Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Parliamentary Privileges Not Violated By Checking Phones Of MPs Suspected Of Wrongdoing — Vasu


22November 2017 

Vasudeva Nanayakkara, MP, contends that it is well within the law and not a contravention of parliamentary privileges to check the phone records of MPs suspected of wrongdoing and submitting such findings to the particular court or commission.

Vasudeva Nanayakkara
Nanayakkara, referring to a privileges question raised subsequent to revelations that certain members of COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises) had communicated with the prime suspect behind the Central Bank bond scandal, Arjun Aloysius, said in a media release that once a Comission appointed by the President has been tasked to investigate, if the said Commission fails to conduct such investigate that would be an infringment of privileges of all MPs.

He also pointed out that the investigating officers had checked the phone records of Aloysius and not those of the relevant MPs.
Nanayakkara charged that investigating officers are now being queried by their superiors in the Police Department, a state of affairs which he considers a challenge to the Commission. Whether such queries have been initiated by the IGP or a higher political authority is unknown, Nanayakkara said.

The media release follows a statement by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya to the effect that the Privileges Committee would take up the matter of telephone conversations of COPE members and that a discussion with party leaders will also take place. The Speaker was referring to a complaint made by Minister Lakshman Kiriella on Monday.

MP Bandula Gunawardana of the Joint Opposition meanwhile has stated that Kiriella’s assertion was erroneous since the phones of COPE members had not been tapped, as revealed by the PCoI.
Kiriella, however had explained that what was objectionable was not investigating but leaking the information to the media.

Sri Lanka: Minister’s cock and bull story

( November 22, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The statement made by State Minister of International Trade Sujeewa Senasinghe in a media briefing convened yesterday (21st) regarding the 62 telephone calls he exchanged with the main accused of the fraud that had been committed in connection with the issuance of bonds by the Central Bank on 27th February, 2015 while the investigation by COPE, chaired by the JVP Parliamentarian Sunil Handunneththi, was taking place from 06.05.2016 to 28.10.2016, is now being revealed as an international level slander.
At the media briefing, Mr. Senasinghe said he took telephone calls to Arjun Aloysius to get information for the booklet “Eththa Neththa’ he wrote to ascertain there hadn’t been any fraud in the bond issuance and asked how else he could get information.
State Minister Senasinghe would have written the book on 27th June or around the time which is a time before the general election was held. However, the 62 telephone calls exchanged between State Minister Senasinghe and Arjun Aloysius had taken place while the decisive investigation by COPE chaired by Parliamentarian Sunil Handunneththi was being carried out during the period 06.05.2016 to 28.10.2016.
The UNP Parliamentarian Velu Kumar who was a member of COPE resigned from his membership on 07.07.2016 and State Minister Sujeewa Senasinghe was appointed for the vacancy created on the same day. This was after one year he published the book.
It is also stated that during the period 04.07.2015 to 03.03.2017 there had been 227 telephone calls exchanged between State Minister Sujeewa Senasinghe and Arjun Aloysius.
According to State Minister Sujeewa Senasinghe, he has acted to save the UNP. The party has to be saved only if the leaders and members have committed errors. UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe too said, after appearing before the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Bond Issuance, that errors had been committed.
In such an environment attempting to save bond fraudsters and the UNP leaders who were party to such crimes and coming out with slanders after everything has been revealed would further expose the guilty.

Udayanga’s FR against FCID officer re-fixed for support

A Fundamental Rights petition filed by former Russian Ambassador Udayanga Weeratunga seeking an Interim Order to recall the warrant issued for his arrest by Colombo Fort Magistrate was yesterday re-fixed for support on December 5.
The matter was not taken up for support on the basis that bench was not properly constituted.
On October 20 last year, the Colombo Fort Magistrate issued a warrant written in English through the Interpol for the arrest of Udayanga Weeratunga, a first cousin of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
This is over alleged financial fraud that is alleged to have taken place in procuring seven MiG-27 ground attack crafts for the Sri Lanka Air Force (SLFA).
Weeratunga had filed this petition through his mother-in-law Latha Indrani, his power of attorney holder.
In his petition, Weeratunga stated that he is currently residing in Mekhanizatoriv Street Kiev, Ukraine and sought an Interim Order restraining the Central Bank's Financial Intelligence Unit Director from suspending his bank accounts and continuing to suspend his bank accounts.
The petitioner stated that the seventh respondent, an FCID Chief Inspector had moved Magistrate’s Court for a warrant for his arrest.
The petitioner sought a declaration from the Court that the Chief Inspector infringed the petitioner’s Fundamental Rights guaranteed in terms of Articles 11, 12(1) and 13 of the constitution. The petitioner further said the Director of the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Central Bank has infringed his Fundamental Rights guaranteed in the constitution by the purported decision to suspend debit transactions of the bank accounts in contravention of the provisions of the Financial Transaction Reporting Act No. 6 of 2006.
In his complaint to the FCID, journalist Iqbal Athas stated that he had written several articles regarding the financial irregularities that had taken place in procuring four Mig-27 aircraft at a higher price.
He told the police that these ground attack aircraft had been manufactured between 1980 and 1983. He said financial irregularities had taken place during the transaction between Sri Lank and Ukraine.
President's Counsel Manohara de Silva appeared for the petitioner. Additional Solicitor General Yasantha Kodagoda PC appeared for the Attorney General. 

