Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, May 25, 2018

#BoycottHNB campaign takes off after bank sacks Tamils for commemorating Mullivaikkal

Home25May 2018
A boycott campaign has taken off in the North-East with customers of Sri Lanka's Hatton National Bank (HNB) closing their accounts, after the bank suspended two employees at its Kilinochchi branch for holding a remembrance event on May 18.
Across various social media platforms, customers of the bank have been posting letters they have written to their branch managers requesting their account be closed after the incident was reported earlier this week.
“Your decision… shows your dominant attitude against innocent Tamil people,” read one letter written in English. “The whole world knows that our people were killed in thousands.”
Last week, staff at the Kilinochchi branch held a remembrance event on May 18 to remember the tens of thousands massacred by Sri Lankan state forces during the end of the armed conflict. The bank responded by suspending two employees and stated it “takes very seriously any sentiment or act that is in violation of, or poses a threat to the morale of citizens of Sri Lanka”.

JVP jigsaw to President, PM


Speaker Karu Jayasuriya and Parliament Secretary General Dhammika Dasanayake receiving the 20th Amendment from JVP Leader and Chief Opposition Whip Anura Kumara Dissanayake yesterday

  • Insists both Sirisena and Wickremesinghe must publicly reveal their stance on the abolition of the Executive Presidency
  • Hands over 20th Amendment to Speaker and Parliament SG
  • JVP looks for speedy passage or further dialogue if all are sincere 
  • Says proposed 20th Amendment as there was very little opportunity for a  new Constitution
logoBy Skandha Gunasekara-Saturday, 26 May 2018 

The 20th Amendment to the Constitution, presented by the JVP, will be sent by Parliament to the Attorney General and the Prime Minister.

Chief Opposition Whip and leader of the JVP Anura Kumara Dissanayake handed over the 20 Amendment to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya and Parliament Secretary General Dhammika Dasanayake at the Parliament complex yesterday.

The 20th Amendment seeks to completely abolish the Executive Presidency.

Addressing the media soon after meeting with the Speaker, MP Dissanayake said that now both President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe must publicly reveal their stance on the abolition of the Executive Presidency.

The JVP leader went on to say that if the Government had genuine need in fulfilling its election promise of doing away with the Executive Presidency, it can ensure the Amendment is passed by Parliament as fast as possible.

“It can be delayed if the Government has no intereste. We are ready for a broad discussion with all political parties and are prepared to accommodate amendments as necessary. We are open to constructive criticism,” he said.

MP Dissanayake said that the JVP decided to bring in the 20th amendment as they had realised that there was very little opportunity for the establishment of a new Constitution.

“Since the new Constitution is a distant reality, our effort is to push for more democratic reforms. The Executive Presidency has created many unwanted problems over the country’s history. Excessive Presidential powers have eroded all democratic institutions. Parliament is a mere rubber stamp and the Cabinet of Ministers has been reduced to puppets under the Executive Presidency. Even the Judiciary could be influenced. Since the day the Executive Presidency came into being, there has been a strong voice against it. All successive Presidents who came to power after 1994 pledged to abolish it in their election manifestoes. This was one of the main election slogans of the Common Candidate Sirisena. This Government cannot get away from this undertaking. We challenge the two leaders at the top to announce in public their positions on the abolition of the Executive Presidency” he said.

After receiving the Attorney General’s approval, the 20th Amendment bill has to be gazetted before being presented to Parliament for debate.

LANDMARK IN SRI LANKA’S WORK ON ANTI-CORRUPTION

Example of new prosecutorial independence in country:
Result of legal independence under Constitution:

In remarks to the United Nations this week, a Sri Lankan anti-corruption official said the recent arrests of two senior government officials was an example of a new prosecutorial independence in Sri Lanka, Director General of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption Sarath Jayamanne said.
“This not only demonstrated the independence of our body, but also the policy of non-interference,” he said. Jayamanne was speaking at the U.N. General Assembly in New York on Wednesday.
“These arrests marked a landmark in our work on anti-corruption, as this was the highest ranking official to have been arrested, while in office in 60 years,” he said.
Earlier this month, detectives arrested the President’s Chief of Staff I.H.K. Mahanama, and State Timber Corporation Chairman Piyadasa Dissanayake, on the charge of soliciting a bribe.
Jayamanne said the investigation was a direct result of new legal independence under the Constitution.
“The 19th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka was one of the first steps taken by a new administration in 2015 stating their commitment to democracy, good governance, independence of the judiciary, and the rule of law,” he said. “This amendment established independent commissions namely: the Judicial Services, Police, Public Service, Human Rights, Elections, Finance, Audit and, of course the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption.”
In a separate panel, Chairman of the Special Presidential Task Force on Recovery of State Assets J. C. Weliamuna said that further reform was stalled, however, by retroactive elements held over from previous governments.
He proposed creating a U.N. Working Group to examine “post state capture” realities in relation to fragile governance structures and bureaucracies.
In a press release, the Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the U.N. in New York said that Director General Jayamanne had met with John Brandolino, Director of the Division of Treaty Affairs of the UNODC, on the sidelines of the conference.
They agreed to hold a global meeting of experts in Colombo in July, “in recognition of the active role on anti-corruption played by Sri Lanka,” the Mission said.
The U.N. General Assembly adopted the Convention against Corruption in 2003, and it went into force two years later. Sri Lanka ratified it in 2004, one of the first states to do so.
The treaty requires countries to implement anti-corruption measures such as prevention, law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, technical assistance and information exchange.

