Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, December 11, 2017

Investments in listed securities and best practices to follow; practical guidance from a compliance



logoTuesday, 12 December 2017 

Investment in financial instruments has never been easier than today. With the sphere of new technology, an investor is able to invest not only in his or her own jurisdiction but also in other countries’ financial markets. The capital market is an attractive investment arena for many long-term and short-term investors regardless of the risk involved in listed securities. This is no different to the Sri Lankan context where investors invest through the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE), the only stock exchange in the country. The capital market in Sri Lanka is regulated by the Securities & Exchange Commission of Sri Lanka (SEC) and its participants and activities are also subject to the rules of the CSE.

Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya Charged With Corruption



December 11 2017 

Activist Nagananda Kodituwakku today charged Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya before the Supreme Court for abuse of office of the AG to confer a favour to the Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to suspend the Provincial Elections completely disregarding the Supreme Court determination on the 20th Amendment to the Constitution where the Court has ruled that the suspension of elections was illegal and cannot be done without obtaining a mandate from the people, who enjoy absolute power, the sovereignty over all organs of the government under the Republican Constitution.

Jayantha Jayasuriya -Attorney General

In the action filed (SC/Writs/5/2017) Kodituwakku has also charged all three Commissioners of the Corruption Commission and its Director General for their dismal failure to act as required by law and to initiate a credible investigation into the complaint he had made against Jayasuriya for abuse of office.

He drew the attention of the Court to a letter dated 20th Sep 2017 sent to the Speaker by the AG (a copy of the letter was produced in Court by the Activist) which states as follows:

“… I have to advice you that in terms of the Standing Orders of Parliament, an amendment to a Bill could be introduced at the Committee Stage and the authority that can determine its admissibility is the Hon’ Speaker..”.
 
Quoting a paragraph from Erskine May on Parliamentary Practice (24th Edition) Jayasuriya further informs the Speaker as follows:

“… Erskine May on Parliamentary Practice [24th Edition] at page 547 states ‘… As in other matters of order, admissibility of an amendment can ultimately be decided only by the House itself, there being no authority which can in advice rule an amendment out of order…'”

The activist Nagananda producing the relevant page (page 547) from the said book before the Court states that the above statement made by Jayasuriya is absolutely false und unfounded and there is no such reference in the said page quoted by the AG Jayasuriya where the AG had effectively challenges the authority of the Supreme Court.

Activist states that AG Jayasuriya who vigorously defended the failed 20th Amendment Bill to the Constitution at the Special Determination hearing on the 08th of September 2017, deliberately ignored the Supreme Court ruling on the said 20th Amendment Bill and provided manifestly false advice to the 9th Respondent to pass the Bill titled ‘Provincial Council Elections (Amendment) Bill’ by fraudulent means. He states further that the said act by the AG amounts to betrayal of the trust placed in the office of the Attorney General by the people and that by doing so he had deliberately abused the office of the AG to confer favours to the Prime Minister Wickramasinghe to postpone the Provincial Council elections by fraudulent means.

Quoting from the Constitution [Article 77(2)] Kodituwakku further states that the AG is not at all authorized to express any opinion where a Bill requires approval by the people at a referendum and the power of which is vested only in the Supreme Court. However, the AG has abused the office to provide a false advise the Speaker to pass the Bill with a Special Majority whereas approval of the people at a referendum was required to enact the said Bill.

Read More

Success at local polls remains one priority for Sirisena

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe speaking at a ceremony held at the Parliament complex yesterday to mark the launching of the Hambantota Port project in association with a Chinese company. Pic by Indika Handuwela


  • President speaks to Basil in last-ditch effort for reconciliation between SLFP and JO before nominations, but major issues prevail

  • Confident UNP finalises candidates list; Hambantota port project launched and new moves to  reduce prices of rice and coconut
One evening early this week, Basil Rajapaksa, a key player in the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), was en route to his home in Battaramulla after attending a meeting in Dehiwala. He had reached the Kohuwala junction when his mobile phone rang.As an aide explained, he was in his Land Cruiser with others including a media person. He was reluctant to answer. When it rang non-stop, he responded though he was not sure who the caller was.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, said on Monday: “We condemn all kinds of antisemitism and xenophobia, and no disagreements, not even over the status of Jerusalem, justify such actions.”
US diplomats have continued to try to contain the damage caused by Trump’s decision, which upended years of US diplomacy and the international legal consensus.

Asked in a telephone briefing with Gulf-based journalists about whether the president would change his mind, David Satterfield, the assistant secretary for the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, said no. He stressed, however, that the developments of the past week did not prejudge the issue of final borders.

