Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Adverse weather: Casualties rise up to 11, more landslide warnings issued



 MAY 23 2018

The Disaster Management Center (DMC) says that nearly 84,943 people in 14 districts have been affected due to the heavy monsoon rain and strong winds across Sri Lanka.

Meanwhile the death toll due to the severe weather condition has also risen to 11, the DMC said in its latest update.

National Building Research Organisation has issued red notices to Rathnapura, Kegalle, Nuwara Eliye, Kaluthara, and Galle warning of potential landslide activity.

A total of 84,943persons belonging to 18,542 families are affected by the prevailing disaster situation in the country.

The DMC said that 27,621 persons from 7,526 families have been displaced and that they have been provided shelter at 194 safe locations.

The Ratnapura District is the worst affected with 24,625 people affected while 22,673 are affected in Gampaha District. People in Puttalam District (12,760) and Colombo District (7,482) have also been affected significantly.

The Department of Irrigations says that although the water levels of rivers have started to recede, if rains continue the risk of floods would return.

Presidential Elections Both sides saddled with challenges in deciding on candidates



2018-05-24

A momentum has built up in view of the next presidential election though it is not yet around the corner. The recent ‘Viyath Maga’ programme, a confab of intellectuals, business leaders and politicians with a nationalist bent, served as the virtual launching pad of a presidential election campaign. 
  • A premature poll campaign is now in the making in that sense, though the elections are scheduled to be conducted at the end of next year, as per the Constitution
  • The experiment of a common candidate was successful in 2015
  • Many believe former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa who chaired the Viyath Maga programmme would be the chosen presidential candidate
A premature poll campaign is now in the making in that sense, though the elections are scheduled to be conducted at the end of next year, as per the Constitution. But, a premature enthusiasm, created in this manner, has resulted in the two opposing political camps volleying charges against each other, targeting the individual personalities of likely candidates. 
For the anti-government political force, many believe former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa who chaired the Viyath Maga programmme would be the chosen presidential candidate. As such, he is subjected to early political assaults by those in the government, averse to his possible candidacy. 

The candidate from the UNP-led political force is not yet identified though a couple of Ministers insisted that it should be none other than Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. Whoever it may be, the UNP candidate is still aloof from political vilification because he is not yet identified in the broader sense. 

After the Viyath Maga programme, Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera was the first to make a detailed response to the event, in fact, calling it ‘Vipath Maga’ (path of destruction). Now the stage is set for political debate on the presidential election in this manner. And, some people, eagerly awaiting a presidential poll, keep posting on the social media sites, expressing themselves.
 
Be that as it may, either political camp is saddled with issues in deciding on the candidate. As far, the political forces led by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa are concerned, some leaders have publicly uttered that Gotabhaya Rajapaksa should be the candidate while the others such as MP Vasudeva Nanayakkara proposed former Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa to candidacy. It is rumoured that former Minister Basil Rajapaksa also harbours presidential ambition in this regard. Nevertheless, no one has made any public announcement to that effect. 

So, for that matter, the forces aligned with the Joint Opposition have to reconcile differences before deciding on the next candidate. According to political sources from the Joint Opposition, certain MPs such as Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila and Bandula Gunawardane remain adamant that it should be Gotabhaya Rajapaksa who should seek presidency. 

For the UNP, it is a challenging situation this time. Last time, the UNP forged ties with the political parties, groups and individuals with diverse opinions to field President Maithripala Sirisena as the common candidate. It was done for a purpose. The experiment of a common candidate was successful in 2015 in this manner. Those who stood together, had a set of targets to be achieved. In retrospect, these targets could not be realized. As such, it is now a challenging task to unite all those parties, groups and individuals again for the concept of common candidate, which was tested and failed in the opinion of those who stood for it. It is, therefore, a herculean task for the UNP-led political camp to unify all the forces for a common candidate. If it is difficult, the party will be compelled to field its own candidate. Against the backdrop, both the sides have issues to be resolved in deciding on their best bets for the presidential election. Alongside, there are those with presidential ambitions serving in the UNP at the moment. 


SLPP skeptical about SLFP move 

There is a new dimension to opposition politics hitherto led by the Joint Opposition, after 16 MPs of Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) left the government and decided to sit in the opposition. The group, functioning as a separate group in the opposition, launches frontal attacks on the UNP-led government. As such, opposition politics, so far dominated by the Joint Opposition as the main force opposed to the UNP, is sought to be shared by the SLFP group. 

This has irked some members of the Joint Opposition, particularly those having links with Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP). They perceive this as a ruse by the SLFP to carve out its niche in the collective public opinion building up against the government. Actually, President Maithripala Sirisena gave his blessings to this group to sit in the opposition though his party has not officially decided to quit the unity government with the UNP. The President, it seems, has understood that his party was relegated to a poor third at the local government elections on February 10 because of its alignment with the UNP in the unity government for the last couple of years. The SLFP is now planning to decide as a party to leave the government. Yet, it is questionable how far the SLFP will succeed in efforts to emerge as a formidable force to reckon with, in the opposition.

The SLPP, which won the local polls, is skeptical about the move by the SLFP group. The SLPP also faces pressure from its rank and file not to accommodate these SLFPers. As such, its chairman Prof. G.L. Peiris announced at a press conference that it would contest all future elections under its lotus bud symbol and the leadership of the former President. He tried to drive home the message that the SLFP, if it wanted, could become a party to a broad alliance led by the SLPP under the lotus bud symbol in the future. In other words, the SLFP can only become an appendage to the SLPP at future elections. 
Those who stood together, had a set of targets to be achieved. In retrospect, these targets could not be realized. As such, it is now a challenging task to unite all those parties, groups and individuals again for the concept of common candidate
Talks are actually underway for such a broad electoral front in the future. In a step towards this, the group was to meet with former President Rajapaksa last evening. 

