Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, March 15, 2018

State medics refuse treating Muslim assaulted by Sri Lanka elite police unit

BY KITHSIRI WIJESINGHE-13 MARCH 2018
Details are emerging of Sri Lanka security forces and public officials collaborating with ultra nationalist Sinhala Buddhist mobs in a riot against Muslims.
Doctors on duty in a government hospital denied treatment to injuries from a severe beating by members of the island's elite police combat unit, alleges a Muslim official from the central hills.

A S MOHAMED FAZIL
A Sinhala doctor at the Theldeniya hospital had turned down the request to treat bleeding head wounds received at the hands of the Special Task Force (STF), Abdul Saleel Mohamed Fazil told JDS by phone.
'Muslim terrorist'
The doctor had repeatedly referred to the wounded man as 'Thambi', a derogatory Sinhala term widely used against Muslims, while other medical officers looked on.
"The doctor accused me of being a 'Thambi' terrorist," said the 43 year local councillor who says that the STF tried to frame him and  two others for racial hatred when Muslims were under attack by Sinhala extremist mobs on 5 March.
"I was with my friend Faizal, when the STF broke into the house. The women and children started screaming as they were terrified. We were dragged down the steps by the STF members, thrust plastic bags filled with petrol on us and bound our hands and feet. They beat us with wooden poles, forcing to admit that we were plotting to attack Sinhala shops."
Nightmares
Mohamed Masood Faizal (40) and a student of Madawala Medina Central College were also mercilessly beaten up alongside Councillor Fazil by more than a dozen of STF personnel.
Mo

MASSOD MOHAMED FAIZAL
hamed Fazil received head injuries and the police had to take him to the hospital.
“The doctors accused me of a Muslim terrorist who is destroying the country and asked the police officer to go and dump me in a cell.”
Released on bail by court the next day and admitted to the Kandy district hospital, Fazil’s head wound had to be sutured.
They had not been given an opportunity by Theldeniya District Judge MH Fariqdeen to explain the circumstances surrounding their presence in court.
"Since the day of that incident, my kids wake up every night screaming" said Masood Faizal.
"They ask whether the armed troops would come and beat us again. Now I am scared for my family's safety" he added.
"Lost faith on security forces"
Five days after anti Muslim riots hit the central hills, Army Commander Mahesh Senanayake visiting the area announced that thousands of troops have been deployed in the Kandy district as the "police were unable to bring the situation under control".

MASOOD FAIZAL SUFFERED BRUISES AFTER BEING DRAGGED OUT OF HIS HOUSE AND BEATEN BY STF COMMANDOS


However, addressing a top level meeting in Kandy the minister of Muslim affairs detailed incidents where the military was also assisting rioters.

ABDUL LATIF
Muslims have lost faith on the security forces," said a visibly frustrated Minister Abdul Haleem, who hails from the area.
"They know who attacked them. But, they are afraid to complain. All this happened when the military, police and STF looked on."
He went on to describe an attack  where the STF chased away Muslims who gathered to safeguard a mosque and allowed a Sinhala mob to "finish their job within an hour".
Abdul Latif, an elderly Muslim from Endarutenna, Katugastota broke down in front of the meeting when he went on to describe how telephone calls to three military commanders for help was ignored.
"None of them even bothered to answer the phones. We have nothing left now. The mobs have destroyed everything" he said.
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe visiting the riot torn area thanked the security forces for "bringing the situation under control".
He placed the number of damaged places of worship, buildings and vehicles at 465.
In a public appeal for relief, officials of the Masjidul al Akbar Jumma mosque in Rajawella, Digana say that over 4000 families in many Muslim neighbourhoods have been affected by the violence.
© JDS

What do we see emerging after the riots in Sri Lanka?

Let me put it to you that there is a pattern, a thread running through all these violent episodes, all accusing the Muslims for inciting violence.

by Victor Cherubim-
( March 16, 2018, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) While Tourist Agencies were touting for tourists to visit Sri Lanka at the Tourist Fairs in Berlin, and in Japan, in March this year, there was another agenda taking place in the tourist resorts of Kandy. At Ambatenna a mob came by the hundreds, screaming at the top of their lungs, carrying sticks, stones and petrol bombs. Some two dozen policemen and soldiers watched helpless according to residents, as the mob, needless to say who they were – vandalised and set fire to Muslim homes and businesses in the town’s Welekada area.
To quote a report in the foreign media which said: “We were so scared,” Fatima Zameer told the reporter, “clutching her three week old infant,as she recounted the violence that swept, like a Tsunami, through her neighbourhood that morning”. I refer to the morning of 5 March 2018.She said:“We have nowhere to go. They broke all the windows in my house. Our whole house is burnt.”
The mob which witnesses said was between 200 and 500 overran Welekade defying the curfew and the State of Emergency imposed by President Maitripala Sirisena a day earlier to quell ant-Muslim riots which began in Teldeniya over the weekend of 4thMarch 2018.

