Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, June 9, 2018

‘Don’t ever step into this house. Go and sleep with Lanka e News fellows,’ president shouts and chases doctor for disclosing his mental disorder..!


LEN logo(Lanka e News – 08.June.2018, 11.30PM) After Lanka e News always first with the news and best with the views reported on the mental disorder  of president Gamarala on the  2nd , the president has scolded his personal doctor Mangala in the  most filthiest and foulest language, and chased him out ,  based on reports  reaching Lanka e News.
“Never step into this house , not even come into the precincts. Now you can go and sleep with the Lanka e News fellows” Gamarala in a fit of rage had shouted at him. Dr.Mangala of course knowing very well Gamarala is a mental patient has understood Gamarala’s conduct is a manifestation of symptoms of his mental illness, and has been unperturbed . Yet having no other option he had gone away without treating the patient.
Thereafter, a  team of doctors of the army has been appointed as president's medical personnel. The doctors attached to the army hospital will be treating the president based on a roster during the week days.. They will also be travelling with him. 

Chaturika fetches an extraordinary motivator…

However , as a solution is not being found for Gamarala’s mental disorder by the doctors of the forces , Chathurika his daughter has  found another motivation trainer  to buoy up the patient’s mood . He is one who was recruited to the presidential secretariat as a director.
Chaturika and family members have taken steps to make the president meet this motivator every once in two days , several hours in the night and one hour in the morning. This motivator though he is good at elevating the mood of sportsmen and sportswomen , has no capacity to treat Alzheimer’s disease or depression. Dr. Mangala his former doctor had however confirmed the president is suffering from these two mental defects.

Media ethics or a Nation endangered ?

Meanwhile some have  leveled accusations against Lanka e News  that the president’s mental illness should ought not to have  been reported  and that  revelation is a breach of media ethics. 
Of course we do acknowledge that reporting the illness of a patient is unethical , but when  the patient is a president of a country , and by concealing his mental condition ,  if  owing to his conduct the whole country is imperiled  , should that single individual or an entire nation of 20.5 million people  be given preference   ?
Lives of 20.5 million people in jeopardy or safeguarding reputation of a mental patient on grounds of media ethics? It is for you to decide

Chandrapradeep

Translated by Jeff

Connected report


---------------------------
by     (2018-06-08 19:27:02)

Scandal at South Eastern Uni Lecturers seeking sexual favours-Wijeyadasa


BY Methmalie Dissanayake-JUN 09 2018

An astounding revelation has been made by a senior Minister that certain lecturers at a University in the East were demanding sexual favours from female undergraduates in exchange for better grades.
Minister of Higher Education, Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe yesterday (8), said complaints have been received that several lecturers at the South-Eastern University of Sri Lanka in Oluvil, have demanded sexual favours from female students.

Dr. Rajapakshe brought it to the notice of Parliament during yesterday’s sittings and said that many complaints from undergraduates and their parents have been received alleging that a lecturer was seeking sexual favours in return for undergraduates to pass examinations.

Let’s make it a blessing for the country

 2018-06-09

Legal Provisions available for Sri Lankan Women, involved in political space   
In terms of the Article 12(2), Chapter III on fundamental rights in the 1978 Constitution of Sri Lanka, the State pledges to ensure that no citizen shall be discriminated against on the grounds of disability, race, religion, language, caste, sex, political opinion and occupation.   

Karandeniya PS Deputy Chairman shooting incident: Suspect arrested


Saturday, June 9, 2018 

A motorcyclist who is said to have shot Deputy Chairman of the Karandeniya Pradeshiya Sabha Donald Sampath was arrested by the Police while receiving treatment at the Uragasmulla Hospital this morning.
The Deputy Chairman was shot dead by two unidentified gunmen who rode a motorcycle in Keenewa, Korakeena on Thursday.

Karandeniya PS Deputy Chairman killed

Friday, June 8, 2018
Deputy Chairman of Karandeniya Pradeshiya Sabha Donald Sampath of Sri Lanka Podu Jana Peramuna  was killed in shooting in Keenewa in Korakeena in the Uragasmanhandiya Police division yesterday night.
Police media division said that the victim was travelling in a vehicle when he was shot at by two  unidentified gunmen who came in a motorcycle.  the vice chairman died on the spot following the shooting and his body has been kept at Boralanda hospital
Another individual who was injured in shooting has been admitted to Boralanda hospital.  Uragasmanhandiya police is conducting further investigations .

Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 07:19 pm SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.


Lankapage LogoJune 09, Colombo: Two members of an underworld gang were killed when they exchanged fire with the Police Special task Force (STF) during a raid in Madawala area in Wattegama, Kandy this afternoon (09).

According to information received that a, underworld criminal is arriving in the area, the STF has launched a search operation in the area setting up road barriers.

The two suspects who had arrived in a luxury vehicle had shot at the police and the police had returned fire.

Two underworld gangsters were killed and another was admitted to the Wattegama hospital, police sources said.

Two firearms were found in the car.


