it never rains, the smoke would stay there for years. 
This farmer [picture] maybe in Europe or the United States but many thousand miles from Pakistan and India is looking at the smoky sky above him and down at the crops that have died in his field from lack of light and cold temperatures.

It is estimated that in a war between India and Pakistan that we would lose 10 to 40 per cent of the yields of corn, wheat and rice for years afterward because of the bad weather. The entire world only has enough food to feed the population for 60 days unless agriculture produces more food. Ira Helfand a member of the Noble Peace Prize winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War has estimated that one to two billion people would die after a war between India and Pakistan of starvation.
Watch Here: I've studied nuclear war for 35 years -- you should be worried

Algeria: What's fuelling the country's mass protest movement?

President Bouteflika's decision to run for fifth term is only one cause of widespread public anger
Tens of thousands of Algerian students joined protest movement this week (Reuters)

By Brahim Oumansour-27 February 2019 

Abdelaziz Bouteflika’s decision to run for a fifth presidential term - despite his poor health and advanced age - is a non-starter for many Algerians.
Hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets in cities across the country as well as abroad over the past several days to peacefully oppose the candidacy of Bouteflika, 81, shattering a wall of silence and fear.
The current Algerian government did not anticipate this unprecedented level of mobilisation. It also shouldn't expect it to end quickly.
The protests also surprised the international community and observers of Algerian politics, as the country had largely avoided the mass rallies held across the Middle East and North Africa during the so-called Arab Spring in 2011.
Here's a look at some of the factors that led to the protests in Algeria, and what impact they may have on the country's upcoming elections.

An all-powerful regime

Bouteflika's announcement that he would seek a fifth term as president sparked anger among Algerian citizens and kicked off a grassroots movement in several cities after anonymous calls appeared on social media for people to protest.
The protests occurred spontaneously and outside the country's traditional political power structures, despite the fact that some collectives including Mouwatana - a citizen-led movement that includes political parties, associations and individuals - also urged Algerians to take to the streets.
Algeria hasn't seen this sort of mass protest movement since a popular uprising in 1988, when youths protested in droves over high unemployment, rising living costs and harsh austerity measures.
In fact, the Algerian population has long been divorced from politics.
Bouteflika has the potential to be re-elected, including support from the current administration as well as the army, which prioritises stability over possibly risky political change.
The president also has been able to solidify his position through a political and economic coalition that includes the Front de Liberation National (FLN) and the Rassemblement National Democratique (RND), as well as key businesspeople who have emerged during his time in office.
Bouteflika has also benefited from the achievements of his 20-year presidency, including a return to peace, investments, the modernisation and construction of infrastructure, building of housing and universities and access to gas and electricity across the country.

Social despair

Still, it is also important to note that opposition political parties have crumbled on all fronts, and Algeria's political and media landscape makes it almost impossible for new personalities or political groups to emerge and transform the system.
Against that backdrop, there are no political candidates powerful or credible enough to mount a serious challenge to Bouteflika.
Nevertheless, the current protest movement may devastate the status quo.
Social despair has worsened under a series of austerity measures applied after a drop in oil prices in 2014, accompanied by inflation of basic-goods prices that hit middle- and lower-class people the hardest
The protests are producing a new dynamic and Algerians are emerging as actors in the political system, something the authorities must now take into account.
We can perhaps ask why this type of movement didn't happen earlier, during the 2011 revolts in the Arab world or in the last Algerian presidential elections in 2014.
Several factors - some more visible than others - have contributed, including most notably the current poor economic and social situation in Algeria.
The state has invested massive sums to modernise the country's infrastructure and encourage economic recovery, but it hasn't succeeded in developing an economy that improves citizens' purchasing power and provides work for a large number of young, unemployed job seekers.
Corruption and clientelism have created a feeling of injustice among those who haven't benefited from the country's riches.
Social despair has worsened under a series of austerity measures applied after a drop in oil prices in 2014, accompanied by inflation of basic-goods prices that hit middle- and lower-class people the hardest.

