Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, December 22, 2017

Education is not examinations only

2017-12-23
In the Vision 2025 programme for sustainable, eco-friendly and all-inclusive development, the National Unity Government has quite rightly given the highest priority to education. All students in public, private and international schools will have 13 years of education. Even those who fail at the General Certificate of Education, Ordinary Level examination will be encouraged to go in to a vocational training field such as high technology or other skilled areas for which there is a good 
job market.   

In addition the government has given health and life insurance policies for some 4.5 million children in all schools. This has been widely welcomed as being immensely beneficial specially for poor and middle class children because there had been many cases where one major illness has made the family bankrupt.   

 The government is also planning to set up e-classes in universities and schools with the highest technology being used for students to rise to the highest level and get well-paid jobs here or overseas.   

We hope the government also will give priority to the setting up of green schools or universities where there will be solar-energy panels, classes that work directly by sun or wind power without a roof and with provision for tent cover if there is rain.   

These green schools, working well in countries such as Singapore and Malaysia, also have recycling systems for excess food and it is often turned into organic manure.   

Yet as in all good things there is a negative and even dangerous side to high technology including smart phones. Specially underage children who have been unwisely given such smart phones by their parents are known to have fallen into deep trouble with girls being raped and forced to commit suicide. At the GCE Ordinary Level examination which ended on Wednesday there were several incidents where students had allegedly tried to use smart phones to help them find answers and explanations in violation of examination laws.   

In Piliyandala on Thursday, a youth who allegedly impersonated an O/L student and sat on behalf of him for the examination, was taken into custody at the examination centre. According to Police the arrest was carried out on a complaint made by a Deputy Commissioner of Examinations. It is learnt that the individual, who was arrested at noon during the exam, had pasted his picture on the candidate’s identity card in a bid to impersonate him.   

The 23-year-old suspect, a resident of Udawalawe, was produced before the Piliyandala Magistrate on Thursday.   

Overall in education, it would be prudent to follow the principles at the Subodhi Institute of Integral and Holistic Education. This institute was founded by Rev. Dr. Mervyn Fernando, an intellectual giant of the country, who died this week and laid to rest yesterday. Subodhi students were taught and moulded not only to pass examinations but to be responsible, eco-friendly citizens who would ask not what  their country had done for them but what they have done or are doing for their country.

 In most countries including the United States, Russia and China, cyber crime or even a cyber war is reportedly taking place in areas ranging from elections to business in the stock market and even in education. While giving smart phones or laptops to students, the government needs to take effective steps to ensure that cyber crimes do not take place especially in schools or universities. If that happens instead of producing good and responsible citizens we will have more criminals using cyber tactics for corruption and fraud.     

Sri Lanka’s vote at UN


article_image
By SANJA DE SILVA JAYATILLEKA- 

On the 21st of December, the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly against the unilateral position on Jerusalem adopted by the world’s sole superpower, the USA. The UNGA resolution expressed "deep regret" over decisions "concerning the status of Jerusalem" and that Jerusalem "is a final status issue to be resolved through negotiations in line with relevant UN resolutions."

Sri Lanka voted in favour of the UNGA Resolution, joining a total of 128 countries, with 35 abstaining and 9 voting against. The vote paints a clear picture of world opinion on the matter, and the government of Sri Lanka is to be congratulated for standing on the right side of such an important international issue.

The entire affair also paints a picture of the United States at the UN. When the same resolution failed to be adopted at the Security Council last week, it was the US veto that was solely responsible, with the rest of the 14 members unanimous in their vote in favour.

In an interesting procedural maneuver, Turkey (a NATO member) and Yemen called for an Emergency session of the UNGA using Resolution 377 (adopted in 1950) to get around the Security Council veto, where they had earlier presented the same resolution. This was only the 10th ‘emergency special session’ of the UNGA in its history.

Resolution 377 says "if the Security Council, because of lack of unanimity of the permanent members, fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security in any case where there appears to be a threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, the General Assembly shall consider the matter immediately with a view to making appropriate recommendations to Members for collective measures, including in the case of a breach of the peace or act of aggression the use of armed force when necessary, to maintain or restore international peace and security."

Clearly, most of the UN member states agreed that any unilateral measure regarding the status of Jerusalem was an immediate threat to international peace and security, and that they had to do all they could to avert it. The US disagreed. It set about using its status as the world’s sole super power on whose largesse many less fortunate countries depended, aside from being the biggest contributor to the United Nations, to attempt to secure a vote against the resolution.

A letter of warning was dispatched by US ambassador Nicky Haley, who made it clear that those who voted against the US would suffer consequences. She wrote "As you consider your vote, I encourage you to know the President and the US take this vote personally…The President will be watching this vote carefully and has requested I report back on those who voted against us". That letter made no difference to 128 countries who voted in favour and 35 countries hedged their bets by abstaining. There was an eruption of applause at the announcement of the results.

