Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, June 24, 2018

CANNOT ENTERTAIN ANY FURTHER UNDUE DELAYS IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM – TNA



Sri Lanka Brief23/06/2018

TNA leader Sampanthan says that ” We cannot entertain any further undue delays in this matter the draft Constitution must be presented to parliament and debated and upon receiving a two-thirds majority it should be approved by the people at a referendum he added.” He was speaking at the  meeting with the visiting Norwegian State Secretary for Development Cooperation Mr Jens Frølich Holte in Colombo. full statement issued by the TNA fellows:

(Press Release.21  June 2018) The visiting Norwegian State Secretary for Development Cooperation Mr Jens Frølich Holte met with the Tamil National Alliance Delegation led by the Leader of the Opposition and the Tamil national Alliance Hon R. Sampanthan yesterday (22.06.2018) at the Office of the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament.

Mr Sampanthan briefed the Secretary on the status of the political affairs in the Country. Mr Sampanthan appreciated the support and partnership extended by the Norwegian government in the past in rebuilding Sri Lanka especially in the area of a political solution to the national question.
Further, Mr Sampanthan briefed the Secretary on the efforts taken to frame a new constitution and said as representatives of the people we cannot throw away the opportunity that has come our way. Mr Sampanthan feared that any failure in this process will lead to further divisions among communities in the country. “ I am not ruling out the chances of having a new Constitution, but we are disappointed about the delays in the recent past in taking this process further. This government can achieve what they couldn’t achieve in the past if they are genuinely committed and have the political will do so Mr Sampanthan added. “ we have been governed without our will and consent, from 1956 onwards our people have repeatedly voted for a change in the structure of governance in this country. These democratic verdicts have been continuously ignored and rejected” Mr Sampanthan said. We are well within the international laws with regard to our demands for power-sharing said Mr Sampanthan.

Further the process of framing a new constitution has been there since 1988 and every successive government has worked on this he said. We cannot entertain any further undue delays in this matter the draft Constitution must be presented to parliament and debated and upon receiving a two-thirds majority it should be approved by the people at a referendum he added. The people who think on racial lines are not the majority in this country but unfortunately, they are heard more than the moderates but if the moderate forces work together in these matters, mustering a two-thirds majority and passing a Constitution is possible Mr Sampanthan said.

Responding to a question Mr Sampanthan said, we have not been given equal opportunities in terms of development and employment and our people are frustrated on the contrary if power is devolved then these socio-economic issues could be addressed more effectively and meaningfully he said.
Speaking on the release of lands in the North and East Mr Sampanthan said there had been progress in this regard but things can be speedily addressed given the fact that it has been over nine years since the war came to an end. Armed forces are cultivating in these lands and the crops are sold to the very owners of these lands which is harmful to achieve peace and reconciliation in this country he added. Mr Sampanthan brought to the notice of the delegation that people in several places in North and East are staging protests over Land, persons in custody and the Issue of Missing persons. These are matters that are of concern to our people and we want the international community to play an important role in finding solutions to these issues he added.

Mr Sampanthan also thanked the Norwegian government for their support towards Sri Lanka and requested Norway to continue the constructive engagement with Sri Lanka.

The Norwegian Delegation led by the State Secretary for Development Cooperation Mr Jens Frølich Holte comprised of HE Mr Thorbjørn Gaustadsæther, Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Ms Dagny Mjøs, Senior Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ms Kjersti Nordskog Nes, Senior Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ms Monica Svenskerud, Counsellor/Deputy Head of Mission. Along with the Tamil National Alliance Leader Parliamentarians M.A. Sumanthiran and Selvam Adaikalanathan also participated at the meeting.

UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: PUTTING THE US PULL OUT IN PERSPECTIVE



Last week’s decision by the United States to pull out of the UN Human Rights Council created ripples in Sri Lanka where the parting words of America’s top diplomat that the Council was a “cesspool of political bias” resonated strongly with politicians and bureaucrats aligned with former President Mahinda Rajapaksa who waged pitched battles in Geneva from 2009-2014, claiming victimisation and similar partisan bias by member states.

For ruling party politicians, the US pull out seemed to indicate that the Government could be ‘off the hook’ with regard to further interventions on its human rights record in Geneva. Claims are being made that Sri Lanka should abandon the resolution it co-sponsored at the UNHRC in 2015 and 2017, since a main sponsor of the resolution and the protagonist of moves to hold Sri Lanka to account at the Council since 2012 had quit the proceedings.

Yet, celebration about being let off in Geneva may be premature, even though the dynamics at the UNHRC will be undeniably altered when Sri Lanka faces its next big reporting session on its rights record in 2019, and progress is measured on the country’s implementation of UNHRC Resolution 30/1 which was adopted by consensus in September 2015. The resolution calls on the Government of Sri Lanka to implement its transitional justice programs, including an Office of Missing Persons, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, an Office of Reparations and a special court to investigate and prosecute allegations of gross human rights violations occurring during the war.

The US pull out from the UNHRC makes little difference to Sri Lanka’s obligations under the 30/1 resolution, for a multiple reasons. Firstly, the resolutions of 2015 and 2017 were co-sponsored by Sri Lanka, meaning that the country accepted the spirit and content of the draft and agreed in principle to implementing its recommendations. Both resolutions were adopted by the entire Human Rights Council, approved unanimously. Since the Lankan Government did not enter into agreements on reconciliation and justice with the US Government in particular, the absence of the US from the Council makes no legal or institutional difference to the country’s obligations to implement provisions of the resolution, experts with knowledge of the workings of the Council opine.
Secondly, the technical aspect of the US pull out is vital to understanding its impact on Sri Lanka and its continuing engagement with the UNHRC. Until last Tuesday, the US was one of 47 elected members of the UN Human Rights Council.