Political maturity

The longevity of Bouteflika's presidency - which risks stretching beyond two decades, should he secure a fifth term - has propelled the anger of Algerians and generated a feeling of weariness, if not humiliation, as a result of the president's poor health.
To run for a fifth term is one time too many in the eyes of a large segment of Algerians.
Tens of thousands of Algerian students join growing anti-Bouteflika protests
Read More »
The president's absence in the media since he suffered a stroke in 2013, and his visibly fragile state, as shown in pictures that have emerged since then, make his candidacy difficult to defend for members of his entourage this time around.
Moreover, the economic and social progress achieved over the last 20 years has created an Algerian middle class that is politically mature.
That segment of the country's society aspires to, and in fact, has made political and social demands that are more ambitious than what's being offered by the government.
Finally, the role of new technologies cannot be ignored. The internet and social media in particular is now available across Algeria, contributing to the spread of the protests and helping to broadcast and coordinate actions in different cities.
In response to all of this, Algerian authorities must seek to advance a dialogue and avoid using defiant discourse - which could worsen the situation - towards the protesters.
They should also put forward concrete measures to help Algeria usher in a real political transition based on a national consensus. Bouteflika himself spoke about just that when he announced that he planned to run for a fifth term.
How the government responds is especially critical, because the protests may prove long-lasting and widespread, as evidenced by the tens of thousands of university students who joined the movement earlier this week.
This article was translated from Middle East Eye's French website by Jillian Kestler-D'Amours.

Australian regulators are piling the pressure on Google and Facebook




26 Feb 2019
THE economic influence of giants such as Google and Facebook on the global market is undeniable.
So much so that last year, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) started five investigations to probe into the effect of the two aforementioned digital platform providers on the market.
The preliminary report from the inquiry that was released soon after, concluded that both internet firms have “substantial market power” in numerous areas, and that there is a “lack of transparency in the operation of Google and Facebook’s key algorithms.”
Citing examples of results page from Google searches as well as Facebook’s user feed, and given the prevalence of these two platforms in Australia, ACCC expressed concerns that the lack of transparency hurts news publishers in the country and their monetisation plans.

Call for increased scrutiny

One of the recommendations made by the competition watchdog was to set up a regulatory body to oversee all integrated digital service providers that meet a certain revenue threshold to keep them from engaging in discriminatory practices.
These practices may include, “favoring their own business interests above those of advertisers or potentially competing businesses.”
This new body would also keep a close watch on how online ads are ranked and displayed, as well as the order of news and editorial content on the platforms.
The report added, “The relevant digital platforms would need to be obliged to provide information and documents to the regulatory authority on a regular basis, and the regulatory authority would need appropriate investigative powers.”
063_684238654
Google CEO Sundar Pichai delivers the keynote address at the Google I/O 2017 Conference at Shoreline Amphitheater on May 17, 2017 in Mountain View, California. Source: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/AFP
Admitting that there has to be a need to restrict businesses from “gaming” the platforms’ algorithm, ACCC said the new body would only provide oversight instead of forcing full disclosures of algorithms.
“The ACCC considers that such a regulatory approach would provide assurances to both businesses and consumers that algorithms are not being used to favor certain businesses or, in the case of news stories, are operating in such a way as to cause significant detriment to the production of news and journalistic content or media markets,” the report read.

Google and Facebook push back

Meanwhile, Google Australia’s Managing Director Mel Silva is understandably concerned by the report had called the proposed oversight body an “algorithm regulator,” and said establishing such body will “risk poor outcomes.”
In a blog post, Silva wrote:
“We already provide extensive guidance on search ranking, including our 164 page Search quality rater guidelines, and the How Search Works guide.
“And of course, Google Search results are open for all to see. We believe this approach balances the need for transparency against the risk of manipulation by bad actors and do not believe that an algorithm regulator would lead to higher quality search results or promote journalism.”
000_1CT5IP
one hundred cardboard cutouts of Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg stand outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, April 10, 2018. Source: Saul Loeb / AFP
According to Silva, Google, as massive it is, does have a lot of competition, whereby it still battles for searches from users against other search engines and specialised service searches on e-commerce platforms and travel websites.
Facebook VP of APAC Policy Simon Milner too rejected the proposed regulation, and said that the development of technology has transformed how everything is consumed, including news and Facebook’s algorithm has little to do with media decline in Australia.
“Technology has impacted consumer behavior in very dramatic ways, but turning the clock back won’t be good either for news consumers or for the thriving online services industry that Australia has built. Instead, it is important to look at responsible and effective ways to fund journalism,” said Milner.
Regulating tech companies seems to be something of a double-edged sword, whereby well-intentioned policy that meant protect consumers and businesses may also end up stifling innovative solutions.
And thus, the key is to maintain a balanced approach of common sense regulations, without encroaching too much into technological innovation that is meant to help businesses in the first place.
This article originally appeared on our sister site Tech Wire Asia