The US at the UN takes things very personally indeed. Before the UNGA vote, its Ambassador tweeted "we don't expect those we've helped to target us". However, it seems that the rest of the world doesn't think this is appropriate. The majority of member states expect that important issues are evaluated in terms of humanity, peace and security, international law, and previous UN resolutions.

Six years earlier, during the Obama administration, a similar vote was held in Paris, at the UNESCO, where Palestine sought membership of that organization. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton flew to Paris to lobby the Ambassadors against the proposal. There too, the US threatened to withdraw funding to the UNESCO. The UNESCO’s General Conference of October 2011 took the risk and the resolution granting membership to Palestine passed with more than the required two-thirds majority. Sri Lanka played an active role to ensure its success. As captured in the world’s newspapers the next day, there was clapping, hugging and congratulations in the conference hall and the US lost no time in withholding its substantial contributions to the organization. UNESCO survived, also as the world’s moral conscience.

In this context, it seems fortunate that the world is heading away from unipolarity and resultant hegemonism. The Diplomat reported on December 15th that a US congressional committee tasked with investigating "national security implications of U.S.-China relations, including Chinese military plans, strategy and doctrine," found that China is now "in its region, the dominant military power".

The Diplomat also reports some concerns of those who find multipolarity worrying: "Beijing has also begun to flex its muscles on the world stage. On August 1, 2017, China opened its first permanent overseas military base in Djibouti, strategically located near the Gulf of Aden, adjacent to the Arabian Sea – and also a short drone flight away from Camp Lemonnier, a major US counterterrorism hub and America’s only permanent military base in Africa."

China’s advances in unmanned aerial and underwater vehicles, had been on display at the Guangzhou Airshow in February 2017, where it is reported that China demonstrated "a record-breaking formation of 1,000 rotary-wing drones based on pre-programmed routes" causing worries according to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) that "such swarming techniques could be used to create a distributed armed system which, coupled with AI capabilities, could be used for saturating and overwhelming the defenses of high-value weapons platforms such as aircraft carriers. This could impact the outcome of a potential U.S.-Chinese engagement in the South or East China Sea." (The Diplomat, 15th December)

This and other developments including ‘counter-space’ technology, shows impressive military accomplishment. Unfortunately when one big power is magnificently militarized, it is surely inevitable that others in their gun-sights would do the same.

Commenting on the new US National Security Strategy released this week, Defend Democracy Press warns that the document recommends "that a buildup of the US nuclear arsenal is ‘essential to prevent nuclear attack, nonnuclear strategic attacks, and large scale conventional aggression,’ strongly suggesting that the US military is prepared to launch a nuclear first strike in response to a nonnuclear challenge." (Bill Van Auken, Defend Democracy Press, 22/12/2017)

While most people would rather see far less spent on weapon systems and more invested in food security in the world, and all big powers signed up to non-proliferation, it is still very much an aspiration. Reality dictates that it is better for less fortunate countries to have more than one such big power able to dictate terms and act as a deterrent. China has thus far not sat on us for UN votes.

China’s OBO Rand its financing by the Beijing led AIIB, the Export-Import Bank of China and China Development Bank, is also viewed with enormous suspicion.Many developing countries have found all these Chinese initiatives to have lifted them out of economic stagnation into renewed growth and connectivity.

Sri Lanka has seen its roads, its ports and its skyline change in a relatively short period precisely due to that massive investment. For a country emerging from a decades-long war having lost most of its budget and a large number of citizens to its bloody destructiveness, facing propaganda based war-crimes charges and an economy in need of assistance, the emergence of an Asian power willing to help it recover was clearly in its interest. Sri Lanka applied for observer status of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in 2012. It sees BRICS as a positive development, representing a powerful coalition of developing states from the South, able to influence decisions internationally.

Multipolarity gives us options. It is manifestly the case that threats will be issued and hands will be tied on issues, including important moral ones. It was a relief when Russia decisively stepped in to save the day in Syria, enabling enough of its economic infrastructure and state structure (bureaucracy) to be kept intact to begin rebuilding that country. Mercifully, Syria didn't go the way of Iraq and Libya. Russia’s active role in fighting terrorism has brought positive results for the world. Sri Lanka has good relations with Russia, despite the recent ‘pest in the tea-chest’ and that could have been averted with a little forethought and timely discussions before the ban on asbestos.

Sri Lanka is not out of the woods yet internationally, with UN resolutions on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The US threat on aid must weigh on the minds of its leaders. Then again, China’s influence in the region must weigh on the minds of the US. Sri Lanka has a history of maintaining the balance that is essential for a successful foreign policy. Both China and Russia, and the other emerging Asian economies, India and Indonesia, voted in favour of the UNGA resolution this week. Sri Lanka did well to exercise its moral duty along side them to retain its faith in the multilateral system to make this world a less dangerous place.

