Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, December 23, 2018

Economy at a crossroads: The way out for Sri Lanka

Prof. H.A. de S. Gunasekara Memorial Oration 2018: Part 3
  • The Professor H.A. de S. Gunasekara Memorial Oration 2018 was delivered by Dr. W.A. Wijewardena on 4 December at the Senate Room of the University of Peradeniya. Today, Daily FT carries Part 3 of a revised and abridged version of the oration

logo

 Monday, 24 December 2018 

The analysis so far

In the previous part, we noted that Professor H.A. de S. Gunasekara, the first Ceylonese professor of economics at the University of Ceylon, was a legend in economics teaching in Sri Lanka. His doctoral thesis to the University of London, ‘From Dependent Currency to Central Banking in Ceylon,’ was a seminal contribution on the development of banking, finance and central banking in colonial Ceylon.



The Five-Year Plan of 1972-76 that was produced under his direction when he was the Secretary to the Ministry of Planning and Employment sought to convert Ceylon, following the policy of the government in power, to a socialist economy. Yet, the diagnosis of economic ailments which Ceylon had been suffering at that time and the prescriptions recommended by him have not been different from what we experience in Sri Lanka today.

Thus, it was a proof that when it comes to economic analysis, both socialist economics and free market economics follow the same path. The difference is only in the end objectives. The main ailments suffered by Ceylon in the entirety of the post independence period have been the low economic growth coupled with imbalances in the budget, savings-investments and the external sector. The external sector crisis has been compounded by the low priority given to the export sector in national economic policy making.

With the introduction of the open economy policy in late 1977, Sri Lanka was able to transform its exports from the three-tree crops to manufacturing which was dominated by apparels. This was facilitated by the transfer of production facilities by the Western nations to labour abundant developing countries, a process known as off-shoring. However, the advancements in science and technology in the new millennium have enabled those nations to shift those production facilities to their own lands, known as on-shoring, and countries close to their markets, known as near-shoring. It is estimated that by 2025 about a two-third of apparel supplies to North American and European markets will be sourced from on-shored or near-shored factories. Sri Lanka’s apparel sector faces a potential risk and the country has to find a way out.


Now let’s look at the way out available for Sri Lanka.


National Export Strategy

Taking into account the above-mentioned global developments today, Sri Lanka has released a new National Export Strategy (NES) in April, 2018. The strategic vision of the document has been to develop Sri Lanka as an export hub, driven by innovation and investment. The hub component of the vision has no practical value since Sri Lanka produces only a limited number of exportable products. NES also has identified four strategic objectives to pursue in order to attain its goal of setting up an export hub in the country.

1.To have a business enabling, predictable and transparent policy and regulatory framework that supports exports;

2.To strengthen Sri Lankan exporters’ market-entry and compliance capacities;

3.To become an efficient trade and logistics hub to facilitate exports; and

4.To drive export diversification through innovation and by strengthening emerging sectors.
Six focus sectors for development

According to NES, an enabling business environment will be created by improved logistics, trade information and promotion, developing a national quality infrastructure and inculcating a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship. Given Sri Lanka’s present endowments and comparative advantages, six main focus sectors have been identified for development during the strategy period.

1.Information Technology (IT) and Business Process Management (BPM);

2.Development of a wellness tourism sector;

3.Boat building;

4.Manufacture of electrical and electronic components;

5.Manufacture of processed food and beverages; and

6.Spices and concentrates.

NES has attempted to break away from Sri Lanka’s reliance on the three tree crops and apparels as the main source of export earnings and develop 6 new areas that include the export of services as well. This vision was expressed by the Prime Minister in November 2015 when he presented the first economic policy statement of the government to Parliament. It was reiterated in subsequent statements as well as the policy document titled Vision 2025 released in June 2017. However, it is after three years that this vision was codified and presented as an export development strategy document by the bureaucracy.

Sri Lanka is at a crossroads today because it is snared in what is known as the middle income trap. It was easy for Sri Lanka to move up from a low income country to a lower middle income country by using its abundantly available cheap labour resources. However, moving up further to an upper middle income country was challenging since the country had to spend about 24 years in the lower middle income country category before making a breakout. Unless it attains an economic growth rate of about 9% per annum in the next 15-year period, it is unlikely that it will be able to beat the middle income trap. The way to do so is to produce for a market bigger than the market in Sri Lanka and supply goods that are demanded by that market. It requires the country to convert its production system from a simple technology based one to a complex technology one and join the global production sharing network to keep its presence in the market

Managing disruptions
Exports will not happen automatically simply because a government body has made a pronouncement. To change the structure of exports of a country within a short period, it is necessary to disrupt the whole economy from top to bottom and across all the sectors. The government machineries which are usually moving at a snail’s pace should be accelerated to the maximum speed possible to provide support services. Labour markets which are rigid and ruled by uncompromising trade unions should be made flexible with respect to entry, exit, on the job training and new skill and talent acquisition.

The biggest disruption to be effected to the labour market is the conversion from the present ‘seniority and fixed salary based system’ to a ‘merit and output-based system’. When a society has lived hundreds of generations in a seniority and elders-worshipping society, it is normally embedded irrevocably in the genes of its members. Thus, the introduction of a merit based system to such a society, however much it is desired, will be a painful exercise. It requires the disruptors to inflict mental violence on the subjects who are to be changed; but the reaction of the subjects too is characterised by a similar response making it difficult to introduce the disruption without social costs.

