Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, November 3, 2018

Fearing "angry mob", lawyer of freed Christian woman leaves Pakistan

Supporters of Muslim Student Organisation (MSO) chant slogans during a protest after the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy against Islam, in Islamabad, Pakistan November 2, 2018. REUTERS/Faisal Mahmood/File Photo


Saad SayeedAsif Shahzad-NOVEMBER 3, 2018

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - The Pakistani lawyer who helped a Christian woman overturn her death sentence for blasphemy said on Saturday he had left the country in fear of his life after her acquittal earlier this week sparked street protests by Islamists.

Leaders of the ultra-Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik (TLP) group blocked main roads in Pakistan’s biggest cites for three days, calling for the murder of the Supreme Court judges who acquitted Asia Bibi on Wednesday — urging their cooks and servants to kill them.

Saiful Mulook had kept a low profile during the years he represented Bibi, a mother-of-five who has been on death row since 2010, due to the highly sensitive nature of the case. Two politicians who had tried to help her have been assassinated.

Mulook told Reuters in a WhatsApp message he had gone abroad “just to save (my) life from angry mob” and because of fears for the safety of his family.

“I consulted and everybody is of this opinion (that I should leave),” he said, adding that he would return to the country to continue his work on the case if he was given protection by security forces.

The TLP called off the protests late on Friday after striking a deal with the government that would see authorities seek to put Bibi on an ‘exit control list’ barring her from leaving the country.

Bibi’s whereabouts are unknown, but Islamists have warned the authorities against taking her out of the country.

“There will be a war if they send Asia out of country,” TLP leader Khadim Hussain Rizvi said after the deal was reached.

Earlier in the week one of Rizvi’s deputies called for Pakistan’s Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and two other judges who ruled in the case to be murdered.

“Whoever, who has got any access to them, kill them before the evening,” TLP co-founder Muhammad Afzal Qadri told supporters.

The TLP was founded out of a movement supporting a bodyguard who assassinated Punjab provincial governor Salman Taseer after he spoke in Bibi’s defence in 2011. Federal minister for minorities Shahbaz Bhatti was also killed after calling for her release.

Bibi was convicted of blasphemy in 2010 for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Islam after neighbours objected to her drinking water from their glass because she was not Muslim. She always denied having committed blasphemy.

The case has outraged Christians worldwide and been a source of division within Pakistan, where Islamist parties such as the TLP have framed Bibi’s release as Pakistan’s government caving into Western demands.

Bibi’s acquittal is being reviewed, though it is extremely rare for a review to overturn a Supreme Court ruling.

Jewish refugee aid group in Pittsburgh undeterred by synagogue shooting


Before attack, alleged shooter fumed in anti-Semitic social media rant against Jewish non-profit that helps resettle refugees

Rebecca Remson, left, and Leslie Aizenman in Pittsburgh JFCS offices (MEE/AliHarb)