[The writer is author of ‘MISSION IMPOSSIBLE GENEVA’, Vijitha Yapa, Colombo, 2017]

Russia issues first day cover with Dambulla Vihara printed on stamp on the day it banned SL tea - SL buffoons boycott occasion !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 22.Dec.2017, 11.30PM) Russia imposed the ban on purchase of Sri Lanka tea on the 18 th of December , and on that same day a first day cover and a stamp were issued in Russia to mark the completion of 60 years of diplomatic relationship between SL and Russia. The stamp carried the picture of Dambulla vihara and the stamp was priced at 35 rubles. An official function was held at 11.00 a.m on that day , but neither our Ambassador in Russia, Saman Weerasinghe nor any other staff member of our Embassy participated in the event , and they have boycotted it. Until today the Russian government had not even been thanked.  Unbelievably ,  the SL media  ministry too has not even released a press communique  that such a stamp with Dambulla Vihara was issued in Russia .

The most intriguing and reprehensible part of this villainy and neglectful attitude  is , the chairman of the Selacine Institution Shantha Bandara who is engaged in the propaganda  activities of every SL government Institution like  Ruwan Ferdinands, the media secretary of media and finance minister Mangala Samaraweera , who were  on a tour of Russia during that period along with Saman the SL ambassador to Russia have been deaf , dumb and blind to this historic event associated with SL  . It is a pity  while ignoring the launching of the stamp and neglecting  their duties they have been drinking Vodka and enjoying  the flesh of body peddlers .
If SL has boycotted its own  stamp because of the tea ban imposed by Russia , it I certain SL will not be able to maintain any diplomatic relationship with the country nor do anything via that country. Those who are responsible for this diabolic and reckless conduct must provide answers to the people of SL. If they cannot they must resign from their posts before they are booted out.  
The photo of the  historic stamp with the picture of Dambulla Vihara issued by Russia is herein.

 ( Lanka e news thanks those who forwarded this   photograph) .
---------------------------
by     (2017-12-22 21:45:34)

punishing voters for electing rogues


Anticipate reports of violence-including murders-related to the elections, in the coming days
Why are people so keen to get nominations for themselves or their relatives, friends and supporters?
Ironically the candidates too know that people know what their intentions and objectives are
Others want to see their party and their favourite candidates winning, but without knowing why
2017-12-22
The television channels showed on Monday a man weeping after his name allegedly had been struck off from a nomination paper despite a promise to include him in the list by the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) led by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

In another incident a woman was seen taken to the Police station by the Police personnel to record a statement, while she was launching a Satyagraha after she too was not given a chance to contest at the forthcoming Local Government elections scheduled to be held on February 10.

In another unfortunate incident a man who had first been dropped from a candidates list of a political party and then been included in the same list had died of the shock he had been subjected to when he was dropped earlier. Media also reported an incident where a group of men had stormed into a house and forcibly taken away a nomination paper that had already been prepared and was ready to be tendered. In a similar incident a United National Party (UNP) local leader is said to have unsuccessfully tried to grab a nomination paper prepared by his party men.

Complaints of letting down aspiring candidates by political parties and conflicts among various political parties over seat sharing are being reported from the north as well as the south these days.
In the north, according to Tamil newspapers, the People’s Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE) has decided to withdraw from the election campaign as it had been let down by the Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK) in seat sharing.

Some people have switched their parties after being disappointed over the non-inclusion of their names or their supporters’ names in the nomination papers.

The Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP) member of the Joint Opposition, Parliamentarian Sriyani Wijewickrama, who joined the Sri Lankan Freedom Party (SLFP) two weeks ago, falls to that category.
People know this by experience. Even a Municipal Councilor does not draw a salary of Rs. 20,000. But most of those who did not own even a bicycle when they were first elected to a Local Government body would be an owner of at least a car, at the end of his tenure

Her supporters have allegedly been ignored by the SLPP leaders in Ampara.
All these stories indicate how much people are keen to contest elections even for the lowest level of the people’s representation bodies - the Municipal Councils, Urban Councils and Pradeshiya Sabhas. 
We can also anticipate reports of violence-including murders-related to the elections, in the coming days.

Why are people so keen to get nominations for themselves or their relatives, friends and supporters?
Those who fight for slots in nomination papers might say that they are so fervent to be at least a member of a Local Government body to serve his or her people.

But the entire country is well aware that it is not their objective. It is public knowledge that they want to serve themselves, and not the people.

People know this by experience. Even a Municipal Councilor does not draw a salary of Rs. 20,000. But most of those who did not own even a bicycle when they were first elected to a Local Government body would be an owner of at least a car, at the end of his tenure.

