Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, September 27, 2018

MR CANNOT BE SLFP CHAIRMAN - Court

A lawsuit filed by two political activists seeking an order to re-instate former President Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Chairman of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) was yesterday dismissed by the Colombo Civil Appellate High Court.

Lakmal Sooriyagoda-Friday, September 28, 2018

The Colombo Civil Appellate High Court two-judge-Bench comprising Judge Manilal Waidyatilleke and D.N. Samarakoon decided to affirm the Colombo District Court’s judgment without a hearing into the matter.

On September 29, 2017, the Colombo District Court dismissed this lawsuit which sought an order to re-instate former President Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Chairman of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP).

However,the two plaintiffs had filed an appeal in the Colombo Civil Appellate High Court challenging Colombo District Court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit.

Former Colombo District Judge Sujeewa Nissanka had upheld the preliminary objections raised by defendants and decided to dismiss the lawsuit in limine.

This lawsuit had been filed by two Plaintiffs former Boralesgamuwa Urban Council Chairman K.D. Aruna Priyasantha and Asanka Nandana Srinath citing the SLFP General Secretary and the Election Commission Chairman as defendants.

The SLFP General Secretary through his counsel had raised preliminary objections citing that there is no legal basis to proceed with the case.

In his preliminary objections, the SLFP General Secretary stated that plaintiffs are indirectly challenging the acts of the current President of the Republic done in his capacity as chairman of the SLFP.

“It is common ground that the chairman of SLFP is the President of the Republic. In terms of Article 35(1) of the Constitution, the President of the Republic has immunity from suit except in an action filed in terms of Article 126 of the Constitution,” SLFP General Secretary added.

The defendants further submitted that the District Court has no jurisdiction to file action against the Elections Commissioner.

“The second defendant Anura Priyadarshana Yapa has resigned from his position as the General Secretary of SLFP and cannot be named as party defendant in this action. The caption of the action identified third defendant as Sunanda Deshapriya, the Election Commissioner. There is no person who can be reasonably identified as such and in fact no such person used to act as the Commissioner of Election’, SLFP General Secretary further added.

The SLFP General Secretary maintained that the plaintiffs are seeking to circumvent the provisions of immunity from suit accorded to the President of the Republic and as such the plaintiffs’ action is liable to be dismissed in limine.

The plaintiffs alleged that the former SLFP General Secretary Anura Priyadarshana Yapa had sent a letter to the EC on or around January 16, 2015 over the appointment of a new Chairman of the SLFP.

The plaintiffs further alleged that the Executive Committee of the Party without holding a proper committee meeting, had taken the decision to make new appointments to the SLFP leadership.

President’s Counsel Chandaka Jayasundara with counsel Pulasthi Rupasinghe and Lanka Dharmasiri appeared for SLFP General Secretary. Senior Counsel Nimal Weerakkody appeared for the plaintiffs.

Will Gods support paddy cultivation this Maha season?


Indications this year are that the weather gods are kind, will bring timely rainfall and favour paddy farmers for a bountiful Maha cultivation and harvest. But will our local gods occupying administrative seats postpone cultivation until irrigation tanks collect sufficient water? – Pic by Shehan Gunasekara

logo Thursday, 27 September 2018

Normally rains for Maha cultivation season arrive around 20 September and the Meteorological Department has been forecasting incoming rains. Its website informed on 13 Sepetmber Mahiyanganaya received 50mm of rain.

The Accuweather website, which gives more reliable long-term weather information, has been forecasting rains over the island during next week. Its website shows how rain-clouds approach Sri Lanka from the East and rains could be expected especially in the north-central and eastern parts of the country over the next few days or weeks.

Cultivation last season

Looking back at last cultivation (Yala) season, Paddy Marketing Board (PMB) announced that they will commence purchasing paddy from farmers from 4 August. Chairman of the Board, informed that they expect to purchase up to 120,000 metric tons of paddy during this Yala season and the Cabinet of Ministers has granted approval for funds. The Department of Agriculture believes that farmers will be able to reap a total harvest of 1.4million metric tonnes of paddy this season.

During August and early September media reported stories of farmers’ problems due to shortage of cultivation water and insect attacks on cultivated paddy. Agriculture officials were advising farmers to use particular varieties of pesticides.

When PMB commenced paddy purchases in early August, PMB would be expecting to purchase farmers’ paddy harvested during July end and later. Paddy takes three to four months from sowing to harvesting, with popular varieties requiring three and half months. Thus fields matured in end-July would have been sown in mid-April.

Going backwards given maximum six weeks to prepare fields, Maha cultivation would have been harvested in February end, meaning Maha cultivation commenced in mid-November, when rainy season was at peak. Very likely these farmers would have cultivated according to government instructions. The farmers that complained of water shortage and insect attacks in August and September would have cultivated still later. There seems to be a serious problem in cultivation times of paddy farmers.

Traditional paddy cultivation

Prior to Mahaweli diversion, paddy farmers traditionally depended on rains for cultivation. In the north, north-central and eastern provinces major part of the annual rains arrive during Maha season, also the main paddy cultivation season. They areresponsible for the bulk of Sri Lanka’s rice production. Some of these paddy lands were fed from minor irrigation tanks and still others are solely rain-fed.

Normally, Maha rains arrive around 20  September, which are normally heavy, a day’s rain exceeding 50mm. Prior to rains the fields are dry and hard, with field bunds damaged due to machinery running over during harvesting and transport. Rains soften the ground and after the first rain, farmers repair the damaged field bunds, second and third rains collect water in the fields and ploughing becomes possible, especially now considering the land preparation is mechanised. Thus, sowing of seed-paddy is possible in early October and paddy would be ready for harvesting by mid-January, now againwith a harvester. Historically, rain water collected in the tanks were reserved for Yala cultivation, but when rains are insufficient, deficiency replaced from tanks.

Thereafter, Yala cultivation could begin by mid-February and be harvested in May-end, mostly using water from reservoirs. Some farmers after the Yala harvest, assisted by minor rains in May and June fields are used for cultivation of vegetables, corn, maize and similar crops that require less water. These cultivations depend mostly on rain and for centuries the farmers used this method. Even today, some farmers continue cultivation on the same pattern and reap benefits.