Celebrating A Life Well Served

By Mithila Narendran –
Mithila Narendran
logoDuty, reliability, honour, dignity, respect: these are all qualities that my father Late Dr Rajasingham Narendran not only held in high esteem, but practised every day during his time on this earth.
He was a serious intellectual and a firm believer in discipline but he could never resist the opportunity to have a laugh and unwind with friends and loved ones. My fondest memories are of him sitting on his armchair in his sarong, bare-bodied with a can of beer and singing Carnatic ‘Thaa Tha Nithathani’, Sinhala and Tamil Baila songs ‘Suraangani’ and ‘Chinna Maamiye’ to his grand nieces and dogs.
He saw a lot during his lifetime: a country ravaged by war and ethnic hate fuelled and fanned by career politicians, an uncertain world with the Cold War, the Oil Crisis, and the Arab Spring, the cold-blooded murder of his mother and younger brother at the hands of those who were meant to keep the peace, all understandably influencing his views on the post-war world in which he raised a family.
A prolific author, writing was more than just a passion, it was in his blood. He churned out countless articles all focussing on Sri Lanka – his Home despite his harrowing experiences during the 1958, 1977 and 1983 riots – and his capacity for intellectual thought saw him being invited to join numerous reconciliation and rehabilitation endeavours by the Government of Sri Lanka.
Despite his traumatic experiences, he loved nothing more than exploring opportunities in which he could contribute to a nation that he loved and saw so much potential in. His vision for a prosperous and united Sri Lanka saw him draw up plans for an agricultural and dairy industry that would rival New Zealand and the Middle East where he worked for most of his adult life.
One of those ambitious plans was a collaborative Village Development Project in Batticaloa together with the Eelapatheeswarar Temple, London. In March 2016, he was appointed Project Consultant by the Temple Board to oversee the entire project.
Since then, he spent most of his waking hours strategizing, planning and implementing his ideas for elevating the socio-economic profile of two low-income villages by empowering the people to ensure sustainable development. Once completed, the villages will have a fully-functioning private school, 4-acre sports stadium, cabana-style hotel, IT hub, sewing centre, children’s park and an industrial estate comprising small-scale local industries such as pottery, ornaments, mats, brooms,aquarium fish-keeping etc.
A naturally empathic person, he began this project by fulfilling the desires of the villagers by building Ganesha and Pechi Amman temples. The next phase provided easy access to drinking water via bore wells to villagers who previously had to walk miles to pump water for daily use.

Read More

A Case of Blatant Abuse in thenra University of Jaffna


( May 25, 2018, Jaffna, Sri Lanka Guardian) We give, below, a case of blatant abuse in recruitment to the Department of Financial Management, Jaffna (see two attachments). The case given here is that of Mithila Gowthaman, who is outstanding by any objective measure. Those in authority seem determined to go to extraordinary lengths to keep her out.
Reconstruction and renewal of institutions in the war-torn North was a major theme that was on the lips of those who wanted it to regain some of its old glory in education. The University of Jaffna was isolated during the war and a few individuals had a free hand in awarding academic positions to their favourites, irrespective of merit. It was a major threat to the integrity of the University. Without a functioning university worth its name, the North was condemned to remain an intellectual desert.
In a bid to check this, the Jaffna University Science Teachers’ Association compiled cases of many abuses with evidence drawn largely from Council Minutes. As mentioned in the Appeal, the compiled volume was given to the Council, to the present and former UGC Chairmen and at least two ministers in charge of Higher Education. This effort was snubbed.
One of the faculties where abuse abounded was the Faculty of Management, which presently has the case of Ravivathani dragging on in the Supreme Court.
The fact that these abuses are allowed to continue with impunity is a measure of the step-motherly treatment the University of Jaffna receives from the authorities in Colombo as well as from our own Parliamentary representatives. It shows that they are comfortable with the rot that has been allowed to set in, which acts as a foolproof precedent to those determined to abuse authority.
Please take up this matter with any of your contacts who could have a benign impact on the state of the University.
Attached also is the letter from the Head of Department, whose courage in her decision to stand up speaks for itself.