And ironically the candidates too know that people know what their intentions and objectives are.
Yet, they would keep on bragging on their “dedications” to the people. On the other hand a section of the voters support these politicians with the hope of getting favours, such as jobs, after the latter’s election.

Others want to see their party and their favourite candidates winning, but without knowing why. They want just to be on the winning side.

Therefore, they are not concerned about corruption – whatever the magnitude of it may be - by their party or the candidate they support.

This is the real politics on the ground despite politicians, media and the civil society discussing serious issues such as democracy, corruption-free society and good governance.

No party has any development plan or strategy for the country or for the locality they represent. No such plans or strategies are being discussed within any party.

Party committees at their highest as well
as grass root level discuss only the strategies for the victory of the party and certain individuals.
Thus, the discussion on the oncoming election has turned out to be one about rejecting rogues and thieves and not about electing people capable of developing the area concerned.

The debate is about what not to do and not what to do by the politicians. As a Tamil saying goes, people do not beg for alms but to hold the dog back (Pitchchai Vendaam, Naayai Pidi) .
Against this backdrop another debate over the importance of the candidate (and the party) is also developing with some people arguing that the voters have to consider the merits of the candidate, irrespective of the party he has been fielded by.

In a recent TV debate Deputy Minister Ajith P. Perera representing the UNP argued that people must consider the candidate over the party he represents, while Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) MP Sunil Handunnetti contending the other way around. In the north Chief Minister C.V.Wigneswaran is campaigning for the merits of individual candidates while Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran is arguing in favour of the party over the candidate.
The Executive Director of the People’s Action for Free and Fair Election (PAFFREL), Rohana Hettiarachchi also during a media meet this week had requested the voters to consider the merits of the candidate.

All these are contextual arguments. Perera seems to be unable to give an assurance on the genuineness of his party, especially in the light of the recent revelations during the Presidential Commission on Central Bank bond transactions, whereas Handunnetti was prepared to give an assurance in respect of his party.

Wigneswaran is in favour of merit of individual candidates as he can neither campaign for the TNA nor the rival TULF led alliance in the north, whereas Sumanthiran campaigns for his party, the TNA.
Deputy Minister Perera during the same debate countered his own argument by contending that areas under the Local Government bodies could be developed only by entrusting those bodies to the ruling party of the Central Government. Apart from this contradiction, this is in fact an undue influence and a veiled threat on the voter, as made by other ruling parties as well in the past, since he implies that the government would not provide funds for the local authorities run by the Opposition. This is not good governance, Mr. Perera or any other politician can argue in this way only when they are in power.
This is a manifestation of the mindset to win elections by hook or by crook.

It is against this backdrop one has to look into the suggestion by Deputy Elections Commissioner M.M. Mohamed to impose a fine on voters, who do not vote at elections, as in some other countries.
He had stated, according to Tamil media that the State has to waste a huge amount of money when less people tend to vote at elections, while the Elections Commission makes arrangements for all registered voters to vote.

If in fact there is a plummeting trend in voting one might blame the politicians for the frustration among the voters.

However, it is the voters who elect the rogue politicians to office and it is they, who must ultimately be blamed for what has befallen them.

Wiggie Blasts Dilan Over NPC Expenditure


December 23 2017

Chief Minister of the Northern Provincial Council (NPC) C.V. Wigneswaran has taken issue with a statement made by the Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Highways Dilan Perera with respect to NPC Expenditure.

Wigneswaran, writing directly to Perera, refers to a news item in the Virakesari (December 21, 2017) which quotes Perera querying Wigneswaran about what he was going to do with Malaysian aid when he was unable to spend monies given by the Government of Sri Lanka.

Wigneswaran claims that this is an oft-repeated charge and attributes such to ‘ulterior motives’ by his political opponents who he supposes deliberately sling mud at the administrative machinery of the NVP and its governing party (Tamil National Alliance) ‘in order to mislead and misguide the general public.’

In order to appraise Perera as well as the general public, Wigneswaran has provided correspondence with the General Treasury as well as the ‘Financial Expenditure Report of the NPC (2015-2017).
He demonstrates that at the end of the Financial year 2017 Rs 850.12 million had not been released from the Treasury and calls upon Perera to ‘rectify statements made blaming the Chief Minister.’

Read More

Sri Lanka defies US along with 127 other states



 


Sri Lanka, along with 127 other UN States, voted in favour of the UN resolution rejecting US President Donald Trump’s decision on December 6 to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Belgium, North Korea, China, Egypt, Finland, Canada, France, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Russia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom were among the 128 countries which voted in favour of the resolution at an emergency session of the UN General Assembly held on Thursday.

