Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Is it Kili Maharaja or Maithripala Sirisena ? You must decide who is ruling the country – Sujeewa airs UNP’s disillusionment (Full video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 23.Nov.2017, 2.35PM)  For the first time UNP returned the ‘gun fire’  of Kili- Maithri group that had  been unrelentingly launching unjust attacks targeting the UNP. This furious  firing came  from the cannon of UNP deputy minister Sujeewa Senasinghe. He said plainly , it should be either Kili  or Maithri who should run the country – not both. 
‘I am indeed thoroughly  disillusioned with the president . We appointed you after risking our lives. Specially, it was not to   escalate  the political issues.  I think one Institution has given the  idea to you ,by  destroying  Rajapakses and the UNP , you can form a huge force in 2020.

I told you about a month ago , don’t go on extending  the period of this Commission . By extending the term of the Commission it was   allowed    to sling mud at us.
Where is the presidential Commission for the MiG deal ? Where is the presidential commission for the Spectrum ? Rs. 7 to 8 billion are  monies of the people . Where is the presidential Commission for the ship deal? Where is the presidential Commission for the Advertising Companies?
 
With what amount of commitment we installed this government .
Is it stated anywhere , I  spoke to the CID to protect Aloysius ? Is it stated anywhere I spoke to the Central bank officer to protect Aloysius? I spoke only  to obtain the information during the COPE committee . Is it stated anywhere the COPE Committee cannot talk to anyone ? Is there such a law?  Where is it not ethical ?  What did we say after gathering that information?   We told to conduct an investigation pertaining to Perpetual Treasuries. If I have to put through a deal , need I have to make 40 telephone calls ? It can be done in two phone calls. I am a lawyer. If I want to transact a deal , will I take calls on my phone? 
It is one channel that is slinging mud. Either that channel should administer the country or president Maithripala.  One of them must decide who should run the country. Upul Jayasuriya was ousted on a phone call on the Chalmer’s land transaction. These are deals? Thereafter Muhundan of TRC was ousted on a phone call . This Commission too was  not president’s . After dragging the Commission on and on ,and  after slinging mud at us , it was concluded.
These are  my personal hard feelings against the president. We are also in the same age  range of his children. If he is shielding his children , and  if  Lanka e news attacking him is bad  ,then  if another media is attacking us , that too is bad

We were with you. You said you were coming along with 20 , but  you came only with four . Our group said,  ‘ Sir, don’t give if he is coming only with four.’ Rosie Senanayake stood up and said , ‘ Don’t say like that , now he has come in no matter how many he brought  , so let us start our struggle’ 
The next to get up was me ,’Sir , never mind how many he brought , let us launch on our struggle, ’ I told. 
Hence , if there is anything wrong in what I am disclosing , you can appoint any Commission . You are the president. You cannot point a finger at us and say , rogues are not being caught .  If you can appoint a Bond Commission , similarly you can do that  for the others too.
Of course these are my personal sentiments . I do not know whether the P.M.  would blame me.’
Video footage of Senasinghe’s full speech is hereunder 
---------------------------
by     (2017-11-23 09:19:50)

Sirisena Blocking Gota’s Arrest

Gota at President’s nephew’s wedding | File photo

















24November 2017
 

President Maithripala Sirisena is sitting on the long-anticipated arrest of Gotabaya Rajapaksa, brother of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa and the former Secretary, Ministry of Defence and Urband Development, Colombo Telegraph learns.


The Attorney General in an unusual move has sought the approval of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and the Minister of Law and Order Sagala Ratnayaka to arrest Gotabaya Rajapaksa over allegations of misappropriating public funds to the tune of Rs 91 million for the construction of memorials for his parents.

While it is questionable as to why the AG’s Department requires permission from anyone to prosecute Gotabaya, there’s also the question as to why the Department picked this relatively smaller infringement and not the MiG deal which is a far more serious infringement considering the money involved.

Wickremesinghe and Ratnayaka, prior to leaving for India, are reported to have distanced themselves from the entire process, informing the AG that it is not their business to advise him on such matters.
 
Colombo Telegraph learns that the delay in prosecution of this as well as other cases involving Gotabaya is solely due to President Sirisena not giving the green light sought from him by the AG, once again not a requirement for prosecution.

On 15th November, Law and Order Minister Sagala Ratnayaka made a detailed presentation to the UNP Working Committee on the current status of the bribery and corruption investigations.

Ratnayaka, in his presentation said that the Police Financial Crimes Investigations Division had forwarded 92 files to the Attorney General’s Department upon completion of investigations. He added that indictments have only been filed with regard to 13 cases.

Read More

Austin Fernando reveals hurdles faced by officers probing corruption

 Austin Fernando reveals hurdles faced by officers probing corruption 

*President’s gaze on illicit commission blinded him : Faces retributive justice after ousting Sinniah !
logoNovember 23, 2017
Secretary to the President, Austin Fernando emphasized the importance of the tasks entrusted to criminal investigation officials. He said that their task is of immense importance to the quest for justice and fight crimes, corruption and frauds.
Outlining the difficulties and challenges faced by the officials, Mr Fernando said when political regime changed, the criminal investigating officers conducting inquiries into allegations of corruption and fraud run into hurdles as sometimes frauds were committed with alleged involvement of some in the bureaucracy, police, law enforcement services, judicial process and media.
He said this addressing the Regional High Level Meeting towards the establishment of a Regional Platform for Sharing of Criminal intelligence in South Asia. 
The specific objective of the meeting is to consider and agree on the viability and structure of a regional platform for the sharing of criminal intelligence to prevent and combat transnational organized crime in South Asia.
Transnational Organized Crime issues have multi-lateral and global dimensions which require global and regional cooperation to counter them.
Source: PMD