Current practices

The above practice was popular decades ago, now irrigation water is supplied through major irrigation tanks administered by Government officials. Resulting bureaucrats and politicians decide on cultivation days, based on the ability to issue water for cultivation. Earlier local cultivation committees decided on cultivation days, especially when farmers were dependent on rain water or minor tanks not connected to major schemes.

Now most cultivations in North-Central and Eastern Provinces are fed with Mahaweli waters, in addition now Polonnaruwa tanks are supplemented with Moragahakanda waters. Cultivation instructions are centralised and are decided in meetings chaired by District Secretaries. Resulting, official commencement of cultivation depends on issue of water from reservoirs. Irrigation engineers could assure supply of cultivation water only when reservoirs have substantial water for immediate release, while expecting rains or canals bringing water supplementing the reservoir.

The Committee completely ignores the possibility of cultivation with the arrival of rains and delay the commencement of cultivation. Thus in some years cultivation starts only in November and some other farmers delay still further for their own reasons.

Results of delayed cultivation

With delayed cultivation, when heavy rains arrive in November/December rice plants are still young, become inundated and gets washed away. If seed paddy was sawn earlier, young plants would have reached nearly a foot height and would benefit from rains, with weeds get inundated and destroyed making weedicides unnecessary. By January rains would have ceased and dry weather assists drying of mature plants for harvesting. Late cultivation continue to need water are forced to depend of stored water from tanks, wasting precious water that could be used for next cultivation, Yala.

The staggered cultivation by different farmers, in addition to demanding excessive quantities of water, also results in a major problem, the insects. When all cultivations are together insects are few, but with staggered cultivation insects move from one field to another multiplying in numbers, the results were seen in August.

Saving precious water

During the planning stage of Mahaweli Development Project in late 1970s, World Bank officials pointed out that Sri Lankan rice farmers consume world’s highest quantum water for paddy cultivation and warned unless this consumption pattern is amended, the entire Mahaweli Project would become a failure.

The Japanese who carried out Moragahakanda planning in 1980s mentioned same and insisted 50% saving of water be necessary for optimum benefits of irrigation projects.

Moragahakanda waters to Polonnaruwa

The President released water from Moragahakanda reservoir, but according to Master Plan first users of Moragahakanda waters are beyond Yakalla, south of Anuradhapura. Upper Elahera Canal to carry water northwards from Moragahakanda tank is under construction and the completion expected only by 2024. Until such time water from Moragahakanda would only supplement waters for Polonnaruwa group of irrigation tanks and farmers there would have plenty of water irrespective of weather or part of the year, with the possibility of releasing water as demanded by farmers. The pattern would be sure to spoil the Polonnaruwa farmers, when Upper Elahera Canal is complete, Polonnaruwa farmers would no longer enjoy abundance of water and would be sure to protest.

Excess water have their problems too. Staggered cultivation with plenty of water would help multiplying insects attacking paddy fields. Also when some farmers are ready for harvesting do not require water. But others with growing paddy would require water, resulting in conflicts between farmers. Thus controlling cultivation times under cultivation committees as previously done is essential.

President’s 1,000 tanks project

The President inaugurated the 1,000 tanks project meant to renovate long-neglected small irrigation tanks mostly in North-Central Province. These minor tanks neglected over the centuries are filled with eroded soil over the years, also in most tanks bund sectionswere washed away needing repairs. Farmers in the tank renovation areas are highly pleased, with the hope able to cultivate paddy two crops a year.

Paddy is the most favoured crop among the farmers, where most aspects of cultivation is mechanised except for sowing of seed paddy, which allows the farmer to idle most of cultivation period while being assured of a sizeable income. With the renovation of a large number of small tanks and intensive cultivation of Polonnaruwa tanks, the country’s rice output would sure to exceed consumption. Current rice production is only marginally lower than the requirement, with production being affected by adverse weather.

Few years ago, with consecutiveseasons of good harvests, production exceeded consumption. The Government had to intervene purchasing excess stocks to prevent a price crash. But the rice was not exportable as the produce quality was not consistent. The Government was forced to dispose excess stocks as food aid through United Nations.

Farmers’ hopes

Every farmer wishes for a successful cultivation season. The primary requirement for such success is the proper supply of water; which depends on sufficient rainfall, correct quantities at proper times. Excessive rains could be more devastating than insufficient rainfall.

Current indications this year are that the rain gods seem to be kind and would ensure rains at the proper time, commencing around 20 September for the major paddy cultivation regions. Farmers continuing with the ancient traditional method would commence paddy cultivation with the first few rounds of rain. Afterwards is a low rain period with heavy rains expected in November/December. Dry weather commences from early January helping to dry the mature crop.

If our administrators want to postpone cultivation until irrigation tanks collect sufficient water for irrigation release, weeks and months will pass by, wasting precious rain water fallen on paddy fields. The majority of our farmers are lazy and would wait until the auspicious day declared by the administrators. Yet some others would waste further days and weeks prior to cultivation. The farmers who missed the cultivation for a few days for some reason still could join earlier cultivators by using a three-month variety of paddy, thereby catching up the lost two weeks.

Indications this year are that the weather gods are kind, will bring timely rainfall and favour paddy farmers for a bountiful Maha cultivation and harvest. But will our local gods occupying administrative seats postpone cultivation until irrigation tanks collect sufficient water? If our administrators too could learn and advice farmers to adhere to time-tested past traditions, every farmer will be assured with a plentiful harvest, without insect problems, while saving collected water in irrigation tanks for the Yala cultivation.