Nine countries including the US, Israel, Honduras and Guatemala voted against it while 35 countries including Argentina and Australia abstained from voting.

The US administration earlier threatened to cut aid to UN members who would vote against its decision.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a release titled ‘Response of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Media Queries on the Resolution on the ‘Status of Jerusalem’ adopted at the tenth emergency special session of the UN General Assembly on 21 December 2017 said: "Sri Lanka voted in favour of the resolution titled ‘Status of Jerusalem’ submitted by Yemen and Turkey in their capacity as Chair of the Arab Group and Chair of the Summit of the Organisation of the Islamic Cooperation, respectively, at the tenth emergency special session of the UN General Assembly, on 21 December 2017.

"This vote in favour of the resolution was on the basis of Sri Lanka’s long held traditional and principled position, which is in keeping with the international understanding that Jerusalem is a final-status issue that must be resolved through negotiations between the two parties on the basis of the relevant United Nations resolutions, taking into account the legitimate concerns of both parties – Palestinians and Israelis, and that Jerusalem should be the shared capital of the Israeli and Palestinian States. The resolution adopted at the tenth emergency special session of the UN General Assembly on 21 December 2017 reaffirms this position, and Sri Lanka’s vote in favour of the resolution was not a vote against any member State of the United Nations.

"Sri Lanka stands by its position that it is only by realizing the vision of two states living side-by-side in peace, security and mutual recognition, with Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and Palestine, with all matters resolved permanently through

negotiations, that the legitimate aspirations of both parties and sustainable peace can be achieved.

"Therefore, Sri Lanka strongly believes that all parties concerned should work with restraint, and focus on creating conditions for direct and meaningful negotiations that can resolve all final status issues required for a negotiated settlement."

The ‘coconut crisis’ is a creation of the government

Namal-2
Though the government wants to show there is a massive coconut crisis in the country there is no such coconut crisis in the country and the proposal by the government to import coconut should be immediately withdrawn as importing coconuts is illegal and such a move would also bring various viruses and bacteria that would destroy the coconut plantations in the country says the convener of All Ceylon Farmers’ Federation Namal Karunaratna.

He pointed out that a ship of coconuts brought by Rajapaksa regime had to be dumped in the sea as bringing coconuts or any coconut kernel is illegal according to Plant Protection Act of Sri Lanka.
Mr. Karunaratna made these observations at a press conference held at Ganewatta area in Kurunegala. The press conference organized by the Coconut Planters & Industrialists Association to apprise the media regarding the downfall of the coconut industry and related issues was held at closed down factory that had produced coconut related products.

Speaking at the press conference attended by several organizations of coconut planters and coconut industrialists Mr. Karunaratna said, “ The normal annual coconut consumption in the country is about 2000 million coconuts. We export the rest of the crop. As such, it is not necessary to import coconuts.
There is no big difference in eh coconut harvest at present. What is necessary is to manage the distribution of eh coconuts that are available in the country.

However, the rulers, without doing what is necessary, are trying to destroy the whole coconut industry. The farm oil that is imported as an alternative to coconut oil has become a calamity to coconut industry. Importing farm oil is one reason for the breakdown of the coconut industry.

Importing coconuts is a disgrace to the country. The Joint Opposition has started getting a small backup due to this attempt by the government to import coconuts. However, we should remind that when Mr. Johnston Fernando was the minister of trade during Mahinda Rajapaksa regime a ship of coconut imported had to be dumped in the sea as it was not allowed in the country. It is people’s money that was dumped in the sea. During Rajapaksa regime Rs. 15150 million was wasted by importing rice.”

Train runs over car killing two, injuring two others









Friday, December 22, 2017
Two individuals were killed on the spot when a car crashed into a train plying from Halawata to Colombo
The injured were rushed to the Negombo Hospital.
Negombo Police is investigating.

Hearing cases daily by high courts is compulsory ; salaries of judges to be raised.


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 21.Dec.2017, 11.35PM)    Government has decided to ensure that cases in high courts are compulsorily heard daily , and also increase the salaries plus allowances of the judges. A number of decisions relating to the judiciary including the salary increases were proposed at the cabinet meeting held on 19th of December.

The proposal was   made by minister of justice  Ms. Thalatha Athukorale to the cabinet that  in order to find immediate solutions for delays experienced in high  courts which are militating against dispensation of justice duly,  it must be made  compulsory that  cases in high courts are heard daily . This will  apply in all instances except where there are special circumstances supported by valid reasons to put cases on hold.   The cabinet on the 19 th  approved the proposal of Thalatha to amend the criminal procedure code accordingly to implement the proposal. 

Upward revision of judges’ salaries…

At the same time cabinet gave the approval to table a proposal in  parliament  for  an upward revision of the salaries and allowances of the judges of the high courts , lower courts, officers of the AG’s department and Legal draftsman’s department with effect from 2018. Commensurate with  those increases , the salaries and allowances of the judges of the highest courts are also to be raised. 

