Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, July 14, 2018

Protest in Colombo in solidarity with Tamil families of the disappeared

Home14Jul 2018

Civil society groups and human rights activists demonstrated in Colombo on Friday to show their support for the ongoing struggle for justice by families of the disappeared. 
Holding placards and banners, demonstrators urged the government to provide answers to the whereabouts of missing loved ones and drew attention the plight of families who have been protesting on the issue for over 500 days. 
In a letter submitted to the Sri Lankan president, the protesters urged him to fulfil his promises and release the least of those detained by the military. 
"Enforced disappearance is one of the most horrific crimes known to humanity. For decades, the people of Sri Lanka have lived in fear of enforced disappearances, and have suffered its cruel consequences. Enough is enough, President Sirisena. End the suffering now. Provide families of the disappeared with the truth, justice, and reparations they are entitled to."
Read full letter here

From Eliya To Andura And On To A Vipath Maga

The recent public statements by Rev Vendaruwe Upali Thero, Anunayake of the Asgiriya Chapter at a celebration of Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa‘s birthday, Ms Vijayakala Maheswaran, former State minister at a public meeting in Jaffna, and a personal attack by retired Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekara on Dr Deepika Udagama, Chairperson of the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) deserve articulate public condemnation by us all.
Rev Upali exhorted Mr Rajapaksa to give leadership for good governance, even if he has to be “a Hitler” to do this. Some weeks later Mr Weerasekara denounced Dr Udagama as an LTTE supporter and a traitor to this country, with the battle cry “death to traitors”.  Ms Vijayakala Maheswaran called for a return of the LTTE to ensure the security protection and progress of the people of the North, and especially their women and children. These statements have a common link. Delivered on public platforms, they encourage support for authoritarian and dictatorial governance as a legitimate and acceptable form of good governance. They also spread messages that directly or indirectly advocate the worst forms of violence, intolerance and hate.
Such statements seek support for the establishment of a Sinhala Buddhist majoritarian State and a minority Tamil Eelam respectively,  in a land that has since antiquity been home to a diverse population of many communities and that has also experienced the horrors of armed conflict, in the name of restoring ethnic and religious identity. Ms Maheswaran’s statement denies a reality that the whole country and the world knows: a dictatorial and authoritarian LTTE regime brought violence, destruction and suffering to the Tamil community and all our people. These spoken and published exhortations seek to trample and eliminate the core values of a religion that the Buddha taught should be based on non-violence and sensitivity to human anguish.
Centuries ago, the Buddha explained in his discourses, a message included with clarity in the great text, the Dhammapada, that hatred, violence and triumphalism only breed hatred and more violence. This, he said, is a lived reality, ‘as the defeated live in pain’. Messages advocating hatred, violence and authoritarianism from a senior member of the Buddhist clergy, a former member of the armed forces and a member of parliament, that are now in the public domain, must be recognised for their destructive power. They must be challenged and also rejected by us as a people who want progress and development, without the evils of abuse of power, or armed conflict.  Human history shows us that dictatorships and hatred for the diversity of people bring war, destruction and suffering, rather than benevolent governance to the people.
We also need to denounce a growing culture that distorts the responsibilities of persons who hold public office in the country. We have become accustomed to forgive and forget the misdeeds and corruption of ‘nice and good’ public officials who bend their knee to politicians, seeing them as helpless victims of a debased political system. We have also legitimised personal attacks on holders of public office who try to fulfill their professional and public duties with personal integrity and courage. The recent denunciation of Dr Udagama as an apologist for the LTTE, is symptomatic of this vicious culture of denigration.
Dr Udagama is an academic and a professional who has held public office with courage, dignity and independence, and deep commitment to public service. She has conformed to the highest standards of personal integrity and is widely respected for these qualities. She has given leadership, during her brief tenure as chairperson, and helped the Commission to fulfill the promise of the 19th amendment, in establishing independent commissions. Sri Lanka’s HRC under the previous regime was downgraded by both the International and Asian bodies monitoring the work of Human Rights Commissions. The work done by our own HRC has received recognition recently as one of the best among countries that have set up such agencies to help deliver justice, and implement the rule of law. The recent attempt to attack her credibility and public service must be denounced for its viciousness and untruthfulness.
In 2015, a majority of our people, including at least a third of the Sinhala Buddhist voters, rejected a former political regime and its leadership. The late Rev Maduluwave Sobitha Thero helped to create a movement that focused on the need for change. The period after national elections should have been a time to strengthen the links between participatory democratic governance and community wellbeing, with efficiency and political commitment. The government has failed to live up to the promises made to the people.  These failures are now creating   the impression that authoritarian dictatorship and that type of leadership is the solution the country requires, and demands.
We must recognize that opportunities have been missed, but give credit for some minimal positive changes. The 19th Amendment, despite some limitations, forged a consensus and was enacted into law. The establishing  of independent commissions, especially the HRC, and the passing of a Right to Information Act with a Commission responsible for implementing it, have set norms, standards and procedures that have benefited the public. Many of the aberrations of the past, like abductions and extrajudicial killings of political opponents and media personnel are no longer an accepted dimension of governance.
However the President, the Prime Minister and the government have failed to fulfill the core commitments to the public they undertook when they were elected to office. Looking over their shoulders constantly at the joint oppositions discourse, the government and its leadership have repeated past mistakes, and have become trapped in identity politics. Despite protests in many quarters, and demands for a new political culture, we continue to witness political patronage in appointments, widespread misuse of public funds, inefficiency and corruption, and political interference in public administration. Consequently those who hold public office and are accountable to the public, have sometimes become partners with politicians in the failures and inefficiencies of governance.
Prosecution of emblematic cases of corruption and violence continue to be hampered by a paper trail of investigation that is never ending. In other countries, as we have seen recently, such cases are investigated and prosecuted.

Read More

Mangala raps Mahinda


A chorus? Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera and State Finance Minister Eran Wickramaratne simultaneously gesture at the media briefing yesterday - Pic by Upul Abayasekara

  • Dismisses allegations made by former President and Finance Minister on fuel pricing formula and Govt. revenue
  • Reiterates economy progressive and despite latest revision fuel prices still lower than MR era
  • Recalls how Rajapaksa exercised executive powers to disregard SC ruling for lowering fuel prices
  • Challenges MR to a public debate
  • Exposes Rs. 10.2 b loss to Govt. via infamous oil hedging deal 
  • Promises to expose findings of investigation on ex-CB Chief Cabraal
  • Eran emphasises pricing formula is best mechanism and most transparent 
logo

By Charumini de Silva-Saturday, 14 July 2018

Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera yesterday levelled a scathing criticism against former President Mahinda Rajapaksa for misleading the public on the new fuel price formula, claiming his conduct was “unbecoming of a senior politician of the country”.