War criminal promoted to chief of Israel lobby group


Michael Herzog has been sued over his involvement in a 2002 attack on Gaza City. Ismael MohamadUPI Photo

David Cronin-26 September 2018
War criminals are seldom out of work. The shrewdest can turn a bloodstained history to their advantage.
The career of Israeli military strategist Michael Herzog is a good case in point.
Herzog has been sued by human rights activists over his role in a 2002 attack on Gaza. Despite – or perhaps because of – his association with state violence, Herzog’s analysis has been much in demand.
Without fanfare, Herzog has been promoted lately. He is now heading the Forum of Strategic Dialogue, a group which arranges confabs between Israel and Europe’s movers and shakers.
News of Herzog’s appointment was contained in a briefing note intended for the group’s donors. The note – published below – describes Herzog as a “renowned expert on Middle East policy issues” who has been a “leading figure in the Arab-Israeli peace process.”
Herzog may be so “renowned” to the donors that they do not need reminding of his full record. It has included supervising Israel’s bombing raids on Palestinians in the hope that nobody would escape from them alive.

Indicted

Herzog was a senior advisor in Israel’s defense ministry during the first decade of this century. The ministry was central to the planning of “targeted assassinations” carried out at that time.
The “targeted assassinations” were known to involve the destruction of civilian lives and infrastructure. Herzog was indicted for war crimes in a case brought under Spain’s law on universal jurisdiction.
The lawsuit initiated in Spain by the Palestinian Center for Human Rights related to a 2002 operation against al-Daraj, a district of Gaza City. The offensive was presented by Israel as focused on Salah Shehadeh, a commander with the Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ armed wing.
Fourteen people were killed in that attack, in addition to Shehadeh. Among them were eight children and two elderly men.
Since the lawsuit was filed, Spain has succumbed to pressure from Israel and watered down its law on universal jurisdiction.
The dilution occurred in 2009, a year that began with Operation Cast Lead, a massive Israeli bombardment of Gaza. Herzog was chief of staff to Ehud Barak, then Israel’s defense minister, during Cast Lead.
Both men ought to be put on trial for their part in that monstrous crime.
The cowardice of Madrid’s political elite has helped Herzog evade justice. Belonging to one of Israel’s most famous families has probably protected him too.
His father Chaim Herzog was Israel’s sixth president; Michael’s brother Isaac headed Israel’s Labor Party from 2013 until last year.
Michael Herzog had belonged to the team running the Forum of Strategic Dialogue before his recent promotion. He has also been hired by pro-Israel groups in London and Washington.
As an “expert” – often a euphemism for lobbyist – Herzog has addressed such topics as how to avoid violence in Gaza, omitting that he has personally inflicted suffering on Palestinians.

Flexibility

The Forum of Strategic Dialogue is a project run by another Israel advocacy group called the European Leadership Network.
In 2017, I wrote about how the “network” is willing to befriend almost anyone provided they support Israel. It has decided to cooperate with politicians in Poland and Germany who distort or deny incontrovertible facts about the Holocaust.
A flexibility can also discerned in its approach to staff recruitment.
Like many similar organizations, the European Leadership Network has taken a hostile stance towards Iran.
That has not stopped it from appointing Thomas Kessler to chair its branch in Berlin. As a real estate lawyer, Kessler has been working with a consultancy which encourages investment in Iran.
Kessler did not respond to a query asking if his professional activities were at odds with the objectives of the European Leadership Network. His silence indicates that the network is prepared to overlook such apparent contradictions for reasons of political expediency.
The current newsletter of the European Leadership Network – published below – betrays an obsession with kissing up to the powerful.
It states, for example, that the network is undertaking joint activities with Institut Montaigne, a Paris-based think tank. Institut Montaigne, according to the newsletter, was “instrumental” in drawing up Emmanuel Macron’s program when he was a candidate for the French presidency.
Macron has posed as a staunch ally of Israel. Is that about to change?
In his speech to the UN General Assembly this week, Macron claimed to fear the “law of the strongest and the temptation for each [nation] to follow its own law.”
If that is really a signal of Macron’s intolerance for rogue states, then he needs to go beyond mealy mouthed declarations and take action.
He could start by shunning Israel and its perverse lobby.

UNGA: Netanyahu focuses on Iran, Abbas asks US to reverse Jerusalem decision


Netanyahu accuses Iran of hiding nuclear-related material at warehouse in Tehran

Netanyahu shows supposed photo of alleged secret atomic warehouse in Iran (Reuters)

Thursday 27 September 2018
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu focused on Iran in his address to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) on Thursday, brushing over the peace process with Palestinians.
Meanwhile, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas used his speech at the UNGA to implore Washington to reverse its aggressive policies against Palestinians that he said have "undermined the two-state solution".
Relying on uncorroborated pictures and diagrams, Netanyahu on Thursday accused Iran of hiding nuclear-related material at a warehouse in Tehran, which he said proved it had not abandoned its nuclear weapons programme.
"Today I am disclosing for the first time that Iran has another secret facility in Tehran, a secret atomic warehouse for storing massive amounts of equipment and materiel from Iran's secret nuclear programme," Netanyahu said in a speech at the UN General Assembly that was mostly aimed at Iran.
He showed a supposed photo of the alleged warehouse, featuring an innocuous-looking cement wall with a metal gate in the middle.
He did not specify what the material was or suggest that Iran was actively violating a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, but his announcement is likely to bolster US efforts to take a harder line against Iran.
"Since we raided the atomic archive, they've been busy cleaning out the atomic warehouse. Just last month they removed 15 kilograms of radioactive material. You know what they did with it?" he said. "They took it out and they spread it around Tehran in an effort to hide the evidence."
Netanyahu in April unveiled what he said was archives that showed a secret Iranian nuclear weapons programme ahead of the United States' decision to pull out of the nuclear deal.
He said Iranian officials had started cleaning out the atomic warehouse, but still had a lot of work to do because there were some 15 shipping containers full of nuclear-related equipment and materials stored at the site.
"This site contained as much as 300 tonnes - 300 tonnes - of nuclear-related equipment and materiel," he said.
Under the nuclear deal struck by Iran and six major powers - Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States - Tehran agreed to limit its nuclear programme in return for relief from US and other economic sanctions.
READ MORE ► 
The International Atomic Agency (IAEA) has repeatedly said Tehran was abiding by its commitments to the deal. France, Britain, Germany, China and Russia have stayed in the pact, vowing to save it despite the restoration of US sanctions on Iran.
"While the United States is confronting Iran with new sanctions, Europe and others are appeasing Iran by trying to help it bypass those new sanctions," Netanyahu said.
Neither the IAEA nor Iran were immediately available for comment.
The Israeli leader also lambasted Iran's ballistic missile activity. He displayed a satellite image of Beirut, identifying three locations near the airport where he said Lebanon's Hezbollah was converting missiles. He did not provide any evidence to back that allegation.
"In Lebanon, Iran is directing Hezbollah to build secret sites to convert inaccurate projectiles into precision-guided missiles, missiles that can target deep inside Israel within an accuracy of 10 metres (yards)," he said.