Treasury bond scams:
Dayasiri admits receiving Rs. 1 mn from firm under probe

...urges AG to reveal names of others who had taken money from Aloysius




article_image
Dayasiri

By Saman Indrajith- 

UPFA MP Dayasiri Jayasekara yesterday admitted in Parliament that he received one million rupee Cheque from Walt & Row Associates.

Making a statement in Parliament he said that there had been a newspaper report to the effect that he had obtained the cash cheque from Walt & Row associated with Perpetual Treasuries.

He said he did nothing wrong in accepting the funds which he had used for his electioneering to seek a Parliament seat. Jayasekara said that he was the Chief Minister of Wayamba Province when the sponsor money was given to him. 

"Not only those who are in Parliament, or provincial councillors, but the trader in the village helps the Pradeshiya Sabha member. "That is how the country’s politics work. Therefore, some of the businessmen do help us, they have done so even at the Provincial Council elections, General Elections and the Presidential Elections as well. It is traditional that the business community helps politicians at every election," Jayasekara said.

He however noted that he was not a COPE Committee member at the time and was appointed to parliament only on August 17, 2015.

He said that the news report stated that based on a statement given to the CID by a police officer who was attached to Jayasekara’s security in 2015, on June 13, 2015 Jayasekara had asked his security officer, Amila Kumara Herath, to encash a cash cheque (Bearing number 566635) which was issued by Walt & Row Associates (under the current account number 0073900773). The said security officer had told the CID that he had encashed the cheque from a Kurunegala Bank and handed the Money ‘in cash’ to Jayasekara.

Jayasekara said that at every instance he had stood up against Arjun Mahendran’s illegal acts both at the COPE Committee and the parliament. "Hence, what is important is who we represented and in this instance, this cheque is not one that was written in my name. I inquired about this but have no recollection of who gave it and who encashed it. I am truly unaware if Arjun Aloysius had signed this cheque or who had signed it. But we had encashed this cheque and utilised that money for our election campaign," Jayasekara admitted in parliament yesterday joining the parliamentary debate over several orders under the Appropriation Act.

He said there were many who had taken money from Arjun Aloysius and he could reveal those names and urged authorities to take measures to reveal the identities of those who had accepted money from Arjun Aloysius and table in parliament the balance 3000 page report on the Bond scam.

He said that he had never worked to safeguard Arjun Aloysius and clear him from the allegations the latter faced.

This is a smear campaign that has been unleashed against him after he and 15 others had opted to step out of the government, he said

"We have not taken money from Arjun Aloysius and tried to protect him. I never wrote books on the Bond scam and never went to court on behalf of Arjun Aloysius and neither represented him nor tried to stop the investigation," he added.

Police suspect underworld involvement in death of cricketer's father



RUWAN LAKNATH JAYAKODY-AM MAY 25 2018

Several teams of detectives are investigating the killing of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia Municipal Councilor K. Ranjan de Silva alias Mahathun, who is also the Father of Sri Lanka Cricket National Team Player Dhananjaya de Silva.

According to what the Police have pieced together, de Silva and two others were seated outside his house on a bench along Sri Gnanendra Road (also known as the Sea Beach Road) in Ratmalana on Thursday (24) evening when three men walked towards them along the road and one of them allegedly opened fire using a T-56 assault rifle. All three were hit and fell and the shooter is said to have walked up to de Silva and fired several shots at close range.

The shooting had taken place around 8.30pm.

The Councilor was rushed to the Kalubowila Teaching Hospital where he passed away several hours later. He was 62 years old.

Mount Lavinia Police are conducting investigations in this regard. The motive for the killing and the identity of the gunmen are not yet known.
Police told CeylonToday that they were investigating whether a local underworld character was involved in the killing.

The deceased was also the father of Former Dehiwala-Mt. Lavinia Municipal Councilor Savithra de Silva.

Since the shooting had taken place on the eve of the National Cricket Team’s departure to the West Indies for a test match series, Dhananjaya, the 26-year-old batsman and son of the deceased withdrew from the tour. Sri Lanka Cricket has not taken a replacement for the talented youngster who is a joint fastest to a thousand runs in Test Cricket hoping that he could join the squad later.