Ali Harb's picture
PITTSBURGH, United States - Leslie Aizenman, director of refugee and immigrant services at a Pittsburgh Jewish humanitarian agency says that last week's synagogue massacre targeted everything that she and her group represent.
"We are a Jewish-serving agency. Many of us are Jewish. We live here. I belong to that synagogue, and then it's my life's work," she said. "So, I couldn't even comprehend."
Still, the tragedy will not stop Aizenman and her colleagues from continuing their work at Jewish Family and Community Services (JFCS), a few blocks away from the Tree of Life Congregation where one week ago a gunman took the lives of 11 worshippers.
Before the attack, the alleged shooter had fumed in an anti-Semitic social media rant against the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), a Jewish non-profit that helps resettle refugees."HIAS likes to bring invaders in that kill our people," he wrote.
JFCS works with HIAS to provide a host of services to help resettle refugees in Pittsburgh.
With the anti-refugee sentiment added to the alleged shooter's anti-Semitic motives, the attack felt personal for Aizenman and JFCS.
I'm not going to stop… There's some fear, but we're more committed.
-Leslie Aizenman, JFCS
"We're the ones working with HIAS; we're the ones doing the work," Aizenman told MEE.
She said the shooting has caused her some emotional turmoil, but added: "I wanted to be here; I'm not going to let it stop me."
JFCS, through HIAS, works with refugees from around the world from the time they arrive in the US.
"We welcome them at the airport. We will have already prepared an apartment for them with basic furnishing. Then we bring them to their new home, and then we connect them to many different services," Aizenman said.
Further assistance includes setting up doctor appointments, helping children enrol in school, English classes and employment programmes. Moreover, JFCS uses interpreters to help newcomers access existing services available to the broader public.
"Even before this, there were a lot of people who didn't like what we're doing. I'm used to that," Aizenman said. "I've spent a lot of time talking to local residents about who refugees are and educating them because there is a lot of fear."
Still, the shooting was a whole new level of xenophobia.
"I'm not going to stop… There's some fear, but we're more committed," Aizenman said.
Memorial for victims outside Tree of Life Synagogue (MEE/Ali Harb)
Rebecca Remson, director of development and communications at JFCS, called for spreading the truth to combat ignorance about refugees and those who help them.
"We need to share more. We need to get the word out more… that all this work is really wonderful. It's good for our city. It's good for our culture. It's good for society," she said. "We need to educate people."
Besides refugee resettlement and immigrant assistance, JFCS provides many social and humanitarian services to the local community.
Only half of the organisation's client's are Jewish, according to Remson.
Aizenman said that arriving refugees may not be fully aware of the hostility towards newcomers.
"I'm hearing more from people who have been here longer... They're much more scared," she said.

HIAS: Tragedy does not 'lessens our resolve'

HIAS says it is guided by Jewish values in standing for a "world in which refugees find welcome, safety, and freedom."
The organisation, one of nine nonprofits that work directly with the US government as a part of the refugee resettlement programme, was founded in 1881 to assist Jewish refugees. In 1975, it partnered with the State Department to help resettle people from all around the globe.
Much like its local partners in Pittsburgh, HIAS expressed resilience after the synagogue massacre.
"We’ll get through this, but there’s no denying that this is a devastating moment," Melanie Nezer, HIAS’s senior vice president for public affairs, said in a statement.
"But I don’t think it lessens our resolve. If anything, it makes us feel more strongly that we need to stand up for what’s right."
Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers addresses people outside the synagogue (MEE/Ali Harb)
President Donald Trump has made criticising the admission of refugees and immigrants into the US a focal point in his political rationale.
"If I win, they're going back," he said in 2015 as a candidate, pledging to deport Syrian refugees if he was elected president.
While Trump has not sent refugees back, he did block Syrians from entering the US as a part of his "Muslim ban" executive order.
The administration has also drastically slashed the number of refugees coming into the US from around the world. The US has accepted 22,000 refugees this year, down from 85,000 in 2016, Barack Obama's last year in office.
Speaking to worshippers who gathered at a neighbouring synagogue, Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers said in his sermon on Saturday that he warned Trump against hate speech when the president visited Pittsburgh on Tuesday.
"I said to him, 'Mr President, hate speech leads to hateful actions. Hate speech leads to what happened in my sanctuary.'"