Police media Spokesman SP Ruwan Gunasekara says that these two criminals are the main actors of the two underworld leaders Makandure Madush and Angoda Lokka.

Gaza’s health sector near collapse

Medics at al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City transport a Palestinian wounded by Israeli troops during Great March of Return rallies, on 14 May. Health authorities say that on that day Gaza witnessed a worse health crisis than during any single day in Israel’s 2014 offensive on the territory.
 Lewis JolySIPA

Amjad Ayman Yaghi- 7 June 2018

As the dust settles over Gaza, an already wobbling Egyptian-mediated ceasefire may bring some calm for the two million Palestinians trapped there without, yet again, any resolution to Gaza’s underlying problems.

The most pressing problem for Palestinians in Gaza remains a tottering infrastructure that threatens a full-blown humanitarian catastrophe at any moment. Water and electricity are scarce, sewage flows directly into the sea and the economy is in ruins.

The health sector has been the focus over the past few weeks since the Great March of Return protests put the spotlight back on Gaza.

The number of injuries resulting from Israeli attacks against unarmed protesters on the eastern boundary of the Gaza Strip nearly broke the back of an overstretched and under-resourced sector, exacerbating the pressure on health professionals and straining provision.

Medics even found themselves in the crosshairs, and two – Razan al-Najjar on 1 June and Mousa Jaber Abu Hassanein on 14 May – were killed while carrying out their duties.

The highest casualty count of the Great March of Return came on 14 May, and was followed by more protests – and more wounded – on 15 May. Both days brought with them shocking scenes at Gaza Strip hospitals.

With a huge number of wounded – more than 3,100 over those two days alone – there were no available beds and people were being treated in hallways or even at hospital entry gates.

There was an acute shortage of medicine and supplies, according to Ashraf al-Qedra, a health ministry spokesperson, who said hospitals had used 80 percent of ministry stores during those days.

“This crisis caused a huge deficit in hospitals in the Gaza Strip. Patients who seek public hospitals for treatment, cannot find the medical care they need due to hospitals overwhelmed with injuries,” al-Qedra told The Electronic Intifada.

Delays bring amputation, pain

Ahmad Shahin, 24, was shot in his left foot during protests on 14 May. He found himself writhing in pain in a corridor at Gaza City’s al-Shifa hospital, where operating theaters were too busy to take him in.

He was then transferred to al-Awda hospital, where he spent another night in agony before finally getting surgery.

By then his condition had become critical following an infection in his wound.
“I waited six hours for surgery,” Shahin, who lives in the Jabaliya refugee camp, told The Electronic Intifada. “My father had to buy a painkiller injection, because the hospital had run out. After surgery I found that my leg was amputated [below the knee], otherwise the infection would have spread.”

Hamza Rayan, 19, was shot near the neck on 15 May, paralyzing him in all four limbs. He was injured, he said, when trying to save his friend, Ahmad Hassan, also 19, who had been wounded. Until his father, Ayman, 45, told him in hospital that Hassan had been shot in his foot, Hamza did not know whether his friend was alive.

As in Shahin’s case, Hamza had to rely on his father to bring medical supplies that had run out in al-Shifa hospital. The elder Rayan bought fluids from an external pharmacy but he could not afford the cost of antibiotics or painkillers.

“I was one of dozens of people who had to buy medicines from outside pharmacies,” Ayman Rayan told The Electronic Intifada. “But I am unemployed. I was able to manage five saline solutions but now I can’t any more, and my son needs three saline solutions, painkillers and antibiotics on a daily basis.”

Hamza’s father has been forced to borrow money to cover the cost of his son’s medical needs. He buys from a local non-governmental organization, the Palestinian Medical Relief Society, and estimates the cost at $28 a day.

The World Bank has calculated the average annual income in Gaza in 2018 to be $1,826, which works out to $5 a day.

Normal service disrupted

With such an overwhelming number of emergencies, those seeking more routine medical care were shunted to the back of a queue that is still not cleared.

Mustafa al-Reyes, 27, suffered an intestinal infection on 19 May. But when he went to al-Shifa hospital, doctors turned him away, apologizing that they had no available beds, and urged him to seek treatment at a private hospital.

“We were shocked to see the number of injuries,” his brother Muhammad told The Electronic Intifada. “My brother was in pain. He asked me to take him to a private clinic where he received the required medical treatment.”

But private care is no answer in Gaza, where the vast majority of those seeking medical attention cannot afford it.

And public hospitals remain overwhelmed. Ayman al-Sahbani, head of al-Shifa’s emergency department, pointed out that many of the serious injuries from across the Gaza Strip have been transferred to al-Shifa, the Gaza Strip’s largest hospital and the one with the most specialists.
Many of those waiting for follow-up surgeries are still waiting, said al-Sahbani.

“The wounded consume double the medical care than normal patients, and some of our medical stores are empty,” said al-Sahbani. “International institutions help by sending emergency supplies, but it is not enough. We are still waiting for some medical supplies promised by international institutions.”

Outside help – from governments and international NGOs like Medical Aid for Palestinians, the International Committee of the Red Cross and Médecins Sans Frontières – has been widely sought, according to al-Sahbani.

