Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, January 18, 2019

Our Great Delution


Human Beings are Destroying Life on Earth but Deluding Ourselves that We are Not

by Robert J. Burrowes-
It is easy to identify the ongoing and endless violence being inflicted on life on Earth. This ranges from the vast multiplicity of assaults inflicted on our children and the biosphere to the endless wars and other military violence as well as the grotesque exploitation of many peoples living in Africa, Asia and Central/South America. But for a (very incomplete) list of 40 points see ‘Reflections on 2018, Forecasting 2019’.
However, despite the obvious fact that it is human beings who are inflicting all of this violence, it is virtually impossible to get people to pay attention to this simple and incontrovertible fact and to ask why, precisely, are human beings behaving in such violent and destructive ways? And can we effectively address this cause?
Of course, one part of this problem is the existence of many competing ideas about what causes violence. For example, some ideologies attribute the cause to a particular structural manifestation of violence, such as patriarchy (which generates a gendered system of violence and exploitation) or capitalism (which generates a class system of violence and exploitation). However, none of these ideologies explains why humans participate in structures of violence and exploitation in the first place. Surely a person who was not violent and exploitative to begin with would reject such violent and exploitative structures out of hand and work to create nonviolent and egalitarian structures instead.
But most people really just accept the elite-promulgated delusion that humans are innately dysfunctional and violent and this must be contained and controlled by socialization processes, laws, legal systems, police forces and prisons or, in the international arena, by such measures as economic sanctions and military violence. It is a rare individual who perceives the blatant dysfunctionality and violence of socialization, laws, legal systems, police forces, prisons, economic sanctions and military violence, and how these institutions and their violence serve elite interests.
Hence, humans are trapped in a cycle of attempting to address the vast range of manifestations of violent human behaviour – the wars, the climate catastrophe, destruction of the environment, the economic exploitation of vast sectors of the human population (women, indigenous peoples, working peoples…), the military dictatorships and occupations – without knowing what, fundamentally, causes dysfunctional and violent human behaviours and draws many people to participate in (and benefit from) violence in whatever form it takes.
Well I, for one, find it boring to see the same manifestations of violence repeated endlessly because we do not understand or address the fundamental cause (and so even well-meaning efforts to address it in a variety of contexts are doomed to fail). How about you?
Moreover, I find it boring to listen to (or read about) people endlessly deluding themselves about the violence; that is, deluding themselves that it isn’t happening, ‘it was always like that’, ‘it isn’t as bad as it seems’, ‘nothing can be done’, ‘there is another explanation’, that I am ‘doing enough already’, and so on.
To illustrate the above let me write some more frequent examples of people deluding themselves about the cause. You may have heard delusions like these expressed yourself; you may know some of the many others.
1. ‘The child deserved the punishment.’
2. ‘She asked for it.’
3. Violence is innate: it is ‘in our nature’.
4. ‘War is inevitable.’
5. The people in Africa/Asia/Central/South America ‘have always been poor’.
6. ‘The weather hasn’t changed; it was like that when I was a child.’
7. ‘We can’t control Mother Nature.’
8. ‘Nature is abundant.’
Of course, the most common delusional state is the one in which most people are trapped: they are just not paying significant attention to critical issues and have no knowledge (and informed opinion) about them but allow themselves to be distracted from reality by the various elite channels used for doing so, such as the corporate media.
So why do most people delude themselves rather than carefully observe reality, seek out and analyze the evidence in relation to it, and then behave appropriately and powerfully in response?
Because they are (unconsciously) terrified.
‘Is that all?’ you might say. ‘Surely the explanation for dysfunctional (and violent) human behaviour is more complex than that! Besides, when people I observe doing the sorts of dysfunctional and violent behaviours you mention above, they don’t look frightened, let alone terrified.’
So let me explain why the explanation above – that most human beings live in delusion, behave dysfunctionally and violently, fail to observe and analyze reality and then behave powerfully in response to it, because they are terrified – is the complete explanation and why people who are utterly terrified don’t ‘look frightened’.
At the moment of birth, the human individual has a genetically-embedded potential to seek out and powerfully pursue their own unique destiny by progressively developing a complex set of capacities to observe and listen, to think and feel, to analyze and evaluate, to plan and strategize, and to behave with awareness and power in response to their own astute insight into reality and the guidance provided by their conscience.