final testimony at Bond Commission – Reality Check

Whether PM Ranil Wickremesinghe was ‘summoned’, ‘requested’ or he ‘volunteered’ to present himself before the PCoI is immaterial
The bottom line is that he must be applauded for being a model of probity by other world leaders to come before the PCoI
This article will dwell mainly on the ‘conflict of interest’ since this is at the CENTRE of the alleged bond scam
Bond Commission and AG didn’t force the issue on:   
i) Why the PM handpicked Mahendran – a foreign national as Central Bank Governor
2017-11-24
Whether PM Ranil Wickremesinghe was ‘summoned’, ‘requested’ or he ‘volunteered’ to present himself before the PCoI (Presidential Commission of Inquiry) investigating the alleged Treasury Bond Scams is immaterial. The bottom line is that he must be applauded for being a model of probity worthy of emulation by other world leaders to come before the PCoI (with a large retinue of ministers and parliamentarians) in circumstances where seemingly the PCoI considered his evidence to be only of marginal significance. This position has been amply borne out by (i) PM being given questions in ADVANCE so as to enable him to provide answers by way of affidavit (ii) PM being at the PCoI reportedly for less than an hour to clarify matters arising from his affidavit (iii) limited questions posed to him unlike in the case of other witnesses including former Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake who were GRILLED by Messrs. Dappula de Livera and Yasantha Kodagoda - Senior Additional Solicitor General and Additional Solicitor General respectively (iv) PCoI decision to invite the AG himself who wasn’t involved in the investigation up to that point to personally lead evidence for the FIRST TIME.   
It’s heartening to note that some UNP parliamentarians are fostering Sri Lanka’s age-old cultural traditions by keeping in touch with the grown-up grandchildren of their parents’ friends!
The PCoI also in its wisdom for the most part didn’t question the PM on the damning evidence elicited over the past 8 months from witnesses linked to the alleged Treasury Bond scams at the centre of which was PTL (Perpetual Treasuries Limited) owned/controlled by Arjun Aloysius who is the son-in-law of Arjuna Mahendran a foreign national who was handpicked by the PM to be Central Bank Governor.   
From media reports it is learned that the questions posed to the PM related to (i) Funding requirements (ii) Methodology for the issuance of Treasury Bonds being changed on the advise of the PM from ‘Direct Placement’ to ‘Public Auction ’ (iii) ‘Conflict of Interest’ arising from then Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran’s son-in-law, Arjun Aloysius owning/controlling PTL - a Primary Dealer. 

 Conflict of interest

Although all three issues are associated with controversy, this article will dwell mainly on the ‘conflict of interest’ since this is at the CENTRE of the alleged bond scam. Although the PM CONFIRMED both in his affidavit and while testifying before the Bond Commission that he was AWARE of the ‘conflict of interest’, the Bond Commission and AG going by media reports didn’t force the issue on: 
i) Why the PM handpicked Mahendran – a foreign national as Central Bank Governor being aware of the ‘conflict of interest’?   

 ii) The PM’s affirmation in his affidavit to the Bond Commission: “Upon the formation of the new Government in January 2015 there was a general consensus within the Government that Mr Mahendran should be appointed to the post of Governor of CBSL.”   
Should not the alleged “general consensus” been explored? Did it include HE the President?   
 iii) Why the PM continued to have Mahendran as CBSL Governor although he was aware that Mahendran had RENEGED on his ‘assurance’ to him that his son-in-law (Arjun Aloysius) will sever all links with PTL prior to his appointment as CBSL Governor ?   
iv) The PM’s testimony at the Bond Commission: “Mr. Aloysius did say to me he needs bit of time to dispose his share holding to get good price. (shares of Perpetual Treasuries Ltd or shares he held in other entity in the name of PTL). I met him (Aloysius) at one or two parties, and there he told me that he was pursuing his interests in Mendis distilleries.” 
The four ‘honorable members’ concerned were among the UNP parliamentarians who had introduced the controversial ‘FOOTNOTES’ to the led COPE report  
What is at issue is the INTEGRITY of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka. How can the PM who is also responsible for the CBSL even consider a “bit of time” to resolve a ‘conflict of interest’ concerning the Governor and that too articulated “at one or two parties”?   
v) Why the PM robustly defended and endorsed Mahendran for a second term despite the widespread perception of his role in the alleged bond scam?   

Holding Companies of PTL

At the Bond Commission when asked whether the PM was aware that the “holding companies of PTL were Perpetual Capital Holding Pvt Ltd and Perpetual Capital Pvt Ltd” he pleaded ignorance. However in his affidavit to the PCoI the PM affirmed:
“I became aware that Mr Aloysius had in the month of January itself resigned from the post of Chief Executive Officer and Director of Perpetual Treasuries (Pvt) Ltd. I also became aware that however he remained a Shareholder of that company”   
Since the ‘conflict of interest’ was the CRUX of the alleged Bond scam, in the context of (i) Arjun Aloysius being the son-in-law of then CBSL Governor Mahendran whom the PM handpicked for the position (ii) the PM having removed the Central Bank from the Finance Ministry and placing it under his own ministry (iii) being aware that Mahendran had RENEGED on his ‘assurance’ to him that Arjun Aloysius will SEVER all links with PTL prior to his appointment as CBSL Governor - was it not INCUMBENT on the PM to be AWARE of the holding structure of PTL? Should not the PCoI have pursued this line? 
The PCoI must be congratulated for demonstrating that the law is no respecter of persons and whatever exalted position one holds is immaterial.

 Phone calls and ‘Footnotes’

Since the Prime Minister was satisfied that Arjun Aloysius had divested himself of any tangible association with PTL, is there any justification for detractors to castigate the UNP parliamentarians concerned (some even ministers) who as COPE members had either originated/received several telephone calls/text messages to/from Arjun Aloysius during the period COPE was probing the alleged bond scams primarily involving PTL? After all, what is wrong with friends being in touch with each other? Some even did so for purported literary endeavors.   
It’s heartening to note that some UNP parliamentarians are fostering Sri Lanka’s age-old cultural traditions by keeping in touch with the grown-up grandchildren of their parents’ friends!   
The four ‘honorable members’ concerned were among the UNP parliamentarians who had introduced the controversial ‘FOOTNOTES’ to the Sunil Handunetti led COPE report probing the alleged 27 February 2015 bond scam. It is strongly recommended that those really interested in getting a better understanding of the alleged Bond Scams should peruse the widely read ‘Sunday Times’ exposé of alleged machinations in relation to the Sunil Handunetti led COPE report.   
The ‘Sunday Times’ referred to the ‘Footnotes’ as follows:   
“As is clear, the thrust of these footnotes is to make clear that Mahendran has not been responsible of any impropriety.”   

http://www.sundaytimes.lk/161030/columns/the-dramatic-bond-issue-how-cope-went-beyond-bioscope-215374.html   

Conclusion

The PCoI must be congratulated for demonstrating that the law is no respecter of persons and whatever exalted position one holds is immaterial. To illustrate this principle, the PCoI took it upon itself to invite the AG himself to personally lead the evidence of the PM although in the normal course of events the evidence of a witness which is of marginal significance (as is the case with the PM as presumably opined by the PCoI) would have been led by a Senior State Counsel.   

