Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, October 20, 2017

North Korea threatens Australia with ‘disaster’


shutterstock_644995939-940x580


NORTH KOREA’s regime has issued a warning to Australian lawmakers of a possible “miscalculation” by its staunch ally the United States under President Donald Trump.

In a letter issued to Australia’s parliament, reported by the Sydney Morning Herald on Friday, the Foreign Affairs Committee for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) said it was a nuclear power that would not back down to threats from US President Donald Trump to destroy it.

“If Trump thinks that he would bring the DPRK, a nuclear power, to its knees through nuclear war threat, it will be a big miscalculation and an expression of ignorance,” said a facsimile of the letter, verified by Australia’s foreign ministry.

2017-09-22T173302Z_1023423396_HP1ED9M1CR1HX_RTRMADP_3_UN-ASSEMBLY-AUSTRALIA-1
Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop addresses the 72nd United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 22, 2017. Source: Reuters/Lucas Jackson
“Trump threatened to totally destroy the DPRK … it is an extreme act of threatening to totally destroy the whole world.”

After a visit by Australia’s Foreign Minister Julie Bishop to South Korea last week, Pyongyang warned that Australia faced “disaster” if it continued to “follow the US in imposing military, economic and diplomatic pressure upon the DPRK.”

Titled “Open Letter to Parliaments of Different Countries,” the note said it was sent from North Korea’s Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, to Australia’s Embassy in the same city, as well as to other countries, without naming them.

Tension has soared on the peninsula following a series of weapons tests by North Korea and a string of increasingly bellicose exchanges between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
2017-10-18T234955Z_1669302535_RC13CFADC1E0_RTRMADP_3_NORTHKOREA-MISSILES
North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un visits Ryuwon Footwear Factory in this undated photo released by North Korea’s Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) in Pyongyang on October 19, 2017. Source: KCNA/via Reuters

Trump, in a speech last month at the United Nations, threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea if necessary to defend itself and allies and called the North’s leader Kim Jong Un a “rocket man” on a suicide mission.

The letter calls for “countries loving independence, peace and justice” to discharge their duty and keep “sharp vigilance against the heinous and reckless moves of the Trump administration trying to drive the world into a horrible nuclear disaster.”

.: This letter is evidence the pressure of sanctions being put on North Korea is working. MORE

At a press conference in Sydney, Foreign Minister Bishop said the note was an “unprecedented” communication, noting that it had been sent from the Foreign Affairs committee rather than the state news agency KCNA.

“It is not the way they usually publish their global messages. The collective strategy of imposing maximum diplomatic and economic pressure through sanctions on North Korea is working. This is a response to the pressure,” said Bishop.

“I think that this shows they are feeling desperate, feeling isolated, trying to demonise the US, trying to divide the international community.”

Additional reporting from Reuters.

Matchmaker Merkel seeks awkward three-way embrace

German Chancellor Angela Merkel delivers her speech during a Lower Saxony's Christian Democratic Union's (CDU) regional election campaign rally in Stade, Germany October13, 2017. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer

Thomas Escritt-OCTOBER 20, 2017

BERLIN (Reuters) - German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened what promised to be marathon coalition talks on Friday, hoping to bring three opposing political camps into a stable government despite signs there would be less money to paper over differences. 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel delivers her speech during a Lower Saxony's Christian Democratic Union's (CDU) regional election campaign rally in Stade, Germany October13, 2017. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer
 
Merkel said she was optimistic as she entered talks between her conservative bloc, the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) and the Greens, despite an assessment by her own party that the next government would have less fiscal room than expected.

The outcome of the talks is keenly awaited both at home and across Europe, with many fretting that the European Union could be rudderless with the bloc’s longest-serving leader too busy to grapple with crucial issues like euro zone governance reform.
 
Highlighting the challenge, a report by Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU) found that there would be only 30 billion euros free for new projects over the next four years if parties stuck to their commitment to taking on no new debts.