Reducing price of beer is a blunder!


2017-11-23

The Presidential Task Force on Drug Prevention is the premier Sri Lankan interlocutor for evidence-based policy measures and community-based interventions to prevent and reduce harm caused by alcohol and other drugs. This institution comes under the purview of President Maithripala Sirisena. 
  • There is allocation from the Budget for tourist guest houses to sell beer without licences
  • The official tourist receipts for 2016 were estimated to be Rs. 512,293 million
  • The number of tourists who claimed that they had enjoyed alcoholic beverages was very low
The Director to the President, Presidential Task Force, Dr. Samantha Kumara Kithalawaarachchi, made his comments in response to the Budget 2018, presented by Minister of Finance and Media, focusing on the reduction of tax on beer. According to Budget 2018 beer will enjoy a 40 percent reduction in tax. There is also an allocation from the Budget for tourist guest houses to sell beer without possessing licences. This proposal totally contradicts Government policy as envisaged by the Presidential Task Force for Alcohol and Drug Prevention. 
The Minister has claimed the following to justify this decision-
  • 49 percent, or 1 in 2 alcohol users in Sri Lanka use Kassippu,   
  • In other countries the majority of alcohol users use beer unlike Sri Lanka where the majority use spirits therefore beer prices should be reduced,   
  • Alcohol should be freely available to become a ‘modern’ country, a country which is still not in the stone age or (galyugaya),   
  • If we increase the price of spirits instead of decreasing the price of beer to move those using spirits to using beer, Sri Lanka will become like Saudi Arabia,   
  • Taxation on alcohol should be based on the alcohol content of the beverage and therefore the taxation on beer should be reduced.   
The Presidential Task Force on drug prevention conducted a survey this year, in collaboration with the Rajarata University to ascertain preferences of tourists visiting Sri Lanka and their attitude towards alcohol policies implemented in the country. 

According to recent Central Bank reports, tourism is placed in third place bypassing traditional exports, seconding it only to migrant workers and the garment industry. 

In other words, the official tourist receipts for 2016 were estimated to be Rs. 512,293 million as compared to Rs. 405,492 million in 2015, showing an increase of 26 percent.

According to the statistics released by the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority, the numbers had increased to 2,050,832 in 2016. There is a 14 percent increase compared to the figures of 2015.

 Thus it’s clear that tourism plays an important role as one of the core sources of foreign exchange earners in Sri Lanka’s economy and this growth should be maintained for national development. 
There were many proposals to promote Sri Lanka as an attractive place for tourists in the lines of development of infrastructure, facilities and services available. 

No access to alcohol   

Another proposal suggested that the access that tourists have to alcohol should be increased by reducing tax and increasing access points. This proposal highlighted that the majority of tourists are experiencing difficulties with no access to alcohol, hence the country may lose tourists in the future. However this is a speculative statement and lacks evidence based information.

Hence this study was conducted to collect firsthand evidence from tourists themselves about their preferences and their idea behind visiting Sri Lanka. The study also reveals the perception of foreigners for potential development and improvements to be made in the tourism sector in Sri Lanka. 
The geographical area covered by this study included Anuradhapura, Kandy, Trincomalee, Batticaloa/Passikuda, Negombo, Dambulla, Sigiriya, Galle and Colombo.

The tourists were randomly selected for the survey from hotels, restaurants and other visiting places. Prior to asking questions, they were given a brief description of the nature of the survey.

The participants at the survey numbered 302 (representing both sexes) whose ages ranged between 18 - 78 years. These tourists came from a range of 38 countries. There were citizens from Britain, Netherlands, Australia, France, China, Russia, Poland, Holland, Thailand, Belgium and USA.

Startling fact   

Following inquiries it was found that nearly 90 percent of the tourists were attracted to natural beauty, wildlife, beaches and the opportunities to visit ancient places. In addition, some have enjoyed a variety of spicy food items. But the number of tourists who claimed that they had enjoyed alcoholic beverages was very low. 

According to them the main problems that plagued them were traffic and poor public transport. They also said that they were concerned about diseases and issues related to hygiene. 

The number of tourists who had complains regarding access to alcohol was less than 3 percent. However as much as 12 percent reported on issues relating to harassment by street vendors, problems with guides and tuk tuk drivers, lack of facilities to purchase tickets, difficulty in obtaining correct information when visiting places due to communication problems and the unavailability of basic facilities such as washrooms.

More than 88 percent of tourists were optimistic about their next visit to Sri Lanka, but the rest weren’t. Those who were optimistic of their next visit stated that they were attracted by the natural beauty, beaches, wildlife, history and the country’s culture. A few were avaricious of Sri Lankan cuisine. 

Most of the participants suggested developing roads and transport facilities and a few wanted safety assurances apart from improvements in hotel accommodation. Only 7 percent suggested they wished to have better access to alcohol.

Public smoking and drinking  

When asked for their opinion on tobacco and alcohol policies in Sri Lanka, particularly about the ban on public smoking and drinking, more than 90 percent of them gave their approval. 
Based on the findings of this survey, it is quite clear that tourists who visit Sri Lanka don’t consider alcohol or the availability of alcohol as a cause for their visits. 

Illicit liquor 

The Presidential Task Force on drug prevention is also working closely with the Police and the Divisional Secretariats spread across the  country to monitor the use of ‘kassippu’ (illicit liquor) and they are presented with relevant records quarterly. According to these observations, it is very clear that the use of kassippu has significantly dropped. 