Some NGOs already have a presence on the ground and medical teams have arrived from Jordan to help their colleagues in Gaza as well as to refer injuries to Jordan.

Abdel Latif al-Hajj, the general director of Gaza’s hospitals in the health ministry, said the sector struggled to cope on 14 May, a day he said that witnessed a worse health crisis than during any single day in the 2014 Israeli offensive on Gaza.

Near collapse

“The medical system almost collapsed on 14 May,” al-Hajj told The Electronic Intifada. “No health system can accommodate such a huge amount of injuries, but we fought to provide medical service, both in the emergency rooms where we added additional beds, in tents erected outside hospitals, and medical tents in the field that could deal with minor injuries.”

According to al-Hajj, 80 operations were performed at al-Shifa hospital in six hours on 14 May. In all, he said, during those fateful hours, Gaza’s seven government hospitals performed more than 250 operations.

“International doctors from the Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, Medical Aid for Palestinians and others worked with us. All of them said they had never witnessed such a huge amount of suffering and brutality in their work in areas of conflict around the world,” said al-Hajj.

Hospitals are only just beginning to receive non-emergency patients, who have also suffered the consequences.

“There is a crisis for cancer patients. More than 80 percent of 8,000 patients have no access to chemotherapy, and most cannot leave the Gaza Strip for treatment,” said al-Hajj.

He notes that the health sector still lacks all types of antibiotics, intravenous solutions, anesthetics and powerful analgesics, as well as anticoagulants, which are considered a priority, in addition to general lab supplies and emergency tools such as surgical threading for fine surgery.

Ahmad Abu Sakran, 22, was shot in the shoulder during the 14 May protests. Much to his surprise, he was admitted for treatment at al-Shifa, even as the wounded flooded in.

“I was terrified to see the number of wounded,” he told The Electronic Intifada. His father also had to buy painkillers from a nearby pharmacy to alleviate his son’s discomfort.

“Every time I remember the scene I am shocked to remember the suffering that day.”

Amjad Ayman Yaghi is a journalist based in Gaza.

Michael Howard confronts Netanyahu over Gaza deaths

Tory peer subjects Israeli PM to sharp, unexpected questioning over killing of protesters
 ‘Why could you not use rubber bullets?’ the former Tory leader asked. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA



The former Conservative party leader Michael Howard has confronted the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, over Israel’s recent killing of more than 100 Palestinian protesters, demanding to know why the country’s defence forces used live ammunition to curb the protests.

Responding to sharp, unexpected questions from one of the most prominent Jewish figures in British politics, Netanyahu said he was looking for new technological solutions to prevent protesters scaling the fence separating Gaza from Israel. He insisted the protesters were either paid civilians or Hamas members.

Netanyahu was speaking at the close of a lightning tour of Berlin, Paris and London, where he told European leaders that the Iran nuclear deal was collapsing as EU firms ended investment in Iran. The US president, Donald Trump, pulled out of the deal last month partly due to Israeli claims, rejected in Europe, that Iran was “cheating” on the 2015 deal.

Netanyahu also gave a sharp warning that the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, would face direct Israeli military strikes if he allowed Iran to entrench itself in Syria.

Lord Howard said many people accepted the protests had not been peaceful, but added: “Fewer people sympathise with, and understand, the proposition that the only way to stop them scaling the fence was to kill them. Why could you not use rubber bullets? Why could you – if, in extremis, you had to use live ammunition – not shoot them in the legs? Why did you have to kill them?”

The British foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, raised similar questions with Netanyahu when they met on Wednesday.

Netanyahu told Howard that the methods he proposed had been tried, and claimed: “Hamas wanted the Jews to kill more. Their goal was to have as many casualties. Our goal was to minimise casualties.”

He said he would be the first to use non-lethal means if they could be found, and insisted he was exploring other options for the future.

Boris Johnson with Netanyahu in London at a previous meeting in 2017. Photograph: Darren Staples/AFP/Getty

He claimed his army was facing a new form of warfare. He said it was “unconscionable” that Hamas put civilians in front of its fighters as human shields. The military and political wings of Hamas were indistinguishable, he said, describing them as “the worst theocratic gangsters in the world”.

He suggested that the Hamas wings believed in nothing. “They don’t believe in democracy or pluralism. They hang gays. Why are progressive forces going behind some of the least progressive forces in the world?” The answer, he said, was antisemitism. “It is important to call things as they are.”

Netanyahu also sent out his clearest warning yet that he would not tolerate the Syrian civil war finishing with Iranians remaining inside Syria. It is an issue that increasingly preoccupies Russia as it tries to prevent Israel going to war against Assad if he allows Tehran’s influence to grow so close to Israel’s border.

In May, Israel launched a large-scale attack on what it said were Iranian targets in Syria, raising fears of a big confrontation. Those strikes followed a barrage of rockets that Israel said were fired toward its forces in the occupied Golan Heights by Iran from Syria.