“The former President who was also Finance Minister is trying to influence the general public without fully acknowledging the facts. I would like to remind him that the fuel prices with the latest revision under this Government are still lower than what it was during his tenure,” Samaraweera told journalists.

Denying all allegations levelled against him, the Minister challenged the former President again to a public debate to “clear all the facts”.

“As a senior politician in the country, it is sad to see Mahinda Rajapaksa stoop down to low levels. I think it is better we clear the facts in an open debate and let people of this country know the truth,” the Minister challenged. The Minister denied Rajapaksa’s accusation that the price revision was done to increase Government revenue insisting that the country’s economy was progressing on a strong foundation after many years.

Denying the allegation that pricing formula was brought in to increase Government revenue, Samaraweera said Rajapaksa used his Executive powers to disobey the Supreme Court when it ordered the then Government to reduce the price of a petrol litre, as they were covering up the oil hedging deal.
Likening the infamous hedging deal during the Rajapaksa tenure to a ‘gamble’ between former Central Bank Governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal and Rajapaksa, which cost the Government coffers Rs. 10.2 billion.

“I have done an investigation on Nivard’s deals, which will be exposed soon,” he added.

Samaraweera also noted that it was during Rajapaksa’s tenure that the rupee depreciated overnight from Rs. 110.57 to Rs. 127. The Minister said the strengthening of the dollar had not only impacted the Sri Lankan Rupee, but it had an effect on regional economies as well. Thereby, he called on the general public not to get flustered unnecessarily.

Samaraweera said according to the Cabinet approval given this week the Government will revise fuel prices on the 10th of every month, deviating from the initial plan of a bi-monthly review on the fifth day.

“During the discussion, I suggested we change it every week, but the Ceylon Petroleum Cooperation (CPC) rejected to changing it weekly or daily. However, we will consider a weekly review in future,” he quipped.

The Minister also emphasised on giving more teeth to the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA) to monitor errant traders taking undue advantages of the fuel price fluctuations, while adding that they were considering in bring in a new Act as the present legislation was not strong enough to take necessary action.

State Finance Minister Eran Wickramaratne said the pricing formula was the best mechanism to determine fuel prices and had been successfully practiced around the world.

He also said just like the price formula increases prices when international oil price surge, the benefits will be passed on to when it declines, which is a highly-accepted and transparent methodology.

Wickramaratne claimed the benefits of the fuel price subsidies were disproportionately enjoyed by the rich in the country, noting that the most affluent 10% of the population enjoyed 31% of the benefits of the subsidised fuel prices.

New York Times’ selective focus on China



2018-07-14
While much ink has already been spilled over The New York Times’ recent piece on Chinese bribes allegedly given to the Rajapaksa camp ahead of the 2015 presidential election, some interesting questions remain to be addressed. 

Setting aside, for now, the report’s inaccuracies (such as describing the Port City project as a ‘terminal’ in Colombo port, built by China Harbour, which held 50 acres of land over which Sri Lanka had no sovereignty, leaving officials with ‘little real control’ when a Chinese submarine called in 2014), among the questions that need to be asked are: Why China? And why now? What’s the rationale for America’s ‘newspaper of record’ taking the trouble to resurrect, at this point in time, a three-year-old report from Sri Lanka’s state-run Daily News about a corruption investigation that led nowhere?  

From a news point of view, there are two main elements in the story that would be grist to the mill of any newspaper. One is the aspect of corruption in high places, and the other is that of meddling in other peoples’ elections. NYT chose to write about alleged Chinese meddling in Sri Lanka’s election while ignoring reports that RAW (Research & Analysis Wing) the spy agency of US’s strategic ally India, allegedly influenced the outcome by facilitating defections from the SLFP so that a former SLFP minister could run as the common candidate in a UNP-led campaign. The strategy succeeded in bringing about regime-change by wresting a sufficient number of Sinhala-majority votes from the SLFP to tilt the numbers, in combination with the traditionally UNP-friendly minority vote. The UNP-led campaign was peppered with anti-China rhetoric.  

The timing of this story is also interesting in the way it effectively deflected media attention from a much bigger corruption scandal involving prominent government figures

The strategic nexus between the US and India has been growing apace in recent years. Former US president Barack Obama in his speech as chief guest at India’s Republic Day celebration on 26th January 2015 – just weeks after Sri Lanka concluded its 8th January election – said the US “welcomes a greater role for India in the Asia Pacific” and went on to mention Sri Lanka: “India can play a role in helping countries forge a better future, from Burma to Sri Lanka, where today there’s new hope for democracy. With your experience in elections you can help other countries with theirs.”   
China meanwhile has been identified by the US as the reason for its heightened interest in the Indian Ocean and its pursuit of stronger defence ties with India. The US position was clearly spelt out by former US Secretary of Defence Rex Tillerson in a speech at Washington’s Centre for Strategic and International Studies last October. Sri Lanka is currently caught up in a tug-of-war between US and China in their fight for dominance in the Indian Ocean region on account of its strategic location, straddling important sea lanes connecting Asia with the Middle East and Africa. It’s not hard to see how targeting alleged Chinese corruption in relation to a strategic asset like Hambantota port would serve US strategic interests. The allegation that former president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s campaign benefited from it, kills two birds with one stone by discrediting both China and a political leader seen as being too-China-friendly, at the same time.   

When Western powers’ strategic interests are at stake, Western mainstream media typically tend to align with their respective government’s positions in reporting an issue. This could be seen in their reporting on Iraq, Ukraine and Syria for example. With the US’s strategic focus shifting to the Pacific and Indian oceans the NYT report on Sri Lanka illustrates how US mainstream media serve their government’s interests in this region.  