Thousands of migrant children allegedly sexually abused in US custody

Allegations ranged from adult staff members having relationships with minors to forcible touching, HHS documents show
Children and workers at a tent encampment near the Tornillo port of entry in Tornillo, Texas, on 19 June 2018. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Hazar Kilani -
Almost 5,000 complaints of sexual abuse and harassment of migrant children in US custody have been filed over the past four years, according to government documents released this week. The allegations range from adult staff members having relationships with minors, and the showing of pornographic videos, to forcible touching.

According to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) documentsreleased on Tuesday on Capitol Hill by the Florida Democratic representative Ted Deutch’s office, the reports date back to October 2015, during the Obama administration. However, most of the sexual abuse and harassment reported occurred since Donald Trump took office.

During a House judiciary committee hearing on Tuesday, Deutch addressed the documents and linked them to the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” policy on immigration, regarding unlawful incursions of the US-Mexico border. The policy, widely regarded as a strong-arm attempt by the government to discourage immigration, resulted in almost 3,000 migrant children being forcibly separated from their families.

“These documents tell us that there is a problem with adults, employees of HHS, sexually abusing children,” Deutch said at the hearing.

The total number of sexual abuse complaints in 2018 was 1,261, an increase of 192 compared with 2017. While the majority of the sexual assaults were allegedly committed by other minors in custody, 178 out of the thousands of complaints filed were accusations against staff. The number of reported sexual abuse incidents involving staff against migrant children increased in 2018, with a total of 12 complaints filed in July compared with four in February.

“This works out, on average, to one sexual assault by HHS staff on an unaccompanied minor per week,” Deutch said. The point was angrily disputed by Jonathan White, a testifying official who has overseen child migrant detention matters at HHS.

He questioned whether the staff members involved in the allegations were members of HHS staff or affiliated to outside contractors.

“Those are not HHS staff in any of those allegations,” White said.

White also stated that when a sexual assault is reported, it is fully investigated. Reports deemed legitimate are then sent to the Department of Justice for prosecution, he said.

The Department of Justicereceived 29% out of the total of 4,556 reports initially filed, according to the data released by Deutch’s office.

HHS manages the care of tens of thousands of migrant children, most of whom had crossed the border alone. However, in August 2017, 3.6% of the children had been separated from a parent or a guardian. After they are detained at the US border by Customs and Border Protection (CBP), they are placed in privately run shelters contracted by the government.

Officials say most of the allegations haven’t been substantiated and are defending the care they provide to immigrant children.

However, reports of sexual assault against minors are not the only tragedies coming out of the US detention facilities. Two Guatemalan children have recently died under US custody, shining light on the treatment of immigrants detained by authorities.

World's smallest baby boy goes home from Japan hospital


A baby boy weighing 268 grams when born in August 2018, the hospital claims is the smallest baby to survive and be sent home healthy, is seen five days after his birth in Tokyo, Japan, in this undated handout photo released by Keio University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and obtained Reuters on February 27, 2019. Mandatory credit Keio University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics/Handout via Reuter.

FEBRUARY 27, 2019

TOKYO (Reuters) - A baby boy weighing just 268 grams (9.45 oz) at birth was sent home after months in a Tokyo hospital, the smallest surviving male baby in the world, Keio University hospital said.

