Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, September 29, 2017

Remembering the Vietnam War

It seems a lot of Americans, French, and Australians come back to the scene of their misadventures.
Vietnam documentary

http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpgSep-27-2017

(SAN FRANCISCO, Calif.) - Watching the compelling documentary, The Vietnam War by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, brought back memories of my time in Vietnam in 1967-1968. The Tet Offensive occurred during my service there; it was a defining event in the Vietnam War. Tet, by the way, is the Vietnamese New Year.

I was a U.S. Army Transportation captain stationed in Saigon, now Ho Chi Minh City.
General William Westmoreland commanded the U.S. military operations in Vietnam War at its peak (1964–68), during the Tet Offensive. We on the ground knew that Westmoreland's highly publicized, overly optimistic assessments of the war were not true.

We "won" every battle, but lost the war. The 1968 Tet Offensive, in which communist forces, having staged a diversion at the Battle of Khe Sanh, attacked cities and towns throughout South Vietnam.

U.S. and South Vietnamese troops successfully fought off the attacks, and the communist forces took heavy losses, but the ferocity of the assault shocked public confidence in Westmoreland's previous assurances about the state of the war.

War is a spectacular show when watched from afar, but as the documentary shows, not so much up close. During the Tet Offensive, I remember the B-52 carpet bombing that shook the earth and I watched from a rooftop as our helicopter gunships strafed the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops.

I could hear explosions throughout Saigon as the Viet Cong attacked police stations and other government buildings. The U.S. military used Korean and Australian civilian workers who were housed in unprotected housing throughout Saigon. Many were killed by the Viet Cong.

After 1,000 years of domination by China, Vietnam’s conflicts with the French and U.S. were mere bumps in the road. Looking back, it seemed the Vietnamese got over the war much quicker than U.S. did.

I attended law school in Boston after the war at a time when the Boston/Cambridge area was a hotbed of anti-Vietnam activity. Many of my fellow classmates were attending law school to avoid the draft and often kiddingly called me Captain America whenever the New York Times reported on the war.

In 2006, I visited Vietnam with my wife. Our itinerary took us to Ho Chi Minh City, My Tho, Tay Ninh, Vinh Trang, Minh City, Hue, Hoi An, Halong Bay, and Hanoi. During the war, I did not appreciate what a beautiful country Vietnam is with its 2,000 mile coastline, jungles, beaches, and mountains and hills.

Vietnam is now one of the fastest growing economies in Southeast Asia. The U.S. signed a bilateral trade agreement in 2001; the U.S. is now the sixth largest investor in Vietnam.

We were greatly impressed by the excellent condition of Vietnam’s infrastructure, i.e., roads, bridges and public buildings. There was lots of construction going on around the country.
Ho Chi Minh City's (still commonly called Saigon) population in 1967 was approximately 1.7 million; today the population totals about 8.4 million. Vietnam is worried that Saigon is reaching a population saturation point.

While we were in Vietnam, an Agent Orange Conference was taking place. The U.S. military dumped 80 million litres of agent orange/dioxins in Vietnam. At least 2.1 million were victims of the toxins while another 4.8 million were indirectly effected.

We saw photos of some of the victims in the War Remnants Museum in Saigon. The dioxins effect those sprayed, and has caused birth defects in their children.

Each of our three guides asked if this was our first trip to Vietnam. I told him that I was a Vietnam veteran, stationed in Saigon in 1967-68. Our Saigon guide told us that he was in the South Vietnamese army and was stationed with the U.S. Marines in Danang.

After the U.S. defeat, he tried twice to escape, but was caught both times. He spent 2-1/2 years in prison. He is now an independent tour guide. He then proceeded to point out some of the U.S. 

occupation sites, most of which have since been torn down to build office buildings and housing.
Our Hue/Hoi An guide asked me if I had left any children behind, a bit of an indelicate question in front of my wife. I said no. Later we learned that he would have offered to assist me in finding these children if I had said yes. Our Hanoi/Halong Bay guide told us her father was in the North Vietnamese army and lost his leg in a land mine explosion. He still suffers pain.