But the election is over, and MR lost. So this brings us to the second question: why now?   
February’s landslide victory at the local government elections by Rajapaksa’s new political formation, with a presidential election and general election set to take place in 2019 and 2020, may help explain the timing. The local poll results shook up the US-friendly yahapalana government by showing where popular support now lies. Given the high stakes in the big powers’ games of one-upmanship in the Indian Ocean, it would not be surprising to see more ‘news’ of this type reaching Sri Lankan shores in the months ahead.  

The timing of this story is also interesting in the way it effectively deflected media attention from a much bigger corruption scandal involving prominent government figures. Though corruption is a main focus of the NYT piece, it chose to focus on an alleged Chinese bribe of US$ 7.6 million in a past election, when all eyes were currently on the ‘bond scam.’ It involves the much bigger sum of US$ 69 million (Rs.11 billion) that former Central Bank governor Arjuna Mahendran is accused of embezzling, with the main beneficiary being his son-in-law Arjun Aloysius’s company Perpetual Treasuries Ltd. (PTL).   

So far, it has been revealed that two ministers and an MP received cheques from Aloysius or PTL-affiliated companies, which they said they used in their campaign for the August 2015 parliamentary election. The first bond scam had already been exposed in February 2015, and their claims that they ‘didn’t know’ where the money came from, rang hollow. The fact that two of them offered to refund the money suggests they were not comfortable with it. The media naturally had a field day with this abundant supply of headline-making news. But after the NYT story broke, reporters have stopped button-holing various MPs and sticking microphones in front of them to ask “Did you take PTL money?”   

An issue that Sri Lanka really needs to be concerned about as an outcome of recent exposures and allegations of election campaign-related corruption, is the urgent need for laws to regulate election campaign financing. The politicians who benefited from PTL’s largesse have made remarks to the effect that accepting donations was ‘ok,’ that it is ‘normal’ for businessmen to support election campaigns, that ‘no one spends their own money’ etc. If it is ‘not ok’ to take money from a tainted company, is it ‘ok’ to take from a reputable company? Who’s to know about the reputation of donors if there is no account of the funds, where they came from or what they were used for? If no limit is set on the amount, does the party with richer friends and more donations have an unfair advantage? And what about foreign funding?  

It would seem that Sri Lankan politicians of all stripes and from both the mainstream parties are content to continue with the present unregulated system when it comes to election campaign financing. This could be one reason why no party is eager to pursue its opponent over this particular issue. The Rajapaksa administration was accused of high-level corruption and was unseated on an anti-corruption platform in 2015. Where the UNP is concerned, apart from the bond scam exposures there is at least one election-finance related petition submitted for investigation by the bribery commission (CIABOC), alleging Rs. 60 million given to a high ranking UNPer by a businessman in 2001. The petitioner, former state minister Rajiva Wijesinha says he believes the money was used to bribe MPs “to cross over so as to bring down the government which president Kumaratunga had constituted following the 2000 election.”   

With foreign powers showing heightened interest in Sri Lanka, and the possibility of election-related bribes of a much higher order being offered in exchange for influence, the need for campaign-finance laws becomes all the more urgent. In this new context their absence leaves a gaping hole that threatens not only the integrity of elections, but now, the national interest as well.

Integrate Tamil ex-militants into society

Vijayakala’s protests repeat what Northern Tamils are grousing about


article_image
Vijayakala meets Tamil political prisoners
http://www.omlanka.net/news/2093-vijayakala-meets-political-prisoners.html

Kumar David- 

There are few things at this late stage of life that give me more pleasure than thumbing my nose at racists, craven politicians and adults who believe in Aesop’s fables; all these types I hope are outraged by this piece. Here is a summary of what I will elaborate in the remainder of this article.


* There has to be a genuine, well thought out and energetic programme to rehabilitate Tamil ‘youth’ who were involved in the civil war back into society and the democratic process

* Sinhala chauvinists will demonise this as capitulation to Tamil terrorism (for example Dayan Jayatilleka’s piece "Vijayakala’s suicide bombing, Northern Nazism, the Tamil Hitler and north-south politics" in the Island of 5 July). Such efforts must be exposed, opposed and eviscerated.

* Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Joint Opposition are the principal organs of chauvinism, the Dead Left of Vasudeva, Vitarana and Raja Collure its auxiliaries, reactionary monks its ideologues, former military officers its strong-arm and businesses finance it. The rising Hitler is Gota.

* The UNP section of this government has done much less than it could have to redress post-war grievances of Northern Tamils. The President and SLFP are ingrained racists - refusal to release or prosecute Tamil political prisoners is one example of betrayal of a Sirisena election pledge.

* The LTTE and Prabakharan were terrorists and assassinated Duraippah, Amirthalingam, Rajiv Gandhi and Premadasa, made an attempt on Chandrika’s life, and carried out indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets. They murdered Rajini, Neelan, Anandarajan, Vijayakala’s husband Maheswaran and many others. The LTTE slew hundreds of cadres of other militant groups.

* At the same time, however, it stood up and fought against Tamil oppression and for this reason Tamils admire Prabakharan and the LTTTE. This and the previous point are facts of history that cannot be wished away by apologists on either side of the chauvinist divide. History is what was, not what the par-blind wish it had been.

I believe these points are true, not conjecture. It would be marvellous if it were not so, but if wishes were wings, pigs would fly. I also believe that it is from this prevailing reality that we must start out if we are to understand and progress. The first condition is intellectual integrity; I invite you to accept these points as a truthful summary of the status quo. Austin Fernando says in another context "It will be difficult if politicians, public service leaders, law enforcers, judiciary, media and civil society do not individually and severally shoulder the reform process". But hopes of such felicitous unanimity are farfetched, hence oft times we will need to swim against hostile currents.

I can only make a rough estimate of the number of cadres not only of the LTTE but also of other movements (TELO, PLOTE, EPRLF and EROS) who still stand outside the political process though many individuals and organisations have already re-entered the mainstream. There are12,000 Tamil political prisoners - I presume nearly all are former armed cadres. If one adds to this those not apprehended or who quit the movements before the war ended but continue to be resentful of the Sinhala State, the number of ex-cadres who psychologically stands outside the system is much larger, maybe 30,000 to 50,000.