This may appear to be difficult but not impossible to attain at all. It involves the change of the mindset of people through a back and forth consultative process removing fears and providing assurance. It is quite a challenge and Sri Lanka’s NES will also be subject to this challenge.
Technological advancement is a disruption

Technological advancements are disruptive and therefore painful. Those who are able to predict and adapt to the disruption will be winners, while others will be destined to be losers. Human history has often taught this painful lesson to mankind.

When the motorised vehicles emerged, the horse-driven carts were driven out of the road; when the spinning machines were invented, handlooms had to give in. They made thousands of people around the globe jobless but created new jobs for people who could train themselves to adopt the new technologies. However, a concern for many societies today has been that disruptive technologies are emerging at an exponential rate. It is just like that a person wakes up every morning today to be surprised by the next big thing that has hit the world. It is happening so fast, that it is difficult even to keep pace of them let alone getting trained to adopt them.

Yet, this frightening pessimism has also given rise to hopeful optimism as opined by Peter Diamandis in a TED lecture in 2012. What Diamandis said was that the fear of scarcity is unfounded. The emerging technology can make this world a place of abundance. One has to create a need for it and wait patiently until the next big thing happens in the scientific world. The global community is creating this need for technology creators to meet that need. Then, technology adopters have been able to supply the same in collaboration with the technology creators.

In this manner, the four famous technology adopters in the initial pace, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, were able to beat the middle income trap successfully in 1990s. Today, they have been upgraded from the status of technology adopter to that of technology creator in competition with the rich Western nations.
New technologies to capture the world 

According to McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), there are 12 miracle technologies that are disrupting the world today. The list is not exhaustive but provides a guideline for nations to follow.

1.Mobile internet: Increasingly inexpensive and capable mobile computing devices and Internet connectivity; If you are with a smart phone with internet connection today, you have the entire world at your finger tips. A comparison has been made by MGI on this count with computers of yesteryear: It has said that the most powerful computer in 1975 costing $ 5 million had the same performance of an iPhone today costing only $ 400.

2.Automation of knowledge work: Intelligent software systems that can perform knowledge work tasks involving unstructured commands and subtle judgments. The distributed intelligence now being developed in USA and elsewhere in Europe seeks to replicate human brain and pretty soon most of the brainy work handled by humans will be outsourced to these smart and intelligent computers.

3.The Internet of Things: Networks of low-cost sensors and actuators for data collection, monitoring, decision making, and process optimization; software applications are now being developed in the Western world at a rate that it is practically possible to beat the limitation created by time and space when it comes to human interaction.

4.Cloud technology: Use of computer hardware and software resources delivered over a network or the internet, often as a service; This system of data protection and storage will help people to use only a fraction of the installed capacity in their computers and travel abroad just with a bag of clothes but still access to their data files from any place in the globe. The only requirement is that they should remember their password, but today with new apps, even password management has become possible.

5.Advanced robotics: Increasingly capable robots with enhanced senses, dexterity, and intelligence used to automate tasks or augment humans; These robots will not only handle monotonous routine jobs but also are capable of making decisions faster than humans having processed all the necessary information. Thus, the concept of bounded rationalist which Herbert Simon came up with in 1955 to propose that people are not rational because they cannot access to all the information and even if they have access, they are constrained by a lack of time and ability will be just a thing in the past.

6.Autonomous and near-autonomous vehicles: Vehicles that can navigate and operate with reduced or no human intervention; These are smart vehicles and already vehicle manufacturers have started to fix their products with all types of software packages that help drivers to better control their vehicles while avoiding fatal accidents or crashes.

With the introduction of the open economy policy in late 1977, Sri Lanka was able to transform its exports from the three-tree crops to manufacturing which was dominated by apparels. This was facilitated by the transfer of production facilities by the Western nations to labour abundant developing countries, a process known as off-shoring. However, the advancements in science and technology in the new millennium have enabled those nations to shift those production facilities to their own lands, known as on-shoring, and countries close to their markets, known as near-shoring. It is estimated that by 2025 about a two-third of apparel supplies to North American and European markets will be sourced from on-shored or near-shored factories. Sri Lanka’s apparel sector faces a potential risk and the country has to find a way out

7.Next-generation genomics: Fast, low-cost gene sequencing advanced big data analytics, and synthetic biology (“writing” DNA); this is the most disruptive of the new technologies because sequencing one’s genome will not only be cheaper but also be quicker. This will help the diagnosis of ailments more accurately and find treatments by simply changing the copy of the genome just like we write computer software programs today to handle processing problems.
8.Energy storage: Devices or systems that store energy for later use, including batteries; this is a real contributor to energy saving because it will help the world to develop more energy efficient machines and thereby conserve energy.

9.3D printing manufacturing: Additive manufacturing techniques to create objects by printing layers of material based on digital models; The invention of 3D printers from around early 1980s and reaching its adulthood in early 2010s has been termed as the second industrial revolution because it has enabled producers to use 3D printers to produce practically anything from precise parts of airplanes to cars to body parts. 

10.Advanced materials: Materials designed to have superior characteristics (e.g., strength, weight, conductivity) or functionality; Nano carbons and other strong materials are to replace steel as the main input in producing machines and constructing buildings.