No person consuming Kassippu would start drinking beer and by increasing the availability of alcohol for tourists and simplifying the liquor licence system would only cause local alcohol consumption to increase. Beer is the gateway to hard drugs. Reduction in the price of beer will only result in increase in both the production and consumption of the product.

This measure will not reduce the consumption of hard liquor and illicit brew or Kassippu, as people from different ages and social strata consume different brews. Increased alcohol consumption is a burden to a country as the Government has to end up spending more than the revenue it collects by way of taxes on alcohol on treating people afflicted with alcohol related diseases.

Introducing the measure to cut down the consumption of hard liquor and reduce the production of illicit brew such as Kassippu, the Finance Minister in 1996, reduced the price of beer considerably.

As a result of this short-sighted policy to reduce the price of beer, the consumption of beer increased by 52.3 percent over the next 10 years. During this time the population increase was only 13.8 percent. Meanwhile, the consumption of arrack also rose and the production of Kassippu too increased. It encouraged young people to drink more beer of higher concentration due to the low cost. The total consumption of beer in 2015 was 126 million litres.

The policy makers of this country should know that alcohol consumption is a major health and social problem. The extent of the damage is reflected in the rising incidence of hospital admissions due to alcohol related diseases, rising incidence of road traffic accidents, violence and homicide, rising incidence of sexual abuse and violence against women and children and the deterioration of moral and spiritual values observed in the society. 

The Government should give priority and more consideration to do the right thing, i.e. by increasing taxes on alcohol and reducing its availability.   

Israeli diplomats get cold shoulder from UK students

While the British government celebrated the centenary of the Balfour Declaration, students demonstrated their support of Palestinian rights. (Bristol-PSC)

Alia Malak -22 November 2017

As Israel and the UK government celebrate 100 years of the Balfour Declaration – marking Britain’s support for the settler project that led to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine – students on British campuses are asserting their support for Palestinian rights.

Last month, dozens of students demonstrated when Michael Freeman, counsellor for civil society affairs at the Israeli embassy in London, visited Bristol.

Students say they opposed Freeman’s visit because of the policies he represents as an Israeli diplomat.

Student protesters engaged with passersby on campus and passed out educational leaflets on Israel’s war crimes. The protest lasted for the entire duration of Freeman’s two-hour event.

Whitewashing

Freeman’s visit to Bristol was part of a series of talks given by Israeli diplomats at universities around the UK. The talks are an attempt by the Israeli embassy to whitewash Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people.

Both Freeman and Mark Regev, Israel’s ambassador to the UK, recently scheduled events on campuses across the country.

This is part and parcel of a larger project, backed by Israel, of fighting the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions movement and its supporters who run campaigns to end UK corporate and institutional complicity in Israel’s human rights violations.

Students and faculty are uniting in strong opposition to visits by Israeli officials. Regev spoke at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London earlier this year, prompting lively pushback from students and staff, including an “apartheid off campus” event outside his talk, which was attended by hundreds of protesters.

The involvement of both students and staff in opposing the visits of Israeli diplomats demonstrates that this issue is relevant to more than just the student body: It affects all members of the university campus.

At SOAS, university leadership disregarded pressing questions of personal and institutional responsibility regarding Regev’s presence on campus. Valerie Amos, the university’s director, refused to intervene despite receiving a letter signed by more than 100 SOAS staff calling on her to do so.

Another stop on the Israeli embassy’s tour was the University of Manchester. After the student union in Manchester voted to support a BDS resolution last year, students and faculty had joined together in a divestment campaign focusing on the university’s ties with companies complicit in Israel’s crimes.

The students and staff say they started this academic year with a letter-writing campaign to confront the university over its cooperation with the Israeli embassy in attempting to shut down a student event.

Then it was announced that a “high-profile speaker,” later revealed to be Regev, would be attending a ticketed event to celebrate the centenary of the Balfour Declaration on 31 October.

The students say they immediately started organizing their own event against the Balfour celebrations, which took place on the same day.

“Move away from imperialism”

Adie Nistelrooy, a Manchester-based solidarity activist, said that organizers called on people to contact university officials, urging them to cancel the event.

“This created pressure from inside the institution as well as from outside,” Nistelrooy told The Electronic Intifada.

The strength of the movement in Manchester was made clear a few days before the demonstration when it was announced by organizers that the Balfour celebration event was being moved from the University of Manchester to a Hilton hotel.

Even after this victory, students continued to mobilize. Organizers say that protesters took part in a march from the university to the Manchester Hilton hotel on 31 October.

Students, members of the Palestinian community and Palestine solidarity groups from around the country took part.

Community support for the demonstration was obvious as onlookers spontaneously joined in the march as it went past, organizers told The Electronic Intifada.

“The protest was bigger than the actual event,” Huda Ammori, a Manchester student and Palestine solidarity activist, explained. “When the Israeli embassy organizes these events, it’s an opportunity for us to mobilize.”

Justified

Students and staff say they are justified in opposing events with Israeli diplomats on campus. A key aim of these visits is to normalize Israel’s regime of apartheid and control over Palestinians, they explain.

Students who have protested the Israeli embassy’s presence on campuses argue that the perspectives presented by state representatives are not just harmless opinions or points of view; they have a devastating effect in the real world.