The Attorney General deserves accolades on his remarkable dexterity and diligence in being able to review all the evidence that transpired during the last 8 months, study the working files of his representatives and study the PM’s response submitted by way of affidavit and marshal all this information in a succinct manner so that the questioning of the PM could have been concluded in under an hour. It must be noted that the AG was made aware of the fact that he had to perform this demanding task only after he received an invitation from the PCoI to personally lead evidence for the FIRST TIME in this investigation.
Just recently the headline in the ‘Daily FT’ of 8 November “Sri Lanka must ‘walk its talk’ to achieve hub status” had the German Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Jorn Rohde while citing the examples of Hong Kong and Singapore “which took off because they put in place the right governance infrastructure”inter alia referring to “zero tolerance of corruption”.   

Central Bank cancels CIFL licence

The licence granted to Central Investments and Finance has been cancelled by the Monetary Board of the Central Bank.
The Central Bank Monetary Board has taken this decision at its meeting held on Nov 6, 2017 and the decision has been taken to issue a notice of cancellation and a letter has been sent to the Colombo Stock Exchange and also the notice of cancellation was communicated to the company on November 17, 2017 the Central Bank said.
The decision has been taken in terms of Section 37 (1) of the Finance Business Act No. 42 of 2011 (FBA).
Monetary Board, however, said the Company may tender objections in writing to the Board, in which case the Board may consider the objection and further action may be determined.
The Monetary Board of the Central Bank in a letter to CSE further informs that future regulatory actions will be informed in due course.
A spokesman of the Depositors Association said that their depositors, deposited their hard earned money at CIFL on the cardinal ground that CIFL was issued a Business Finance License which was issued by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
The Central Bank also issued a press release on October 18, 2016 approving repayment scheme to the deposit holders, a part payment before December 31, 2017 and balance payment with interest within a reasonable period.
Under this circumstances deposit holders legitimate expectation was destroyed by the CBSL by issuing this notification. Deposit holders vehemently object this notification issued to cancel the license. “We have also found two foreign investors to bailout the CIFL.”

Elections To The Sri Lanka Medical Council, But No Annual Reports For Five Years

24November 2017 

Close to the tightly contested election of new office bearers of the Sri Lanka Medical Council (SLMC), it has been shockingly disclosed in a Right to Information appeal filed by a citizen against the SLMC that the Annual Reports of the SLMC have not been printed or published for the past five years!


Prof. Carlo Fonseka – Chairman SLMC (Jan 2012 – Sept 2017)

The last published Annual Report of the SLMC has been 2011. Lawyers appearing in this matter before the RTI Commission on Monday informed Colombo Telegraph that they had appealed to the Commission for the 2012-2016 Annual Reports as they wished to find out what policy decisions had been taken by the SLMC in regard to private medical institutions, including SAITM.

The SLMC had however taken up the position before the Commission that the Annual Reports could not be given as they had not been printed! It said that it was not under a legal obligation to print the Annual Reports!

‘The fact that this premier medical body in Sri Lanka could even put forward the claim without shame that its Annual Reports have not been printed for over five years even though  it has to present these Reports to Parliament is beyond our imagination!’ said one of the lawyers to Colombo Telegraph.
 
The Sri Lanka Medical Council, headed at one time by the likes of Sir Nicholas Attygalle (June 1964-Dec. 1969), an eminent senator, academic and a surgeon, is one of Sri Lanka’s oldest and most elite medical institutions. It describes itself on its website as a statutory body established for the purpose of protecting health care seekers by ensuring the maintenance of academic and professional standards, discipline and ethical practice by health professionals who are registered with it. It has representation from medical faculties of state universities as well as from professionals in the state and private sector. One of its chief functions is to register practitioners engaged in providing healthcare.

The Council states its general duty as being to ‘protect the public and uphold the reputation of the profession.’ Its other duties include the maintaining and publishing registers of qualified persons in different categories to practise each discipline, prescribing the standard of education and standard of medical education, providing advice on professional conduct and medical ethics and taking action against those who are registered with the council if it appears that they have become unfit to practise and exercise the privileges of registration.

Due to the Council stating that it had no Annual Reports from 2012 onwards, the RTI Commission had ordered that the minutes of the meetings of the Council during the years in question for which the non-published Annual Reports relate to, reflecting policy decisions taken by the Council and notified in Annual Reports, be released to the appellant without including information relating to personal details of doctors or medical records. The Council had agreed to release the relevant portions of the minutes of its meetings starting from the year 2012. The SLMC elections are being conducted after a lapse of time, reports state.

Read More

Maithri requests MR to rescue him from impeachment motion; agrees to sacrifice Duminda in favor of Susil !

o

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 23.Nov.2017, 6.45PM) President Maithripala Sirisena has requested people discarded ex president Medamulana Mahinda Rajapakse to rescue him from the impending impeachment motion in parliament against him , based on reports reaching Lanka e news inside information division.
This request was made by the incumbent president amidst the secret discussions which are being held by the SLFP group of Maithripala with the Rajapakse  group   of the Joint opposition , which discussions in fact  stem from the fear harbored by the SLFP group of losing at the forthcoming  local government elections.
With a view to enlist the support of the Joint opposition , the president has started to attack even the second row UNP leaders these days. This was well  illustrated  by  the mudslinging campaign that is being conducted  against the clean and corruption free UNP   ministers and M.P.s while making mention of  some phone calls  of second row UNP leaders. The sole and whole aim of Maithri’s  subterfuge is to  please the Joint opposition  and secure its support  at the upcoming local government elections.
 
Maithri who is undoubtedly in  mortal fear of a UNP impeachment motion against him   has  sought Mahinda Rajapakse’s  support. The worst part of this latest endeavor  is ,  Maithripala is now  engaged in a gross   betrayal of  the very UNP which saved him from Mahinda Rajapakse who issued dire threats to bury Maithri  six feet underground. Besides, though it  was UNP which put him on the presidential throne , Sirisena is today seeking Mahinda against UNP.  Serpents which gobble up eggs are safer than serpents which gobble up hoppers.
No matter what , it is learnt president Maithripala has concurred  with many of the conditions laid down by Mahinda’s group to the Maithripala group during the discussions. (That was why Dayasiri Jayasekera at the last cabinet meeting exclaimed   ‘  thank god , we are saved if we join’)

The main condition of Mahinda is  , SLFP Gen. Secretary Duminda Dissanayake  should be removed and Susil Premachandra shall take over that post , which had been accepted by president Maithripala.