The shortfall will make all the more difficult the tricky three-way pact, dubbed a “Jamaica” coalition because the three parties’ colours - black, yellow and green - match those of the Jamaican flag, which is untried at national level.

Higher EU contributions as a result of Brexit and lower central bank profits might reduce spending room by some 15 billion euros, according to calculations seen by Reuters, an obstacle to the FDP’s demands for tax cuts or the Greens’ hope for environmental and infrastructure spending.

The talks between Merkel’s conservative bloc, the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) and the Greens are styled as “exploratory”, but negotiators aim to get down to details of tax and budget policy in their first full meeting together.

“There will be many differences,” she said on her arrival at the Berlin talks, adding: “There is readiness on my side to think about this creatively.”

Party delegations each made five-minute presentations before breaking ahead of further discussions due on Tuesday.



German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks during a news conference during a European Union leaders summit meeting in Brussels, Belgium, October 20, 2017. REUTERS/Dario Pignatelli

FDP chief Christian Lindner had earlier said that no matter how good the “atmosphere and seriousness” the parties were far apart on 85 percent of the material to be discussed. After, FDP secretary-general Nicola Beer said she continued to believe there was a “50:50” chance of a Jamaica coalition resulting.

Merkel, weakened by a surging far-right in last month’s national election, needs to make the awkward alliance fly as her previous “grand coalition” partners - the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) - say they want to rebuild in opposition after their worst election result in more than half a century.
“STRANGERS”

Merkel has been able to steer Europe through its euro zone and refugee crises in part due to her dominance at home. Now that dominance is waning - her conservatives last month had their weakest election showing since 1949.

“Voters have given these parties the task of governing,” wrote newspaper Die Welt. “These possible partners should not be giving the impression that they are inching warily toward each other like strangers in a crammed lift.”

An Infratest Dimap poll for ARD showed 83 percent of Germans wanted the parties to find a compromise deal.

Merkel, 63, has suffered two further setbacks since the national election: the CDU was defeated in a regional election in Lower Saxony on Sunday, and the party’s premier in the eastern state of Saxony resigned on Wednesday, saying younger, fresher leadership was needed to revitalise the conservatives.

Should the three party groups fail to form a coalition, some in their ranks fear this could lead to public disenchantment and fuel further support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which entered parliament for the first time last month.

If she cannot clinch a three-way coalition pact, Merkel could try to form a minority government, or else call fresh elections - an unprecedented scenario.

Alternatively, she could try to team up again with the SPD. The Social Democrats reject that option, though senior party official Thomas Oppermann has indicated they could reconsider on one condition: Merkel steps aside.

White House under fire for suggesting general's remarks should not be questioned

  • Press secretary calls reporter’s question ‘highly inappropriate’
  • Frederica Wilson says Kelly lied about her during press briefing on Thursday

Frederica Wilson said: ‘I feel sorry for General Kelly. He has my sympathy for the loss of his son. But he can’t just go on TV and lie on me.’ Photograph: Alan Diaz/AP

 and in Washington-Friday 20 October 2017 

The White House has been condemned for attempting to silence the media by warning that it is “highly inappropriate” to challenge the veracity of remarks by a military general.

A reporter on Friday questioned a claim by the White House chief of staff, John Kelly, a retired four-star marine general, that the Democratic congresswoman Frederica Wilson had taken credit for securing funding for an FBI building in Florida.

Chip Reid, a CBS News correspondent, said during the daily press briefing: “He was wrong yesterday in talking about getting the money. The money was secured before she came into Congress.”

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, replied coldly: “If you want to go after Gen Kelly, that’s up to you. But I think that if you want to get into a debate with a four-star marine general, I think that that’s something highly inappropriate.”

Reid’s follow-up question was ignored and the implication – from a democratically elected civilian government – that a military general was beyond criticism was troubling to many.

Perry O’Brien, a former army medic who served in Afghanistan, said: “It’s just another example of the administration hiding behind the uniform of others. That’s why it’s so unfortunate to see someone like Gen Kelly enable that and jump on the grenade that Trump threw.”