Abbas pleads with US

Abbas on Thursday called on the United States to reverse its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital and cuts in aid to the Palestinians.
"With all of these decisions, this administration has reneged on all previous US commitments, and has undermined the two-state solution," Abbas said.
"I renew my call to President Trump to rescind his decisions and decrees regarding Jerusalem, refugees and settlements."
Abbas said the United States could no longer be the sole mediator of the peace process because of President Donald Trump's policies against Palestinians.
"The US acts as a mediator; however now we view the US with new eyes. The US cannot be a mediator single-handedly," Abbas said.
On Wednesday, Trump voiced support for the two-state solution, but his comments were dismissed by Palestinian officials who said his actions stand against the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.
Hamas on Thursday dismissed Trump's remarks on a two-state solution. Hazem Qassem, a Hamas spokesman, said the current White House administration had adopted the "rightist vision" of Israel's government.
Speaking in Gaza, Qassem said that Trump's decisions to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel "shows that he underestimates the Palestinian stance, and that is caused by the weakness of the official Palestinian stance represented by President Abbas."

Taiwan Can Win a War With China

Taiwanese soldiers simulate fending off an attempted invasion during an annual drill at the military base in Hualien on Jan. 30. (Mandy Cheng/AFP/Getty Images)Taiwanese soldiers simulate fending off an attempted invasion during an annual drill at the military base in Hualien on Jan. 30. (Mandy Cheng/AFP/Getty Images)

Beijing boasts it can seize the island easily. The PLA knows better.

When Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke to the 19th Party Congress about the future of Taiwan last year, his message was ominous and unequivocal: “We have firm will, full confidence, and sufficient capability to defeat any form of Taiwan independence secession plot. We will never allow any person, any organization, or any political party to split any part of the Chinese territory from China at any time or in any form.”

This remark drew the longest applause of his entire three-hour speech—but it’s not a new message. The invincibility of Chinese arms in the face of Taiwanese “separatists” and the inevitability of reunification are constant Chinese Communist Party themes. At its base, the threat made by Xi is that the People’s Liberation Army has the power to defeat the Taiwanese military and destroy its democracy by force, if need be. Xi understands the consequences of failure here. “We have the determination, the ability and the preparedness to deal with Taiwanese independence,” he stated in 2016, “and if we do not deal with it, we will be overthrown.”

China has already ratcheted up economic and diplomatic pressure on the island since the 2016 election of Tsai Ing-wen and the independence-friendly Democratic Progressive Party. Saber-rattling around the Taiwan Strait has been common. But China might not be able to deliver on its repeated threats. Despite the vast discrepancy in size between the two countries, there’s a real possibility that Taiwan could fight off a Chinese attack—even without direct aid from the United States.

Two recent studies, one by Michael Beckley, a political scientist at Tufts University, and the other by Ian Easton, a fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, in his book The Chinese Invasion Threat: Taiwan’s Defense and American Strategy in Asia, provide us with a clearer picture of what a war between Taiwan and the mainland might look like. Grounded in statistics, training manuals, and planning documents from the PLA itself, and informed by simulations and studies conducted by both the U.S. Defense Department and the Taiwanese Ministry of National Defense, this research presents a very different picture of a cross-strait conflict than that hawked by the party’s official announcements.
Chinese commanders fear they may be forced into armed contest with an enemy that is better trained, better motivated, and better prepared for the rigors of warfare than troops the PLA could throw against them.
Chinese commanders fear they may be forced into armed contest with an enemy that is better trained, better motivated, and better prepared for the rigors of warfare than troops the PLA could throw against them.
A cross-strait war looks far less like an inevitable victory for China than it does a staggeringly risky gamble.
Chinese army documents imagine that this gamble will begin with missiles. For months, the PLA’s Rocket Force will have been preparing this opening salvo; from the second war begins until the day the invasion commences, these missiles will scream toward the Taiwanese coast, with airfields, communication hubs, radar equipment, transportation nodes, and government offices in their sights. Concurrently, party sleeper agents or special forces discreetly ferried across the strait will begin an assassination campaign targeting the president and her Cabinet, other leaders of the Democratic Progressive Party, officials at key bureaucracies, prominent media personalities, important scientists or engineers, and their families.

The goal of all this is twofold. In the narrower tactical sense, the PLA hopes to destroy as much of the Taiwanese Air Force on the ground as it can and from that point forward keep things chaotic enough on the ground that the Taiwan’s Air Force cannot sortie fast enough to challenge China’s control of the air. The missile campaign’s second aim is simpler: paralysis. With the president dead, leadership mute, communications down, and transportation impossible, the Taiwanese forces will be left rudderless, demoralized, and disoriented. This “shock and awe” campaign will pave the way for the invasion proper.

This invasion will be the largest amphibious operation in human history. Tens of thousands of vessels will be assembled—mostly commandeered from the Chinese merchant marine—to ferry 1 million Chinese troops across the strait, who will arrive in two waves. Their landing will be preceded by a fury of missiles and rockets, launched from the Rocket Force units in Fujian, Chinese Air Force fighter bombers flying in the strait, and the escort fleet itself.