11.Advanced oil and gas exploration and recovery: Exploration and recovery techniques that make extraction of unconventional oil and gas economical; USA and Canada have been able to come up with hydraulic fracturing and octopus horizontal drilling for tapping what was hitherto inaccessible as shale oils and natural gas that lie in shale rocks about five miles deep down in the interior of the earth. USA is to be self-sufficient in natural gas and fossil fuel by 2025 by tapping its vast shale oil fields the northern parts of the country.

12.Renewable energy: Generation of electricity from renewable sources with reduced harmful climate impact; the development of new nano solar photovoltaic solar power harvesters will revolutionise the world’s new renewable energy production methods.

Sri Lanka should orient its education, research and development systems to be a partner of this changing technological base in the world. For this purpose, the resources that are presently directed toward consumption in the budget should be pruned and rationalised to enable the government to divert them to research, development and promote innovative practices.

FT Link
  • Sri Lanka’s economy at crossroads: The 1972-76 Five-Year Plan and its diagnosis of economic ailments – Professor H.A. de S. Gunasekara 2018 Oration – Part 1 can be seen at http://www.ft.lk/columns/Sri-Lanka-s-economy-at-crossroads--The-1972-76-Five-Year-Plan-and-its-diagnosis-of-economic-ailments/4-668469
  • Sri Lanka’s economy at crossroads: The ignored export sector for creating prosperity – Prof. H.A. de S. Gunasekara Memorial Oration 2018: Part 2 can be seen at http://www.ft.lk/columns/Sri-Lanka-s-economy-at-crossroads--The-ignored-export-sector-for-creating-prosperity/4-668976

Go for global production sharing networks

In conclusion, Sri Lanka is at a crossroads today because it is snared in what is known as the middle income trap. It was easy for Sri Lanka to move up from a low income country to a lower middle income country by using its abundantly available cheap labour resources. However, moving up further to an upper middle income country was challenging since the country had to spend about 24 years in the lower middle income country category before making a breakout.

Unless it attains an economic growth rate of about 9% per annum in the next 15-year period, it is unlikely that it will be able to beat the middle income trap. The way to do so is to produce for a market bigger than the market in Sri Lanka and supply goods that are demanded by that market. It requires the country to convert its production system from a simple technology based one to a complex technology one and join the global production sharing network to keep its presence in the market.

The flipside is that these are challenging targets but not impossible since there are many countries that have done so with appropriate investment in science and technology leading to research, development and marketing.

(W.A. Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com.)

Rajapaksa-Sirisena Alliance Undermines Constitutional Council: CC Refuses To Consider Sirisena’s New Nominations On SC Appointments

logoA fresh crisis is brewing with President Maithripala Sirisena opening up new battle lines with the Constitutional Council over the appointment of judges.
President Sirisena
Colombo Telegraph exclusively reported that President Sirisena, in a bid to manipulate the judiciary, has refrained from appointing Justice Gamini Amarasekara and S.Thurairajah as Supreme Court judges despite the CC recommending their names.
Without appointing the two judges with unblemished track records, the President has referred two other names, K.K. Wickremesinghe and Deepali Wijesundara, to the CC for approval to be appointed as the Supreme Court judges.
Meanwhile, Mahinda Rajapaksa, the newly-appointed Opposition Leader also attended the Constitutional Council meeting yesterday and supported the President’s move to nominate two new names to the Supreme Court, undermining the authority of the Constitutional Council.
However, the large majority of Constitutional Council members declined to consider the President’s nominations and decided to stick to their guns. As a result, the Constitutional Council’s previous decision on the appointments of the two judges remain unchanged.
Political observers, however, believe that the President’s resistance to the Constitutional Council will give rise to a new crisis in the days to come. They also believe that the President’s actions to undermine the Constitutional Council’s decisions are likely to be challenged in the apex court in January.

Clash at a construction site in Colombo: 11 Chinese workers arrested


2018-12-23
Eleven Chinese nationals, working at a construction site at Chatham Street, Colombo were arrested following a clash with a group of Sri Lankan Security Personnel at the site on Saturday.
The Police said two Chinese workers and three security personnel were injured following the clash that had taken place on Saturday afternoon following an argument.
They said the Chinese workers were arrested after a complaint was lodge with the Fort Police by a Sri Lankan security officer.
Two of the Chinese workers were admitted to a private hospital in Colombo and undergoing treatment under Police custody.
The Police said the injured Sri Lankans were admitted to the Colombo National Hospital.
The Police said that the arrested Chinese workers had been remanded till December 28 after they produced in the Fort Magistrate's Court.(Darshana Sanjeewa)

Over 48,000 dengue cases, 52 deaths this year

A total of 48,303 dengue cases and 52 dengue deaths had been reported countrywide upto December 20 this year, Epidemiology Unit sources said.

According to sources, the highest number of dengue cases, 9,551 had been reported from the Colombo district while the second highest number, 5,408 had been reported from the Gampaha district. The third highest number of dengue cases, 4,727 had been reported from the Batticaloa district.

“The Colombo Municipal Council (CMC) reported a total of 2,359 dengue cases during the same period.

Other parts of the Colombo district recorded a total of 7192 dengue cases. The total number of dengue cases reported from the Western Province is 17,844,” epidemiologists said.

Meanwhile, medical experts and Consultants advise the public to seek medical treatment without delay for any type of fever without applying home remedies.