O’Brien, organising director of Common Defense, a group of veterans against Trump, added: “When you say, ‘How dare you criticise a general?’, how about [former Trump national security adviser] Gen Michael Flynn, who was the first to resign after we learned they were colluding with foreign powers?
I don’t think most generals would say a star on your shoulder makes you immune from criticism.”

Kelly appeared at the White House podium on Thursday, to defend Trump against the charge that he caused offence during a call with the widow of Sgt La David Johnson, one of four US soldiers killed in Niger earlier this month by Islamic State fighters. Wilson heard the call and criticised Trump for disrespecting Johnson’s widow, Myeshia.

While defending the president, Kelly – whose son Robert was killed in Afghanistan in 2010 – accused Wilson of “grandstanding” in a 2015 speech by saying she was instrumental in getting funding for an FBI building in Florida and took care of her constituents because she got the money. Wilson denied the charge and video evidence appeared to support her account.
 
 John Kelly rebukes Trump critics over military deaths – video
Kelly stood by his accusation, Sanders said on Friday. “Gen Kelly said he was stunned that Representative Wilson made comments at a building dedication honouring slain FBI agents about her own actions in Congress, including lobbying former president Obama on legislation,” she said.
Advertisement

“As Gen Kelly pointed out, if you’re able to make a sacred act like honouring American heroes all about yourself, you’re an ‘empty barrel’. If you don’t understand that reference, I’ll put it a little more simply. As we say in the south: all hat, no cattle.”

Wilson regularly wears a cowboy hat.

Challenged over the video footage of the speech, in which Wilson praises FBI agents, Sanders insisted: “She also had quite a few comments that day that weren’t part of that speech and weren’t part of that video that were also witnessed by many people that were there.”

The press secretary also rejected criticism from Johnson’s mother, Cowanda Jones-Johnson, who supports the accounts of the Trump phone call given by her son’s widow and Wilson.

“Certainly, if the spirit of which those comments were intended were misunderstood, that’s very unfortunate,” Sanders said. “But as the president has said, as Gen Kelly said – who I think has a very deep understanding of what that individual would be going through – his comments were very sympathetic, very respectful. And that was the spirit in which the president intended them. If they were taken any other way, that’s certainly an unfortunate thing.”

 Trump: 'I didn't say what the congresswoman said' – video
According to Wilson, Trump told Johnson’s widow her late husband “knew what he signed up for, but when it happens it hurts anyway”.

Kelly in effect corroborated that account, saying he had counseled Trump on how to make the call by telling him of the morning he was told of his son’s death. Kelly recalled his close friend, Gen Joseph Dunford, telling him his son “was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed”.

“He knew what the possibilities were, because we’re at war,” Kelly said. “That’s what the president tried to say to the four families the other day.”

Trump, however, continues to vehemently deny that he said such words.

“The fake news is going crazy with wacky congresswoman Wilson [Democrat] who was secretly on a very personal call and gave a total lie on content,” he tweeted late Thursday.

Kelly also suggested Wilson had eavesdropped on a highly sensitive call. The congresswoman, a close friend of the Johnson family, pointed out she was in the car when Myeshia Johnson received the call, which was placed on speakerphone.

“I wasn’t listening in,” she told CNN on Friday. “Please don’t characterize it as that.”

Wilson said Trump’s comments were “not a good message to say to anyone who has lost a child at war”.

“You don’t sign up because you think you’re going to die,” she said. “You sign up to serve your country. There’s nothing to misinterpret. He said what he said. I just don’t agree with it. I just don’t agree with that’s what you should say to grieving families.”

Regarding Kelly’s remarks about the FBI field office speech, Wilson said she had not been a member of Congress in 2009, when the funding mentioned by Kelly was secured. “That’s a lie,” she said of Kelly’s characterization. “How dare he?”

She added: “I feel sorry for Gen Kelly. He has my sympathy for the loss of his son. But he can’t just go on TV and lie on me.”

What would happen if Amazon brought 50,000 workers to your city? Ask Seattle.





