Colombo DIG Ajith Rohana speaking at the Women in Management (WIM) event held last week in Colombo
Friday, 14 December 2018
The current female labour force participation in Sri Lanka is around 36%. This means that a disproportionate majority of women still remain outside the labour market, with limited or no access to wages, pensions and other benefits tied to gainful employment.
Today 29% of the GDP of Sri Lanka is contributed directly by women, as against 11% in Pakistan, 18% in India and 19% in Bangladesh, which means that Sri Lanka is generally ahead in the South Asian region. However, the participation of women in the workforce needs to increase. Evidence largely points to several constraints that effectively limit women’s participation in the labour force – ranging from outdated legislation to the lack of access to vocational training and also due to cultural barriers. It is increasingly evident that social and cultural factors play a defining role in determining women’s inclusion in the labour market. Given that Sri Lanka is short of blue collar workers, increasing women’s access to employment is necessary to increase female participation in the Labour force.
A multiple stakeholder group recently set up at the national level to look at providing greater access for women to the labour market recommended that the government set itself a goal of increasing female labour force participation to 40% by 2020. Therefore, getting more women into the workforce is not just a human rights issue but it is a necessity to sustain our economic growth. Many Sri Lankan women seeking to enter the workplace in Sri Lanka today face a multitude of challenges, including gender discrimination, greater household responsibilities and gender-based disparities in income. Therefore attitudes both at the office and at home need to change for more women to take their place in the workforce.
One of the most effective ways for Sri Lanka to expand its workforce is simply to get more women to join the labour force. Workforce diversity can also enrich businesses at every level. Reluctance Sri Lankan women might be reluctant to enter the workforce mainly due to family commitments. Traditional responsibilities as a woman can affect their choice of employment. Furthermore, educated women even give up on their career to focus on motherhood and their families. Some companies are hesitant to provide career opportunities to pregnant women and mothers. This can contribute to educated married women not engaging in paid employment. Women may also be discriminated in Sri Lanka at the point of the job adverts that ask only for male candidates. Some companies still continue to look for only male applicants to fill certain vacancies, especially certain top level management positions. This can discourage women from entering the workforce or limit opportunities to climb up the organisational ladder.
The expectation that men are more capable than women in certain roles still prevails in society. Another reason is a lack of safety. If women are asked to work late hours without transportation facilities being provided they might be discouraged from engaging in such jobs. Furthermore, women may face difficulties like violence and sexual harassment at workplaces. Options
Therefore, it is important to provide flexible working hours and assure safe transport and a safe working environment for women by introducing more policies against harassment. Provision of safe childcare and day care for mothers can also encourage women having children to enter the workforce. Because for women, being married and having children reduces the opportunity of entering the workforce, whereas being married encourages men to enter paid employment. Because sometimes companies believe that mothers are less committed to work since they have other commitments and that fathers are more committed to their workplace. Attitudes of people and companies can also affect the rate of female participation in the workforce.
For instance, women are believed to be less capable in certain specific roles even though they are equally capable and as proficient as men. Also, the attitude of their families towards certain jobs can hinder them from entering the workforce. Differences in the way that the labour market values the skills of men and women can make educated women reluctant to enter the workforce. Therefore offering young women access to career counselling and designing courses of study that create candidates for available jobs, while policymakers work on addressing institutional and legal issues that hamper women’s participation and integration in the economy, are all crucial steps that need to be taken.
The leafy village of Beragama in Hambantota district is a throwback to a time when Sri Lanka was trying to get on to the Chinese development highway.
Far from the cranes, concrete high rises, widening highways and Chinese workers that are now a mainstay in many parts of the island, Beragama, 250 kilometres south of the capital Colombo, is still covered by verdant paddy fields.
Villagers mostly use old bicycles to get around and the village temple, located at Beragama’s highest point, is still its nerve centre.
But over the top of the temple’s white stupa you can still see the large cranes of Hambantota harbour, built with Chinese funds in 2010 and now operated by China Merchant Port Holdings on a 99-year lease that came into effect last year.
“They have been here since 2008,” said Vimalabudhi Thero, the chief monk at the temple, alluding to the year construction started on the port.
