Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, June 4, 2018

Are we as Gullible as our Politicians make us out to be? 


article_image

Reggie ponnampalam-June 2, 2018, 8:09

I am not the first to say that it is the politicians who have ruined this country – the President himself made this declaration recently. And the way politicians, their acolytes, henchmen and even family members continue to enrich themselves and impoverish the average citizen, I will not be the last.

While growing up, we had a wide variety of politicians of diverse hues and views visiting our home and imbibing in my Mums ‘Marie’ biscuits and tea, with the occasional "Pol Gaha Yata Kotiya" labeled stuff thrown in by my Dad. They included veterans, stalwarts, wannabe’s and, also-rans. Some went on to become MMC’s, MP’s, Mayors, Ministers and a more. My sister worked at Sri Kotha (it was down a lane in Colpetty then) and my first job happened to be in an office adjacent to the SLFP Headquarters at Darley Road. That too was only a single storey house then. Being physically close to politicians did not in any way bring me close to any of them in any other aspect; I just developed a natural aversion to them. As far as I am concerned, collectively, they ‘developed’ this country to aptly fit Donald Trump’s description of "Shithole Country". People are sometimes categorized as Anti-Semitic. Islam phobic, Anti-Christian, Racist, extremist and a whole lot more. I just detest politicians. Period.

Starting off with whom many describe as the "Father of the Nation", DS caused the rift by wanting Dudley as his political heir, overriding seniors of the caliber of SWRD and Sir John. Although I do agree Dudley was a good person, as a politician he was nowhere as good. Sir John vowed to apply tar on the heads of monks and only achieved being ‘tarred’ with almost obliterating the UNP at the elections. SWRD came up with his "Pancha Maha Balavegaya" and today we have monks who sell their Duty Free permits, ‘graduated’ monks demanding employment (among other things); Farmers who either have not enough water or fertilizer for their crops and, when they do have these, they have no buyers for their harvest; Teachers who are made to kneel before politicians; Workers who cry "Mayday" and take strike action at the slightest provocation, while Mayday has become a political rally; and we have the "Ratay Vedas" who have their own prescription on how a country should be run.

SWRD boldly brought on "Sinhala Only" and today we hear of international aid running into hundreds of millions of dollars to improve English education. Schools were ‘nationalized’ while today there are arguably more "International Schools" than Madhya Maha Vidyalayas. We had the original "Electric Vehicles" – Trolley Buses and Tramcars plying the roads of Colombo, but they just ceased to exist. Bus services were also ‘nationalized’ and we ended up with a "Colossal" Transport Board that, at one time, was reported to have around 20 employees for each bus in service. It’s back to private bus services and it would be interesting if some research is done on how many of these ‘private’ buses are owned by politicians.

The "Suddhas" exploited us over the centuries and we had to become an Independent Republic and we created a "Supreme Parliament". Well and good if it was limited to legislation alone. While we became politically independent, the Judicial Services Commission, Public Service Commission, Police Commission and other hitherto independent bodies just vanished. Parliament and by extension politicians decided on who gets which job and what that job entails. Notably, Policemen ended up taking orders from politicians and, to a great extent, this is one of the fundamental reasons for the prevailing law and order situation we have today. Another notable feature is that "Public Service" became Government Service and political appointees only have to serve their ‘masters’. Sometimes they become as powerful (and as wealthy) as their ‘masters’. On the international ‘catwalk’ we opted for Socialism and Non-Alignment. We even had a taste of what was ‘fashionable’ around Africa and Latin America at that time – an attempt at Bloody Revolution! By the way, Australia and Canada are still "Dominions" of Britain and they are not doing badly at all.