Here’s why New Zealand is beating Australia when it comes to Pacific workers


By  | 
FOR EVERY 1,000 backpackers picking fruit and vegetables in New Zealand, there are about 3,000 seasonal workers from the Pacific.
In Australia, the mix is completely different. For every 1,000 backpackers there are only about 250 Pacific seasonal workers.
The Australian outcome is what the research literature predicts. The ‘crowding out’ hypothesis asserts that unregulated migrant labour will crowd out regulated options. Employers here prefer the more flexible, much less regulated backpacker (formally known as Working Holiday Makers).
It’s less hassle, and as recent media and academic research has shown, easier to get away with underpaying backpackers, where no government approval or reporting is required, than with seasonal workers, where stringent approval and reporting requirements are imposed.
How then to explain New Zealand’s contrary performance? That’s what we set out to do in our new Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies paper “Pacific seasonal workers: Learning from the contrasting temporary migration outcomes in Australian and New Zealand horticulture.”
We came up with five factors which explain why, as the table below shows, New Zealand’s 2007 seasonal worker scheme (called the RSE or Recognised Seasonal Employer) has been much more popular than Australia’s 2009 Seasonal Worker Program (SWP).
Seasonal-workers-in-New-Zealand-and-Australia
First, New Zealand’s horticultural sector has a much stronger export orientation. As a result, the sector is more focused on quality and compliance, as stories of worker exploitation risk the loss of export markets.
In 2012, there were 1,516 New Zealand agricultural producers accredited to the European Global Gap code of practice, but only 153 in Australia. The code covers, among other things, the treatment of workers, and is independently audited.
In contrast, Australian farmers are producing mainly for the domestic market, with little external scrutiny of workplace conditions and employee rights. They are focused primarily on costs rather than reputation.
Second, collective action is easier in New Zealand. New Zealand’s horticultural sector is much better organised than in Australia, and has a single peak body. It played a leading role in developing the RSE, and employs someone to promote it.
In Australia, due perhaps to greater geographical dispersion and product fragmentation, there are multiple state and product organisations, and the SWP has been left mainly to the government to develop, run and promote.
Third, the costs of regulatory compliance are also lower in New Zealand. Australia’s minimum wage is significantly higher than New Zealand’s, which creates a stronger incentive to avoid it.
Australia also has a weaker enforcement regime, making it less likely that you’ll be caught if you cheat. This is again due to the tyranny of size, but also because Australia has put less effort into developing a licensing regime for labour hire companies. This situation is now changing, which explains the growth of the SWP in recent years (as noted below).
Fourth, while Australia’s and New Zealand’s backpacker and seasonal worker schemes are very similar, there are subtle differences in their design, history and implementation, which have made a difference.
shutterstock_1120774508
Backpacker living accommodation while working farm jobs at Silver Link, Ayr, Queensland, Australia. Source: saruntorn chotchitima/Shutterstock
New Zealand introduced the RSE in 2007. At the time, Australia wasn’t prepared to follow suit. Instead, in response to farmers’ complaints about labour shortages, it introduced the second-year backpacker visa to funnel backpackers into agriculture in their first year with the offer of a second-year visa.
This proved to be a very strong incentive. It led to a large increase in the number of backpackers working on farms. This, in turn, ended the horticultural labour shortage, and reduced the incentive to use seasonal workers when they became available from 2009.
New Zealand only introduced a backpacker visa extension in 2009, after the RSE had been bedded down, and it gave a much weaker incentive to work on a farm: the extension was only for three months (not 12 as in Australia) and it only allowed further farm work during that period (the Australian extension involves no work restrictions).
Finally, there is the simple fact that Australia simply attracts far more backpackers than New Zealand, making the potential pool of backpacker farm labour that much larger. In the 2017-18 financial year, Australia had 210,000 backpackers while New Zealand had only 70,000.
Conversely, New Zealand has a larger Pacific diaspora, which may have facilitated greater uptake of the RSE by Pacific Islanders (though this does not explain Vanuatu’s participation, given the country’s small diaspora in New Zealand).
All of these factors explain why New Zealand’s RSE has left Australia’s SWP behind. But, interestingly, the analysis also helps explain the recent rapid growth in the SWP.
A domestic backlash against exploitation of backpackers here in Australia is starting to lead to greater efforts to regulate the sector. Supermarkets are at last asking growers to demonstrate good treatment of workers, a growers’ representative body is promoting a Fair Farms accreditation process and state governments are starting to license labour-hire companies. These changes, which are occurring as the agricultural sector faces reported labour shortages, favour regulated options such as the SWP.
In absolute numbers, backpackers employed in horticulture will continue to leave seasonal workers far behind in Australia. But the New Zealand experience shows that such ‘crowding out’ is not inevitable. There are benefits as well as costs to using a labour source that is more regulated and less easily exploited.
This piece was first published at Policy Forum, Asia and the Pacific’s platform for public policy analysis and opinion. 

