Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, January 8, 2018

Introducing #snapshotlka – Our Hashtag on Instagram


GROUNDVIEWS-
GroundviewsVikalpa and Maatram invite their followers on Instagram to follow #snapshotlka, as the platform recently announced the launch of a new feature allowing users to follow hashtags, in the same way as following an Instagram account.
Users who choose to follow a hashtag will see top posts appearing in their main feed. This allows users to follow specific areas of interest – for instance, through following hashtags such as #photojournalism. Rolled out on December 12, the feature was described as a ‘game changer’ by Forbes.
Followers of #snapshotlka will have easy, real-time access to photos collectively posted by Groundviews, Vikalpa and Maatram in one single page. Additionally, it allows those who do not have the Instagram app on their smartphones to view photography from all our sites, in one location, over any browser. To our knowledge, this is the first time a media organisation is using this feature in Sri Lanka.
To follow a hashtag, search for it via the magnifying glass icon at the bottom of the screen, or tap on a hashtag on any post, allowing a page of images related to the hashtag to load. There should be an option to follow the hashtag at the top of your screen. Previously, those who wanted to view content under a particular hashtag would have to search for it each time – a relatively time-consuming process.
GroundviewsVikalpa in Sinhala and Maatram in Tamil are institutionally anchored to the Centre for Policy Alternatives. Since inception, each site’s technical innovation around storytelling, including over mobiles, is without parallel in the country. Each site engages actively with users over a variety of social media, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.
Groundviews now has over 35,000 followers on Facebook and over 90,000 followers on Twitter. Over 1000 followers receive regular updates from GroundviewsVikalpa and Maatramon Instagram. The Groundviews WhatsApp group, relaunched in 2016, has seen active and continued engagement by leading civil society activists, diplomats and government officials, leading to the creation of a second group due to demand. It is currently the only contextual civic media news and information instant messaging group in the island.
Follow us here –
Twitter: @groundviews
Facebook: Groundviews
WhatsApp Group Invite: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GnrURWLas5i7Iu6rbj5jBb
Instagram: @groundviews and #snapshotlka

SC orders admission of student to Royal

Tuesday, January 9, 2018 
The Supreme Court has ruled that the interview panel of Royal College should have been mindful of the fact that it is the ambition of every parent to admit their child to a school of their choice.
‘They should have looked at the documents not in a stereo typed manner but in a reasonable manner of every child who come before them seeking admission to the school ‘. The Supreme Court made this direction to the Royal College principal and 12 other respondents who had violated the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 12(1) of the constitution to Rohan Rahul Ayushaman of Bambalapitiya by refusing admission to grade one at Royal College Colombo 7.
The Supreme Court ordered the respondents to take steps to admit Rohana Rahul to Grade One or to the appropriate grade at Royal College, Colombo 7 from now on.
The Supreme Court three-judge-Bench comprising Justice Eva Wanasundara, Justice Nalin Perera and Vijith Malalgoda observed that the interview panel had failed to evaluate the documents submitted on behalf of the second petitioner and to allocate marks to him.
The Supreme Court maintained the panel had acted arbitrarily by deciding not to grant marks by considering the concept of residence in a very abstract manner.
They had failed to consider the documents submitted on behalf of the petitioner when the documents clearly establish the residence of the petitioner.
Senior Counsel Ian Fernando with Counsel Sumudu Ratnayake and Natasha Samarasinghe under the instructions of Pradeepa Siriwardena appeared for the petitioners.

Legal Draftsman laments Most Govt Ministries don’t know what they are about!


By Ravi Ladduwahetty-2018-01-07

confusion worse confounded that's what these ministerial officers seem to be, utterly undecided, changing policies at their whim and fancy, requiring each draft to be amended a record 20-25 times.
They make it into a crazy chaotic frustrating process which could drive one up the wall, Legal Draftsman Deepani Sandhya Hewa Kumarajeewa, let out her exasperation in an interview with Ceylon Today on Friday morning when she said: "Most ministries know not what they are about!"

"Look at the National Audit Bill. We had to amend the Draft a record 22 times, simply because the Auditor-General's Department, a non-Ministerial Department of the Government, kept on changing our Draft with changes in the Government policy, each time we finalized the Draft Bill with the requisite changes," she spelt out in disdain.