 Amazon.com has driven an economic boom in Seattle, bestowing more than 40,000 jobs upon a city known for Starbucks coffee and Seahawks fandom. Its growth remade a neglected industrial swath north of downtown into a hub of young workers and fixed the region, along with Microsoft before it, as a premier locale for the Internet economy outside Silicon Valley.

Amazon proposed a second headquarters in the U.S. and these cities are hungry for it. Amazon chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos owns The Washington Post. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)

Xi Jinping Has Quietly Chosen His Own Successor

Meet Chen Miner, the man who has been getting groomed to run China — without anyone in the West seeming to notice.

Chongqing Communist Party Secretary Chen Miner attends the 19th Party Congress in Beijing on Oct. 19. (Lintao Zhang/Getty Images)

Chongqing Communist Party Secretary Chen Miner attends the 19th Party Congress in Beijing on Oct. 19. (Lintao Zhang/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.
BY -
OCTOBER 20, 2017, 1:34 PM

Until recently, Sun Zhengcai, the party secretary of the metropolis of Chongqing, “the Chicago on the Yangtze,” was seen as a possible successor to Xi Jinping. Then, in July, the Communist Party of China launched an investigation against him for corruption, leading to Sun’s dismissal from office and the precipitous end to his political career.

Throughout the Western press, the removal of Sun Zhengcai was treated as conclusive proof that Xi plans to remain in charge after 2022, when term limits and political tradition will require him to give up power. This has been a common trope in the hazy world of Chinese political analysis since at least 2015, when Foreign Policy published “Xi Jinping Forever,” arguing that the Chinese leader would try to extend his rule beyond two terms. A constant stream of articles, especially in the run-up to this week’s 19th National Congress of the Communist Party, has reinforced the consensus that Xi Jinping isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

But Xi’s ambitions have been vastly misunderstood, and Sun’s dismissal is a critical case in point. Xi used Sun’s removal not to aggrandize himself, but rather to quietly designate, in violation of recent tradition, his own desired successor for 2022 — someone whom, for at least the past five years, Xi has managed to groom to carry forward his legacy without attracting too much attention.

Xi has more than half a dozen allies in positions of power throughout China’s provinces — like Li Qiang, the Mongolian Bayanqolu, or Li Xi — any one of whom could have been named as Sun’s successor in Chongqing. But Xi’s choice was striking: He promoted his ally Chen Miner, who was born in 1960. Why is his year of birth so important? Because, based on the traditional retirement age of 68, Chen Miner — unlike Xi’s other prominent allies, who are older — will be able to serve out a double term from 2022, when he will be 62. Were he born even just a year earlier, in 1959, this would have been impossible, as he would have been forced to retire in 2027.

In choosing Chen Miner as the new leader of the metropolis of Chongqing, Xi has sent a broad hint to both the party and the outside world.

 The Communist Party doesn’t hold press conferences to announce successors; it uses signals like this — even if few in the West seem to be able to understand them.

Xi’s privileged treatment of Chen is consistent with their relationship since the early 2000s, when they met in the province of Zhejiang, where Xi was serving as provincial party chief. Chen was the head of the provincial propaganda department, in charge of spreading Xi’s message throughout Zhejiang. In this position, he helped write Xi’s weekly column in the provincial party newspaper for almost four years.

Xi left Zhejiang in March 2007, when he was moved to Shanghai, only seven months before the 17th Party Congress. Shanghai needed a new party chief, because the old one was removed after being investigated for corruption. In promoting Xi to Shanghai, one of China’s largest cities, the party leadership indicated that he was destined for higher office. Indeed, at the 17th Party Congress in October, Xi entered the Politburo Standing Committee, the party’s apex of power, and in March 2008 he was named vice president of China — the definitive sign that he was being groomed to take over in 2012.

Meanwhile, Chen Miner remained behind in Zhejiang, being named vice governor and then becoming an alternate member of the party’s Central Committee at the 2007 Party Congress. He remained vice governor until 2012, the year when Xi was going to become the party’s leader. In January 2012, Chen was promoted to the position of deputy party chief of the province of Guizhou.