Glowing chemical 'could aid brain cancer surgery'


The fluorescent chemical seen in the brain
The chemical causes tumours to glow pink under UV light

A chemical that makes brain tumours glow pink could help surgeons to remove the cancer safely, a trial suggests.
Scientists gave people with suspected glioma a drink containing 5-ALA, a substance known to accumulate in fast-growing cancer cells.
The pink glow the chemical causes was found in people with the most aggressive cancers.
Researchers hope it will make it easier for surgeons to distinguish between cancer cells and healthy brain tissue.
Treatment for glioma, the most common form of brain cancer and the one that killed ex-Labour cabinet minister Dame Tessa Jowell, usually involves surgery to remove as much of the cancer as possible, and the prognosis for patients is often poor.
For this new trial, 99 patients with suspected high-grade (fast-growing) gliomas were given a drink containing 5-ALA before surgery.
Research has previously shown that 5-ALA ends up in fast-growing cancer cells, because they lack an enzyme needed to break down the chemical.
Surgeons used microscopes to help them look for fluorescent tissue while removing tumours from the patients' brains.
During their operations, surgeons reported seeing fluorescence in 85 patients.
Of these, 81 were confirmed by pathologists to have high-grade disease, one was found to have low-grade disease and three could not be assessed.
In the 14 patients in whom surgeons did not see any fluorescence, seven tumours were found to be low-grade gliomas while the other seven could not be assessed.
Study author Dr Kathreena Kurian, associate professor in brain tumour research at the University of Bristol, said: "There's an urgent need to have something while the patient is on the table, while the neurosurgeon is operating, which will guide them to find the worst bits.
"The beauty of 5-ALA is that they can see where high-grade glioma is, while they're operating."
Tessa Jowell
Dame Tessa Jowell died in May this year

The researchers caution that the study looked at patients who were already suspected to have high-grade tumours, and a larger study in which more patients have low-grade disease would provide more information on the use of this technique.
Other types of markers may need to be tested for detecting low-grade glioma cells, they say.
Next steps could include testing the 5-ALA in children with brain tumours, or to help surgeons distinguish between tumour tissue and scar tissue in adult patients, whose brain cancers have recurred following treatment.
Dr Paul Brennan, from Cancer Research UK, said: "Highlighting the more aggressive tumour cells in real-time could help doctors achieve the delicate balance between removing as much of the tumour as possible while preserving surrounding healthy tissue.
"The fluorescent marker may also ease the burden of follow-up treatment, as cancer cells left behind after surgery require additional radiotherapy or chemotherapy."
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approved the use of 5-ALA for patients with brain tumours, prior to surgery, earlier this year.
The research is being presented at the 2018 NCRI Cancer Conference in Glasgow from 4 to 6 November.

Friday, November 2, 2018

Sri Lankan navy threatens resettled family in Mullikulam

A Tamil family in Mullikulam, Mannar who recently resettled into their lands, were threatened by officers from the Sri Lankan navy on October 30. 
Home02Nov 2018
The family were in the process of installing a fence to their land, which was released from occupation by the security forces, when navy officers arrived at the scene and stated the land belongs to them. 
The officers took photographs of the family and forcibly removed the fence construction, the local vicar, Lawrence Leo told reporters. 
The incident comes just days after the return of the war crimes accused former president, Mahinda Rajapaksa to the political scene following his appointment to the role of prime minister. 

SRI LANKA JOURNALISTS CAUGHT IN POWER STRUGGLE: RSF



Sri Lanka Brief01/11/2018

Sri Lanka’s journalists have become caught in the centre of the bitter power struggle between the country’s rival prime ministers, an international media watchdog said Wednesday, urging authorities to ensure their safety.

Reporters without Borders (RSF) said supporters of former president Mahinda Rajapakse stormed state-owned media institutions shortly after he was controversially named prime minister on Friday.
Sacked prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has refused to hand over power however, saying the move was illegal.

 “The violence with which Mahinda Rajapakse’s bully boys took over the state media is absolutely unacceptable,” said an RSF statement.

“We call on all parties to act responsibly by guaranteeing journalists’ safety and by respecting their editorial independence, so that impartial news coverage is available to the public.”

RSF said that minutes after Rajapakse was sworn in, his Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) party activists “invaded the newsrooms of various state media”.