Confused, cut off, and overwhelmed, the Taiwanese forces who have survived thus far will soon run out of supplies and be forced to abandon the beaches. Once the beachhead is secured, the process will begin again: With full air superiority, the PLA will have the pick of their targets, Taiwanese command and control will be destroyed, and isolated Taiwanese units will be swept aside by the Chinese army’s advance. Within a week, they will have marched into Taipei; within two weeks they will have implemented a draconian martial law intended to convert the island into the pliant forward operating base the PLA will need to defend against the anticipated Japanese and American counter-campaigns.



Treacherous Conditions in the Taiwan Strait
Month Storm Seasons Average Wind/Wave Conditions Other Factors Suitability for Amphibious Operations
January Gales High Low clouds Poor
February Gales High Heavy fog* Poor
March N/A High to low** Heavy fog Varies
April N/A Low Heavy fog Good
May Plum rains Low Heavy fog Varies
June Plum rains Low Fog, currents*** Poor
July Typhoons Varies with storms Strong currents Poor
August Typhoons Varies with storms Strong currents Poor
September Typhoons Varies with storms Strong currents Poor
October N/A Low to high** N/A Good
November Gales High Low clouds Poor
December Gales High Low clouds Poor


*Fog is a major operational factor from Feb. 15 to June 15, with the worst fog in the morning hours of April and May. Overall, average visibility is 1.2 miles in spring, 2.4 miles in winter, and 6.2 miles in summer.

**The wind and wave conditions start out as high in early March and become very low by the end of the month. By October, that is reversed.

***Currents in the strait tend to be stronger in summer and weak in winter.

Sources: Ian Easton, The Chinese Invasion Threat: Taiwan ‘s Defense and American Strategy in Asia, p. 172.

This is the best-case scenario for the PLA. But an island docile and defeated two weeks after D-Day is not a guaranteed outcome. One of the central hurdles facing the offensive is surprise. The PLA simply will not have it. The invasion will happen in April or October. Because of the challenges posed by the strait’s weather, a transport fleet can only make it across the strait in one of these two four-week windows. The scale of the invasion will be so large that strategic surprise will not be possible, especially given the extensive mutual penetration of each side by the other’s intelligence agencies.

Easton estimates that Taiwanese, American, and Japanese leaders will know that the PLA is preparing for a cross-strait war more than 60 days before hostilities begin. They will know for certain that an invasion will happen more than 30 days before the first missiles are fired. This will give the Taiwanese ample time to move much of their command and control infrastructure into hardened mountain tunnels, move their fleet out of vulnerable ports, detain suspected agents and intelligence operatives, litter the ocean with sea mines, disperse and camouflage army units across the country, put the economy on war footing, and distribute weapons to Taiwan’s 2.5 million reservists.

There are only 13 beaches on Taiwan’s western coast that the PLA could possibly land at. Each of these has already been prepared for a potential conflict. Long underground tunnels—complete with hardened, subterranean supply depots—crisscross the landing sites. The berm of each beach has been covered with razor-leaf plants. Chemical treatment plants are common in many beach towns—meaning that invaders must prepare for the clouds of toxic gas any indiscriminate saturation bombing on their part will release. This is how things stand in times of peace.

As war approaches, each beach will be turned into a workshop of horrors. The path from these beaches to the capital has been painstakingly mapped; once a state of emergency has been declared, each step of the journey will be complicated or booby-trapped. PLA war manuals warn soldiers that skyscrapers and rock outcrops will have steel cords strung between them to entangle helicopters; tunnels, bridges, and overpasses will be rigged with munitions (to be destroyed only at the last possible moment); and building after building in Taiwan’s dense urban core will be transformed into small redoubts meant to drag Chinese units into drawn-out fights over each city street.

To understand the real strength of these defenses, imagine them as a PLA grunt would experience them. Like most privates, he is a countryside boy from a poor province. He has been told his entire life that Taiwan has been totally and fatally eclipsed by Chinese power. He will be eager to put the separatists in their place. Yet events will not work out as he has imagined. In the weeks leading up to war, he discovers that his older cousin—whose remittances support their grandparents in the Anhui countryside—has lost her job in Shanghai. All wire money transfers from Taipei have stopped, and the millions of Chinese who are employed by Taiwanese companies have had their pay suspended.

Our private celebrates the opening of hostilities in Shanwei, where he is rushed through a three-week training course on fighting in the fetid and unfamiliar jungles of China’s south. By now, the PLA has put him in a media blackout, but still rumors creep in: Yesterday it was whispered that the 10-hour delay in their train schedule had nothing to do with an overwhelmed transportation system and everything to do with Taiwanese saboteurs. Today’s whispers report that the commander of the 1st Marine Brigade in Zhanjiang was assassinated. Tomorrow, men will wonder if rolling power outages really are just an attempt to save power for the war effort.

But by the time he reaches the staging area in Fuzhou, the myth of China’s invincibility has been shattered by more than rumors. The gray ruins of Fuzhou’s PLA offices are his first introduction to the terror of missile attack. Perhaps he takes comfort in the fact that the salvos coming from Taiwan do not seem to match the number of salvos streaking toward it—but abstractions like this can only do so much to shore up broken nerves, and he doesn’t have the time to acclimate himself to the shock.

Blast by terrifying blast, his confidence that the Chinese army can keep him safe is chipped away.
The last, most terrible salvo comes as he embarks—he is one of the lucky few setting foot on a proper amphibious assault boat, not a civilian vessel converted to war use in the eleventh hour—but this is only the first of many horrors on the waters. Some transports are sunk by Taiwanese torpedoes,
released by submarines held in reserve for this day. Airborne Harpoon missiles, fired by F-16s leaving the safety of cavernous, nuclear-proof mountain bunkers for the first time in the war, will destroy others. The greatest casualties, however, will be caused by sea mines. Minefield after minefield must be crossed by every ship in the flotilla, some a harrowing eight miles in width.
 Seasick thanks to the strait’s rough waves, our grunt can do nothing but pray his ship safely makes it across.