“The president’s decision stands,” Satterfield said. “It is, as I said, what the president believes was the right step, at the right moment. The president also said that these measures in no way prejudice the outcome of final status negotiation between Israel and the Palestinians.”
Additional reporting by Kate Connolly in Berlin

Explosion rocks New York commuter hub, suspect in custody

Akayed Ullah, a Bangladeshi man who attempted to detonate a homemade bomb strapped to his body at a New York commuter hub during morning rush hour is seen in this handout photo received December 11, 2017. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission/Handout via REUTERS

Nick ZieminskiDaniel Trotta-DECEMBER 11, 2017

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Bangladeshi man with a homemade bomb strapped to his body set off an explosion at a New York commuter hub during rush hour on Monday, wounding himself and three others in what New York Mayor Bill de Blasio called an attempted terrorist attack.

The suspect in the incident at the Port Authority Bus Terminal, a block from Times Square, was identified as Akayed Ullah, the New York Police Department commissioner said. The suspect had burns and lacerations while three other people, including a police officer, sustained minor injuries.

Ullah is from the Bangladeshi city of Chittagong and is a U.S. resident, said the country’s police chief. He had no criminal record there and last visited Bangladesh on Sept. 8, the chief said.
SPONSORED

Ullah had a black cab/limousine driver’s license from 2012 to 2015, after which it expired, the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission said.

The weapon was based on a pipe bomb and attached to the suspect, police said. New York state Governor Andrew Cuomo, speaking at a news conference near the site, described the device as “amateur-level.”

De Blasio told the same news conference that the incident, which happened at the start of the city’s rush hour, was “an attempted terrorist attack.”

“As New Yorkers our lives revolve around the subways. When we hear of an attack in the subways, it is incredibly unsettling,” de Blasio said.

New York City was a target, said John Miller, deputy police commissioner of intelligence and counterterrorism.

Miller cited the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that killed more than 2,750 people in New York and nearly 3,000 people total; and the World Trade Center bombing of February 26, 1993, which killed six people.

“When you hear about a bomb in the subway station, which is in many ways one of our worst nightmares, the reality turns out better than the initial expectation and fear,” Cuomo told reporters. Later on CNN, he said the attacker apparently used the internet to obtain information on how to make a bomb.

The incident was captured on security video, police said. Video posted on NYPost.com showed smoke and a man lying in the tunnel that connects sections of the Times Square subway station and the bus station. A photograph showed a man lying facedown, with tattered clothes and burns on his torso.

”There was a stampede up the stairs to get out,“ said one commuter, Diego Fernandez. ”Everybody was scared and running and shouting.”

Alicja Wlodkowski, a Pennsylvania resident in New York for the day, was sitting in a restaurant in the bus terminal.

“Suddenly, I saw a group of people, like six people, running like nuts. A woman fell. No one even went to stop and help her because the panic was so scary.”

The bus terminal was temporarily shut down and a large swath of midtown Manhattan was closed to traffic. Subway train service returned to normal after earlier disruptions.

WABC reported the suspect was in his 20s and that he has been in the United States for seven years and has an address in New York’s Brooklyn borough. Police shut down the entire block and there was a heavy police presence outside the home.

First reports of the incident began soon after 7 a.m. (1200 GMT). New York in December sees a surge of visitors who come to see elaborate store displays, the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree and Broadway shows.

The bus terminal is the busiest in the United States, according to the Port Authority. On a typical weekday, about 220,000 passengers arrive or depart on more than 7,000 buses.

More than 200,000 people use the Times Square station, the city’s busiest, each weekday, according to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

The bus terminal is connected to different sections of the sprawling Times Square subway station - which serves 10 train lines - through a long, narrow below-ground tunnel that carries thousands of commuters during rush hour. Buskers and other entertainers at entrances to the tunnel often draw crowds.

The incident rippled through American financial markets, briefly weakening stock markets as they were starting trading for the week and giving a modest lift to safe-haven assets such as U.S. Treasuries.

S&P 500 index emini futures ESv1 dipped in the moments after the initial reports of an explosion, but major stock indexes later opened slightly higher.

On the West Coast, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation authority asked law enforcement for heightened security along bus and rail lines as a precaution.

The incident occurred less than two months after an Uzbek immigrant killed eight people by speeding a rental truck down a New York City bike path, in an attack for which Islamic State claimed responsibility.

In September 2016, a man injured 31 people when he set off a homemade bomb in New York’s Chelsea district.