At the 2012 Party Congress, where Xi was named general secretary of the party, Chen was promoted as one of the 205 full members of the Central Committee and later appointed governor of Guizhou.
Now in charge of the party, Xi announced the start of an anti-corruption campaign whose intensity surprised every observer. In 2015, the anti-corruption campaign targeted a sitting provincial party chief for the first time: Zhou Benshun, the top official in Hebei. Out of more than two dozen provincial party secretaries, Zhou’s replacement was the party secretary of Guizhou, who left his seat to head to Hebei. Thus Chen was promoted from governor to party secretary — a higher-ranking position — in Guizhou, where he would remain in charge for two more years. This was the first, but not the last time Chen would benefit from the anti-corruption campaign.

Chen’s five-year stint in Guizhou coincided with an acceleration of China’s fight against extreme poverty. Guizhou is one of China’s poorest provinces but has a good track record of producing leaders. Hu Jintao, Xi’s predecessor, was Guizhou’s party chief in the 1980s. There, Chen was tasked with tackling one of Xi Jinping’s most important objectives: the eradication of extreme poverty by 2020. In the process, he made some resounding moves, like convincing Apple to build a data center in Guizhou. Under Chen’s leadership in 2016, Guizhou reported the third-fastest growth among Chinese provinces, with a claimed GDP growth rate of 10.5 percent.

In return, Xi has repeatedly signaled his trust in Chen. This year, every province has chosen its delegates to the 19th Party Congress. Chinese leaders are themselves delegates at the Party Congress. Xi Jinping, for example, was a delegate from Shanghai in both 2007 and 2012. For 10 years he has been living in Beijing, where he was also born. Through his career, he also served in Hebei, Fujian, and Zhejiang. Yet, in April 2017, it was announced with great fanfare in the Chinese press that Xi Jinping would be a delegate from Guizhou. Xi’s only link to this province is, of course, Chen Miner. His election was a clear message to party members and the party leadership that Xi trusts Chen.
This trust was reinforced only three months later, in July, when Sun Zhengcai was removed from his post in Chongqing, being put under investigation for corruption. It was an earth-shattering event, as Sun was one of two possible successors for Xi. Sun was also the first sitting Politburo member put under investigation during Xi’s term.

Until this moment, the anti-corruption campaign had only hunted wounded or retired top officials, instead of the real political heavyweights of the Politburo or the Politburo Standing Committee. (Bo Xilai, the most significant potential rival of Xi’s, fell before the campaign began, thanks to the strange events in the ever-significant town of Chongqing.) Who benefited from Sun’s investigation? Chen Miner, who was promoted to party chief of Chongqing three months before the 19th Congress, just as Xi was promoted to party chief of Shanghai seven months ahead of the 17th Congress. We could call this the 2007 Shanghai playbook, and it was put into action again.

There is now a lot of discussion in the West about the Party Congress: Will Wang Qishan remain on the Politburo Standing Committee, despite the fact that he is supposed to retire, being above the 68-year age limit? Will Xi revive the post of party chairman? Will he have his name enshrined in the party’s constitution, like Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping? Will Xi avoid naming a successor? But very few observers are talking about Chen and his bright prospects. The exaggerations about Xi’s power have obscured the most important question we should be asking: Will Xi manage to install Chen as his successor?

Over the past three decades since Deng Xiaoping retired, Chinese leaders haven’t been able to name their own successor. Jiang Zemin had to accept Hu Jintao and fought to keep his own influence alive in the 2000s as a result. Hu Jintao couldn’t install Li Keqiang as his successor and had to accept Xi Jinping. Now, in a sign of his own strength compared to his predecessors, Xi has purged one heir apparent, replacing him with his chosen ally. Only two possible successors remain: Chen Miner or Hu Chunhua, Hu Jintao’s ally. In normal circumstances, Xi would have been forced to accept Hu Chunhua, who is the provincial party chief of Guangdong. But his plan seems to be to install Chen as China’s next president — in a way that makes it clear he’s beholden to Xi, and which allows Xi to maintain his influence.