“All fever patients need rest and should refrain from attending work or school.Patients are advised to take Paracetamol only.Patients should however refrain from taking other medications, especially Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) such as Ibuprofen cause Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) which can be fatal,” they said. 

Saturday, December 22, 2018

Israel opens probe into killing of Palestinian teenager at West Bank roadblock


Initial investigation reportedly found Qassem al-Abbasi was killed by soldiers despite the vehicle he was in not posing immediate lethal threat

Abbasi's family called for an autopsy to be carried out, and for his body to be returned to them in order that he could be buried (Ma'an news agency)

Saturday 22 December 2018 

The Israeli military has opened a probe into its soldiers' killing of a Palestinian teenager at a roadblock in the occupied West Bank after his family said he was murdered.
Qassem al-Abbasi, a 17-year-old from occupied East Jerusalem, was shot dead by Israeli soldiers on Thursday as the car he was travelling in failed to stop at a roadblock near the city of Ramallah.
"The military police have opened an investigation into the death of the passenger," an army spokesperson told the AFP news agency on Friday.
According to the spokesperson, the soldiers fired warning shots into the air after the vehicle in which Abbasi was a passenger drove past a roadblock without stopping.
As the car attempted to do the same at a second roadblock close by, the soldiers again fired warning shots, "before aiming at the car, killing one of the occupants and injuring another passenger," the spokesperson said.
READ MORE►
According to a report on the Israeli news site Ynet, an initial investigation found "the vehicle did not try to hit the soldiers at the roadblocks and no weapon was found in the car".
In a press statement on Friday, family elder Moussa al-Abbasi said Abbasi had been murdered and demanded a full investigation into the shooting.
The family also called for an autopsy to be carried out, and for Abbasi's body to be returned to them in order that he could be buried.
Qassem's cousin, Mohammed al-Abbasi, told The Associated Press that he, Qassem, and a friend were driving out of Ramallah when an Israeli soldier told them the road was shut.
Abbasi said when they tried to make a U-turn, a soldier fired at their vehicle, shattering the rear window and hitting Qasim in the back.
Abbasi said he and his friend, who was driving, were not injured.
He said they were released after being questionned by police.
Tensions in the occupied West Bank have ratcheted up in recent weeks following two attacks on Israeli soldiers and settlers.
Palestinian gunmen shot and killed three Israelis, two of them soldiers, near Ramallah on 13 December.
Meanwhile, on 9 December, a drive-by shooting near the illegal Israeli settlement of Ofra wounded a pregnant woman, who prematurely gave birth to a baby which then died.
Israeli forces are still searching for the assailants.
Five Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli military in that time, most recently on 14 December in the al-Jalazone refugee camp.

Gaza deaths

Separately, an 18-year-old Palestinian shot by Israeli forces while protesting in the Gaza Strip on Friday died of his wounds on Saturday, health officials said.
Ayman Shehr was shot in the stomach in central Gaza's Deir Al-Balah. Three other Palestinians were killed by Israel's military during Friday's demonstrations in the besieged coastal enclave.
According to Gaza's health ministry, one of those killed, Mohammed al-Jahjuh, was 16 years old.
A relative of 16-year-old Palestinian Mohammad Jahjouh is comforted as she mourns during his funeral in Gaza City (Reuters)
More than 40 others were wounded during the protests, the ministry said, including two journalists and four medical workers.
Since a protest movement dubbed "the Great March of Return" began in March, at least 239 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces.
Most were victims of Israeli live fire, however some have been killed by air strikes and tank fire.
Two Israeli soldiers have been killed over the same period.
Thousands of Palestinians in Gaza are protesting every Friday, calling for the Israeli siege on the enclave to be lifted and the right of return for Palestinians displaced from their homes in 1948 during the creation of Israel.

Chasing dreams outside Gaza’s walls

Omar Elemawi films Palestinian rapper Ibrahim Ghunaim (MC Gaza) in front of destroyed buildings in Gaza City
Omar Elemawi and Palestinian rapper Ibrahim Ghunaim (MC Gaza) work on one of their music videos in Gaza in 2017.
 Mohammed SalemReuters

Hamza Abu Eltarabesh- 21 December 2018




Traveling is a distant dream for most people in Gaza.
Gaza’s economy is in freefall: there is widespread poverty, little hope, no prospects and the
 regular bouts of violence affects everyone. The sheer enormity of people’s situation here 
means thoughts of leaving are uppermost in the minds of many, especially the young and
 ambitious.
Everyone complains about the situation. Ride a taxi, go to the market, walk in the street, pray 
at the mosque: the thought of emigrating preoccupies, even when crossings are closed, travel 
permits are rare and finances are limited.
This need for new horizons – any horizon – is especially acute among creative professionals, journalists, artists, musicians and writers.
People like Hosam Salem, 29, and Mahmoud Abu Salama, 30, both photojournalists.
Salem and Abu Salama lived in the same neighborhood, Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza, and they would often collaborate on projects, sometimes also with this writer.