Like investments in the ports of Gwadar in Pakistan and Chittagong in Bangladesh, Hambantota port is a key part of China’s Belt and Road initiative that is building infrastructure and boosting regional connectivity and trade across strategic maritime and land routes.
For a decade, Vimalabudhi had few problems with the Chinese-funded projects that were coming up in Hambantota at break-neck speed. Then President Mahinda Rajapaksa launched a series of projects in his home constituency. The most visible Chinese backed projects were the new highways, cutting south through the western slopes of the island, two port projects and a new airport, among others.
It was in 2017, when Rajapaksa was defeated, that the monk from Beragama became really concerned. Burdened by heavy debt, the Sri Lankan government was looking for a release valve. The country owes at least one fifth of its over $50 billion foreign debt to China. The situation was worsened by a stagnant economy and non-preforming projects like the Mattala International Airport, known as the world’s emptiest airport. The port has recorded negative growth.
The new government of President Maithripala Sirisena and Premier Ranil Wickremasinghe came up with a plan: they would hand over a majority control of the Hambantota Port to the Chinese in a $1.2 billion deal.
Vimalabudhi was alarmed that the agreement also included provisions for an additional 15,000-acre investment zone that would cover large portions of land in Beragama. “There were plans to take over land from our villages for this, and from what we could see they were after the most fertile land,” he said looking at the lush paddies outside his temple.
Last year Vimalabudhi was in the forefront of public protests against the investment zone, which ultimately stalled the plans despite the port handover going through. However, the government is yet to scrap the plans so the villagers remain fearful they will still lose their land.
Villagers in Beragama protesting against government surveyors who visited the village in January 2017. Photo Credit: Amantha Perera“Look at what they have done to our land, it looks like a giant hedgehog has been here,” said Dharamadasa Banda a 70-year-old villager.
All across Sri Lanka’s Southern Province, large swathes of agricultural land and shrub jungle have been cut open for Chinese-backed projects like the extension of a highway and link roads. Inland from the airport, bulldozers are taking the earth needed for the highway with indelible effects.
Trampling elephant habitat
The stretch of the highway linking the empty airport to the port cuts through key elephant corridors. It’s being built by China Communication Construction Company. Three quarters of the 489-hectare project runs through shrub jungle, according to an environmental assessment report obtained by the local rights body Center for Environmental Justice.
“According to the records of the Department of Wildlife Conservation there are more than 400 elephants roaming in the Managed Elephant Range and those moving between the parks also use this area on a regular basis,” the report states adding that animals roam as much as 25 kilometres a day. Between 15%-20% of the island’s elephant population could live in the project area, the department estimates.
The airport was also built on elephant habitat, and wildlife officials in Hambantota are frequently called up to chase the pachyderms off the runway.
Elephants crossing the road near the Hambantota airport. Photo Credit: Rahul Samantha Hettiarchchi
Lack of information sparks anger and confusion
Information on the environmental impacts of the port and highways has been limited. However, available reports, such as the environmental impact assessment of the Southern Highway extension, or the supplementary environmental impact assessment of the Port City raise, serious concerns.
Landslides are one of the major risks identified. A Right to Informationrequest to the Ministry of Higher Education and Highways in August revealed that the authorities had identified 13 landslide prone locations on the 143 kilometre stretch of the Southern Highway between the capital and Matara.
Four of the locations have already experienced landslides along with one other location that was not identified as being in danger. In May 2017, large areas of the highway were flooded during high monsoon rains. One of the lasting images of the floods was the southern exit of the highway with its semi-circular arch half submerged.
“We have never experienced any such thing in this area. The flood waters used to flow downstream to the west in the past. The highway looked as if it was blocking the waters,” said Indrarathne Abeysinghe, who lives near the exit point.
Soon after the floods then Minister of Megapolis Development Champika Ranawaka blamed the disaster on ad-hoc development projects specifically mentioning the Southern Highway as lacking a detailed environmental assessment report. His cabinet colleague Minster of Home Affairs Vajira Abeywardene argued the highway was constructed properly and was not the cause of the floods.
Available environmental assessment reports on the highway do say that the elevated roads could cause obstruction of water flows downstream but also add proper drainage systems have been built in.