Tracing the history of anti-Muslim sentiment 

First, many of you know, it was the hijab – the lifestyle issue of many Muslim women wearing the hijab. This dress was being looked at as alien to Sri Lankan culture.
Then, it was the Halal Certification – to create unnecessary fear in the minds of non-Muslims. The halal slaughtering methods or the ingredients that go into the food consumed. You know it was hardly a problem in the past, except in the case of some diehard objectionists.
You will note that in February 14, 2013 for the first time since May 1915, anti Muslim wave of violence erupted in the Kandy area. A gang known as the Keppitpola paara puyna distributed anti-halal handouts in villages that started it. The Sinhalese people were advised by the handout not to consume certain products until the Halal logo was removed from the packages.
Then it was the fact that the “tuk-tuk” three wheeler drivers were mostly Muslim and their charges were not monitored by meters.
If we fast forward the years, we had the Althugama- Beruwela anti-Muslim riots in 2014. These riots were based on hate speech and incitement by the BBS.
Recently we were told there was the Amparai clash, the “Vandha Pethi” issue. A Muslim restaurant was accused of mixing “Vanda Pethi” sterilization sub-fertility pills in the food served to people.
During all these incidents we were also made aware of the anxiety in rural Buddhist temples, many who accused Muslims of desecrating Buddhist structures outside places of worship and forcibly converting Buddhist devotees to Islam.
You must by now be tired hearing of my litany of accusations against the Muslims.
That was not all. Then there was the issue of the influx of Rohinga Muslim refugees from Myanmar to Sri Lanka. It was viewed as a conspiracy by the international human rights agencies to arouse the sentiments of fellow Buddhists?
The latest bout of communal violence began on Sunday March 4, 2018 when a truck driver, a Buddhist Sinhalese, died after being beaten up by a group of four inebriated Muslims in a three wheeler, over a traffic accident, days earlier, in the town of Teldeniya, in Kandy.

A Pattern to violence against the Muslims 

Let us for a moment look at the pattern of violence against the Muslims.
Let me put it to you that there is a pattern, a thread running through all these violent episodes, all accusing the Muslims for inciting violence.
You will agree with me that anger, aggression and violence are parts of the same spectrum. From a layman’s point of view anger is a feeling, is a normal emotion, aggression is a behaviour pattern, violence is the most extreme form of aggression. Violence has at its root, harm to another, as it is a planned result.
Successive governments in Sri Lanka by their incompetence, indolence and mismanagement, have been unable to control violence. Aggression in speech has turned to hate speech, which in turn has led to violence and violence has led to the civil war which we endured for 30 years.

Muslim bearance  

While all this was happening over the years, many if not most Muslim community leaders and observers in Sri Lanka, believed rightly, that most Buddhist Sinhalese by nature are tolerant and pluralistic and did not endorse anti-Muslim violence. Why was this underlying antipathy among the races ignored?
Muslims and in fact Tamils never accepted or understood the relationship between incompetence, or impotent governments in Sri Lanka and their ways of crisis management. Success in life whether it is for governments or for people is not handed on a plate. It has to be wanted, it has to be worked for, and it has to be earned.
We in Sri Lanka have always wanted a handout. Call it a legacy of colonialism, or by any other name, when inability of achievement, increased cost of living, pressure on governments, the easiest way out of it was confrontation. In this process strange as it seems, the easiest way successive governments resolve the issue was by violence. In certain circumstances, it was through collusion with the perpetrators of violence. We saw this in the 1983 Jaffna riots and we have seen it happen again and again.

Muslim reaction to violence 

Hafiz Ehsan Qadri, a leading Sunni Muslim cleric offers a historical perspective. He considers the violence against the Muslims to be an indirect result of the increasing “cultural disintegration” among the so called “Wahabi” hardliners in Sri Lanka. He believes that the early Muslim settlers were not opposed to the local people or their cultural ethos. Even when the Sufi saints came to Sri Lanka and built 360 mosques, they had no problem with other communities. There was no disharmony at all. What really has changed?
Let me introduce you to what Minister Rauf Hakeem has said. He is of opinion that it is all caused by the Islamophobia in the world around, which is impacting on Sri Lanka. I leave it to your judgment.
Many other observers say that the Unity Government of Sri Lanka depends on the support of a very large section of the Muslim community who voted for it and put it into power. It is a fact that Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe and the Muslims have a lot in common in business ideology; some even say that the UNP and the Muslims are in each other’s pockets.