In the meantime, the leaders of the political parties in the Joint Opposition met with Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa to discuss, among others, steps for a series of protest rallies against the government. The Joint Opposition will mount such a campaign to protest against the government over the rising cost of living, the fuel price revision, the postponement of the Provincial Council Elections etc. 

Amidst talks about the possible candidates for the next presidential elections, the public attention is being drawn to another move - the exercise to abolish the executive presidency. 

The JVP, a party commanding the support of six MPs, is working it out to be presented to Parliament as a private member’s bill. 

It is learnt that the bill is drafted in collusion with some in the government. The end target of this exercise is to avoid the next presidential election, enabling the election of the President through Parliament only. 

The country is experiencing a unique political development in that sense. On one hand, there is enthusiasm for the presidential election in some quarters. On the other hand, efforts are underway to abolish the executive presidency.   

Unity best Unity best sooner

Picture by Hirantha Gunathilaka
Picture by Hirantha Gunathilaka

Thursday, May 24, 2018

It is an understatement to say that the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) is in crisis. It is a peculiar predicament that the party finds itself in, given that it is in power and its leader, Maithripala Sirisena is Executive President and Head of State of the country. Ironically though, President Sirisena does not appear to have the same degree of control over the political party he heads.

The SLFP has seen and survived much political turmoil in its history, most notably in the ’80s when there was a leadership squabble between Sirima Bandaranaike and Maithripala Senanayake. However, most of these disputes have arisen when it was in the opposition. Indeed, even the United National Party (UNP) went through a series of internal power struggles when it was in the opposition between 1994 and 2014. What makes the current impasse in the SLFP unusual is that it is happening when it is in government.

Last week, it was reported that President Sirisena had instructed the sixteen parliamentarians who recently left the government and sat on the opposition benches in Parliament to decide when the SLFP would quit the national unity government it has forged with the UNP.

The reason for the current state of affairs in the SLFP could be attributed at least in part to the circumstances of President Sirisena’s election to office. After being the longest serving General Secretary of the SLFP and having held that office for fourteen years, he quit the party to take on the seemingly invincible Mahinda Rajapaksa as the ‘common candidate’ of a broad coalition that was headed by the SLFP’s arch rivals, the UNP.

SLFP parliamentarians

Once in office, President Sirisena became leader of the SLFP. He then had a difficult balancing act to perform, managing his role as SLFP leader in a government which he headed but was dominated by the UNP. In doing so, he found that a significant proportion of SLFP parliamentarians still remained loyal to Rajapaksa.

That number has been steadily increasing. At the August 2015 general election, the United Peoples Freedom Alliance (UPFA) of which the major stake holder is the SLFP returned 95 MPs. Of them, 51 were loyal to Rajapaksa while 44 pledged allegiance to President Sirisena. Those 44 MPs, along with the 106 MPs from the UNP gave the government a two-thirds majority in Parliament.

The tally now stands at only about 23 MPs supporting the President with about 72 UPFA MPs supporting Rajapaksa. That is after 16 MPs including ministers, state ministers and deputy ministers left the government in the aftermath of the unsuccessful motion of no-confidence against Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. In the process, the government lost the two-thirds majority it enjoyed.

The SLFP has been at the centre of several politically significant events in recent months. In February, it came a distant third in the local government elections, arguably the party’s worst ever showing in terms of the percentage of votes it polled. That was after a campaign personally spearheaded by President Sirisena where he criticised the Rajapaksa camp as much as he castigated the UNP.

Thereafter, President Sirisena has hinted that he may contest the next presidential elections. That came in the form of an announcement at this year’s May Day rally in Batticaloa where he said that he had no intention of retiring from politics after 2020, the year presidential elections are due. However, the President didn’t specifically state that he would be running for office again.

Then, following in the footsteps of the UNP, President Sirisena has also announced that the SLFP would be ‘restructured’ extensively and all official positions of the party would be reviewed. The restructuring is due to be finalised by early next month. This comes in the wake of demands from the ‘group of sixteen’ who defected to the opposition to replace SLFP Generally Secretary Duminda Dissanayake and UPFA General Secretary Mahinda Amaraweera, both staunch loyalists of President Sirisena.

This is where President Sirisena finds himself in a difficult situation. Both Dissanayake and Amaraweera supported the President at the cost of incurring the wrath of the Rajapaksas. Dissanayake in particular was one of those who quit the Rajapaksa government in support of the President when he resigned as Minister of Health in 2014 to contest the Presidency. Therefore, even if there is a reconciliation between the warring factions of the SLFP, the President must ensure the political futures of the likes of Dissanayake and Amaraweera.

At a meeting of the SLFP’s highest decision-making body, the Central Committee last Thursday, President Sirisena is reported to have expressed his desire to see the remaining 23 SLFPers in the unity government leaving it “sooner rather than later”. This was conveyed to the media at a briefing by former Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara. Jayasekara’s comments have not been denied or disputed so far.

Sirisena and Rajapaksa factions

It appears that the SLFP now believes that remaining in government is political liability. That is because, with its currently depleted numbers in the Cabinet, it only has a few ministerial portfolios but will still be held accountable by the voting public for the actions of the UNP-led government. If anything, the outcome of the recent local government elections suggested that being in government had hurt the SLFP more than it had hurt the UNP.

