Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, November 17, 2018

Rival Sri Lankan lawmakers exchanging blows in Parliament in Colombo on Thursday.CreditCreditLahiru Harshana/Associated Press
By Dharisha Bastians and Jeffrey Gettleman-Nov. 15, 2018

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — When the parliamentary speaker tried to call a vote, several lawmakers heckled him, and a gang of them swarmed the podium and broke his microphone. Someone threw a garbage bin at him. Then a bound copy of the Sri Lankan Constitution soared through the air.
Fists swung wildly. Several lawmakers were injured. The speaker, Karu Jayasuriya, 78, had to be hurried out a back door and the session canceled. Several members of Parliament were left dabbing their wounds with tissue paper.
But the chaos on the floor of Sri Lanka’s Parliament on Thursday may have finally focused the deeply divided government. For the first time since a constitutional crisis erupted last month, pitting the president against his own prime minister, the two sides are meeting.
Lawmakers in Colombo, the seaside capital, said Thursday night that they had talked to the president, trying to find a way to break the deadlock.
“We expect proceedings to be conducted in a more respectful manner tomorrow,” Rajavarothiam Sampanthan, an opposition lawmaker, said Thursday night.
For several weeks now, Sri Lanka’s government has been cast into confusion. It’s not even clear who is prime minister.
In late October, the president, Maithripala Sirisena, abruptly sacked the prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, calling him inept and corrupt.
The president then appointed a new prime minister: Mahinda Rajapaksa, a former president who is considered something of a strongman. When lawmakers balked at this, the president simply dissolved the Parliament.
But the tide has turned in the past few days. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued an interim order vacating the president’s sacking of the Parliament.

On Wednesday, when the parliament reconvened, a majority of lawmakers passed a no-confidence vote in Mr. Rajapaksa, which, according to Sri Lankan constitutional experts, means he is no longer prime minister.
This Indian Ocean island nation of 22 million people, known for its tasty tea and plentiful coconuts, is seen as a prize by both India and China. India had a friendly relationship with Sri Lanka for years, but recently China has invested heavily in the country and lent the island money that it is struggling to pay back.
The Rajapaksa family is considered the most powerful on the island. Mr. Rajapaksa was an authoritarian president, criticized for stifling dissent and accused of war crimes at the end of Sri Lanka’s civil war, which he brought to a decisive close in 2009. Several of his brothers have served in high levels of government.
On Thursday, it was his supporters who attacked the speaker of Parliament, trying to block a vote that would have expressed disapproval with a speech Mr. Rajapaksa had just made, in which he called for fresh elections.
Sri Lankan lawmakers have brawled many times before. But this was the first time, many said, that the speaker had been assaulted.
Mr. Wickremesinghe still claims he is the rightful prime minister. Both Mr. Rajapaksa and Mr. Sirisena have said they didn’t accept the no-confidence motion against Mr. Rajapaksa, claiming that the speaker had no right to call such a vote or that he did it in the wrong way.
On Thursday night, a lawmaker allied to Mr. Sirisena said the president would accept a new no-confidence vote, if it were done properly.

Western ambassadors, who have joined the crowds in the parliament gallery over the past several days, have asked all sides to work out a political settlement in line with Sri Lankan law.
Dharisha Bastians reported from Colombo and Jeffrey Gettleman from New Delhi, India.
A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: Melee Erupts In Parliament Of Sri Lanka. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe


Democracy Hijacked; By Whom?