Netanyahu said: “I think Mr Assad has to consider this. As long as he engages in this horrific civil war inside Syria we will not deny him a deal. Now that the war is over, and Daesh is finished, and he likes or allows Iran to come in to entrench itself with a view to attack Israel, with the intention of destroying Israel, and its sovereign territory, he is no longer immune, his regime is no longer immune.

“If he fires at us we will destroy his forces. So I think there is a new calculus that has to take place and Syria has to understand that Israel will not tolerate the Iranian military entrenchment in Syria against Israel, and the consequences are there not just to the Iranian forces, but to the Assad regime as well. I think that this is something he should consider very seriously.”

He said European leaders were very sympathetic to Israel’s desire to rid Syria of an Iranian presence, adding that this had been the chief focus of his round of conversations with European leaders.

Netanyahu also claimed that in his talks with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, there had been an understanding that Russia would not get in Israel’s way. He said Russia was not turning a blind eye and that Moscow could see what Israel was doing.

He said the Iranian nuclear deal was “effectively defunct” regardless of European support for it, since the weight of the US sanctions was forcing firms to make a choice about whether to do business with Iran or the US. Companies were having the choose between an economy that was 3% of the size of the US economy or forgo a multi-trillion market, he said. “It is a no-brainer,” he said, “and everyone is choosing effectively as we speak. Companies are pulling out of Iran.”

By removing an incentive to do business with Iran, the US had smashed Iran’s cash machine, he claimed, adding that most European leaders recognised that the nuclear deal with Iran was falling apart.
 This article was amended on 7 June 2018 to correct the number of Palestinian deaths.

Saudi to host meeting on supporting Jordan's economy


Riyadh says it will be looking for ways to overcome the 'crisis' in Jordan following mass demonstrations there

People raise their hands during a protest near the prime minister's office in Amman, Jordan (Rente

Saturday 9 June 2018
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Jordan will meet on Sunday to discuss ways to support Amman as it looks to tackle an economic crisis in the wake of protests.
Riyadh said in a statement on Saturday that King Salman had called the rulers of the three other nations to set up a meeting in Mecca after demonstrations rocked Jordan over a proposed tax increase. 
"They agreed to hold a meeting comprising the four countries ... to discuss means of supporting Jordan to overcome its current crisis," the statement carried by the official Saudi Press Agency said.
Cash-strapped Jordan, a close ally of the United States that relies heavily on donors, is struggling to curb its debt after securing a $723mn loan from the International Monetary Fund in 2016.
Austerity measures tied to the loan have seen prices of basic necessities rise across the kingdom, culminating in a week of angry protests over tax proposals that forced prime minister Hani Mulki to resign.
The authorities on Thursday announced they were withdrawing the unpopular legislation, but they still face a mammoth task to balance popular demands with the need to reduce the public debt burden. 
Jordan blames its economic woes on the instability rocking the region and the burden of hosting hundreds of thousands of refugees from war-torn Syria, complaining it has not received enough international support. 
King Abdullah told reporters on Monday that there had been a "failure and slackness on the part of some officials regarding decision-making" and that "the world has not fully shouldered its responsibilities" by reducing aid despite the kingdom hosting close to a million Syrian refugees.
The World Bank says Jordan has "weak growth prospects" this year, while 18.5 percent of the working age population is unemployed.
Saudi Arabia and the United States are two of the major donors providing vital economic assistance to Jordan. 

China hacked a Navy contractor and secured a trove of highly sensitive data on submarine warfare

China's sole operating aircraft carrier leaves Dalian in northeast China for sea trials last month. (Li Gang/Xinhua/AP)

Chinese government hackers have compromised the computers of a Navy contractor, stealing massive amounts of highly sensitive data related to undersea warfare — including secret plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile for use on U.S. submarines by 2020, according to American officials.

The breaches occurred in January and February, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. The hackers targeted a contractor who works for the Naval Undersea Warfare Center, a military organization headquartered in Newport, R.I., that conducts research and development for submarines and underwater weaponry.

The officials did not identify the contractor.

Taken were 614 gigabytes of material relating to a closely held project known as Sea Dragon, as well as signals and sensor data, submarine radio room information relating to cryptographic systems, and the Navy submarine development unit’s electronic warfare library.

The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details about the compromised missile project at the request of the Navy, which argued that their release could harm national security.

 
 
 
China is rapidly modernizing its forces in an attempt to match the U.S. might in Asia.
The data stolen was of a highly sensitive nature despite being housed on the contractor’s unclassified network. The officials said the material, when aggregated, could be considered classified, a fact that raises concerns about the Navy’s ability to oversee contractors tasked with developing ­cutting-edge weapons.

The breach is part of China’s long-running effort to blunt the U.S. advantage in military technology and become the preeminent power in East Asia. The news comes as the Trump administration is seeking to secure Beijing’s support in persuading North Korea to give up nuclear weapons, even as tensions persist between the United States and China over trade and defense matters.

The Navy is leading the investigation into the breach with the assistance of the FBI, officials said. The FBI declined to comment.

On Friday, the Pentagon inspector general’s office said that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis had asked it to review contractor cybersecurity issues arising from The Post’s story.