The ‘group of sixteen’ is reported to have formulated a strategy for the future direction of the SLFP. Jayasekara claimed that this strategy, which included a plan for both the Sirisena and Rajapaksa factions of the SLFP to contest as one entity was accepted by the President.

However, how this reconciles with President Sirisena’s plan of ‘not retiring from politics in 2020’ and the Rajapaksas plan to promote a presidential candidate of their own- with Gotabhaya Rajapaksa the front runner at this stage- remains to be seen.

Indeed, it is accepted in SLFP circles that most of the ‘group of sixteen’ left the government with the intention of joining the Rajapaksa faction of the party or the new political party formed by them, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna. Some among this group, such as S. B. Dissanayake, who previously repeatedly proclaimed President Sirisena as the next presidential candidate, are not surprisingly silent on this issue now.

A compromise reconciliation between the two warring factions of the SLFP cannot be ruled out because, with the ‘group of sixteen’ leaving the government, there has been more dialogue and discussion between the two groups. In fact, the ‘group of sixteen’ was scheduled to meet Rajapaksa yesterday for formal talks.

Proposed party reforms

However, many details will need to be worked out. Chief among them would be the political futures of President Sirisena and Mahinda Rajapaksa. Rajapaksa is constitutionally debarred from contesting the Presidency but President Sirisena is not. If he insists on running for that high office again, it could stall any agreement between the two factions before it gets off the ground.

As such, any potential consensus is only possible in a compromise where one faction of the SLFP agrees to support the other faction, which will then run for President. That is why reconciling the two camps remain such a daunting task.

The coming month- when the proposed party reforms in the SLFP will come to the fore- will be crucial in determining the party’s future political direction. For better or for worse, it will also determine whether the next presidential election will be the traditional tussle between the UNP and the SLFP or whether it will, for the first time, be a three-way contest.

Steering with Maithri, Brakes & accelerator with Ranil – they pull in opposite directions

 by

Despite Maithri having the steering wheel, the brakes and the accelerator of the vehicle are with Ranil and the two of them try to drive in opposite directions just like when the buffalo and the cattle are tied to a plough says JVP Member for Uva Provincial Council Samantha Vidyaratna adding that the duo cannot go straight but pull on either direction. He said that is why the cabinet had to be amended four times.

Mr. Vidyaratna said this at a meeting held at the auditorium of Uva Provincial Council to apprise the public regarding the development proposal of the JVP for Badulla District from the allocations from JVP Members’ fund.

Speaking further Mr. Vidyaratna said, “People thank the President, the Prime Minister or Ministers for allocating funds for various projects. However, it is not necessary for none of the Ministers, nor the President nor the Prime Minister spend their money for the projects. It is the people’s money that is spent for all the projects carried out by the government and other bodies. Rs. 42 from every Rs.100 spent is levied as tax by the government and it is part of this money that comes for projects from the Treasury. Hence, it is the people who spend for all these projects.

Every year, a provincial Council Member gets Rs. 5 million and a Parliamentarian gets Rs. 15 million to carry out various projects in their areas. This money is from the people – the money collected as taxes. Hence, it is not necessary to thank politicians for spending people’s money. It is the people who should be thanked.
However, this incorrect way of thanking politicians for work done with people’s money has been occurring throughout history. Presidents, Prime Ministers, Ministers and other politicians have got their names on plaques of projects carried out with people’s money. The JVP would never mention any names for projects carried out with its allocations.
Today, we would allocate Rs. 5 million received as the Member’s allocation for various projects in the District. We don’t need any thanks for it. What is necessary is to use the money correctly and complete the work.

Very often, in our country, money allocated for various projects go missing. Certain big shots have been caught recently trying to get bribes. The Chief of Staff of President Sirisena and the former Chief of Staff of former President Chandrika Kumaratunga were caught attempting to take a huge bribe. The Chief of Staff of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the head of the Central Bank appointed by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe were caught for fraud. It seems that the biggest crooks in the country are with heads of political parties.

This country cannot be made an amicable one as long as the present decaying political system exists. This system must be changed.

Today, Ranil and Maithri cannot attend to the issues of the country. They have to work hard to protect their leaderships in their parties. They have got themselves caught in a leadership crisis.

To change this situation the political system that has been followed for 70 years must be changed. The country should go on a new path. We ask the people to give us power.”