However, rather than nurture this potential so that the child grows up deeply in touch with their conscience, sensing capacities, thoughts, feelings and other faculties necessary to seek out and powerfully travel their own unique path, the significant adults in the child’s life immediately start to ‘socialize’ (that is, terrorize) the child into conforming with culturally and socially-acceptable norms of thought and behaviour on the basis that one human is more-or-less identical with another (give or take some minor variations among races, languages….).
The idea that each human mind might be unique in the way that each body is unique (while conforming to a general pattern in relation to shape, height and other physical characteristics) never even occurs to anyone. The idea that their child could have the potential to be as creative, powerful and unique as Leonardo Da Vinci, Mary Wollstonecraft, Sojourner Truth, Albert Einstein, Mohandas K. Gandhi or Rosalind Franklin never enters the mind of the typical parent.
Instead, we parent and teach children to conform to an endless sequence of beliefs and behavioural norms on the basis that ‘one size fits all’ because we are literally (but unconsciously) terrified that our child might be ‘different’ or, horror of horrors, unique! And we reward most highly those individuals who do conform and can demonstrate their conformity by passing, often literally, the endless series of socially-approved tests, formal and otherwise, that we set. See, for example, ‘Do We Want School or Education?’
The last thing we want is an individual who fearlessly thinks, feels and behaves as they personally decide is best for themself, perhaps even because their conscience dictates. But when they do act out of their own volition, we punish them to ensure that behaviour that is generated by their unique ‘Self’ is, if possible, terrorized out of them.
Of course, there are ‘good reasons’ for doing this. If we want obedient students, soldiers, employees and citizens, it is the perfect formula. Terrorize the child when they are young and obedience to a set of parentally/socially-approved beliefs and behaviours is virtually guaranteed.
Equally importantly, by starting this onslaught against the child from the moment of birth, they will grow up utterly unaware of the fact that they were terrorized out of becoming their ‘True Self’ and seeking their own unique destiny so that they could be the slave of their society, performing some function, menial or even ‘professional’, after they have submitted to sufficient training. The slave who never questions their role is truly a slave. And that is what we want!
Equally importantly, the person who has fearfully surrendered their Self at the alter of physical survival cannot observe or listen to the fear expressed by anyone else, including their own children. So they simply ‘fail to notice’ it.
So what, exactly, do we do so that each human being’s individual Self is crushed and they are rendered too terrified, self-hating and powerless to pursue their own life path, to honestly observe and listen to their own children and to mindfully consider the state of our world and act powerfully in response?
We inflict enormous, ongoing violence on the child, starting immediately after their birth.
‘How?’ you might ask. ‘I don’t scream at or hit my child. And I never punish them.’
Well, if that is true, it is a good start.
But, unfortunately, it is far more complex than these obvious types of violence and, strange though it may seem, it is not just the ‘visible’ violence (such as hitting, screaming at and sexually abusing) that we normally label ‘violence’ that causes the main damage, although this is extremely damaging. The largest component of damage arises from the ‘invisible’ and ‘utterly invisible’ violence that we adults unconsciously inflict on children during the ordinary course of the day. Tragically, the bulk of this violence occurs in the family home and at school. See ‘Why Violence?’and Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice.
So what is ‘invisible’ violence? It is the ‘little things’ we do every day, partly because we are just ‘too busy’. For example, when we do not allow time to listen to, and value, a child’s thoughts and feelings, the child learns to not listen to themSelf thus destroying their internal communication system. When we do not let a child say what they want (or ignore them when they do), the child develops communication and behavioral dysfunctionalities as they keep trying to meet their own needs (which, as a basic survival strategy, they are genetically programmed to do).
When we blame, condemn, insult, mock, embarrass, shame, humiliate, taunt, goad, guilt-trip, deceive, lie to, bribe, blackmail, moralize with and/or judge a child, we both undermine their sense of Self-worth and teach them to blame, condemn, insult, mock, embarrass, shame, humiliate, taunt, goad, guilt-trip, deceive, lie, bribe, blackmail, moralize and/or judge.
The fundamental outcome of being bombarded throughout their childhood by this ‘invisible’ violence is that the child is utterly overwhelmed by feelings of fear, pain, anger and sadness (among many others). However, mothers, fathers, teachers and other adults also actively interfere with the expression of these feelings and the behavioral responses that are naturally generated by them and it is this ‘utterly invisible’ violence that explains why the dysfunctional behavioral outcomes actually occur.