“They took control of the two public service TV channels, Rupavahini and ITN, the radio stations that are part of the Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation, and the Lake House press group,” it added.
RSF said the SLPP activists “forced journalists at the Daily News and the Lake House group’s two leading weeklies, Silumina and Sunday Observer, to change the front pages of their next issues”.

Journalists said that in general state media has become pro-Rajapakse while private networks have kept up coverage of Wickremesinghe and his party.

– ‘Darkest hours’ –

RSF said the constitutional crisis recalled the “darkest hours of the Rajapakse presidency between 2005 and 2015,” when he lost an election to current president Maithripala Sirisena.

During Rajapakse’s tenure, 17 journalists and media workers were killed, according to rights organisations.

In 2015, Wickremesinghe helped Sirisena to defeat Rajapakse and formed a unity government, but the two have drifted apart over policy and personality clashes.

Tens of thousands of Wickremesinghe supporters blocked roads in Colombo on Tuesday, stepping up a showdown with Rajapakse.

Official sources said parliament speaker Karu Jayasuriya was to meet with the president on Wednesday to try to convince him to end a suspension of parliament so that deputies can vote on which prime minister they back.

Sirisena suspended parliament on Saturday to forestall any attempt by Wickremesinghe to prove he has a majority among the 225 lawmakers. Jayasuriya has warned the crisis could lead to a “bloodbath” on the streets if the assembly does not hold a vote soon.

Behind the scenes, the rivals are seeking to tempt lawmakers to defect to bolster their numbers if a vote is held.

Rajapakse, 72, has given five legislators from Wickremesinghe’s party ministerial portfolios in his cabinet after persuading them to change sides.

Wickremesinghe has convinced at least two lawmakers from Sirisena’s camp to join his United National Party.

Following the latest defections, Wickremesinghe has 104 MPs in the 225-seat chamber while Rajapakse and Sirisena together have 99. A majority of the 22 remaining MPs are expected to back Wickremesinghe in any vote, observers said.

© 2018 AFP

Bribery Accusations Deepen Turmoil in Sri Lanka

Lawmakers during a meeting on Friday in which a majority signaled support for the ousted prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe.CreditCreditEranga Jayawardena/Associated Press

By Dharisha Bastians and Jeffrey Gettleman-Nov. 2, 2018

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — Sri Lanka’s politics plunged into deeper turmoil on Friday when a majority of the country’s parliamentarians refused to recognize the appointment of the new prime minister amid rising tensions and accusations of millions of dollars in bribes.

Last week, President Maithripala Sirisena unexpectedly fired Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, accusing him of being inflexible and corrupt, and replaced him with Mahinda Rajapaksa, a former president who is considered by many to be the strongman of Sri Lankan politics. Human rights investigators have accused Mr. Rajapaksa of war crimes dating to the country’s civil war.

Since last week both Mr. Rajapaksa and Mr. Wickremesinghe have claimed to hold power, setting off a constitutional crisis in this island nation, a popular tourist destination and a major producer of tea and coconuts.

While Mr. Rajapaksa has been meeting with foreign diplomats and making the rounds of government offices in the seaside capital, Colombo, Mr. Wickremesinghe has been holed up in the stately prime minister’s residence, Temple Trees. Hundreds of his supporters are standing guard outside, vowing to protect him.

Some lawmakers backing Mr. Wickremesinghe say they have been offered bribes of over $2 million to switch their support to Mr. Rajapaksa. Mr. Rajapaksa’s son, Namal, posted a Twitter messagesaying his party had no information about bribes being offered and that any such accusations should be immediately investigated.

On Friday, 118 lawmakers, a majority in the 225-seat body, poured into a committee room in the Parliament building for a meeting with Speaker Karu Jayasuriya. The legislators signed a resolution asserting that Mr. Sirisena’s actions were “unconstitutional, illegal and null and void” and refused to “accept the appointment of Mahinda Rajapaksa as prime minister by the president and all other appointments subsequently made.”

“This constitutional coup is now over,’’ announced Karunarathna Paranawithana, a lawmaker in Mr. Wickremesinghe’s coalition. “The only way Rajapaksa can hold on to power now is through the use of thuggery or the military.”