Viyath Maga Convention – Intellectualism & Intellect 

P. Soma Palan
logoDaily Mirror of 16th May, carried the Report of the Annual Convention of the Viyath Maga by Lahiru Pothmulla, under the heading “ Sri Lanka should seize the opportunity “, in the context of the shift of Global economic  centre to Asia.
One may think the title “Intellectualism and Intellect ” paradoxical. Most truths appear paradoxical. I think an explanation is necessary, here. Intellectualism is accumulating and storing knowledge in the mind; Whereas, Intellect is a tool of the mind. It is used as a faculty to acquire knowledge. Intellectualism and Intellect are two different things. Yet they are connected to each other. Intellectualism is, not the Intellect; Nor, the Intellect, is intellectualism. Intellect is thinking discriminately. It is the mental capacity to discern the difference between seemingly similar things, but really dissimilar. In Hindu Vedantic philosophy it is called “Viveka”, in Sanskrit.
Coming to the Viyath Maga Convention, is a precursory Propaganda Seminar to boost the image of its Chairman, Gotabaya Rajapaksa (GR) and lend support for his prospective candidature for the forthcoming Presidential elections scheduled for 2019.
The theme of the Convention was “An Intellectually Inspired Sri Lanka”. Quite fittingly, GR had marshaled half a dozen Resource persons of Intellectual eminence, both expatriates and locals, to justify the said theme. The notable inclusion of a Tamil and a Muslim in the panel of speakers is deliberately intentional, to suggest that his prospective Presidency will be an inclusive one, recognizing the pluralism of the Sri Lankan polity, to woo the minorities.
The Sri Lankan expatriates, of course would have been delighted to be cajoled by the offer of free air ticket, food and lodging, to come on a holiday to the mother country. Further, gracing the Convention is an implied support for GR’s Presidential bid and to give credence to the slogan “An Intellectually inspired Sri Lanka”, would be the mark of his Presidential regime, if elected. Moreover, these speakers of the intellectual caliber can be rest assured, they will be in the “waiting list” for rewards in a prospective GR regime.
Moving away from my preliminary observations, I would critically examine the views expressed by the resource persons, confining to the Media Report only and not beyond. In doing so, I disclaim being an Intellectual, armed with a PhD prefix to my name. I am just a commoner with a commonsense perception.
Intellectually Inspired Sri Lanka
The above slogan suggest that the GR  regime would be one comprising, the educated, intellectuals, Professionals, managerial Experts ,and  Technocrats and, his policies and actions will be intellectually inspired. Is this blind optimism, pragmatic, considering the Sri Lankan reality? I say no, for following reasons:

Read More

Hype and haunt hovering over Gotabaya Rajapaksa


Former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa

logo Thursday, 24 May 2018


There is a connection between the hype that is being built these days around Gotabaya Rajapaksa, former Defence Secretary and once-powerful brother of the once-powerful President, and the haunt that shadows him wherever he goes.

The hype is loud and we can see and hear. The haunt, less visible to naked observation, is that of the ghost of Lasantha Wickrematunge, former Editor of The Sunday Leader, who was butchered and murdered in broad daylight. Keith Noyahr, former Deputy Editor of The Nation, is also haunting Gota; yet Lasantha’s macabre and creeping shadow overwhelms that of Keith.

The stanza in the Dhammapada seems to be crying out when Court proceedings are being heard about these sordid cases that happened under the watch of the former Defence Secretary under whom the Army, Navy and Police came. Says the Dhammapada: “Neither in the sky nor in the midst of the seanor by entering into the clefts of mountains is there a known place on earth where stationing himself, a man can escape from his evil deeds.”
(Paapavaggo)



Outrageous

Of course, nobody can at this stage judge Gota as guilty. We have to wait for the Court to make that judgment. Until that judgment, Gota is innocent. On the other hand, much of the prima facie evidence that has so far been recorded does not do Gota well at all.

His interview with the BBC on this issue is damning. There, Gota threatens: “I will hang him!” referring to former Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka. This evinces an arrogance; a dis-concern about the right to life and liberty of men and women; and a proclivity to abuse power at will.

All the economics and “vision” that Gotabaya Rajapaksa came out with at Shangri-La Hotel cannot outdo such outrageous conduct.

Sarath Fonseka (SF), even in a recent interview for the ‘Satana’ TV program kept repeating what he had been all along saying of Gota. SF openly claimed that Gota and his President brother were behind the assassination. SF even stated he would never address either of these two persons as “Mahatha,” but just by name as he holds no respect for them. He gave a detailed account of the harassment he had received at the hands of these two. Sarath Fonseka’s cool at the interview and his dispassionateness impresses. The former Commander is improving in stature by the day and the fact that he is now in Cabinet rank will help his further political growth.


Gota’s plunge

Gota is, to say the minimum, under a serious cloud. Disregarding possible future action against him, Gota has taken a gambling plunge into the President’s race due in year 2020. With such a sword of Damocles over him, he must be fighting a formidable battle inward in his mind. Had he taken the bold step of cooperating with the law and permitting a full investigation and then clearing his name, we could never fault Gota. On the other hand, he has decided to try and distract popular opinion and focus the latter on his self-claimed ability to be an effective president.

His Viyath Maga campaign is both a preparation for the presidential race and an attempt to build up a wave of public support for him which, if that backing swells, he can utilise it to block his arrest. This essentially is the linkage between the hype and the haunt. His brother Mahinda did something like that with his ‘Mahinda Sulanga’ meetings soon after his defeat. Mahinda created a public sympathy and communicated a fear to all officials of his possible return. Gota is hoping he can repeat a ‘Sulanga’ or even a ‘Kunatuwa’ (storm).

I am already receiving emails from Sinhala diaspora with threats to the country’s security if Gota is arrested and found guilty. A gentleman from California (I will call him PF, without revealing his name as a courtesy) sends me a copy of his latest email which reads thus:

“An incarcerated Gotabaya would generate an apocalyptic electoral outburst, the likes of which we had never seen before – the coup de grace that would wipe out Yahapalanaya – Gotabaya’s popularity is at its peak – an irrefutable fact. PC elections would swing against the Government!”

Now, PF is a former Lake House journalist.


The economics pundit

An amusing side of Gota’s revamping and redefining himself is his cognitive claims to a punditry in economics. At Viyath Maga, Gota is the economics messiah who appears to deliver the land to a state of First World prosperity. Gota’s intellectual credentials do not point to such knowledge. He had barely passed the O/Levels and has hardly shown any reading interests thus far.

Somebody like Dr. Nalaka Godahewa would have given him the script. If the notes were suddenly to fly away from Gota’s hold while at the lectern, he would probably mix up GDP with GST and equity with debt. It is no harm for a leader to read from a script, but it is necessary that he understands what he reads and I am not sure Gota understands economic policy. This is the very first time Gota has made a claim to that understanding.