The 47 members are elected for staggered three year terms, on a regional group basis. The UN General Assembly, comprising all 193 member states of the UN elect the member states who occupy the UNHRC’s 47 seats. Thirteen of these seats are reserved for African states, 13 for Asia, six for Eastern Europe, eight for Latin America and the Caribbean and seven for the Western European and others group. The 47 member states represented in the UN Human Rights Council have a vote each. Sri Lanka has never been a member of the UN Human Rights Council but has been an active participant in UNHRC sessions since 2009, lobbying countries to vote against US sponsored resolutions, making interventions and attending high level sessions. Several states that sponsored resolutions on Sri Lanka since 2012 at the UN Human Rights Council were not elected members. All this really means, is that these states, including Sri Lanka which is not an elected member, could not vote on the resolution.

Any one of the 193 member states of the UN General Assembly can sponsor, co-sponsor and support country specific resolutions or any other resolutions floated at the Human Rights Council in Geneva. In theory therefore, even though the US is no longer a member of the 47 member Council in Geneva, it can continue to act as a main sponsor of resolutions on Sri Lanka, together with the UK, Montenegro and Macedonia who form the ‘core group’ on resolutions drafted on the human rights situation in the island. Experts point out that Israel, whose alleged mistreatment by the Human Rights Council was one of the key causes of the US Government withdrawal from the body, regularly engages with the Council. Israel has even co-sponsored resolutions – including AHRC 30/1 on Sri Lanka and its 2017 follow up.

All this notwithstanding, international civil society actors say the US leaving the Council clearly has political significance, and badly weakens the ability of the US to engage with Sri Lanka and the rest of the Council in the coming months on the implementation of the 2015 and 2017 resolutions on promoting reconciliation and accountability in the island nation and any follow up actions in March 2019.

Many in the US Government hope to continue to influence the Government to fulfill its obligations to the Council and its own people, but experts warn that this will be harder from outside the Council.

“It is particularly damaging that the reasons the US Government gave for leaving the Human Rights Council – for being hypocritical and biased, echo so closely criticisms that the previous Sri Lankan Government and many Lankan politicians in opposition and in the current Government have made about the Council’s engagement with and resolutions on Sri Lanka,” said Alan Keenan, Sri Lanka Senior Analyst for the International Crisis Group.

“The US withdrawal will have lasting damage and will strengthen governments and politicians across the globe who prefer to be left to their own devices, even when this involves violating the fundamental rights of their own citizens,” Keenan said.

But the desire of politicians across party lines to pounce on the US pull out of the UNHRC as grounds to abandon the Resolution is both unfortunate and ultimately self-defeating. Realistically, the roll-out of reconciliation measures, including the release of private land held by the military, the efforts to repeal and replace the Prevention of Terrorism Act, the establishment of the OMP and the recent cabinet approval for an office of Reparations may all stem from the Government’s obligations under the UNHRC resolution. But there is no denying that the clamour for these measures began at home, in the war-devastated districts of the north and east, and in the south, where activists were hunted and intimidated for daring to call on the Government to uphold human rights. When the Government failed to hear domestic pleas for reform and reconciliation, the struggle to set Sri Lanka’s human rights record straight took an international turn.

The premise of the call for abandoning the UNHRC resolution in the wake of the US pull out from the Council itself is therefore flawed. After three decades of devastating civil conflict and 60 years of ethnic strife, the desire for reconciliation should not have to be internationally prescribed. Reconciliation ‘for our own sake’, was the promise of the Yahapalanaya Government in September 2015, when then Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera won accolades internationally for his humble and heartfelt intervention at the UNHRC in Geneva, where he unveiled a blueprint for reconciliation and justice that would help Sri Lanka reckon with its violent past.