Raj Gonsalkorale
logoThe political impasse continues in Sri Lanka, and the country has virtually come to a halt. The economy, which was in a perilous state before the dismissal of Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, very likely would have worsened now. The rupee continues to slide and price of goods are rising in line with the rupe depreciation. 
So, while Sri Lanka is burning, metaphorically, our Nero’s are fiddling.
For the good of the future generations of the country, it is time all Nero’s took a step back and took stock of the damage they are doing to the country by their fiddling.
It is time President Sirisena, Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa, Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe, and Mr Sampanthan by whatever titles they wish to call themselves, and Speaker Mr Karu Jayasuriya sat together along with other party leaders, and worked out a solution to the political impasse in the country and stopped the bleeding that is going on now.
The dismissal of Mr Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister has not been challenged in the only forum where it can and should be, the Supreme Court of the country. This gives one the impression that this act was constitutional or those affected believed it was so. This is just a logical view and not a constitutional view as Mr Wickremesinghe himself, as the injured party, should have challenged this Presidential decision in the Supreme Court if he thought it was not constitutional.
The following clauses in the 19th Amendment to the Constitution appears to confirm that the Presidential decision was constitutional
46 (2) The Prime Minister shall continue to hold office throughout the period during which the Cabinet of Ministers continues to function under the provisions of the Constitution 
46 (4) Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph (1) of this Article, where the recognized political party or the independent group which obtains highest number of seats in Parliament forms a National Government, the number of Ministers in the Cabinet of Ministers, the number of Ministers who are not Cabinet of Ministers and the number of Deputy Ministers shall be determined by Parliament. 
(5) For the purpose of paragraph (4), National Government means, a Government formed by the recognized political party or the independent group which obtains the highest number of seats in Parliament together with the other recognized political parties or the independent groups. 
46 (2) seems to state that if a cabinet of ministers’ cease to function, then the Prime Minister ceases to hold office
The Sri Lankan Parliament approved the formation of a National Government on the 4th of September 2015 after the UPFA led by the SLFP and the UNF led by the UNP signed an MOU. So in effect, until the UPFA withdrew from the MOU on the 26th of October 2018, a National government existed in the country. Correspondingly, the National government ceased to exist once one party to the two party MOU withdrew from the MOU. Logical?
If there is no government, one cannot have a cabinet. Logical?
And, as per clause 46 (2) the Prime Minister ceases to hold office if there is no cabinet. Again, logical?
Then the President has to appoint a new Prime Minister and ask him/her to form a cabinet, and hence a new government
The President did so as per clause 42 (2) and appointed Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa as the new Prime Minister. 
42 (4) The President shall appoint as Prime Minister the Member of Parliament, who, in the President’s opinion, is most likely to command the confidence of Parliament
This clause has been badly worded as it does not specifically and unambiguously require the Prime Minister so appointed, to seek a vote of confidence in the Parliament. The words “Presidents opinion”, “most likely” are neither here nor there and the onus is on those opposed to the Prime Minister and the government to move a vote of no confidence consistent with Parliamentary procedures and practices. There is no ambiguity about exercising this option.
In the current situation, the President has taken a stand that the vote of no confidence on Prime Minister Rajapaksa has not been done in conformity with standard Parliamentary procedures and practices.

Read More

Friday, November 16, 2018

Jaffna uni students protest in solidarity with estate workers struggle


 Home14 November 2018
Students at the University of Jaffna held protests in solidarity with Malayaga Tamils in their struggle to achieve a 1000 rupee minimum wage on tea estates.
A protest was held by students at the main campus in Thirunelveli on Tuesday, and earlier in the month by students at the traditional medicine faculty in Kaithady.

Tragic Day in Sri Lanka

The leaders who tolerate and allow such conduct must be ashamed of themselves


by Imthiaz Bakeer Markar-
( November 17, 2018, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Yesterday will be recorded as a tragic day in the history of Sri Lanka. Today would be a day on which the sentiments and feelings of all those who love their mother nation, irrespective of colour and party, were wounded
Yesterday would be a day on which all Sri Lankan people were humiliated and degraded
Some Members of Parliament, appointed to represent you and I within a democratic structure have degraded your vote through their conduct.
We cast our votes and send them to Parliament so that they can, as our representatives, work tirelessly for the development of the country and the wellbeing of us and our children.
However, their extremely poor and inappropriate conduct has made it humiliating to even refer to them as our representatives.
The leaders who tolerate and allow such conduct must be ashamed of themselves.
We commend and appreciate the People’s representatives who conducted themselves in a patient and modest manner during this tense and extreme circumstance.
The citizens witness these hurtful incidents with concern and patience
Our country is the oldest democratic nation in Asia. The people of a civilized democracy appoint members of Parliament as their representatives as it is impossible for the people to come together at every instance of decision making.
Is this the manner in which they who were appointed for decision making on our behalf, conduct themselves? Aren’t they, through such conduct, insulting us, who appointed them? Aren’t we being degraded?
The assaults – physical and verbal, directed at the greatly respected Honourable Speaker of Parliament, who was not only a former officer of the Army but also a senior citizen, is exceedingly humiliating.
There are many lessons we can learn from this tragic day to be marked in history.
It is only the general public, who can prevent events of this nature. It is only the general public, who can state that such conduct is viewed with extreme disgust. It is also the general public, who can urge that our vote and democracy be respected. It is only the general public, who can state that they stop humiliating us within and outside our country. It is only the general public, who can urge them to conduct themselves with a sense of decency for the sake us and our children.
The public is you. It is you who can act to prevent the occurrence of another similar event such as today.