As he approaches land, the psychological pressure increases. The first craft to cross the shore will be met, as Easton’s research shows, with a sudden wall of flame springing up from the water from the miles of oil-filled pipeline sunk underneath. As his ship makes it through the fire (he is lucky; others around it are speared or entangled on sea traps) he faces what Easton describes as a mile’s worth of “razor wire nets, hook boards, skin-peeling planks, barbed wire fences, wire obstacles, spike strips, landmines, anti-tank barrier walls, anti-tank obstacles … bamboo spikes, felled trees, truck shipping containers, and junkyard cars.”

At this stage, his safety depends largely on whether the Chinese Air Force has been able to able to distinguish between real artillery pieces from the hundreds of decoy targets and dummy equipment PLA manuals believe the Taiwanese Army has created. The odds are against him: As Beckley notes in a study published last fall, in the 1990 to 1991 Gulf War, the 88,500 tons of ordnance dropped by the U.S.-led coalition did not destroy a single Iraqi road-mobile missile launcher. NATO’s 78-day campaign aimed at Serbian air defenses only managed to destroy three of Serbia’s 22 mobile-missile batteries. There is no reason to think that the Chinese Air Force will have a higher success rate when targeting Taiwan’s mobile artillery and missile defense.

But if our grunt survives the initial barrages on the beach, he still must fight his way through the main Taiwanese Army groups, 2.5 million armed reservists dispersed in the dense cities and jungles of Taiwan, and miles of mines, booby traps, and debris. This is an enormous thing to ask of a private who has no personal experience with war. It is an even great thing to ask it of a private who naively believed in his own army’s invincibility.

This sketch makes sense of the anxiety the PLA officer manuals express. They know war would be a terrific gamble, even if they only admit it to each other. Yet it this also makes sense of the party’s violent reactions to even the smallest of arms sales to Taiwan. Their passion betrays their angst. They understand what Western gloom-and-doomsters do not. American analysts use terms like “mature precision-strike regime” and “anti-access and area denial warfare” to describe technological trends that make it extremely difficult to project naval and airpower near enemy shores. Costs favor the defense: It is much cheaper to build a ship-killing missile than it is to build a ship.

But if this means that the Chinese army can counter U.S. force projection at a fraction of America’s costs, it also means that the democracies straddling the East Asian rim can deter Chinese aggression at a fraction of the PLA’s costs. In an era that favors defense, small nations like Taiwan do not need a PLA-sized military budget to keep the Chinese at bay.

No one needs to hear this message more than the Taiwanese themselves. In my trips to Taiwan, I have made a point of tracking down and interviewing both conscripts and career soldiers. Their pessimism is palpable. This morale crisis in the ranks partly reflects the severe mismanagement of the conscription system, which has left even eager Taiwanese patriots disillusioned with their military experience.

But just as important is the lack of knowledge ordinary Taiwanese have about the strength of their islands’ defenses. A recent poll found that 65 percent of Taiwanese “have no confidence” in their military’s ability to hold off the PLA. Absent a vigorous campaign designed to educate the public about the true odds of successful military resistance, the Taiwanese people are likely to judge the security of their island on flawed metrics, like the diminishing number of countries that maintain formal relations with Taipei instead of Beijing. The PLA’s projected campaign is specifically designed to overwhelm and overawe a demoralized Taiwanese military. The most crucial battlefield may be the minds of the Taiwanese themselves. Defeatism is a more dangerous threat to Taiwanese democracy than any weapon in China’s armory.

Both Westerners and Taiwanese should be more optimistic about the defense of Taiwan than is now normal.

Yes, the Taiwanese Army projects that it can only hold off its enemy for two weeks after the landing—but the PLA also believes that if it cannot defeat the Taiwanese forces in under two weeks, it will lose the war! Yes, the disparity between the military budgets on both sides of the strait is large, and growing—but the Taiwanese do not need parity to deter Chinese aggression. All they need is the freedom to purchase the sort of arms that make invasion unthinkable. If that political battle can be resolved in the halls of Washington, the party will not have the power to threaten battle on the shores of Taiwan.
 
T. Greer is a writer and analyst formerly based out of Beijing. His research focuses on the evolution of East Asian strategic thought from the time of Sunzi to today.

‘Give it to me’: Trump lets loose with 81 minutes of bluster, falsehoods and insults

The Debrief: An occasional series offering a reporter’s insights 

President Trump held a news conference Sept. 26, following his meetings at the United Nations in New York.

President Trump’s 81-minute news conference Wednesday began predictably enough — with a first question tossed to a favored reporter (John Roberts) at a favorite network (Fox News) — before quickly careening into a televised drama that was as much public therapy session as a question-and-answer opportunity with reporters. 

By turns fiery and freewheeling, deadly serious and darkly humorous, an animated Trump delivered bluster, falsehoods, insults, breaking news and, as he quipped at one point, more than a hint of his trademark “braggadocios.”

But what was perhaps most remarkable was just how transparent and revealing Trump continues to be, the 45th president of the United States offering glimpses deep into the recesses of his mind as he gleefully took the nation on a tour de force of everything from the fate of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh (uncertain, but to be determined Thursday) to the job security of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein (uncertain, but probably fine for now) to his relationship with the New York Times (uncertain, but definitely tortured).

Asked by Weijia Jiang of CBS News about the three women who have alleged sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, his embattled nominee to the Supreme Court, the president offered an explanation for his instinctual reaction to side with nearly every powerful, accused man.

“You know why? Because I’ve had a lot of false charges made against me,” Trump said. “It’s happened to me many times. I’ve had many false charges. . . . So when you say does it affect me in terms of my thinking with respect to Judge Kavanaugh, absolutely, because I’ve had it many times.”

(The president then went on to incorrectly mention “four or five” accusers; in fact, he has been accused of unwanted sexual advances by more than a dozen women).

But Trump also publicly underscored his private frustrations with both Kavanaugh and the Senate confirmation process, raising the possibility that he could be persuaded to cut loose his Supreme Court nominee depending on how persuasive one of the accusers, Christine Blasey Ford, is when she testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.  