Salvaging Socialism: The Role Of The Architect

Ruwan Jayakody
logoArchitecture is the production of an idea, the physicality of which envelopes the lives of all who function within the interior and exterior spaces and fabrics of built environments comprised of various building types and construction projects including stationary human habitation forms, designed and constructed through heterogeneous processes. In addition, there is also the physical environment created by civil engineering. 
In seeking to better articulate this idea of architecture against the backdrop of a universal right to housing, it can be said that in the context of the role of the architect, the forager and the scavenger intersect. The forager rummages among the detritus while the scavenger scalps the carrion, both, for purposes of nourishment. 
In this context, dominated by urbanisation and globalisation, much has rightfully been made in architecture regarding the needs and plans of both, the client and the architect, as consumers:- concerning resources; services; the geographical and regional character of lands; locations and the placement of buildings; materiality and the adoption of materials including recyclable and biodegradable, recycled and second-hand items and materials, architectural salvage and reclaimed material, low-impact building materials, and man-made products including partially or completely synthetic ones; the practice of reusing and recycling; the biology of buildings; the origins of architecture; elements including structural components; languages; proportion; syntax; expressions; references; objectives; spatiality and structure; geometrics; sizes and scales; shapes; forms; patterns; models; systems; design methodologies; construction methods and techniques; the supervision of the construction of buildings; installations; estimations; cost accounting and management, purchase prices of building materials, energy and ecological costs, and social costs; the utilisation of energies and their flow; energy efficiency and self-sufficiency; cost-effective building; low energy or zero energy, and centralised energy; carbon neutrality; renewable energy for power generation; passive buildings; the use of technologies and computational techniques; traditions; norms; customs; practices; manifestations; motifs; styles or ways – national and international; theories; principles and philosophies; perceptions; perspectives; relationships; standards; consistencies; contemporariness; quality; liveability; trends; legislation; rules and regulations; building codes and controls; environmental and material sustainability; durability; feasibility; practicality; environmental friendly and green buildings; economic and organic looking designs; footprints – carbon and ecological; size and maintenance; waste management including disposal and rainwater collection; and environmental benefits; among a host of others. 
Yet combined with wealth, most of these concerns have become anachronisms symptomatic of a new breed of greed and the flaunting of temporarily acquired wealth. 
What are the roles of the contractors (clients) and the producers (architects) as members aspiring to the intelligentsia, in a country that purports to be a democratic, socialist republic? What ideas and concepts are to be communicated to the client through the architectural brief? What must they force humanity to see? 
Firstly, the architect as the creator of both order and beauty, must exercise restraint with regard to the client’s requirements. What is practiced in short however is that when there is the articulation of even the slightest offence taken by the architect at a wanton display of wealth or waste and the architect subsequently intends to save the client’s wealth, a very shaky premise by itself, such expression if articulated is almost never to prove a point concerning the economics of scale even though it is made out as such, but to instead make a point about the practice of architecture. 
It is fashionable to make a denouement of a certain brand of architecture, defined, venerated and even denounced under the umbrella terms of – modern regional architecture in the tropics, regionalism, tropical regionalism, Sri Lankan regionalism, neo-regionalism and/or new regionalism and tropical modernism – for it stinks of class and reeks of the monied; a faux world bloated from excess. It is an architecture of money for the monied, which is to be rejected and dismissed not just as elitist drivel whose beastly bellies (the interior design) are furnished and embellished by the semiotics of culture through expressions of cultured-ness masquerading and posturing as culture, which are mostly snobbish expressions of so called pseudo-bourgeoisie ‘high’ culture, an architecture bred for the rich by the rich, but also to be rejected and dismissed most importantly because it is a practice of architecture that is certainly not cognizant of the zeitgeist where most architecture is a case of constructing buildings of refuse for the refused by the refused, punctuated purposefully by the abject lack of historical value or interest and elements of style. 
A sense of taste or culture cannot be bought but can only be developed through genuine appreciation stemming from seeking to uphold the experimentation of modernism and its sensibility, and cultivating a sense of irreverence towards what followed it. 

Read More

Sri Lanka: Triple jeopardy

Where does that leave the country? Forget about war crimes. What about other crimes? After strenuously objecting to bringing in foreign judges, the country’s legal eagles have nothing to say in the face of copping out by Supreme Court judges whenever a matter involving Gotabhaya Rajapaksa is brought before them.