Detectives interview witnesses as Dhananjaya looks on

Chinese Dream & “Splendid Pearl” – Part-II

Undoubtedly at the outset it must be said from the experience and lessons learned before and after the departure of imperialists from Sri Lanka,  China has shown the characteristics of a genuine friend willing  to extend much needed financial support to develop Sri Lankan economy and bring prosperity to her people. China is the largest contributor of FDI in Sri Lanka. However, it appears that the politicians have not been forthright when dealing with China and it is questionable whether Sri Lankan operatives are capable of handling the massive inflow of FDI from China. When establishing international relationships, it appears that political leaders; both current and former regimes have been guided equally by personnel greed of corrupt politicians and senior officials. The people should not forget and forgive “Mr. Ten percent” of the former regime roaming the country with a grin from ear to ear easily. 
Ongoing power struggle shows that they are more interested in their own survival and preserving vested interests and political base. Hence, they always shoot from the hip; by conveniently introducing the interests of former imperialists, India, Japan, Singapore or other western country into the picture. Objectives of ECTA with India and FTA with Singapore are questionable especially when these agreements do not support any substantial or meaningful job creation in the country.  It is also an excuse to prolong the status quo that has been successfully carried out for the last 70 years by successive failed governments and allow politicians to become billionaires through get rich quick schemes.  
According to a statement released by the Chinese Ambassador in Sri Lanka recently “that certain external forces are provoking unfounded speculation on joint mega-projects between Sri Lanka and China in order to disrupt the cooperation and create problems between the two countries in order to further their own interests”. Daily Mirror May 9th 2018.
Interestingly, the Ambassador has expressed these views to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya. Being a businessman and astute politician Mr. Jayasuriya may have fully understood the underlying message and gravity of the point made by the Ambassador.
Furthermore according to the Ambassador  “Work on the Colombo Port City Project, the Hambantota Port as well as the economic corridors connecting Colombo to Hambantota and Kandy are progressing rapidly with our joint efforts,” 
As expected, they are projects that would enable our island nation to play a key role to ensure that Maritime Silk Road become a very successful mega project of this century affecting global trade and well being of millions of peoples. Irony is that Speaker Karu Jayasuriya’s political party UNP was the main perpetrator responsible for seeding poisonous and wrong messages about Chinese projects in Sri Lanka in order to win the elections in January and August 2015. Unfortunately, the Chinese leaders have to deal with these Machiavellian politicians in Sri Lanka. 
The motive behind China’s decision to conduct friendly and pragmatic cooperation with Sri Lanka is embedded in the overall strategy linked to the Maritime Silk Road. The problems lie within handful of Machiavellian political leaders in Sri Lanka.  
Why China is the best Development Partner for Sri Lanka?
Chinas’ foreign policy has been established on the cardinal principle of non interference in the internal affairs of other countries. This policy of “Non interference” is the cornerstone of China’s vibrant economy and it supported immensely to achieve its goal in the global market. In 2007, Chinese foreign ministry clearly stated and emphasized what really drives China’s foreign relationships and diplomatic philosophy with the following eight-point statement.  

Read More

Children in Israeli detention suffer scars for life


Muhammad Tamimi
 (Annelies Verbeek)
Annelies Verbeek- 25 May 2018
Muhammad Tamimi sat on the couch, occasionally laughing nervously as he described what had happened to him.
“Not that many journalists have come this time,” he said. “Just you and a Palestinian film crew. Hopefully there will not be any more.”
The 15-year-old has been held in military detention three times now, an experience that many Palestinian children suffer and that has healthcare professionals warning of lifelong trauma.
Muhammad’s latest detention came on the morning of Sunday, 20 May, when he went to the supermarket in Nabi Saleh, his village in the occupied West Bank, to buy groceries. He noticed a white car in front of his uncle’s house from which two young men emerged.
When Muhammad approached, the men grabbed him from behind and pulled him into the car.
“They pointed a gun at me, so I would not scream or call for help,” Muhammad said, recounting the short but frightening drive. When they stopped at the military watchtower near Nabi Saleh, he understood that he had been taken by Israeli undercover forces.
There, the military commander in charge of the area of Nabi Saleh and nearby Beit Rima, told his captors to keep him. “He said I would not be going home,” Muhammad recalled.
He was then transported to an Israeli military base near the town of Aboud. “They beat me everywhere, very hard,” Muhammad said. “They were wearing boots, they hit me on my back, my hands, my head.”
The Israeli army handed him over to Palestinian security forces at night, after Muhammad’s family managed to convey to the army that the boy needed to take his medicine.