Trump-Russia probe: Mueller 'demands Deutsche Bank data'

Robert Mueller testifies during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington DC, 19 June 2013
Robert Mueller is investigating alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russia

BBC5 December 2017

US special counsel Robert Mueller has ordered Germany's Deutsche Bank to provide records of accounts held by Donald Trump, according to reports.

Mr Mueller issued a subpoena to the bank several weeks ago demanding the transaction data, Reuters news agency and a German newspaper say.

He is investigating alleged collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
However, a lawyer for the US president denied the reports.

"We have confirmed that the news reports that the special counsel had subpoenaed financial records relating to the president are false," attorney Jay Sekulow told Reuters in a statement.

"No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources."

US investigators are said to be demanding information on dealings linked to Mr Trump as part of an investigation into alleged Russian influence in the US presidential election, according to Handelsblatt and Reuters.

Deutsche Bank, one of the Trump Organization's major lenders on its real estate projects, said it would not comment on any of its individual clients.

However in a statement to NBC News, it said: "[Our bank] takes its legal obligations seriously and remains committed to co-operating with authorised investigations into this matter."

In June, Germany's largest bank rejected requests for account records by Democrats in the US House of Representatives to provide details of the president's finances, citing privacy laws.

Mueller paves way for possible showdown

US President Donald Trump on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington DC, 4 December 2017Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES

Analysis by Anthony Zurcher, BBC News North America Reporter

Until now, Robert Mueller has appeared to be operating on the periphery of President Trump - focusing on former campaign chairman Paul Manafort's previous foreign lobbying efforts, the Russian contacts of George Papadopoulos, a relatively minor foreign policy adviser, and the post-election actions of Mr Trump's confidant Michael Flynn.

While the charges are serious, the president himself has been removed from the most heated prosecutorial action.

That all changes if the Deutsche Bank reports are true. The German institution, which also has ties to Russian oligarchs, was a lifeline for the Trump Organization's businesses in the early 2000s, when US lenders turned their backs on the then-struggling business tycoon.

How closely did Mr Trump and his associates follow the letter of the law at a time before he was a serious political candidate?

The president's defenders will argue that his past business dealings are not relevant to the special counsel inquiry, tasked with probing possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

A high-stakes showdown over whether Mr Mueller is exceeding his mandate could be brewing.

What power does Mueller have?

As special counsel Mr Mueller, who headed the FBI for more than a decade, has the powers to subpoena records and bring criminal charges.

He can also prosecute anyone who interferes in his investigation through crimes including perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence and intimidation of witnesses.

Mr Mueller's office has so far spent about $3.2m (£2.4m) on attorneys, special agents and other expenses as part of its investigation, the US Department of Justice revealed in a report on Tuesday.
US intelligence agencies have concluded that Moscow tried to sway the presidential election in favour of Mr Trump.

It is alleged that Russian hackers stole information linked to the campaign of his rival Hillary Clinton and passed it to Wikileaks so it could be released to undermine her.

Mr Trump has repeatedly denied any collusion with Russia, calling the allegations a "witch hunt".

Who has been charged?

Four people have so far been charged by Mr Mueller over alleged links between Moscow and the Trump team.
  • October 2017: Mr Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his business associate Rick Gates are charged with 12 counts of money laundering, undisclosed foreign lobbying, and lying to government investigators over alleged links to pro-Russian groups in Ukraine (both deny the charges)
  • October 2017: It emerges that George Papadopoulos has pleaded guilty to lying to FBI investigators about his contacts with Russian nationals and connected individuals while he was serving as a foreign policy advisor with the Trump campaign
  • December 2017: Michael Flynn, the former general who was briefly Mr Trump's national security adviser, pleads guilty to making "false, fictitious and fraudulent statements" to the FBI about his contact with a Russian official.
Read more: Who's who in the drama to end all dramas?

America Is Heading for an Unprecedented Constitutional Crisis

The Republican Party is ready to serve as an accomplice to obstruction of justice.

U.S. President Donald Trump in a meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan at the White House on June 6. (Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.
BY -
 

White House lawyer Ty Cobb has been attempting to keep the First Client in check by telling him that Robert Mueller’s investigation will soon be over and result in his exoneration. Back in August, Cobb was confident that it would all be over by Thanksgiving. When that didn’t happen, Cobb, like a millenarian cultist adjusting the date of doomsday, claimed that it would end by Christmas. Now Christmas is almost upon us, and no light is visible at the end of the tunnel. Far from it. The investigation, which has already resulted in two indictments and two guilty pleas of Trump advisors, appears to be accelerating and drawing ever closer to the Oval Office.