by Rajan Philips- 
( June 24, 2018, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It is the time for withdrawals in Trump’s America. It is the time of recusals in Sri Lanka. It is also the time when spiritual pontiffs commend Adolf Hitler as a role model to an aspiring presidential candidate. Left to themselves each one of the three distractions can harmlessly fizzle out. But they also have the potential to harmfully align with each other leading to a triple jeopardy for the rest of us. There are too many withdrawals going on in America, but the one that is making the most fuss here in Sri Lanka is the least consequential over there. America’s withdrawal from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva, which had been anticipated ever since Trump became President, was announced last week in Washington. But the President was nowhere to celebrate this withdrawal. He is in the throes of several others, mostly involving an immigration imbroglio at the US-Mexican border that the Trump Administration created to enthuse its base, but has since spectacularly blown up in its face.
So the honour of announcing the UNHRC withdrawal went to Nicky Haley, that accidental pop up on the international stage as Trump’s amateurish Ambassador to the UN in New York. In stilted language, she called the UNHRC “a cesspool of political biases” and a “hypocritical body” that “makes a mockery of human rights.” Ms. Haley has been the moving force behind the US withdrawal in Geneva. Trump has no time for UNHRC. He has been pre-occupied with the more dramatic withdrawals from the Paris Accord on climate change, the Iranian Agreement, and the international consensus on the status of Jerusalem. He is threatening to withdraw from North American trade agreements and is provoking tariff-slapping trade wars not only with China but also with neighbouring Canada and Mexico, and other western countries.
Trump has even questioned the rationale for the G-7 group of countries (US, UK, Germany, France, Japan, Canada and Italy) without Russia being part of it. He withdrew his signature to the joint communique after the recent G-7 summit meeting in Quebec, Canada. He was flying to Singapore for his summit meeting with Kim Jong-Un and wanted to show ‘strength’ to his North Korean counterpart by lashing out at Canada and the G-7. Trump didn’t need to show any strength in Singapore. It was a love-fest between him and Kim. Trump was more at home with the North Korean Chief than he has ever been with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The western interpretation and fear of Trump’s wild oddities is that he is deliberately upending the world order that the West put together after World War II. There are many things that are problematic with that world order but Donald Trump is hardly the person to provide a diagnosis, let alone cure it.
To alt-right ideologues like Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller, Trump is history’s vehicle to put America first, America right and America great. They do not care if along the way Trump builds his private empire and breaks all government rules. Trump sure knows his priorities, and it was not an accident that after at the press conference after the summit in Singapore, Trump was euphoric about North Korea’s beaches for building the world’s best hotels and condos. He sure would have broached the subject of building hotels and condos in North Korea while one-on-one with its sole decision maker. There might be Sri Lankans dreaming of a Trump tower in the Port City under a likeminded Sri Lankan President like Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. Between Trump and Hitler the dual citizen of America and Sri Lanka has his work cut out in emulating super role models. There is no place for human rights in Trump’s limited political vocabulary. That should be another common ground for those who are gloating over US withdrawal from the UNHRC.
The main reason for US government’s annoyance at the UNHRC is the agency’s dogged pursuit of Israel for its lopsided violation of the rights of Palestinians. While even the Obama Administration was not at all pleased with the UNHRC over Israel, the then State Department would not countenance withdrawing from the agency. In fact, it was revived during the Obama presidency. Equally, it would have been antithetical to Samantha Power or Susan Rice who were American Ambassadors under President Obama. Especially for Dr. Power, her political vocabulary was all about human rights. Nicky Haley brings none of Power’s scholarship, motivation or commitment to the UN. A former South Carolina Governor, she has Republican presidential ambitions after Trump. Appeasing the voluble Israeli lobby in the US is critical to her ambition and withdrawing from the UNHRC is prepayment for future political support. After Trump delivered Jerusalem to Netanyahu, Haley has done her mite in doing the withdrawal in Geneva.
The American withdrawal neither adds value to nor subtracts value from the UNHRC. The professionals working at the agency are qualified and committed individuals who have been trying hard to implement a global agenda on human rights without consensual political support from member states. As a result, the Council’s work and energies are pulled in different directions often targeting human rights violation inconsistently and even contradictorily. But no country is targeted if there are no human rights violations in that country. The agency’s problem is it does not target every violator country, and it targets some of them more so than others. The Rajapaksa government tried to do an end run on the agency and even tried to imitate Israel in Geneva. The present government swung around through 180 degrees and got nowhere. The hoping in many circles is that the Rajapaksa(s) will return and try to emulate both Trump, or Haley, and Netanyahu. Now one of them has even got the license to “be a Hitler.”
Where does that leave the country? Forget about war crimes. What about other crimes? After strenuously objecting to bringing in foreign judges, the country’s legal eagles have nothing to say in the face of copping out by Supreme Court judges whenever a matter involving Gotabhaya Rajapaksa is brought before them. To date, four Supreme Court judges have recused themselves from hearing a case involving Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, even though one of them issued the initial order preventing his arrest. As judges, it is reasonable to expect, they have good reasons for their recusal, but isn’t it unreasonable to leave the public indefinitely in the dark without knowing what on earth is going on? Apparently according to judicial norms, self-recusal should not be done lightly, and no case should be risked going unheard for want of non-recusing judges. Oftentimes, judges fight hard to stay in a case when one or both parties to the case do not want a particular judge to hear their case. Apparently, as well, if all the judges in a court were to declare conflicts of interest in one or more cases, then any or all of them can proceed to hear those cases. To use Nicky Haley’s description, when there is a cesspool of biases they might cancel each other in resultant rulings.
Talking about judiciary and the rule of law, there is no better place than America and no better time than now to witness all the likely tensions and tussles between the primeval assertion of power, personified by Trump, on the one hand, and the grinding persistence of those who talk law to power, on the other. The man who not only boasted but also believed that because he has money he could do anything and get away with it, is now finding out that it is not easy to do that as President of the United States. He may not be tried while in office and he likes the self-serving constitutional idea that he can pardon himself and others he chooses to, but he cannot stop the hounds of law taking turns and coming after him. In how many other countries, can this be said of their Heads of State, or even former Heads of State and their families?
The crisis of America is that no founding father anticipated a wrecking ball president to provide all the checks and balances to parry every wild swing of an elected wrecker in chief. But the biggest checks are coming from the people themselves. Trump still has a depressingly sizable segment of the American population behind him and whom he cynically manipulates to push an agenda that he himself does not believe but will push anyway as that is the only away to stay in power for a full first term and potentially a second term. He has no compunction musing about unlimited presidential terms in America just as now it is in China. But unlike in China or anywhere else, people protests are stopping Trump in his populist tracks. The American immigration system is a wholly broken system. But the way to fix it is not by inhumanly applying zero tolerance against unauthorized immigration and separating children from their mothers at the American border. That is what the Trump Administration tried to do and that is what it is now being forced to withdraw from.
The Trump presidency is a text book case of how an executive presidency can unravel and become dysfunctional. America will outlive the Trump presidency because it is too large a country to be smothered by a single megalomaniac, and it has historical traditions and institutional resilience to systematically fight back. No one in America wants Trump to “be a Hitler.” The Trump presidency is also an illustration of the inherent dangers of executive presidency that other political societies, much smaller and much weaker than America, can ill afford and must try to avoid. Sri Lanka has the option of: either, staying with the current presidential system and handing it over to someone who might not need much encouragement to “be a Hitler.” Or, modifying the presidential system and re-privileging old parliamentary system.
To the extent the example of Hitler has been elevated to a spiritual blessing, it is fair to ask why the recipients of that have not respectfully dissociated themselves from that advice even though it may have been more a figure of speech than a serious proposition. But even a figurative mention of a historical figure like Hitler is indicative of troubling sentiments in society. Not surprisingly, even this is being blamed on Ranil Wickremesinghe by his inveterate critics: it is all Ranil’s fault, they say; the longer he stays in politics the greater the risk of society folding into fascism. Seriously, the onus is on the Rajapaksas to assert their dissociation from fascism or any other authoritarian contraptions and give the assurance that they stand for a democratic system in which people elect their representative to serve constitutionally limited terms.