Scarred for life

Muhammad is still recovering from a head injury he sustained in December last year when an Israeli soldier shot him in the face with a rubber-coated steel bullet in protests following the announcement of the US embassy move to Jerusalem.
In the six-hour operation that followed the injury, the surgeons had to remove a large part of his skull to relieve pressure on the brain.
This was the third time the army has detained Muhammad. He was first taken from his home at the age of 13 and served a three-month prison sentence. The Israelis then arrested him again in a night raid in February, just two months after his injury and still awaiting restorative surgery.
“Even if Muhammad is never arrested again, he will be alert every second of his life. Always ready to be taken again,” Murad Amro from the Palestinian Counseling Center in Ramallah explained. “It is the military’s way of teaching children a lesson, inflicting a sort of psychosocial handicap from a young age.”
Addameer, the prisoners rights group, reports that as of April 2018, Israel is holding more than 300 Palestinian children, of whom 65 are under the age of 16.
Statistics gathered by Defense for Children International Palestine find that in 2017, almost 75 percent of detained children reported physical violence during arrest.
Several members of the extended Tamimi family have been detained in the recent past. The most high profile of them is Muhammad’s cousin Ahed Tamimi, who was sentenced to eight months imprisonment in March.
Ahed, then aged 16, was arrested after she confronted Israeli soldiers outside her home in Nabi Saleh last December. The confrontation occurred on the same day that Muhammad was shot in the head.
Murad Amro said that the way a child reacts to the trauma of arrest can vary. The reaction is connected to a number of factors, like socioeconomic background, family dynamics and predisposition.
“However, we generally observe that childhood detention has a severe impact on the functioning of a child and family structure,” Amro explained. “A child after detention is not the same child.”

Deliberate psychological abuse

Samah Jabr is a Palestinian psychiatrist and psychotherapist and an author of the book Derrière les fronts(Behind the Fronts), which deals with the military occupation’s impact on mental health in Palestine.
“Adolescence in itself is a dangerous place,” she told The Electronic Intifada.
Adolescents, she said, are more impulsive. They tend to engage in more high risk activities than adults. In Palestine, those activities are likely to involve confrontations with soldiers “especially because soldiers provoke children,” Jabr added.
“Recently, the Israelis reduced the age of responsibility to 12,” she said, meaning that children at a vulnerable and impulsive age are treated as adults in Israeli military courts.
During every stage of detention, the child experiences a number of shocks. The first is to be taken from home by soldiers and to see that parents are powerless in front of the Israeli military.
“Your parents are the ones that discipline you, try to control your behavior and claim to protect you,” Jabr said. “It is a shock for the child to see that when there is a real need for protection, the parents are helpless.”
Then children often endure severe abuse on the way to the interrogation center. “The child is beaten, humiliated, sometimes bitten by dogs, sometimes soldiers piss on him or her,” Jabr said.
Interrogators also attempt to make children believe that society has betrayed them, Jabr said, for instance by saying a child’s name was given to soldiers by friends or classmates. At the same time, interrogators might try to induce guilt by threatening to demolish the home or harass the child’s siblings.
“Sometimes, they bring belongings from home to the interrogation, just to show the child their ability to reach family members,” Jabr said.
Such psychological pressure pushes many children to sign confessions in Hebrew they do not understand.
When Muhammad Tamimi was arrested last February, he signed a confession within hours of his arrest, stating that his injury was not caused by a bullet but a bike accident. The statement was patently signed under duress and he later told journalists that the soldiers beat him into confession.

Learned helplessness

The psychological pain does not end after release. When a child returns home from prison, there are celebrations. But Jabr explained that children themselves can suffer from the ambivalence of the experience.
“There is a tendency to amplify the child’s sacrifice – to glorify him or her as a hero,” Jabr said. “Meaning there is no space for the child to talk about the pain and shame. Children often feel guilty because they confessed or gave names.”
“The parents themselves also feel guilty, because they could not prevent what happened,” Jabr said. “The whole family system is disturbed by the experience.”
Jabr also emphasized that every child reacts differently to detention. Not all children display symptoms of trauma, and there are countless psychosocial factors at play.
“Some become submissive,” Jabr explained, “others will want to identify with the physically stronger group, the soldiers. Others will be very angry and engage in even more high risk activities. It is the last group that is more likely to end up in prison again.”
Jabr explained that children can come out of prison suspicious of others, as they were told by interrogators that society betrayed them.
The children have learned from the experience that the structures around them cannot protect them. Many find it hard to adapt again and obey social norms and many drop out of school after detention.
For his part, Muhammad puts up a brave front. After three arrests, he is not scared anymore, he told The Electronic Intifada.
His mother, Imtithal Tamimi, tells a slightly different story. Sunday night, for instance, he slept in his older brother’s bed.
“He is afraid to sleep alone,” she said.
Home to almost two million Palestinians, the majority of whom are long-term refugees, Gaza is one of the most crowded places on Earth
Gaza is bordered to the south by Egypt, to the north and east by Israel and to the west by the Mediterranean sea

1. Where is Gaza?

Friday 25 May 2018
Gaza is home to almost two million Palestinians, the majority of whom are long-term refugees (a further 3.25 million Palestinians live in the West Bank). It’s been run by Hamas since elections in 2007: the group is designated as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and the EU among others. The West Bank is governed by the Palestinian Authority, which is currently controlled by Fatah, rivals of Hamas.