When Duminda Dissanayake was intimated of this , he had said , if they are requesting him to resign from the Gen. Secretary post , he would not only quit the Gen . Secretary post but also  join the UNP.

It is well to recall when Maithripala Sirisena on 2014-11-21 abandoned the SLFP and came out , Duminda Dissanayake was one of those in that small group who stood by loyally and came out with Maithripala . Hence , the latter getting ready to sacrifice Duminda at the altar of his self centeredness and selfish opportunistic agendas is most reprehensible . This same fate was suffered by Hirunika Premachandra too earlier on…. 
At that time when the whole area was surrounded by the STF , for the inaugural media  discussion it was Hirunika Premachandra who crept out the window to extend support to Maithripala , along with Chandrika Bandaranaike (ex president). Yet , Maithripala did not appoint Hirunika as the Kolonnawa organizer which post was held even by her grandfather (late Bharatha’s father –Bharatha was killed  under most tragic circumstances) and subsequently by her late father Bharatha. Maithripala instead appointed Thilanga Sumathipala who lost at  the elections,   to that post . Finally , it was the UNP leader who came to her rescue when she was in distress and politically sidelined. She was given the post of UNP organizer , Ratmalana.  Now Duminda Silva is also being dragged  down  to that same  despair. 
In any case , a former SLFP secretary S.B. Dissanayake has strongly objected to the removal of Duminda from the Gen. Secretary post and replacing him with Susil Premachandra. He too had stated , if that happens he will join the UNP. S.B.  has already discussed with the UNP leader  regarding his cross over to the UNP. However the UNP leader had told him not to get  ruffled , and to wait for a while.
It is learnt  president Sirisena is already offering baits to a powerful UNP stalwart holding two ministerial portfolios and a popular UNP figure.

Await more reports on the betrayals and opportunistic politics  of Maithripala Sirisena of the rainbow revolution .
---------------------------
by     (2017-11-23 13:24:49)

SLFP and JO are attempting to postpone LG polls - Kavinda



logoNovember 23, 2017

UNP MP Kavinda Jayawardene alleged that Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and the Joint Opposition are attempting to postpone Local Government polls.

“The SLFP knowing that they will end placing fourth at the Local Government polls if they contest individually, are trying to postpone the election. Our party made this revelation continuously,” he alleged while addressing a media briefing held today. (23).
The MP said that Minister of Provincial Councils and Local Government Faiszer Musthapha should resign by considering exemplary personalities of the party.

Oust Musthapha – struggle to get election held at due time

Vijitha

 

“We are prepared to get the election to be held at the due time by carrying out struggles within the Parliament as well as outside it. For, it is a right of the people and we cannot allow this right to be denied due to the internal crises in political parties. Postponing elections and denying the people of their right to vote would have very drastic consequences. We have experienced these in our history. We should prevent such instances. That could be done only by winning democracy – by getting to hold elections. We are prepared to struggle and the first of these struggles would be against Faiser Musthapha. The no-confidence motion would be handed over to the Speaker within the next two or three days,” said the Information Secretary of the JVP Vijitha Herath. He said this speaking at a press conference held at the head office of the JVP at Pelawatta today (23rd).

Mr. Herath said, “The press conference was arranged today to apprise the views of the JVP regarding the situation created by the stay order issued by the Court of Appeal against the Gazette released by the Minister of Provincial Councils. The local government election had to be held 2 ½ years ago. However, it was postponed quoting various reasons. Of course, there was a need to change the old electoral system and there were issues regarding delimitation process. The committee to go into the delimitation process was appointed by the Minister with the approval of the cabinet. The committee headed by Mr. Ashoka Peiris functioned for more than a year and presented a report to the Minister pointing out issues and with recommendations. The Minister should have issued a Gazette notification based on these recommendations. Minister Faiz Musthapha issued the Gazette based on these recommendations. The election has to be held based on this Gazette. In November the Minister also issued the Gazette giving the number of wards and seats for local councils. It was possible to remove all the obstacles that were against holding the election. The government was not genuinely interested in holding the election. However, the election had to be given due to the struggle carried out by our party, civil society organizations and the majority of the people in this country. The UNP, the SLFP or the government were not prepared to hold the election. The strategy of the government was to put off the election as farther as possible. The SLFP wanted the election postponed due to the internal rift in that party. The UNP did not have anything to show to their members. Despite having a government of their own the UNP could not do anything to make the grassroots level members of the party satisfied. As such both these parties wanted the election postponed. However, a stage came up where they couldn’t avoid holding the local government election. All the bills that obstructed having a local government election were amended. The legal obstructions too were removed and the environment to hold the election was created with the mediation of many parties. This is how the Elections Commission announced that a notice regarding nominations could be issued on or after the 27th November, on 11th to 14th December nominations could be received and the election could be held on the 27 or 28th January. It is only after everything had been finalized that the conspiracy making use of the court order was suddenly hatched as the government did not have any other reason to postpone the election. That’s why the government used the legal space to postpone the election. It is a well-planned conspiracy with the knowledge of stalwarts of the government. The case was filed in the Court of Appeal without going to the Supreme Court mainly to waste more time. For, they could go to Supreme Court if the judgment is not in their favour. Then they could waste more time.
The main reason for this move is the crisis within the SLFP. The SLFP, specially the Maithri faction, fears to face an election. However, the UNP has not been able to change this situation despite they are partners of the same government. They join together on the budget but regarding the election, they have two views. It is the government that should be responsible for the people, not the SLFP or the UNP though they jointly form the government. It is the government that should hold elections at due times. It is the government that should be responsible for postponing the election not one faction of the government. No one can point the finger at the other and say they are the ones who have filed the petitions. The government should be able to negate such attempts if it really wanted to hold the election.