Cmdr. Bill Speaks, a Navy spokesman, said, “There are measures in place that require companies to notify the government when a ‘cyber incident’ has occurred that has actual or potential adverse effects on their networks that contain controlled unclassified information.”

Speaks said that “it would be inappropriate to discuss further details at this time.”

Altogether, details on hundreds of mechanical and software systems were compromised — a significant breach in a critical area of warfare that China has identified as a priority, both for building its own capabilities and challenging those of the United States.

“It’s very disturbing,” said former senator James M. Talent (R-Mo.), who is a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. “But it’s of a piece with what the Chinese have been doing. They are completely focused on getting advanced weapons technology through all kinds of means. That includes stealing secrets from our defense contractors.” Talent had no independent knowledge of the breach.

Undersea priority

The Sea Dragon project is an initiative of a special Pentagon office stood up in 2012 to adapt existing U.S. military technologies to new applications. The Defense Department, citing classification levels, has released little information about Sea Dragon other than to say that it will introduce a “disruptive offensive capability” by “integrating an existing weapon system with an existing Navy platform.” The Pentagon has requested or used more than $300 million for the project since late 2015 and has said it plans to start underwater testing by September.

Military experts fear that China has developed capabilities that could complicate the Navy’s ability to defend U.S. allies in Asia in the event of a conflict with China.

The Chinese are investing in a range of platforms, including ­quieter submarines armed with increasingly sophisticated weapons and new sensors, Adm. Philip S. Davidson said during his April nomination hearing to lead U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. And what they cannot develop on their own, they steal — often through cyberspace, he said.

“One of the main concerns that we have,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee, “is ­cyber and penetration of the dot-com networks, exploiting technology from our defense contractors, in some instances.” 

In February, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats testified that most of the detected Chinese cyber operations against U.S. industry focus on defense contractors or tech firms supporting government networks.

In recent years, the United States has been scrambling to develop new weapons or systems that can counter a Chinese naval buildup that has targeted perceived weaknesses in the U.S. fleet. Key to the American advantage in any faceoff with China on the high seas in Asia will be its submarine fleet.
“U.S. naval forces are going to have a really hard time operating in that area, except for submarines, because the Chinese don’t have a lot of anti-submarine warfare capability,” said Bryan Clark, a naval analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. “The idea is that we are going to rely heavily on submarines in the early effort of any conflict with the Chinese.”

China has made closing the gap in undersea warfare one of its three top military priorities, and although the United States still leads the field, China is making a concerted effort to diminish U.S. superiority.

“So anything that degrades our comparative advantage in undersea warfare is of extreme significance if we ever had to execute our war plans for dealing with China,” said James Stavridis, dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a retired admiral who served as supreme allied commander at NATO. 

The U.S. military let its anti-ship weaponry languish after the Cold War ended because with the Soviet Union’s collapse, the Navy no longer faced a peer competitor on the seas. But the rapid modernization and buildup of the Chinese navy in recent years, as well as Russia’s resurgent forces at sea, have prompted the Pentagon to renew heavy investment in technologies to sink enemy warships.

The introduction of a supersonic anti-ship missile on U.S. Navy submarines would make it more difficult for Chinese warships to maneuver. It also would augment a suite of other anti-ship weapons that the U.S. military has been developing in recent years. 

Ongoing breaches

For years, Chinese government hackers have siphoned information on the U.S. military, underscoring the challenge the Pentagon faces in safeguarding details of its technological advances. Over the years, the Chinese have snatched designs for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter; the advanced Patriot PAC-3 missile system; the Army system for shooting down ballistic missiles known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense; and the Navy’s new Littoral Combat Ship, a small surface vessel designed for near-shore operations, according to previous reports prepared for the Pentagon.

In some cases, suspected Chinese breaches appear to have resulted in copycat technologies, such as the drones China has produced that mimic U.S. unmanned aircraft.

Speaks, the Navy spokesman, said: “We treat the broader issue of cyber-intrusion against our contractors very seriously. If such an intrusion were to occur, the appropriate parties would be looking at the specific incident, taking measures to protect current information, and mitigating the impacts that might result from any information that might have been compromised.”

The Pentagon’s Damage Assessment Management Office has conducted an assessment of the damage, according to the U.S. officials. The Office of the Secretary of Defense declined to comment.

Theft of an electronic warfare library, Stavridis said, could give the Chinese “a reasonable idea of what level of knowledge we have about their specific [radar] platforms, electronically and potentially acoustically, and that deeply reduces our level of comfort if we were in a close undersea combat situation with China.”

Signals and sensor data is also valuable in that it presents China with the opportunity to “know when we would know at what distance we would be able to detect their submarines,” he said — again a key factor in undersea battles.

Investigators say the hack was carried out by the Chinese Ministry of State Security, a civilian spy agency responsible for counterintelligence, foreign intelligence and domestic political security. The hackers operated out of an MSS division in the province of Guangdong, which houses a major foreign hacking department.