A quick jump to the ‘adharma yugaya’ of Dharmista. Twiddling his thumbs at the corridors of power for decades, JR finds himself thrust into a position of unprecedented power – he has to do the unprecedented – achieve unbridled power. He anointed himself Executive President and declared that the only thing he could not do was to make a man a woman and a woman a man. He did not need to, as he had undated resignations of all who mattered in his hand. There were some fine men and women who were ripped of their backbone. JR didn’t need wealth, he only lusted for power and all he had to do was accede to the virtual institutionalizing of corruption. Increased salaries, allowances and other perks tax free and vehicles duty free. The 30 year Mahaweli Project was telescoped down to five years with the promise that we would be able to export electricity to India. Is it because we are exporting too much electricity that I come across frequent articles warning of a power crisis in the foreseeable future?

Parallel with this was Premadasa’s "Dream on my mind, a house of my own; I’ll make some day my ‘Home Sweet Home’" Million Houses Project - by virtue, a noble concept. Roads were more a necessity than roundabouts and clock towers. Swamps and marshlands were filled, coconut plantations were partitioned out and converted into home plots with the single-minded drive to build houses, houses and more houses. Some of these very houses are now frequently inundated by floods or landslides, (‘Garbage-slides’ included) and the occupants pay a dear price for their coconuts. I happened to see a recent documentary portraying sand as a dwindling resource worldwide and the aqenvironmental effects of uncontrolled sand mining. Who cares? "Umbey katay pus, magey katay mus" –sand in your mouth, beef in mine!

Chandrika comes along breathing fire at "dhooshanaya, bheeshaniya" and ends up being ordered to pay a fine by a court of law – and it was not for ridding the country of the "Bahubootha Viyawasthawa". Her heart-rending tale of woe during her campaign was that she had to sell her family ‘jewels’ to survive. Those jewels sure must have fetched a fancy price as she can now afford to globe-trot on a regular basis.

Mahinda emerges unscathed from ‘helping’ Hambantota, although a Chief Justice has subsequently apologized for the ‘help’ meted out by him. Mahinda’s claim to fame is that he won the war, but did he win the peace? Prabakaran was killed, but was the enemy defeated? Was the LTTE the only enemy? Okay, he’s a hero but do generations have to pay back loans taken for a barely used airport, stadium and conference center to perpetuate his name? How much of an urgent need was the Magampura Rajapakse Port? I wouldn’t consult a dentist who specializes in gift horses, but do I need an optician to tell me I see a Trojan in the Port City Project? Lasantha Wickrematunge, Ekneligoda and Wasim Thajudeen are now dead men – they tell no tales. There’s no denying Mahinda stood by his supporters; he even went to the extent of going by helicopter to rescue one supporter from being arrested by the cops for the trivial offense of drug trafficking and he even had another appointed ‘Monitoring MP’ of the Defense Ministry.

We thought we ushered in a new era but now realize we repeated the same error when we ushered in "Maithree Palanaya" in January 2015. We elected a President and got saddled with a Prime Minister as well. The latest ‘revelation’ is that Maithree had nothing to do with Mahinda being allowed to pack bag and baggage, take with him his choice of vehicles and the helicopter ride back home. We did see processions of petitions, high profile arrests and even a sense of pride in displaying handcuffed hands. Of course we had a guy sentenced by a Court of Law for distributing Sil Redi. Then again, he has a right to appeal and, since the appeal process takes some seven years, he is allowed out on bail. A number of other cases are pending, depending mainly on political circumstances.

The ‘Bond Scam’ was a crime that never happened, (although it recurred) until a Presidential Commission of Inquiry was appointed. Then we came across a Finance Minister, who had just been voted Best Finance Minister in Asia, claiming he did not know who was paying his house rent. The intrigue and payoffs were unraveled and reported. Now, however, a new list of ‘beneficiaries’ is emerging and some are even volunteering information that they have been recipients. Dayasiri claims that it is normal for businessmen to ‘donate’ money to politicians. We all know that prudent businessmen only make investments. Of course, businessmen do make donations to schools, temples, churches and other religious/charitable institutions. This is philanthropy. However, when they dole out money to politicians, they work on the philosophy, "You scratch my back, I scratch yours". There is no such thing as a free lunch.