What will Trump’s reaction be when he figures out he’s been duped — and that the Mueller probe, far from a “nothing burger,” is a carafe of strychnine that poses an existential threat to his presidency? The likely result is that Trump will either pardon everyone involved or try to fire the special counsel, or both. And then the nation will be plunged into a constitutional crisis the likes of which we have not seen since Watergate.

The storm is not yet upon us, but the dark clouds are already visible on the horizon. Ever since the guilty plea from former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn on Dec. 1, Trump and his enablers have been throwing a hissy-fit at the FBI, the “Justice” Department (the sarcastic quote marks are the president’s own), and the special counsel’s office by seizing on “evidence” that all three are biased against him.

Mueller inadvertently fanned the flames by quietly relieving a senior FBI agent, Peter Strzok, for sending disparaging texts about Trump to an FBI lawyer with whom he was romantically entangled. You would think that this would be evidence of Mueller’s determination to avoid any taint of bias, even though FBI agents, like other federal employees, are allowed to express political views without fear of retribution. But no. Trump has cynically twisted Mueller’s action to suggest that the removal of an anti-Trump agent is somehow evidence of … anti-Trump bias. Strzok, a widely respected special agent, has now been elevated by the far-right media machine into an archfiend who unfairly exonerated Hillary Clinton and framed Trump.

Trump & Co. are also in a froth about another Mueller subordinate, attorney Andrew Weissmann. His crimes? He apparently attended Hillary Clinton’s election night party and sent an email to acting Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates saying he was “proud” of her for refusing to enforce Trump’s initial ban on Muslim visitors to the United States — the very ban that was subsequently deemed unconstitutional by numerous courts and totally rewritten by the administration in order to pass legal muster.

About the Author
Max Boot is the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick senior fellow for national security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. His forthcoming book is “The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam.”

Add these attacks to all the other innuendos and smears emanating from the Trump camp. There is the claim that Mueller is biased because he is friends with fired FBI Director James Comey, who is anti-Trump even though Comey did as much as anyone to elect Trump. That members of Mueller’s staff have made campaign donations to Democrats. That the FBI erred in showing interest in the dossier on Kremlin-Trump links compiled by a respected former MI6 officer. That FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s wife received money from Hillary Clinton (in fact, she received campaign funds from the Democratic Party of Virginia and a political action committee associated with Virginia’s Democratic governor when she ran for a state Senate seat in 2015).

Based on such flimsy reasoning, Trump besmirches not just Mueller’s team but the whole FBI, tweeting: “After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters – worst in History!” At his Pensacola rally on Friday, held to promote the Senate candidacy of an accused child molester, Trump decried the entire American government for being biased against him: “This is a rigged system,” he said. “This is a sick system from the inside. And you know there’s no country like our country but we have a lot of sickness in some of our institutions.” It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out which “institutions” he is talking about.

Naturally, the most fervent Trumpkins have gone even farther than Trump himself; in fact, they are said to be frustrated by the “restraint” he has shown in his war against Mueller. Listen to what the talking heads at state TV, aka Fox News, are saying. Sean Hannity calls Mueller “a disgrace to the American justice system” and “the head of the snake.” Jeanine Piro, sounding very much like a budding commissar, claims: “There is a cleansing needed in the FBI and the Department of Justice. It needs to be cleansed of individuals who should not just be fired, but who need to be taken out in handcuffs.” Greg Jarrett compares the FBI to the KGB, as if the G-men were running gulags in Alaska: “I think we now know that the Mueller investigation is illegitimate and corrupt,” he says . “And Mueller has been using the FBI as a political weapon. And the FBI has become America’s secret police. Secret surveillance, wiretapping, intimidation, harassment and threats. It’s like the old KGB that comes for you in the dark of the night banging through your door.”

And, right after the commercial break, the Fox hosts will excoriate Democrats and NFL players for being “anti-police” and glorify Trump for championing “law enforcement.” In fact, to judge by his public pronouncements, Trump is only in favor of enforcing the law against black and brown people. If it’s a matter of saving his own skin, he and his partisans will gleefully burn the nation’s premier law enforcement agency to the ground.

It doesn’t matter to them that Robert Mueller is a decorated combat Marine, professional prosecutor, and — ahem — Republican who has been universally revered for his probity. No less an authority than Newt Gingrich said on May 17: “Robert Mueller is superb choice to be special counsel. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity.” But now that Mueller is closing in on Trump, Gingrich scoffs, “How can you seriously say this guy [Mueller] is neutral?” and claims: “At the very top, the Justice Department and the FBI became corrupted.”