Although the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is far better-known than the MSS when it comes to hacking, the latter’s personnel are more skilled and much better at hiding their tracks, said Peter Mattis, a former analyst in the CIA counterintelligence center. The MSS, he said, hacks for all forms of intelligence: foreign, military and commercial.

In September 2015, in a bid to avert economic sanctions, Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged to President Barack Obama that China would refrain from conducting commercial cyberespionage against the United States. Following the pact, China appeared to have curtailed much, although not all, of its hacking activity against U.S. firms, including by the People’s Liberation Army.

Both China and the United States consider spying on military technology to fall outside the pact. 

“The distinction we’ve always made is there’s a difference between conducting espionage in order to protect national security and conduct military operations, and the theft of intellectual property for the benefit of companies inside your country,” said Michael Daniel, the White House cybersecurity coordinator under Obama.

The United States and Europe Still Need Each Other

In the run-up to the G-7 summit, Trump seemed to forget a key lesson from history.

G-7 leaders participate in a working session in Quebec, Canada, on June 8. (Ludovic Marin/AFP/Getty Images)

No automatic alt text available.
BY , -
  Talk to any long-standing observer of the trans-Atlantic relationship and you will hear that the United States and Europe are on a collision course. From climate change to the Iran nuclear deal to tariffs on steel and aluminum, the two sides of the Atlantic increasingly find themselves at odds over a long list of foreign-policy and trade issues. But those same observers will also tell you that trans-Atlantic rifts have been a long-standing feature of the relationship, surfacing quite regularly over the last 70 years. The real question is whether what the trans-Atlantic partners are experiencing today is any different from, say, the deep divisions they experienced over the Iraq War. It didn’t take that long for Europe and the United States to overcome that disagreement and return to a rich agenda of cooperation. In other words, the United States snapped back then and will snap back again (presumably once President Donald Trump has left office). Right? Not so fast.

The United States and Europe have had ruptures over trade before and managed to more or less resolve them respectfully, without questioning the institutions or values that have served as the bedrock of the relationship.

But in 2018, the United States has a leader who wants to be provocative, disruptive, and unpredictable just for the sake of it. Trump is challenging conventional foreign-policy wisdom on numerous issues: withdrawing the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement and Paris climate accord, moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. He is openly fighting with U.S. allies (especially Germany) and world leaders, engaging in an unprecedented Twitter disputebefore an international summit. While couching trade disputes with Washington’s closest allies in national security terms, he is calling for Russia’s return to the G-7 and lavishing praise on North Korea’s leader. He is also questioning long-held norms, such as the U.S. commitment to NATO security, the value of the European Union, and the merits of international trade.

Europeans have tried an array of strategies to engage him, from German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s stern headmaster approach to French President Emmanuel Macron’s charm offensive. But what has become clear in recent months is that Trump can’t be cajoled, charmed, or bullied. To his credit, he is focused on substance over style. He is sticking to his principles, primarily the deeply held belief that Europe has long been ripping off the United States.

More problematic is Trump’s apparent unwillingness to respond to logic or reason. Europeans are following the same learning curve that Americans went through last year: desperately looking for process, signs of normality, and a sense that things will eventually function as normal. But this is not normal. Europeans are beginning to realize the need to reposition themselves and engage differently with the United States. But how?

Committed Atlanticists on both shores are struggling to answer this question. Many of us have argued that Trump does not represent the views of all Americans, pointing to a plurality of perspectives. Throughout 2017, there was consensus that working more closely with Congress was time well spent. It appeared interested in holding the administration accountable and using its limited powers on foreign policy. But Congress has taken little interest in monitoring the administration’s execution of sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, the Senate hasn’t held a hearing on Russia in more than a year, and few Republican legislators, other than Sen. John McCain, are willing to challenge the president on his constant attacks on America’s closest allies.

As Trump increasingly treats U.S. allies as strategic competitors bordering on adversaries, some Europeans are seemingly considering whether to view the United States as an adversary in response. In the run-up to the G-7 summit in Quebec, Canada, which began Friday, Macron tweeted: “The American President may not mind being isolated, but neither do we mind signing a 6 country agreement if need be. Because these 6 countries represent values, they represent an economic market which has the weight of history behind it and which is now a true international force.” If this was the mood music before the G-7, imagine how bad things will be at next month’s NATO Summit.

History has repeatedly shown that the United States and Europe are stronger and more effective when working together.Yet these lessons seem to be forgotten, as we are rapidly approaching a dangerous moment in the trans-Atlantic relationship. This week began with commemorations marking the 74th anniversary of D-Day, a decisive battle that helped end a devastating world war, led to active U.S. involvement in rebuilding a strong and prosperous Europe, and heralded decades of successful trans-Atlantic cooperation on shared problems. This week is ending with the potential exclusion of the United States from a joint statement of the world’s leading industrialized nations. The deterioration of this relationship will be devastating to the United States, Europe, and their collective global interests. The American people, and Congress, need to speak out before it is too late.