The Appeals Committee on the demarcation of boundaries of local government institutions presented their report at the beginning of this year and the Gazette was issued in February. The authority to issue the gazette is Minister Faizer Musthapha. The main argument of the petitioners is that the Gazette issued by the Minister in February is erroneous. The petitioners are associates of the Maithri faction and the petitions have been filed with a plan. The ‘clue’ for the case has been taken from the Gazette the Minister issued with his signature. It is no one else but the Minister who is aware of this ‘clue’. He should be held responsible, as the subject minister, for issuing an erroneous Gazette. Didn’t the Minister know that the Appeals Committee on the demarcation of boundaries didn’t have the authority to decide on the number of wards, merging or demerge them? Mr. Faizer Musthapha is a President’s Counsel. Doesn’t he know the law? He knows the law very well. He knew the functions of the Appeals Committee on the demarcation of boundaries what authority it did not have. When the committee was appointed its functions were known. It is with this understanding that a cabinet paper was presented and approved. If the Committee had exceeded its powers he should have been aware of it. If he doesn’t know the law, despite being a President’s Counsel, he could have consulted the Attorney General’s Department. Usually, AG’s department is consulted in such instances. He has deliberately issued the erroneous Gazette. The conspiracy here is very clear. Petitions are filed in Court in November for the Gazette that was issued in February. If there was an error in the Gazette the Minister has failed to see the error for nine months and has failed to correct it. If anyone wants to genuinely challenge the Gazette he wouldn’t wait until the last moment to go to Courts. It is very clear the move is a maneuver designed by the faction that includes Faizer Musthapha. Their need had been to wait until the last moment and go to Court to get the election postponed. It is Faizer Musthapha and the group that is aware of the ‘error’ that is in the Gazette. As such, he is the creator of the Gazette as well as the mastermind of the conspiracy. It is a serious crime. For, local government election is the right to vote of the people at grassroots level. All local government councils in the country do not function properly at the moment. It is these grassroots level institutions that give the ordinary folk their rights and powers. These institutions are the only means of getting their issues solved. Once they are broken down the people at the grassroots level have no way of getting their issues solved.

On the other hand, postponing elections does not suit good governance. A fundamental of good governance is establishing democracy – to have elections at the due time and give the people opportunity to elect their representatives. As such, this move has shown the government’s unethical and illegal way of getting their own way. This is a drastic attack on democracy and the right of the people to vote. The subject minister has committed a serious crime. Issuing the Gazette knowing there was an error was a blatant crime. When a case has been filed against him the Minister has fled the country. When there is a serious issue the Minister is not there to take any action. Minister Faizer Musthapha, as the subject minister, has neglected his responsibility and has allowed opportunities to file petitions against the Gazette using the ‘clue’ he left deliberately in the content of the Gazette.
As such, the Minister who stole people’s right to vote, who deliberately allowed taking moves to postpone the election should not continue to hold the portfolio. He has no moral or legal right to continue to hold the post. Hence, as the JVP, we demand that Faizer Musthapha should be immediately removed from his portfolio. The President should take this decision. However, we know that the President would not take this decision. For, it is the need of the President and his faction that was fulfilled by the Minister. We believe that the majority of members in the parliament would not approve the arbitrary move of the Minister. He has no right to hold the portfolio. He is a failure as a minister as he issues erroneous Gazettes. As such, we hope to bring a no-confidence motion against Minister Faizer Musthapha for the crime of postponing the election by deliberately issuing an erroneous Gazette. We hope Members of different parties would agree with us and we invite all to condemn the Minister who, despite being a President’s Counsel, is unable to compile a Gazette without errors and who has set in motion a move to deny the voting right of the people in this country.

We are also prepared to get the election to be held at the due time by carrying out struggles within the Parliament as well as outside it. For, it is a right of the people and we cannot allow this right to be denied due to the internal crises in political parties. Postponing elections and denying the people of their right to vote would have very drastic consequences. We have experienced these in our history. We should prevent such instances. That could be done only by winning democracy by getting to hold elections. We are prepared to struggle and the first of these struggles would be against Faiser Musthapha. The no-confidence motion would be handed over to the Speaker within the next two or three days.”

Presidential predicament For a patch up he would have to grant some drastic concessions to Rajapaksa. On the other hand he would be totally left to Rajapaksa’s mercy


2017-11-24

It is not clear whether the President’s apparent blowing hot and cold in respect of mending relationship with Rajapaksa group indicates the Catch-22 situation he is in or he is attempting to hoodwink the Rajapaksa camp at a time when the latter is picking up candidates for the local polls.
With a nationwide election approaching, the vulnerability of the official SLFP seems to have left its members restless and insecure. This, in turn is applying pressure on the President to court the dissidents.
The possibility of mending fences by the two factions of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) led by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the incumbent president Maithripala Sirisena is quite remote, despite several people attempting to bring the two factions together, especially to contest the forthcoming local Government elections.
It was the Mahinda Rajapaksa faction that wanted a patch up between the two groups earlier in 2015 and 2016, with a view to circumvent the so-called anti-corruption drive of the Yahapalana Government, but the Maithri faction did not show much interest then. However, now the two groups seem to have swapped the positions with many SLFPers in the Government approaching the Mahinda faction seeking a restoration of relationship.

This is explicable in the light of the delicate situation of the group led by President Sirisena in respect of the forthcoming elections.

The mindset of the grass root level members and the supporters of the SLFP is not clear or seems to be more favourable to the former President.

With a nationwide election approaching, the vulnerability of the official SLFP seems to have left its members restless and insecure. This, in turn is applying pressure on the President to court the dissidents.
Hence, some of the SLFP Ministers were seen recently making desperate attempts to get a conciliatory word from the former President or anyone of his close subordinates.