A beautiful eye

Six months ago, Abu Salama, without much warning, sold all his equipment. He had decided to leave and needed the money to pay his way through the Rafah crossing with Egypt and on.
Having secured $3,000, he paid $1,700 to cross into Egypt. He arrived in Turkey with no camera, little money but plenty of experience and a beautiful eye.
Traveling through the Rafah crossing is a costly undertaking that involves getting on a coordination list. This is a list that contains tens of Palestinian passenger names from Gaza who pay a large sum of money, usually from $1,500 to $2,000, to travel agencies in Gaza that have good relations with Egyptian officers working on the other side of the Rafah crossing.
The Egyptian side sends these names to the Palestinian side of the crossing to allow those on the list to access the border before other passengers.
The biggest portion of the coordination fee goes to the Egyptian side, according to a travel agent in Gaza who did not want to be named for this article.
If the passenger pays $2,000, $1,800 will go to an Egyptian officer – not a government office, this is a direct bribe – with the power to put names on the coordination list, the agent told The Electronic Intifada. The rest will go to the agent in Gaza.
Abu Salama’s motivation for leaving was both personal and professional. In 2017, he won a National Geographic award and several local prizes.
An Egyptian entry stamp in a passport.
Mahmoud Abu Salama finally managed to secure enough money to pay the bribe securing this stamp to leave Gaza in June.
 Mahmoud Abu Salama
“I’ve done everything I can for Gaza,” Abu Salama told The Electronic Intifada. “But I didn’t find myself in this city, there’s no horizon and my work wasn’t appreciated.”
Politics were the main reason to move for the father of two, who is waiting to be properly settled before he brings his family over.
“The political conditions we’re going through don’t guarantee any future for us or for our families. The frustration is overwhelming in Gaza, and I’m always feeling helpless. I lost trust in everyone and decided to leave this misery behind me and find a new way to pursue my dreams to be an international photographer.”

36th time lucky

Salem left Gaza in October. The young photographer did not lack for opportunities. He had secured steady freelance opportunities with both local and international media since 2008 and the war on Gaza then.
Still he chose to leave it all behind. In part, his decision was professional.
He hopes to open a photography gallery in Istanbul, where there are opportunities for such work, unlike Gaza.
In the past, he received a number of invitations to exhibit his work in galleries abroad. Yet he was unable to accept them because he couldn’t get out of Gaza.
“I tried to travel through Rafah 35 times in the last six years, but every time I faced some trouble,” Salem told The Electronic Intifada. “Either the crossing was closed, I didn’t have the coordination money, I couldn’t get a visa, I couldn’t renew my passport. Always something.”
Finally he used the money his mother had insisted he save for marriage to leave. But his willingness to defy his mother’s wishes that he marry and settle in Gaza was about much more than just ambition.
Yaser Murtaja, the journalist who was killed on the second Friday of the Great March of Return, was a close friend. After his death, Salem was depressed and stayed home for two weeks.
“After two weeks, I decided to get back to work. But I wasn’t the same person anymore. I wasn’t active enough and I wasn’t able to get inspiration to take creative photos,” Salem said.
“After Yaser was killed, I couldn’t taste life anymore in Gaza. Everything turned grey in my eyes and the political situation was stuck. I decided to travel as soon as possible.”
One day, Salem said, he might come back to Gaza.
“But not now. We live in a big prison. Life outside Gaza is never the same as inside.”

Gaza’s director and rapper

At the beginning of 2010, two young men – Ibrahim Ghunaim, 28, a rapper from Gaza who goes by MC Gaza, and film director Omar Elemawi, 27 – decided to combine their talents and produce videos focused on youth and the social reality in Gaza.
The two friends borrowed a camera and began work on a music video, eventually released in 2012, written and sung by Ghunaim and directed by Elemawi.
“We had the idea and a plan, but no tools,” said Ghunaim. “We needed to borrow everything from friends. It was embarrassing but we dreamed big and we had to do it, whatever it took.”
As the years went by, both developed their talents and the work began to get noticed even as the subjects cut to the core. In 2014 they produced a song about Palestine’s political division. In 2016, they released a trackabout the physical risks of war and conflict to children.
In 2016, they produced a song about reconstruction. And earlier this year they produced one about Palestinian reconciliation.
Their growing success brought job offers. Elemawi was invited to work for Watania Media Agency with a decent salary, while Ghunaim became a popular singer much in demand.
Still, in April, both left Gaza. Each paid $1,500 to cross Rafah, and neither has returned.
Elemawi went to Istanbul to participate in a conference on cinema while Ghunaim traveled to Tunisia to prepare to collaborate with Lotfi Bouchnak, a singer famous throughout the Arab world.
“I wanted to leave Gaza for many reasons,” Elemawi, with whom this writer went to school, told The Electronic Intifada. The visa he was granted for the conference in April had enabled him to stay on in Turkey to seek more permanent residence.
“The situation in Gaza affects our psychological condition. Everyone is frustrated and this started to affect the quality of my work and my ability and willingness to be creative.”
He, too, found that his ambitions to grow professionally had been thwarted by the closure on Gaza imposed by Israel and Egypt.
“I had 12 invitations to participate in different conferences, but the closure prevented me from attending any of them. I wanted to take a new path in my career and build new working relationships with international directors instead of contacting them on social media only.”
Gaza offers little room for development.
“I reached a stage where I couldn’t develop myself anymore. Now, outside the walls of Gaza, I can achieve my ambition,” said Elemawi.
Ghunaim shared similar reasons with The Electronic Intifada, though he also found public space for his art restricted in Gaza.
“Rap is far from Gaza’s traditions. At first, some people attacked my art but things got better with time, especially when they saw I was reflecting the humanitarian and political situation here.”
The opportunity to go to Tunisia was impossible for him to turn down.
“Now, I’m preparing for my biggest work in Tunisia and I’m really satisfied with what I have achieved.”