Over the past three years, instead of analyzing Chen’s ascent and his prospects, all the attention has been focused on the idea that Xi aims to remain in power after 2022, based on anonymous sources. There are two explanations for these rumors: either it is just speculation and worry on the part of party members who later talked to Western journalists, or the rumors were deliberately planted. If so, they could have been planted by Xi’s enemies, as a smear campaign to accuse him of wanting to become a dictator. Or the rumors could have been started by his allies, to strengthen Xi’s hand in internal party negotiations.

If it were the second explanation, the campaign has failed, as Xi will probably get his way. But if starting the rumors was Xi’s strategy all along, it was a brilliant plan: Everybody worried that Xi might rule beyond 2022, while he carefully groomed Chen Miner. Unlike Hu Chunhua or Sun Zhengcai, Chen hasn’t been a member of the 25-person Politburo, so his chances to become China’s next leader were slimmer. But now, when Xi negotiates with party leaders and proposes Chen as his successor, they may be inclined to say yes, keen to avoid Xi’s hypothetical third term. And so, Xi might do something no Chinese leader since Deng has achieved: designate his own successor and maintain his own influence from behind the scene once he retires.

When the members of the next Politburo Standing Committee step on stage next week, the real question is who will appear first: Chen Miner or Hu Chunhua. If it is Hu, then it is the clearest sign that Xi’s power has been exaggerated. But, if it is Chen, as all the signs indicate, then Xi’s plan over the past five years has indeed worked. And nobody should be surprised when Chen Miner emerges as Xi’s successor — even if he ends up continuing Xi’s agenda and shielding his legacy.

Asia: ‘Dead Wood’ in the Human Rights Industry


We use the term ‘industry’, as there are many NGOs in existence today in which cronyism and nepotism is the rule of the day. The first order of business is to continue to obtain funds, not for the welfare of the people they are supposed to be protecting and assisting, but to pay the salaries and perks of the directors and favoured staff members.

by A Special Correspondent- 
( October 20, 2017, Macao, Sri Lanka Guardian) In the mid-seventies in the business community in Asia a new expression was created: “Dead wood”. It referred to any employee that did not pull his weight and bring in enough business in order to justify his salary and related expenses. The days of ‘the Raj’ where relatives and friends of the management could obtain comfortable positions and actually produce very little in the way of work or business were well and truly over.
Sadly, this is not the case in the human rights ‘industry’. We use the term ‘industry’, as there are many NGOs in existence today in which cronyism and nepotism is the rule of the day. The first order of business is to continue to obtain funds, not for the welfare of the people they are supposed to be protecting and assisting, but to pay the salaries and perks of the directors and favoured staff members. The management use donor funds to employ and keep persons who are relatives and others who are virtually unemployable, but, who support every decision made by the directors as they know, to go against their wishes might well mean the end of a very lucrative contract.
Such is the case in a regional NGO where we see the situation in which a relative of one of the directors is presently employed in a position, the duties of which he is incapable of fulfilling. He was brought in to satisfy the whims of one of the directors and not because of his qualifications. The truly sad thing about this is that a highly qualified individual was dismissed for no valid reason in order to make way for his employment.
In another case, within the same NGO there is another employee who has been promoted time and time again, with enormous increases to his salary when his only claim to fame is that he is well-known to be a ‘yes man’. We will refer to him as Mr. A. Mr. A is person who will support the directors in whatever decision they make because, once again, to go against their wishes might well mean the end of a very comfortable position. As far as his professional expertise is concerned, in the eight years of his employment he has produced very little in the way of work but has been promoted over the heads of more deserving staff because of his fawning behaviour.
Mr. A’s first position in the organisation was that of an intern and at the end of his training period he returned to his home, South Asian country. However, he was fully aware of the potential for an easy and lucrative full-time position. He realised that he could apply for such a position by claiming that his life was in danger. He contacted the then executive director, claimed that he had received threats to his life, and within weeks he was happily ensconced in his new life.
As far as his productivity is concerned, in order to paint an accurate picture, it is necessary to compare him with his colleagues. Most of the other officers were producing two to three products a week. Mr. A’s contribution to the work of the organisation was about six projects a year!
In fact, within the NGO in question, there are several such employees. People whose work records will reveal that they have produced very little effort but who all share the same attitude or are relatives or cronies of the management.
It is a very sad situation indeed, when productive staff are overlooked in favour of such people. Mr. A and others like him can truly be considered ‘dead wood’.