If you take seriously such accusations, you would have to conclude that only Republicans are allowed to investigate a Republican president — and not just ordinary, apolitical Republicans like Mueller but very partisan Republicans. Does that mean, therefore, that only Democrats can investigate Democratic presidents? Hardly! After all, most of Trump’s defenders were also defenders of Kenneth W. Starr, an active Republican who was appointed to probe Bill Clinton in 1994 after an earlier independent prosecutor, Republican Robert B. Fiske Jr., was judged to be insufficiently zealous. So apparently the rule is that Democrats are simply not allowed to be prosecutors. Or only Democratic presidents should be investigated. Or something.

The Trump cheering section cannot fathom the possibility that FBI agents and prosecutors might be able to separate their political views from their actions — that just because Peter Strzok might be critical of Trump or Andrew Weissmann a Clinton supporter, they nonetheless take seriously their oaths to enforce the law without fear or favor. Trump has made plain that he would love to use the justice system to exact vengeance on political foes such as “Crooked Hillary,” and he can’t fathom the possibility that anyone else in a position of power might act differently. As with so many of Trump’s hyperbolic criticisms, his vilification of the Justice Department, the FBI, and the special counsel’s office for carrying out a political vendetta represents yet another case of projection.

But given how unfounded and outrageous the attacks are, it is striking and dismaying how few Republicans are rushing to defend Mueller and his team. That is an ominous sign of what will happen if and when Trump tries to fire the special counsel. The GOP has made clear that it is committed not to the rule of law but to the rule of Trump.

The contemptible conduct of Trump’s overzealous supporters is well summarized by one of our most eminent political pundits, who said: “There is something profoundly demeaning and destructive to have the White House systematically undermine an officer of the Justice Department. And when I watch these paid hacks on television, to be quite honest, I am sickened by how unpatriotically they undermine the Constitution of the United States on behalf of their client.”

That was Newt Gingrich speaking in 1998 about attacks on Ken Starr. (Hat tip to Jack Pitney for the quote.) Gingrich’s criticisms apply with equal force today — to himself and to the other Trump defenders who are aiding and abetting the president’s attempts to obstruct justice.

Gaddafi's toxic legacy: Abandoned chemical plant poisoning Libyans


Abu Kammash was run into the ground before being abandoned by the state in 2010. Locals say its legacy is poison, disease and suffering
Razor-wire fences surround the abandoned GCCI at Abu Kammash (MEE/Karlos Zurutuza)


Karlos Zurutuza's picture
Karlos Zurutuza-Monday 11 December 2017

ZUWARA, Libya - A dusty gas mask left at the perimeter guard post hints at what lies beyond. Amid mounds of rubbish, broken furniture and loops of razor wire, abandoned chemical silos, factories and office blocks jut from the desolate scrub.
Ibrahim recalls the day almost 40 years ago when this place, Abu Kammash on Libya's western coastline, offered overseas adventure and a well-paid career. He was one of many Libyans sent in the late 1970s to study in Europe, and then work at this huge petrochemical complex known as GCCI.
The Germans followed strict protocols on toxic waste. In Libyan hands, there were two options: bury it, or dump it in the sea
- Ibrahim, former GCCI worker
"How could I possibly say no to such an offer?" he asks. A generation on, Ibrahim says it was the worst decision of his life, which has cost him and the family he raised under its shadow in Zuwara.
Abu Kammash, known locally as Bukamesh, was abandoned in 2010 after years of mismanagement by Gaddafi's Libya, leaving sea and soil polluted, the ocean's natural bounty poisoned and, locals say, many who lived nearby ill and even dead. 
And due to ongoing war and instability, and the lack of expertise to decommission the site, next to nothing has been done to contain the aftermath. Poisons such as mercury and cadmium continue to leech into the environment and, as decay sets in, locals say the effects are worsening.
A hazard warning on the perimeter fence at Abu Kammash, from a video taken shortly after the site was closed (screengrab)