The tragedy of it all is that now we have no governance to speak of – it is a case of some trying to retain power, some others trying to undermine them, others trying to topple them – the battle is not about development, it is about power. In place of the traditional Parliamentary Debate, we now have accusations, barbs and the crudest form of ‘blame-game’ played at the highest levels. While people are suffering with increases in prices of gas, petrol, kerosene, milk powder and bus fares, some are waiting for power to fall into their laps.

It’s not the faces, it’s the system that should change. Otherwise, we will end up like a typical discussion as follows –

One guy tells the other guy, "Machang, the country has gone to the dogs". The other guy says, "That was long ago Machang. Now, even the dogs are not willing to take it".

Siva Senai’s Anti-Muslim Tirade – Buddhists & Hindus Should Be Careful 

Lakmal Harischandra
“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated” ~ Coretta Scott King
logoIt is not rocket science to realize that the underlying plans of  this Hindu fundamentalist outfit is to create further dissensions among the Muslim and Tamil Hindu communities at a challenging time in history where religious fundamentalism and anti-Muslim hate has almost mainstream in our society. Sometime back, there was a big commotion in a Trinco school where a Muslims teacher was not allowed to wear her Abhaya which created lot of bad blood and bitter taste in already strained inter communal relationships. It was widely suspected that Siva Senai and some disgruntled Tamil politicians were involved in this case. Then we had the case of the leader of Siva Senai making another commotion about cattle slaughter in Chavakachcheri. In speaking to an little known TV station, he made a vicious statement – He said that if Muslims cannot fall in line with the lifestyles of the majority – the Buddhists and Hindus, then they must leave, little realizing that the Muslims are part of our heritage for over 10 centuries- a typical Islamophobiastatement which we hear being regularly uttered by other Sinhala Buddhist extremist anti Muslim groups. Both these incidents arising only with the last few months after the infamous Digana anti-Muslim violence cannot be dismissed as a parallel one-off event totally unconnected; rather signs are clear that there appears to be coordination and resonance in their anti-Muslim messages between both Sinhala Buddhist hate groups like BBS, and Sinha Ley and Hindu hate outfit like Siva Senai.
It was in 2016 that the dreaded militant Shiv Sena in Mumbai extended its support to its Sri Lankan Tamil outfit called Siva Senai, (which takes its name from Lord Shiva ) which then triggered concerns among the mainstream politicians that sectarian outfits will reopen wounds of a 30-year-old civil war that ended only in 2009. Concerns were then raised that the militant nature of the new Siva Senai could break the status-quo prevailing in Northern Lanka while Tamils were wary that outfits like Senai would split Tamil unity.    The Siva Senai, operating in the North, is led by a Sachithananthan then said in a press interview that his party extends support to the new Lankan outfit. However the Siva Sena says that that they also  had the support of BJP, VHP, and RSS. Despite Siva Senai’s recent assertion  to join hands with the extreme Buddhist groups against the Muslims, it’s original plan was to fight “coercive conversion” from Hinduism to Buddhism,which is the dominant religion among the Sinhalese. 
Our nation has just come out of a bloody war. It was clear that outfits like BBS tried to start off religious based wars by launching a hate campaign against the Muslims , with some support from the higher ups from the Rajapakse government. The result was further chaos in the country and dissension between Sinhalese and Muslims. Therefore, we don’t need another religion based political outfit like Siva Senai, just as we don’t need Sinhala Buddhist extremist outfits like BBS. Later during this government too which was voted in on a national reconciliation platform,  other outfits like Sinhaley and Amitha/Saliya’Prasad combine continued those anti –Muslim hate campaign and violence culminating in Digana. We are aware of what Shiva Sena has been doing in India and obviously we therefore don’t need more Sri Lankan Senaas to add to our agony. 
In fact, Tamil leaders were more worried about the Siva Senai even at that time than the Southern political parties. They feared that although Senai was a new organization with little mass support, the prospect of a religion-based divide loomed large. Thus, observers saw the formation of Siva Sena as a regressive development in Sri Lankan Tamil politics. In fact MP Sumanthiran had this to say that that time in a press interview . “Assertion of a religious identity is not a bad thing. But at this stage, we don’t need it. Our identity is Tamil identity. We are totally secular. There are Hindus, Christians, and Muslims among the Tamils. All are equal. We can’t divide them on the basis of religion. Such organisations can take extreme positions. We already have a Buddhist extremist organisation Bodu Bala Sena (BBS). Birth of another extremist organisation opposed to BBS ideology is a very dangerous thing. It can create enmity between different religions. Both are called Sena, meaning army. Whatever may be their good intention, but the perception is negative. We can’t have outfits with the names like Sena.”. With outfits like Siva Sena and politicians like Wigneswaran, parading a Hindu identity, which is no longer taboo,  was not a part of Sri Lankan Tamil politics earlier,. Besides, Seva Senai modelled after the militant Shiv Sena of India  “can become uncontrollable.” 
Many observers also see the hand of India in the formation of Siva Senai. The Siva Senai have shown signs of expanding its’ network, with plans to have organisers for all the 25 districts of Sri Lanka which will therefore require external support. As  Sachchithanantham himself accepted, he expects to get funding from India and the Tamil diaspora. Therefore, there is more than it meet the eye. 
However interestingly , this time Siva Sena appears to toe a unified line with Sinhala Buddhist extremists in attempting to alienate the Muslims of Sri Lankan through the language of cattle slaughter. Both Hindu as well as the Sinhala Buddhist community should be careful in not getting trapped into this Siva Sena narrative in attempting to alienate another community –The Muslims. 