There are concerns that the Port City, near the capital Colombo, could create similar problems. This involves large scale land reclamation south of the Colombo harbour and the construction of a new financial district. Coastal communities fear that the one-billion-dollar investment by China Harbour Engineering Company will lead to coastal erosion and harm fish populations. Further inland people worry about growing air pollution and traffic. With 95% of the work on the 2.3 square kilometre reclamation area complete, coastal communities and others now have to wait and see if those fears will come true.
The environmental impact assessment report by the Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau states that they do not foresee “any significant changes to the shoreline”.
Communities left in the dark
Iddamalgodda says that communities are worried about coastal erosion, landslide threats, noise and air pollution. Environmental assessment reports indicate that the sand requirement for the reclamation is 65 million cubic metres supplied from two sites while a total of 3.5 million cubic metres of rock is also earmarked. But the biggest cause for concern is the lack of information and public consultations.
“People were kept in the dark and no reliable information of this massive project was in the public domain. The agreement between the Sri Lankan authorities and the Chinese company has never been made public. There has been no consultation either with so- called local beneficiaries of this project or with the critics,” said Iddamalgodda.
The Port City land reclamation site off Colombo. Photo Credit: Amantha PereraVimalabudhi agreed that he found it next to impossible to get information on the projects other than what government officials were telling him verbally.
In 2015 when the then Mahinda Rajapaksa government was defeated in national elections, the new government said it would reevaluate the progress of Chinese projects. The Port City construction was halted from early 2015 till mid-2016 but recommenced after the Chinese investors and the new government reached an agreement on landholding.
Government changes in Colombo are unlikely to alter China’s influence. When President Maithripala Sirisena sacked his Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe and appointed Mahinda Rajapaksa instead on October 26, one of the first visitors to meet Wickremasinghe and Rajapaksa separately was the Chinese envoy to Sri Lanka.
Back in Beragama, the plaque unveiled at the inauguration of the investment zone has been overrun by shrubs, but the villagers are still nervous. In early October, rumours spread through the village that government officials would pay a return visit to survey their lands.
Some of them gathered again at Vimalabudhi’s temple to plan another protest. The monk informed them these were just rumours.
“But when will we know if our lands will be safe from a takeover? Probably never, as long as the port and the airport is here, our lands are under threat,” he said.
A medic carries Ahmad Yasir Sabri Abid, 4, after the child was wounded during protests east of Khan Younis on 7 December. The child died from his injuries four days later.
Gaza’s health ministry has announced the death of the youngest person yet to be killed during Great March of Return protests.
Ahmad Yasir Sabri Abid, 4 years and 8 months old, died on Tuesday from injuries sustained the previous Friday during protests in Khan Younis, southern Gaza.
Ahmad Yasser Sabri Abu Abed, 4, was in his fathers arms at 3:30 pm local time when Israeli forces opened fire on protestors in Khan Younis, Gaza, on December 7. Ahmad was hit with bullet fragments and sustained injuries to his head, chest and abdomen. He died on December 12.
A senior health ministry official told The Times of Israel that the boy “was hit by bullet shrapnel in the face, chest and stomach at a protest” as a result of Israeli fire.
Some 180 Palestinians have been shot dead and nearly 6,000 others injured by live fire during Great March of Return protests along Gaza’s eastern and northern perimeter since 30 March. Nearly three dozen of those killed were children.
Palestinian child fatalities due to Israeli fire have spiked in 2018, with more than 50 killed in the West Bank and Gaza Strip – one death per week on average.
Ahmad Abid’s is the first Great March of Return death in a month, as protest fatalities in Gaza decrease and deadly encounters between Israelis and Palestinians rise in the West Bank.
West Bank killings
Israeli forces shot and killed Omar Hassan al-Awawdeh, 27, in Idhna village near the West Bank city of Hebron on Tuesday.
No Israeli forces were injured during the incident.
The family of Omar Hassan al-Awawdeh mourn during the 27-year-old’s funeral after he was shot and killed by Israeli forces earlier in the day on 11 December.
Wisam HashlamounAPA images
Israeli media reported that forces were in the village standing guard as the Civil Administration, part of the bureaucratic arm of the military occupation, “were taking part in an effort to crack down on the illegal burning of garbage.”