Novelty contact lenses 'can cause sight loss'


They may make you look creepy, but there are risks, experts say
Woman wearing snake eye contact lensesEye irritation caused by novelty contact lensesEye irritation caused by novelty contact lensesWoman wearing snake eye contact lenses
ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS-Novelty lenses can cause serious infections in the eyes
  • 19 October 2017
  • BBCEye experts are warning of the risks of wearing novelty contact lenses at Halloween, saying they can cause nasty infections and scratches to the eyes.
    Cosmetic contact lenses are often sold in joke and fancy-dress shops and on websites, but they come without instructions on safe use.
    Eye-health professionals say novelty lenses should never be shared, stored in tap water or kept in overnight.
    In extreme cases, this can lead to impaired vision and sight loss.
    The Association of Optometrists said its members often saw people with eye problems after wearing novelty lenses.
    It said partygoers should wear only lenses sold with the supervision of a registered eye health professional.
    Mr Badrul Hussain, a consultant ophthalmic surgeon at Moorfields Eye Hospital, said he treated patients every year, including children under 16, who had developed eye conditions after wearing the contact lenses.
    He said eye problems tended to increase around Halloween.
    "Some of the cases we see, like patients sharing lenses with friends, wearing the same pair year after year well past the expiry date, and storing them in tap water, have devastating effects," he said.
    "Not knowing the basics of using contact lenses safely can put you at higher risk of developing painful eye injuries and, in the worst cases, risk of permanent sight loss."

    How to use novelty contact lenses safely

    • Make sure a registered optician checks the lenses fit safely
    • Keep lenses clean by using the recommended contact-lens solution
    • Don't keep lenses in all night
    • Don't swap them or share them with other people
    • Don't let them come into contact with water, in the shower or swimming pool
    • Know the law - it is illegal to sell contact lenses without the supervision of a registered professional

    Thursday, October 19, 2017

    Murdered Tamil journalist Nimalarajan remembered in Jaffna

    Home
    19Oct 2017
    Journalists from the Jaffna Press Club and Jaffna locals held a remembrance on Thursday for the murdered Tamil journalist, Mylvaganam Nimalarajan.
    Mr Nimalarajan, a senior journalist who contributed to the BBC Tamil and Sinhala services, the Tamil daily Virakesari and Sinhala weekly Ravaya, was murdered on October 19th 2000.
    The Committee to Protect Journalists stated shortly after his death:
    “The assailants shot the journalist through the window of his study, where he was working on an article, and threw a grenade into the home before fleeing the premises. The attack occurred during curfew hours in a high-security zone in central Jaffna town.”
    “Local journalists suspect that Nimalarajan's reporting on vote-rigging and intimidation in Jaffna during the recent parliamentary elections may have led to his murder.”
    The government aligned paramilitary group the EPDP are suspected of carrying out the killing.
    Six months after the killing Reporters Without Borders (RSF) expressed deep concern regarding "the serious shortcomings of the police investigation and the Sri Lankan government's apparent unwillingness to shed light".
    In 2004 RSF wrote an open letter to then Sri Lankan President Chandrika Kumaratunge criticising “the failure of the Sri Lankan government to reopen the murder investigation and regretted that the killers have not been tried or punished”. It called on the president to ensure justice in the case, as she herself demanded at the time of the murder,” the statement said.
    Speaking ten years after the murder, Mr Nimalarajan’s father told RSF:
    “This has been 10 years of suffering for our family. But my son’s memory is still alive. I would like people to remember him as a courageous journalist who served his community. The government could relaunch the investigation into my son’s murder if it wanted to. It is a question of political will. We want justice to be done.”