2. The event that changed Palestinians

The dominant event for Palestinians in Gaza during the past century has been the Nakba of 1948, when hundreds of thousands were driven from, or else fled, their homes in what is now modern-day Israel as the state came into existence. The right of return to ancestral homes (or "Haq al-Awda") is the over-riding long-term priority for many Palestinians: it forms part of United Nations resolution 194.

3. Palestinians recall what was lost

Palestinian houses and cinemas, shops and mosques, train stations and markets were all lost in 1948. Tarek Bakri, a researcher and archivist based in Jerusalem, started to collect archive photography which documented these losses. The image below slides left and right: MEE has published more examples.
Above: Israelis looting houses in the Palestinian neighbourhood of Musrara in Jerusalem. Musrara is one of the oldest neighbourhood built outside Jerusalem's Old City walls in the 1860s. 

4. Gaza since 1948

The seven decades after the Nakba have been ones of turmoil and crisis for the residents of Gaza, including occupationuprisings and Israeli military operations

Read More

Trump creates nightmare of a thousand Hiroshimas

 
2018-05-25
With the United States scuttling the Iran nuclear deal and casting doubts on a possible détente with North Korea, the time is ripe once again to turn the world’s attention on nuclear disarmament and give the necessary build-up for the next Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty conference scheduled to be held in 2020. 
Though the NPT is regarded as the cornerstone of the global nuclear nonproliferation regime, its ultimate aim is total nuclear disarmament and the promotion of the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones,” said Albert Einstein, the scientist who was instrumental in the development of atomic bombs, two of which the US dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the last stages of World War II.

The presumption in the oft quoted Einstein quote is that World War III would make society collapse into the Stone Age.  But this Einstein quote seems out of touch with the gigantic destructive power of modern nuclear weapons.  For instance, the Hydrogen bomb which North Korea tested in January 2016 was one thousand times more powerful than the bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima. 
According to a LiveScience website report, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki exploded with the yield of 15 kilotons and 20 kilotons of TNT, respectively.  In contrast, the first test of a thermonuclear weapon, or hydrogen bomb, in the United States in November 1952 yielded an explosion on the order of 10,000 kilotons of TNT.  It is simply madness and criminal to keep such weapons, every one of which can destroy one thousand Hiroshimas.

But for world nuclear powers, such concerns hardly matter, for they are more concerned about enhancing their sheer military power that enables them to dominate and plunder the world.  When they speak about nuclear disarmament, they will wax eloquent about a nuclear free world and hit out at Iran and North Korea, but when it comes to their own nuclear arsenals, they continue their research to modernize their weapons in a game of one-upmanship with other nuclear powers.  
We need total disarmament. Agreements on partial disarmament – the likes of which the US and Russia have entered into in the past – are largely a farce.  

"When they speak about nuclear disarmament, they will wax eloquent about a nuclear free world and hit out at Iran and North Korea, but when it comes to their own nuclear arsenals, they continue their research to modernize their weapons in a game of one-upmanship with other nuclear powers"


The five permanent United Nations Security Council members – the US, Russia, Britain, France and China – together with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea possess more than 15,000 nuclear weapons.  The five permanent members should set an example by denouncing and dismantling their nuclear weapons before they preach disarmament.  Strangely or deliberately, Israel’s nuclear arsenal is left out of the disarmament debate. Israel is believed to possess more than 300 nuclear weapons and has drawn hardly any flak from the US.  If Israel, a country that has little respect for international law and human rights, can possess nuclear weapons, what is the big fuss about Iran or North Korea going nuclear?  The stock answer most Western analysts give is that North Korea and Iran are maverick states which have little respect for international laws and human rights and therefore they cannot be trusted with weapons that can wipe out humanity.  This is hypocrisy. Hypocrisy apart, some may argue that partial nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation are certainly better than non-disarmament and proliferation.  Therefore, they say enough is enough; no country should hereafter develop nuclear weapons. 