Appointment of deputy Principal for  Law College

It was also decided at the cabinet meeting on the 19 th to create a post of deputy principal for Law College . The proposed amendment  regulations prepared  by   Legal education council  incorporated  in   the Gazette extraordinary 2047/27 of 2017-11-28 , was  tabled in parliament  for approval .
  


---------------------------
by     (2017-12-21 18:31:36)

Islandwide inflation increases to 8.4 pc


By Paneetha Ameresekere-2017-12-22

Islandwide inflation, as measured by the National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) increased to 8.4 per cent last month, faster than the more restricted Colombo Consumer Price Index (CCPI) which increased by a mere 7.6 per cent, an indication that islandwide inflation is far greater than Colombo centric inflation.

With 70 per cent of Sri Lanka's population living in rural areas, it is that segment of the population who are mostly affected by the rise in islandwide inflation......driven primarily by the sharp increases in coconut and rice prices due to the recent, prolonged drought which has affected three successive harvests recently, the last being this year's Yala season.

Meanwhile, the 12-month moving average of the NCPI also accelerated to 7.5 per cent last month, while the CCPI lagged behind at 6.4 per cent. One way of combating inflation is by increasing the interest rates and therewith the money circulation, in which instance, the people drawn by the greed to make deposits for higher returns, rather than continuing to be in circulation, will thereby drive up inflation by demand.

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) is set to announce their interest rate stance on 28 December. Currently, the CBSL's lending rate to banks is 8.75 per cent and its deposit rate is 7.25 per cent.

Brothel run under the guise of an Ayurvedic spa busted

 Friday, December 22, 2017
A brothel run under the guise of an Ayurvedic spa was raided by the Welikada Police last night.
The Police arrested six women, aged 31, 25, 23, 33, 26 and 32; from the areas of Thanamalwila, Dayagama, Bentota and Monaragala. The Manager, aged 42 was also arrested and charged with running the brothel.
The suspects will be produced before the Aluthkade Magistrate today.
Welikada Police is investigating further.

Rs. 25 mn worth narcotic pills seized at Kiribathgoda





2017-12-22
Nearly 7,800 narcotic pills worth some Rs.25 million were seized and two suspects aged 24 and 25 arrested at Kiribathgoda yesterday, Police Spokesman Ruwan Gunasekara said.
He said the raid was carried out on a tip off received by the Western Province Police Intelligence Unit.
Police said the narcotic pills were identified as “Ya Ba” or crazy pills, which contain a mixture of methamphetamine and caffeine and a single Ya Ba pill was known to be sold in the local market for Rs.3,000.
The suspects were handed over to the Peliyagoda Police and handed over to the Police Narcotic Bureau (PNB) for further investigations.

Two Palestinians killed in Gaza by Israeli fire in border clashes, says ministry


Ten Palestinians have been killed since Trump's 6 December announcement that he would recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital
Friday 22 December 2017 
Two Palestinians were killed as youths clashed with Israeli soldiers on the Gaza border on Friday in a new protest against US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the Palestinian health ministry said.
Zakaria al-Kafarneh, 24, who "died after being shot in the chest east of Jabalia in northern Gaza," a health ministry spokesman said in a statement.
The other was named as Mohammed Moheisen, 29, from Al-Shojaeya neighborhood.
The young man was shot with a live bullet during a confrontation with the Israeli army on the Gaza border.
Israeli soldiers shot Zakaria al-Kafarneh, 24, during an anti-Trump protest in Gaza on 22 December (MEE\Mohammed Asad)
Meanwhile, Palestinians reported at least 11 hurt in fresh clashes in the West Bank, including three who allegedly suffered wounds after being shot by rubber-tipped bullets.
Approximately 1,700 Palestinians took part in protests in the West Bank, throwing Molotov cocktails and rocks at Israeli security forces. Some 2,000 took part in protests along the Gaza border.
Ten Palestinians have been killed in violence since US President Donald Trump's 6 December announcement that he would recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital and move the US embassy there.
Eight of them have died in clashes, while two were killed in an Israeli air strike on Gaza.
Clashes occured in Bethlehem and other areas of the West Bank. This is the third straight Friday of violence following the US shift in policy regarding Jerusalem's status.
Three Palestinians were injured with rubber-coated bullets and 15 were treated for inhaling toxic gas fired by the Israeli soldiers. In Hebron, there was a confrontation between Israeli soldiers and Palestinians in Halhul village and Al-Arroub refugee camp.
Fourteen Palestinians were injured in Nablus with rubber-coated bullets, according to the Red Crescent. At Beit El settlement, north of Ramallah, confrontation with the Israeli army continued.
In Jerusalem, Palestinians marched after the Friday prayer in Al-Aqsa mosque towards Damascus Gate that leads to the Old City. But the march was halted by Israeli soldiers on the Al-Wad road in the Old City.