There are in addition sympathisers who did not get involved in the war, and also Tamils who since the end of the war have come to feel alienated. The July 5 ‘Daily News’ editorially intones "Although the LTTE was militarily defeated, Tamil youth still harbour nostalgia. Chief Minister Wigneswaran, who is not shy of defending the LTTE, has a huge such following. Vijayakala has no alternative but to follow if she hopes to re-enter parliament." This suggests that the alienated Tamil population that shuns the state may number in the hundreds of thousands; a perilous predicament for Lanka’s future.

In the case of the JVP, after the insurrection of 1971, and after the Pol-Potinian savagery of 1989-90 when more lives are said to have been lost than in the civil-war, governments and civil society came to their senses and evolved a programmes that brought the JVP within the bounds of democracy and the social ethos of the nation. However there is opposition to an undertaking of similar nature in the case of Tamil ex-militants. This is partly for racial reasons (villains of the "other race" are more hated than villains of "our race"). The other reason is that race-baiting propagandists of the Rajapaksa genre (eg. Jayatilleka’s piece cited above) exert themselves to keep ethnic antagonism alive. Some media outlets use Vijayakala’s controversial speech as a mirror image of Asgiriya Anunayake Vendaruwe Upali’s exhortation to Gota to embrace Hitler as his role model. This is incorrect as I will argue below.

The way the JVP was rehabilitated was correct, though the regimes of the day also blundered. In like manner ex-LTTE cadres too should be brought within the democratic political process. This would be wise. Whether a new-style LTTE (like the new-style post-Wijeweera JVP) will one day enter the mainstream is speculative and depends on willingness the hypothetical new-style, maybe new-name, entity to renounce terrorism and embrace democratic norms. Let us leave speculation aside and for now focus on creating avenues for individuals to acquire political legitimacy. To this extent Vijayakala is on the ball and on sound moral ground; her courage is praiseworthy. I am afraid I don’t know more about her except to say I support her campaign of opposition to the incarceration of Tamil youth without trial.

Her anger that school-girls are raped, that parents are afraid to send children outdoors, that the dire condition of widows has been ignored and that the return of some lands seized by the military is all that has been done, is a constant refrain I hear from Jaffna people. Lanka e-news translates Vijayakala as having said: "If our children and women are to come home safely, an LTTE administration is again necessary" [htpp://s3.lankaenews.com/en_news_image/Wijayakala31.jpg]. I think it is obvious if you listen to the whole speech that hers is an expression of exasperation; a verbal ejaculation to say ‘Tamils did not have such a bad time even when they lived under those bastards who killed my husband’. The reasons for her anger are understandable and acceptable though taken literally her statement is a politically stupid verbal excess even if the precise intent of "bad time" is arguable. Interestingly though, Vijayakala, whatever party she contests from, is certain to be returned to parliament with a thumping majority next time. A spate of such events, if they occur, will set the scene for the next stage in Lanka’s ethnic imbroglio.

There are demands to bring her to trial for treason and lock her up; preventing her re-election may be a motive, though I don’t think dimwits think that far ahead. Be that as it may, on the one hand while I am opposed to secession at the present time, simultaneously I opine that threatening those who campaign for secession with imprisonment is undemocratic and an impediment to freedom of expression. Such laws should be repealed. Should two million voters in Catalonia in October 2017 (90%) and 1.6 million in Scotland (45%) in September 2014 be put behind bars, greatly swelling the expenses of their respective Spanish and Britannic Majesties?

I hope Vijayakala stands firm and refuses to retract the concerns she is projecting. What are they? No credible development programme in the North, fear and insecurity, refusal to form an Administrative Secretariat in the Thennamarachi District, little done for 30,000 war widows etc. Now she has been forced to resign her ministership because the government is in a funk in the face of a chauvinist backlash; but thankfully this will free her hands to stand firm on the national question. Elections are due and a fascistic-chauvinist tide is on the rise, it is no surprise that the UNP and its leaders are sallow cowards; the country trapped between diffidence and extremism. Nevertheless it remains true that though a UNP-Ranil (or Karu or Mangala or Sajith) victory promises little for the morrow, a Gota-UPFA-Mahinda conquest will herald hard-power and a diminution of freedom.

To stem this trend we cannot depend on possible UNP presidential candidates, whether Ranil, Karu, Sajith, nor on the UNP’s parliamentary morons. Sirisena is an insidious fifth-column, the Dead Left traitors. The Better-Left (JVP, ULF, Bahu’s NSSP etc.) and the residues of liberalism need to pull together. Left-unity is useful, but paradoxically the obstacle is the JVP, potentially its biggest beneficiary. A united left and bold liberals who are willing to align must, without illusions but out of necessity, collaborate with the UNP, democratic SLFPers and Tamil and Muslim organisations. The challenge of working together demands flexibility and intelligence; both in woeful short supply especially in the JVP. The unwillingness, nay the obstacles placed in the way of a left-unity strategy by the JVP, which it is in a position to spearhead, prior to dealing with the UNP and SLFP, is hard to comprehend.

Hitler and the LTTE: On Polarisation and Fascism

Featured image by Vikalpa

JUDE FERNANDO-07/13/2018

If they call you a Hitler, then be a Hitler and build this country.—Ven. Vendaruwe Upali Thero (Anunayaka of the Asgiriya Chapter), advising Lt. Col. Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, the former Secretary of Defense.

Now we remember how we lived before May 18, 2009. In the present conditions our main intention is to bring back the LTTE if we want to live, if we want to walk freely, if we need our children to attend schools and return back.—Vijayakala Maheswaran, M.P, United National Party.

The World Cup: Between and beyond the goal posts



article_image
The Queen presents Bobby Moore the 1966 World Cup at Wembley

Rajan Philips- 

"It’s coming home" – football is coming home, is the chant of the English football fans, first started when England hosted the Euro in 1996 and revived this year as English hopes rose over the last two weeks after a surprising run by a very young English national team in the 2018 World Cup in Russia. England led by the legendary Bobby Moore won the World Cup for the first time and only time in 1966 when it also hosted the tournament. The hopes of winning again after 52 years were doused last Wednesday by Croatia, a country of four million people, who defeated England 2-1 in the second semi-final to clinch a place in today’s final. Croatia will play France, who got the better of Belgium in the first semi-final on Tuesday. This is Croatia’s first appearance in a World Cup Final, and France’s third. France, 1998 winner and 2006 runner-up, is the favoured team, but they will have to prove it later today in Moscow’s Luzhniki Stadium. The World Cup will be ‘coming home’ to either Paris or Zagreb, not London.