Political frustration

Isra Almodallal’s move to Turkey was more unexpected.
Almodallal, 28, was a successful journalist in Gaza and well-known locally. She had worked as an English-language spokesperson for Gaza’s authorities, and had a spell as a presenter with the media channel run by UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestine refugees.
Now, however, she works for the Turkish channel TRT in Turkey.
“I don’t think it’s easy to handle the situation of Gaza,” she told The Electronic Intifada. “No one can live without hope or any sense of a clear future or even being able to control his or her present. In Gaza, you never have the power to make any radical change in your life, this can happen only outside this prison.”
The “political frustration” in Gaza is felt by everyone, she said, blaming the political division between the West Bank and Gaza for much of it.
“We live under a failed leadership that didn’t pay attention to the hopes of the young generations. I wanted to have a decent, secure and stable life for me and my family.”
She would, she said, one day return to Gaza, “to inspire others.” But for now, at least, “I’m very happy.”
Hamza Abu Eltarabesh is a journalist from Gaza.

Palestinians in Iraq fearful after loss of Saddam-era privileges

Palestinian children are seen going to school in the Baladiyat neighbourhood of Baghdad , Iraq December 16, 2018. REUTERS/Thaier al-Sudani

DECEMBER 20, 2018

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A year after the Iraqi parliament voted to strip Palestinians of the equal-rights status they enjoyed under Saddam Hussein, Palestinians living in Iraq feel marginalised and vulnerable.

Last year parliament rescinded legislation that guaranteed Palestinians rights and privileges enjoyed by Iraqi citizens - from eligibility for state jobs and free education to receiving pensions and food items from a government subsidies programme.

The law had been decreed by Saddam, the longtime strongman president who was executed in 2006 after being ousted three years before by the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Many Palestinian families have seen their economic situation deteriorate since parliament’s action - and those interviewed by Reuters were keen to find refuge in other countries - but this was not the start of their difficulties in post-Saddam Iraq.

As predominantly Sunni Muslims, Palestinians have been increasingly viewed with suspicion by Iraq’s Shi’ite Muslim majority, who were at times persecuted under the Sunni Saddam.

Iraqi security forces have carried out repeated raids in search of suspected Sunni Islamist militants among Palestinians living in predominantly Shi’ite areas.

Late one night in 2015, Fawzi al-Madhi’s evening was disrupted by a loud banging on the door.

When Madhi, 56, opened the door, a SWAT team knocked him over and searched his flat.

“They grabbed my sons while they were sleeping and tied them up, Madhi’s wife Um Mohammed recalled, wiping tears away. “I was yelling, ‘Leave my sons alone...Leave them alone,’ and suddenly one of them hit me in the arm with their pistol.”

The security forces left after arresting the couple’s two sons Mihad and Abdul Rahman - on what grounds, their father said he still does not know.

ONE SON FREED, OTHER STILL MISSING

Abdul Rahman, now 21, was released 28 days later after what his parents described as torture in custody. “He couldn’t use his hands to eat. I was helping him. I was feeding him with my hand,” Um Mohammed said.

Mihad, 25, did not make it home. More than three years since his detention, his whereabouts remain unknown to his family.

“We still don’t know if our son is dead or still alive. If he’s dead we want his body to get a burial ceremony, and if he’s alive we want to know where he is and why they took him,” said Madhi, seated in his apartment with his wife and young daughter.

Fearing for their lives, Madhi sent Abdul Rahman and another son, Mohammed, 25 - who avoided arrest by staying in the home of a relative - to Turkey a month after Abdul Rahman was released.

PALESTINIANS CAME IN THREE WAVES

Palestinians came in three waves to Iraq: first in 1948 as refugees from the war surrounding Israel’s creation, then in 1967 when Israel seized the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and in the 1990s after being expelled by Gulf states at odds with Saddam.

Portraying himself as a defender of the Palestinian cause for statehood, Saddam gave them subsidised housing and the right to work - rare privileges for foreign refugees that bred resentment among many Iraqis.

But worsening conditions since 2003 have forced at least 25,000 Palestinians to flee Iraq, leaving only around 10,000 in the country, said Fouad Hajjo, media and cultural counsellor at the Palestinian embassy in Baghdad.

“If they don’t want us to stay in Iraq, then I want my son back and we will leave,” said Um Mohammed.

Slideshow (6 Images)

Ayman Ahmed, who runs a small watch shop in a Palestinian-inhabited apartment complex in the east of the capital Baghdad, said his life had become increasingly precarious since 2003, replete with threats from unknown persons.

“We want an immediate exit from Iraq to any other country whether an Arab or (other) foreign state. We’re tired and fed up, we’ve run out of patience,” he said in his shop on a narrow dusty road fouled by uncollected garbage and overflowing sewage.

A spokesman for Iraq’s Migration and Displacement Ministry said it hoped to get parliament to restore some benefits for Palestinians including subsidised foodstuffs.

Reporting by Reuters Video News in Baghdad; Writing by Ahmed Rasheed; Editing by Mark Heinrich

It’s official. We lost the Cold War.