This keeps happening with most of the Government Ministries too. There have been umpteen numbers of times where we have kept on accompanying the changes that those Ministries have sent us. They are not required to do any drafting. All they have to do is to send us the Policy Statements pertaining to that Ministry and we do the drafting. But it is really annoying when they keep on adding and deleting the government policies each time we finalize the drafts, she remarked.

These are some of the ground realities that she has published in the Annual Report, in her candid and lucid explanation of the constraints and drawbacks which confront her job. She also said that due to the constraints of adequate resource personnel in her department, she is forced to carry her work home.

The Legal Draftsman also sees this as a arduous constraint when the Draft Bills require the mandatory clause of having them in the two official languages which are Sinhalese and Tamil and there are the cascading effects of the delays in finalizing these Bills when the Policies are changed every now and then, she lamented.

"The tragedy of the episode is that there are a mere eight Senior Officers in the Department and 19 junior officers and two translators. They are also gradually leaving in search of better employment elsewhere due to overworked and underpaid," she said.

"The Junior Officers are not reliable all the time and they have to be supervised by the Senior Officers. It is I who has to supervise them as well and this is an extremely arduous exercise and especially when the Bills have to be drafted over and over again making us work day and night on it," she further said.

Some of the other Draft Bills which have been passed in Parliament have been the Motor Traffic Bill and the Kotelawela Defence University Bill and a few others which include some on NGOs as well.

The other Bills amended more than ten times and are yet to be finalized include the State Land (Special Provisions) Bill (13 times), the Land Development Ordinance (14 times), the General Sir John Kotelawala National Defence University Bill (10 times), the Sri Lanka Sustainable Development Bill (15 times) and the Voluntary Social Service (Registration and Supervision) Bill (11 times), she said in disgust.

Failures in contract administration cost billions to the country


Vehicles pass through the flyover at Rajagiriya which was ceremoniously opened by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe - Pic by Ruwan Walpola

logoTuesday, 9 January 2018

A few weeks ago, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe visited the Rajagiriya overpass construction site, built under the Road Development Authority. The PM also informed that the Rajagiriya flyover would be formally opened to the public on 8 January, nearly one year ahead of schedule.

Mobile phone bill case against Keheliya fixed for Jan.26

A corruption case against former Minister Keheliya Rambukwella and the former State Printing Corporation (SPC) Chairman for allegedly causing an unlawful loss of Rs.230,984 to the government was fixed on January 26 by Colombo Chief Magistrate, today.
The former Minister is alleged to have paid his mobile phone bill using SPC funds, while he functioned as the Mass Media Minister in 2012.
The order regarding the objections raised by defense over the maintainability of the charge sheet is to be delivered on the next date by Chief Magistrate Lal Ranasinghe Bandara.
The Bribery Commission alleged that the former Minister had induced the CPC chairman to pay his mobile phone bill from March 15, 2012 to April 14, 2012 causing an unlawful loss to the government, while serving as the Mass Media Minister.

How Israel hopes to make Palestinian refugees disappear

Palestinian children at a school run by UN refugee agency UNRWA in Khan Younis in the occupied Gaza Strip, September 2014. Israel hopes that by pressing to shut down UNRWA it can make Palestinian refugees disappear.
Hosam SalemAPA images

Ali Abunimah-8 January 2018

Israel has confirmed that it aims to destroy UNRWA, the UN agency that provides basic health, education and other humanitarian services to more than five million Palestinian refugees in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.

This comes days after the Trump administration suggested it planned to cut funding to the agency in retaliation for the Palestinian Authority’s objections to the US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

The US is UNRWA’s largest single donor and a funding cut off could have disastrous humanitarian consequences. In Gaza alone, one million Palestinians – half the population there – rely on UNRWA emergency rations, a number that has soared from just 80,000 in 2000 after years of Israeli siege and military assaults.

But for Israel, UNRWA is part of a problem to be eliminated: the existence of international institutions and agencies that support Palestinians and their rights.

UNRWA “needs to pass from the world”

Israel has long targeted the agency, politically and literally: during its assaults on Gaza, Israel has repeatedly bombed UNRWA schools and facilities, killing dozens.

“UNRWA is an organization that perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem. It also perpetuates the narrative of the right of return, as it were, in order to eliminate the State of Israel; therefore, UNRWA needs to pass from the world,” Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday at the start of Israel’s weekly cabinet meeting.