Sinhalese counter action

The majority Sinhalese, not only Buddhists but others of other faiths also strongly condemn this overpowering position the Muslims hold on the present government and are opposed to it.
The recent Local Government election campaign of the Joint Opposition had roused the sentiment of the Buddhists Sinhalese, at least to break this link between the UNP and the Muslims.
The Buddhist Sinhalese masses many feel, that the Tamils of the North and East have been sufficiently punished beyond recognition in the 28 year war. It is now the turn of the Muslims, who are as much as 10 % of the total population and growing at an alarming rate? The feeling among many, if not most is that Muslims too need to undergo the same treatment to keep them under control?
What is angering the Muslims as well as many ordinary Sri Lankan citizens is that as long as there is a weak and indolent government, the people who will suffer the most are the Muslim population in the future?

What are the avenues open to the Muslims of Sri Lanka? 

If we are to assess the damage done by the recent Kandy riots not only to the Muslims but also to the country and also to all communities as a whole, we can enumerate as follows:
First and foremost, it is not the Muslims who have suffered, but the restoration of reconciliation and the freedoms which were salvaged after the long war years, is now in the balance.
A generation of people, Buddhist, Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims and Christians who grew up knowing only conflict as a mode of life, had reason to hope for the future. Many reforms had been initiated to restore the freedoms curtailed during the Civil War. Some reforms have been notable because people have a greater sense of freedom, respecting free speech and freedom of movement. The abuse of this freedom due to hate speech being tolerated and which was not controlled by the Yahapalanaya Government has made not only the Muslims in a weaker position, but the country in dire straits.
Hate speech, what it intends to dispose is freedom of expression. Instruments of control by Governments can be used and abused.
As and until these freedoms are restored with hate speech made a criminal offence severely punishable in law, the damage done will impact on the Muslims more than any other minorities.
Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) is known to have been active in unleashing hate crimes against religious minorities of the country. It is also well known for its anti-Muslim rhetoric since its formation in 2012, as it has held various campaigns against the Muslims seeking to enforce the Buddhist predominance. Ven Galagoda Aththe Gnansara Thera has advocated one nation, one religion, one language and has exhorted Sri Lanka to be run like a Buddhist nation. He has to be warned, to find another outlet for his rhetoric.
The Most Ven. Thibbatuwave Sri Siddhanta Sumananagala Thera, the Malwattu Mahanayake, has categorically stated some days ago that there is no need for any “Sena’s” among the Buddhists to save the nation. The Sri Lanka Army is the proper “Sena” for the defence of Buddhism and the country. Muslims must make common cause with the various religions to establish this thinking.
You will note that the first thing that the IMF imposed on Sri Lanka after the recent Kandy riots, was to curtail and not sanction the tranche of funds approved but not released to Sri Lanka in March 2018, putting the Government under more pressure.
You will also note that the Government decision to declare a countrywide State of Emergency following the carnage in Kandy last week, has caused fear in the tourism industry. It was too little too late and a knee jerk reaction, when much could have been done well in time. The Chinese and the Indian tourist markets are relatively new to Sri Lanka unlike the traditional European market such as Germany, France and UK. Kandy hotels took a severe beating during the carnage as there were a large number of cancellations.
The most important single act that Muslims inside the Government could do beside seek redress for the damage to mosques and places of religious worship to be restored to their original stature in Kandy and elsewhere, is to give a strong message to the Unity Government that they will abandon the coalition, if action is not taken without delay.
The STF and Police has identified and raided an office run by the main suspect arrested in connection with the recent racial violence and for spreading racially explicit propaganda through the social media. Widanapatiranage Amith Jeevan Weerasinghe  near Kundasale was found in possession of material used to spread hatred, discord and violence. They included leaflets, posters, notices, banners and thousands of letters for distribution containing extremely racial content.
Based on statements given by the main suspect Police have discovered seven bottles filled with petrol intended to be used for petrol bombs.
The new Law and Order Minister. Maddume Bandara, should be lobbied by Muslim organisations around the country to take immediate preventive measures and to proscribe hate speech by legislation in Parliament without delay.

Muslims need to join with other minorities to protect themselves 

The myths pertaining to Muslims have to be clarified and cleared. Diversity management helps the Muslim community understand the benefits of diversity for themselves as well as for others. Muslims need not change their beliefs or religion.
Violence breeds violence. Repay violence with reconciliation not only with Buddhists but with all communities. If anyone says this is a stance of weakness, ignore it.
Be prepared unilaterally to go out of your way to do the best for others and you will be surprised how this will play in the future.
If someone says “grow up and live life in the modern world,” do not think they are arrogant. Accept it as a compliment.