Our visit to Saigon’s War Remnants Museum was a sobering highlight of our trip. As stated in the Museum’s brochure: “The role of the unique museum . . . is to preserve and display exhibits on war crimes and aftermaths [of] foreign aggressive forces caused [to] Vietnamese people.”

The photos are both gruesome and compelling. One section called “Requiem,” contains a collection of photos taken by 134 war reporters -- from 11 different countries -- killed during the Vietnam War.

The Epilogue to this section states in part: “[A] war in which so many died for illusions, and foolish causes, and mad dreams.” Thirty years later, former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara in his book In Retrospect: The Tragedies and Lessons of Vietnam admitted we were wrong about Vietnam. Will we ever get a similar admission or apology about the Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria wars?
It seems a lot of Americans, French, and Australians come back to the scene of their 

misadventures. Vietnam even offers tours to important war sites, such as the DMZ, the Cu Chi tunnels, and the so-called Hanoi Hilton where Senator John McCain spent seven years; it is now a museum and has photos of the American prisoners and displays McCain’s flight suit.

We met a group of French veterans of the Vietnam War -- remember France's defeat at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. When learning that I too was a Vietnam veteran, they insisted on a group photo. There is an irony there someplace.

While in Vietnam, we picked up an English translation of a book called The Sorrows of War by Bao Ninh, a veteran of North Vietnam’s Youth Brigade. Of the five hundred who went to war with the brigade in 1969, he is one of ten who survived.

His book has been compared to Erich Remarque’s All Quiet On the Western Front. A compelling read. Bao Ninh is featured in The Vietnam War.

Did we learn anything from the Vietnam War? Apparently not, given our misadventures since.
As George Hegel observed, "The one thing history undoubtedly teaches us is that people have never learned anything from History."

Do I even know you anymore?


President Trump recounted the failed health-care vote during his rally in Huntsville, Ala., on Sept. 22. When he mentioned Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the crowd booed. (The Washington Post)

  September 28 at 7:58 PM


Who are you? I’ve got to say that I really don’t know anymore. It’s kind of a strange turn of events since we went to the same public schools across the Deep South, then attended the same state colleges, cheering wildly on Saturdays for our favorite SEC teams, and spent Sunday mornings together in the same Southern Baptist pews. We even went to Training Union on Sunday nights.

Remember how our conversations always seemed to turn to politics? How we criticized Bill Clinton for playing so fast and loose with the truth? And how shamefully Democrats turned a blind eye to his fabrications and outright lies? Man, how could those Democrats sleep at night?

And what about how the guy we voted for, George W. Bush, running up the federal debt and launching ill-planned foreign adventures overseas? We swore that the next time Republicans got in power, we would pressure them to cut spending, attack the debt and put America’s foreign policy on a restrained and reasonable path. After Bush, we grew enraged by President Barack Obama’s efforts to reorder one-sixth of our economy on a straight party-line health-care vote. How reckless was that!
You and I always agreed that Washington Democrats and Republicans were cut from the same cloth, and that we needed to keep both sides honest. We were united by the shared belief that politicians must put country above party, right?

Right?
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). (Cliff Owen/Associated Press)

What happened to you?

The guys I came up with in Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and northwest Florida for more than 40 years would never boo a former American prisoner of war — especially one who refused to return home until the enemy released every one of his buddies in the prison camp. Southern guys like us loved that “leave no man behind” ethos when John Wayne or Sylvester Stallone exhibited it on movie screens. So why would you even think of booing a man, now fighting for his life, who showed that true grit in real life?

But boo Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) you did, at the behest of President Trump during a rally in Alabama last week.

Mike Allen of Axios further reported this week that Trump has been “physically mocking” the thumbs-down gesture McCain used to deliver the deciding vote against the Republican health-care bill in July. Did that mocking involve an imitation of McCain’s stiff arm movements? In case you haven’t read a newspaper in the 45 years since we played on the same Dixie Youth Baseball team together, McCain got the hell beaten out of him by the communists who held him in the Hanoi Hilton for more than five years.