The Israeli prime minister urged that UNRWA support funds be gradually shifted to UNHCR – the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). “This is how to rid the world of UNRWA and deal with genuine refugee problems, to the extent that such remain,” Netanyahu added, calling most Palestinian refugees “fictitious refugees.”

Netanyahu is toeing a well-trodden line of the Israeli far-right that Palestinian refugees only exist because a special UN agency – UNRWA – was created to care for them, and not because Israel denies their internationally recognized right to return home.

Israel refuses to allow Palestinian refugees to return home solely because they are not Jews and therefore views them as a “demographic threat” to its continued existence as a Jewish supremacist state that denies equal rights to all its residents.

Far-right anti-Palestinian media in Israel and the US quickly began echoing Netanyahu’s message, giving new life to a years-long smear campaign against UNRWA.

Mandate to return

Ironically, Netanyahu’s proposal to dissolve UNRWA and hand over the mandate for looking after Palestinian refugees to UNHCR could actually strengthen the right of return.

UNHCR has a specific mandate not just to protect refugees while they are refugees but to work to facilitate the exercise of their right to return to their home countries.

UNRWA, by contrast, has no mandate to repatriate Palestinian refugees to the homes from which Israel expelled them, but only to provide relief until a political “solution” is found.

“What perpetuates the refugee crisis is the failure of the parties to deal with the issue,” UNRWA spokesperson Chris Gunness told The Electronic Intifada in reaction to Netanyahu’s comments. “This needs to be resolved by the parties to the conflict in the context of peace talks, based on UN resolutions and international law, and requires the active engagement by the international community.”

Until then, Gunness explained, “UNRWA is mandated by the General Assembly to continue with its services until a just and lasting solution is found for the Palestine refugees.”

Cut already made?

Last week, President Donald Trump and his UN ambassador Nikki Haley threatened to cut US aid to the Palestinians, but it was unclear if this included UNRWA or just the Palestinian Authority.

media report Friday claimed that the US had already withheld a $125 million payment to UNRWA due this month.

Gunness said UNRWA had seen the reports, but had “not been informed directly of a formal decision either way by the US administration.”

It would appear nonetheless that Israel is seeking to use the additional leeway given to it by the Trump administration to strike what it hopes will be decisive blows to end international support for the Palestinians.

Syria and Iraq air strikes drive doubling of civilian death toll: Report

Majority of 11,000 killed from 'explosive violence' in Syria and Iraq died in air strikes, says Action on Armed Violence

Smoke billows from an air attack by US-led coalition forces targeting IS in Mosul in July 2017 (AFP)
Monday 8 January 2018
Air strikes contributed to a doubling of civilian deaths in Iraq and Syria last year, according to a war monitor, raising fresh questions over the death toll resulting from the push to defeat the Islamic State (IS) group.
At least 15,399 civilians were killed globally from "explosive violence" in the first 11 months of 2017, according to Action on Armed Violence’s (AOAV) report drawn from coverage in English-language media.
Civilian deaths in Syria increased by 55 percent to 8,051 from the 2016 figure, while over the same period in Iraq, there was a 50 percent increase to 3,271.
AOAV said the majority of the total 15,399 civilian deaths were caused by air-launched weapons (58 percent), for the first time since it began reporting in 2011. The wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen are largely responsible for the increase.
Our minimum estimate of civilians killed by the US-led Coalition in anti-ISIS actions since 2014 now stands at 6,047 to 9,210. Around 65% of those deaths occurred in 2017.
The figures for Syria and Iraq are in stark contrast to those given by members of the US-led coalition, including Britain, which is operating in the skies above Syria and Iraq, and coincided with the US-led military operations to reclaim the IS strongholds of Mosul, in Iraq, and Raqqa, in Syria.
Russian and Syrian forces are thought to be responsible for more civilian casualties than the coalition, month-on-month.
The UN has said that more than 10,000 people have died in the Saudi-led war in Yemen, with 60 percent of those deaths resulting from air strikes. Saudi Arabia also denies it targets civilians, despite growing evidence by rights groups of dozens of attacks.
According to Airwars, which monitors deaths in Iraq and Syria, the estimated number of alleged civilian deaths as a result of US-led military operations against IS in Iraq and Syria last year was between 11,000 and 18,000.
An Associated Press report last month put the estimated number of civilian deaths in Mosul alone at 9,000. Combined with figures released by Amnesty International, Iraq Body Count and the UN, the number of dead could be as many as 11,000 people, while hundreds are still thought to be buried in the rubble.
The US-led coalition has admitted causing 800 deaths in Syria and Iraq since 2014, and claims to have caused 326 deaths in Iraq last year.
Britain denies its actions as part of the coalition have resulted in any civilian deaths. An MEE investigation revealed had dropped over 3,400 bombs on targets in Syria and Iraq since 2014.
Shows number of RAF bombs dropped on targets in Syria and Iraq up to September 2017
The AOAV report, which covers conflict zones globally, said ground-launched weapons accounted for 11 percent of civilian deaths and Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) accounted for 25 percent in the first 11 months of 2017, employed to devastating effect by Al-Shabaab in a truck bomb attack that killed 512 people in Somalia in October 2017.
Even so, for the first time since AOAV began to collect data, states were responsible for the majority of civilian deaths.
"Significantly, as air strikes are almost always used by state actors, rather than non-state groups, states were responsible for the majority of civilian deaths from explosive weapons for the first time since our records began,” AOAV said on a statement on their website.
Iain Overton, the executive director of AOAV, said of the findings: "These are stark figures that expose the lie that precision-guided missiles as used by state air forces do not lead to massive civilian harm.
READ MORE►
"When explosive weapons are used in towns and cities, the results are inevitable: innocent children, women and men will die. States need to ensure that their rules of engagement when using such weapons over populated areas are proportionate and are monitored with extreme care.
"We urge states to come together to discuss how to prevent such harm from increasing. 
"We support the political commitment being formulated that should encourage states to refrain from using explosive weapons over populated areas."