Touring the killing fields

A foreign delegation of military students pose with their families by a Sri Lankan military ‘victory’ monument in Puthukudiyiruppu, one of the heaviest shelled towns which saw thousands of Tamil deaths.
 Home16 November 2018
The Sri Lankan armed forces announced that it had taken a delegation of foreign military students and their families on a tour of the North-east, where they visited different army bases and were told by the military of how the region was recaptured.
The delegation of students visited Jaffna, Kilinochchi and Mullaitivu, some of the sites of the massive final offensive launched by the Sri Lankan military. Tens of thousands of Tamils were killed during those final stages of the war, with hospitals repeatedly shelled, surrendering Tamils executed and reports of sexual violence committed by troops.
Not a single member of the Sri Lankan armed forces has been held accountable for the crimes committed, with Sri Lankan repeatedly stalling on moves for accountability.
Nevertheless, the military took the visitors “sight-seeing within the Jaffna Peninsula” and to a Sri Lankan “Victory” monument in Puthukudiyiruppu, the site of some of the most intense military shelling. Several such monuments have appeared across the North-East, with local Tamils complaining that such constructions serve to further Sinhala triumphalism.
The military also delivered a lecture to the delegation on the ‘Recapture of Kilinochchi & Reconciliation Process’.
The Sri Lankan military did not comment on which nations the student officers had come from, but confirmed that they were undertaking a course at the Sapugaskanda Defence Services Command and Staff College.
Despite almost 10 years passing since the end of the armed conflict, the deaths of tens of thousands of Tamils remain unaccounted for and the military continues to occupy large swathes of land across the North-East.

Why The Young Cannot Be Absolved

Uditha Devapriya
logoFor obvious reasons, the world doesn’t revolve the way most of us would want it. The rise of fringe movements that have taken on the Establishment, the apathy of Third Way centrism that was a cover for neo-conservatism and neo-liberalism, the rejection of conventional politics by the young, and the embracement of bigotry, sexism, and populism by the old (in the West) are all signs of an impending tragedy. What’s worse is that the narratives being spun to the people, for the most, are failing. Perhaps that’s why the US midterm elections didn’t play up to the hype that political pundits played along to. There was no blue wave, and even though the Democrats won several key governorships and control of the House of Representatives, the Republicans swept into the Senate with a clear majority, winning key swing states.
It would be rash to blame one party, or ideology, for the imbroglio this has resulted in. You can add, multiply, subtract, and divide, but whichever way you look, the truth is painfully obvious: it’s not the world we once knew. What’s true for the world is true for this country too. It’s not the country I used to know.
Part of the reason for that, I think, is the way the young react to political parties and political infighting in general. It doesn’t take a theorist to figure out that, no matter what the party, no one has really stood for the interests of the teenage, adolescent, and early adult demographic (between 18 and 24). Their indifference towards political movements stems, not from anger, but from disappointment: it cost the Democrats in 2016, when, shocked at the defeat of Bernie Sanders and upset at Hillary Clinton’s at times self-contradictory stances, they came down: 60 percent of the 18-24 year old segment had voted for Obama in 2008; for Clinton the turnout was, by contrast, 55 percent. Resentment can be tough.
As a former member of this segment (I turned 25 the day the US midterm elections were held), I can attest and even relate to the contempt with which those who belong to it treat conventional politicians. There was a glimmer of hope in 2015 when Ranil Wickremesinghe and his cohorts took over the parliament. For the first time in many years, a woman took over the Ministry of Women and Child Affairs; for the first time ever, a woman took oaths as Mayor of Colombo; for the first time also, many of the members of the Cabinet actively struck a chord with the young.
And it wasn’t just those promises of free Wi-Fi and free laptops and free tabs that endeared these politicos to them (in any case, we don’t have the statistics relating to how many of them voted for Maithripala Sirisena and the UNP). It was the idea of legislators actively taking into account their views, opinions, even prejudices. When a young man I know well, who supports Mahinda Rajapaksa, told me that he had no respect for Anagarika Dharmapala because of his chauvinism, I realised that these were views, opinions, and prejudices that transcended simplistic political dichotomies. These youngsters were hard to understand.
I know there are those who supported Ranil Wickremesinghe because of his school tie and elitist credentials (the school clique he institutionalised was one of many reasons why his campaign failed), but even those from this segment who were batting for him were focusing on younger blood: on Harsha de Silva, Eran Wickramaratne, Harshana Rajakaruna, and more than anyone else, Buddika Pathirana. If Mahinda Rajapaksa managed to conjure an image of himself as a baby-carrying populist who was in touch with the people, these parliamentarians conjured an opposite image: those who made it evident for us that politicians need not always carry those babies.
The need of the hour, in 2015, was a set of parliamentarians who could convince us that there needed to be a shift in the polity from the Executive to the Legislature. A crucial part of the campaign for this shift stemmed from the belief that the country needed meritocrats like Harsha and Eran. They were the face of the UNP.
For a while, this worked. From the UPFA I could think of only one politician constantly in touch with the young, and that was Ramesh Pathirana. But when Pathirana posted on Facebook the figures for AIDS patients in India and Sri Lanka and how the situation here would worsen if the ETCA deal was struck, he raised flak from the medical community for his serophobia. It was difficult to imagine Harsha and Eran indulging in that kind of below-the-belt mudslinging. It still is, because they are from a different calibre: while their cosmopolitanism can be squared with the UNP, if tomorrow a campaign for democracy is launched against the party leadership, for legitimate reasons, they would join in, just as Athulathmudali and Dissanayake joined in the movement against Ranasinghe Premadasa.