Sri Lanka has had a rocky recent past. It recently emerged from an ethnically driven civil war that Mr. Rajapaksa brought to an end with aggressive tactics that human rights investigators say killed thousands of civilians.

It is unclear whether he will be able to ride out this turmoil and legitimize his position as prime minister.

Much hinges on when Parliament will officially convene. Mr. Wickremesinghe’s side wants Parliament to convene next week, but a spokesman for the new government said Parliament won’t meet again until Nov. 16.

Image-Mr. Wickremesinghe, center left, greeted supporters outside the prime minister’s residence in Colombo this week.CreditEranga Jayawardena/Associated Press

The longer the standoff continues, analysts said, the more it will help Mr. Rajapaksa, allowing him to use his copious resources and political skills to peel off lawmakers to his side. Five legislators from Mr. Wickremesinghe’s party have already defected to Mr. Rajapaksa and been granted cabinet posts.
Mr. Sirisena dismissed Mr. Wickremesinghe on Oct. 26 and named Mr. Rajapaksa to replace him. He then suspended Parliament, preventing a vote to determine which of the two could muster a majority and become leader.

The dispute took a deadly turn last weekend when government workers loyal to the president swarmed a minister who had been ousted with Mr. Wickremesinghe. The minister’s bodyguard opened fire, killing one person.

Friday’s meeting with Mr. Jayasuriya inside Parliament was the first real test of each leader’s support. Mr. Wickremesinghe, whose vote would have brought the tally to 119, did not attend the meeting.

“What President Sirisena has done is illegal and undemocratic,” said Rishad Bathiudeen, a Muslim lawmaker and leader of a party that has often played kingmaker in Sri Lankan coalitions. Mr. Bathiudeen and Rauff Hakeem, the leader of Sri Lanka’s largest Muslim party, control 13 seats whose members have decided to stand with Mr. Wickremesinghe.

Some lawmakers who support Mr. Rajapaksa have said privately that they are worried about gaining enough votes in Parliament, though others predicted Mr. Wickremesinghe would lose support in the coming days.

Thousands of Sri Lankans have taken to the streets to support Mr. Wickremesinghe and democratic governance. The demonstrations have so far been mostly peaceful, but Mr. Jayasuriya, the speaker, has warned of a “blood bath” if Parliament was not permitted to meet and end the constitutional crisis.

The accusations of attempted bribery have inflamed the situation. Palitha Range Bandara, a lawmaker from Mr. Wickremesinghe’s party, told Mr. Jayasuriya that he had been offered $2.8 million to defect to Mr. Rajapaksa’s party.

Mr. Bandara said he would file a complaint with Sri Lanka’s Bribery Commission and hand over electronic and documentary evidence.

Mr. Sirisena has helped Mr. Rajapaksa set up a cabinet of about 14 ministers, and the pair have taken steps to slash prices on consumer and essential goods in an effort to to shore up popular support.

Many Sri Lankans are upset with the government after sharp rises in the price of household goods in recent months, driven by the country’s growing debt and a weakening currency. A number of big infrastructure projects begun under Mr. Rajapaksa have failed to pay off.
 
Dharisha Bastians reported from Colombo, and Jeffrey Gettleman from Mumbai, India

Our road to unfreedom



logo Friday, 2 November 2018 

Now we know why Sirisena the President landed us on the straight single lane expressway to unfreedom. He will not stay even one hour in the presidency if Ranil is made prime minister again. So, says the news reports.

It is a damned good idea. We the people must redouble our efforts to make Ranil Wickremesinghe the prime minster just for one day. We will be spared the painful process of an impeachment and GROBR.

We can then replace Ranil with a new prime minster. That new prime minister must be a man or a woman who will not take us to either the oligarchic kleptocracy that we expelled on 8 January 2015 or to crony neoliberalism that thwarted our good governance agenda.

Malice and enmity at the top have led us to a constitutional wrangle.

Late Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike exasperated by the ‘pukka sahib’ swagger of Ranjan Wijeratne told the ex-planter turned national security czar, “You cannot run the country the way you ran the Demodara group.”

Well, the time has come to tell the President that he cannot resolve national political differences in the manner of a ‘Grama Sevaka’ who when piqued with one ‘Mudalali’ tells the people to shop in the other Mudalali’s kadey, forgetting how the other fellow fleeced them before 2015.