Minister Susil Premajayantha whose heart has always been with Mahinda Rajapaksa even after he joined the Government had recently gone to meet his former boss with reported blessings of President Sirisena, while the Parliamentary group of the Joint Opposition was in session.
However, his frantic efforts had gone down the drain.
There were reports two weeks ago that Western Province Chief Minister Isura Devapriya who is a close ally of President Sirisena had unsuccessfully approached leader of the Joint Opposition and the Mahajana Eksatha Peramuna (MEP) Dinesh Gunawardene with a suggestion to contest the local polls jointly in their area, Maharagama. Another report said that Minister Wijith Wijayamuni Zoysa has also declared that the SLFP would face the elections with Mahinda Rajapaksa. His statement was seen ironic and was ridiculed as it was he who once soon after Mahinda Rajapaksa was defeated at the Presidential election had proverbially said that nobody would keep his father’s body at home after his death.
Now he also had tried his hand in reconciliation with the same “deceased father”. The allegation that the SLFP led by President Sirisena attempts to delay the local Government elections announced by the Election Commission to be held in January has also to be viewed in this light
However, Mahinda faction that has made up its mind to go solo at the forthcoming elections seems to be firm in their demand that the SLFP group in the Government should sever links with the United National Party (UNP), if the two factions were to jointly face the polls. This is a demand that is impossible for the Maithri faction to meet, as they know that it would be suicidal for them, especially for the President, not only politically but also literally.
The President would have to grant some drastic concessions in the event of a patch up with the Mahinda faction such as withdrawal of major legal actions taken against the leaders of the joint Opposition, especially those against the members of the Rajapaksa family.
On the other hand, it would strengthen Rajapaksa’s hand while pushing President Sirisena to an awkward position as he would be totally left to Rajapaksa’s mercy.
It must be remembered that during the last Parliamentary election President Sirisena had stated that once Rajapaksa becomes the Prime Minister the Presidency would be at a bullet’s distance to him (Rajapaksa).
And the relationship between the two leaders has been such that the President had also once observed that he would have been six feet under the ground had Mahinda Rajapaksa won the Presidential election in 2015.
Days after Premajayantha met the former President, UNP Chairman Malik Samarawickrema and General Secretary Kabir Hashim had met President Sirisena and asked whether he was getting together with Mahinda Rajapaksa.
It was reported that the President had asked “Mey sarama endagena eka karanna puluwanda? (Can I do it wearing this sarong?).  
However, it was said that Premajayantha went on the peace mission with the blessings of the President.
It is not clear whether the President’s apparent blowing hot and cold in respect of mending relationship with Rajapaksa group indicates the Catch-22 situation he is in or he is attempting to hoodwink the Rajapaksa camp at a time when the latter is picking up candidates for the local polls.
Yet, the relationship between the President and the UNP is also not without problems. The best indication of it was the media conference that was convened by State Minister Sujeeva Senasinghe where he said he was badly disappointed with the President after he (the President) appointed the Presidential Commission to investigate into the controversial Central Bank bond issue.
He went onto describe the move by the President as a conspiracy against the UNP. It is ironic that a man who was in the forefront against corruption calling a probe into a scam a conspiracy and not the very scam.
The Sunday Times reported in its last issue that the President had ordered Inspector General of Police Pujith Jayasundera to stop an investigation ordered by Minister Sagala Ratnayake and conducted by a Special Investigation Unit (SIU) into the Financial Crimes Division to determine whether there was any inaction on its part that delayed taking action over high profile cases.
The President while stopping the probe had observed that internecine rivalry at the highest levels of the police was causing serious problems.
However, the report further said that two days after the President’s order Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had appointed an official committee to probe delays at the FCID and the Attorney General’s Department.
Earlier the President had reportedly accused a UNP minister for the delay or stalling of investigations into high profile cases and the Prime minister had denied it while claiming that there was multitude of other reasons for the delays.
It must be recalled that the President accused his partner in governance, the UNP in last July as well, claiming that allegations of high profile corruption against the leaders of the last regime, including the Rajapaksa family are being gradually swept under the carpet.
It is interesting and in a way pathetic to note that the two leaders at the highest level of the Government, even nearly three years after they had taken over the reins of the country, were clueless about the delays in the investigations into the major corruption cases.
Whatever in his mind may be, the President seems to be in a quandary in moving ahead as the leader of the SLFP.
On the one hand the pressure within his party to patch up with his dissidents is mounting while the UNP, as being his real strength, is pushing him on the opposite direction. If contested future elections on its own, the SLFP led by the President would run the risk of ranking third among major political parties.
But on the other hand a patch up would not be in his favour but in his main adversary’s and it would sometimes be the beginning of the end of his political as well as personal fortunes.
It would really be interesting to see how he as seasoned politician is going to overcome the situation very soon at the forthcoming local Government elections.   
Inside Saudi Arabia's gilded prison
BBC23 November 2017

Dozens of prominent Saudi figures are being held in the Ritz-Carlton in Riyadh. Many names are still secret, but the list is said to comprise at least 11 princes. It is part of an anti-corruption drive by the young Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman.
The BBC's Lyse Doucet was the first journalist to be allowed inside the hotel. She was given access by Saudi authorities.

Slovenia PM facing impeachment over support for refugee

Miro Cerar accused of seeking to interfere with judiciary after he voiced support for Syrian man, Ahmad Shamieh, who is facing deportation

The prime minister of Slovenia, Miro Cerar, one of the few liberal leaders in central and eastern Europe, is facing impeachment over his support for a Syrian asylum seeker who is facing deportation.

 in Brussels-Thursday 23 November 2017 

Should the country’s rightwing opposition party be successful in their motion, Cerar, the leader of the centrist moderate party, could be dismissed from office by the Slovenian MPs, although government sources insist the prime minister has enough support in parliament to vote down the motion.

The future of Ahmad Shamieh, a 60-year-old man who arrived in Slovenia in 2015, where he learned the language and became an example of successful refugee integration, has nevertheless become a key dividing line in the country’s politics, whatever the outcome of the impeachment process.


 Slovenia’s prime minister, Miro Cerar. Photograph: Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP/Getty Images

Government sources claim the opposition to Cerar’s support of Shamieh is a “staged case” designed to destabilise the government in the run-up to national elections next year.

Many tens of thousands of refugees have passed through Slovenia since the refugee crisis began, leading Cerar to claim two years ago that without action to control Europe’s frontiers, the EU would collapse as individual member states took unilateral action. The issue of immigration remains highly controversial in the country.

Shamieh’s case took hold of the public imagination when his asylum claim was rejected this summer by the Slovenian courts, which ordered that he should be deported in order to make his application for asylum in Croatia, his first port of call in the EU after leaving Syria.

Two prominent MPs, Jan Škoberne, from the leftwing SD party in the coalition government, and Mihe Kordiš, an MP from the leftwing opposition Levica party, took Shamieh to Slovenia’s parliament building to prevent the police from taking him away.

When pushed in a press conference last week on his own response to the case, Cerar, who has been prime minister since 2014, suggested that he also wanted to find a way to grant Shamieh residence on the grounds of his integration into Slovenian society.

His response prompted claims from rightwingers in the Slovenian parliament that Cerar, a constitutional lawyer, had sought to interfere in the affairs of the independent judiciary.