Read More

Mannar mass grave excavation temporarily suspended

Home

14 November 2018
Excavation of the Mannar mass grave, where over 230 skeletons have been unearthed so far, has been temporarily suspended.
The excavation activities, which had been taking place for over 100 days, have been suspended due to officers having to undertake official court duties, Colombo Page reports, and will resume again on November 27.
So far, 235 skeletons have been unearthed from the mass grave, with at least 18 believed to be of children.
The remains are being held at a special chamber in the Mannar Court Complex. Though samples of the remains were supposedly due to be sent to a laboratory in the United States for carbon dating, the decision to send them lies with Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Justice. The ministry is yet to reply, and is only expected to respond in December.
There has also been controversy over the announcement in August by the Office of Missing Persons (OMP) that the office would fund the excavation, with concerns being raised about the independence of the office.

The fish that swallowed the whale


logoFriday, 16 November 2018

This is an easy-peasy, elementary effort of an ordinary citizen to comprehend the mad scramble for power among the political class.

It is undertaken in the belief that the crisis we face is an opportunity to reject the family kleptocracy of Mahinda Rajapaksa and the corporatist kleptocracy of Ranil Wickremesinghe.

We must treat President Maithripala Sirisena kindly. We the people promoted the man beyond his capacity. For three years we were either complicit in or were indifferent to the quiet build-up of a pseudo presidential persona that depicted him as staggeringly successful beyond his worth.

Any person with a cursory understanding of the Freudian theory of personality – that of id, ego and super ego will forgive him for his present day penchant to exude an atrocious arrogance that far exceeds his achievements.
Silver lining
There is a silver lining in all this madness. A silent, substantial and sane segment of our polity now realise the stockpile of wisdom contained in the rhetoric used by Dr. N.M. Perera to warn us on the inherent peril of the executive presidency. ‘What if a mad man becomes the president?’

That NM’s virologist nephew Tissa Vitharana has been bitten by the loony virus is a subject for another day.

We often make the mistake of interpreting the polarisation of a few and select power groups or political parties as reflecting a great polarisation of society as a whole.

For example, Mahinda does not represent Sinhala Buddhist opinion. He has most of the Sangha in his wallet. We confuse the two.

Mahinda gave diplomatic passports to prominent Buddhist monks. For the life of me, I do not understand why Buddhist prelates need privileged passports to preach the Dhamma either here or abroad.

The positive side of the current madness is that there is a discernible polarisation of forces between the modern and the tribal. The principled stand of political formations representing ethnic minority interests with enlightened democratic segments of the ethnic majority is a sign that at long last the seeds of a true post-colonial nation state are taking root in the fertile soil of freedom and human dignity.