For example, by ignoring a child when they express their feelings, by comforting, reassuring or distracting a child when they express their feelings, by laughing at or ridiculing their feelings, by terrorizing a child into not expressing their feelings (e.g. by screaming at them when they cry or get angry), and/or by violently controlling a behavior that is generated by their feelings (e.g. by hitting them, restraining them or locking them into a room), the child has no choice but to unconsciously suppress their awareness of these feelings.
However, once a child has been terrorized into suppressing their awareness of their feelings (rather than being allowed to have their feelings and to act on them) the child has also unconsciously suppressed their awareness of the reality that caused these feelings. This has many outcomes that are disastrous for the individual, for society and for nature because the individual will now easily suppress their awareness of the feelings that would tell them how to act most functionally in any given circumstance and they will progressively acquire a phenomenal variety of dysfunctional behaviors, including some that are violent towards themself, others and/or the Earth.
From the above, it should also now be apparent that punishment should never be used. ‘Punishment’, of course, is one of the words we use to obscure our awareness of the fact that we are using violence. Violence, even when we label it ‘punishment’, scares children and adults alike and cannot elicit a functional behavioural response. See ‘Punishment is Violent and Counterproductive’.
If someone behaves dysfunctionally, they need to be listened to, deeply, so that they can start to become consciously aware of the feelings (which will always include fear and, often, terror) that drove the dysfunctional behaviour in the first place. They then need to feel and express these feelings (including any anger) in a safe way. Only then will behavioural change in the direction of functionality be possible. See ‘Nisteling: The Art of Deep Listening’.
‘But these adult behaviors you have described don’t seem that bad. Can the outcome be as disastrous as you claim?’ you might ask. The problem is that there are hundreds of these ‘ordinary’, everyday behaviors that destroy the Selfhood of the child. It is ‘death by a thousand cuts’ and most children simply do not survive as Self-aware individuals. And why do we do this? As noted above, we do it so that each child will fit into our model of ‘the perfect citizen’: that is, obedient and hardworking student, reliable and pliant employee/soldier, and submissive law-abiding citizen.
Moreover, once we destroy the Selfhood of a child, it has many flow-on effects. For example, once you terrorize a child into accepting certain information about themself, other people or the state of the world, the child becomes unconsciously fearful of dealing with new information, especially if this information is contradictory to what they have been terrorized into believing. As a result, the child will unconsciously dismiss new information out of hand.
In short, the child has been terrorized in such a way that they are no longer capable of learning (or their learning capacity is seriously diminished by excluding any information that is not a simple extension of what they already ‘know’).
Fundamentally, the child is now incapable of carefully observing reality, analyzing the evidence in relation to that reality and responding strategically so that conflicts and problems are moved closer to resolution. That is, the child is now unconsciously trapped, believing and behaving precisely within the spectrum of socially-approved beliefs and behaviours that society terrorized them into accepting, no matter how dysfunctional and violent these beliefs and behaviours might be.
In industrialized countries, for example, this will invariably include overconsuming, which is standard (but highly dysfunctional and violent) behaviour, particularly given the current state of the biosphere. See ‘Love Denied: The Psychology of Materialism, Violence and War’.
Responding Powerfully to Reality
So how do we nurture children to become the unique and powerful individual that is their birthright? Someone who is able to clearly identify what they need and what outcomes work for them, and who does not learn to progressively compromise themselves until there is nothing left of their unique identity. Someone, in short, who is so powerless, that they are incapable of considering themself, others and the state of the biosphere. Someone who lives in delusion.
Well, if you want a powerful child, you can read what is required in ‘My Promise to Children’.
If, after reading this ‘Promise’, you feel unable to nurture children properly, you might consider doing the healing necessary so that you can do so. See Putting Feelings First’.
If you already feel free of the delusions that afflict most people and able to respond powerfully to the state  of our world, then consider joining those participating in the fifteen-year strategy outlined in The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth and signing the online pledge of The Peoples Charter to Create a Nonviolent World.
If you are powerful enough to campaign for change against one or more of the ongoing manifestations of violence in the world, consider doing so strategically so that you have maximum impact. See Nonviolent Campaign Strategy.
And if none of the options I have offered immediately above appeals, ask yourself if you are serious about helping to end the violence or just deluding yourself like all of those people I described above.
Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of ‘Why Violence?’ His email address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is here.