The aforementioned Sinhala diaspora have cried out in emails and FB about the “great economic vision of Gotabaya Rajapaksa”. Gota maybe himself embarrassed. Look at the vision and you will find that they contain very commonly bandied about economic slogans that are clichés or platitudes today. I will mention a few:

1.That the global economic centre will shift to China, India and the South East. Our Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has been saying that for many years. One reason the Government is having Free Trade Agreements with countries in the region is part of this vision. Our GMOA had a one-day strike that deprived sick patients of urgent attention, due to the Singapore Agreement. They earlier struck work because of the proposed agreement with India. The GMOA understands no economics.

2.That economic development is the answer to all ills of the island.

3.The urgent need to restructure our economy. This has been stated over and over again by reputed economists and the World Bank. It is also a task that the Government has undertaken to do.

4.The need to build a knowledge economy in view of the digital revolution.

5.The need to encourage Foreign Direct Investment.

6.That economic zones must be set up around ports. This is already been done and the recent Hambantota Project is also that.

7.The need for ensuring that we get loans only if they are repayable by the project itself.

The above are pretty simple and oft-stated proposals. In fact Minister for Development Strategy Malik Samarawickrama has written to a Sinhala language newspaper pointing out how Gota’s “vision” is a total copy of the Government’s vision plan for year 2025.

This shows what a big and empty hocus pocus Gota’s Viyath Maga is. He announces this with impressive fanfare before an audience of businessmen invited to the Shangri-La Hotel. We are being told that Gota had sold the land where Shangri-La stands to China and that it is the same block where the Defence Ministry stood. The country’s Defence Ministry is now homeless. In this context, it interesting to investigate whether Gota was given the hotel for this event as a consideration by the Chinese owners. If it were so, then Gota is guilty of bribery.


(The writer can be reached via sjturaus@optusnet.com.au.)

SriLankan, Mihin Commission records evidence from 44


The Presidential Commission investigating alleged fraud, corruption and misuse of state assets in SriLankan Airlines, Sri Lankan Catering Services and Mihin Lanka has so far recorded evidence from 44 persons.
Among them were employees attached to these three institutions, Commission Secretary Ariyadasa Cooray said.
Evidence was recorded by the police investigation team led by ASP Lawrence on the advice of the team of legal counsel led by Additional Solicitor General Neil Unamboowe.
A decision would be taken regarding witnesses providing evidence after a proper legal study.
He said several other persons would be summoned to provide evidence in the near future.


Wed, May 23, 2018, 10:16 pm SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.


Lankapage LogoMay 23, Colombo At least 11 persons have died and 105,000 people have been affected due to the adverse weather conditions prevailing in Sri Lanka while 105,000 people were affected, according to the latest update from the Disaster Management Center.

Heavy rains accompanied by lightning and high winds battered 18 districts of Sri Lanka since Saturday and five people have died from lightning strikes alone. The other deaths were caused by incidents such as drowning in floodwaters, tree falls and earth-slips.

A heavy rainfall was received across several parts of Sri Lanka between 20 and 21 May 2018, caused heavy rains and flash floods mainly in twelve districts, including Southern, Western, North-Western, and Sabaragamuwa Provinces.

Meanwhile the Department of Meteorology predicts that the turbulent conditions in the Bay of Bengal will be strengthened to a low pressure system and thundershowers could be expected in many parts of the country in the next few days.

The Irrigation Department requested the people living near the Kalu Ganga to pay attention to the water level of the River with the continuing rains.

However, Department of Irrigation has said that water level of several major rivers which were at flood levels earlier are decreasing as of 6:30 pm local time today.

The water level of the Kelani River is currently decreasing, but the Nagalagam Street water gauge shows a high level. The water levels of the Mahaweli and Nil Wala Rivers, Ma Oya and Attanagalu Oya are receding, the Department said.

Meanwhile, the sluice gates of the Rajanganaya Reservoir have been opened this morning and the sluice gates of Deduru Oya, Polgolla and Udawalawe reservoirs remain open.

Due to the continuing rain, the National Building Research Organization (NBRO) has extended the landslide warning to another four districts. Kandy, Matale, Badulla, Kurunegala, Gampaha and Colombo districts have been issued a new landslide warning while warning issued for Ratnapura, Kegalle, Nuwara Eliya, Kalutara and Galle districts will remain active further.

Heavy rains have severely impacted Puttalam and Ratnapura districts and all small reservoirs in the districts have reached spill levels.

Some low lying areas in Gampaha and Colombo districts have also been submerged and the traffic on Kaduwela-Biyagama Bridge has been limited to one lane as the bridge is in danger of sinking.

The DMC said 557 military and police officials were mobilized immediately for search and rescue operations while 5,826 military and police personnel have been organized as stand-by teams for immediate deployment.

The Road Development Authority (RDA) has introduced hotline numbers 1969 for people to provide information on damages to the expressways and 1968 for other roads damaged by rain.

National Disaster Relief Services Centre has meanwhile provided Rs. 14.7 million cash allocations to the 12 District Secretaries to address the immediate needs of the affected populations.

The government's National Natural Disaster Insurance Policy will pay a compensation of up to one million rupees to the next of kin for each death and the government will grant Rs 10,000 for each flood damaged houses for cleaning the unit.


Minister of Disaster Management Duminda Dissanayake has visited Kalutara area and State Minister of Disaster Management, Palitha Range Bandara has visited Puttalam area together with Ministry and District officials to provide effective relief to affected people.