They say that the more Israel cultivates a positive image of itself overseas, the easier it is for the government to consolidate and continue the climate of violence it has created for Palestinians both in Israel and the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Palestinian students and staff at UK universities contend that the presence of Israeli state representatives on campus ignores their lived experience of Israeli state violence, which encroaches on every aspect of Palestinian life.

Students say that they are responding to the academic boycott call made by Palestinians, which targets the Israeli state, its official representatives and also its complicit education institutions.

UK students have demonstrated that they are committed to defending Palestinian rights and are poised to organize and resist the next time an Israeli official comes to a university campus.

Alia Malak is based in London and is the coordinator of the Student Palestine Solidarity Project.
 

EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s 'ultimate deal' seen as ultimatum to Palestinians


Crown prince offered Mahmoud Abbas more cash for new state as Saudi Arabia pushes for Israeli support against Iran, say sources

US President Donald Trump before a meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas at United Nations General Assembly in September 2017 in New York (AFP)

Wednesday 22 November 2017
JERUSALEM/WASHINGTON - A US team is in the process of finalising President Donald Trump’s "ultimate deal" for peace between Palestinians and Israel, a Western diplomat and Palestinian officials have told Middle East Eye.
The diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the issue with the media, said that the deal will include:
  • The establishment of a Palestinian state, whose borders will include the Gaza Strip as well as Areas A, B and parts of Area C in the West Bank (see map below)
  • Donor countries to provide $10bn to establish the state and its infrastructure including an airport, a sea port in Gaza, housing, agriculture, industrial areas and new cities
  • The status of Jerusalem and the issue of returning refugees to be postponed until later negotiations
  • Final negotiations to include regional peace talks between Israel and Arab countries, led by Saudi Arabia
The diplomat said that Jared Kushner, Trump’s special adviser and head of his team for the peace process, visited Saudi Arabia recently and briefed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who is also known as MBS, about the plan.
Kushner also asked the Saudis to help persuade Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to accept the plan, which will be officially presented in early 2018.
The diplomat, who is very close to the US team, said bin Salman had met with Abbas in early November to brief him on the proposal. The crown prince asked the Palestinian president to accept the plan and be positive about it.
“MBS is very enthusiastic about the plan,” the diplomat said, “and he is eager to see a peace deal between the Palestinians and Israel first, then between Israel and the Arab countries, as a first step in forming a coalition between Saudi Arabia and Israel to counter the Iranian threat.”

Saudi need for support against Iran

The diplomat said that bin Salman told Kushner he is willing to invest large amounts of capital in the deal, and would give the Palestinian leadership the necessary incentives for a positive response.
Palestinian officials told MEE that Abbas met with bin Salman during his recent visit to Riyadh, which began on 8 November. There, he offered to increase Saudi financial support to the Palestinian Authority almost three-fold from $7.5m a month to $20m. 
'This is Netanyahu’s plan and he sold it the US team and they are trying to sell it to the Palestinians and Arabs'
- Palestinian official
Bin Salman told Abbas that the Iranian threat to Arab countries is serious, sources close to the talks said, and that Saudi was in serious need of support from the United States and Israel to face its "existential conflict" with Tehran. “We cannot have Israel on our side before solving the Palestinian-Israel conflict," the source reported the crown prince as saying.
One Palestinian official said: “President Abbas believes the plan could be okay only if we add to it the words '1967 borders'. We are willing to give Israel time if they are willing to give us land.
"We told them, if the plan states clearly that the 'ultimate deal' is to have Palestinian statehood [based] on the 1967 borders with a slight land swap, [then] we will accept the first stage of it, which [is ] establishing a state with provisional borders.”
The official, who is close to the talks, said the only Palestinian concerns were that Israel will make the provisional deal final.
Another Palestinian official said Abbas believes the plan, which was drafted by Kushner and Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt, initially originated from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “This is Netanyahu’s plan and he sold it the US team and they are trying to sell it to the Palestinians and Arabs,” the source said.

Palestinian DC office shut down

The official added that the Palestinians are now expecting more pressure from Washington and Arab capitals.
“The US is waving sanctions against the Palestinians if they reject the plan, like shutting down the PLO mission office in Washington DC and stopping the financial aid to the Palestinian Authority,” the source said.
That threat came to pass this week as the US shut down the office of the Palestinian representative in Washington and the Palestinians in turn froze all meetings with the US, officials said on Tuesday.
READ MORE ►
"What is the use of holding any meetings with them when they close our office? Our meetings begin from our office, and the arrangements are there," Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki told AFP.
The Palestinian official said that in 2000, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and then Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah told PLO leader Yasser Arafat: "We accept only what the Palestinians accept."
“At the Camp David Talks in 2000, the Arabs supported late leader Yasser Arafat in facing the US pressure. But now, no one is standing alongside us.
"But now the Saudi king is drowning in the conflict with Iran in Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq and the Egyptian president is drowning in Sinai."
Relations between Saudi and Israel have eased during the past few months. Recent reports have suggested that a Saudi prince travelled to Tel Aviv for a secret meeting with senior Israeli officials. 
On 16 November, Gadi Eizenkot, Israel's chief of general staff, said that the country was ready to share “intelligence information” with Saudi Arabia and that both countries had a common interest in opposing Iran.