Sudan protester under arrest in hospital after being shot

18 Jan 2019
Police in Sudan have fired live ammunition at mourners outside the home of a protester who died after he was shot yesterday on the streets of Khartoum. There’s growing international outrage at the brutal crackdown on protests against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, including the case of 57-year-old Yasser Ali, who was seriously injured by a sniper.
From Sudan, Yousra Elbagir has an exclusive report on what happened to a man who ventured out on a protest on December the 25th, got shot and is now being held in a security hospital.

Meditation and Consciousness


by Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.-
The word ‘conciousness’ is derived from Latin, having its roots in conscio formed by the coalescence of cum meaning ‘with’ and scio meaning ‘know’ (Sousa, 2013). Consciousness has been one of the most important and tantalizing issues ever since the origin of philosophy and medicine (Facco et al., 2017). The understanding of consciousness has been one of the most complex intellectual, philosophical and cognitive challenges faced by a spectrum of disciplines, ranging from quantum physics and psychology to neurosciences (Jasper et al., 1999; Sousa, 2013).
In general terms consciousness is defined as the state of awareness of self and the environment. In biological terms, human consciousness appears as a feature associated with the functioning of the human brain (Gierer, 2008). Consciousness can be defined as the subjective awareness of the momentary experience interpreted in the context of personal memory and present state (John, 2003). The English philosopher John Locke stated that consciousness is the awareness of all that occurs in the mind of a person. According to Meares (1999) self is a manifestation of this highest level of consciousness.
Consciousness is the experience or the content of experience from moment to moment. According to Boly (2011) to be conscious, is to be alert, active and vigilant. Consciousness has two major components: Awareness (i.e., the content of consciousness) and arousal (i.e. the level of consciousness) (Laureys, 2005). Synchronized activity of 10 million neurons over merely 230 ms produce conscious states (Hebb, 1949). Libet (1993) states that consciousness is associated with neuronal activities that persist for a long enough time with a minimal duration of 500 ms.
As described by van Gulick (2004) consciousness is the state or quality of awareness, or, of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. In modern science it is defined as a continuous state of full awareness of the Self and one’s relationship to the external and internal environment, describing the degree of wakefulness in which an organism recognizes stimuli (Jellinger, 2009).
Consciousness arises as a result of integration of many inputs by reentrant interactions in the dynamic core (Edelman, 2003). Consciousness is a rich biological phenomenon and consciousness is based on the premise that phenomenal experience is entailed by neuronal activity in the brain (Seth et al., 2006). The thalamus governs levels of the conscious state and the content of consciousness depends on the activity of various cortical areas (Edelman, 2003). Direct injuries to the central thalamus can alone produce global disturbances of consciousness (Parvizi and Damasio, 2008).
According to the apical dendrite activity theory the pical dendrite part of thalamocortical circuits is the generator of consciousness (LaBerge, 2006). According to the biological theories consciousness is some form of biological state of the brain depends on brain chemistry and electrical impulses. Current research suggests that human consciousness is associated with complex, synchronous interactions between multiple cortical networks (Panda et al, 2016). According to Szirmai and Kamondi (2006) higher functions” of human mental ability have been ascribed to the prefrontal and parietal association cortices. The paleocerebrum, limbic system and their connections have been considered to be the center of emotions, feelings, attention, motivation and autonomic functions.
Consciousness is a primary function and activity of the human brain itself (Mahowald, 1997). Conscious perception arises from dialogue between prefrontal cortex, as the seat of the self, and sensory cortex (Baars et al, 2003). Consciousness is strongly connected with awareness. Neuroimaging studies suggest that frontoparietal activity makes an important contribution to conscious perception (Sousa, 2013). However there is no conscious perception without attention (Mack & Rock, 1998). There are four states of consciousness such as Waking: Sleeping: Dreaming: Meditation.
The American Psychologist William James postulated that our conscious mental life flows continuously like a stream in which “the transition between the thought of one object and the thought of another is no more a break in the thought than a joint in a bamboo is a break in the wood. William James described consciousness as a stream – a continuous succession of experiences. For William James consciousness is something flowing uninterruptedly.
The basic problem of existence, according to the Yoga Sutras, is that one is in ignorance of and separated from pure consciousness (Sedlmeier et al., 2012). Meditation is pure consciousness without objectification. Meditation practice is geared to reach higher consciousness. A.K Nair of the Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences Bengaluru, India indicates that Meditation induces a modified state of consciousness that remains under voluntary control.
Meditative consciousness is characterized by receptive attention to and awareness of present events and experiences. It constitutes the ability to become aware of mental activities such as sensations, images, feelings, and thoughts, and to disengage from judgment, conditioned emotions, and their cognitive processing or automatic inhibition (Gartenschläger et al., 2017). In meditative consciousness there are no cognitive elaborations or emotional reactivity. This state is characterized by improved task performance and decreased stress-related symptomolog and without maladaptive mental processes. Some experts state that in meditative consciousness brain activation in the left prefrontal cortex can be detected via functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Climate change threat to Germans’ need for speed on Autobahn