Refugees are escorted through fields by police in Slovenia. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

On 15 November the opposition Slovenian Democratic party (SDS), led by Janez Janša, a rightwing former prime minister, announced they would seek to impeach Cerar.

Janša, who was sentenced to two years in prison on corruption charges in 2013, only for the case to be later dismissed by the constitutional court, has previously accused Cerar of being anti-Slovenian, for putting foreigners first.

While other eastern European states have boycotted an EU scheme to disperse refugees, Slovenia has taken in 335 people from Greece and Italy out of its EU quota of 567.

Cerar has 30 days to answer the charges before a vote in parliament, where the opposition will require a two-thirds majority to carry the motion and force a public court hearing.

Only three impeachment motions have been submitted to parliament in the history of the country, founded in 1991 from former Yugoslavia, but none as yet have received a sufficient backing to proceed to the constitutional court.

In the course of events, Shamieh has suffered a nervous breakdown and is currently in a psychiatric hospital.

He is still expected to be deported to Croatia once he is better, where he will be able to apply to return to Slovenia. Senior Slovenian government sources said, however, that Shamieh’s ill-health may also offer him a right to appeal to the Slovenian court.

Slovenian government sources further claimed that the issue had been politicised by both the left and the right to destabilise Cerar’s government in the lead-up to next’s years parliamentary elections.

“It is a tragic case,” said one source. “Left and right have used him for their own purposes and the government was squeezed in between. This is a staged affair.”

How Israel is 'cleansing' Palestinians from Greater Jewish Jerusalem


Measures aim to annex settlements to city and turn Palestinian areas into a no man’s land, warn rights groups
The remains of a house after it was destroyed by Israeli troops in Beit Surik near Jerusalem, 15 November (AFP)

Jonathan Cook's picture
Jonathan Cook-Thursday 23 November 2017

JERUSALEM - Israel is putting in place the final pieces of a Greater Jewish Jerusalem that will require “ethnically cleansing” tens of thousands of Palestinians from a city their families have lived and worked in for generations, human rights groups have warned.
The pace of physical and demographic changes in the city has accelerated dramatically since Israel began building a steel and concrete barrier through the city’s Palestinian neighbourhoods more than decade ago, according to the rights groups and Palestinian researchers.
Israel is preparing to cement these changes in law, they note. Two parliamentary bills with widespread backing among government ministers indicate the contours of Jerusalem’s future.
One bill intends to annex to Jerusalem some 150,000 Jews in illegal West Bank settlements surrounding the city. As well as bolstering the city’s Jewish population, the move will give these additional settlers a vote in Jerusalem’s municipal elections, pushing it politically even further to the right.
Construction work in Ramat Shlomo, a Jewish settlement in the eastern sector of Jerusalem (AFP)
Another bill will deny more than 100,000 Palestinians on the “wrong” side of the barrier rights in the city. They will be assigned to a separate local council for Palestinians only, in what observers fear will be a prelude to stripping them of residency and barring them from Jerusalem.
Meanwhile, a web of harsh Israeli policies, including late-night arrests, land shortages, home demolitions and a denial of basic services, are intensifying the pressure on Palestinians inside the wall to move out.
'What is going on is ethnic cleansing, without guns'
- Aviv Tartasky, researcher 
These measures are designed to pre-empt any future peace efforts, and effectively nullify Palestinian ambitions for a state with East Jerusalem as its capital, said Aviv Tartasky, a field researcher with Ir Amim, an Israeli group advocating fair treatment for Palestinians in Jerusalem.
“What is going on is ethnic cleansing, without guns,” Tartasky told Middle East Eye. “Israel hopes to get rid of a third of Jerusalem’s Palestinian population through legislative moves alone.”

Demographic fears

Israel’s demographic concerns in Jerusalem date back to 1967, when it occupied and annexed East Jerusalem, combining the large Palestinian population there with West Jerusalem’s Jewish population. It also expanded the city’s municipal borders as a way to covertly annex West Bank land.
Israel initially set an upper limit of 30 percent Palestinians to 70 percent Jews in what it called its new “united, eternal capital”, but has been losing the battle to maintain that ratio ever since. Higher Palestinian birth rates mean that today there are more than 315,000 Palestinians in East Jerusalem, comprising nearly 40 percent of the city’s total population. Projections suggest Palestinians could be a majority within a decade.
Although few Palestinians in Jerusalem have taken or been allowed Israeli citizenship, and almost none vote in municipal elections, Israel fears their growing numerical weight will increasingly make its rule in the city untenable.
“What we have in Jerusalem is an apartheid system in the making,” Mahdi Abd al-Hadi, a Palestinian academic in Jerusalem, told MEE.
“Israeli policies are dictated by demographic considerations and that has created a huge gulf between the two societies. Palestinians are being choked.”

‘Save Jewish Jerusalem’

Fear of the demographic loss of Jerusalem provoked the launch of a high-profile campaign by political and security leaders last year: “Save Jewish Jerusalem”. Fearful that Palestinians will soon be a majority and might start voting in municipal elections, the campaign warned Jewish residents they would “wake up to a Palestinian mayor in Jerusalem”.  
Over the past year government ministers, including Education Minister Naftali Bennett, have aggressively pushed for the annexation of Maale Adumim, a large settlement outside Jerusalem, in the West Bank. Gradually, they appear to be winning the argument.  
'Israeli policies are dictated by demographic considerations and that has created a huge gulf between the two societies. Palestinians are being choked'
- Mahdi Abd al-Hadi, academic
Late last month a ministerial committee was set to approve a Greater Jerusalem Bill, legislation intended to expand Jerusalem’s municipal borders to include Maale Adumim and several other large settlements in the West Bank. It won Netanyahu’s backing.  
The settlements would be annexed in all but name, and their 150,000 residents would be eligible to vote in municipal elections.

De facto annexation

Yisrael Katz, the minister of transport and intelligence who helped introduce the bill, has said its purpose is to “safeguard a Jewish majority” in the city. A recent poll showed 58 percent of Israeli Jews support the plan. 
Under pressure from the administration of US President Donald Trump, Netanyahu has temporarily put the bill on the back burner. Washington is reportedly worried that the legislation will stymie a peace initiative it is reportedly about to unveil.
The Israeli separation barrier separating the West Bank town of Bethlehem from Jerusalem (AFP)
Ir Amim fears the legislation is likely to be revived when pressure dissipates. A position paper it published last week warned that the legislation was the “first practical move since the annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967 to implement the de facto annexation of areas in the West Bank to Israel”.
After decades of implanting Jewish settlers in the midst of Palestinian areas to prevent their development and growth, Israel is beginning the difficult process of disentangling the two populations, said Tartasky.