At that same time, Trump was dodging the draft by claiming that bone spursstopped him from serving his country in uniform. And yet this crippling condition didn’t stop the spoiled Ivy League student from playing football, tennis and golf. After four draft deferments, Trump graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1968 on the same day 40 U.S. servicemen were killed in Vietnam.

Meanwhile, McCain continued receiving the beatings that would forever leave him incapable of lifting his arms over his head. He kept enduring torture because he refused to leave his band of brothers behind.

Do you have that kind of character? If you booed McCain at last week’s rally, don’t bother answering. Someone has obviously failed you in your life; you probably need to spend some time figuring out who that was. And if you still go to church, you may also want to pray for all those around you who put tribal politics ahead of basic humanity.
 Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) speaks to 60 Minutes about his groundbreaking thumbs down vote for the GOP's health-care bill. (Reuters)

Then maybe you should drive home and tell your children the story of John McCain’s sacrifice. If you can teach your children that lesson of heroism, there’s a chance they might grow up to have more character than the president you now praise.

And perhaps there just may be hope for our country.

U.S. Pulls Some Staff Out of Cuba After Bizarre Health Episodes

U.S. Pulls Some Staff Out of Cuba After Bizarre Health Episodes

No automatic alt text available.BY ROBBIE GRAMER-SEPTEMBER 29, 2017

The United States, puzzled by a spate of bizarre health incidents suffered by its diplomats in Cuba, on Friday ordered the bulk of its embassy staff and their families to go home until they have the answers.

The embassy in Havana will lose 60 percent of its staff and stop processing visas immediately, two senior State Department officials told reporters on Friday. The order is coupled with a new travel notice issued Friday warning U.S. citizens against traveling to Cuba.

The decision to pull out diplomats is the latest bump in the road of already rocky U.S.-Cuba relations since President Donald Trump took office, and it suggests intensifying U.S. concern about the mysterious ailments plaguing diplomats that have left officials and experts scratching their heads.

About a year ago, U.S. government personnel in Cuba began complaining of unexplained health problems, including hearing loss, dizziness, tinnitus, visual complaints, and cognitive issues. Some reported hearing loud noises or vibrations, sometimes only in only specific parts of the rooms they were in, while others felt nothing before experiencing symptoms, according to the AP, which first broke the story.

On Thursday, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert spoke of the “incidents” — not “attacks” — in Havana, and said they were under review, including with investigations on the ground by the FBI.

On Friday, a senior State Department official said the “targeted attacks” affected 21 people, and at least some occurred in hotels. The last reported attacks occurred in late August. While no tourists have been targeted, the State Department isn’t taking any chances and is now warning all U.S. citizens to steer clear of the island.

“Because our personnel’s safety is at risk and we are unable to identify the source of the attacks, we believe that U.S. citizens may also be at risk and warn them not to travel to Cuba,” said a senior State Department official.

Investigators initially suspected high-tech “sonic attacks” targeting diplomats, but they haven’t found any devices that could cause such symptoms and came up short on scientific explanations for the mystery.

“We don’t have any definitive conclusions regarding cause, source, or any kind of technologies that have been engaged or might have been used,” a State Department official said.

On Tuesday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson met with Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez to address the issue. Cuban President Raúl Castro has steadfastly denied any Cuban involvement in the incidents.

Despite Trump’s hawkish stance on Cuba, his administration has not blamed the Cuban government for the attacks, further deepening the mystery of who is responsible. “We acknowledge the efforts the Cuban government has made to investigate and its cooperation in facilitating the U.S. investigation,” a State Department official said. Officials wouldn’t rule out a third country being responsible for the attacks.

The mysterious attacks could strike a blow on efforts to repair ties between the two countries. Following 56 years of a strict embargo and sanctions, former President Barack Obama reopened relations with Cuba in 2015. Trump vowed to roll back parts of what he called Obama’s “terrible and misguided” Cuba policy during a speech in Miami in June, but three months later, he has still failed to issue new regulations to enact his pledge.

“The decision to reduce our diplomatic presence in Havana was made to ensure the safety of our personnel,” Tillerson said in a statement released Friday. He stressed that Washington maintains diplomatic relations with Cuba despite the episode. “We will continue to aggressively investigate these attacks until the matter is resolved,” he said.
Philippines drug war comes under fire from 39 countries at UN


A GROUP of 39 countries has raised “serious concern” regarding the human rights situation in the Philippines amid President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs.