Draft environmental measures include proposal to impose motorway speed limit

A 120km/h speed limit sign on an Autobahn near Bremen. Photograph: Morris MacMatzen/Reuters

Reuters in Berlin-

The days of unlimited speeding on Germany’s famously fast Autobahn network could be over if the government adopts draft proposals on climate protection put forward by its committee on the future of transport.

Charged with devising recommendations on reducing the environmental harm caused by transport, the committee also proposed fuel tax hikes and electric vehicle quotas to help Germany finally meet European Union emissions targets.

The proposals, outlined in a draft paper seen by Reuters, could prove controversial in car-mad Germany, whose decades-old motorway network is famous for no-limit sections where drivers can put even the fastest cars through their paces.

Germany could be hit with heavy EU fines if it fails to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and poisonous nitrogen oxides. Transport emissions, which have not fallen since 1990, are a particular target for reductions.

The government is torn between the need to protect Germany’s crucial car industry, buffeted by a series of costly emissions cheating scandals in recent years, and the need to act to protect a rapidly deteriorating climate.

The paper says measures including a motorway speed limit of 130km/h (80mph) and fuel tax rises from 2023, the abolition of tax breaks for diesel cars, and quotas for electric and hybrid car sales could deliver half the greenhouse gas emissions cuts that are needed.

The committee has yet to finalise the recommendations. It is due to report its findings at the end of March, which will then be incorporated into a climate change law the government wants to enact this year.

But the committee is well aware that many of its suggestions could be controversial.
“Not every instrument and every measure will be accepted,” reads the draft. “It will take political deftness, diplomatic skill and a willingness to compromise to achieve the climate change goals.”

A bit of meat, a lot of veg - the flexitarian diet to feed 10bn


Food market

  • 17 January 2019

  •  A diet has been developed that promises to save lives, feed 10 billion people and all without causing catastrophic damage to the planet.
    Scientists have been trying to figure out how we are going to feed billions more people in the decades to come.
    Their answer - "the planetary health diet" - does not completely banish meat and dairy.
    But it is recommending we get most of our protein from nuts and legumes (such as beans and lentils) instead.
    Their diet needs an enormous shift in what we pile on to our plates and for us to turn to foods that we barely eat.

    What changes am I going to have to make?

    If you eat meat every day then this is the first biggie. For red meat you're looking at a burger a week or a large steak a month and that's your lot.
    You can still have a couple of portions of fish and the same of chicken a week, but plants are where the rest of your protein will need to come from. The researchers are recommending nuts and a good helping of legumes every day instead.
    There's also a major push on all fruit and veg, which should make up half of every plate of food we eat.
    Although there's a cull on "starchy vegetables" such as the humble potato or cassava which is widely eaten in Africa.

    So what is the diet in detail?