Ignorance is the counter thesis of intelligence. Nothing fosters ignorance more than one’s blinkered opinions or pure prejudice. Nothing strengthens short-sighted inappropriate actions more than malice aforethought.

Chandrika Kumaratunga
I know her detractors will hurl much abuse at me for saying this. I unhesitatingly admire the deep-down integrity and humanity of the former President Chandrika Kumaratunga.

She is a bad judge of people. She got us Sarath Silva, a Chief Justice who on his own admission removed the blindfolds of lady justice and fiddled with her weighing scales. Then she unleashed G.L. Pieris, the law professor, on us by making him a National List MP and a Minister. Since 1994 the man has been telling us how to bake cakes with pure unadulterated crap with icing of political expediency on top.

All that fades when we come to her prize discovery of the common candidate. Mind you. I don’t blame her. Good intentions pave many roads and most lead us to good places and only some end up in hell. I weep for her. Her father was assassinated. Now her trust has been assassinated and she is condemned to live with that mortal wound. History will be kind to her. I promise her that I will tell my grandchildren that she tried.

Mahinda Rajapaksa 
There are three losers in this crisis. The first is former President Mahinda Rajapaksa. All he had to do was to hold his immaculately white sarong for the ripe mango to fall into his lap.

Now his charismatic war-winning persona is totally irretrievably lost. No country beyond our shores has offered good wishes to the only leader who defeated terrorism, at least that is what the blurb writers claim, and sycophants proclaim.

Today, he is just another pedestrian politician who has either become prime minister through the backdoor or the political burglar caught in the act.

Ranil Wickremesinghe 
Ranil Wickremesinghe has been taught the lesson of his life. It was indeed a grand spectacle and a convincing display of public support for protecting and preserving democracy.

There were Mary and Clare, two vivacious lasses I knew 30 years ago, now buoyantly self-confident social activists holding up banners ‘We are not here for Ranil, We are here for democracy.’ There were thousands of others younger and older men and women who shared their sentiments cheering on the speakers. Of course the protest rally was organised. The crowd response was authentic, and the emotions were sincere.

Ranil has discovered that his handpicked UNP ex co is not the voice of either the people or the UNP. Ranil is a goner. I hope he comes out of this impasse regaining his premiership. He must then exit gracefully.

Some people believe holding on and hanging in there are signs of great strength. Real strength is knowing when to let it go. He cannot erase the hardened public perception of a failed neo liberal and a promoter of crony oligarchy.

This is an age where in, neo liberalism is an obscenity. This is also an age where ascendant nationalism has made even liberalism a dirty word.

Maithripala Sirisena
Many ask the question why the President chose the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to pull his chestnut out of the fire. Why not a MR proxy such as Dinesh or the indolently agreeable Chamal? Unfolding events will finally provide the answer. For the present it is obvious that his mind went back to the days of his coerced allegiance to the ‘Maharajano’. If protest had to be contained, he needed a proven ‘fear mechanism’.

The question we face is, will that work effectively in the digital age and 24x7 television? So far it has not. The mansion in Malwana has still not drawn a legal claimant. There is reason for hope.

With all the petrol in the world Mohamed Bin Salman after the murder in the consulate is fast becoming a Dust Bin Salman.

Murder of a parliamentary democracy will not go unnoticed. The cricketer is restoring democracy in Pakistan. Maldives has come to its senses. Monk Elle Gunawansa is pissed off that the European Union wants us to convene Parliament.
Sirisena the President has emerged as a strange unifier of the nation. All shades of public opinion, political, social, cultural and economic, have reached a consensus on what makes a political clown. The more discerning prefer the term sanctimonious comic. The street wise talk of the monkey given a razor.

Mahinda Samarasinghe
The new Government spokesman Mahinda Samarasinghe is a brazen-faced liar.

In his first press briefing he read out a purported email sent to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya by the Acting Attorney General. He claimed that the AG had declared the appointment of Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa “constitutionally legitimate”. He compounded the intended jiggery-pokery by telling journalists that it was privileged communication and could not release the document. Pity no journalist asked how the potbellied fraudster and a third party accessed the privileged communication between the AG and the Speaker.