MEE contacted the US military for a response but did not receive a response by the time of publication. 

Rescue crews wrestle to tame China oil tanker fire; body of mariner found




JANUARY 7, 2018

BEIJING/SEOUL (Reuters) - Rescue crews wrestled to bring a blaze on an Iranian oil tanker off China’s east coast under control on Monday as fire raged for a second day following a collision with a grain ship, while the body of one of the 32 missing crew members was found on aboard.

Concerns were growing that the tanker, which hit a freight ship on Saturday night in the East China Sea and burst into flames, may explode and sink, the official China Central Television (CCTV) said on Monday, citing experts on the rescue team.

Poor weather continued to hamper the rescue work, Lu Kang, a spokesman at China’s foreign ministry, told a regular news briefing.

SPONSORED

The size of the oil spill from the ship and the extent of the environmental harm were not known, but the disaster has the potential to be the worst since 1991 when 260,000 tonnes of oil leaked off the Angolan coast.

The remains of one of the 32 mariners on board was found on Monday afternoon, Iranian and Chinese officials confirmed.

Mohammad Rastad, head of Iran’s Ports and Maritime Organisation, was quoted by the ISNA news agency as saying that the body had been sent to Shanghai for identification. The fate of the remaining 31 sailors is not known.

The Sanchi tanker (IMO:9356608) run by Iran’s top oil shipping operator, National Iranian Tanker Co, collided with the CF Crystal (IMO:9497050) on Saturday evening about 160 nautical miles off China’s coast near Shanghai and the mouth of the Yangtze River Delta.

Chinese state media CCTV showed footage on Monday of a flotilla of boats dousing the flames with water as plumes of thick dark smoke continued to billow from the tanker.

One portion appeared to show the fire had been extinguished, although this could not be independently confirmed. China’s Ministry of Transport and Maritime Safety would not comment when asked if the fire was out.

“The Chinese government takes maritime accidents like this very seriously, and has already dispatched many search and rescue teams to the scene to carry out search and rescue,” said the foreign ministry’s Lu said.

China sent four rescue ships and three cleaning boats to the site, South Korea dispatched a ship and a helicopter, while a U.S. Navy military aircraft searched an area of about 3,600 square nautical miles (12,350 sq km) for crew members.

The Panama-registered tanker was sailing from Iran to South Korea, carrying 136,000 tonnes of condensate, an ultra-light and highly volatile crude. That is equivalent to just under 1 million barrels, worth about $60 million, based on global crude oil prices.

Ship tracking data shows the collision occurred in waters not frequently used by large vessels like tankers, dry-bulk carriers or container ships. Most ships travel either closer to the Chinese coast in the west or more nearby to Japan in the east.