Let us go back to 8 January 2015. The rainbow coalition had a simple objective. It rejected a state that was a kleptocracy and a state that sanctioned murder, abductions and disappearances. More than the kleptocracy part, the fear and excesses of the deep state transcended all other societal fault lines communal, economic and ethnic.  The successor state that was installed by the good governance enthusiasts did not sanction murder, abductions and disappearances.

But the kleptocracy remained intact. It was far too entrenched. The successors were far too greedy to make the structural reforms that would make a difference. The story of SriLankan Airlines, the bond boondoggle, and legal gymnastics of two President’s Counsel in the Ranil Wickremesinghe Cabinet to stall the probe on Avant-Garde bounty hunters are eloquent examples of the double dealings of the reformers.

In the past three years, State-sanctioned murders have not been conclusively resolved. The parents of the eleven youth who vanished while in the custody of the navy are hoping for closure in vain. The Admiral who shielded one of the prime suspects dressed in his grandiose white is exuberantly celebrating his proprietorial grip on the allegiance of a peasant mind incapable of discerning the thin line separating perfidy and patriotism.

That said, this worrisome situation should not make us sceptics about democracy. The outcry, the tangible consensus against these problems as mentioned above and not mentioned due to space tell us that that there is indeed something about democracy that is worth mobilising for.

At this moment of democratic peril, we must resolve to reinvent and expand our democracy.
Chaos in Parliament is chaos that we created
We don’t need to elect buffoons who after elections pander to the whims and ideocracies of ‘Mahanayakes’ cocooned in their tribal enclaves.

The purported Minister of Buddha Sasana according to today’s news reports has agreed with the prelate of Asgiriya monastery that we must not allow foreigners to interfere in our affairs. May be Gammanpila wants the Australian investor to remain mum on his charge of stock market swindle.

Our democracy begins and ends with the nebulous notion of an electoral representative democracy. It relies on quite valuable but extremely brittle set of institutions, which cling on to the notion that the elected Political class somehow know better than their electors.

The elected parliamentarians and in this instance our elected president does not seem to have much faith in the citizens’ capacity to make political decisions.

The challenge we confront is simple and straight forward. We must somehow survive this crisis and form a credible caretaker government and hold a general election in which we the people can decide on representatives who will offer alternative practices enabling genuine democratic participation.

The great war hero is exposed in all the nakedness of a cat burglar stealthily stealing the expressed will of the people. Caught with the goods, he has now turned witness for the prosecution and wants a general election.

Thanks to the President’s puerile and precipitate action we have an opportunity to rethink and reframe our idea of democracy.
We must abandon this monstrous model
There is no way we can restructure it. We must at the next general election, put forward a constitutional model that does not promise but guarantees equality, freedom and the space for ordinary citizens to have a meaningful influence on politics. We must reject both, neo liberal economics and free market economics. Markers need intervention by the state. There is nothing vulgar about State Owned Enterprises, provided the vulgar are kept out of management.

It is an urgent and immediate task. I live in Battaramulla. Every day I pass the edifice that houses the Ministry of Megapolis Development now taken over by the charlatan son of Philip Gunewardene, father of the revolution that never arrived.

I must make an effort to avoid a monstrous billboard with an obscene picture of Dinesh Gunewardene and call for the Boralugoda lion roar.

The task of rethinking our democracy is pressing. We are now witnessing the brazen, arrogant and aggressive attempt by a gang that openly attempted to hijack the Parliament to take command and control of the ‘language of democracy’ to capture power and restore their rent seeking ministerial privileges.

They involve ‘The People’ to subvert opposition to their machinations. The recent capture of State media institutions demonstrate their capacity to offer more undemocratic solutions to real and imagined problems. They seek to divide our society on parochial lines and undermine the climate of reconciliation that was clumsily but determinedly pursued in the last three years.

You must remember how Mahinda Rajapaksa set up the family business.

Mahinda Rajapaksa is not a selfish man. He institutionalised the exploitative privileges and perks of his team from base to the top of the pyramid. Despite his great charisma, this episode has made him a political clown. He has paid a high price. He has lost all political legitimacy. This is the beginning of the end of the Mahinda Rajapaksa folk legend.

Now we must focus on our President whom we elected as the common candidate.

His humility and his humble life trajectory were his USP – ‘the unique selling proposition,’ the term used by professional marketeers in marketing FMCG – Fast-Moving Consumer Goods – the stuff that has a limited shelf life.