But Trump’s action only encourages proliferation.  By withdrawing from the Iran deal, and placing 12 more new conditions, Trump is now forcing Iran to resume its nuclear programme.  Iran’s spiritual leader Al Khamenei urged European powers to give Iran a guarantee that they would buy Iran’s oil and continue their trade links with Iran despite US sanctions. He warned, otherwise, Iran would resume its nuclear programme. But many believe that in a bid to protect their companies, the European powers could yield to US pressure, for the European Union’s trade volume with the US is 140 times its trade volume with Iran. 
Unless the Europeans work out a bypass law similar to ‘the blocking statue’ the EU nations have adopted to circumvent US sanctions on Cuba, Iran’s only option is to follow the North Korean example and develop nuclear weapons, a move that will, unfortunately, have a domino effect to prompt Saudi Arabia to start its nuclear weapons programme. 

Trump should read what eminent Sri Lankan jurist Chris Weeramanty has said about nuclear weapons. In his dissenting opinion in the famous 1996 ruling on the legality of nuclear weapons, the International Court of Justice judge Weeramantry said: 
“My considered opinion is that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is illegal in any circumstances whatsoever. It violates the fundamental principles of international law, and represents the very negation of the humanitarian concerns which underlie the structure of humanitarian law.”

Trump Has No Idea How Diplomatic Deals Work

I worked on international negotiations under Obama — and now I’m watching from the sidelines as the Trump team gets it all wrong.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in, U.S. President Donald Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un share a screen on South Korean television on May 11. (Kim Sue-han/AFP/Getty Images)

No automatic alt text available.
BY -
 

Earlier this week, the New York Times ran a remarkable story explaining all of the ways in which the Trump administration botched its high-stakes trade negotiations with China. I am not an expert on China and don’t know that much about trade, but I do know a little something about diplomatic negotiations. I was part of the team led by then-U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry that tried and failed to negotiate peace between Israelis and Palestinians from 2013 to 2014, and though I was not on the team that negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran, I was part of the small interagency group that worked on this issue in the years before negotiations got serious and watched them very closely throughout.

Based on these experiences, what was stunning to learn about the China trade negotiations was how at every step of the way, U.S. President Donald Trump’s economic team did precisely the wrong thing. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Director of Trade and Industrial Policy Peter Navarro, Chief Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow, and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross executed a textbook case study in how to not conduct international negotiations.

Failure to prepare

The key to a successful international negotiation starts before getting in the room, with preparation that gets the U.S. team on the same page. This is not easy. Any tough issue, whether it be trade with China or Iran’s nuclear program, is complicated. There are going to be disagreements among U.S. officials on the best course forward. Indeed, it is a healthy sign of a vigorous policy process. The way to prepare is for the national security bureaucracy to hold interagency meetings where the various representatives from the different agencies come together and deliberate, debate, and ultimately decide on the U.S. position and strategy. The negotiators then go out and conduct the negotiations until they get to a point where they feel they cannot make any more progress without guidance from Washington, in which case they call home or come home for further deliberations.

In the case of the China trade discussions, the team included multiple Cabinet officials. And since they clearly had fundamental disagreements, the only person with the seniority to settle the matter and provide instructions was Trump. Unfortunately, he does not bother to engage in the details and break these types of deadlocks, instead often choosing to simply listen to the last person who briefs him. And so the administration was not able to work out these disagreements in advance, and the U.S. negotiating team showed up for talks with the Chinese without a clear unified position.

This is the precise opposite of what we saw from former President Barack Obama, who, especially on the Iran nuclear negotiations, was deeply engaged in the details. Some might justifiably argue that at moments this led to micromanagement. But U.S. negotiators usually knew where the president was, and they knew how far they could go and when they needed to ask for more guidance.

What happens when differences inside the team are not settled in advance of talks? As the New York Times reported, in the middle of a session with the Chinese, Navarro and Mnuchin “stepped outside to engage in a profanity-laced shouting match.” When these divisions become apparent, a classic tactic is to exploit the wedge and find the negotiator with the most flexible position, which is precisely what the Chinese tried by zeroing in on Mnuchin. It also created confusion for the Chinese.

They did not understand the U.S. position or precisely who spoke for the United States. When that happens, your counterpart becomes very cautious and takes an inflexible negotiating position. If Mnuchin makes a promise, do the Chinese know if that commitment will survive the internal split? If not, they would fear making a major concession, only to see it pocketed by the United States before someone else on the U.S. negotiating team comes back to ask for more.

In the Obama administration, we were far from perfect on this score. During the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, there were disagreements between the National Security Council and the State Department and moments when Kerry and then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice had tough debates, including in front of Obama. There were moments late at night when sleep deprivation and total frustration got the best of even the most disciplined negotiator, and disagreements emerged among the team that counterparts could sense. But the notion of a profanity-laced tirade between two U.S. lead negotiators in front of the Israelis or Palestinians? To me that is unimaginable. (We tried to save our profanity-laced tirades for our Israeli and Palestinian friends, instead of for our own team. Especially while we were in the room with counterparts).