Al-Awawdeh is the second Palestinian killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank so far this month.
Israeli soldiers shot Muhammad Habali, a 22-year-old with cognitive and physical disabilities, in the head from behind at a distance of 80 meters during a raid on the city of Tulkarm on 4 December.
Video recordings and eyewitness testimony contradict Israel’s claims that Habali was killed during a “violent disturbance of the peace” by “dozens of Palestinians … throwing stones.”
The Israeli rights group B’Tselem obtained footage from multiple security cameras showing the “area was perfectly quiet and that there were no clashes there with soldiers” in the moments before Habali was shot:
“Quite the contrary” to Israel’s claims, according to B’Tselem, “the soldiers are seen walking unhurriedly, the Palestinians are seen talking amongst themselves, and then the soldiers fatally shoot Habali in the head from a considerable distance. The lethal shooting was not preceded by a warning, was not justified and constitutes a violation of the law.”
Another resident of Tulkarm was shot in the leg.
The soldiers did not provide either men with medical assistance, according to B’Tselem.
Ramallah raids
Israeli forces launched massive raids in Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank, on Monday and Tuesday:
Lawyers say British officials indicated willingness to 'engage in covert operations outside the rule of law' and 'turn a blind eye to torture' Tony Blair (L) and Muammar Gaddafi take a walk on the outskirts of Tripoli in March 2004 (AFP)
LONDON - A group of Libyan men were subjected to systematic abuse, curfews, and wrongful imprisonment, and threatened with deportation, as a result of years of secret collusion between Britain’s security and intelligence agencies – MI5 and MI6 – and the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, the high court in London heard on Wednesday.
In a blistering attack, Tom de la Mare, counsel for the Libyans, described British and Libyan intelligence agencies as being “partners in crime in unlawful and extremely shady behaviour” and a persistent refusal to come clean on their close cooperation despite mounting evidence in the media and earlier court hearings.
Allegations against 18 men – five of whom were named in high court papers on Monday – were based on claims provided to MI5 and MI6 by Libya’s intelligence agencies at a time the British government led by then-prime minister Tony Blair was developing a close and potentially lucrative relationship with Gaddafi.
They are seeking admission of guilt by the British government and compensation for false imprisonment, pending, in a number of cases, deportion.
Some of the allegations against them are believed to have been the result of information extracted from Abdul-Hakim Belhaj, a Libyan dissident who was secretly rendered to Tripoli in 2004 in a joint MI6/CIA operation, during interrogations in which he was tortured.
Evidence of the abduction, and that of another Libyan, Sami al-Saadi, emerged in the offices of Gaddafi’s intelligence chief, Moussa Koussa, after it was destroyed in a NATO air strike in 2011 during the uprising that led to Gaddafi's fall from power and eventual killing.
Documents revealed that British intelligence officers sent more than 1,600 questions to be put to Belhaj and Saadi, leading members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) despite having reason to suspect they were being tortured.
The documents show that in 2006 Libyan intelligence agents were invited to operate with MI5 on British soil where they worked alongside MI5 and allegedly intimidated a number of opponents of Gaddafi who had been granted asylum in the UK.
After years of denial, the British government in May admitted its role and apologised to Belhaj and his wife, Fatima Boudchar, for what it described as their “harrowing ordeal”.
The government did not accept any liability. Prime Minister Theresa May described what happened to them as “deeply troubling”, while the attorney general, Jeremy Wright, told MPs that “system changes need to be made and behavioural and cultural changes need to take place”.
'Staggering' collusion
What de la Mare called the “truly staggering scale” of the collusion between the British and Libyan security and intelligence agencies was subsequently revealed by the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee in a report into the UK's role in the CIA rendition and torture programme in the years after the 9/11 al-Qaeda attacks in the US.
The committee reported: “We have found 232 cases where UK personnel continued to supply questions or intelligence to liaison services after they knew or suspected mistreatment.
"In a further 22 cases (MI6) or MI5 provided intelligence to enable a rendition operation to take place; and in 23 cases they failed to take action to prevent a rendition – including instances where there were opportunities to intervene and prevent the rendition of a British national or resident.