A slow death sentence

For more than 30 years, Abu Kammash produced millions of tonnes of salt, plastics and industrial chemicals. Its first 15 years were managed by German experts, Ibrahim said, before it was taken over by Libya's government in 1996.
"That was the beginning of the end," says Ibrahim. "The Germans followed strict protocols to treat toxic waste. As soon as the plant fell into Libyan hands, there were two options: bury it nearby, or dump it in the sea."
From that point, Ibrahim said, workers were condemned to a slow death sentence.
The biggest issue was the use of mercury, a highly toxic heavy metal used in electrolysis to create industrial chemicals such as chlorine and sodium hydroxide. Despite a global effort at the turn of the century to ban its use, after disasters in Canada and Japan, Abu Kammash under Gaddafi changed none of its processes.
"Changing the whole system would have been too costly," says Ibrahim. Workers had blood tests taken every six months, showing dangerous and even potentially fatal levels of mercury, but the tests, he said, were "merely a formality", and the results were ignored.
Fahed Garab, the head of surgery at Zuwara hospital and an A&E doctor in Abu Kammash between 2008 and 2009, said there are simply "no medical statistics of any kind" on the effects of the pollution.
However, Garab said safety conditions at the plant were "very bad", and official studies showed one in 10 villagers in nearby Bukamesh had high levels of mercury in their bodies. 
"The percentage increased among staff at the electrolysis plant, where half showed elevated levels of mercury," he said.
Staff at the electrolysis plant... half showed elevated levels of mercury
- Fahed Garab, Zuwara head surgeon 
Ibrahim says many of these workers fell seriously ill or died.
"Even after closure, a Tunisian laboratory was diagnosing former electrolysis workers with high levels of mercury poisoning. It's a miracle they are still alive."
But the poison did not stop at the factory gates, nor at the village nearby. Ibrahim is convinced it has sickened people in Zuwara, 10 miles along the coast.
In 2014, Ibrahim's 19-year-old daughter Sara was diagnosed by the Red Crescent with Friedreich's ataxia, a debilitating disease associated with mercury poisoning that causes progressive damage to the nervous system.
Motor coordination is one of the first signs, and victims often end their lives in a wheelchair.
Scrubland at site of the GCCI. Mercury, cadmium and other toxic elements have been found in the soil (MEE/Karlos Zurutuza)

Ground zero

In Zuwara, environmental volunteers are trying to get to grips with the disaster that is Abu Kammash, but the site is too dangerous to tackle alone.
Sadiq Jiash, the head of the town's emergency committee, recalls how the site stood abandoned for a year before anyone could gain access. In 2011, after Gaddafi lost control of the Tunisian border area during the Libyan uprising, he was one of the first to enter.
When we finally got inside we could hardly believe what we saw
- Sadiq Jiash, Zuwara emergency committee
"When we finally got inside we could hardly believe what we saw," said Jiash. Nothing inside had been closed down, and years of neglect had contributed to myriad leaks of ethylene, hydrochloric acid and other toxic substances from pipes and tanks.
"Any attempt to close anything down could have caused an explosion, and we dared not touch anything," he said.
In the Zuwara offices of Bado, an environmental group, photos line the walls of work by volunteers at Farwa.
Farwa was Libya's only island before it was artificially connected to the mainland in the early 2000s as part of project by Gaddafi's second son, Saadi, to build a coastal metropolis and an international investment zone.
Saadi Gaddafi's plans for a 'duty free zone' added to pollution around GCCI (AFP)
Bado's president, Shokri Dahe, says that has compounded the effects of Abu Kammash's pollution.
Waters became increasingly polluted because of the reclamation project, says Dahe. In 2013, Bado sent samples of grass, earth and water from Farwa to a laboratory in Tunisia for analysis.
"The pollution levels were so brutal that they had to repeat the tests twice to make sure they were not wrong."
The presence of toxic waste in the surrounding area was corroborated by a 2015 joint study by the University of Sabratha and several Malaysian institutions.
It found heavy metals such as mercury, copper, lead and cadmium on nearby farms, all of which, if ingested in unsafe amounts, can be linked to cancer in humans.
The report said that while the concentrations were low, there was concern of transmission to humans via the food chain - the area is home to olive groves where fruit is pressed for oil.
In a 2016 investigation on Farwa island, mercury levels far in excess of international safety levels were found in a vast array of ocean life. 
Many samples contained several times the maximum safe levels agreed by UN health authorities.
The fish, still being caught by locals, are now filled with poison.
Broken and abandoned equipment inside the GCCI (MEE/Karlos Zurutuza)