It should be an interesting, even riveting, final, as indeed the whole tournament has been – unpredictable, open ended, with extraordinary individual and team talents in full competitive display. The tournament favourites have fallen and gone one by one. Two giants of European and international soccer, Italy and Netherlands, did not even qualify to play in Russia. Reigning champions, Germany, could not go past the first round, finishing fourth in their group of four. Germany lost to Mexico in the opening game, squeezed out a last second victory against Sweden thanks to an awesome set-piece goal by Toni Kroos, but thoroughly imploded in the final group game going down 2-0 to plucky South Korea. The German team had all the great names but not the legs to match the younger usurpers. With Germany’s exit, the last four reigning World Cup champions have failed to pass the group stage while defending their championship title.

The South American teams after initial good showings also perished in the knockout stages, leaving the 2018 semi-finals an all European contest – France v. Belgium and Croatia v. England. Brazil, the perpetual favourite, was done in by talented Belgium in the quarter finals. Brazil had earlier eliminated Mexico in the first knockout round. Uruguay could not maintain its early promise in the quarterfinals against France. France had seen off Argentina 4-3 in the first knockout round. That match was described by pundits as one of the great contests in World Cup history. It indeed was a great game, with Argentina putting up a strong show after its lack lustre performance in the group matches. Alas, it wasn’t enough for Argentina, previous winners in 1978 and 1986, to give its icon Lionel Messi, considered the greatest ever soccer player, another chance to win the game’s biggest prize. Argentina and Messi were the losing finalists to Germany in Brazil in 2014. It was a touching sight of sportsmanship and camaraderie after the game to see every member of the young French team hugging Messi with empathy and respect. Messi’s torch, it is said, has now been passed to Frances teenage sensation at this World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, one of the many French players with African roots.

The other and the more self-promoting all time soccer great, Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal began with a hat trick in the drawn group game against Spain. Portugal was eliminated by Uruguay in the knockout stage, but that did not stop Ronaldo from upstaging the World Cup in Russia with his inter-club self-trading elsewhere in Europe – selling himself out of Spain’s Real Madrid club after nearly a decade with them and buying into Juventus in Turin, Italy, for a pricy sum of $130 million on a four year contract. Big money dominates big sports. And the commercialization of sports as mass entertainment is now an integral part of global capitalism. And bigger the event or organization more fertile they are for corruption to sink roots and thrive. The World Cup is the pinnacle of all commercialized sporting events, and there are millions more events of varying sizes in myriads of sports in thousands of cities in hundreds of countries. Marketing and moneymaking in sports goes beyond and between events and permeates all aspects of the commercial culture – from fashions to food to music and films and to betting. Ronaldo’s purchase by Juventus was celebrated in Turin with a new ice cream flavour, a pizza named after him, and fans lining up to buy his fashion line shirt.

"It’s coming home" – football is coming home, is the chant of the English football fans, first started when England hosted the Euro in 1996 and revived this year as English hopesrose over the last two weeks after a surprising run by a very young English national team in the 2018 World Cup in Russia. England led by the legendary Bobby Moore won the World Cup for the first time and only time in 1966 when it also hosted the tournament. The hopes of winning again after 52 years were dousedlast Wednesday by Croatia, a country of four million people, who defeated England 2-1 in the second semi-final to clinch a place in today’s final. Croatia will play France, who got the better of Belgium in the first semi-final on Tuesday. This is Croatia’s first appearance in a World Cup Final, and France’s third. France, 1998 winner and 2006 runner-up, is the favoured team, but they will have to prove it later today in Moscow’s LuzhnikiStadium. The World Cup will be ‘coming home’ to either Paris or Zagreb, not London.

It should be an interesting, even riveting, final, as indeed the whole tournament has been – unpredictable, open ended, with extraordinary individual and team talents in full competitive display. The tournament favourites have fallen and gone one by one. Two giants of European and international soccer, Italy and Netherlands, did not even qualify to play in Russia. Reigning champions, Germany, could not go past the first round, finishing fourth in their group of four. Germany lost to Mexico in the opening game, squeezed out a last second victory against Sweden thanks to anawesome set-piece goal by Toni Kroos, but thoroughly imploded in the final group game going down 2-0 to plucky South Korea. The German team had all the great names but not the legs to match the younger usurpers. With Germany’s exit, the last four reigning World Cup champions have failed to pass the group stage while defending their championship title.

The South American teams after initial good showings also perished in the knockout stages, leaving the 2018 semifinals an all European contest – France v. Belgium and Croatia v. England.Brazil, the perpetual favourite,was done in by talented Belgium in the quarter finals. Brazil had earlier eliminated Mexico in the first knockout round. Uruguay could not maintain its early promise in the quarterfinals against France. France had seen off Argentina 4-3 in the first knockout round. That match was described by pundits as one of the great contests in World Cup history. It indeed was a great game, with Argentina putting up a strong show after its lack lustre performance in the group matches. Alas, it wasn’t enough for Argentina, previous winners in 1978 and 1986, to give its icon Lionel Messi, considered the greatest ever soccer player, another chance to win the game’s biggest prize. Argentina and Messi were the losing finalists to Germany in Brazil in 2014. It was a touching sight of sportsmanshipand camaraderie after the game to see every member of the young French team hugging Messi with empathy and respect. Messi’s torch, it is said, has now been passed to Frances teenage sensation at this World Cup, KylianMbappé, one of the many French players with African roots.

The other and the more self-promoting all time soccer great, Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal began with a hat trick in the drawn group game against Spain. Portugal was eliminated by Uruguay in the knockout stage, but that did not stop Ronaldo from upstaging the World Cup in Russia with his inter-club self-trading elsewhere in Europe – selling himself out of Spain’s Real Madrid club after nearly a decade with them and buying into Juventus in Turin, Italy, for a pricy sum of $130 millionon a four year contract. Big money dominates big sports. And the commercialization of sports as mass entertainment is now an integral part of global capitalism.And bigger the event or organization more fertile they are for corruption to sink roots and thrive.The World Cup is the pinnacle of all commercialized sporting events, and there are millions more events of varying sizes in myriads of sports in thousands of cities in hundreds of countries. Marketing and moneymakingin sports goes beyond and between events and permeates all aspects of the commercial culture – from fashions to food to music and films and to betting. Ronaldo’s purchase by Juventus was celebrated in Turin with a new ice cream flavour, a pizza named after him, and fans lining up to buy his fashion line shirt.