In a joint statement released during the UN Human Rights Council’s 36th Session in Geneva this week, a group of European nations, Australia, the US and the UK emphasised that the Philippines needs to investigate all killings, combat a climate of impunity, and protect human rights defenders (HRDs).

At least 7,000 people have been killed in anti-drug operations since Duterte took power last June according to official police statistics, with some rights groups estimating the figure is more like 13,000.


“We urge the government to pursue investigations of alleged human rights violations and abuses and to create a safe and secure environment for indigenous communities, journalists and HRDs,” said the statement read by Iceland’s representative to the Human Rights Council (HRC).

The Philippines is one of the most dangerous places on earth for journalists, concerns over their safety are heightened under the Duterte administration because the President has actively encouraged violence against the media.

2017-08-30T122952Z_522746913_RC1256D24300_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-MILITANTS
Duterte gestures as he delivers his speech, during the oath taking of Philippine National Police (PNP) star rank officers, at the Malacanang Presidential Palace in Manila, Philippines, on Aug 30, 2017. Source: Reuters/Romeo Ranoco

The government-controlled lower house of Philippines parliament recently voted to award the national Commission on Human Rights (CHR) – which has been investigating widespread allegations of abuses during the war on drugs – just US$20 budget for 2018.

The decision was later overturned after an appeal from the CHR’s chairman, despite a key government figure calling the body “useless” and past threats from Duterte to shut it down completely. The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples also had its budget restored.

The HRC members’ statement also called upon the government to work with the UN and civil society organisations to “promote and protect human rights, including by welcoming a visit from the SR [Special Rapporteur] on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, without preconditions or limitations.”

The Philippines has invited UNSR Agnes Callamard to investigate extrajudicial killings, but only on the condition that can be personally interrogated by Duterte in a public debate. Duterte has repeatedly cursed Callamard, calling her a “son of a bitch” and “stupid.”

2017-09-21T100713Z_1565093774_RC1133D25680_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-PROTEST
A protestor pretends to be dead to picture one of the victims of Duterte’s war on drugs during a National Day of Protest outside the Malacanang presidential palace in metro Manila, Philippines, on Sept 21, 2017. A note read ‘Don’t imitate it was mistaken identity’. Source: Reuters/Romeo Ranoco

Foreign minister Alan Peter Cayetano on Thursday told US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that the Philippines had “nothing to hide”, was open to an “independent and fair” investigation of its human rights situation.

Cayetano also thanked Washington for US$2 million in support of the drugs war, reported the state Philippine News Agency.

After record numbers of killings during a major, nationwide drug operation in August, Manila police spokesman Colonel Erwin Margarejo said: “Let’s kill another 32 every day. Maybe we can reduce what ails this country.”

Duterte has even said the police should kill his own son, Davao City’s Vice Mayor Paolo Duterte, who stands accused of being involved with shipments of illicit drugs from China.

DNA surgery on embryos removes disease


Embryo research
BBC
By James Gallagher-28 September 2017
Precise "chemical surgery" has been performed on human embryos to remove disease in a world first, Chinese researchers have told the BBC.
The team at Sun Yat-sen University used a technique called base editing to correct a single error out of the three billion "letters" of our genetic code.
They altered lab-made embryos to remove the disease beta-thalassemia. The embryos were not implanted.
The team says the approach may one day treat a range of inherited diseases.
Base editing alters the fundamental building blocks of DNA: the four bases adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine.
They are commonly known by their respective letters, A, C, G and T.
All the instructions for building and running the human body are encoded in combinations of those four bases.
The potentially life-threatening blood disorder beta-thalassemia is caused by a change to a single base in the genetic code - known as a point mutation.
The team in China edited it back.
They scanned DNA for the error then converted a G to an A, correcting the fault.
Junjiu Huang, one of the researchers, told the BBC News website: "We are the first to demonstrate the feasibility of curing genetic disease in human embryos by base editor system."
He said their study opens new avenues for treating patients and preventing babies being born with beta-thalassemia, "and even other inherited diseases".
The experiments were performed in tissues taken from a patient with the blood disorder and in human embryos made through cloning.