Leaking sensitive negotiating positions

The next classic mistake the Trump administration made during negotiations was leaking sensitive positions. There is a reason not to do this. International negotiations are tough. They require unpopular sacrifices on all sides that are likely to generate political blowback at home. Prematurely publicizing your own concessions or those of your negotiating partners gives opponents of the ammunition to immediately attack. Instead, the sounder approach is to get to a full deal that both sides can sell at home and then release the entire package at once. At that point, each side selectively chooses the good parts of the deal that they will emphasize with their domestic audience.

But that is precisely the opposite of what the administration did. It started with the president himself tweeting that the United States would consider offering economic benefits to the Chinese telecommunications firm ZTE as part of an agreement. He was trying to communicate this point to the Chinese, but that could have been done through a phone call to Chinese President Xi Jinping. It did not need to go to the Trump’s 52 million twitter followers. Immediately, the administration faced backlash from opponents on Capitol Hill, thus reducing flexibility to make a central concession that was a necessary part of the agreement with China.

The administration also leaked and then publicly stated that the Chinese were prepared to reduce their trade surplus with the United States by $200 billion. Chinese negotiators responded by denying it and started walking back from the position, as they faced attacks at home.

This stands in sharp contrast to how the Obama administration negotiated the Iran nuclear deal in almost complete secrecy. The initial talks, through Oman, happened with no public knowledge. And before the most important breakthrough — which came in April 2015 when the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, plus Germany) and Iran agreed in Lausanne, Switzerland, on a set of parameters that set the stage for the final negotiations on the accord — no one knew what the deal would include. And when the details were released, the two sides emphasized very different elements. The U.S. team focused on the fact that Iran had agreed to intrusive inspections and would only keep 661 pounds of low-enriched uranium — not enough for one nuclear weapon. The Iranians emphasized the sanctions relief and the 6,000 centrifuges it would still have spinning. Imagine if instead Obama had publicly tweeted in advance of the deal that Iran had agreed to remove all but 661 pounds of low-enriched uranium from the country. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei would have tweeted out an immediate denial, and the Iranian negotiators’ position would have hardened. Similarly, if Obama had started tweeting the specifics of sanctions relief he was willing to offer Iran, he would have faced immediate backlash from Democratic allies on the Hill, who at the time were still on the fence about the agreement.

Circular firing squad

The final disaster in Trump’s failed China negotiation was that various members of the U.S. team came out publicly with different positions. Days after the negotiations ended, Lighthizer put out a statement that was widely understood as an implicit criticism of Mnuchin. And even worse was the story in the New York Times, which was well sourced, with details that could only have come from the U.S. participants themselves. How is this team supposed to work together on this issue now? How can they trust each other after they have just finished knifing each other in the back, while also airing all of their dirty laundry for the world — and most importantly, for the Chinese — to see?

When the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations that I worked on collapsed, there was deep frustration inside the U.S. team, and some disagreements about what we should say publicly and how we could have done things differently. But it is completely unimaginable to me that the State Department and the White House would have put out conflicting press statements implicitly criticizing each other. And while all sides — the United States, the Israelis, and Palestinians — were frustrated and put out stories blaming each other, that does not compare to the New York Times expose coming only days after the talks collapsed, with all of the Americans going after each other. It is a sign of an unhealthy situation inside the U.S. negotiating team.

Negotiations are already hard — don’t make them even harder

High-stakes diplomatic negotiations are difficult. The issues are complicated. Domestic politics apply additional pressure. Even if you are the most brilliant, disciplined, cohesive negotiating team, chances are higher that you will fail rather than succeed.

Numerous administrations have made many mistakes in trying to negotiate Israeli-Palestinian peace, but even perfect U.S. negotiators might not be able to solve a problem without the right partners on both sides. And even the example of the Iran nuclear deal is not necessarily a model for success. It may have been a historic agreement that was far superior to the alternatives, but the Obama administration’s failure to build domestic support and account for the possibility of a successor who would try to tear the deal down left it vulnerable.

But what is clear is that if you do not do the very simple, basic things right, there is no way you will even get close to a major international breakthrough. The fiasco that was the China trade negotiation should leave us all very concerned. For an administration that was on the cusp of holding a high-stakes nuclear summit with North Korea, has walked away from the Iran nuclear agreement, and is still trying to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, there is no indication that Trump and his team have any clue what the “art of the deal” is about when it comes to international diplomacy.