'Empty words'

But many Palestinians say they would reject any Saudi-led peace deal which compromised on the right of return of Palestinian refugees and sought to "normalise" Arab relations with Israel.
A Palestinian security officer stands by a mural of Yasser Arafat in Ain el-Helweh (AFP)
"This will never be accepted by any Palestinian, inside Palestine, outside Palestine, anywhere," Major General Sobhi Abu Arab, the Palestinian national security chief in the Ain el-Helweh refugee camp in Sidon, Lebanon, told MEE.
READ MORE ►
"This is not a new idea. It is brought up every so often and Abu Mazen [Abbas] would never agree to it."
"These are empty words that have been used for decades."
Zafer al-Khateeb, a Palestinian activist inside Ain el-Helweh, said that Israel was seeking to use the opportunity with Saudi Arabia to "break the taboo on Arab normalisation with Israel".
"They know the right of return cannot be removed. That is not to say there isn’t something being cooked. There is certainly work being done, but until now it is unclear and there is no reality on the ground," he said.
This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.

Ratko Mladić convicted of war crimes and genocide at UN tribunal

Former Bosnian Serb army commander sentenced to life imprisonment more than 20 years after Srebrenica massacre

Profile: the ‘warlike youth’ turned Balkan war criminal


Ratko Mladić, the 'butcher of Bosnia' – video profile

and Wednesday 22 November 2017
The former Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladić, nicknamed the ‘butcher of Bosnia’, has been sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

More than 20 years after the Srebrenica massacre, Mladic was found guilty at the United Nations-backed international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague of 10 offences involving extermination, murder and persecution of civilian populations.

As he entered the courtroom, Mladić gave a broad smile and thumbs up to the cameras – a gesture that infuriated relatives of the victims. His defiance shifted into detachment as the judgment began: Mladić played with his fingers and nodded occasionally, looking initially relaxed.

The verdict was disrupted for more than half an hour when he asked the judges for a bathroom break. After he returned, defence lawyers requested that proceedings be halted or shortened because of his high blood pressure. The judges denied the request. Mladić then stood up shouting “this is all lies” and “I’ll fuck your mother”. He was forcibly removed from the courtroom. The verdicts were read in his absence.

 Mladić removed from court after angry outburst – video

Mladić, 74, was chief of staff of Bosnian Serb forces from 1992 until 1996, during the ferocious civil wars and ethnic cleansing that followed the break-up of the Yugoslav state.

The one-time fugitive from international justice faced 11 charges, two of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and four of violations of the laws or customs of war. He was cleared of one count of genocide, but found guilty of all other charges. The separate counts related to “ethnic cleansing” operations in Bosnia, sniping and shelling attacks on besieged civilians in Sarajevo, the massacre of Muslim men and boys at Srebrenica and taking UN personnel hostage in an attempt to deter Nato airstrikes.

The trial in The Hague, which took 530 days across more than four years, is arguably the most significant war crimes case in Europe since the Nuremberg trials, in part because of the scale of the atrocities involved. Almost 600 people gave evidence for the prosecution and defence, including survivors of the conflict.

Delivering the verdicts, judge Alphons Orie said Mladić’s crimes “rank among the most heinous known to humankind and include genocide and extermination”.

Orie dismissed mitigation pleas by the defence that Mladić was of “good character”, had diminished mental capacity and was in poor physical health.

Relatives of victims flew into the Netherlands to attend the hearing, determined to see Mladić receive justice decades after the end of the war in which more than 100,000 people were killed.

Among those present was Fikret Alić, the Bosnian who was photographed as an emaciated prisoner behind the wire of a prison camp in 1992. “Justice has won and the war criminal has been convicted,” he said after the verdict. Others were reduced to tears by the judge’s description of past atrocities.


Fikret Alić holds a copy of Time magazine that featured his emaciated image on its cover in 1992. Photograph: Phil Nijhuis/AP

Mladić was one of the world’s most wanted fugitives before his arrest in 2011 in northern Serbia. He was transferred to the ICTY in the Netherlands, where he refused to enter a plea. A not guilty plea was eventually entered on his behalf. Through much of the trial in The Hague, he was a disruptive presence in court, heckling judges and on one occasion making a cut-throat gesture towards the mother of one of the 8,000 victims of the 1995 Srebrenica massacre.

Mladić was acquitted of only one charge, that of genocide in Bosnian municipalities outside Srebrenica. The chamber ruled that although he was part of a joint criminal enterprise to carry out mass killings there, which represented crimes against humanity, they did not rise to the level of genocide because the victims did not represent a substantial proportion of the Bosnian Muslim population of those municipalities.

The Bosnian Serb political leader, Radovan Karadžić, was also found not guilty of genocide in the municipalities. That tribunal verdict in 2016 triggered protests from Bosniaks, who wanted the court to acknowledge that genocide was committed across Bosnia, not just in Srebrenica.

In evaluating Mladić’s culpability for genocide, the court pointed to his command and control of the Bosnian Serb army and interior ministry forces, which carried out almost all of the executions, his presence in the area, and his frequent remarks about how the country’s Muslims could “disappear”.

Orie said: “The chamber found that the only reasonable inference was that the accused intended to destroy the Bosnian Muslim of Srebrenica as a substantial part of the protected group of Muslims in Bosnia Herzegovina.

“Accordingly, the chamber found the accused intended to carry out the Srebrenica joint criminal enterprises through the commission of the crime of genocide and was a member of the Srebrenica joint criminal enterprise.”