The freight ship, which was carrying U.S. grain, suffered limited damage and the 21 crew members, all Chinese nationals, were rescued.

China’s transport ministry said the CF Crystal were being taken to the port of Luhuashan, just south of Shanghai, where authorities will start an investigation into the cause of the incident.
(For a graphic on ship collision off China's coast click tmsnrt.rs/2CBgqai)

COLORLESS, ODORLESS AND HARMFUL

Lu said it was too soon to discuss how victims of the disaster may be compensated, and that compensation and other questions would be addressed after an investigation into the accident is complete.

Bad weather made it hard for the rescue crews to get access to the tanker, but toxic gas from the burning oil posed a major risk.

When condensate meets water, it evaporates quickly and can cause large-scale explosion as it reacts with air and turns into a flammable gas, the transportation ministry said on Monday.

Africa’s Generational War

Protesters in the Zimbabwean capital of Harare cheer a military vehicle during a demonstration demanding President Robert Mugabe's resignation on Nov. 18. (Jekesai Njikizana/AFP/Getty Images)Protesters in the Zimbabwean capital of Harare cheer a military vehicle during a demonstration demanding President Robert Mugabe's resignation on Nov. 18. (Jekesai Njikizana/AFP/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.
BY -
JANUARY 5, 2018, 11:16 AM
NAIROBI — In Kenya, President Uhuru Kenyatta finally secured a second term on Nov. 28 after two flawed elections, outbreaks of violence, and a series of court battles. Across the continent in Liberia, the former soccer star George Weah won a presidential election after a similar court battle had delayed that country’s first peaceful democratic transfer of power since 1944. And in Zimbabwe, President Robert Mugabe was finally deposed last year after 37 years in power — only to be replaced by Emmerson Mnangagwa, a ruthless former national security minister responsible for some of the regime’s bloodiest excesses.

It has been a dizzying few months, but two important but contradictory trends have emerged. The first is the deepening of a democratic recession, made evident by the recent assault on presidential term limits in places such as Rwanda and Uganda. This process has been driven by elites’ development of new and subtle forms of political and electoral manipulation — including the use of counterterrorism laws, financial aid from Western nations, and geopolitical arm-wrestling over resources with China — to stymie the political opposition and entrench the power of ruling elites.

The second trend is the continuing resilience of political optimism among African voters, especially the youth, who overwhelmingly support democracy. Young people made up the bulk of demonstrators who battled with police in recent months from Togo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to Kenya and Zambia. Their optimism has been buoyed in part by the rise of an aggressively independent media, the maturing of institutions such as the judiciary, and by the explosion of nongovernmental organizations fighting to hold governments accountable despite increasingly restrictive conditions.

Indeed, a massive generational struggle is now underway between entrenched elites and impatient youthful populations across the continent. In several countries, institutions that were once firmly under the thumb of elites are showing glimmers of independence — from the media (including social media) to the church and the judiciary. Never in Africa’s independent history has such a broad alliance stood for democracy against elites with deep financial and security ties to powerful countries in the wider world.
Never in Africa’s independent history has such a broad alliance stood for democracy against elites with deep financial and security ties to powerful countries in the wider world.
 The question now is whether this grassroots democratic consolidation, exemplified by the massive anti-Mugabe protests and the armies of lawyers and human rights campaigners fighting for transparency in Kenya, can check or begin to reverse the tide of authoritarianism being unleashed by elites from above.

In the long term, demographic shifts make democratic change seem inevitable. Africa’s population is the youngest, fastest growing, and, in many places, the most rapidly urbanizing on the planet. The individuals driving this youth bulge are increasingly globalized in their aspirations, more digitally savvy than preceding generations, and far more impatient with the authoritarian leaders their parents long ago learned to tolerate.

But change won’t happen overnight. Political transitions in Africa have always been fraught affairs. It was far worse in the first three decades after most sub-Saharan African countries gained independence in the 1960s, when civil wars raged across much of the continent and coups were all too common. Since then, losing an election or handing over power because of constitutional term or age limits has become less of a novelty, even if the Sudanese telecoms billionaire Mo Ibrahim has found few deserving recipients for his $5 million prize for democratically elected heads of state who step down on time and with a relatively clean slate. (Since the annual Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership was created in 2006, it has been awarded only five times.)