Read More

Gay Pride in SL: A moment to accept, acknowledge and CELEBRATE LGBTIQ LIVES

2018-06-04
As the month of June approaches, countries all over the world, be it conservative or liberal, celebrate the anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, now celebrated as Gay PRIDE or LGBT PRIDE worldwide. The Stonewall riots (referred to sometimes as the Stonewall uprising or the Stonewall rebellion) were a series of unprompted, sometimes violent demonstrations by members of the (LGBT) community against a police raid that took place in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village in New York City. These riots were considered to be the most important event leading to the gay liberation movement and the modern fight for LGBT rights in the United States.   
Throughout Pride month, and in our daily lives, the LGBTIQ community is reminded that in Sri Lanka, one cannot enjoy Pride as most countries do. There are no large Pride marches on the streets of Colombo. Instead, Pride in Sri Lanka carefully celebrates our lives and who we are by holding a series of events that draw attention to the natural complexities and simplicity of LGBTIQ lives in this country. Draconian laws still remain in Sri Lanka and homosexuality is still illegal causing much damage to our society gay and straight alike. I say this, because a society that is divided, a society that is filled with hate and jealousy is a dysfunctional society that is only bound to self-destruct if sanity does not prevail.  

"Draconian laws still remain in Sri Lanka and homosexuality is still illegal causing much damage to our society gay and straight alike"

Lack of government protection, let alone acknowledgement means that we would rather remain decades behind the rest of the world, than commit to values of equality and respect of all of our citizens. Progress is not about the many mega buildings we are currently putting up in this country. Nor does it mean the many new highways, ports, airports, and so on that are being built at a dizzying speed. Progress must mean, that we commit to respecting and protecting the rights of all our citizens. This also means cultivating an understanding of the struggles of marginalized groups like the LGBTIQ community. Throughout history, there has been a complete disregard for the services rendered to society by the LGBTIQ community including in the military, in government, in sports, in the arts and in all walks of life. LGBTIQ politicians hide their sexuality in the hopes that it won’t be held against them in an election. LGBTIQ persons in the military hide their status or face a court martial and a dishonourable discharge. LGBTIQ sportsmen and women hide their sexuality to enable them to be picked to represent our country.   
  • As a nation, we must strive to stand up for each other’s rights