The reality of living in Sri Lanka today 

We see a clear pattern of discontent emerging in the Muslim community after the riots over many years. Many Muslims now feel being betrayed, being let down not only by the majority community. Unity is strength, but it should not be taken for granted. The posture of many Muslims posing as Sinhalese has not and will not work in the future. The commonality of purpose of all Muslims as being part of Sri Lanka, is one that has to be explored in greater detail island wide.
As long as Muslims of Sri Lanka continue to remain as an “endangered species” they can expect to be tossed around “like a sack of potatoes”.
In 1915 the Muslim riots were mistaken as a “fight for national freedom against colonialism.”
The Aluthgama riots of 2014 were seen as a “fight for economic freedom.”
I do hope the current Kandy riot of March 2018 will awaken the need among Muslims of all persuasions, “to take up a stand and fight for what is right to reconcile the diversity.

Beyond the Match: In the name of humanity


The two days that followed the government’s announcement that things had returned to normal in Kandy were tempestuous; rains, full of sound and thunder, almost like a catharsis to the horror that had preceded them.

2018-03-16
“May the rains wash away the racism,” was how one commentator put it on Twitter. It would be unbecoming of me not to suggest that this is what we, the majority, want. The lives lost of the two peoples -- one the Sinhalese and the other Muslims, can never be brought back, but mercifully those deaths did not trigger a pogrom. Instead we saw members of the clergy, from both sides of the divide, work with each other even in areas where pogroms could easily have occurred. Hence last Friday, the day of prayer and reflection for Muslims, passed on peacefully. If only the reactions of the elite and the born-again liberals were as worthy of praise as that.   

In “Big Match 1983”, Yasmin Gooneratne ends with these prophetic lines:   

Near the wheels of his smashed bicycle
,   
at the corner of Duplication Road a child lies dead,   

and two policemen look the other way,   

as a stout man, sweating with fear, falls to his knees,   

beneath a Bo-tree in a shower of sticks and stones,   

flung by his neighbour’s hands
.   
The joys of childhood, friendships of our youth, 
 
ravaged by pieties and politics, 
 
screaming across our screens her agony,   

at last exposed, Sri Lanka burns alive.   
We need to think beyond this simplistic model which assumes that the panacea to all evil in the world is membership of a particular clique, belonging more often than not to a privileged circle 

What is worse than the excesses of the chauvinist, like the administrators of the Mahason Balakaya, is the indifference of those who speak loftily about those sunshine days which they spent with friends from other ethnicities. The joys of childhood, juxtaposed with the showers of sticks and stones we hurl, for me brings up a point of contrast between the milieu to which those two groups belong to the stunted peasantry on the one hand and the obese privileged on the other. I am aware that I am generalising a little here, but my act of generalising is based on a desire to point out that while the fires burn, while racism swings both ways and takes this country closer to its imminent death, the privileged, regardless of ethnic and religious affiliations, continue to remember their sunshine days and reflect on a reality that was true only for their milieu.   

If we are to progress, if we are to get rid of racism, if not completely then at least effectively, we need to think beyond the friends we made when we were at school, the harmonious relationships we kept alive in our childhood and the various shops and eateries we frequented which were owned by those who belonged to other races and religions. We need to think beyond the institutions of privilege – at school or elsewhere – which guaranteed an absence of racial disparities and chauvinism. No consensus has ever been reached with respect to the assumption, sustained by quite a number of people here, that membership of esoteric institutions in the longer term does away with racism. Chauvinists and racists tend to house those privileged quarters too, and far from embracing other collectives through the culture of coexistence rooted in these institutions, they tend to turn into renegades and vent out their chauvinist streak in terrible ways.   

We need to think beyond this simplistic model which assumes that the panacea to all evil in the world is membership of a particular clique, belonging more often than not to a privileged circle that defines itself by differentiating itself from the rest of the country. The ordinary Sinhalese, Tamil, Muslim, and Burgher man or woman on the street, who is not a member of and has never been near such institutions of privilege, cannot and will not take notice of those who hail from them when they set about giving vent to their racist rants and raves. Those who suffered from both ends in Kandy, in that sense, neither affirm nor care about the assumptions we make with respect to the link between those institutions and the (supposed) absence of chauvinism which distinguishes them. Racism is real and alive most potently in less privileged, if not unprivileged, cultural spaces, which those who speak in high-heeled (!) terms about the friendships they inculcated at their schools probably aren’t aware of. Again, I am generalising here for a reason.   
Instead we saw members of the clergy, from both sides of the divide, work with each other even in areas where pogroms could easily have occurred and last Friday’s prayers passed on peacefully

Simply put, we cannot get out of this conundrum, this clash of civilisations within a larger, homogenous civilisation, if we inculcate in our schoolchildren an attitude of indifference towards such a clash with the excuse, “Hey, we learned not to fight with each other over our ethnic and religious backgrounds when we were at school, so why don’t you all just shut up, shove it in, and let us guide you?” 