Sports stars are bigger celebrities than film stars and the big names in sports have huge social media followings. And major sports have become the new religions of capitalism, if not quite the opium of the masses. The moralists on the left insist it is, and call it a new form of social control and a modern day projection of Darwinian competition. Sports stadiums and events are interpreted as current versions of the old Roman colosseums, where gladiators fought, and slaves were forced to fight themselves or animals unto death in front delirious crowds. New sports stadiums are indeed the arenas where state agencies and corporations meet to squander and pilfer public money. But society’s interest in modern sports preceded the current phases of commercialization, globalization and corruption, and sporting events from the time of ancient Greece have been providing the stage for gifted athletes to excel and entertain quite positively their audiences with consummate skills and athletic feats. There have been copious displays of them at this World Cup. Ronaldo himself showed his greatness scoring off a free kick goal against Spain, kicking the ball on a trajectory that seemed to bend both along the curve and the tangent. England’s Kieran Trippier produced another peach of a free kick goal against Croatia that was remarkable for its precision as well as a thing of beauty. The poet Keats would have been proud.

Great athletes are now richly rewarded, as they should be, unlike their predecessors thirty years ago. They invariably become role models for children and younger players, many of whom make enormous sacrifices to become individual sports stars themselves. But the vast the majority of aspiring youngsters do not make the cut and find it difficult to readjust to normal life. So much so that Michael Jordon, his lofty ‘Airness’ of Basket Ball, when asked if he would consider himself a role model for African American children, he said his example was more a curse than a role model to them. Jordon said, he would rather have children pursuing normal careers as doctors or lawyers or accountants instead of burning themselves to become sports stars. Commercialization has also deprived sports of its educational usefulness in schools, as it used to be in the old days, for cultivating team spirit, role playing and leadership skills. On the other hand, commercialization of education has created non-state private schools that are veritable cram shops devoid of creative life and recreation.

Sports and Politics

Hitler, his name keeps coming up more frequently nowadays, tried to racialize sports during World War II. Jesse Owens, the African American sprinter, repudiated Hitler with a stellar performance winning four gold medals in the 1936 Berlin Olympics. There was also a German hero at the Olympics, long jumper Carl Ludwig (Luz) Long, who ignored Hitler and the instruction to win gold, by advising Owens who was on the verge of being disqualified for foul jumps in the first round, to jump from a foot behind the take-off board to qualify for the final round of jumps. Owens went on to win gold, Long settled for Silver but was the greater for it. The real story of Owens is that he returned to a formally welcoming but racially segregated America. The barriers of segregation would not start coming off for another fifteen or twenty years, and America’s racial innards were exposed to the world when American gold and bronze medalists in the 200-meter event at the 1968 Mexico Olympics, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, raised their fists from the medal podium in Black Power salute to their American flag and national anthem. Donald Trump, the present disruptor in chief, is exposing the remnant innards again by insisting that American footballers should stand up for the national anthem after some of them started going down on one knee to protest against police violence targeting Blacks.

The 2018 World Cup is remarkable for the racial blending of West European football teams. The Latin American teams have always been racially mixed, and the mostly monochromatic teams in Russia, are the few East European, the two Asian and the two African teams. Indeed, the French team has more Blacks than Whites and there is hoping in France that their team will win today to boost national unity. The English team includes more Blacks and Muslims than any time before, all of them sang God Save the Queen quite lustily, and they were also the more inconsolable after England’s loss to Croatia. The colour changes in team composition have been occurring over the last twenty years or so and they are in stark contrast to the teams that competed in 1966 when England won the World Cup.

1966 was the epicentre of the Sixties, the famed postwar decade for socio-cultural and political convulsions. 1968, the year of universal turmoil was still two years away. Charles de Gaulle was in power in 1966, and Croatia was not even a country – it was part of the Yugoslavian Federation under Josip Tito, the Croatian federalist who vowed that the Danube will flow backward before Yugoslavia could break up. Kennedy had come and gone by 1966. So had his counterpart Khrushchev in the Soviet Union, which seemed unassailable in the Cold War of that time. Paul VI was the Pope in the Vatican, the only Pope in history from the ranks of the (Milanese) bourgeoisie. Harold Wilson was Britain’s Labour Prime Minister. Pakistan was still under Ayub Khan’s military dictatorship, while Indira Gandhi became India’s Prime Minister in January 1966.

Sports as a cultural phenomenon, along with art, music, not to mention the mini-skirt and bell-bottoms, was intertwined in the political and cultural controversies of the day and the decades that followed. The English Team’s 1966 World Cup win against Germany was a factor in Labour’s election victory later that year, even as the same team’s defeat to the same German team in the 1970 World Cup in Mexico contributed to Labour’s defeat four years later. 1966 also precipitated healthy soccer rivalries, which also became the source of nationalist angsts, between England and Germany as well as between England and Argentina. Argentina mourned its loss to England in the 1966 quarter-finals, as the "robbery of the century." It would have its revenge twenty years later in the 1986 World Cup in Mexico, when Argentina defeated England 2-1. Diego Maradona scored both of Argentina’s two goals. The first was the infamous handball goal which Maradona famously explained as "the hand was the hand of God (Diego) and the foot was the foot of Maradona!" The second goal was best described by a salivating Scottish commentator on live television: Maradona took the ball in midfield and "ran through the entire English side to score the goal of the century."

England’s continuing lack of success in international football after 1966, especially its chronic inability to prevail in penalty shootouts, became a major source of national anguish and the rise of soccer hooliganism in England in the 1980s and 1990s came to be seen as a social consequence of Margaret Thatcher’s harsh and insensitive politics. England’s defeat to Germany in the 1990 World Cup semi-final penalty shootout in Rome, did not affect her politically. She is said to have quietened her cabinet ministers who were distraught about losing to Germany again in the game that England invented, by reminding them that "England defeated Germany twice this century in the game they invented." No minister would have had the courage to tell her that that she too played the war game against Argentina quite unnecessarily over Falklands. England wouldn’t risk a game with China over Hong Kong. Quite apart from football, England is now a house divided within itself and from its British constituent parts – over what to do with Brexit. An England-France final today would have Brexit written all over it. Never mind.