Dollar Supply


JUN 24 2018

Foreign investments in the Government Securities Market (GSM) plunged to a 34-week low of Rs 298,858.48 million in the week ended Wednesday, thereby keeping up depreciative pressure on the rupee.

A figure lower than this was last achieved in the week ended 10 October 2017, when investments in the GSM totalled Rs 298,765.33 million. Such low investments are due to continuous foreign exits from the GSM, which in the eight weeks to Wednesday alone amounted to Rs 25,168.60 million, equivalent to US$ 158.96 million, thereby keeping up pressure on the rupee.

Those exits are caused due to the recovery of the US economy signified by rising rates in the world’s largest economy, therewith attracting such investments back to the USA, where such investments are generally US-based, finding comfort in investing in US-based assets rather than on Sri Lankan-based assets.

A depreciated rupee causes pressure on the cost of living and inflation leading to politico-socio-economic instability in the country, reflected by the rout the Government suffered under the hands of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s fledgling political party the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna, which, only after 15 months of its founding, swept the 10 February Local Government polls.

Matters have been compounded by exporters holding on to their US dollar proceeds without converting them to rupees on expectations that because of this uncertainty there is room for the rupee to depreciate further.

As it’s, islandwide inflation which had been on a decelerating trend since November, reversed gear last month, accelerating to 2.1 per cent, from 1.6 per cent in April, on a year-on-year (YoY) basis.

The reasons behind the acceleration in inflation were the recent increases in the administered prices of milk food, gas and petroleum fuels, all of which are imports, suffering under the impact of a depreciated rupee, coupled with the direct and cascading effects of such price increases in other relevant sectors of the economy.

On a month-on-month basis, the increase in inflation was sharper, increasing from 0.1 per cent in April to 1.1 per cent last month.

Further, the monthly change in all items in the inflation measurement basket shot up from a low of Rs 6.93 in April, to Rs 454.05 last month, with the sharpest change seen in the food and non-alcoholic beverages basket which price changes increased from a negative of Rs 41.62 in April to a positive of Rs 215.28 last month.

Meanwhile, the price changes of non-food items in the inflation measurement basket such as bus fares, included under the transport category increased sharply from Rs 48.54 in April to Rs 239.57 last month.

In a desperate measure to shore up the rupee, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka and the Government of Sri Lanka are using instruments such as moral suasion and selling dollars from the country’s foreign reserves. The latest ploy it used was by getting a private bank to sell dollars at discounted prices to the market on Friday.

As a result, the benchmark ‘spot’ which closed Thursday stronger at Rs 159.60/70 to the US dollar in two-way quotes in the interbank foreign exchange market sank to the Rs 159.80 level in the morning on Friday.
However, further depreciative pressure was reined in, after this private bank intervened in the market, offering the greenback at a discounted price of Rs 158.80/90 levels to the dollar, at which price the ‘spot’ closed yesterday, a strengthening of 80 cents over its previous day’s close, but at the expense of the foreign reserves holdings of that private bank in question.

Despite these measures, YoY as at yesterday the ‘spot’ has fallen by Rs 5.70 (3.72 per cent) and the country’s foreign reserves, last month over April by $ 1,166.76 million (11.74 per cent) to $ 8,769.01 million, in part due to the rupee protection, according to latest data.

What the Government needs to do is to get dollars to the market to get over this morass. Simple things like making the bureaucracy exporter friendly and the truth of former President J. R. Jayewardene’s statement, ‘Let the robber barons come,’ make sense in these desperate times to ensure politico-socio-economic stability in the country.

VOICES FROM THE RIOT RAVAGED DIGANA, SRI LANKA: THE IMPORTANCE OF INTER-ETHNIC UNDERSTANDING


Sri Lanka Brief23/06/2018

(20 JUNE 2018, INFORM) Since the anti-Muslim violence ravaged Digana and other areas around Kandy in March, INFORM, Human Rights Documentation Centre has been following developments, including through a finding mission, during which the team was able to listen to number of diverse opinions, which included affected Muslims, Sinhalese, opinion makes, clergy, human rights officials and political activists.

Violence against the Muslims in Digana erupted on 5th May 2018, spread like a wild fire for next two days and sporadic incidents took place till 9th May 2018. Although the violence for most part remained within the Kandy district, few anti- Muslim violence were reported from far away districts too.

The anti-Muslim violence in Digana is not an isolated incident.

According to Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, in their correspondence to the President and the Prime Minister dated 7th March, 2018, similar incidents occurred during November, 2017 and February, 2018 in Ginotota in Southern Province, Ampara in the Eastern Province, reflect a pattern of violence based on religious hatred1.

All of these three incidents have occurred during a period of four months. Both Kandy incident in March, 2018 and Ginota incident in November, 2017 were escalated after traffic accidents which led to clashes between groups belonging to Muslim and Sinhala ethnicities. The Ampara incident escalated with the accusation that a certain Muslim owned restaurant has added sterilization pills into the food sold to the Sinhalese customers. There was misconceptions being spread for a long time by Sinhala nationalist groups that Muslims add sterilization chemicals into food, underwear, and medical products etc. sold to the Sinhalese.