    If you served it all up this is what you would be allowed each day:

    Picture

    1. Nuts - 50g a day
    2. Beanschickpeaslentils and other legumes - 75g a day
    3. Fish - 28g a day
    4. Eggs - 13g a day (so one and a bit a week)
    5. Meat - 14g a day of red meat and 29g a day of chicken
    6. Carbs - whole grains like bread and rice 232g a day and 50g a day of starchy vegetables
    7. Dairy - 250g - the equivalent of one glass of milk
    8. Vegetables -(300g) and fruit (200g)
    The diet has room for 31g of sugar and about 50g worth of oils like olive oil.

    Vavuniya villagers protest against lack of permanent hospital doctor

    Residents from a border village in Vavuniya, Iranai Iluppaikkulam, protested yesterday against the authorities' failure to ensure a permanent doctor at the local hospital.  
    17 January 2019
    Demanding that a permanent doctor be appointed, residents protested outside the Primary Medical Health Care Hospital in the village. 
    "We haven't had any doctor for a month now, and no permanent doctor since 1990," one protester told Tamil Guardian. 
    Over 200 people have faced difficulty accessing adequate healthcare as a result.

    SAME GROUP INVOLVED IN LASANTHA’S MURDER, NOYAHR’S ABDUCTION - CID


                        
    The CID said the same group of suspects had carried out the murder of senior journalist and Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge and the abduction and assault of The Nation’s former Deputy Editor Keith Noyahr.

    The CID’s Gang and Robbery Unit Officer-in- Charge (OIC) Nishantha Silva yesterday informed the Mount Lavinia Magistrate’s Court that the CID found same group of suspects had carried out the murder of Wickrematunge and the abduction and assault of The Nation’s former Deputy Editor Keith Noyahr.

    He made this submission when the inquiry into the murder of slain Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge was taken before the Mount Lavinia Chief Magistrate Mohamed Mihail.
    The Magistrate ordered former Senior DIG Prasanna Nanayakkara to appear before the CID on the last Sunday of each month.

    Wickrematunge was murdered on January 8, 2009 in Attidiya, Ratmalana while on his way to office. Mount Lavinia Police former Crimes OIC, Sub-inspector Tissa Sugathapala was taken into custody by the CID on February 2, 2018 and retired Senior DIG Prasanna Nanayakkara was arrested on February 13. The first suspect in the Wickrematunge murder case, military intelligence officer Premanada Udalagama is out on bail.

    Premanada was taken into custody over the abduction of Wickrematunge’s driver, one of the witnesses in the murder case. President’s Counsel Anura Maddegoda appearing on behalf of retired Senior DIG Prasanna Nanayakkara informed Court that the CID had not taken any action to arrest the real perpetrators in this murder.

    Maddegoda said even after ten years the authorities had failed to deliver justice in Wickrematunge’s murder. The Magistrate ordered the CID to expedite the investigation and fixed further inquiries for May 10.

    Is the Navy lying? Is our press serving us well?


    Rammed boat with bullet holes
     
    In Police jeep: Lax security and cruelly-placed handcuffs

    Family of Munnaichaami
    logoBy S. Ratnajeevan H. Hoole-Friday, 18 January 2019

    Newspapers of 16 January report Indian poachers turning on our Navy. An earlier incident of 23 December where poachers really used violence was hardly reported. All this mis- and non-reporting raise questions of the veracity of our Navy and the irresponsibility of our press to us reader. These newspapers have become willing propaganda tools of the Navy, spreading falsehoods that shield the Navy from any culpability. This article reports my best reconstruction of events.

    Recall that early in the morning on 13 January (Sunday) in the northern seas a total of 28 Indian fishermen were interdicted on the charge of entering Sri Lankan waters without permission. This has been confirmed by the Navy, admitting that they, the Navy itself, had taken them into custody.

    Seventeen fishermen from four boats were arrested in the Delft area and taken to the Kankesanthurai Navy Base, and a further 11 in seas in the proximity of Kilinochchi were interdicted, and taken to the Kiranchi Naval Base. Accordingly, the 11 arrested in Kilinochchi were handed over to the Assistant Commissioner of Fisheries, Kilinochchi and charged. There is no controversy over the Kilinochchi arrests.