Years of work ahead

Such levels of pollution, and the effects, will take years to conquer. The task is compounded by the lack of any central authority in Libya, where three governments vie for power and use a patchwork of militias for fight their battles.
Adel Ashur Banana, an environmental engineer who joint authored the 2015 and 2016 investigations, has nevertheless started his own mission to get the site cleaned up. It is small, and poorly financed, but it is a start.
Once we have stored the chemicals, the next step will be to clean the farms and Farwa
- Adel Ashur Banana, environmental engineer
"So far we've removed some highly corrosive chemical elements and stored them in Zuwara but we rely on the little money we get from people who deal with scrap to keep working," Adel said in a telephone interview.
"Once we have stored the chemicals, the next step will be to clean the farms and the beautiful island of Farwa."
The latter will likely be a much bigger challenge. Banana and his team have recently found out that even the seaweeds contain high levels of lead.
An unknown substance seeps out of abandoned barrels in a video taken shortly after the GCCI was closed in 2010. There has been little cleaning work since (screengrab)
Zuwara's mayor, Hafed Bensasi, says a joint delegation from Zuwara alongside members of the industry ministry in Tripoli have discussed a comprehensive clean-up programme with an Italian firm, but provided no further details.
"We want to dismantle the plant and clean up the environment," he said. "We want to make sure that there are guarantees that a disaster like this does not happen again," the mayor says.
He admitted no agreement had been struck and seven years on from its abandonment, Abu Kammash remains a sore on Libya's landscape.
For Ibrahim, the task is just too big to manage.
"There are thousands of tonnes of contaminated soil and it will take tonnes of money to get rid of it," he says.
And his family has more immediate problems to deal with.
"I just need someone to treat my daughter, that's all I'm asking for today."

Saudi Princess Ameera Aidan fights sex exploitation



By Dr. Lanka Siriwardene--2017-12-10

The reporter from the Forbes Magazine told Ameera Aidan that she has taken a prominent place in her country's women's rights issues and that she was making a noise that women should be allowed to drive vehicles, and what was the reason for it? Princess Ameera despite being an Arab woman was well dressed in European attire and she replied: "This shows that women, too, have to be given their rights and allowed to practice it in public.

For an ordinary woman to keep a driver she has to incur 30 per cent from her income. Then there are reasons, such as security and privacy. In Saudi banks 70 per cent of accounts are owned by women. Today the womenfolk in Arabia have gained knowledge in spheres such as medicine, teaching and law. In the university sector, 57 per cent who study are women. But, there are many obstacles that have been placed in their path which had prevented them from benefitting through their skills. Saudi Arabia is one of the few countries in the world where women have not been authorized to drive motor vehicles. There is also no hindrance either legally or by religion for them to do so. It is these extreme negative policies that have prevented our women from achieving their potential."

Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest nations in western Asia. Its total population is 31 million, while it is also the heartland of the Muslim world.

Saudi Arabia is also noted for its extremely cruel acts of punishments being meted out such as beheading in public, severing arms and limbs and stoning to death.

The Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia is King Salman bin Abdullaiz al – Sud, while the Saudi Royal family is noted for implementing a Sunni-style of leadership.

Though around 21 million are noted for using the internet the websites, they are allowed to function under strict laws. In Saudi Arabia Twitter usage is 40 per cent.

The television medium is controlled entirely by the Government while there is no scope for the operation of private television stations.

All newspapers are censored by the Royal Family.

Princess Ameera bin Aidan bin Nayef Al –Taweel was born on 6 November 1983 in Riyadh.
As her parents got divorced when she was young, the Princess was looked after by the relatives of her mother.

She is also a degree holder of University of New Haven, Connecticut, on Business Management. Based on the Middle East CEO list, she was the most powerful woman in the world in 2012.

She was also feted as the Most Powerful Woman with a personality by the Middle East Excellence Award.

Recently, the Saudi Princess made a controversial remark to the Le Monde French Magazine related to her royal family.

She had stated that the family had turned the city of Jeddah into a slave market. She claimed that having bought underage children from overseas they were being exploited sexually.

She charged this transaction had taken place with countries such as Bangladesh, the Philippines, Nigeria, Somalia, Romania and Bulgaria.

The Saudi Princess also had mentioned Sri Lanka also as one of the countries involved in this sordid exercise. She had stated that many expat women who serve in Saudi are also sexually exploited.