One week after the incident in Kandy, an NGO working on HIV/AIDS under GFATM (The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria) in Galle District, of Southern Province was accused of using sterilization medicine against the youth. The organization was raided by the villagers, media with the support of Police, and some allies of the organization who came to intervene were physically beaten by the villagers at the presence of media2.

Again one month after the incident in Kandy, in April, there were number of hateful discussions in social media about a Muslim person winning at the traditional Sinhalese – Tamil New Year Prince Competition conducted by a television channel.

The most common factor emerging from our discussions at Digana and areas affected by the communal violence is the lack of mutual understanding among the two main ethnic groups, i.e. Sinhalese and Muslims living in the area. Both sides have their own grievances but very strongly believe that only way forward is the peaceful co-existence based on mutual respect and understanding.

In a clear contrast to the peoples urge for more understanding and remedial measures the government has not taken any substantial steps in this direction after the ethnic violence came to an end. Since the local government election defeat, the government has been embroiled in conflict of two coalition partners, their presence at the grass root level diminishing.

One leading Sinhalese political activist belongs to the ruling party lamented that the government has washed its hands and allowed the police force to manage the situation. He was of the opinion that ruling parties are loosing credibility among the majority Sinhalese community, which in turn polarised the situation further.

In all the areas affected by the violence, political formation led by former president Rajapaksa won the local authority elections held one month before the incidents and seems to be actively behind the Sinhalese mobs who attacked the Muslims. The government’s inaction on bringing both communities to reconciliation platform has made the situation worse and given the ethnic polarisation to a political dimension.

A leading monk of the area, who played a leading role in diffusing the tensions and was able to keep his area violence free, told the INFORM team that child mortality rates are exceptionally high in the villages in the proximity where people buy their groceries from Muslim shops. It seems he too believes the story but no substantial evidence is provided. He warned that if by an accident if Sinhalese find any pill, even anything resembles a pill there will be riots, in the area. While he was emphatically expressing these fears to INFORM team number of villagers too were listening to him. They all were in agreement with the monk on increasing child mortality rate.

This narrative too contribute to the widespread notion that Muslims are hell-bent on reducing Sinhalese and Tamils population, while they keep expanding their population.

But at the same time the Monk said that he will not allow any ethnic violence in the area. He emphasised the need for mutual understanding. Politicians come and go when and incident happens, but there are no fellow up action, he said.

When we inquired from a Muslim person, who was explaining how the mob attacked their mosque in the presence of police, what is the reason in his opinion for the stories of Muslims trying to make other communities infertile, he raised his voice and said “May be it is because they are not able to produce more children, it is their problem, see I have produced 5 children!”

He was angry and feeling let down by the government. The mosque he prayed has been burned. While we were there within the burned Mosque a religious teaching for male children was on going.
Muslims are unanimous on the police inaction to bring the situation under control during the the height of the riot. They refute the story that it only the mobs came from other areas engaged in violence. Number of Muslims told us that they recognised the youth form their vicinity engaging in violence. This too makes the reconciliation between the two communities pivotal.

That the attackers had been waiting for an opportunity to unleash the violence against the Muslims was the opinion of well known Sinhalese political and social activists of the area. They grabbed the incident of death of a Sinhalese, after he was beaten by group of intoxicated Muslim youth. They had mobilised mobs in quick time. Their organising capacity is high, supported by charismatic extremist Buddhist monks. Even the police top brass knew one of the leading extremist Sinhalese personally, so that he could call him on the phone. His wife has told the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka that a Deputy Inspector General of Police asked him to come and diffuse the situation. The extremist setup called Mahason Balakaya which mobilised mobs through its face book page to unleash the violence had been known for making death threats against rights activist in Kandy, we were told.

As the Sinhalese expresses their discontent of increasing islamisation of Sri Lankan Muslims, a leading Muslim opinion maker told us that changes taking place within the Sri Lankan Muslim community is a welcome sign of spirituality. In his opinion adopting Arabic black style abaya and face veils by women and the thawb by men shows a higher level of Islamic spirituality. He himself has changed to thawb as his dress. This position in turn may be used to discredit the Muslims who do not adopt Arabic style dresses.

A human rights official told us that although there is video evidence of a monk shouting in a way inciting the Sinhalese, at a higher officer of the Teldeniya police station, the monk has not even been questioned. Number of Muslims too raised the same issue that not a single Monk has been arrested or questioned.

The fact that neither police nor the armed forces were able or willing to contain the anti-Muslim riots and the extremist monks enjoy complete immunity poses a very serious question: in the case of anti-Muslim riots erupting on a larger scale with the backing of large number of Buddhist monks what will be the government response? Will it be able to keep its command over the security forces or will there be a large scale violence against Muslims?

There has not been consistent follow-up of the reconciliation process in the area after the riots and even on a national scale. Seclusion has become norm instead of integration. Misconceptions on and antipathy towards Muslim community remains. Extremist social media campaigns are still ongoing. Anti- Muslim sentiments could easily turn into a volcanic explosion if the far reaching remedial measures are not taken involving all communities living in the country.

2 See Video : Ada Derana, Lunch time News on 19th March 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPgX1ZWQ3LQ   (12:42 to 15.46 Minutes).