    Those 17 Indian Fishermen said to have been arrested in Jaffna were attempted to be handed over by the Navy to the Assistant Commissioner of Fisheries, Jaffna. According to information by the Navy, two staff members from the Fisheries Department went to Kankesanthurai. The staff members returned to the Department on the 13th evening after 4 p.m. However, instead of 17, the department had accepted responsibility only for nine Indians who had come in two boats. The remaining eight who had fished in two further boats, say reports, the Department had refused to accept any responsibility for.

    At the same time, well after Sunday after 5 p.m., Indian media released a report that a total of 29 fishermen had been captured by Sri Lankan authorities. At this point Jaffna reporters knew that something serious was amiss. When queried both the Fisheries Department and the Navy refused further information.

    Some reporters from Jaffna thereupon directly contacted Indian reporters. The latter confirmed that 29 Indians had been captured. Jaffna reporters then obtained 29 names from India and the names of the 28 in Sri Lankan custody. Comparing the two lists, one fisherman named Munnaichaami was seen to be missing from the Sri Lankan Navy’s custody. When it was confirmed that Munnaichaami’s name was missing, Indian sources claimed that Munnaichaami had been murdered by the Sri Lankan Navy. The Indian Consul in Jaffna was now fully alerted and began querying Sri Lankan authorities.

    Upon these developments, the Navy issued a statement that a body had been retrieved from the seas, and that it could be that of Munnaichaami. The body was taken to the Kankesanthurai Navy Base.

    It is inferred by those who know the system that the Fisheries Department refused to accept the eight fishermen from Kankesanthurai because of the missing ninth person, although they had initially claimed that they had refused because the usual evidence like nets had not been given to them to take to court.

    In the circumstance of the Fisheries Department refusing to accept responsibility for body brought to Kankesanthurai and the eight fishermen, the Navy asked the Kankesanthurai Police to assume responsibility. The Police too were reluctant. Following this, the Mallakam Magistrate had his attention drawn to this around 8 p.m. Sunday. The Magistrate ordered the Police to accept the body and report to court. As a result, around 11 p.m. the Jaffna Teaching Hospital accepted the body. The eight fishermen were handed over to the Kankesanthurai Police. All this information was given to the Indian Consul.

    The next morning, Monday, the eight fishermen were met independently by reporters and the Indian Consul at the Kankesanthurai Police Station. It is learnt from the testimony of two of the three fishermen who had travelled with the deceased Munnaichaami, namely Kaarmeham (aged 40), and Selvam (aged 45), that the trawler in which they had travelled had been travelled was stopped by Navy boat made of iron (presumably a Dvora), ordered the fishermen (now in custody) to come on board the Navy ship. Seemingly to facilitate that, the Navy boat was brought close to their trawler, at a high speed, and the iron Navy boat smashed the wooden fishing trawler and penetrated its body. The part of the trawler penetrated by the Navy boat entered the pilot’s cabin of the trawler.

    During that event, the wooden planks from the trawler crushed the person piloting the trawler. The trawler broke into pieces and capsized. The three jumped into the sea and were picked up by the Navy. However, the pilot Munnaichaami went down with the trawler. Munnaichaami had no chance to jump into the sea or otherwise escape. On account of language difficulties the fishermen could not communicate to the Navy the information on the presence of Munnaichaami in the wreckage. As a result, in a short while, the Navy went to Kankesanthurai with just the three fishermen, leaving Munnaichaami behind.

    Likewise, another boat like Munnaichaami’s, a second boat, also has been sunk by the Navy in the vicinity on the same day. The five men who had travelled in the same vessel are with the Navy. In the incident involving the second vessel, two fishermen have been injured – one with serious head injuries that have since been treated by the Navy’s hospital in Kankesanthurai. Of these five, two are young students as learnt from the Kankesanthurai Police Station – one is in Plus 1 Grade in India and the other is in an engineering faculty in India.

    On the same day, a third boat also was hit by Sri Lankan Navy’s Dvora and damaged in the rear end of the Indian boat which managed to make it back to India. The damaged trawler is shown with bullet holes as released by Indian sources.