Is an intifada starting in US Congress?


An Israeli soldier detains a Palestinian youth during the first intifada.
 Patrick RobertCorbis

Jennifer Bing-21 December 2017

Last month members of Congress led by Minnesota’s Betty McCollum introduced House Bill 4391, the first in US history that calls for accountability and transparency for US aid to Israel.

Within a month of its introduction, 20 members of Congress have cosponsored a bill that focuses on Israeli violations of Palestinian children’s rights.

Thirty years ago, I witnessed an uprising in the occupied Palestinian territories. Today I feel I am witnessing one in the halls of Congress.

Three decades ago I worked as a volunteer teacher at a Quaker school in Ramallah. I remember that December in 1987 to be full of uncertainty – Israeli army raids, curfews, house arrests and street protests were part of our daily lives.

Each morning we didn’t know if the schools would be open or closed, whether our students were safe, if stores selling bread or markets selling produce would be open for business, or if a curfew would remain in force. We relied on a transistor radio and our neighbors for news, as this was an era before cell phones and the Internet.

Little did I realize that I was to witness a popular uprising, later to be named an “intifada” or shaking off, against what was at that point two decades of Israeli military rule.

Collective action

I remember how almost every member of Palestinian society participated in this first intifada – predominantly nonviolent resistance to Israeli soldiers occupying towns, villages and refugee camps throughout the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza.

While the iconic images of young Palestinians confronting heavily armed soldiers helped coin the phrase “the children of the stones,” the uprising I witnessed was more than a clash of rocks and Israeli army firepower.

Palestinians organized through popular committees to provide needed medical and food relief to communities targeted by curfews and military assaults.

Community health workers taught people how to bandage a wound, how to counter the effects of tear gas and how to set the broken bones of children who were victim to then Israeli Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s policy of “force, might and beatings.”

Women knit sweaters to send to prisoners filling Israeli detention camps, sewed flags to hold at protests and worked overtime in hospitals, clinics and human rights centers to document the daily assaults on Palestinian communities. Agricultural relief committees shared seedlings and encouraged people to plant “victory gardens” to help sustain long periods of army-imposed curfews.

Road signs were taken down to confuse military tanks and jeeps (in an era before GPS navigation) and roadblocks were made out of tires and stones to slow down the Israeli army arrest raids.

Teachers opened up their homes to continue classes despite school closures. One teacher I met used his kitchen as a science lab. Another had students study history together in her living room.
Palestinian collective action gave everyone a sense of hope.

An underground Unified National Leadership of the Uprising managed to write and distribute a daily leaflet that would magically appear on doorsteps each morning.

The leaflet would include instructions about curfews and which communities needed support, but also an ongoing account of what was happening throughout the occupied territories. This important daily communication built cohesion and a sense of joint purpose.

Hope in change

Despite the real suffering – and deaths – of so many people during the first intifada, I felt that the demands for self-determination and statehood, and international attention to the realities on the ground for Palestinians, would be realized.

I left my work in Ramallah to return to the United States where I knew it was important to share what I had witnessed during the first intifada.

I remember my first visit to a congressional office in 1989, where I was told that absolutely nothing can be done to stop unconditional support for Israel, despite countless media and human rights reports documenting widespread abuse against Palestinians.

In some encounters on Capitol Hill I was told “there are no Palestinians” and that the suffering I witnessed as a teacher was justified because “Israel needs to protect itself.”

Through my role at the American Friends Service Committee – a Quaker organization which began its work in Palestine in the refugee camps of Gaza in 1949 – I helped organize numerous visits of Palestinians and Israelis to meet members of Congress and their staff, but repeatedly was told, “We can do nothing due to domestic political considerations.”

Like many others in the movement for peace and justice, I had given up hope in change coming from our elected leaders. Instead, I worked with others to build greater understanding in communities across the United States.

We held events on college campuses and in houses of worship, using popular culture, traditional and nontraditional educational methods. We organized speaking tours, art exhibits, film festivals and book readings. We wrote letters to the editor and met editorial boards, spoke on radio shows and television newscasts and produced documentaries and billboard ads.

We organized delegations to the West Bank and Gaza Strip and more recently engaged in economic activism through boycott and divestment campaigns.

I witnessed the growth of our movement to include more organizations, faith communities and a broader cross section of US society responding to the Palestinian call to support their efforts for freedom, justice and equality.

Congressional allies

A few years ago, the American Friends Service Committee joined colleagues at Defense for Children International-Palestine – an independent child rights organization based in Ramallah – to explore the possibility of developing congressional allies to help change the uncritical support for Israeli military occupation.