Eviction notices

The effects are being felt keenly on the ground.
Last Friday, Israeli forces stormed the Bedouin village of Jabal al-Baba and issued “eviction” notices to its 300 residents. In August the Israeli army demolished the village’s kindergarten school. 
Jabal al-Baba stands between East Jerusalem and Maale Adumim.
Read more ►
“These Palestinian communities outside Jerusalem are like a bone in the throat for Israel,” said Tartasky. “Israel is trying to make their life as hard as possible to force them to leave, and so create a territorial continuity between Jerusalem and the settlements.”
The latest raid on Jabal al-Baba came immediately after Israel notified the hundreds of residents of Walaja that a military checkpoint would be relocated close to the entrance to their village. That will cut them off from ancient agricultural terraces on Jerusalem’s uplands their families have farmed for generations.
Although many of Walaja’s residents have Jerusalem identity papers issued by Israel, the new move will effectively seal them off from the city, as well as their lands. The terraces and a nearby spring, where the villagers water livestock, will become “attractions” in an expanded Jerusalem metropolitan park.

Chokehold tightening

Meanwhile, Israel is tightening its chokehold on Palestinians in East Jerusalem’s built-up areas.
Those on the far side of the concrete wall have been effectively abandoned by the Jerusalem municipality, and are finding it ever harder to access the rest of the city, said Daoud Alg’ol, a Palestinian researcher on Jerusalem.
A bill by Zeev Elkin, the Jerusalem affairs minister, is designed to disconnect from the Jerusalem municipality Palestinian neighbourhoods such as Walaja, Kafr Aqab, Shuafat refugee camp and Anata, which lie beyond the separation wall.
Read more ►
They would be hived off into a separate local council for Palestinians, instantly reducing the city’s Palestinian population by a third.
“Once Palestinians are in a separate local council, Israel will say the centre of their life is no longer in Jerusalem and their Jerusalem residency papers will be revoked,” said Alg’ol. “This already happens, but now it will be on a much larger scale.”
Since 1967, Israel has revoked the residency permits of more than 14,000 Palestinians, forcing them to leave Jerusalem.

Twilight zones of neglect

Even though their residents pay taxes to the Jerusalem municipality, Palestinian areas outside the barrier are already “twilight zones” of neglect and lawlessness.
In Kafr Aqab, for example, which is sealed off from the rest of East Jerusalem behind the wall and a military checkpoint, residents receive few services. Israel, however, has also denied the Palestinian Authority access.
“They are living in a no-man’s land,” said Alg’ol.
A Jewish worshipper sleeps next to his weapon near the Western Wall in Jerusalem's Old City (Reuters)
These areas have become a destination both for criminals and for Palestinian families caught out by Israel’s intricate web of strict residency regulations. Palestinians in the West Bank are denied access inside Jerusalem’s wall, while Palestinians in Jerusalem risk being stripped of their residency papers if they move out of the city.
Couples who have married across that residency divide have found a refuge in Kfar Aqab as Israel slowly disconnects the neighbourhood from East Jerusalem. Residents say the population there has rocketed from a few thousand to tens of thousands in the past few years.
As a result, a building boom has taken place beyond the wall as Palestinians take advantage of Israel’s lack of enforcement of building regulations. That has offered demographic gains for Israel too, said Alg’ol.

Housing crisis

“Planning restrictions and land shortages inside the wall have created a housing crisis for Palestinians, making it too expensive for them to live there,” he said. “They have been forced to move to areas outside the wall to find more affordable housing. Economic pressure is creating a silent transfer.”
Palestinians in neighbourhoods inside the wall are being driven out in other ways, noted Tartasky.
Traditionally, Israel has used a range of policies to strip Palestinians of land and prevent development in Jerusalem and justify house demolitions.
Read more ►
Those have included declaring Palestinian areas “national parks”, thereby criminalising the homes in them; confiscating the last green areas to build Jewish settlements; and allowing settlers to take over Palestinian properties in the Old City and surrounding neighbourhoods as Israel seeks to strengthen its hold over the city’s holy sites, especially al-Aqsa mosque.
There are now some 200,000 Jewish settlers living in East Jerusalem.
“Palestinians are never part of the planning in Jerusalem, and their interests are never taken into account – they are always an obstacle to be removed,” Alg’ol told MEE. “Israel wants the land but not the Palestinians on it.”

Late-night raids

Pressure has mounted on Palestinians in Jerusalem, noted Tartasky, as their communities have been denied schools and basic municipal services. More than 80 percent of Palestinian children live below the poverty line.
The Jerusalem municipality and police have also begun stepping up “law enforcement” operations against Palestinians – or what residents term “collective punishment”. Under claims of “restoring order”, there has been a wave of recent late-night raids in areas like A-Tur and Issawiya. Large numbers of Palestinians have been arrested, demolition orders issued and businesses closed. 
“Israel is using the same militarised methods as in the West Bank,” said Tartasky. “The assumption is these pressures will encourage them [the Palestinians] to move to areas outside the barrier, where sooner or later they will lose their residency rights.
'Israel wants to create a make-believe city free of Palestinians. Where it can, it is ethnically cleansing them from the city. And where it can’t, it simply hides them from view'
- Daoud Alg’ol, researcher
“Israel has realised that is an opportunity it can exploit.”
The office of Jerusalem’s mayor, Nir Barkat, issued a statement to MEE denying that the situation of Palestinians in East Jerusalem was deteriorating. It said that there had been dramatic improvements in Palestinian areas in the provision of schools, community centres, sports fields, new roads, postal services and welfare.
It added that Barkat had “developed a plan unprecedented in scope and budget allocation to reduce gaps in East Jerusalem in order to address the 50 years of neglect he inherited from his municipal predecessors and successive Israeli governments.”
Alg’ol said the municipal claims were a denial of reality. “Israel wants to create a make-believe city free of Palestinians,” he said. “Where it can, it is ethnically cleansing them from the city. And where it can’t, it simply hides them from view.”