"There was no attempt to identify the risks involved. There was no understanding in [the government] of rendition and no clear policy - or even recognition of the need for one. The UK tolerated actions, and took others, that we regard as inexcusable.”
The high court in London heard on Monday that British government lawyers protected MI5 and MI6 by hiding behind special secret court hearings and that a former British home secretary, Charles Clarke had not been told about the rendition operations and the extent of British-Libyan intelligence cooperation when he agreed that Libyans in Britain should be seized and deported.
As part of what de la Mare called the developing “touchy feely” relationship between the UK and Gaddafi’s Libya, lawyers for the Libyans said British officials indicated to Gaddafi their willingness to “engage in covert operations outside the rule of law”, to “tolerate arbitrary detention of individuals seen as a national security threat”, to “turn a blind eye to the use of torture or at the very least to the real risk thereof’, and to “reap benefits from interrogation under torture”.
At the very time the British intelligence services were covertly involved in the Belhaj rendition, detention, and interrogation, the government was publicly seeking a memorandum of understanding (MoU) “whose purpose was to avoid the very conduct in which the UK was complicit... suggesting to a political leader like Colonel Gaddafi that the UK government was speaking with a forked tongue and that the MoU was a public relations exercise.”
Lawyers for the MI5 and MI6 intelligence services and British government ministers argued that measures against the Libyans were taken for reasons of “national security” and that the Belhaj rendition was “wholly immaterial” to the cases.
The five claimants on Wednesday's case were referred to as C1 to C5.
They are represented by the solicitors Gareth Peirce and Irene Nembhard. The hearing is continuing.
Thursday, 13 December 2018
We are living through fascinating times dominated by online conversations with offline taking backstage. From the Arab spring to Yellow vests in France, the online has proven its potential and power – be it destructive or constructive!
A reading on the wall of a Japanese research Institute fascinated me – The fruits of your research are proportional to the number of your conversations with others. I heard from one Sri Lankan research student in Switzerland about his supervisor’s advice – Go and find food! Meaning seek places where seminars and workshops are held and get engaged with them – ensure that you spent some time listening and in discussion.
His metaphor is ‘find food’ as food is usually available in such settings and then strike conversations and network with other researchers and do not think that only listening only to your topic is the thing to do. The message was clearly identifying the value of conversations.
It is known that Steve Jobs really wanted his staff to interact – very much internally though as Apple was notoriously secretive – and have meaningful conversations and that he wanted to extend that to even when visiting washrooms. The story says that he failed to get that final design of the washrooms in the centre approved by his fellow staff! However, the rest of his planned conversation uppers all came into being with offices overlooking the cafeteria, etc.
Conversations that go beyond conversations
It is important to have conversations that go beyond conversations. While this may not be for all situations, we experience many conversations that should have meaningful structures yet are lacking in such.
A meeting degenerating into just verbal exchanges or carried out in a lacklustre manner only to suit the nominal agenda is unlikely to result in any rich exchange of ideas and overall elevation of knowledge.
Brooks and Jones recently writing to the Harvard Business Review had indicated that questioning a vital part of a conversation is a powerful tool for unlocking value in organisations. Its ability to spur learning and the exchange of ideas and in fuelling innovation and performance improvement had been highlighted. So many possibilities from a mere question in a conversation.
It reminds me of continuous opportunity losses from our experiences every day. For those who value idle chatter anything goes and these idles are not of any value to such people. Ordinary banter rules in Sri Lanka and we spend too much time and energy in impression management.
Coffee and conversation
An interesting story was once narrated by Steven Johnson the author of ‘Where Good Ideas Came From – the Natural History of Innovation,’ on how the United Kingdom transformed as a result of a coffee house. His presentation is also available as a TED talk and is quite fascinating.
It is known that going back to 16-17th century UK was not really flushing down their faecal matter down the toilet but had those accumulating below their home floors. The contamination of water with sewage and resultant cholera epidemics in Great Britain had been well documented.
People apparently fearing to drink water had recourse to taking alcohol instead and alcohol had become the preferred beverage of choice – morning, lunch and dinner and at more less all times. The fermented drink providing safety at the expense of sanity. He identifies the public becoming quite used to taking depressants and going through the day and alcoholic drinks were the depressants. It is perhaps has to be understood that the good old British of the day must have been perpetually drunk! I wonder whether we really consider or agree alcohol as a depressant considering our unique positioning of alcohol consumption as a global per capita figure.