  • Services rendered by LGBTIQ community at large were forgotten

Why is hiding, such a huge part of our lives? Why is hiding who we are, the expected norm in this country for those like us? The enormous effort it takes to always stay one step ahead of being outed, being made to feel shame and fearful of how hard our lives would end up being if we were to be out and proud, takes a huge toll on one’s physical, mental and emotional self. Forced into heterosexual marriages by parents so ashamed of their children they would do anything to redeem themselves by forcing a life of misery on their child. All we are taught growing up is that being LGBTIQ is a sickness, a perversion. Something that must be hidden from others.
Thanks to old Victorian values brought in by the British along with their insidious laws, we have become a nation of prudes and hypocrites, embracing what is not ours and shunning what is naturally ours from the dawn of time!  

Those in power have the ability to shape societal values and public opinions and foster an accepting and tolerant attitude towards discriminated groups. This can be done by pushing for equal rights that do not leave out certain individuals and groups, and by acknowledging the value and services given by the LGBTIQ community that adds to our development as a progressive society. As a nation, we must strive to stand up for each other’s rights and understand that to become a progressive country, we need to be united in our efforts. One does not need to belong in the LGBTIQ community to support equality, but one must simply believe in an individual’s rights to freedom from discrimination and harassment and basic human rights. When the leadership of a country does not do enough to help its’ vulnerable citizens, we must all step up to the plate and make our voices heard. We must make sure that the rights of the people are enshrined and protected, no matter who, no matter what. As citizens we mustn’t ignore the plight of minorities. To do so is to encourage widespread discrimination and violence.  
Join us for Colombo PRIDE 2018 - a celebration of Diversity with Pride.

Israeli army kills Palestinian near fence in southern Gaza


Another Palestinian was wounded while allegedly attempting to cross into Israel

More than 125 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since 30 March (AFP)

Monday 4 June 2018 
Israeli forces reportedly shot and killed a Palestinian and wounded another near the fence separating the southern Gaza Strip from Israel on Monday.
The Israeli army claimed in a statement that "two terrorists who damaged the security fence and were armed with an axe" attempted an “infiltration” into Israel.
Soldiers "fired towards the terrorists, killing one of them", the statement added.
The army circulated a picture of an axe lying on the ground near the border.


A short while ago, IDF troops thwarted an attempted infiltration from the Strip into Israeli territory by two terrorists who damaged the security fence and were armed with an axe.

While the statement did not specify what happened to the second Palestinian, an Israeli army spokesperson later told Middle East Eye that he was injured but not captured by Israeli forces.
The spokesperson told MEE they were not aware of any Israeli injuries during the incident.
As of Monday afternoon, Gaza's health ministry told MEE it did not have any information on the case.
Al-Aqsa TV, affiliated with Gaza's ruling party, Hamas, published a video allegedly filmed on Monday showing a group of young men east of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, some of them using wire cutters to breach the fence.
They then approach a military post and hurl what appears to be a petrol bomb at it, before running back into Gaza.
The video did not show anyone getting shot nor wielding an axe, but an eyewitness said one of the men was hit as he tried to flee, with the body taken by Israeli forces, according to AFP.
The video said the operation was revenge for the killing of Razan al-Najjar, a 21-year-old female medic shot dead by Israeli forces in southern Gaza on Friday.



| شبان يشعلون النيران بمعدات قوات الاحتلال بعد قصهم السلك الزائل شرق خانيونس ثأراً للشهيدة رزان النجار
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Monday’s death brings to 125 the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli fire in Gaza since March 30, the first day of the Great March of Return protests, which have continued unabated for over two months as Palestinian refugees living in the besieged enclave have called for their right of return to their original villages now lying in present-day Israel.
The vast majority have been killed during weeks of protests along the border, while a few were killed while allegedly carrying out attacks or in Israeli air strikes.
No Israelis have been killed.
Protests peaked on 14 May when at least 61 people were killed as tens of thousands demonstrated ahead of Nakba Day, marking the 70th anniversary of the displacement of some 750,000 Palestinians during the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948.
The demonstration took place on the same day as the United States moved its embassy in Israel in Jerusalem, a move that was widely denounced as recognising Israel’s claims to the city as its capital to the detriment of Palestinian claims to Jerusalem.
More than two million Palestinians are packed into Gaza, a narrow coastal enclave where unemployment is high and poverty widespread.
Israel withdrew its troops and settlers from Gaza in 2005, but maintains a tight blockade since 2007. Egypt also restricts movement in and out of Gaza on its border.