“They’re giving the women a major chance to speak. Now, it’s possible I’ll hear that and I’ll say, ‘Hey, I’m changing my mind.’ That is possible,” he said. “They’re going to have a big shot at speaking and making their case. And you know what? I can be persuaded, also. Okay?”

Later, Trump twice offered something of an evergreen admission — well known to White House aides who often compete to be the last person in the room with the president — declaring: “I can always be convinced. . . . I could be convinced of anything.” 

The president also addressed his planned meeting at the White House with Rosenstein on Thursday, a one-on-one confab during which Trump is expected to determine whether he plans to fire his deputy attorney general, accept his resignation or allow him to stay on the job. The meeting was scheduled in the wake of a New York Times report alleging that Rosenstein, who oversees the Russia investigation, last year had suggested secretly recording Trump and even invoking the 25th Amendment to remove him from office.

Trump said his preference is to keep the deputy attorney general in his post but added that he might ask to delay the meeting “because I don’t want to do anything that gets in the way of this very important Supreme Court pick.”

“I don’t want it competing and hurting the decision,” Trump said, displaying a former reality-TV star’s visceral understanding that no self-respecting network executive ever lets his top two prime-time dramas compete for top billing.

For a president facing one of the most consequential weeks of his presidency — and fighting for his Supreme Court nominee’s political life — Trump at times seemed blissfully unaware of the stakes, deeply enjoying himself as he bantered with the press corps.

At one point, he polled the crowd on whether he should allow NBC’s Hallie Jackson a follow-up query. “Should I let her ask another question?” he asked. (The verdict in the media-heavy room came back yes, and Jackson pressed Trump on whether he could cite a time when he has given the benefit of the doubt to a female accuser). 

Later, the president was still clearly enjoying himself.

“I could be doing this all day long,” he said. “Should we continue for a little while? It doesn’t matter to me.”

Trump’s obsession with the media was also fully on display, as he name-checked a number of outlets, recognized individual reporters with ease, and complimented a Sky News reporter on her company’s recent acquisition by Comcast.

“Congratulations on the purchase,” he said. “I hope you benefited.”

Trump called on two Kurdish reporters, including one whom he prompted, simply: “Yes, please. Mr. Kurd. Go ahead.”

He eagerly egged on a familiar Reuters reporter.

“Hit me with a bad one,” Trump said. “Go ahead. Give it to me.”

And he referred to the Times as if he was talking about a lost flame — “A paper I once loved” — and said that a number of networks would endorse him for president in the 2020 election because he’s good for ratings.

“They’re all going to endorse me because, if they don’t, they’re going out of business,” Trump said. “Can you imagine if you didn’t have me?”

The president’s genial demeanor even extended to a question about the audible laughter he faced this week at the United Nations General Assembly, when he boasted that his administration had accomplished more during its first two years than almost any other in the country’s history. 

“They weren’t laughing at me, they were laughing with me,” Trump said. “People had a good time with me. We were doing it together. We had a good time.”

Trump finished his news conference by evoking Elton John, saying that he, like the famous and flamboyant musician, wanted to conclude “with a good one.”

In many ways, Trump conducted the event like a showstopping concert. Every answer was its own distinct track, as if the president had set out to curate, albeit jam-band style, a complete set list, veering from classic riffs to improvised asides. 

At one point, the president suggested that during his tenure, he might have the opportunity to appoint more justices to the nation’s highest court. “I’m going to have to get other judges and other Supreme Court judges, possibly,” he said. “I could have a lot of Supreme Court judges, more than two.”

And in those two, tossed-aside sentences remained the whisper of an unspoken promise — the sort of encore performance that both Trump and Sir Elton John so love. 

War Hysteria and Beleaguered Working Class in South Asia

Human history is full of endless struggles and lessons

by Nayyar N Khan- 
( September 25, 2018, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) With continued violence in Jammu Kashmir and heightened threats of terrorist activities, mistrust between the two rivals and a threat of another serious military confrontation between India and Pakistan remains high. Territorial claims by both the neighbours over the Jammu Kashmir State sparked two of the three major Indo-Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries had succeeded in maintaining an insubstantial cease-fire since 2003, they repeatedly exchange fire across the contested Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu Kashmir. There was an increase in high-profile cease-fire violations beginning in July 2014, and artillery shelling and small arms fire continued through late 2016 and intensified in 2017 to mid-2018. 2017-18 shelling at LoC left dozens of civilian dead, hundreds wounded, schools closed for over a year, properties destroyed, crippled life and mass migration along both sides of LoC in Jammu Kashmir. Both sides accused each other of violating the cease-fire and claimed to be shooting in retaliation to attacks. After intense agitations across LoC and internationally by Kashmiri diaspora, human rights and peace groups, Pakistan army offered another cease-fire to India on May 29th 2018.
With new government in Pakistan, hopes for reconciliation and meaningful dialogues with India emerged but before even agreeing for composite dialogues, the diplomatic quarters began beating the same old war drums in both the countries. It is unfortunate that India and Pakistan have always been on the brink of war since the partition of one land into two countries. Once again war mongers on both sides are creating war hysteria. This is an undeniable fact that people living in both countries share common bonds in arts, history, literature, traditions, culture, languages and share a common civilization. Having so much in common to celebrate and co-exist in a serene mode, why war swords are always looming there? Is there any possibility of sustainable peace in one of the culturally rich and diverse region of the world or war hysteria would always be one of the merchantable article of trade? It is one of the fundamental question to be reciprocated by the key political stakeholders residing in both countries that what actually went wrong soon after partition; the people who lived together for centuries became each other’s enemy by simply accepting an artificial line on the same shared land? These and many other such questions can be asked by any apprehensive eyewitness of the South Asian region, where the resentment between the two major players has undesirably affected the ability of the region as a whole to attain its true prospective, unlike, for instance, the improvements made in the ASEAN region. The unrelenting skirmish and tautness in the liaison between the two countries, whose enmity has a nuclear aspect as well, cannot be to anyone’s benefit. For the past decade or so, their variances have surpassed their common borders and have also played out in Afghanistan. The biggest beneficiaries of this protracted conflict have been the fanatical elements in both countries and, more recently, the non-state actors (NSAs). The NSAs ostensibly have the capability to mess up and wreck any effort towards resolving the outstanding issues between India and Pakistan at will, by enacting a violent incident, as has been discussed and identified in Spy Chronicles. Major world and regional powers have also stimulated their geo-political interests by playing one country off against the other from time to time.