In fairness we must remember that he was proud of his achievement or destiny. At some point he concluded that he himself singlehandedly reached the hybrid of an Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Mandela. That is beside the point.

He certainly has a deep-seated antagonism towards Ranil Wickremesinghe, the UNP Leader, who paved way for him to become president. The problem is that halfway through they both got confused. The President stopped being grateful. His Prime Minister never ceased crying over his spilt presidential milk.

When the President complains about the cultural chasm between him and the Prime Minister, my conscience dictates me to agree with him.

First, Ranil Wickremesinghe does not speak the Sinhala that Maithripala Sirisena speaks. Second, no matter how humble you are, there is a limit to tolerating the uppity know all attitude of Ranil Wickremesinghe. It is not an act that is human possible unless your fate, interest or wellbeing is dependent on the UNP Executive Committee.

Since defeating the no confidence motion against him, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe did not bother to mend fences. Newspapers periodically reported that the President got mad over some Cabinet paper or other.

In high pressure politics, getting mad over something is not unusual. Staying mad with somebody with whom you have fundamental differences is also not unusual. Getting mad is no big deal. Going actually, really and truly mad is catastrophically insane.

House disrupted again

JO alleges Speaker acted in violation of ‘agreement’


article_image
Opposition members shouting at government MPs. (Pix by Kamal Bogoda)

By Ajith Alahakoon, Akitha Perera and Shamindra Ferdinando- 

Yesterday’s parliamentary proceedings disrupted by the governing Joint Opposition (JO) due to the failure of party leaders to reach a consensus on the agenda despite an understanding by major political parties on Thursday as regards resumption of parliamentary sittings. President Maithripala Sirisena met senior representatives of the UNP, the TNA, the JVP et al and Prime Minister Rajapaksa separately.

President Sirisena called for a vote on a fresh no-confidence motion (NCM) on PM Rajapaksa in a proper manner. He wanted an amended version of the motion, presented last Wednesday (Nov 14), to be submitted. But, the Opposition sought again to take a vote on the original NCM after having suspended Standing Orders in an exercise similar to the last Wednesday’s.

JO Puttalam District MP Arundika Fernando sat on Speaker Karu Jayasuriya Chair before the commencement of the sittings. Surrounded by JO colleagues, Fernando taunted UNP and JVP members for over 30 minutes. Around 2.05 pm, Jayasuriya, surrounded by a group of unarmed police personnel

made an abortive bid to reach the Speaker’s chair. The Sergeant-at-arms Narendra Mihindukumar Fernando, carrying the mace, followed the Speaker. However, JO lawmakers thwarted their attempt while the Speaker’s chair was taken away. An MP also grabbed a chair that was being used as an improvised shield by a police officer.

JO members threw books and various other objects at Jayasuriya, his police guard as well as UNP, JVP and TNA members who remained seated and refrained from responding to the JO challenge.

During yesterday’s incidents in parliament, President Sirisena’s Office issued a statement that the parliament wouldn’t be prorogued under any circumstances.

A JO MP threw some liquid which Opposition MP Gamini Jayawickrena Perera (UNP) and Vijitha Herath alleged contained chillie powder.

Earlier in the day, the party leaders failed to reach a consensus on the agenda in the wake of Speaker Jajasuriya not heeding government representatives’ call for tangible action against those MPs who had brought into the chamber what JO members called sharp objects.

Having failed to evict the JO group from the Speaker’s podium, Jayasuriya conducted called for vote on fresh NCM and declared it was passed by voice vote. Last Wednesday’s vote too was passed by voice vote according to the Speaker.

The Sergeant at Arms carrying the mace stood next to the Speaker surrounded by police officers.

Immediately after UNP, JVP, TNA MPs raised their hands to approve the fresh NCM; the Speaker left the chamber, while JO lawmakers threw various objects at them.

The police refrained from responding to MPs throughout the confrontation.

The parliament was adjourned till 10 am on Nov 19.

Following the conclusion of day’s short proceedings, JVP MP Vijitha Herath alleged that the JO deliberately caused the disruption to prevent seven among its group voting for the NCM. Herath said that he was doused with water containing chillie powder and hit with a copy of the Constitution.

The JVP group in parliament consists of six members.

Addressing the media later, TNA Chief R. Sampanthan insisted that PM Rajapaksa should have proven his majority in parliament without causing chaos.