Now we know better. The Attorney General as the principal law officer of the Government has not declared the President’s removal of a prime minister and the swearing in of a new prime minister to be constitutionally legitimate.

He does not say he has no opinion. He merely says that as the principal law officer of the Government it is a matter to be resolved by those who created the crisis.

I warn parents who plan to send their kids to La Trobe University in Australia in the next academic year. That is the place that Mahinda Samarasinghe claims he got his degree. I looked up the place in the internet of things. They don’t seem to have a faculty for con artists. All the same parents should double check.

What Mahinda Samarasinghe set out was a textbook neo fascist agenda. You manufacture a crisis. Then you grab the State media apparatus. You tame the private media into anticipatory obedience. We are witnessing it now.

After manufacturing the crisis, you distort facts in to a narrative and start manipulating the narrative and emotions of the public. They dismiss reality by suppressing facts.

We may or may not succeed in protecting our hard-earned freedoms. We may not prevent the return of despots today. But as a 76-year-old loony nut obsessed with human dignity and individual freedom I implore my compatriots to obliterate these mongrel intellectuals practicing politics of deception from public life.

May be my grandchildren will live under a transparent accountable democracy.

Honorable Speaker: Act Now & Act Fast

Arun Kumaresan – Air Vice Marshal (Ret’d)
logoThe events on Oct 26th, which has been termed as a “constitutional coup”, which came as a rude surprise to all who cherish democracy and believe in a public mandate that dictates the functions of the parliament; within the framework of the explicit provisions of our constitution, appropriate standing orders and conventions. These rules and conventions are deep rooted in our 70years of democratic traditions flowing from the “Westminster model”, which has been zealously protected by the HONOURABLE MEMBER who wore the cloak & held the Office of the SPEAKER.
The current act by the President who took the ‘Oath of Office’ to protect and uphold the constitution has created a controversy that suggests he has violated the solemn oath. This is further amplified as Hon’ble Attorney General (AG) was constrained from giving an opinion.  It goes without saying, if the act of the President was “constitutional”, AG would have made a call, which would have made your task much easier. It is of public knowledge that AG has advised on the same roughly four months ago, which prevented the President from taking a similar action as that of 26th of Oct and instead led to a “ NO Confidence Motion” against the sitting Prime Minister. What was unconstitutional then cannot become constitutional now.
Hon’ble Speaker as the custodian of the legislature, it is time for you to act to protect the people’s mandate in a functional democracy. The democracy in Sri Lanka now hangs in your mature wisdom. We do not want the current divisions of opinion to become a conflict and threaten the peaceful co existence. We also do not want coups & counter coups. We also do not want the Members of Parliament to become auction able entitles, similarly to the era of slavery; making the legislature an auction yard.
As per the media, it appears that your request to the President to convene the parliament has not materialized and even a MP couple of hours ago have suggested it as the 16th of November as originally planned. Hence Hon’ble Speaker, the ball is now in your court; ACT NOW & ACT FAST.
Summon a meeting in the presence of the leading members of the Clergy, Diplomatic corps. Civil society & party representative at the office of the speaker or at your official residence, as early as this Sunday (4th Nov) and give a ruling on the following:
1. Was the act appointing a Prime Minister by the President is constitutional?
2. Was the act by the President in proroguing the parliament followed the due protocol and conventions?  and,
3. Announce the date of convening the parliament under special circumstances to make your ruling in the floor of the house.
Whatever your determination becomes FINAL and it will resolve the confusion that is dividing the populace of Sri Lanka. In the event the act by the President is unconstitutional you may also make an announcement at this meeting that the status quo prior to 28th of Oct is legitimate to assist the public officers to act accordingly. 
This is not about UNP or SLFP nor Ranil Wickramasinge or Mahinda Rajapaksa. It is only about the constitutionality of actions, whether it is democratic or undemocratic.
Hon’ble Speaker – “ACT NOW & ACT FAST”. You will be remembered forever for protecting “DEMOCRACY” in Sri Lanka.

Read More