-Inform Human Rights Centre, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
The Sunday Times Sri LankaSunday, June 24, 2018
On a visit to Myanmar last year, reputed Buddhist lay leaders who disapproved of incendiary anti-minority rhetoric engaged in by nationalist monk U Wirathu, were emphatic in their conversations with me that, ‘making him a martyr of the State’ would be the best possible media boost that he could get.
‘Marginalising him is a far better way to dilute the messages of hate that he preaches’ they opined. That was just prior to Myanmar’s State Sangha Maha Nayaka Committee prohibiting him from speaking for one year after determining that his statements had the potential to cause hatred and riots in the country.
Dangers of rabble-rousing rhetoric
That ban had little effect however as the monk continued his tirades, speaking of ‘marauding” Muslims even as the Rakhine people fled the country in what is now ranked as among the worst humanitarian crises of the decade. Surrounded by young men dressed in white and speaking softly in an odd contrast to the dark menace of what was articulated, he went on to label his critics as “terrorists”, openly mocking attempts to rein him in. Earlier this year, the one year ban lapsed but his followers had increased.
Where rabble-rousing religious rhetoric is concerned, some aspects of Myanmar’s turbulence are evidenced in Sri Lanka though there are noticeable departures. Up to this point at least, the Buddhist populace in Sri Lanka has kept both its good sense and its maturity by rejecting inflammatory outbursts of mischief makers. It is hoped that the same equanimity would prevail in regard to the antics of the Bodu Bala Sena outside the Homagama Magistrate’s Court.
As its Secretary, Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thera was released on bail following the conviction of threatening and intimidating Sandhya Ekneligoda during a habeas corpus hearing into the disappearance of her husband, black flags adorned Colombo and posters proclaimed the need to rise up against threats to Buddhism. These are not reassuring developments in any sense.
Need to acknowledge ground realties
That said, it must also be pointed out that refusal to acknowledge the complexities of growing tensions between the Buddhist majority and the Muslim minority in this country only contributes to the problem. Myopia on the part of a few ensconced in ‘projects on reconciliation’ and churning out conference papers and the like ignore the fact that these interventions, often circulating in select circles, have negligible impact on ground realities. And to be clear, by referring to the importance of engagement with affected communities, I do not mean donor funded efforts but actual social mobilization in the style of India’s famed civic action movements.
One example of this myopia for example was a response that I received to a column (An unhappy Lanka and an unfortunate people, Sunday Times, March 11, 2018) written after recent violence in Kandy which had reflected on a conversation with a fellow passenger when returning to Sri Lanka, where he had commented on the growing insularity of Muslim communities in his village in Mawanella. I was asked with considerable angst by my email interlocutor as to why I had reproduced this conversation ‘uncritically’ with the inference being that this was someone from an economically ‘privileged’ position (apparently based on the fact that he was engaging in air travel).
My response was that, far from being ‘uncritical’, that same column had also referred to devastation caused by the post 2009 entrenching of the Sinhala Buddhist majority mindset and the resultant deficit of trust between communities. Further that, far from being ‘privileged’, my conversationalist was someone from the village who had undertaken post graduate studies on a scholarship and was returning to his country to work in the sciences. And that his view was articulated more with a sense of sadness than vitriol.
Greater sagacity should prevail
This response to what was articulated in these column spaces says much about the inability to engage in critical thinking. Certainly that lack of foresight does not bode well for the upheavals that lie ahead. The call made by a senior monk of the Asgiriya Chapter to former Defence Secretary, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa to the effect that if he is called a Hitler, then he should ‘be a Hitler and build the country’ is telling of what may be in store. Quite apart from the scant logic in this statement, since Adolf Hitler of the Third Reich was known more for destroying Germany than building it, this airy brushing aside of its atrocities is stupefying. Later attempts by the Asgiriya monk to downplay what was said, added to the monumental faux pas, if that can be so termed.
Greater sagacity should surely prevail on the part of the learned monks of the Malwatta and Asgiriya monastic establishments as opposed to the contortions of the BBS. But as grotesquely misplaced as the reference to Hitler was, this has been propelled by well-aimed charges of ‘leaderless’, ‘rudderless’ and ‘directionless’ leveled against the Unity Government. Its quarreling leaders, President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Ranil Wickremesinghe should accept full responsibility for that indictment. Mercifully, there appears to be a toning down of the hostility at least on public platforms.
But that is not enough. Determined leadership should practically address the looming political, social, religious and communal chaos. Absent that determination, it is uncertain as to whether Sri Lanka will survive, even in its flawed Republic-state.

Police seek villagers who beat leopard to death 





June 23, 2018, 8:16 pm

AFP – Sri Lankan authorities were seeking Friday nearly a dozen men who beat a leopard to death after it strayed into a village and attacked people, a minister said.

Wildlife deputy minister Palitha Thewarapperuma said police were deployed to arrest those responsible for Thursday’s animal killing, which was captured on mobile phones and shared on social media.

"It is sickening to see these images," Thewarapperuma told parliament. "We are taking action to arrest all those responsible for this extreme cruelty."

Wildlife officials had been alerted to the leopard’s intrusion into a village in Kilinochchi 330 kilometres (210 miles) north of Colombo on Thursday morning, but they were beaten and chased away by the locals, he said.

"Our officers were trying to tranquilise the animal and take it away, but the villagers did not allow them to do their job and instead killed the leopard," the minister said.

He said 10 people injured by the leopard had been admitted to a local hospital.

Leopards are protected animals in Sri Lanka and they are also in the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of endangered animals.

Harming leopards in Sri Lanka is punishable by jail terms up to five years. The wild population of leopards on the island is estimated at fewer than 1,000.

Six people were jailed in March 2016 after posting photos online showing them skinning a sea eagle alive.