In the 1990s, after the fall of the Berlin Wall heralded the reintroduction of multiparty politics across the continent, 48 new constitutions were promulgated in Africa. Thirty-three of them included term limits for heads of state — most of them two five-year terms. But by 2015, a dramatic reversal was underway. In at least 24 of the 33 countries with term limits, attempts were made to remove them — half of them successful, as was the case in Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi. Elsewhere, authoritarian leaders clung to power through other means — by delaying elections indefinitely, as President Joseph Kabila has done in Congo, or by rigging them cleverly enough to pass the muster of international observers, as Kenyatta has done in Kenya.

Aiding and abetting this trend toward authoritarianism were Western countries worried about the spread of Islamic extremism in Africa. The United States in particular has lavished military and counterterrorism aid on African governments with little regard for their democratic credentials — so long as they were willing to fight jihadis. In many cases, these governments grew more repressive, using anti-terrorism legislation and other legal and extralegal instruments to cow the opposition and silence dissenting voices while U.S. security assistance continued to flow. Niger experienced an erosion of political rights between 2015 and 2017, according to Freedom House, while its government deepened military cooperation with the United States. Other important U.S. allies, such as Ethiopia, Uganda, Cameroon, and Chad, have experienced democratic backsliding or were authoritarian to begin with.

Kenya’s story is particularly disappointing. It has been one of America’s most important counterterrorism partners in the troubled Horn of Africa region and also had the dubious distinction of leading the continent in extrajudicial killings by the police in 2016, according to Amnesty International. Abuses by the security forces marred the most recent election campaign as well, with more than 60 Kenyans killed by the police between the Aug. 8, 2017, election and the court-ordered rerun in October. None of these murders has been successfully investigated, and Kenyatta later praised the police for their actions during the election period.

There have also been attacks on organizations promoting human rights and good governance, many of which sought relief from the courts, which were themselves under attack by Kenyatta. Last September, Chief Justice David Maraga was forced to make a rare statement pleading for the security of his judges after the president threatened to “deal with” the judiciary, and on the eve of the election rerun the bodyguard of the deputy chief justice was shot in broad daylight in an apparent assassination attempt. Kenyatta’s subsequent victory came amid an opposition boycott and 39 percent turnout — the lowest in decades. For the first time in 50 years, Kenyans boycotted the country’s Independence Day celebrations on Dec. 12, forcing the president to address a near-empty stadium.

As leaders have rolled back democratic gains, the attitudes of ordinary Africans toward democracy and its accompanying freedoms remain robust. According to a 2016 Afrobarometer poll, 67 percent of Africans prefer democracy to other forms of government. Meanwhile, the independent media continues to blossom across the continent; whereas in the 1980s there were only a handful of countries with a free press, the media in Botswana, Ghana, South Africa, Cape Verde, Comoros, Burkina Faso, Niger, Lesotho, Kenya, Ivory Coast, and a number of other countries have become an essential part of the democratic infrastructure. Organizations that didn’t exist two decades ago have come to play a similar role in ensuring political accountability.

And although Kenya’s recent elections were deeply flawed, the government didn’t dare choke off the internet or shut down social media, as more authoritarian regimes such as Ethiopia’s and Uganda’s have done in recent years. That’s because Kenya’s oligarch class — unlike in many other countries in the region — comprises businesspeople, not soldiers. The internet and financial technology are essential to the country’s vibrant and increasingly globalized economy.

Across the continent, the trend at the grassroots level is toward more democracy, not less. Authoritarian leaders are still clinging desperately to power, and in the short term they may well succeed in halting or reversing democratic strides. But the younger, more impatient generation now coming of age has corrupt, authoritarian elites squarely in its sights. In Zimbabwe, Mugabe’s resignation is merely the beginning of the next chapter in the country’s democratic journey — one that will pit the pro-democratic youth against the corrupt old guard.

Democracy is messy, and the next phase of this generational contest will be messy, too. But Africa’s youth are redefining the rules of political engagement and will determine the continent’s future.

Daniel Ellsberg: Trump and Kim Jong-Un playing ‘nuclear chicken’

-6 JAN 2018Europe Editor and Presenter
Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg on President Trump, Nixon and nuclear war.