Norway gives “green light” to boycotts of Israel’s settlements


Calls for a boycott of Israel were made during a recent demonstration in Oslo. 
 Ryan Rodrick BeilerActiveStills

Adri Nieuwhof- 4 June 2018
Municipalities which boycott Israel’s illegal settlements do not violate Norway’s international obligations, a foreign ministry official has insisted, dealing a blow to right-wing parties that tried to have two such municipal boycotts rescinded.
Audun Halvorsen, state secretary at the foreign ministry, said early May that a boycott of “goods and services produced in settlements does not contradict Norway’s international commitments.”
His comments came after three right-wing parties had appealed boycotts in Trondheim and Tromsø.
Three local right-wing opposition parties filed a complaint with the Tromsø county governor’s office, requesting a ruling on the resolution’s legality. In addition, the World Jewish Congress urged the Norwegian government to oppose Trondheim’s settlement boycott.
But the attempts to block the local settlement boycotts have failed with Halvorsen’s comments to Tromsø county that such boycotts did not contradict international trade law.
Indeed, international juristsHuman Rights Watch and Amnesty International have been clear that governments which facilitate or engage in any trade in or with the settlements do not fulfill their human rights obligations.

Apartheid, not conflict

Halvorsen added that the Norwegian government does not recommend municipal boycotts because it is not “an appropriate means of resolving the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians.”
Using the term “conflict” conceals Israel’s establishment of an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people, however. The 2017 UN report “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid” left no doubt about the apartheid character of Israel’s policies and practices towards the Palestinians.
Norway, just like many European states, has close ties with Israel and Norway’s embassy in Israel boasts on its website that “cultural exchange, scientific collaboration, and trade are also growing.”
Norway has a legal obligation under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court to act immediately to end the crime of apartheid. It should refuse to aid Israel in maintaining apartheid.
A boycott of settlement products would be a small step.
“The ministry’s statement confirms what we have said all along,” Jane Filseth Andersen, a representative of the organization Norwegian People’s Aid told The Electronic Intifada.
Banning the procurement of illegal settlement goods and services is neither a violation of Norway’s international trade obligations nor any other obligation under international law, Andersen said.
Halvorsen’s statement should be seen “as a green light” for similar resolutions in other councils, some of whom have been waiting to see how the ruling would turn out, she added.
Norwegian People’s Aid will follow this up through its local branches and “encourage as many municipal councils as possible” to pass similar resolutions.

Trump says he has ‘absolute right’ to pardon himself of federal crimes but denies any wrongdoing

Professor Louis Seidman, an expert in constitutional law, explains how President Trump could use his executive privilege to pardon himself or others. 



President Trump on Monday asserted an “absolute right” to pardon himself of any federal crimes but said he has no reason to do so because he has not engaged in any wrongdoing.

“As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” Trump wrote on Twitter.

As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong? In the meantime, the never ending Witch Hunt, led by 13 very Angry and Conflicted Democrats (& others) continues into the mid-terms!

In a subsequent tweet Monday, Trump also claimed that the appointment of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election had been “totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL!”

“Despite that, we play the game because I, unlike the Democrats, have done nothing wrong! Trump said.

The appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Despite that, we play the game because I, unlike the Democrats, have done nothing wrong!
President Trump's lawyers suggested in a January memo Trump could pardon himself. The letter sparked questions about a president's pardon power. 

Trump’s assessment of his pardon powers echoed that of his attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who offered an expansive view of the president’s executive powers during interviews Sunday, arguing that Trump probably has the ability to pardon himself.