    Pardon and release the 158 Tamil remand prisoners


    By Dr. Vickramabahu Karunaratne-2017-10-19

    Defence State Minister Ruwan Wijewardene insisted recently that prisoners kept under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) cannot be released. He reiterated that the remanded LTTE suspects, who had allegedly committed serious crimes, will not be freed without a judicial process despite the Hartal campaigns in the North and elsewhere. However, it is not clear whether he meant the few who are charged with some evidence or the entire 158 Tamil prisoners who are kept under the PTA because many of them have only their confessions 'against' them.

    The State Minister observed that the Hartal campaign in the North is politically motivated and a group seeking political mileage is behind it. Obviously keeping prisoners, for years and years will automatically become a serious political issue in a situation where nationality discrimination is involved.

    Wijewardene made these observations speaking to the media after an event at a school in Biyagama. The State Minister pointed out that several Tamil National Alliance (TNA) members are trying to disrupt the day-to-day life of the people in the North by organizing a Hartal campaign. It is true that these remand prisoners have become a political problem not only in the North but also in the South as well. They are remand prisoners accused of fighting for the liberation of a Tamil homeland using violence and terror. The Minister pointing out that there are no 'political prisoners' as claimed by the TNA, explained that investigations have revealed that those prisoners were involved in serious crimes during the time of war. That is not true; several of them are already accused of crimes against the State while others have not been charged so far. He noted that those prisoners could not be released without a judicial inquiry. "If there are delays in the judicial process, those must be rectified. However, the remand prisoners must go through the judicial process and either be convicted or released at the end of it," he said.

    Rajitha did not agree with Wijewardene

    However, Minister Rajitha Senaratne did not agree with Wijewardene. Rajitha said: "Apart from those who face legal issues for their criminal activities, the government should take legal steps either to charge them or release them.

    The issue of political prisoners should be resolved once and for all." Health Minister Senaratne's remarks have come as the families of these prisoners stepped up their protest campaigns in the North and in the South demanding the early release of their loved ones.

    Rajitha indicated: "The delay in releasing the Tamil political prisoners will seriously hamper the efforts for national reconciliation." As a top Cabinet Minister he insisted that the government should act fast on releasing the Tamil political prisoners who are being held for several years without proper charges. "The government has to take an urgent decision in this regard. They cannot keep these political prisoners forever," Cabinet Spokesman Minister Rajitha Senaratne told the media. Pointing out that similar political prisoners of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) were released under general amnesty after its 1971 and 1988 insurrections in the South, he said "therefore, it is incumbent on the government to take a faster decision on the release of Tamil political prisoners".

    Meanwhile, the Leader of the Opposition, R. Sampanthan raised the issue of Tamil political prisoners in Parliament recently and demanded the government to adopt a flexible approach to this issue. He said although the Foreign Minister has given a pledge to the UN Human Rights High Commissioner to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act, "the Tamil political prisoners are still being held under this draconian law.

    "Only 19 people have been released in the past. Many others are still being held under the PTA despite many protests. How can the government detain them under the PTA when the Foreign Minister himself is highly critical of it? The PTA is against the law and we cannot accept any legal action under it," Sampanthan said. An unnecessary complication has been created by the transfer of some cases from Vavuniya to Anuradhapura. If witnesses needed protection, such protection could have been provided without the cases being transferred.

    We have to very strongly urge that these remand prisoners be released without any further delay. In Jaffna President Maithripala Sirisena was heard as saying: "Come let us discuss and see how the matter can be solved. The Tamils voted for me, you must remember. Sivajilingam replied: "So how do you pay back your gratitude to the people who supported you." Simple, pardon and release these 158 Tamil prisoners.