In the context of failed peace processes and diplomatic overtures, escalating violence and continual expansion of settlement colonies, Palestinian children – who represent nearly half of the population in the West Bank – are subjected to widespread and systematic abuse, including torture and solitary confinement, in the Israeli military detention system.

To my surprise, on our advocacy visits on Capitol Hill, we found a few members of Congress who were open to hearing about and taking a public stand on the human rights of Palestinians.

Unlike three decades ago, members of Congress read with interest the human rights and media reports documenting the abuses of Palestinians by the Israeli authorities.

Instead of dismissing the experiences of those living under military rule, elected officials began to ask, “Why is this happening? How is this in Israel’s security interests?”

They began to question why two sets of laws exist in the same territory, with rights based on one’s ethnicity.

When presented with videos capturing the Israeli detention and arrest of Palestinian children, some as young as 12 years old, members of Congress asked, “Why am I not aware of this happening?” and “Is this being done with US taxpayers’ annual $3 billion in military aid?”

Momentum

In 2015, the first year of our grassroots educational and advocacy campaign “Israeli Military Detention: No Way to Treat a Child,” 19 members of Congress sent a letter to US Secretary of State John Kerry stating their concern for the abuses of Palestinian children’s rights.

A year later, 20 members wrote a second “Dear Colleague” letter asking President Barack Obama to appoint a special envoy to hold Israeli and Palestinian leaders accountable to their obligations under universal human rights norms.

Each year of our campaign, the concern for human rights and calls for accountability for US assistance to Israel have grown.

Last month in the days leading up to the introduction of H.R. 4391 – the Promoting Human Rights by Ending Israeli Military Detention of Palestinian Children Act – we watched the extensive networks of US-based activists call on their elected officials to publicly speak out for the rights of Palestinians.

In the first week, 10 members of Congress signed onto the bill that requires the secretary of state to certify annually that no funds obligated or expended in the previous year by the United States for assistance to Israel have been used to support the ill-treatment of Palestinian children detained by Israeli forces from the occupied West Bank.

A month later the number of cosponsors has doubled.

Perhaps it is too soon to say that an uprising on Palestinian human rights is taking place in Washington. But for certain, we are beginning to shake off the silence that typically existed when calls for accountability were asked of members of Congress.

In 2018, we will continue to mobilize for a change in US policies, continue to document and share the experience of Palestinians and their Israeli supporters who work to end decades of military rule and injustice. We will continue to be inspired by the creativity and resilience of those who “shake” the powers maintaining an untenable status quo.

Jennifer Bing is director of the Palestine-Israel program for the American Friends Service Committee in Chicago and co-leader of the No Way to Treat a Child campaign.

Arab states believe U.S. aid secure despite defying Trump Jerusalem move

Members of the United Nations Security Council vote on an Egyptian-drafted resolution regarding recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem, during a meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including Palestine, at U.N. Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., December 18, 2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Suleiman Al-KhalidiJohn Davison-DECEMBER 22, 2017

AMMAN/CAIRO (Reuters) - Leading Arab allies threatened with cuts in aid by Donald Trump said on Friday they had no choice but to defy the U.S. president over his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and did not believe he would follow through.

More than 120 countries, including every Arab nation, voted at the U.N. General Assembly late on Thursday to urge the United States to withdraw its decision, announced earlier this month.

Trump threatened to cut off financial aid to countries that voted in favour of the U.N. resolution, drafted by Egypt and supported by all members of the U.N. Security Council except Washington.

He repeated his threat on Friday, writing on Twitter: “After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!”

In Egypt and Jordan, among the top recipients of U.S. aid but long the most heavily invested in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Trump’s threats were not taken seriously enough to backtrack on firm opposition to the U.S. move.

“The Americans know more than any one else that a stable Jordan is crucial for U.S. interests in the region,” a government minister who asked not to be named said.

For its cooperation in defence and other fields, Jordan receives some $1.2 billion annually from Washington.

“We do not expect the American administration to touch assistance but if it does this will only add to Jordan’s economic woes,” the minister said.

UNPREDICTABILITY

He repeated his threat on Friday, writing on Twitter: “After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!”

In Egypt and Jordan, among the top recipients of U.S. aid but long the most heavily invested in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Trump’s threats were not taken seriously enough to backtrack on firm opposition to the U.S. move.

“The Americans know more than any one else that a stable Jordan is crucial for U.S. interests in the region,” a government minister who asked not to be named said.

For its cooperation in defence and other fields, Jordan receives some $1.2 billion annually from Washington.

“We do not expect the American administration to touch assistance but if it does this will only add to Jordan’s economic woes,” the minister said.

UNPREDICTABILITY