John Responds To Allegations: Jumps Into Fire To Save Lackey But Avoids Core Questions

image
logo
Tourism Development Minister John Amaratunga, in a seemingly loose statement, attempted to defend the conduct of his Senior Advisor Felix Rodrigo who is currently in hot water over a Chinese wedding fiasco.

John Amaratunga
“The article begins with the insinuation that the official concerned, Senior Advisor Mr. Felix Rodrigo is in ‘hot water’ as the Prime Minister’s Office has launched a ‘special investigation’ on the alleged attempt to pay Rs. 6 million to his brother’s company for organizing the Chinese mass wedding ceremony in Colombo last year which drew worldwide attention. The truth of the matter is that not a single cent was paid to any company and there is no ‘investigation’ either by the Prime Minister’s office or any other entity for that matter,” the 78 year old Minister said in a statement yesterday.
Colombo Telegraph observes that this is a weak attempt to avoid the core issue we have raised. In a series of articles, we exposed how Felix Rodrigo, Amaratunga’s Senior Advisor, was instrumental in sending a directive to former Sri Lanka Tourism Promotional Bureau (SLTPB) Chairman Udaya Nanayakkara to pay Rs. 6 million to the private company owned by Rodrigo’s brother Harindra Rodrigo for hosting a mass Chinese wedding in Colombo.
It was Nanayakkara who flatly refused to make the payment as the directive seemed suspicious. It was because Nanayakkara’s bold refusal that money was not paid to the Rodrigo company as directed by Amaratunga. Had Nanayakkara complied with the Amaratunga-Rodrigo directive, it would have allowed the duo to embezzle Rs. 6 million in public money in the guise of conducting a ‘Tourism promotions project’ warranting prosecution under the Public Property Act.
Nanayakkara was summarily dismissed from his position as he refused to make a suspicious payment to Rodrigo’s brother’s company. Surprisingly Amaratunga’s statement is completely silent on this directive to Nanayakkara which ultimately resulted in termination of the latter’s employment.
Amaratunga also says, “Disgruntled elements who occupied high posts at SLTPB and spent millions of dollars of ‘tourism money’ on foreign tamashas but yet could not obtain even one tenth of the exposure this event generated are most probably still fuming and behind these mudslinging attempts. The website seems to have forgotten the most fundamental principle in news reportage where they have failed to obtain the views of the accused parties before publication. Thereby the whole one-sided ‘story’ lacks any semblance of credibility and remains the work of a very fertile imagination.”
We are not entirely sure whom Amaratunga is referring to but we wish to state that it was the Investigations Desk of Colombo Telegraph that was behind the story, not any ‘disgruntled element’. We are in possession of a trove of documents which proves the unholy alliance between Amaratunga and Rodrigo and how they made blatant attempts to misuse public funds and properties.
When our reporter contacted the Ministry before the publication of the first story to get a comment from Rodrigo, a telephone operator strictly refused to share “personal contact details” of the Senior Advisor. However, we have always maintained that Rodrigo could respond to allegations with proof and concrete evidence, not with empty threats and meaningless rhetoric.
The Minister then says. “The private company concerned did an excellent job in conceptualizing, organizing, funding and executing the entire project on their own without any support whatsoever from SLTPB. So much so, that two more such events have now been planned for this year based on demand. This I believe is too much to stomach for the disgruntled individuals who prefer publishing fairytales on websites than actual work on the ground. As in the past the private company has not sought support of SLTPB for their upcoming events but has kept the Ministry of Tourism Development and the Ministry of Megapolis in the loop out of professional courtesy and expected from a company involved in the tourism business. ”

Read More

Palestinian teen shot by Israeli forces dies from injuries in Ramallah


Fifteen-year-old Uday Abu Khalil died after being shot in the stomach by Israeli forces last week

Uday Abu Khalil is the first Palestinian in the West Bank to die from Nakba day protests in the Occupied West Bank last week (Screengrab)

Wednesday 23 May 2018 
A Palestinian teenager shot by Israeli forces in last week's Nakba day protests in the Occupied West Bank died from his wounds on Wednesday, the Palestinian health ministry said. 
Uday Abu Khalil, 15, was shot at the entrance of Al-Bireh, north of Ramallah in the West Bank, the ministry said in a statement. 
The health ministry did not confirm when the teen sustained his injury, but the official Palestinian news agency WAFA said Khalil was shot in the stomach on 16 May. 
Major protests took place across the Palestinian territories that Wednesday as the United States transferred its Israeli embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.
Smaller protests took place on Thursday, the 70th anniversary of the Nakba, or catastrophe, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled their land during the 1948 Palestine war.
More than 60 Palestinians were killed along the Gaza border over two days, but the teen who died on Wednesday was the first killed in West Bank protests. More than 2,770 others were injured, including 225 children and 86 women.
The casualties raised the death toll since 30 March, the day when the six-week Gaza "Great March of Reurn" began, to 119, in addition to roughly 12,000 injuries.
The Israeli army insists its actions are necessary to defend the border and prevent mass infiltrations. 
It accuses Hamas of using the demonstrations to approach and damage the border fence, including laying explosive devices and attacking soldiers.
Palestinians see the eastern part of Jerusalem as their capital and the embassy move led the Palestinian leadership to cut ties with US President Donald Trump's administration.