Rise of Populists and Failure of Anti-fascist Movement


We need to cut off the working class oxygen supply to the alt-right by addressing their voters

by Slavoj Zizek- 
( December 10, 2017, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) Marx’s formula of religion as the opium of the people needs some serious rethinking today. It is true that radical Islam is an exemplary case of religion as the opium of the people: a false confrontation with capitalist modernity which allows some fundamentalist Muslims to dwell in their ideological dream while their countries are ravaged by the effects of global capitalism   – and exactly the same holds for Christian fundamentalism. However, there are today, in our Western world, two other versions of the opium of the people: the opium and the people.
As Laurent de Sutter demonstrated, chemistry (in its scientific version) is becoming part of us: large aspects of our lives are characterised by the management of our emotions by drugs, from everyday use of sleeping pills and antidepressants to hard narcotics. We are not just controlled by impenetrable social powers; our very emotions are “outsourced” to chemical stimulation.
The stakes of this chemical intervention are double and contradictory: we use drugs to keep external excitement (shocks, anxieties and so on) under control, i.e., to desensitise us for them, and to generate artificial excitement if we are depressed and lack desire.
As the rise of populism demonstrates, the opium of the people is “the people” itself, the fuzzy populist dream destined to obfuscate our own antagonisms. However, I want to add to this series: anti-fascism itself.
The fear not to make any compromises with the alt-right can muddy the degree to which we are already compromised by it. One should greet every sign of this self-critical reflection which is gradually emerging and which, while remaining thoroughly anti-fascist, casts also a critical glance on the weaknesses of the liberal left.

A new spectre is haunting progressive politics in Europe and the US, the spectre of fascism. Trump in the US, le Pen in France, Orban in Hungary – they are all demonised as the new evil towards which we should unite all our force. Every minimal doubt and reserve is immediately proclaimed a sign of secret collaboration with fascism.
In a remarkable interview for Der Spiegel published in October 2017, Emmanuel Macron made some statements received enthusiastically by all who want to fight the new fascist right: “There are three possible ways to react to right-wing extremist parties. The first is to act as though they don’t exist and to no longer risk taking political initiatives that could get these parties against you. That has happened many times in France and we have seen that it doesn’t work. The people who you are actually hoping to support no longer see themselves reflected in your party’s speeches. And it allows the right wing to build its audience.
“The second reaction is to chase after these right-wing extremist parties in fascination… and the third possibility is to say, these people are my true enemies and to engage them in battle. Exactly that is the story of the second round of the presidential election in France.”
While Macron’s stance is commendable, it is crucial to supplement it by a self-critical turn. The demonised image of a fascist threat clearly serves as a new political fetish, fetish in the simple Freudian sense of a fascinating image whose function is to obfuscate the true antagonism.
Fascism itself is immanently fetishist: it needs a figure like that of a Jew, elevated into the external cause of our troubles – such a figure enables us to obfuscate the real antagonisms which cut across our societies.
Exactly the same holds for the figure of “fascist” in today’s liberal imagination: it enables people to obfuscate deadlocks which lie at the root of our crisis.
When, in the last elections in France, every leftist scepticism about Macron was immediately denounced as a support for le Pen, the elimination of the left was the true aim of the operation, and the demonised enemy was a convenient prop to sustain this elimination.
The fear not to make any compromises with the alt-right can muddy the degree to which we are already compromised by it. One should greet every sign of this self-critical reflection which is gradually emerging and which, while remaining thoroughly anti-fascist, casts also a critical glance on the weaknesses of the liberal left.
When I drew attention to how parts of the alt-right are mobilising working class issues neglected by the liberal left, I was, as expected, immediately accused of pleading for a coalition between radical left and fascist right, which is exactly what I didn’t propose. The task is to cut off the working class oxygen supply to the alt-right by addressing their voter. The way to achieve this is to move more to the left with a more radical critical message – in other words, to do exactly what Sanders and Corbyn were doing and what was the root of their relative success.
The same goes for the topic of refugees. Refugees mostly don’t want to live in Europe; they want a decent life back at home. Instead of working to achieve that, Western powers treat the problem as a “humanitarian crisis” whose two extremes are hospitality and the fear of losing our way of life. They thereby create a pseudo-“cultural” conflict between refugees and local working class populations, engaging them in a false conflict which transforms a political and economic struggle into one of the “clash of civilisations”.
The sad prospect that awaits us is that of a future in which, every four years, we will be thrown into a panic, scared by some form of “neo-fascist danger,” and in this way blackmailed into casting our vote for the “civilised” candidate in meaningless elections lacking any positive vision.
In between, we’ll be able to sleep in the safe embrace of global capitalism with a human face. The obscenity of the situation is breath-taking: global capitalism is now presenting itself as the last protection against fascism, and if you try to point this out you are accused of complicity with fascism.
Today’s panicky anti-fascism doesn’t bring hope, it kills hope – the hope that we’ll really get rid of the threat of racist populism.