President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at their July meeting in Helsinki. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)



Perhaps the timing of George H.W. Bush’s death last month was merciful. This way he didn’t have to see America lose the Cold War.

Bush presided over the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991. But the triumph he and others earned with American blood and treasure over 71 years, defeating the Soviet Union and keeping its successor in check, has been squandered by President Trump in just two.

Trump’s unraveling of the post-war order accelerated this week when he announced a willy-nilly pullout from Syria, leaving in the lurch scores of allies who participated in the campaign against the Islamic State, throwing our Kurdish partners to the wolves, isolating Israel, and giving Russia and Iran free rein in the Middle East. Then word emerged that Trump is ordering another hasty withdrawal, from Afghanistan. Trump’s defense secretary, retired Gen. Jim Mattis, resigned in protest of the president’s estrangement of allies and emboldening of Russia and China.

The TV series “The Man in the High Castle” imagines a world in which Nazis won World War II. But we don’t need an alternative-history show to imagine a Soviet victory in the Cold War. We have Trump.

Mattis, in his memorable resignation letter (a bookend to George Kennan’s “long telegram” of 1946) wrote: “We must do everything possible to advance an international order that is most conducive to our security, prosperity and values, and we are strengthened in this effort by the solidarity of our alliances. Because you have the right to have a secretary of defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position.”

Mattis spelled out the views of his that are apparently not “aligned” with Trump’s: “treating allies with respect,” believing in the 29 NATO democracies (Trump has repeatedly raised questions about NATO’s utility); respecting the 74-nation “defeat-ISIS coalition” (now to be abandoned in Syria); and recognizing threats from China and Russia, which “want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model . . . at the expense of their neighbors, America and our allies.”

Mattis to leave administration in February

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis submitted a letter Dec. 20 saying he would step down in February. Lawmakers are expressing concerns about his departure. (Video: Sarah Parnass /Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

Republicans now profess to be alarmed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has enabled Trump at every step, says he’s “particularly distressed.” Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) sees “chaos.” But that is too little, too late. Turkey says it will postpone an invasion of Syria as U.S. forces leave — the better to “bury” our Kurdish allies. And Russian President Vladimir Putin exults:

“American troops should not be in Syria and have been there illegally.”

Indeed, a Soviet leader hardly could have outlined a better scenario than Trump has created for Putin:
A rift between the United States and NATO allies over the future of the alliance.
A U.S. demand that Russia be returned to the Group of Seven , as Russia continues provocations in Ukraine.

A U.S. threat to pull out of the World Trade Organization, and a round of U.S.-imposed tariffs that severely weakened it.

A U.S. president abandoning human rights, accepting Saudi Arabia’s murder of a U.S.-based journalist and embracing repressive leaders around the globe.

A U.S. president creating a rift with Europe over Iran (the nuclear agreement) and climate change (the Paris accord).

A U.S. president embracing as “very honorable” North Korea’s brutal dictator without any tangible concessions on nuclear weapons.

A U.S.-launched trade war that, the Federal Reserve said this week, is partially responsible for cooling worldwide growth.

Lost confidence among Americans in elections, the Justice Department, the FBI, the courts and the free press.

And the loss of a bipartisan consensus against the Russian threat. Forty percent of Republicans called Russia an ally or friend in a Gallup poll, up from 22 percent in 2014.

Why has Trump squandered so much for so little? Maybe it’s because, during the 2016 campaign, Russia was privately negotiating a business deal in Moscow with him and releasing stolen documents that hurt his Democratic opponent. (Meanwhile, Trump was praising Putin and his campaign was softening the GOP platform on Russia.)

Whether special counsel Robert S. Mueller III concludes there was a quid pro quo, Putin clearly has benefited from Trump’s presidency.

In Helsinki, in front of the world, Trump accepted Putin’s word over that of U.S. intelligence agencies. Trump has chafed at aides’ insistence on Russia sanctions, and the few who could resist Trump’s pro-Putin instincts are gone: H.R. McMaster, Rex Tillerson, John Kelly and now Mattis.
Generations of Americans paid any price and bore any burden, from Berlin to Saigon to Havana.
Now, 29 years after the wall fell, Trump is handing Moscow the Cold War victory it could never win.
Read more from Dana Milbank’s archive, follow him on Twitter or subscribe to his updates on Facebook.

Al-Shabaab car bomb kills at least 16 in Mogadishu

Police in Somalia say suicide bomber blew themselves up near presidential palace

Somali women walk past wreckage of the car bomb in Mogadishu. Photograph: Feisal Omar/Reuters

Associated Press in Mogadishu-
A vehicle packed with explosives has been detonated at a military checkpoint near Somalia’s presidential palace, killing at least 16 people and wounding more than 20 others, police said.

The al-Qaida-linked al-Shabaab, which often targets Mogadishu, has claimed responsibility for the attack.

Those killed include three members of staff from the London-based Universal TV station, including the prominent journalist Awil Dahir Salad, police spokesman Mohamed Hussein said.

The bomber targeted the checkpoint near the rear entrance of the heavily fortified palace, Hussein said. An MP and a deputy mayor of Mogadishu were among those wounded, he said.

Soldiers also were among the dead, Col Ahmed Mohamud said.

The blast and a second, smaller one nearby appeared to target those heading to work on what was a business day in tSomalia. A plume of smoke rose over the capital as ambulances rushed to the scene.