Once Mladic has exhausted any appeals, he could, theoretically, be sent to the UK to serve out the rest of his life behind bars. Britain is one of the countries that has signed up to the tribunal’s agreement on the enforcement of sentences.

The UK has hosted other Serbian convicts sent on from the ICTY. In 2010, Radislav Krstić who was convicted at the Hague in 2001 for his part in the Srebrenica massacre, had his throat slashed in his cell at Wakefield prison by three Muslim inmates intent on revenge.

The former Liberian warlord Charles Taylor is also serving out his 50 year prison term in a UK jail.
Mladic will remain in the UN detention centre at Scheveningen, near the Hague, in the meantime. Any appeal will be dealt with by the successor court, the UN Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals.

The hearing, broadcast live, was followed closely in Bosnia. The Bosnian prime minister, Denis Zvizdić, said the verdict “confirmed that war criminals cannot escape justice regardless of how long they hide”.

In Lazarevo, the Serbian village where Mladić was arrested in 2011, residents dismissed the guilty verdicts as biased. One, Igor Topolic, said: “All this is a farce for me. He [Mladić] is a Serbian national hero.”

Mladić’s home village of Bozinovici retains a street named after the former general, where he is praised as a symbol of defiance and national pride.

The trial is one of the last to be heard by the ICTY, which is to be dissolved at the end of the year.

 People, including victims, protest in front of the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) prior to the verdict Photograph: John Thys/AFP/Getty Images

After the ruling, Serge Brammertz, the ICTY’s chief prosecutor, said it was not a verdict against all Serb people. “Mladić’s guilt is his and his alone,” he said.

Mladić’s defence lawyer, Dragan Ivetic, announced that he would appeal against the convictions.
In Geneva, the UN’s high commissioner for human rights, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, described Mladić as the “epitome of evil” and said his conviction was a “momentous victory for justice”.

With Saudi Blockade Threatening Famine in Yemen, U.S. Points Finger at Iran

White House pushes to release intel blaming Iran for attacks on Saudi Arabia

Shiite Huthi rebels raise their weapons during a rally in support of Palestinians in Sanaa on July 1, 2016. (Mohammed Huwais/AFP/Getty Images)Shiite Huthi rebels raise their weapons during a rally in support of Palestinians in Sanaa on July 1, 2016. (Mohammed Huwais/AFP/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.BY , NOVEMBER 22, 2017, 2:34 PM

The White House is pressing to declassify intelligence allegedly linking Iran to short-range ballistic missile attacks by Yemeni insurgents against Saudi Arabia, part of a public relations blitz aimed at persuading America’s U.N. counterparts that Tehran is helping to fuel the country’s conflict.
The effort to cast blame on Iran comes at a time when the U.S.-backed Saudi military coalition in Yemen is facing mounting international condemnation for enforcing a blockade on vital ports that threatens to plunge the country into a massive famine.

The declassification push is part of a broader U.S. bid to isolate Tehran in the U.N. Security Council, and potentially to provide a justification for enforcing sanctions or imposing new penalties against Tehran. It marks a surprising recognition by President Donald Trump — who dismissed the United Nations as a feckless talk shop during his presidential campaign — that the world body is critical for rallying international support.

The U.S. campaign to highlight Tehran’s violation of U.N. sanctions suffered a setback earlier this month,when a U.N. panel of experts disclosed it has received no proof that Iran furnished Yemen’s Shiite Houthi insurgents with the missile it fired on Nov. 4 at an airport near the Saudi capital of Riyadh.

The attack was cited earlier this month by Saudi Arabia as a justification for imposing a blockade on Houthi-controlled ports and the airport in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, a move condemned by aid agencies as paving the way to a humanitarian catastrophe. Saudi Arabia announced Wednesday that it would reopen the port in Hodeida and the airport in Sanaa to humanitarian aid deliveries. But the move was criticized by the International Rescue Committee as a half measure which will continue to block the import of vital commercial goods and fuel.

Critics said the White House campaign to release more information about suspected Iranian arms deliveries appears calculated to deflect attention from international — and congressional — outrage directed at Riyadh over the blockade.

“They desperately want to change the conversation away from starving children to Iranian bad guys,” said Bruce Riedel, a retired CIA officer who advised four presidents on the Middle East. “But I’m skeptical it’s going to work. Because the imagery of kids that you see on the BBC or 60 Minutes is a lot more powerful than the imagery of a declassified document.”

But Trump administration officials came to Saudi Arabia’s defense, saying Riyadh had cause to be concerned about arms smuggling: “How would countries react if a ballistic missile hit your capital?” said one senior U.S. official, who asked that their name not be used.

In Washington, U.S. national security officials on Monday sought to persuade U.N. diplomats and members of the expert panel that Iran is arming Yemen’s Shiite Houthis. Meanwhile, a U.N. team traveled to Riyadh this week for a briefing and to see missile debris.

The United Nations had demanded Saudi Arabia provide more access to technical information and other evidence from the missile attacks. But the Saudi government, worried about admitting vulnerabilities in its missile defenses and accustomed to secrecy, was initially reluctant to release more information on the attacks, according to U.S. officials.

A senior Trump administration official told Foreign Policy that “disclosing things like this was new for them.”

For years, Iran was prohibited by numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions from developing, testing or transferring ballistic missiles on the grounds that they could be used to advance what the U.S. and other Western powers feared was a clandestine nuclear weapons program.