As per Steven Johnson the appearance of the Grand Café in 1650 in UK’s Oxford city has had a significant transformative effect. This has appeared in the main street of Oxford in the heart of University of Oxford and is considered to be the first coffee house in UK.
Hot coffee has changed the nature of conversations and this in turn apparently has led to significant changes. Of course today the coffee has given way to coffee and tea. The availability of coffee had meant the drink is microbiologically safe – the boiling in coffee making helps.
Coffee is a stimulant, unlike alcohol, which is a depressant. When you gather around a table and have this drink, the nature of conversations appear to have changed. The subjects chosen had been issues faced and the discussions had been focused on solutions and means of achievement. A direction had been placed on all conversations. Ideas appeared to have flowed and creativity had blossomed and Oxford had led the change – well the coffeehouses in fact!
When people respond with ideas and take charge for their actions in a constructive way a lot can happen. Positive change had appeared and we witness United Kingdom heralding the first Industrial Revolution in 1711 with the advent of the modified steam engine by James Watt.
The essence of Steven’s assessment – the English coffeehouse had been crucial to the development and spread of one of the great intellectual flowerings of the last 500 years what has been termed as the enlightenment. So much from a cup of coffee and a conversation!
Coffeehouses with their architecture of space had really resulted in diverse groups of people engaging in highly stimulated discussions. History has indeed recorded for UK that many an innovation having a coffeehouse somewhere in their genesis.
Fast forward to days after Sputnik and another similar coffee conversation yielded the GPS (Global Positioning System) concept with idea becoming a reality three months later. In a visit to Cambridge I listened to a trend with the current undergraduates – the pub-crawls with beer are changing to coffee drinking! Steven Johnson really presents this Grand Café – which still awaits you down the main street of Oxford perhaps as one of the world’s oldest coffee houses – as being pivotal in UK’s innovative transformation.
We sell tea and drink spirits!
Coffee and tea had made society sharper and alert from a state of near stupor! When one reads a narrative of that type, it is unavoidable that one compares such a scene with the present and in our context. We sell tea and drink spirits!
I remember one main reason given for biofuels such as bioethanol not becoming a fuel in Sri Lanka – we must satisfy the internal demand for drinking first. Considering the way things are happening, we may have to wait for a long time.
Imagine the coffee house scenario with our kopi kade dramatisation. With or without alcohol, we appear to thrive on gossip or on the trivial. We crave going back in time as ‘Good Old Times’ are golden! We plan much less for the period in which we have to live.
If a bottle appears on a table, before a group disperses the bottle has to be empty and not the head filled with ideas. The meticulous planning is for the gathering, the subsequent direction usually left to the process of cognitive decline. It is your misfortune that if you miss such a gathering as you will be one of the centres of discussion.
Today it is interesting to observe that almost all becoming constitutional experts and no one really with all those vocal representations could make and iota of difference and only a solid waste of time personally will result. It is questionable the watering holes that are springing up across towns and cities really have a positive effect on our society when compared with coffeehouses of UK.
It is a real pity that we do not have researchers like Allison and John of Harvard, Todd Rogers of Kennedy school of business who research on conversations and identify how one should change. In the absence of real research, one way of comparing to reality may be through the scripts of teledramas that permeate our airwaves and YouTube and then those clearly shows that nothing positive emanates out for uplifting the society.
Steven Johnson has really presented a story from which we can take many a lesson. With tea in our midst and perhaps even more of a better drink than coffee, we appear to be getting enriched with ignorance day by day. It is time for us to sip a green tea and engage in a meaningful conversation! It is even more of a necessity to construct spaces to come together for innovation.
Palestinian media released images of the Israeli commando unit discovered in Gaza. Israel’s military censor has banned Israeli media from showing these images.
The Electronic Intifada was forced by Twitter to delete a tweet linking to a story that has been subject to Israeli military censorship.
In recent days, other publications and individuals have faced the same demand, indicating that the social media firm has agreed to become an enforcement arm for Israel’s efforts to control information about potential war crimes and abuses of Palestinian rights.