“At first I saw a vehicle driving to and fro, then we tried to stop people walking here and there, and then in the blink of an eye the vehicle exploded, causing havoc,” traffic police officer Mohamed Harun said.

Al-Shabaab was pushed out of Mogadishu years ago, but continues to control large parts of rural southern and central Somalia.

The US military, which works with Somali forces and a 20,000-strong African Union peacekeeping mission, has greatly increased airstrikes against al-Shabaab under Donald Trump. At least 47 US strikes have been carried out this year.

Donorbox falls prey to Israel’s covert campaign against BDS

The BDS movement has gained global support as a nonviolent way to challenge Israeli occupation and apartheid. It is modeled on the campaign that helped end aparthied in South Africa.
Ahmad Al-BazzActiveStills

Ali Abunimah- 21 December 2018
Donorbox has fallen prey to an Israeli government smear campaign to sabotage and silence advocates for full and equal Palestinian rights.
“After legal threats and false allegations from Shurat HaDin-The Israel Law Center, the donation platform Donorbox has temporarily suspended the BDS National Committee’s account, disabling its ability to fundraise for its human rights advocacy at the height of the charity season,” the civil rights group Palestine Legal saidFriday.
The BDS National Committee, or BNC, is the steering group for the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign for Palestinian rights.
According to the Associated Press, the Shurat HaDin complaint was “submitted in coordination with Israel’s strategic affairs ministry.”
“This decision does not mean that we consider BDS to be a nefarious organization,” Donorbox said, according to the AP. “We are merely reviewing evidence following this complaint. Their donation forms were closed as a precautionary measure.”
Shurat HaDin, an Israeli group linked to the Mossad spying and assassination agency, employs spurious and politically motivated legal proceedings in an effort to harass, silence and deter supporters of Palestinian rights.
In one recent example, Shurat HaDin sued two New Zealand human rights activists for writing an article calling on the pop star Lorde not to play in Israel, in solidarity with Palestinians suffering under Israeli military occupation and siege.
Legal experts dismissed the judgment against the New Zealand activists as meritless and unenforceable.

“Unlawful interference”

Lawyers are saying that Shurat HaDin’s attempt to shut down the BNC’s fundraising is baseless and illegal.
“The accusations from Shurat HaDin are false and based on flimsy legal theories,” Dima Khalidi, director of Palestine Legal, said. “Shurat HaDin are themselves engaging in unlawful interference with the BNC’s peaceful grassroots advocacy to achieve freedom and equality for Palestinians. We call on Donorbox to complete its investigation rapidly and reinstate BNC’s account.”
Maria LaHood, deputy legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, called Donorbox’s action “one more example of a widespread effort to punish Palestinian existence and thwart advocacy for Palestinian rights.”
Palestine Legal added that “accusations that the BNC’s fundraising in any way constitutes ‘material support for terrorism,’ as Shurat HaDin has insinuated, rely on unsupported and false claims that funds raised by the BNC ‘may’ go to groups designated as terrorist organizations by the US government.”

“Terrorism” smears

Israeli strategic affairs minister Gilad Erdan called Donorbox’s decision “a significant achievement in our efforts to counter the discriminatory BDS campaign.”
Erdan’s ministry is spearheading Israel’s overt and covert efforts to smear the nonviolent BDS movement that is modeled on the global campaign that helped end apartheid in South Africa.
In November, The Electronic Intifada published in full an undercover Al Jazeera documentary that revealed some of the ministry’s tactics.
The documentary was censored after Israel lobby pressure on Qatar, which funds Al Jazeera.
The leaked film can be viewed online.
It shows Sima Vaknin-Gil, the director-general of the strategic affairs ministry, claiming to have leading neoconservative think tank the Foundation for Defense of Democracies working on Israel’s behalf to undermine activist groups.
The undercover footage shows Vaknin-Gil claiming that “We have FDD. We have others working on” projects including “data gathering, information analysis, working on activist organizations, money trail. This is something that only a country, with its resources, can do the best.”
In the film, FDD’s Jonathan Schanzer is heard complaining to an undercover reporter that his “research” – false allegations – that Students for Justice in Palestine groups on US campuses have ties to terrorism financing has failed to gain any traction.
Schanzer explains that he is also trying to link the BDS movement with “terrorism,” but admits he has no real evidence to back up his smears.
The documentary also reveals how another US-based group, the Israel on Campus Coalition, coordinates with the strategic affairs ministry in a massive surveillance effort targeting US college campuses.
The Israel on Campus Coalition then uses anonymous websites to smear and intimidate student activists and educators, in what the group’s director Jacob Baime terms “psychological warfare.”
It is clear that the Israeli ministry, along with Shurat HaDin, is using the same kinds of tactics to pressure and scare Donorbox into stopping Americans and others from participating in an entirely legal and legitimate human rights campaign.
Omar Barghouti, a co-founder of the BDS movement, said, “They are making categorically false allegations, threatening and bullying our partners and service providers in a desperate attempt to undermine our ability to challenge Israel’s regime of apartheid and oppression.”
Israel and its lobby are using similar tactics against solidarity activists and journalists in Europe.
Donorbox’s submission to Israel’s pressure comes at a time when ever more mainstream voices, including senators Dianne Feinstein and Bernie Sanders, and even The New York Times editorial board, are publicly opposing efforts to criminalize support for Palestinian rights as a violation of the First Amendment.