But under the terms of a landmark 2015 nuclear pact, the missile prohibition was replaced by an appeal to Tehran to voluntarily halt the development of ballistic missiles that can be used to deliver a nuclear payload. Iran, which has long denied it intends to produce nuclear weapons, has taken that as a green light to advance its missile program.

The Trump administration has been struggling for months to identify ways to apply greater diplomatic pressure on Tehran, which is supporting a network of Shiite militias in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, to expand its influence and power in the region. But the administration’s effort to rally international support for its policies on Iran has been stymied by Trump’s threats to abandon the Iran nuclear deal.

A chief goal of U.S. policymakers is to convince U.N. experts to conclude Iran violated the arms embargo in an upcoming report in December to the Security Council by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres. That, they hope, could pave the way for the United States to secure support from key allies, particularly European powers that are deepening economic ties with Tehran, for a tougher stance with Iran.

U.S. officials say they are convinced that Iran can be linked to the Nov. 4 missile strike, which Saudi Arabia claims it intercepted on approach to the King Khalid International Airport near the Saudi capital of Riyadh. Less than a week after the November airport attack, the U.S. Air Force’s top officer at Central Command, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey L. Harrigian, said the missile bore “Iranian markings.”

Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said earlier this month that the Houthis also fired an Iranian Qiam 1 short-range missile in a July attack on an oil refinery in Yanbu.

Yemen’s military has retained prewar stockpiles of SCUD-B and Hwasong-6 missiles, some of which have been modified, according to the U.N. report.

The U.N. panel raised the prospect of an Iranian role in Yemen’s missile program, writing that it could not rule out the possibility that Yemen may be receiving technical advice from “foreign missile specialists,” or that its missiles may have been altered to extend their range.

It also cited the discovery of a shipment of industrial equipment, including “corrosion resistant storage tanks virtually identical to those used to support SCUD SRBM [short-range ballistic missile] operations.” The equipment, according to the panel, “almost certainly originated in the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

The Houthis have claimed their attacks on the airport and refinery employed a missile called a Burqan 2H, which is akin to a SCUD C missile. But the range of the typical SCUD C only has roughly a 700-kilometer (435-mile) range and yet the targets hit in the recent attacks were more than 200 kilometers beyond that distance, U.S. officials said.

The senior administration official told Foreign Policy that missile debris recovered after the airport and refinery attacks resembled an Iranian short-range ballistic missile, the Qiam. The official showed unclassified photos to FP that noted the missile debris had the same exhaust ports and other design features that matched the Iranian weapon. Scud missiles have fins, but tail sections of the missiles recovered in Saudi Arabia had no fins — another similarity to the Qiam design.

“It doesn’t physically resemble the SCUD C,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The photos also showed a fan jet recovered from the missile debris bearing the logo of an Iranian defense company, Shahid Bagheri Industries, the official said.

The panel of experts, however, had said in its report earlier this month that supporting evidence shared with them was insufficient to prove Iranian involvement. “The supporting evidence provided in these briefings is far below that required to attribute this attack to a Qiam-1 SRBM,” the panel wrote in their report.

In addition to the recovered debris, the United States has “other” unspecified intelligence to help make the case that the missiles were Iran-made, and plans to share some of that intelligence with the U.N. team, the U.S. official said.

“The Iranians have consistently said there’s no Iranians in Yemen, that these are really just clever Houthis that paid attention in science class,” the official.

The evidence from the recent missile attacks proved otherwise, the official said, and the declassification effort presented “an opportunity to show European allies what the Iranians are doing.”

Apart from the ballistic missile attacks, Trump administration officials say Iran is allegedly behind improvements in Houthi surface-to-surface missiles as well as other weapons, making the projectiles more precise.

Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry said investigators studying the intercepted missile uncovered evidence proving “the role of Iranian regime in manufacturing them.”

There is “ample proof, going back more than a year, or Iran providing arms to the Houthis,” said one former State Department foreign service officer, who like other U.S. officials speaking on the issue, ask that their name not be used. “There is no credibility to the Houthis’ claim they made the missiles themselves.”

Experts said they welcomed the Trump administration decision to pursue its case for Iranian involvement to the United Nations, saying it would make it easier to secure European support for a tougher line on Iran.

The senior U.S. official said there were other clues suggesting Iran’s hand in the Yemen conflict. A Houthi boat captured off the Yemeni coast by the Emiratis, who are part of the Saudi-led coalition waging war against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, had a computer system that seemed to be manufactured in Iran.

The boat’s control system included circuit boards that had markings for FHM Electronics, an Iranian joint-stock company in Tehran, the official said. The boat’s autopilot software resembled software advertised in the Iranian firm’s catalog, and contained various GPS coordinates including one corresponding with the location of a known Iranian Revolutionary Guard research organization in Tehran.

The diplomatic initiative is playing out against a backdrop of rising criticism in Congressand abroad of the U.S.-backed Saudi coalition. Two days after Nov. 4 strike, the coalition announced it had shut all land, air, and sea ports in Yemen to halt the smuggling of arms into Yemen. But the blockade, which triggered a famine warning from the U.N. early warning system, prevented all food, medicine, fuel, and other goods from entering the Houthi controlled port of Hodeida, and has sparked international condemnation.

“#Yemen risks starving to death,” the International Committee of the Red Cross warned on Twitter Tuesday. “70% of the population is reliant on humanitarian aid — that’s not getting in.”