    As the story broke at 10 a.m. on the 14th, of the eight fishermen, three who travelled with Munnaichaami, were taken to the Teaching Hospital in a Police vehicle. They were manacled with two handcuffs; that is, the man in the middle had both hands cuffed. The practice is not to handcuff such fishermen when taking them to court. They were being taken to identify Munnaichaami’s body.

    Around 11 a.m., these three manacled fishermen identified the body of Munnaichaami who had travelled with them. The three fishermen were then subject to a medical examination at the Teaching Hospital to so that the charge of assault could not be sustained against the Navy. (Those assaulted were the other five who were not brought for a medical examination). These three were then taken back to the Kankesanthurai Police.

    The laxity of security, despite the manacles, is seen in the photo where they are seen being taken to Court transporting the Policemen’s personal effects like a bicycle, and their stopping for diesel on the way.

    According to normal procedure, cases have been filed against all of them. Following the confirmed identification of the body of Munnaichaami, on the 14th a report was submitted to Court and permission obtained by Police for an autopsy. As a result after 5 p.m. that day, Jaffna Teaching Hospital’s JMO Mayoorathan conducted the autopsy. The next day, 15th, having been a holiday, on the 16th morning, on the basis of Munnaichaami’s daughter asking for his body, the Jaffna Consul for India asked Court for custody of the body. The Mallakam Court has authorised the release.

    Why was the Navy careless in coming close to the Indian vessel and ramming it hard enough to sink it? Why did the Navy resort to violence over civil misdemeanours? In answer, it is good to recall a poorly reported incident on 23 December 2018, when the Sri Lankan Navy on small boats (said to be scooter-like) is said to have stopped five Indian fishermen on a fishing boat (presumably in Sri Lanka waters). During that encounter, when the three Navy men tried to bring the Indians ashore, one naval man boarded the Indian boat to be in command of the Indian boat while the other two Navy men were to go in front in their vessels.

    However, the Indian trawler took off towards India with the Sri Lankan on board. The Indians had overcome the Navy man. Having given chase, upon reaching Indian waters, the naval man in captivity was dumped overboard. That naval man had a gun on him and fired at the Indian vessel. Three bullet holes are said to visible. The boat reached the Rameshwaran shore and reported to the Indian authorities. As a result their fishing permit has been suspended by Indian authorities and the incident is reported by the Indian press as well as television channels.

    When such horrible things were reported only by Indian press and sources, the Sri Lankan Navy higher-ups were questioned by many reporters over three days showing them photographs of the rammed boat with bullet holes. The Navy has denied the occurrence of any such incident.

    Therefore people wonder if there is a private mini-war between India and Sri Lanka. Is our Navy hunting Indian fishermen? Is it open season on Indian fishermen because some of them dumped a Navy man in the sea in escaping arrest? Is our press covering up this racist nonsense, making a military campaign out of illegal fishing by poor fishermen? Like the Police shooting at speeding 

    motorists?

    Sumanthiran Says NewsFirst One Of The Worst Offenders Of Misreporting: “Time Has Come To Take Them To Task”

    logo
     Parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran said that time had come to take the MTV/MBC media network, owned by controversial businessman R. Rajamahendran alias Killi Maharaja, to task.
    Sumanthiran
    Speaking at an event in Jaffna, Sumanthiran said, “A few days ago they used one phrase I used in a speech out of context, and falsely reported that I had stated that with the new Constitution, a separate state would be a possibility. That is completely false and directly contradictory to what I said! One of the main things I said in that speech was that we should give up the Eelam dream.”
    The TNA Parliamentarian added that NewsFirst was one of the worst offenders of misreporting.
    He also added, “The media is busy reporting on what various individuals say about the draft Constitution, but don’t look at what draft itself says. The media is intent on reporting deliberately false and misleading news regarding the Constitution. There are many forces in the South that are hoping to prevent a new Constitution being passed, and the media that support such forces spread such false “news”.
    A few days ago they used one phrase I used in a speech out of context, and falsely reported that I had stated that with the new Constitution, a separate state would be a possibility. That is completely false, and directly contradictory to what I said! One of the main things I said in that speech was that we should give up the Eelam dream.
    The whole country knows about MTV. They have been continuously engaging is this dangerous and deliberate false reporting and the time has come to take them to task, and they will be taken to task. I want to tell them that directly today.

    Read More