Such an attitude reeks of ignorance at best and elitism at worst, and it explains why, as a friend of mine put it through a Facebook post the other day, our post-1948 political experience has been marred so much; because in that post-independence era, the country ended up swerving between two pillars of power (the UNP and the SLFP) which were housed by the same privileged, elitist meritocrats who believed (what else?) that membership of privileged quarters was the magic potion that could do away with all evil. It’s that attitude which, while clearly dying (and thankfully), has delegitimized any genuine attempt at brokering peace in the eyes of the ordinary Sinhalese, Tamil and Muslim.   

My friend (and a great friend at that, by the way) Hafeel Farisz, interviewing C.V. Wigneswaran more than a year ago, posed a rather interesting question: “Isn’t it a fact that from the time of Navalar or Dharmapala or Bandaranaike to Chelvanayagam, and now to you, it was [always] the elite who fought their political battles at the expense and the blood of the common man?”   
I like Hafeel’s brash honesty and I have come to appreciate the points he raises and the questions he asks, even if they are derided and vilified by half the country. In this case especially, I appreciate and agree with his question, because it’s a question that provides its own answer. Because yes, it was the elite, and yes, the same elite that Yasmin wrote about in her poem, as the schoolboys danced away, watched the match in progress, yelled to their heart’s content, and celebrated the diversity they had institutionalised in their closed, privileged quarters, while the rest of the country, comprising not of them and me, but of the ordinary Sinhalese, Tamil and Muslim farmers and civil servant, burnt.   
Racism is real and alive most potently in less privileged, if not unprivileged, cultural spaces
So what have we learned? That the friend I alluded to, with his Facebook post, provided the best answer; that on a superficial level, we have something to blame for everything that is wrong with this country; the exemplary leadership that these elites, hailing from their closeted quarters, unleashed on 
this country. 

From Bandaranaike onwards, that leadership didn’t lead us to the Promised Land. It led us instead to Vaddukoddai, 1983, Aluthgama, and now Digana.   

Two Identities & Two Responsibilities  

By Rishard Najimudeen –

Rishard Najimudeen
logoEvery human being has more than one identity which depends or changes in accordance with particular context and situations. For instance, our “Nationality” (Or Passport) would be prioritized in Airport rather than our religious identity. In contrast, while we are in our deathbed no one will refer to our passport. Rather, we would be estimated with our “Faith and Practices” (Religious identity). This basic understanding of our identities, which are frequently changed, is one of the key element to resolve our problems prevailing particularly in a pluralistic society. I write this article based on my two essential identities.
As a Sri Lankan citizen which is one of my primary identities I have some major responsibilities towards the nation. Sri Lanka gained its freedom from British colonization in 1948. It’s worth to note that all Sri Lankan citizens regardless of ethnicity, religion and races had participated in freedom struggle. Unfortunately, the leaderships that took over the responsibility of the nation, failed to develop the concept of pluralism and also to unite the indigenous people under the one identity as Sri Lankan. Rather, they concentrated on their personal political interests and benefits. It is obvious that Sinhala only act, which was passed in the parliament in 1956, had resulted a negative impact on ethnic harmony among the local communities. Particularly, Tamil speaking community were marginalized and their aspirations were ignored by the political leaders for achieving their political victory in elections. As the result, those victimized Tamil community were inevitably compelled to demand for them a separate land and later, it evolved as a prolonged battle between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil armed groups. The LTTE, which was then recognized as a terrorist group internationally, was always being one of the main obstacles for nation building process.
However, then President Mahinda Rajapaksa was able to defeat the terrorist group along with courageous military force in 2009. I believe this victory should be marked as the second independence of our country. He had gotten a golden opportunity to reunite the people under the one identity and move forward in order to make Sri Lanka as one of the glorious countries in Asia. But, he failed to do so and even to create a conducive environment. Number of ethnic conflicts were staged during his tenure. Specially, Muslim community was targeted and their worship places, shops and houses were attacked very often. Even during the year 2013, more than 250 malicious incidents against Muslims were recorder. All the violations against a minority community were staged by few extremist religious groups without any interference of the government or without taking any serious actions on the violatorsConsequently, majority of Muslims had to support the common candidate in presidential election in 2015 as response to the inaction against the culprits and rising tendency to violate the rule of law in matters related to Muslim minorities and therefore, by the support of the minority communities, Maithiripala Sirisena was able to win the election.
Good governance, which was the focal point of the President Mathripala Sirisena during election campaign, gained yet another favourable occasion to make Sri Lanka a united nation. But, unexpected trend has emerged once again and illegal attacks still continue against Muslim community. Recently staged brutal attacks that occurred in several places in Kandy District, have created a huge gap and mutual suspicion between two communities. In fact, Muslim community in Kandy area used to maintain a cordial relationship with majority Sinhalese. But, it is unfortunate to see how situation has become vise-versa. As a Sri Lankan citizen I strongly argue that these attacks will affect very badly on the mentality of both communities. My concern is how we can build a common ground where all Sri Lankan citizens come to gather in order to make our country glorious politically, economically and socially. Every citizen, whether he is a Buddhist, or a Hindu or a Muslim or a Cristian, should have the same responsibility to spread the sense of peace and harmony among the communities.
Apart from depending on political parties, initiating active “civil organizations” which consist of personalities, academicians and activists irrespective of their religion and ethnicity would be the initial stage to make a greater awareness among the societies. On the other hand, the societies should be educated gradually in order to make it as a “pressure group” exerting influence on political parties. It would be impossible to build the nation without having a friendly relationship with each and every societies. As a citizen of this nation, I firmly believe in that initiating and strengthening such civil organizations are one of the needs of the day and every individuals should think of this kind of initiative seriously.