Genetics revolution

Base editing is an advance on a form of gene-editing known as Crispr, that is already revolutionising science.
Crispr breaks DNA. When the body tries to repair the break, it deactivates a set of instructions called a gene. It is also an opportunity to insert new genetic information.
Base editing works on the DNA bases themselves to convert one into another.
Prof David Liu, who pioneered base editing at Harvard University, describes the approach as "chemical surgery".
He says the technique is more efficient and has fewer unwanted side-effects than Crispr.
He told the BBC: "About two-thirds of known human genetic variants associated with disease are point mutations.
"So base editing has the potential to directly correct, or reproduce for research purposes, many pathogenic [mutations]."
The research group at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou hit the headlines before when they were the first to use Crispr on human embryos.
Prof Robin Lovell-Badge, from the Francis Crick Institute in London, described parts of their latest study as "ingenious".
But he also questioned why they did not do more animal research before jumping to human embryos and said the rules on embryo research in other countries would have been "more exacting".
The study, published in Protein and Cell, is the latest example of the rapidly growing ability of scientists to manipulate human DNA.
It is provoking deep ethical and societal debate about what is and is not acceptable in efforts to prevent disease.
Prof Lovell-Badge said these approaches are unlikely to be used clinically anytime soon.
"There would need to be far more debate, covering the ethics, and how these approaches should be regulated.
"And in many countries, including China, there needs to be more robust mechanisms established for regulation, oversight, and long-term follow-up."
Follow James on Twitter.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

Mullaitivu residents concerned about militarisation demand removal of army camp from school roads

Home
28Sep 2017
Mullaitivu residents have demanded the removal of an army camp that surround schools in the district, citing concerns about the negative effects of militarisation on the area's young people.
Parents of students at two schools in the Manthai East division have repeatedly asked for the army camps close to the schools to be moved.
A large-scale army camp on around 8.5 acres of land is situated opposite Palinagar Maha Vidhyalayam and Kumaraswamy Vidhyalayam, both leading schools in the division.
Parents say having the camp right outside the schools’ gates has created the kind of militarised environment which is not conducive to their children’s wellbeing and education.
The Sri Lankan Army has so far refused to withdraw from the location, saying the land was allocated by the Divisional Secretariat expressly for military use.