To end on a homeward note – 1966 was also the year when JR Jayewardene addressed the annual conference of the then Ceylon Association for the Advancement of Science (CAAS, now SLAAS), wherein he mused about an executive presidential (EP) system for Sri Lanka. Nobody took it seriously then and for a long after, until eleven years later, in 1977, JRJ won quite fortuitously a tyrannical majority in parliament to implement his idiosyncratic constitutional model for Sri Lanka. Thirty one years later, the debate is continuing as to whether the EP system should be maintained or modified. At the same time, candidates and potential candidates are lining up for the next presidential race, consulting astrologers and receiving ecclesiastical birthday blessings.

In the spirit of football, it is fair to ask where the current candidates were in 1966 and how many of them would have had any interest in politics, let alone the constitutional and a presidential system. Well, here is a list of facetious answers: Of the main contenders: only Chamal Rajapaksa could have been considered an adult in 1966; he was 27. Mahinda Rajapaksa, now disqualified, was breaking into his twenties. Ranil Wickremesinghe and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa were seventeen, and it is an open question which one of them would have been the terrible teen then, or now. The two political scions, SajithPremadasa and Namal Rajapaksa were not born in 1966. Last but not least, Mangala Samaraweera who apparently is being touted as a common yahapalanaya candidate for 2020 was an innocent ten year old in 1966. The prospecting of future presidential candidates would have been the last thing on JRJ’s mind when he addressed the CAAS in 1966.

THE DEATH PENALTY SERIOUSLY VIOLATES SEVERAL HUMAN RIGHTS INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO LIFE- HRCSL



Sri Lanka Brief14/07/2018

“The Human Rights Commission wishes to bring to Your Excellency’s and the Government’s
attention its recommendations regarding the abolition of the death penalty, which the
Commission views is imperative for Sri Lanka in recognition of the growing global recognition
that the death penalty seriously violates several human rights including the right to life and
freedom from cruel and inhuman punishmen| is an extreme and irreversible punishmenU and
is ineffective as a deterrent to crime. Sri Lanka should demonstrate its commitment to the
sanctity of life and fundamental human rights principles by joining the more than 100 nations
in the world that have abolished the death penalty thus far. Another 60 countries do not carry
out death sentences in practice.”

Read the full letter of the HRCSL to President Sirisena, dated  l January 2016:

RECOMMENDATION-TO-ABOLISH-THE-DEATH-PENALTY-IN-SRI-LANKA-E

Firstly corrupt prison officers should be hanged before prisoners dealing in drugs say law abiding officers ! Cabinet proposal not passed unanimously !!


LEN logo(Lanka e News -13.July.2018, 11.30PM)  The proposal made by the president that drug dealers should be executed by the hangman’s  noose is a damp squib said the honest law abiding officers of  the prison while adding , if the drug trafficking prisoners  within the prison are to be executed, firstly the corrupt officers within prison who are  aiding and abetting them should be hanged because these drug businesses are being carried out freely and with impunity by the prisoners with the support of these culprit officers.
The best illustration ….
It has come to light the mastermind behind the drug trafficking in the 103 kilos haul of heroin which was seized recently isTharmaraja Susendran alias Suse .The latter who is already in the death row following death  sentence meted out to him based on heroin trafficking charges , has filed an appeal against an earlier verdict .President’s proposal to execute drug  traffickers of course emerged as a popular solution to the heinous crime.
Suse is the closest assistant of Samantha Kumara alias Wele Sudha . Because Wele Sudha has no knowledge of English , his international transactions are handled  by Suse. Until yesterday (12) Wele Sudha and Suse had been in two different cells within prison- Wele Sudha in C3 and Suse in L hall. This precluded them from  meeting frequently. It is common knowledge that these two dealers carry on drug transactions in collaboration.  Despite his on the 11 th , Wele Sudha and Suse were put in the same YO cell meaning that the two drug traffickers can  now plan as well as carry out their drug dealings together most successfully .
Believe it or not , it is the corrupt criminal prison officers who had helped these two drug barons to carry on their criminal activities without any hindrance. Hence the law abiding prison officers insist that it is these corrupt prison officers aiding and abetting these heroin magnates in prison who should be executed first and foremost .

Cabinet proposal ratified unanimously is a lie…

Meanwhile the story that the cabinet proposal of the president in this connection to re introduce death sentence by execution was passed unanimously is a lie, based on reports. This mendacious report has been concocted by the media coolies who are pampering the president and pandering to his dubious agendas. Mangala Samaraweera , Rajitha Senaratne and Field Marshal Fonseka have opposed the proposal to implement death sentence by execution, while  the Prime Minister has not expressed his consent.
At the same time the SI who nabbed the culprits in this massive 103 kilos heroin haul has been driven into a deep quandary. That is he is threatened with demotion instead of being granted a promotion. This is due to the conspiracy of the superior officers in the Narcotics Bureau at the time of seizing of the drug haul, based on reports..
We shall expose these conspiracies and treacheries via another report.
---------------------------
by     (2018-07-14 00:26:08)

Sri Lanka: The “Noble Land” of the world where religious leaders sanitise licensed “murder”


Drug menace is certainly growing and growing fast too and has to be completely eradicated. The question is how best it could be curbed, if not eliminated