IGP dodges when questioned on the Police and his inefficiency and ineptitude - flees like a criminal ! (Video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 15.March.2018, 3.20PM)  When the IGP was questioned on the  accusations mounted against the police  and the IGP over the gross  inefficiency and ineptitude of the police in connection with the communal violence in Kandy , the IGP fled the scene. Vide video footage below. The police absolutely failed to control  the situation which led to unnecessary disaster and deaths .
When the IGP attended a function in Pamunugama on the 13 th organized by the Police and the  Disaster management unit for the distribution of crafts , engines and canoes  to police stations which face the risk of floods , the IGP dodged the questions and ran away like a most wanted criminal .
Whither Sri Lanka and law enforcement with an IGP who flees  like a most wanted bandit ?
Vide Video 
---------------------------
by     (2018-03-15 09:53:13)

Caesar’s seizure and a common candidate


 Friday, 16 March 2018 

logoToday (as I write, on 15 March) is a red-letter day for democratic-republicanism. It commemorates the occasion on which a klatch of lean and angry men stabbed Julius Caesar in the back… and front, or all over.

Perhaps Caesar – the first of his name, and never Emperor of Rome (that dubious honour being reserved for his great-nephew Octavius who was deified as Augustus) – had it coming. A brilliant general, no mean orator, the holder of all the traditional magistracies leading to imperator, this noble but ambitious Roman politician – articulate and epileptic – aspired, outrageously to then prevailing sensibilities, to clutch and keep the purple.

Some 21 centuries later (2,062 years since the calendar date of the assassination, to be exact), human nature hasn’t changed much. If Shakespeare hadn’t immortalised the consul who would be king, we would still have recognised his ilk in successive incarnations of political ambition through the ages and along the corridors of time and power.


The historians Tacitus, Suetonius and Plutarch leave us with relatively dispassionate accounts of Caesar’s attempted power grab. I suspect republican sentiments would be equally violent in their passionate disapproval of such a Caesarean seizure (eikonic if not epileptic) even if the annals of Roman republicanism didn’t bias us towards less ambitious democratic leaders.

Let us admit that ambition must be made of sterner stuff. We are more likely to follow the conquering general to the gates of hell or a charismatic bully to a promised better future than a stuffy bureaucrat who’s minded the store for his stellar peers and inherited the business due to a technicality.

Even a Machiavellian Marc Antony who makes mincemeat of the Brutuses and Cassiuses in the caucus with his celebrated bon mots as much as his puerile jibes at the plebes is perhaps more acceptable to the hoi polloi than envious Casca who skulked in his incandescent master’s shadow for many years before daring to dream the great antidemocratic ambition.

Common

It is a mistake of political messiahs – whether powerful magistrates in classical sprawling empires or petty mandarins in a contemporary small island republic – to mistake their present popularity for perpetuity.

MR made that cardinal error once (“the fault is not in the stars”) – and we’re all still paying the price of his premature exit that led to the emergence of a common candidate to right the wrongs of a repressive regime. MS seems to be on the cusp of making the same mistake again, with the singular exception that he is nowhere near as popular as our erstwhile charismatic bully cum conquering hero was. It would behove him who reaches for the nettle prematurely to remind himself to expect thistles to permanently scar his grasping hand.