Why artists are boycotting Berlin’s Pop-Kultur festival

Richard Dawson is among a group of artists who have pulled out of Pop-Kultur Festival 2018. (Paul Hudson)

Riri Hylton-23 May 2018
The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) has launched a campaign to boycott Berlin’s Pop-Kultur Festival in mid-August in protest at the Israeli embassy’s sponsorship of the international event.
“Israel seeks associations with international festivals, such as Pop-Kultur Berlin, to art-wash its image abroad in the explicit attempt to distract attention from its crimes against Palestinians,” PACBI explained in its press release.
“For a supposedly progressive festival to accept sponsorship from a decades-old regime of oppression and apartheid like Israel’s is unethical and hypocritical, to say the least.”
In response, festival organizers said they would not be “intimidated” and published a statement disclosing the extent of its cooperation with the Israeli embassy.
“We will collaborate with the Israeli embassy this year because our 2018 lineup includes three Israeli artists,” the organizers stated. “We will receive a total travel and accommodation contribution of €1,200 [approximately $1,400] from the embassy.”
The campaign was launched on 9 May and has already garnered support from Palestine solidarity groups in the German capital and abroad.
Jewish Antifa Berlin and Jewish Voice for Just Peace in the Middle East were quick to publish a joint message of solidarity, while legendary musician Brian Eno gave an interview to organizers, voicing his support for the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign in general.
Berlin Against Pinkwashing, a queer international group, released a statement in support of the campaign while UK artists ShoppingRichard Dawson and Gwenno Saunders have all withdrawn from the festival in solidarity with the Palestinian call.

“It’s not about the money”

Last year, BDS Berlin also called to boycott Pop-Kultur when the festival accepted a small donation from the Israeli embassy to go toward artists’ travel expenses in return for displaying the embassy’s logo on the festival website.
Some criticized the response as disproportionate to the approximately $590 the embassy had given but supporters of the boycott said the size of the donation was immaterial.
“It’s not about the money, it’s about the publicity they [the embassy] received,” Bahia Mahra, a local Palestinian activist, told The Electronic Intifada.
That campaign, called last-minute owing to the late announcement of the Israeli embassy’s involvement, was more spontaneous in character than this year’s effort. The call only came after Syrian rap artist Mohammad Abu Hajar and other Arab artists announced their intention to withdraw. Nine acts in total withdrew.
Festival organizers released a statement claiming BDS had “put intense pressure on all Arabic [sic] artists in our lineup,” a point repeated across local and national German media outlets, while failing to note that the four Arab artists who canceled did so before the campaign launched. News coverage followed a similar line, painting the campaign as an essentially “Arab” boycott.
The Pop-Kultur statement also characterized BDS as an attempt to “boycott completely any cooperation with Israeli artists and intellectuals or performances in Israel.”
Ronnie Barkan, a Jewish Israeli activist and BDS Berlin member, refutes the claim.
“We don’t boycott individuals, we boycott institutions. We will not boycott Israeli artists simply because they are from Israel, but we will boycott those who choose to act as cultural ambassadors for an apartheid state,” he told The Electronic Intifada.
“We will not normalize what is not normal or legitimize what is not legitimate.”

Watershed moment

Activists consider last year’s campaign a watershed moment in Germany.
“Until the boycott of Pop-Kultur festival in 2017, most people, including the media in Germany, didn’t even realize BDS was a global movement,” Doris Ghannam, a BDS Berlin member, told The Electronic Intifada.
“It’s had the result of opening up sorely needed spaces for debate about the nature of white supremacy and racism in Germany, as well as regarding reflexive support for Israeli apartheid.”
Historically, the environment has been hostile in Germany. Individuals and organizations expressing support for the Palestinian struggle have often been the target of verbal and physical violence.
Last year, Barkan and two other activists protested an event at Berlin’s Humboldt University where Aliza Lavie, a member of the Israeli parliament, was scheduled to speak. The demonstrators disrupted the session, highlighting Lavie’s role in the 2014 attacks on Gaza. During the protest an event organizer allegedly punched the female member of the group.
When protesting Israeli pinkwashing policies at the capital’s main pride event in 2016, Berlin Against Pinkwashing was met by a violent crowd, among them German politicians Oliver Höfinghoff and the center-left’s Andrew Walde, chanting “long live Israel.”
Berlin Against Pinkwashing held a similar demonstration the following year, where a lone counter-protester was seen attempting to pull down the group’s banner.
Artists and politicians have also been targeted. Spoken word artist Kate Tempest canceled a concert scheduled to take place at the former Berlin airport Tempelhof last October due to personal threats received via mail and social media.
The poet, who is of Jewish background, had signed an “Artists for Palestine” pledge in 2015 expressing support for the Palestinian struggle and a commitment to the cultural boycott of Israel.
One German newspaper published an article entitled “Can an anti-Israel activist appear in Berlin?” while another called on Berlin Mayor Michael Müller to cancel the concert.
In the weeks following the Pop-Kultur boycott campaign, it was reported that the Simon Wiesenthal Center was considering Müller as a candidate for its annual top ten anti-Semitic/anti-Israel incidents list.
Müller had, according to some, failed to publicly distance himself from the BDS campaign. In less than two weeks, the mayor gave an interview condemning the movement as anti-Semitic and stating that he was considering a “legally binding ban” of the campaign in public spaces.
“It’s a struggle to talk about Palestine in Berlin,” said Mahra. “As a victim of colonization and ethnic cleansing, you want to talk about the history, but every time you talk, it’s as if you are responsible.”
She added, “I have found that, in public, Germans want to prove to the world that they have learned from the mistakes of their forefathers and changed, but to do this they ignore the suffering and oppression of Palestinians.”