The United States, United Kingdom, and other Saudi allies have “only weeks to avoid being complicit in a famine of biblical proportions,” Jan Egeland,  a senior U.N. advisor on humanitarian issue and the secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, tweeted. “Lift the blockade now.”

Lebanon's PM Hariri shelves resignation, easing crisis

Saad al-Hariri who suspended his decision to resign as prime minister talks at the presidential palace in Baabda, Lebanon November 22, 2017. REUTERS/Aziz Taher

Ellen FrancisLaila Bassam-NOVEMBER 22, 2017 

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Lebanon’s Saad al-Hariri on Wednesday shelved his decision to resign as prime minister at the request of President Michel Aoun, easing a crisis that had deepened tensions in the Middle East.

Hariri made his announcement after returning to Beirut for the first time since he quit abruptly on Nov. 4 in a broadcast from Saudi Arabia. Top Lebanese officials have said Riyadh forced him to quit and held him in the kingdom. Riyadh and Hariri deny this.

At the presidential palace near Beirut, Hariri said he hoped his move would lead to “a responsible dialogue ... that deals with divisive issues and their repercussions on Lebanon’s relations with Arab brothers.”
Hariri said all Lebanese sides must commit to keeping the country out of regional conflicts, a reference to the Iran-backed Hezbollah political and military movement. Hezbollah’s regional military role has greatly alarmed Saudi Arabia, Hariri’s long-time ally.

“I presented today my resignation to President Aoun and he urged me to wait before offering it and to hold onto it for more dialogue about its reasons and political background, and I showed responsiveness,” he said in a televised statement.

The resignation had shocked even Hariri’s aides. He returned to Lebanon late on Tuesday night after French intervention.

Aoun, a political ally of Hezbollah, had refused to accept the resignation because it happened in “mysterious circumstances” abroad. He had called Hariri a hostage in Riyadh.

REGIONAL RIVALRY

Hariri appeared to express relief that Aoun had not accepted the resignation right away. He thanked Aoun on Wednesday for respecting constitutional norms and “his rejection of departing from them under any circumstances”.

The resignation pitched Lebanon to the forefront of the regional rivalry between Sunni Muslim Saudi Arabia and Shi‘ite Islamist Iran, which backs Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and raised concerns of a protracted crisis.

In his resignation speech, Hariri had cited fear of assassination, and attacked Iran along with Hezbollah for sowing strife in the Arab world.

Hundreds of Hariri supporters packed the streets near his house in central Beirut, waving the blue flag of his Future Movement political party. The Sunni leader told them he would “stay with (them) ... to be a line of defence for Lebanon, Lebanon’s stability and Lebanon’s Arabism”
.
“His presence in the country alone brings stability,” said Manar Akoum, 26, as she stood with the celebrating crowd.

Hariri’s resignation was followed by a steep escalation in Saudi statements against the Lebanese government, which includes Shi‘ite Hezbollah. Riyadh said the government as a whole - not just Hezbollah - had declared war against it.
Saad al-Hariri, who announced his resignation as Lebanon's prime minister from Saudi Arabia reacts as he talks with Lebanese President Michel Aoun while attending a military parade to celebrate the 74th anniversary of Lebanon's independence in downtown Beirut, Lebanon November 22, 2017. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

Western governments including the United States struck a different tone, affirming their support for Hariri and the stability of Lebanon, which hosts 1.5 million Syrian refugees - nearly one in four of the population.

“The United States welcomes the return of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri to Lebanon,” a State Department official said on Wednesday.

Washington is also encouraged by Hariri’s discussions with Aoun and his statement reaffirming his commitment to Lebanon’s stability, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Ahead of his return to Beirut, Hariri had stressed the importance of the Lebanese state policy of staying out of regional conflicts, notably Yemen, where a Saudi-led coalition is battling Iran-backed Houthi fighters.

PRESERVING LEBANESE “COEXISTENCE”

Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, who had also called for Hariri’s return, said on Monday his group was open to “any dialogue and any discussion”. Nasrallah also issued his clearest denial yet of any Hezbollah role in Yemen.

A senior source in a political alliance that includes Hezbollah said Hariri’s move on Wednesday would start a breakthrough in the crisis. “This step is not detached from the framework of a complete solution whose features will appear in the coming days,” the source told Reuters.

Lebanese dollar bonds, which had fallen in response to Hariri’s resignation, gained following Wednesday’s announcement.

A government minister from the United Arab Emirates, a close ally of Saudi Arabia, said Lebanon must implement its policy of keeping out of Middle East conflicts in order to get out of its own crisis as well as regional troubles.

“The main problem facing that is the selective implementation of (this) principle and the functional Iranian role of Hezbollah outside the Lebanese framework,” Anwar Gargash, minister of state for foreign affairs, wrote on Twitter.

Cyprus, where Hariri had briefly stopped on his journey home, said it would attempt to help defuse the crisis.

“Our common objective is stability in Lebanon, stability in our area. Within this context ... the President of the Republic will undertake some initiatives precisely to promote this objective: stability in Lebanon,” Cypriot government spokesman Nikos Christodoulides said.

Hariri took office last year in a power-sharing deal that made Aoun head of state. He arrived in Beirut in time for independence day celebrations on Wednesday morning, taking the premier’s seat alongside Aoun and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.

Hariri said he looked forward to “real partnership with all the political powers, in placing Lebanon’s interests high above any other interests” and preserving coexistence among Lebanese.