Two Sinharaja elephants will suffer same fate as the leopard: Thewarapperuma


2018-06-23

The two elephants in the Sinharaja forest will suffer the same fate as the leopard which was killed recently if they remain in the Sinharaja forest, Wildlife Deputy Minister Palitha Thewarapperuma said yesterday.
Wildlife Minister Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka and Deputy Minister Thewarapperuma initially attempted to take the two animals out of the forest reserve but President Maithripala Sirisena stopped them from doing it, he said.
Deputy Minister Thewarapperuma said this during an adjournment debate moved by Joint Opposition MP Wimalaweera Dissanayake who urged the government to resolve human- animal conflicts.
“The villagers are planning to kill the two elephants and therefore they will suffer the same fate as the leopard which was killed recently. This is why Minister Fonseka and I decided to take them to an elephant transit home. We were going to keep the two animals in the transit home temporarily,” the Deputy Minister said.
“We went into action even without veterinary specialists and had to get the two from Sri Lanka Air force. President Maithripala Sirisena who called us as soon as we started the operation to transfer the elephants advising us to do it carefully. However seconds later the Air Force Commander informed us that the President had ordered the two air force specialists to leave the place. The President also called us soon after and advised us to tie the two elephants and keep them,” he said.
Mr. Thewarapperuma said the two animals will be kept in a hundred acre land within the Sinharaja. “Both Minister Fonseka and I will personally attend to the needs of these animals,” he added.
He revealed that villagers in Kalawana tortured the mother of the two male elephants which he and his minister tried to move.
The Deputy Minister stressed on a joint effort to resolve the human animal conflicts. He said politics has prevented resolving this conflict. “The human animal conflict had become a national issue because of politics,” he said. (Yohan Perera and Ajith Siriwardana)

Maximum punishment for those involved in killing leopard – Thewarapperuma 




Legal action would be taken against all those who were involved in killing a tiger that had come to the village in Killinochchi – Ambalkulam area says the Deputy Minister of Wildlife and Regional Development Palitha Thewarapperuma.

Deputy Minister Palitha Thewarapperuma says wildlife officers who had visited a village on receiving information that a leopard had come to the village had been attacked by villagers and several of them had to be admitted to hospital. Later, when, with the assistance of the STF, the Wildlife officers were moving to the village to capture the leopard, the residents had assaulted the leopard with stones and poles and had killed it.

The culprits involved in the incident have been identified and legal action would be taken against them according to the Wildlife Ordinance said Mr Thewarapperuma.

“All Are equal But Some Are More Equal Than Others” In Sri Lanka (With Apologies To George Orwell)
















logo


Lukman Harees
‘The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make decisions independent of the political winds that are blowing’– Caroline Kennedy (US)
While following the many developments in this so-called Dharmadweepa in the administration of justice, my mind races towards the well –known novella by George Orwell- which although an ostensibly a fairy story of farm animals, was really a thinly veiled allegory for the (Trotsky/Stalin) Soviet Union. The animals are led by a pair of pigs, Snowball (Trotsky) and Napoleon (Stalin), who lead a rebellion against the human owner of the farm. The animals successfully drive him out and establish Animal Farm. They agree to adopt the Seven Commandments of Animalism as their constitution. The most important of these is the last commandment: “All animals are equal.”
Napoleon runs Snowball off the farm and gives himself full leadership. He gradually violates more and more of the commandments as his behaviour becomes increasing like that of their previous human master. The climax comes years later when the animals spot Napoleon walking on his hind legs while carrying a whip (violations of the commandments) and discover that all the commandments have been reduced to simply “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”. Logically, this quote is nonsensical. To be equal means to be exactly the same, so there cannot be more or less equal. You are either equal or unequal. What it however symbolizes is the open admission that the ideals of social justice and equality that inspired the animal’s revolution will never come to fruition.
This quote aptly captures the drama revolving round Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thero’s (GST) jail sentence and subsequently letting him off on bail. It was not just a comical stroke of justice in this fast failing state of Sri Lanka, but also sends  dangerous signals to the country that rogues and thugs in politics and saffron robes will and can continue to act with impunity and enjoy immunity from the process of justice; all they need is state patronage and some pressure from those in the saffron class- a powerful class which has been parading in the corridors of power ever since SWRD was voted into office (although lessons are not learnt when SWRD himself fell a victim to a bullet by rogues members of that same class!). This saga indeed lends truth to what George Orwell showed in this famous novel. Yes! “All Are equal but some  are more equal than others” in fairy tale Sri Lanka.
This hardline rogue monk  was incidentally found guilty of having threatened the woman activist Sandya Ekneligoda, who was seeking justice for her husband who mysteriously disappeared during MR time. In 2016, GST interrupted a court hearing over the abduction of this journalist, Prageeth Ekneligoda, in which military intelligence officials were accused. He shouted at the judge and lawyers because the military officials had not been allowed bail, and threatened Ekneligoda’s wife in filthy language. So, the Magistrate Udesh Ranathunga recently sentenced the monk to two terms of six months in jail, to be served concurrently, as well as a fine of 1,500 rupees, and a payment of 50,000 rupees as compensation to his wife Sandya. GST also faces a separate contempt of court case over the same incident. When, he was put behind bars, there were wide discourses all over the country initiated by the top hierarchy in the various chapters about the permissibility of disrobing this monk in jail and getting him to don a jumper. This concern was interestingly not shown when many other rogue Bikkhus were arrested and jailed for numerous offences. 

Read More