The boy was born through Caesarean-section last August after he failed to gain weight during the pregnancy and doctors feared his life was in danger.
 
The boy was in intensive care until his weight reached 3.2 kilograms and he was discharged on Feb. 20, said Dr. Takeshi Arimitsu of the university’s School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics.

“I am grateful that he has grown this big because, honestly, I wasn’t sure he could survive,” the boy’s mother told Reuters.
 
The previous record was held by a boy born in Germany in 2009 weighing 274 grams, according to the Tiniest Babies registry managed by the University of Iowa.

The smallest girl was born weighing 252 grams in Germany in 2015, according to the registry.

Reporting by Mayuko Ono; Writing by Stanley White; Editing by Darren Schuettler

Radical Parkinson's treatment tested in patients


A man with a port in his head
The drug is delivered via a "port" in the side of the head

27 February 2019
A radical Parkinson's treatment that delivers a drug directly to the brain has been tested in people.
Patients in the trial were either given the drug, which is administered via a "port" in the side of the head, or a dummy treatment (placebo).
Both groups showed improved symptoms, meaning it was not clear if the drug was responsible for the benefits.
However, scans did find visual evidence of improvements to affected areas of the brain in those given the drug.
The study's authors say it hints at the possibility of "reawakening" brain cells damaged by the condition.
Other experts, though, say it is too early to know whether this finding might result in improvements in Parkinson's symptoms.
Researchers believe the port implant could also be used to administer chemotherapy to those with brain tumours or to test new drugs for Alzheimer's and stroke patients.
Parkinson's causes parts of the brain to become progressively damaged, resulting in a range of symptoms, such as involuntary shaking and stiff, inflexible muscles.
About 145,000 people a year in the UK are diagnosed with the degenerative condition, which cannot be slowed down or reversed.
For this new study, scientists gave patients an experimental treatment called glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), in the hope it could regenerate dying brain cells and even reverse the condition.
Participants underwent robot-assisted surgery to have four tubes placed into their brains, which allowed GDNF to be infused directly to the affected areas with pinpoint accuracy, via a port in their head.
After an initial safety study of six people, 35 patients took part in a nine-month "blinded" trial, where half were randomly assigned to receive monthly infusions of GDNF and the other half dummy infusions.
Dr Alan Whone, principal investigator, said patients in the trial had, on average, been diagnosed eight years previously, but brain scans of those given the drug showed images that would be expected just two years after diagnosis.
He said: "We've shown with the Pet [positron emission tomography] scans that, having arrived, the drug then engages with its target, dopamine nerve endings, and appears to help damaged cells regenerate or have a biological response."

'I feel it brought me time'

Tom PhippsImage copyright
Tom Phipps, 63, from Bristol, said he had noticed an improvement during the trial and had been able to reduce the drugs he takes for his condition.
Since it ended, he has slowly increased his medication but is continuing to ride his bike, dig his allotment and chair his local branch of Parkinson's UK.
"My outcome was as positive as I could have wished for," he said.
"I feel the trial brought me some time and has delayed the progress of my condition.
"The best part was absolutely being part of a group of people who've got a similar goal - not only the team of consultants and nurses but also the participants.
"You can't have expectations - you can only have hope."

Following the initial nine months on GDNF or placebo, all participants had the opportunity to receive GDNF for a further nine months.
By 18 months, when all participants had received GDNF, both groups showed moderate to large improvements in symptoms compared with their scores before they started the study.
But the authors say the results need to be treated with caution because of the possibility of the placebo effect - when a patient feels better despite taking a medicine with no active ingredient.
Researchers hope that further trials could look at increasing the doses of GDNF or the duration of treatment.

'A new horizon'

Prof K Ray Chaudhuri, from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, who was not involved in the study, said it was "disappointing" that the difference in symptoms was not significant.
But he said the study was still of "great interest and should point towards a new horizon and direction to restoration-based treatments".
The findings from the trials are published in the medical journals Brain and the Journal of Parkinson's Disease.
The study also features in a two-part BBC Two documentary series, The Parkinson's Drug Trial: A Miracle Cure? on 28 February and 7 March, at 21:00.