The fragile condition of the one of the densely populated region in the world has made it one of the least cohesive in the world besides having common bonds across the international borders.


The tensions between India and Pakistan are deeply rooted in their common history. Their fiasco to reconcile their differences eventually stemmed in creating an unending war hysteria in both countries. The partition itself was the result of a legal and constitutional process approved by both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League. Unfortunately, however, the actual partition was accompanied by mindless blood-letting and enduring hostility consequential to grievances about the work of the Radcliffe Commission that was assigned with the demarcation of the frontiers of the two states. The shambolic formula espoused by the British for determining the fate of the Princely States, strewed the seeds of the unending conflict over the ownership of Jammu and Kashmir.
Now the entire South Asia has been shadowed by the overwhelming trepidation of security concerns, cross-border conflicts and poor connectivity. The fragile condition of the one of the densely populated region in the world has made it one of the least cohesive in the world besides having common bonds across the international borders. Firstly, India and Pakistan being two nuclear rivals and key states of the region have always been on forefronts since their creation in 1947. Secondly, political religions have always been leading dynamics in classifying the geo-political tendencies while valuing the Indo-Pak relations. Although India claims to maintain her secular traditions but in practice religion was one of the stimulating components that wedged the Indian politics. While Pakistani politicians, on the other hand have consistently failed to identify the common “Political Nomenclature”. Instead of looking for the common bonds to strengthen the democratic character politicians have always preferred to take refuge under the imported umbrella of identification and sadly ignored the true sentiments of the struggling masses.
Due to the endless war hysteria created by the ruling elite, today, the oppressed working class of entire sub-continent has been condensed to the animal- mode- of- existence. And even this very existence is warranted only if they remain loyal to the doctrine of ruling class. “South Asian Democracy” under the present Machiavellian physiognomies means nothing other than the process of legitimizing the plunder and suppression of the oppressed by the oppressor and ‘peace’ means obedience, servitude and quietness of the oppressed. The true peace in the sub-continent and emancipation of masses from the economic and ideological exploitation cannot be achieved until the working class of entire region do not unite against their common enemy, the oppressing class and her mechanisms. Therefore, the real struggle lies not between the masses across the borders; it is against the ruling class across the region. While it is an undeniable fact that freedom to exercise free will and creating the system of their own choice is a fundamental right of the people of Jammu Kashmir, it is equally important for the masses of India and Pakistan to understand and recognize that the struggle for the right of self-determination, while local in form, is non-local in content as the conditions of oppression and exploitation of Jammu Kashmir also provide basis for the unending exploitation of the masses across the Indo-Pak borders. The prevailing colonial and bourgeois exploitation must end to safeguard a collective better tomorrow.
The working class of Jammu Kashmir being under the direct colonial oppression, on one hand, lacking control on its resources and on the other hand encompassing the essential topographies in common with that of bourgeois society of its oppressors bears the worst form of exploitation. Subsequently, the swelling redundancy, grinding poverty, diseases, hunger and starvation have stripped off its corona from the majority of masses in entire region. The laborers, students, elderly, women, children the peasants and daily wage workers across sub-continent find it difficult to rise above the animal level of existence and it is a distant dream for them. The working class of the region is sinking steadily into the bottommost strata of society and their scarce capital does not suffice any more to earn them and their families an anticipated prospect. The new generation, in particular students, find themselves in a society that is incapable of amply providing them a space for their ingenuity, vision and drive. Quality education that should have been a basic right of all citizens has become a commodity only rich can buy. Rather than serving as a means to overcome inequality, the current crippling education system reinforces it. Furthermore, the lack of proper employment and the opportunities to earn decent living has compelled the young graduates and skillful individuals to migrate and find jobs abroad. This ‘brain drain’ is a clear magnitude of the inherent inefficiency of our system. In short, majority of masses do not have access to basic human needs despite their never ending struggle and they are forced to live with heavy burden of life while seeing no hope in near future. Consequently, today our society has reduced to anything but a decent society. The poverty levels in both Pakistan and India are now resting at an identical yet alarming 29.5 per cent level, meaning thereby that every third Pakistani and Indian is literally fighting every hour just to beat hunger and looming starvation.
Human history is full of endless struggles and lessons. Among countless lessons in the evolutionary phases, there is one distinctive lesson that can be drawn by going through the pages of hitherto history and it could be summed up as “if the people are to co-exist peacefully and respectfully and advance their life, they must be free of any kind of oppression and enjoying equal standards in rights.” Going deep down the pages of history we also come to know that as long as the mistreatment and exploitation of one class by the other exists and the majority of human race living in a particular region is deprived of fundamental rights and prospects to develop in a free environment without fear; the slogans of democracy, peace and justice are absurd and hushed and bunkum hotchpotches. And this is the basic point, the working class and poor masses of India and Pakistan need to focus on, in order to progress and develop collectively. Having identified South Asia as an epicenter of terrorism and religious extremism, the poor masses living in the region must have an interest to ask a question to those institutions responsible for world peace and security to work with India and Pakistan in ensuring regional stability, preventing nuclear weapons proliferation, and minimizing the potential of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan.
Either one of them is at the wrong side of history or the ruling elite in both the countries considers it a profitable business to keep one of the thickly populated region in chaos. Ultimate victims of this unending war hysteria are the poor masses and working class in both countries. For a lasting peace, the working class in both countries should build the counter strategy to affectively challenge the failed narratives of either state. Otherwise, war-mongers would once again be winning by fueling and igniting the clashing tools.
Nayyar N Khan is a US based human rights activist and freelance journalist of Kashmiri origin. His area of concentration isInternational Peace and Conflict Resolution. He can be reached @ globalpeace2002@hotmail.com. He tweets as kashsoul