Palestine solidarity in Berlin

Despite the level of hostility, there exists in Berlin a core network of committed individuals.
“Our position on this isn’t wavering and isn’t backing down to the increasingly more pro-Israeli leanings of the German media,” said a member of Jewish Antifa Berlin, who asked not to be named. “We have our position and it is with the Palestinian people.”
The group contends that the quality and the diversity of acts on show at the Pop-Kultur Festival make it “the perfect stage” to advance a message of normalization. “As people who live in Berlin and as Jews, in whose name the Israeli state claims to act, we should not let that happen or let that go without a say.”
Ghannam spoke most clearly to the urgency of the situation: “During times like these, when Israel attacks and kills – without accountability – Palestinians who are peacefully demanding their rights under international law, it is essential to support Palestinians through boycotts, in Germany as well.”
“Responsibility for German history, of which many in this country talk, implies freedom, equality and justice for all, including Palestinians. The time for being deeply concerned is over. The time to act is now.”
Riri Hylton is a freelance journalist/editor working in both print and broadcast journalism. They are based between London and Berlin.

A Middle East Quadrumvirate: Good Bye Al-Aqsa!

Dr. Ameer Ali
logoDonald Trump’s relocation of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, amidst deaths, injuries and bloodshed not only fulfils the President’s election promise to US citizens but goes far beyond that in marking the beginning of the end of Arab Palestine and the Al-Aqsa along with it.  The President said earlier that the shift was to reflect reality on the ground. Very soon and one by one, other Western powers will do the same as that reality becomes irresistible.  In course of time, as Israel embarks on infrastructural development of Jerusalem and changes the city’s skyline, Saudi Arabia, after the European powers, will become the first Muslim nation to open its embassy in an undivided Jewish Jerusalem soon to be followed by Egypt. The so-called two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, much touted about by the West will slowly be forgotten and evaporate in thin air. Israeli settlements in occupied Gaza and the West Bank will expand in spite of aimless remonstrations in the Arab world. Let not the world fooled anymore. In the not too distant future, the Arabs in Palestine, thanks to Saudi rulers and Egyptian military men, will become cutters of wood and drawers of water in a greater and apartheid Israel. How did the Arab world in particular and Muslim world at large come to this?
Imperialist America in its relentless march to control the Middle East, its markets and resources needed a few compradors to accomplish its goal. Israel, planted at the heart of the Arab world, was a deliberate ploy to achieve this objective and was equipped with the most advanced weaponry including nuclear to defend itself against any possible opposition from its Arab neighbours. In every war since 1948, the Arabs were defeated comprehensively. Even the Yom Kippur or Ramadhan War of 1973 was a tactical victory for Israel. The Israeli lobby is so powerful in the West and international arena including the UN, the Arab world and the fifty-seven member Organization of Islamic Congress (OIC) is powerless and thoroughly incompetent to dislodge Israel’s position. It does not matter which administration governs US, democratic or republican, the commitment to protect Israel remains unchallenged. A guilty conscious Europe for what it did to the Jews has no choice in this matter but to go along with US dictates. 
Within the Arab world and since the discovery of oil in the Middle East the control of that resource and prevention of the former USSR and present Russia from entering the Mediterranean were the primary objectives of Western imperialists. In order to achieve that objective Britain and France, before handing over the imperialist baton to US, carved out the former Ottoman lands, installed puppets on the throne and protected them with money and weapons in return for their role as agents of imperialism. The few who refused, like Gamal Abdel Nasser in Egypt, Muammar Ghaddafi in Libya and Saddam Hussain in Iraq met their fatal end either naturally or through manufactured violence. 
From the point of view of US’s strategic and economic interests in the Middle East the support of two Arab nations is paramount. One is Egypt and the other is Saudi Arabia. The first, because of its large Muslim population and longstanding reputation as an incomparable centre for Islamic scholarship and learning centred at the world famous Al-Azhar University. Even Napoleon entered the world of Islam by first capturing Egypt and winning the support of at least some of its theologians. An eruption in Egypt, as witnessed in 2011, is bound to spread throughout Islamic Middle East. To keep Egypt under US control is imperative to pursue the geostrategic interests of the US Empire. This is why US pours billions of dollars into the coffers of Egyptian security forces whose only task is to keep Egyptians under control. El-Sisi’s military regime is a willing partner in facilitating US’s policy towards Israel and Palestine. Is it any surprise that el-Sisi prevented Turkey’s aircrafts to fly over its air space to rescue the Palestinians trapped in Gaza? 
The importance of Saudi Arabia to US’s Middle East policy, apart from the need for petroleum, arises from a different angle. Saudi Arabia possesses the keys to the two holiest of mosques in Mecca and Medina, which are the obligatory pilgrim centres for the entire world of Islam.  By holding the sovereignty over these centres and with plenty of money at its disposal the rulers of that country has a stranglehold over the religious life of world Muslims. Millions gather in Mecca every year and listen to the sermon from its pulpit. This sermon can become a powerful weapon in the hands of radical imams if they want Muslim masses to act in a certain way. As long as the Saudi regime remains in the hands of the current ultra-conservative family that danger can be avoided. No wonder then that US and Israel are always ready to aid the Saudi regime in case of any danger to its survival. In return, the regime is happy to open economic ties with Israel and willing to remain quiet on the issue of Palestine.  When Saudis want to wash their hands off Palestine why should the other Gulf potentates meddle with Palestine? The Saudi regime and Egypt are jointly accountable for much of the tragedies experienced by Palestinians.     

Read More