The Havoc That Is Created For The Sake Of A Minority



By Mass L. Usuf –January 8, 2018


With the Presidency of George W. Bush, the agenda for the so called new world order gained momentum. The genuine belief that they have a strategic and moral “right” to control world affairs. This interventionist foreign policy was an opportune time for the protagonists of Zionism. The Bush administration was filled with neo conservatives. There partners were either Zionists or those inextricably subjugated by the Zionists.

The world will never forget the Neo-con/Zionist hatchet man Collin Powell convincingly making a visual presentation at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The consistently blatant lies espoused by Bush and his Neo-con/Zionists that Saddam Hussein was possessing WMDs was proved to be a total farce and an unforgivable act of deceiving the international community. The Zionists influenced the American administration to commit acts of war or stir up sedition in independent sovereign nations, directly or by proxy.

Greater Israel Project

Jews are only 2% of the American population. The Zionists are an insignificant percentage of this 2% but extremely powerful. In perpetuating the ‘Greater Israel’ project Bush and his bunch of spin doctors, ably supported by the Zionist controlled media bosses, were used to the maximum. The current American administration is only a continuation of this exercise.

The Greater Israel plan is to fragment all Arab and Muslim states into smaller geographical borders and/or weaken and divide them on ethnic or sectarian grounds. This will automatically result in Israel becoming the dominant regional power. Besides dividing Iraq, the plan calls for the division of Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Libya and Syria. The extended plan envisages the breaking up of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan. If one looks at the middle eastern countries today its direct consequences are evident; Instability, bloodshed, destruction, starvation and epidemics.  States like Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, have been reduced to ruins. One can witness the Greater Israel Project plan being meticulously executed.

Criminals Going Scot-free

The Israelis supported by Washington have committed multiple acts of genocide against the Palestinian people. It has showed utter contempt towards hundreds of UN resolutions, violated international treatises on the use of banned weapons (Israel’s use of incendiary bombs – white phosphorus – against Palestinian civilians) and grossly violated basic human rights. All of these and much more of the combined American/Israeli atrocities make them war criminals either by direct action or complicity. Unfortunately, no one has the temerity to take these criminals to task.

It is public knowledge that in 2007, Moreno-Ocampo, Former International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor claimed that then-US President George W. Bush may face a war crimes investigation (pending jurisdictional requirements) stemming from the conduct of coalition forces in Iraq. The ICC was founded in 2002 by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) to “bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide”.

Though President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute in 2000, the Clinton administration did not submit the treaty to the Senate for ratification. In 2002, President George W. Bush unsigned the treaty effectively exonerating himself and his henchmen from any legal obligations.

Read More

Angela Merkel at bay as Social Democrats to set high coalition price

German chancellor faces hard talks with centre-left on Sunday to secure fourth term, but rightwingers may cause trouble

 Angela Merkel and Martin Schulz shake hands before exploratory talks about forming a new coalition government. Photograph: Hannibal Hanschke/Reuters

-Sun 7 Jan ‘18 

Germany’s beleaguered chancellor returned to the negotiating table on Sunday with politicians from the Social Democratic party (SPD) and representatives of her Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), to stave off the end of “Merkelism” by re-establishing the coalition that governed Germany from 2013 to 2017.

Angela Merkel’s efforts will involve tough bargaining with the centre-left, which eyes control over the country’s well-stocked state coffers as a reward for entering a new coalition – in the knowledge that failure of the talks could spell the end of the Merkel era.

“I think that it can be done. We will work very swiftly and very intensively,” Merkel told journalists as she arrived at the Social Democrats’ headquarters on Sunday.

“I am going into these talks with optimism. At the same time it is clear to me that we will have an enormous piece of work in front of us over the next few days but we are willing to take it on and to bring a good result.”

Following the collapse of talks to form an unorthodox “Jamaica” coalition with the Free Democrats and the Green party in November, a centrist alliance would guarantee the leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) her best chance of a stable government for a fourth term in office.

But historically poor results for both parties at last September’s elections mean that a new “grand coalition” could barely lay claim to such a name, and sliding polls are increasing pressure on the two political tribes to retreat behind orthodox party lines.

The SPD leader, Martin Schulz, who has previously ruled out forming a coalition with Merkel, has to win over a highly sceptical party membership that will get a final vote on whether to enter an alliance with the CDU, and is likely to seek protections for increased social security spending and infrastructure investment.