“He probably does,” Giuliani said Sunday, when asked on ABC News’s “This Week” whether Trump has the ability to pardon himself. “He has no intention of pardoning himself, but he probably — not to say he can’t.”

Giuliani’s comments came less than 24 hours after the revelation Saturday that the president’s legal team argued in a confidential January memo to Mueller that Trump could not have obstructed an FBI probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election because, as president, he has total control over all federal investigations.

In his tweets Monday, Trump again lashed out at Mueller’s probe, calling it a “never ending Witch Hunt,” asserting that it was led by “13 Angry and Conflicted Democrats (& others)” and predicting that it would continue through the midterm elections.

Mueller is a Republican, as is Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, a Trump appointee overseeing Mueller’s investigation.

Legal scholars differ on the issue of whether the president can pardon himself — and even some Republicans question the reading of the law by Trump’s legal team.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) suggested Monday that Trump should hire a new lawyer if he is being told he can pardon himself.

“If I were president of the United States, and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardon myself, I think I would hire a new lawyer,” Grassley told CNN.

The question of whether a president can self-pardon has long been a “parlor game” among scholars, said Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University Law School.
There is no precedent for it and, thus, no case law. Turley said he believes a president can pardon himself — but added that it would not protect a president from impeachment.

“A president cannot pardon out of an impeachment,” Turley said. Congress, he said, “can use his pardon as an abuse of his office.”

Ethan Leib, a professor at Fordham Law School, said he believes a president can’t self-pardon because that violates the oath of office — in which the president swears to “faithfully execute” his duties — and the stipulation in Article II of the Constitution that the president “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”

“The Constitution is clearly prohibiting the president from engaging in self-dealing,” Leib said.
Trump did not say in his tweets why he believes the Mueller probe is unconstitutional.

Late last month, Steven Calabresi, one of the founders of the conservative Federalist Society, argued in a guest editorial in the Wall Street Journal that Mueller cannot oversee such a broad investigation because he was not confirmed by the Senate.

Calabresi asserted that under the appointments clause of the Constitution, an official overseeing the probe would be a “principal officer” and would have to be someone who was appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

Among those pushing back on that view Monday were Rep. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

“The appointment of Special Counsel Mueller is clearly constitutional,” Nadler said in a statement in which he referenced a top former Trump campaign aide who has been indicted by Mueller. “We know this, in part because Paul Manafort — the president’s old campaign manager — tried the same desperate argument in federal court last month. The court rejected that motion, and Manafort will rightly face trial for his alleged crimes in due course.”

With Trump going on Twitter again to undermine the Mueller probe, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) sought to bolster its legitimacy.

In a tweet directed at Trump on Monday, Schumer wrote: “Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation has either indicted or secured guilty pleas from 19 people and three companies. Five of these people, including three former Trump aides, have already pleaded guilty.”

Other Democrats, including Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), also took aim at Trump in response to his assertions on Twitter.

“All the tweeting in the world will not change the fact that the President is not above the law,” Shaheen said in a tweet of her own.

Trump’s tweet about his pardon power comes as he has issued a string of pardons of others, most recently conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza.

As he pardoned D’Souza last week for a campaign finance law violation, Trump also said he was weighing commuting the prison sentence of former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich (D) as well as granting a pardon to Martha Stewart, the television personality and lifestyle mogul, arguing that they and D’Souza had been unfairly treated by the justice system.

Many have seen Trump’s actions as a signal to personal attorney Michael Cohen, former national security adviser Michael Flynn and others ensnared in Trump-related investigations that they, too, could be spared punishment in the future.

Trump also used Twitter on Monday to mark his 500th day in office. In an earlier tweet, he said he had “accomplished a lot — many believe more than any President in his first 500 days.” The president ticked off accomplishments, including “Best Economy & Jobs EVER.”
Joel Achenbach, Devlin Barrett and Ashley Parker contributed to this report.