by Kusal Perera- 
“Hitler massacred 03 million Jews….Now there are 03 million drug addicts….I’d be happy to slaughter them.” – Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte
( July 15, 2018, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) In the wake of President Sirisena announcing he would sign the death penalty for those who get involved in the drug trade while in prison serving a sentence, the Prisons Department has announced 02 vacancies for permanent ‘hangmen’ to be filled. President’s decision it is reported had been unanimously endorsed by the cabinet of ministers. Despite accepting collective responsibility Minister Rajitha Senaratne maintains he is personally against the decision. So did Minister Samaraweera who opposed capital punishment saying in no country has capital punishment deterred crime, went on to say, the big fish is not who are in the prisons, addressing a well attended media briefing. So was Deputy Minister Karu Paranavithana quoted in personal capacity as opposing the death penalty.
Meanwhile Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith representing the Roman Catholic Church that adamantly oppose abortions arguing for “right to (unborn) life”, spoke to the Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation
endorsing President Sirisena’s decision to re-introduce death penalty that denies “right to life”. Crimes must be duly punished and sentences should be carried through he said, endorsing the presidential decision for selective capital punishment. Perhaps Cardinal Malcom Ranjith wasn’t an invitee to the 25th anniversary of the promulgation of the catechism when Pope Francis addressed cardinals, bishops, priests, nuns, catechists and ambassadors from many countries on 11 October 2017, when the Pope said very firmly, “death penalty is contrary to the gospel, however grave the crime committed” and went on to explain his statement.
There is strong condemnation from the Joint Opposition as well with MP Dinesh Gunawardne very clearly saying imposing capital
punishment would not be a cure for the drug menace. Bar Association of Sri LankaL also took up a similar position, denouncing the presidential decision. When re introducing of capital punishment was being discussed and political dumb heads like Hirunika Premachandra claimed in October 2015 she would with the support of another of her kind, Ranjan Ramanayake, bring an adjournment motion in parliament to re introduce the death penalty, Dr. Deepika Udagama as head of the SL Human Rights Commission wrote to President Sirisena in January 2016 opposing capital punishment and saying ‘the death penalty should be substituted with periods of imprisonment commensurate with the severity of crimes concerned’.
Yet Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith believes he should stand with the President and is not alone with deputy prelate of the Malwatte chapter Ven. Dimbulkumbure Wimaladhamma thero and Secretary of the Malwatte chapter Ven. Medagama Dhammananda (Ph.D) thero also endorsing capital punishment demeaning Lord Buddha’s preaching not to take away another’s life (First of the five precepts ; promise to abstain from killing – Pāṇātipātā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
Drug menace is certainly growing and growing fast too and has to be completely eradicated. The question is how best it could be curbed, if not eliminated. In all countries where it grows as in Sri Lanka, one basic fact is, the law enforcement agencies are both inefficient and heavily corrupt. Political establishment too adds to it with covert patronage. In short, heavily corrupt societies provide fertile ground for drug peddling, big time dealing and trafficking. The express growth of drug addiction, peddling and bigtime business in drugs during the past decade or so in Sri Lanka is much proof of it. In fact, Sri Lanka came to be known as the latest hub for transhipment of hard drugs like heroin and cocaine, two of the most dangerous drugs in the world. Bigtime drug trafficking and competition for its monopoly is said and is held as reason for the long drawn out battle between Late Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra and former MP Duminda Silva convicted for murder. Very recent allegations by State Minister Wijayakala Maheswaran that with the conclusion of war in 2009 May, politicians were involved in transporting drugs to North and 03 years ago CM Northern Province Justice Wigneswaran highlighting the need to control and stop unrestricted entry of drugs into Northern Province and seeking help of Central Government authorities in curbing the drug menace, certainly paints a very disturbing picture.
In the South, over the past decade and more, drug addiction spread far and wide into rural areas and among school children too. According to the latest survey on drug related arrests by the National Dangerous Drugs Control Board (NDDCB), every district shows substantial presence of dangerous drugs while Colombo, Kalutara, Gampaha, Puttlam, Kurunegala and Anuradhapura show widespread drug abuse. In Puttlam there had been a very significant increase of arrests in April 2018, compared to March 2018, while in Kalutara, Galle, Matale, Kurunegala, Kegalle, Anuradhapura, Mannar, Mullaitivu, Trincomalee and Vavuniya have increased numbers in April, over March.
These numbers do not provide an accurate picture of the spread of hard drugs. It is common knowledge that arrests don’t take place regularly and in an independent manner. Under some police officers the crackdown begins ruthlessly and then dies down fast creating an impression everything had been brought under control, while some officers take it as just routine and is not made into “an issue”. In most instances and as general practice, it is drug users and addicts who are arrested with a “packet” or two and not the peddler in the area. Nor are “dealers and distributors” above the peddler tracked down. Yet, these numbers indicate the whole country is being swallowed up and the spread of hard drugs is an ever growing menace.
There is also a deviating tendency to project Cannabis as the most abusive drug and not other hard drugs like heroin, hashish, opium and numerous tablets that come with fancy names. The Drug Abuse Monitoring System (DAMS) Report of the NDDCB using numbers of drug addicts who received treatment and rehabilitation in the 03rd Quarter of 2017 shows Heroin and Opium as the more popular hard drugs in use. The same report says, street price of a packet of ‘one time use’ Cannabis during that period was around Rs.200 to 300, while that of Hashish or Heroin was around Rs.1,250 per packet.
Obviously, though the risk is high in trafficking hard drugs than transporting and peddling Cannabis, the profits are also extremely high with hard drugs. Thus, in a society where all systems have crashed with corruption and are greased by different mafias to roll over to their advantage, big time dealers decide priorities. Cannabis with lesser profits is therefore kept as most abusive and as a priority in curbing drug abuse with less importance given to hard drugs with big profits.
Piecing together most such information and inferences creates a terrifying picture that has politicians, law enforcement agencies, prison authorities and bigtime traffickers all working in tandem, creating a massive network that had never been broken into. That creates the possibility for those few who have been brought before the law and punished to be able to operate their own network, from within the prison cells. There is no doubt the prisons’ officialdom is as corrupt or more corrupt than most other State agencies and play an important role with prisoners who are big time dealers. Business from within prison cells is also possible, because law enforcement agencies don’t crackdown on dealer and distribution networks that have political interests at different levels, from “Pradeshiya Sabhas” to very high levels. As Minister Mangala Samaraweera told his media briefing, “Those in prison are only the second level drug dealers. The major drug dealers of this country are not in there. They are in Lions clubs. Rotary Clubs. In Buddhist organisations…..In a country where the police, the jury and the judge with drug dealers become one entity at times,…. if drug abuse can be curbed by death penalty, well, then its fine”
It is wholly irrational and naïve therefore to believe execution of the guilty would curb the drug menace and for a Head of State to declare those who continue their drug business even after being sentenced to prison, would be “executed”. This decision of the President in a way is extremely dangerous in a very corrupt system. In a system where money and politics not only could decide the “guilty” and the “innocent” but could also contract out the “death” of any person, another may decide as hindrance. This is more terrifying in our context where top police officials are implicated in murder and contract killing. It is therefore insane for religious leaders to sanitise this decision of the President that would mean licensed “murder” as decided by the President of the country.