Nearly 1,800 immigrant families separated at US border in four months

  • Figures cover period from October 2017 to February
  • Senior official: separations have risen sharply in recent weeks
Central American immigrants await transportation to a US border patrol processing center after crossing the Rio Grande from Mexico into Texas. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images

Reuters in Washington-Fri 8 Jun 2018

Nearly 1,800 immigrant families were separated at the US-Mexico border from October 2016 until February of this year, as Donald Trump implemented stricter border enforcement policies, according to a senior government official.

The numbers are the first comprehensive disclosure by the administration of how many families have been affected by the policies. Previously, the only numbers provided by federal officials on family separations covered a single two-week period in May.

The government official, who agreed to speak only on condition of anonymity, said he could not provide up-to-date statistics, but acknowledged the number of separations had risen sharply in recent weeks, largely because of new administration policies.

In May, the US attorney general, Jeff Sessions, announced a “zero tolerance” policy in which all those apprehended entering the United States illegally would be criminally charged, which generally leads to children being separated from their parents.

A US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official testified last month to Congress that between 6 and 19 May, 658 children were separated from 638 parents because of the stepped-up prosecutions.

 That brings the total of officially acknowledged separations to more than 2,400, though that does not include recent weeks or the period from 1 March to 6 May.

Immigration and child advocates, Democratic lawmakers and the United Nations have all condemned the practice of separating families at the border, but the administration has defended its actions saying it is protecting children and making clear that illegal border crossers will be prosecuted regardless of their family circumstances.

In most of the 1,768 cases of families separated by border agents between October 2016 and February, children were removed from parents for medical reasons or because of security concerns, the official said, citing examples such as parents needing hospitalization or officials discovering the parent had a criminal record either in the United States or in their home country.

In 237 cases, the official said, children were removed because border agents suspected adults were falsely posing as the parents of minors in their charge.

The period for which statistics were provided included the final three months of the Obama administration in 2016, but the official could not say whether any of the separations occurred then.

The practice of separating families has not been systematically tracked until now, the official said, and the figures given to Reuters had to be compiled manually.

“Why weren’t we pulling these statistics before? Because it wasn’t a big enough phenomenon that had public interest,” the official said. “Now it’s increasing and it’s of public interest.“

The bulk of the separations involved Central Americans, who make up the majority of families crossing the south-west border. Some were apprehended trying to cross the border illegally, while others crossed illegally and then presented themselves to border patrol agents asking for asylum because they feared returning home.

The official noted that the number of separations from October 2016 to February this year represented less than 2% of the 106,700 family units arrested along the south-west border during that same period.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing the government on behalf of a Congolese asylum seeker who turned herself in to border guards in California only to have her seven-year-old daughter taken from her and housed in government custody more than 2,000 miles away in Chicago for months.

The government said in legal papers that it took the child into custody because it could not corroborate the two were related. The ACLU argued the question could have been quickly resolved by a DNA test, which was only done much later.

Lee Gelernt, the ACLU attorney representing the woman and other parents in similar situations, said the Trump administration is using allegations of fraud and security concerns to justify a policy that is aimed not at protecting children but at deterring future border crossers.

“Deterrence is a policy measure that uses these children as pawns and violates the basic fundamental notion of what’s in the child’s best interest,” said Gelernt.

On Friday, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the senior Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, along with 26 other Democrats and two independents, introduced a bill that would put new limits on federal law enforcement’s ability to separate immigrant children from their families unless a court decides that would be best for the child.

South African police raid Bank of Baroda in corruption investigation



JUNE 8, 2018

JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - An elite South Africa police unit raided offices of Bank of Baroda on Friday and seized documents as part of an investigation into state corruption under former president Jacob Zuma, a police spokesman said.

File Photo: The logo of Bank of Baroda is pictured at its headquarters in Mumbai, India, May 3, 2016. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

Bank of Baroda, which is winding down its operations in South Africa, was thrust into the spotlight two years ago when it started working with the Guptas, a family of Indian-born businessmen who are at the centre of an influence-peddling scandal surrounding Zuma.

Zuma and the Guptas deny wrongdoing.

Police raided Bank of Baroda branches in Johannesburg and Durban and took documents showing bank transactions involving South African state firms, Hangwani Mulaudzi, a spokesman for the police’s elite “Hawks” unit, said.

“We are of the view that Bank of Baroda was used as a conduit for the transfer of illicit funds. The raids are happening as part of ‘state capture’ investigations,” Mulaudzi said, using a phrase coined to describe alleged influence-peddling under Zuma.

A Bank of Baroda employee in Durban who picked up the telephone confirmed the Hawks had visited the bank’s premises on Friday.

“This search and seizure operation is not for investigation on Bank of Baroda. This requisition by the Hawks is in relation to the continuing ongoing investigation of the Gupta family,” the bank said in a statement on Saturday.

The bank has been cooperating with investigating agencies and has shared relevant documents with them, it said.

An inquiry into allegations surrounding Zuma and the Guptas will begin formal public hearings in August and could take two years or more, officials have said.

Police earlier this year raided the compound of the Guptas in Johannesburg as part of an investigation into theft, fraud and money laundering at a state-backed dairy project in the Free State province that was meant to benefit the local community.