If one is in doubt about a man’s ambitions, his actions speak more meaningfully and significantly of his inner motivations than some political manifesto can or will. There is a litany of recent false steps from blocking social media to seeking a re-institutionalisation of the odious emergency framework to provoke responses from head-scratching to hand-wringing to voting with one’s feet in protest.

Shall I invoke the reprehensible patriarchy of legislation which lowers women to the status of second-class citizens or the repugnant paternalism that entertains ethno-nationalist chauvinists at the head table of presidential parity?

Pity that his strongly professed aversion to corruption is now seen to have been mere electioneering propaganda against the political threat of his numerically superior coalition partners and a transparent attempt to leverage the alleged culpability of the UNP on white-collar crime for personal advantage. I come not to praise this would-be Caesar, but to bury him and his ilk and like before history repeats its blasé self...

Candidate

I am not suggesting that political Caesars are ripe for public assassinations, whether on the way to the Forum two thousand years ago or on Facebook again from today onwards again. Not by any means can even the staunchest republican be vouchsafed safe conduct in realms physical or virtual should he suggest such infamy. So I shall hold my peace for the nonce in the absence of evidence that the incumbent head of state plans to subvert the political reforms process of which he is increasingly looking like a reluctant has-been architect.

The message has been lucid for millennia since Rome abdicated its republic in favour of empire or an island requiring a parliamentary system of governance with a small prime ministerial cabinet enthroned a series of petty functionaries as their all-powerful chief executives.

One could so quote Lord Acton’s famous dictum, but that would just be to invoke an embarrassment of riches. The tendency of power to corrupt – and that of absolute power to corrupt absolutely – is self-evident to all but the Caesars who seizures (real, virtual, attempted, aspired to or imaginary) prompt epileptic fits in distressed democratic-republicans.

There is no greater heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it – quite the opposite, in fact: if we believe present trends, inclinations, declarations. Great men are almost always bad men; and not in a good way, like Julius Caesar, if you know what I mean.

Trust that at least now (in the restless spirit of Cato the Censor who repeatedly reminded the Roman Senate that Carthage, that symbol of excessive power, must be destroyed) the slow-to-learn body politic as much as the less stellar powers that be will realise the pragmatic wisdom of abolishing, not pruning, the executive presidency of a democratic republic.

Until we actualise that great assassination – of a constitutional monster, not a mediocre character – the shades of the Ides of March will haunt us every step on the way to the Forum as every misstep with the Facebook memes that are rearing their heads again as we speak.
(Journalist | Editor-at-large of LMD | Writer #SpeakingTruthToPower)

Arrest warrant issued on Gnanasara Thera

2018-03-15
The Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday issued an arrest warrant against Ven.Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera for failing to appear in Courts over an ongoing case against him.
The Police Organized Crimes Prevention Division (POCPRD) filed a case against the Thera for allegedly making hateful remarks and insulted other religions during a meeting held at “Jalagalum Nimna” National Park in Polonnaruwa.
Accordingly, Colombo Chief Magistrate Lal Ranasinghe Bandara had set the case to be examined on May 10.
The POCPRD arrested the Thera over the case on June 21, 2017, and released him on the same day on a Rs.10, 000 cash bail and two sureties of Rs.500, 000 each.
Earlier, the Colombo Chief Magistrate warned the Thera not to engage in such incidents again and that the Court would have to revoke the bail and remand him. (Yoshitha Perera)

Mueller subpoenas Trump Organization for documents related to Russia – report

Reported order is first time special counsel has asked for documents directly related to Trump’s businesses in course of investigation

 The Trump International Hotel in Washington DC. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP

and 
The special counsel, Robert Mueller, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, the New York Times reported on Thursday, in a sign that the investigation is inching closer to the president.

The subpoena was delivered in “recent weeks” and includes an order for the Trump Organization to turn over all documents related to Russia and other topics he is investigating, the Times reported, citing two people briefed on the matter.

It is the first known order directly related to Trump’s sprawling business empire.

Asked by the New York Times last year whether he would consider Mueller examining his and his family’s finances a “red line”, Trump said: “I would say yeah. I would say yes. By the way, I would say, I don’t – I don’t – I mean, it’s possible there’s a condo or something, so, you know, I sell a lot of condo units, and somebody from Russia buys a condo, who knows?”

He added: “I don’t make money from Russia. Other than I held the Miss Universe pageant there eight, nine years.”

On Twitter, Trump has said he has had “nothing to do with Russia – no deals, no loans, no nothing”.

But on Wednesday Democratic lawmakers investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin alleged that the future president’s private company was “actively negotiating” a business deal in Moscow with a sanctioned Russian bank during the 2016 election campaign.