Constitutional choices and Tamil politics – Part 1


Featured image courtesy Associated Press
DEVANESAN NESIAH-on 
In his articles in The Island of Wednesday 20th and Thursday 21st September 2017, Dr Dayan Jayatilleka starts by asking the correct question, provides a correct answer and goes on to identify the critical challenges in formulating a new Constitution. Dayan does not, as so many others do, mindlessly reject the need for a new Constitution or any radical amendment to the existing one. Instead, he prescribes limits to what could be included in such a constitution or an amendment. These limits are based on his identification of what he describes as three types of Sri Lankan Separatists. It is such identification that I have problems with. Though he does not say so explicitly, he seems to concede that every form of internal self-determination or regional autonomy could conceivably be a step towards a totally deferent outcome, viz external self-determination or secession. The LTTE never made this mistake – that is why they opposed every form of internal self-determination or regional autonomy. They knew it would be a barrier to secession which has always been their only goal.  But separation has never been viable, and those groups that sponsored it have been eliminated. Overall, I am largely in agreement with what Dayan has written.
To the best of my knowledge, even the most ardent federalist within the Tamil political leadership never favored secession, nor insisted on the degree of devolution that exists in the USA, Canada, Switzerland, and many other countries. The Vaddukoddai revolution must be seen as largely an expression of despair on the part of the political leadership and of its exploitation by armed Separatists, particularly the LTTE. Of the countries listed above, Canada had a secession problem till about three decades ago, but no longer. Many countries have broken up, such as the USSR, but not on an account of excessive devolution. In fact in several cases it is for lack of devolution as in Pakistan and East Europe. As a rule, federalism and devolution help to keep united countries that would, otherwise have separated. This is certainly true of India, with the sole exception of Kashmir. Kashmir is a problem, created by British imperialism at the time of Independence of India and Pakistan.
Any secession in Sri Lanka will have a deadly domino effect on India. Kashmir apart, every separatists movement in India, and there were many, has dissipated or diminished in intensity. This development has been accelerated by increased devolution within India as well as by the Supreme Court ruling in the Bommai case relating to the dissolution of the Karnataka State Assembly that the Indian Government, long regarded as quasi-federal, is essentially federal. That remarkable judgement reinstated the Karnataka State Assembly dissolved a year earlier as well as the Bommai administration of Karnataka. This bold and far-reaching judgement dramatically limits the powers of the center over the province and, in the process, took on the powerful Indira Gandhi who continued to be Prime Minister of India. That such a judgement was possible reflects well on the quality of the Judiciary of India.
Indira Gandhi’s support for a few Tamil militant groups who then claimed to be fighting for secession was clearly to teach a lesson to President J.R Jayewardene and Prime Minister Premadasa who had both insulted her. Neither Indira nor the Indian establishment would have permitted secession in Sri Lanka under any circumstances. The extent of support of militant groups was clearly calculated to harass J.R and Premadasa while ensuring, that the militants were in no position to secure secession. Even if by some unimagined accident of history the narrow sliver of land to the North-East of Sri Lanka formed an independent government, that state would not have lasted more than a few days. No country anywhere would have defied India and recognized or helped to defend that state. This has been well understood by every political group of any consequence in Sri Lanka, India and the global Tamil diaspora. Even the political leaders who claimed to support the Vaddukoddai resolution clearly did not believe in or even want secession because very soon after the Vaddukoddai resolution they accepted and cooperated with the operation of the DDC bill which did not provide even a significant fraction of the devolution offered in the Bandaranayake-Chelvenayakam pact or the Dudley-Chelvenayakam pact or other arrangements negotiated subsequently. I am personally aware of this because I was involved in the decision making leading to my accepting the office of Secretary/ District Ministry, Secretary/DDC and Government Agent of Jaffna in 1981. Both Indira Gandhi’s support to the militants and the Vaddukoddai resolution that preceded it would have proved to be wholly disastrous for the Tamil people of Sri Lanka.
Prof A.J Wilson and Dr Neelan Tiruchelvam met me a year earlier to ask if I would accept my proposed appointment in Jaffna. I responded by expressing my reservation because the DDC bill had been emasculated of all significant devolution and those powers were transferred to the District Ministers who were appointed precisely to undermine the DDCs. Wilson and Neelan agreed with me but mentioned that the Jaffna DDC would be regarded as the lead institution and, if it worked well, the DDC bill would be amended to provide greater devolution. I told them that I don’t believe it and asked them if they did. Thy replied that they had reservation too but, apart from the carrot of more devolution, there was also a stick. J.R had told them he got information of a plan towards an island-wide anti-Tamil pogrom and that continuing close relationship between the national leadership and the Tamil leadership would be the way to avert such a disaster. I then agreed to accept the appointment.
I was installed in that office soon after the burning of the Jaffna Public Library in 1981 by police and thugs brought into Jaffna mostly from Kurunegala, by Ministers Cyril Mathew and Gamini Dissanayake to help to rig the Jaffna DDC elections and to commit such violence as deemed necessary. The rigging of the Jaffna DDC election failed due to incompetence on the part of those assigned to do it, but they burnt down the Jaffna Public Library with over 90 thousand books and documents, many of them irreplaceable. They also did some killings and attempted to kill V. Yogeswaran, M.P for Jaffna.  This was the state of Jaffna when I took office in June 1981.
I was involved, together with DDC Chairman Mr Nadarajah and fellow public officer S.Sivathasan, in my official capacity, in negotiation for more power to the DDC, which I will discuss in part II. Those negotiations not only unraveled, but led to most unforeseen developments in my career.