It is another ominous sign of how monopolistic Silicon Valley corporations – especially Facebook and Google – that control what are in effect the public commons are colluding with governments to reassert control of information previously lost due to the freedom provided by the internet.
On Sunday, The Electronic Intifada was ordered by Twitter to delete a tweet linking to a story about Israel’s commando raid into Gaza last month that was foiled by the resistance group Hamas.
Like other media and individuals reporting on this story that was subject to Israeli military censorship, The Electronic Intifada is now apparently facing direct censorship by @Twitter. We were forced to remove this tweet.
Seven Hamas fighters and one Israeli officer were killed after Palestinians confronted the raiding party, and the Israeli incursion provoked days of intense violence that teetered on the brink of full-scale war.
Days after foiling the Israeli raid, Hamas published photos from recovered identity documents it said were of the Israelis who took part in the attack.
The Israelis had reportedly entered Gaza disguised as humanitarian workers – potentially a war crime.
The Israeli military censor then issued a “rare statement in which it asked not to publish the information distributed by Hamas,” according to the newspaper Haaretz.
Israeli media, subject to mandatory censorship, have only published the photos with the faces of the suspected Israeli agents blurred out.
But other media not subject to Israeli censorship, including The Electronic Intifada, published the photos or circulated them on social media.
Twitter then began its campaign to suppress the images – almost certainly at the behest of Israel.
In its notice to The Electronic Intifada, Twitter asserted that The Electronic Intifada’s tweet violated the “Twitter Rules” but provided no specific explanation of how it did so.
The Electronic Intifada had no intention of violating any rules, but like other outlets, was simply reporting news as free and independent media are supposed to do.
The Palestinian outlet Quds News Network had its account temporarily locked by Twitter after publishing what it called “reports on the botched Israeli clandestine operation” in Gaza.
We have come here to let them know that change is coming whether they like it or not.
by Greta Thunberg-Dec 12, 2018
Footage: UNFCCC, Videographer Justin K. Davey
For 25 years countless of people have stood in front of the United Nations climate conferences, asking our nation’s leaders to stop the emissions. But, clearly, this has not worked since the emissions just continue to rise.
So I will not ask them anything.
Instead, I will ask the media to start treating the crisis as a crisis.
Instead, I will ask the people around the world to realize that our political leaders have failed us.
Because we are facing an existential threat and there is no time to continue down this road of madness.
Rich countries like Sweden need to start reducing emissions by at least 15% every year to reach the 2 degree warming target. You would think the media and everyone of our leaders would be talking about nothing else — but no one ever even mentions it.
Nor does hardly anyone ever talk about that we are in the midst of the sixth mass extinction, with up to 200 species going extinct every single day.
Furthermore, does no one ever speak about the aspect ofequity clearly stated everywhere in the Paris agreement, which is absolutelynecessary to make it work on a global scale. That means that rich countrieslike mine need to get down to zero emissions, within 6–12 years with today’semission speed, so that people in poorer countries can heighten their standardof living by building some of the infrastructures that we have already built.Such as hospitals, electricity and clean drinking water.
Because how can we expect countries like India, Colombia or Nigeria to care about the climate crisis if we, who already have everything, don’t care even a second about our actual commitments to the Paris agreement?
So when school started in August this year I sat myself down on the ground outside the Swedish parliament. I school striked for the climate.
Some people say that I should be in school instead. Some people say that I should study to become a climate scientist so that I can ”solve the climate crisis”. But the climate crisis has already been solved. We already have all the facts and solutions.
And why should I be studying for a future that soon may be no more, when no one is doing anything to save that future? And what is the point of learning facts when the most important facts clearly mean nothing to our society?
Today we use 100 million barrels of oil every single day. There are no politics to change that. There are no rules to keep that oil in the ground.
So we can’t save the world by playing by the rules. Because the rules have to be changed.
So we have not come here to beg the world leaders to care for our future. They have ignored us in the past and they will ignore us again.
We have come here to let them know that change is coming whether they like it or not. The people will rise to the challenge. And since our leaders are behaving like children, we will have to take the responsibility they should have taken long ago.
The above text is written by Greta Thunberg. It is published with Greta Thunberg’s approval.