The whereabouts of the Gupta brothers is not publicly known. One of the brothers, Ajay Gupta, was declared a “fugitive from justice” after leaving South Africa for Dubai in February.

Gupta family representatives in South Africa could not be reached for comment.

Zuma was in court on Friday for a separate hearing relating to a $2.5 billion arms deal from the 1990s. He faces 16 charges of fraud, racketeering, corruption and money laundering in that case.

Reporting by Alexander Winning; Additional reporting by Rajendra Jadhav in MUMBAI; Editing by James Macharia and Mark Potter
The world as a hostile workplace: Harassment from Hollywood to Ho Chi Minh


LAST week, the Academy Award-winning producer Harvey Weinstein turned himself in to police in New York City to be arraigned on charges of rape and criminal sexual assault. He is also the subject of ongoing criminal investigations in Los Angeles and London based on claims of sexual harassment, intimidation and violence made by dozens of women.

Certainly, the many credible allegations against Weinstein helped raise awareness about the pervasiveness of sexual harassment in the US, with more than half of working women saying they have been subjected to harassment in the workplace.
The trajectory of his spectacular fall from the Hollywood constellation triggered the ouster of many other high-profile media figures and politicians accused of misconduct, and helped build a more cohesive movement to improve laws and corporate policies against harassment.


But timing is everything, and many in the US have wondered whether the last presidential election would have ended differently had it been held just six months later, as the boys-will-be-boys shrug which greeted allegations of harassment by Donald Trump is no longer viewed by the public as an adequate response to reports of misconduct.

On the same day Weinstein was arraigned, however, an important report about sexual harassment was released to little fanfare. Gender based violence in the Walmart garment supply chain details the experiences of workers in factories in Bangladesh, Cambodia and Indonesia which supply Walmart.

The report also explains the risk factors that make such workers vulnerable to gender-based violence, including sexual harassment.

2018-06-05T145504Z_1887453920_RC19356651D0_RTRMADP_3_PEOPLE-HARVEY-WEINSTEIN
Film producer Harvey Weinstein leaves court in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., June 5, 2018. Source: Reuters/Brendan McDermid
Though women comprise the overwhelming majority of global textile workers, they seldom hold management or supervisory positions. Instead, they generally work in the lowest-wage roles of button machine operator, helpers, checkers and line tailors. Such gendered concentration of the workforce is endemic in the global garment industry and creates the type of power imbalance in which harassment can flourish and generally go unchecked.
Another typical garment industry practice that subjects female workers to harassment is the use of short-term contracts, which leaves workers at constant risk of being fired. This uncertainty allows implicit threats of non-renewal to stifle workers’ ability to report incidents of violence or harassment.

Further, the common industry practice of subcontracting makes it difficult to trace accountability back to the brand.


But even if workers do report harassment, and it is possible to determine the link to a supplier, more than one-third of all nations do not have laws against sexual harassment in the workplace, leaving more than 235 million women workers unprotected.

Now, however, there is an opportunity to define the problem of gender-based violence and harassment in the workplace, and to create a framework for governments, employers, workers and unions to more effectively address it. The International Labour Organization (ILO), meeting in Geneva from 28 May to 6 June, is convening a Standard Setting Committee tasked with ending violence and harassment in the world of work.

By examining both violence directed at women because they are women, and violence which disproportionately impacts women, the ILO is expected to adopt a broad definition of worker, which encompasses those in both the formal and informal economies, and includes all migrant workers, regardless of their legal status in the place of employment.

shutterstock_1082800268
Though women comprise the overwhelming majority of global textile workers, they seldom hold management or supervisory positions. Source: Pinar Alver / Shutterstock

One area which could greatly benefit from an expansion of ILO standards is the export processing zone, or special economic zone, a prevalent model in Southeast Asia. These zones are frequently exempt from labour laws and typically feature employer-provided housing – generally large dormitories where women who have travelled from rural provinces to find work in urban factories live.

I visited such an export zone several years ago in the Dagon Township of Yangon. All the garment workers I met there were women who worked 12-hour days, six days a week. On their one day off, many of them gathered at a training centre sponsored by the Federation of Trade Unions of Burma to learn English and take turns working their way through software tutorials on the centre’s one computer, in the hope of getting better jobs outside the factory environment.


Although the law requires workers at the factories in the export zone to be at least 15 years old, the women’s faces told a different story. Most were very young. They all deserved the right to fulfil their potential and advance in the world of work as far as their initiative and skills could take them, but I wonder how many of them abandoned their career plans in the intervening years due to the pervasive effects of sexual harassment.

Whether uttered on a Hollywood back lot or on a Phnom Penh factory floor, the phrase “You better come along if you want to continue working here – don’t you know who I am?” has been used to intimidate and terrorise women for too long.

The ILO can now help coalesce employment-based attitudes and practices against harassment, to in effect finally reply, “Yes, we know who you are, and we’re not going to take it anymore.”

This article originally appeared on PolicyForum.net.