The New Constitution & The Same Old Underwear

“It is the policy of (Name of the Company) not to discriminate against any applicant for employment, or any employee because of age, colour, gender, disability, national origin, race, religion, caste or veteran status…” ~ An extract from the annual report of a company listed in Colombo Stock Exchange
“The Constitution shall accord the foremost place to Buddhism. The Existing Article 9 shall be maintained just as it is without any amendment… ” ~ Page 29, Interim Report of the Steering Committee, The Constitutional Assembly of Sri Lanka.
Several times in my life, I have been met by people carrying pamphlets and trying to inform me that the religion they follow and the God they worship are the correct way to heaven. They would fervently preach that Gold loves me and is doing all his best to help to come over all my troubles. Once I had severe financial difficulty (I always have but this time it was severe) and I thought time has come for me to let the God into my life. I attended a group worship. I prayed with them. They prayed for me. They were really nice people. And finally the preacher started to preach us. Then he asked the devotees to donate some money to the particular institution.
This was the same pattern with all the other religions. The men of God will preach us and pray for us and finally ask us for financial contribution saying it is for the God. All the religions portray the God as the almighty creator of this universe who has the power to change anything and everything. But in contrast to this, my subconscious mind started to believe that God is someone like me, a person plagued with financial difficulties.
What is surprising to my rational mind is that how religion is able to dominate one’s life? After all it’s just a choice of a way to reach the God. We accept the fact that there are numerous ways to prepare a cup of tea. We accept that people have different choices and it is their fundamental right to choose something they like unless it harms the others. But why this rationalism instantly vanishes when it comes to religion?
Many of those who identify themselves as ardent Buddhists, Catholics, Hindus or Muslims will find difficult to understand that religion is just a collective belief. Something which exists only in the mindset of those who believe it. This is exactly what Kanye West and Jay-z tell in their song ‘No Church in the Wild’.
“Human beings in a mob.
What is a mob to a king? What’s a king to a god?
What’s a god to a non-believer…?”
Now I want to ask a question.
How much Buddhism amounts to a Christian Sinhalese, to a Tamil, to a Muslim, to an atheist, and to an agnostic? The Constitution says it places Buddhism in the foremost place. Then what about the Christian Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims? They too are the citizens of this country. Won’t their fundamental rights being violated by placing Buddhism in the foremost place?
Another question is, what this state is trying to achieve by giving prominence to Buddhism through the constitution itself? Who is benefiting from it? Is it the common man of this country? Or at least the common Sinhala Buddhist of this country? This will benefit only the members of Maha Sangha and the Buddhist monks to have a place in the society and assist them to get financial resources.

Read More

Watchful public will lead to more efficient govt. service: Mangala on RTI

As the government celebrated its second Right to Information (RTI) day this year, Mass Media and Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera believed that a more watchful public will lead the way to an efficient government service.
Previous occurrences around the world has proved that when people have access to information and are watching, the public service is forced to perform, Minister Samaraweera said.
Addressing a workshop organized by the Department of Government Information held today at the Global Towers in Wellawatte, the Minister quoted economist Joseph Stiglitz and his theory of asymmetric information to highlight the need to have the RTI.
“Prof Stiglitz says that due to the ability to gain access to information, public officials are forced to inform, which is not otherwise available to the general public. Officials are only able to impose policies on people serving them”, he explained.  
“When the system of access to and distribution of information is improved, one can minimize the misuse of information by public officials”, he added.
The Minister also dismissed allegations that the RTI would simply discourage public officials from carrying out their work due to the fear of censure.
“These arguments have been put forward by those who don’t want this implemented. We have continuously trained government officials and spoken to them about how they can do their job without breaching any laws and serve the people more efficiently”, he said.  
They have also appointed 3,000 Information Officers to government institutions.
The RTI Act which came into force in June of 2016 has since helped many discover information previously not available.
The Minister pointed out that the mother of Roshen Chanaka who was murdered in a protest 2011, was able to get the report on an inquiry because of the RTI.
“The report was complete in 2011 and was handed over to the President at the time. But it was not made public until now”, said Samaraweera.   
The Minister who stressed that the RTI was one promise made at the election campaign which the government has kept, said they would work to further strengthen it through their Vision 2025.