The statement by Democrats on the House intelligence committee, who have had access to internal Trump Organization documents and interviewed key witnesses, raises new questions about the Trump Organization’s financial ties to Russia and its possible willingness to deal with a bank that had been placed under US sanctions.

The Democrats did not indicate the source of their information.

One month before Trump laid down this “red line”, Don McGahn, the White House counsel,
reportedly threatened to quit after Trump asked him to have Mueller fired because the president believed he had a number of conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation.

Meanwhile a new poll from Pew Research Center found 61% of Americans were very or somewhat confident Mueller will conduct a fair investigation.

Opinions divided along party lines. Some 46% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents agreed, while for Democrats the figure was 75%.

The study, carried out before Thursday’s announcement of sanctions on Russian intelligence for its interference in the 2016 elections, also found 55% of Americans either not at all or not too confident that the Trump administration will take serious action to prevent Russia from influencing future elections in this country.

Mueller was appointed in May 2017 to investigate whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to sway the 2016 presidential election.

He is also reportedly investigating whether Trump obstructed justice by firing former FBI director James Comey, who has said he refused to give the president his loyalty.

The White House referred all inquiries to the Trump Organization. A lawyer for the Trump Organization did not wish to comment on the record.

At her regular media briefing, press secretary Sarah Sanders declined to address reports of the subpoena directly.

“As we’ve maintained all along and as the president has said numerous times, there was no collusion between the campaign and Russia,” Sanders told reporters. “We’re going to continue to fully cooperate out of respect for the special counsel. We’re not going to comment: for any specific questions about the Trump Organization, I’d refer you there.”

Additional reporting by David Smith
Why Trump’s admission that he made stuff up to Justin Trudeau is particularly bad

President Trump boasted to donors that he told Canada's prime minister that the U.S. has a trade deficit with Canada, despite having "no idea" if that was true. 


In a fundraising speech Wednesday, President Trump admitted once and for all that he just makes stuff up. The man who has racked up more than 2,000 false and misleading claims as president said he insisted to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that United States runs a trade deficit with Canada — despite having “no idea” whether that was the case. (Surprise! It's not.)

“I said, ‘Wrong, Justin, you do.’ I didn’t even know,” Trump said. “I had no idea. I just said, ‘You’re wrong.’ You know why? Because we’re so stupid.”

None of this is hugely surprising. Trump utters way too many falsehoods for it to be a coincidence. And we've seen over and over again — particularly most recently in meetings with lawmakers about guns and immigration — that Trump simply doesn't do his homework beforehand. He generally doesn't seem to have even a cursory understanding of what Congress is up to or about the underlying policies.

But the fact that Trump would make up this particular fact is especially remarkable and ominous.
The first reason is that this is perhaps the one issue Trump has focused on for decades: trade. It would be more understandable for him to make things up on guns and immigration, but trade is supposedly the issue on which Trump has been entirely consistent for many years. The idea that other countries are taking advantage of the United States was a talking point long before he became a politician.


This isn't the first time President Trump has been caught making a false claim in an important meeting. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)

Trump for years has talked about how the North American Free Trade Agreement is such a bad deal.

And he threatened Canada with new steel and aluminum tariffs, before he decided to exempt them, for now, as long as the NAFTA negotiations go his way.  Yet he didn't even know that the United States runs a trade surplus with Canada!? If he doesn't have that basic a level of background knowledge on an issue he apparently cares deeply about, what does he study?

The second reason is that it was a rather pointless invention. Trudeau knows the truth: He has been involved in policymaking for years and knows these things, because it's very important to his job as a world leader. Why Trump would feel the need to make something up that is of such consequence to Trudeau doesn't even make sense for strategic reasons. It's not as if Trump was going to pull one over on the prime minister and have the Canadians suddenly cave on NAFTA negotiations.

The final part of this is what it says about Trump's brand of diplomacy. This isn't the first time we've got a glimpse behind the curtain. Early in his presidency, The Washington Post obtained transcripts of his calls with the leaders of Australia and Mexico. Trump's call with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull turned contentious after Trump became enraged by an agreement the Obama administration made with Australia to take some refugees. Trump didn't seem to have any understanding of the agreement of Australia's policy of not accepting refugees who arrive by boat.

Calls to Mexican and Australian counterparts give insight into Trump's diplomatic style 
What happens if Trump takes this approach — or the one from the meetings on guns and immigration — to his meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un? Can a guy who can't be bothered to understand the basics before talking to foreign leaders and lawmakers do the kind of homework required for very sensitive and complicated negotiations involving nuclear programs? And what if he doesn't even try? What if he decides to wing it, as he did with Trudeau?

Thus far, Trump has shown no signs that he thinks that style isn't working. And apparently, it's still very much a part of his international diplomacy.