Trincomalee District MP Sampanthan said that President Sirisena named Mahinda Rajapaksa PM as he believed Rajapaksa had the majority in parliament. The veteran politician said that Rajapaksa should have faced the NCM.

The TNA parliamentary group comprises 15 in the wake of one lawmaker pledging allegiance to Sirisena-Rajapaksa combine.

Both the TNA and JVP have pledged support to the UNP parliamentary group comprising106, including the Speaker plus one who contested on the SLMC ticket.

Heeded the voice of the majority - Speaker

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya’s letter to President Maithripala Sirisena in response to the letter sent by the President.

Friday, November 16, 2018

Your Excellency,

I acknowledge the receipt of the letter dated 14.11.2018 addressed to me by you. It is obvious that the resolution passed by 122 Members of Parliament yesterday (14.11.2018) has been challenged by you.
Those 122 Members of Parliament included Members of Parliament of the United National Party, Sri Lanka Freedom Party, Tamil National Alliance and Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna and a few Members of Parliament and Ministers of the new government.

It is regretting that you have forgotten that you ascended to the post of President and Hon. Ranil Wickramasinghe to the post of Prime Minister on 8th January 2015 upon the mandate of the people given thence.

I consider it my duty to remind to you that I went around the country with you addressing over 140 public rallies in order to seek a mandate from the people to make you the President and Hon.Ranil Wickramasinghe the Prime Minister. I also wish to remind to you that conferring the Premiership occurred on the agreement of everybody in the then government.

On this particular occasion, the change of premiership was not effected with such concurrence or having regard for the majority of Parliament.

I wish to thank you for reminding me the responsibility of acting independently as the Speaker. It is the stand of the democratic, civilized society that standing up for 122 Members of Parliament is heeding the voice of the majority which should not be construed as being biased.

After assuming duties as the Speaker I can, true to my conscience, state that I have not stepped in to Sirikotha, the headquarters of the United National Party. Further, I have not participated, even at a minor level, in any political activity of the party.

I wish to remind you that allegations were preferred against me by the ruling party members led by the United National Party for allocating more time for the Members of Parliament of the Opposition and it was also suggested that I should be replaced as the Speaker.

I was astonished by comments made by you as a seasoned parliamentarian and a matured representative of people which referred to the way I conducted affairs in Parliament yesterday as being inconsistent with the Constitution, the Standing Orders and the parliamentary traditions.
The Ministers of the new government, having realized that they do not have the capability of demonstrating the majority of Parliament, gathered at the well of the House denigrating democratic and parliamentary traditions with absolute disregard for the Standing Orders, hurling most vituperative and abusive words while trying to grab the mace was a far cry from the term “Honourable” Members of Parliament. By watching the compact discs of the proceedings of the House yesterday, you may well be able to understand how some Members of Parliament deliberately tried to prevent a vote by their ugly conduct.

I also wish to state with responsibility that all 122 Members of Parliament who voted for the motion were present at the House yesterday. Amongst them were some Ministers and Members of Parliament of the government. Though I made a respectful request thrice appealing for their support to duly take the vote, I was not given any opportunity for taking such a vote and accordingly, in terms of the Standing Order 47(1) I had to take the vote by voices and declare that it had been passed by the majority.

Your Excellency,
The country has plunged into a serious disorder owing to the decision taken by you on the 26th of October. The economy of the country, living conditions of the people, arrival of tourists, the goodwill earned by Sri Lanka at the international arena and the reputation you earned during your long political career are in the process of rapidly diminishing at the moment. An unnecessary conflict between the executive and the legislature has been created as a result.

It is with great respect that I urge you on behalf of all the citizens of the country and the future generations to come, that expeditious measures be taken to save the nation from this catastrophe by lending your ears to the majority view of Parliament without further delay.

I will send you a response explaining the constitutional perspective and the other matters stated in your letter, after having obtained the instructions of the legal experts.

Although we had an appointment today at 8.30 a.m. it is the opinion of the party leaders that such a meeting would serve no purpose, given the attitudes that are explicit in your letter.

In conclusion, it is with a patriotic gesture that I emphasize the fact that, I firmly believe that this dilemma can be unraveled through negotiations , for the sake of the august good governance objectives for which we all appear for and as a state which possess a legacy of matured democracy throughout seven decades.

Arrangements will be made to release this letter to media, since your letter too had been released thus.

Thank you, Yours Sincerely,

Karu Jayasuriya, Speaker