Key figures in the SPD believe Schulz can only guarantee such promises by laying claim to the previously CDU-run finance ministry. A centre-left finance minister could relax Germany’s balanced budget rules and work to meet French president Emmanuel Macron’s goals for reforming the eurozone.

The previous SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel’s decision to pick the economic and foreign ministries as trophy posts in 2013 is now widely seen within the party as a strategic mistake. But Schulz’s proposals will meet fierce resistance from the conservatives on the other side of the table, many of whom look towards the rightward-lurching government of the new Austrian chancellor, Sebastian Kurz, as a model to emulate.

Facing state elections in Bavaria in the autumn this year, Merkel’s allies in the CSU in particular have ratcheted up their rhetoric. Politicians from the party have over the past week called for cuts in benefits to refugees, mandatory age tests for asylum seekers, and extending the suspension of Germany’s policy to reunite refugees with their families.

In an comment article for the newspaper Die Welt, former transport minister Alexander Dobrindt called for a “conservative revolution” against a left-liberal mainstream he saw as typified by the culture of Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg district – a hotbed of dissident culture in 1980s East Germany, now itself a byword for gentrification.

At Friday’s party conference in Seeon-Seebruck in southern Bavaria, the CSU leader, Horst Seehofer, risked antagonising Merkel by inviting the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán, the European Union’s most vocal critic of the German chancellor’s open-borders stance during the 2015 refugee crisis. The populist leader said on Friday he believed 2018 would be “the year of restoring the will of the people in Europe”.

Merkel, meanwhile, goes into negotiations from one of the weakest positions of her leadership. A survey by the public broadcaster ARD has shown that more Germans prefer fresh elections to a renewal of last term’s grand coalition. A majority (69%) of those polled said Merkel’s party had failed to address concerns caused by the refugee crisis, and her personal approval ratings have dropped since the September elections. However, 53% still say that they would approve of Merkel being the next chancellor, and as many as 93% said she remained a good chancellor.

The 63-year-old has rejected a so-called “KoKo” or “cooperation coalition” option floated by the Social Democrats, which could involve the SPD and the CDU/CSU forming an alliance and agreeing on some issues while leaving trickier points to parliamentary debates.

Shortly before Christmas, the tabloid Bild quoted the senior CDU politician Norbert Lammert as saying that Merkel would step down if talks with the Social Democrats collapsed and there were fresh elections – comments which the former leader of the Bundestag later denied having made.

German media have tipped the Saarland state premier, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, as one of the few successor candidates who would fit Merkel’s mould of pragmatic centrist conservatism. But the CDU politician is relatively unknown even in her own country, and would need a spell in a ministerial post to build up her profile.

One leading German public intellectual has predicted that the next government is unlikely to last a full four-year term, even if Merkel and Schulz manage to come to an agreement in the coming weeks.

 “We are in a transition phase,” said the political scientist Herfried Münkler in an interview with Die Welt. “Since we are not used to transitional phases – unlike the Italians, for example – the end of Merkelism is a special situation for us, and an exciting one.”

Münkler, who is also a bestselling author of books on global history, said that any political era required a phase of renewal and revitalisation after around 25 years. “We are without doubt in the middle of such a phase,” he declared, “where the decline of a politically leading figure goes hand in hand with significant changes in the surrounding conditions.”

Exploratory talks are expected to last for about a week. On 21 January, SPD delegates will decide at a special party conference whether to start proper talks, which could last until mid-February. The Social Democrats will then allow their membership a vote on whether to enter a coalition with the CDU.

STICKING POINTS

Immigration

Wrangling over fallout from the European refugee crisis dominated last year’s failed coalition talks with the liberal Free Democratic party and Greens, and is likely to top this year’s negotiations agenda. While the two parties will easily agree to speed up deportations of rejected asylum seekers, Martin Schulz, leader of the centre-left Social Democratic party, rejected conservative proposals to extend the current ban on reuniting refugees with their families, which runs out on 16 March.

Healthcare

The SPD wants wholesale reform of health insurance, equalising the contributions made by employers and employees and unifying the two-tier system of private and public health insurances. Politicians from Merkel’s CDU say the plans would put private health insurers out of business.

Infrastructure

Germany’s two big centre parties may find it easier to find common ground on investing in the country’s healthy fiscal surplus in a marquee infrastructure project, such as a state-funded house-building programme to take steam out of the overheating rental market in cities.