Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, September 21, 2017

33 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan Army in 1990 Savukkadi massacre remembered in Batticaloa

Home

21Sep 2017
33 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan soldiers in Savukkadi in 1990 were remembered in Batticaloa on Wednesday, 27 years since the massacre took place.
On the morning of September 20 1990, Sri Lankan soldiers entered the Savukkadi village and opened fire on civilians. 26 villagers, including 10 children and an infant, were burnt to death and buried in two ditches. Soldiers also shot at fishermen in the waters off the village, killing 7.
The memorial event took place at the remembrance monument to the massacre victims in Savukkadi, followed by special prayers at the Thannamunai St. Joseph Church.

Media Freedom: alive and not so well… is it?



FOURTH ESTATE, OR FIFTH COLUMN? In the good old days, it was said that journalists could be bought for a snifter of bottled sunshine. Today, it’s “sunshine stories” that too many scribes in the so-called free media milieu are bottling for public consumption. While far more murder mysteries than is healthy for a civil society vis-à-vis its editors and writers lie unsolved, a conspiracy of the willing is being hatched for the further enforced willing suspension of disbelief under administrations ostensibly championing the maxim that the pen is mightier than the spoken word. At liberty for a brace of years, and with the newfound independence of RTI behind it, the freedom of the wild ass still rampages through social media and tributaries of the mainstream – perhaps prompting the powers that be to consider legislation to gild the lily… so here’s fair warning: let’s gird our loins for the coming grind – for no government (good, bad, or ugly) has the best interests of unbound facts and unfettered commentary at heart, at bottom

– Pic by Shehan Gunasekara


logoFriday, 22 September 2017

Today the only corpses in sight are those lining the bullpen – critics and social commentators who have fallen asleep at their desks, lulled by a democracy that offers peace but pre-empts justice. Oscar Wilde, had he been around, might have re-essayed his aphorism that “in those days, newspapers were edited by somebodies and read by everyone; today editorials are written by nobodies and read by no one”.

Executive Presidency should be abolished: JVP

Sandasen Marasinghe and Camelia Nathaniel-Thursday, September 21, 2017
The Executive Presidency should be abolished by the new Constitution in order to guarantee the existence of a vibrant democracy in the country, said Chief Opposition Whip and JVP Parliamentarian Anura Kumara Dissanayake today. 
 He made this observation after Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe presented the Interim Report of the Steering Committee before the Constitutional Assembly, which was held in the Main Chamber of the House of Parliament.
Commencing his speech MP Dissanayake stated that the JVP had a different view over the Constitution.
He said that their party decided to support the process of formulating a new Constitution as they are maintaining that the constitution should be changed.
He added that the electoral system should be changed as well.
"It should be done by the way of a new Constitution and not by any other means," MP Dissanayake said.
"The other matter is that the Executive Presidency should also be changed."
He stated that the 1978 constitution was designed to polarize power around Executive Presidency.
"However 19 amendments have been made to the Constitution since then," MP Dissanayake said.
"The existing government has made Amendments on 17 occasions in order to secure their power."
He said further that the sovereignty of the people, national defence and the people’s rights should be secured by the Constitution.

SRI LANKA: FULL TEXT OF THE INTERIM REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL ASSEMBLY


Image: The name of booklet in the hand ” Lets get ready for a new constitution. (c) M.Deshapriya.
Introduction.

Sri Lanka Brief21/09/2017

The Constitutional Assembly established by Parliamentary Resolution of 09th March 2016 unanimously appointed a Steering Committee at its first sitting on 05th April 2016.
The Steering Committee identified 12 main subject areas and assigned six of those subjects to Sub-Committees appointed by the Constitutional Assembly on 05th May 2016. The Reports of the said six Sub Committees and another report by an ad-hoc Committee appointed by the Steering Committee were tabled before the Constitutional Assembly on 19th November and 10th December 2016 respectively.
This Interim Report of the Steering Committee deals with the remaining six subjects that were not assigned to any Sub-Committee and contains principles and formulations that reflect the deliberations of the Steering Committee of the Constitutional Assembly that met 73 times between April 2016 and September 2017.
Included in this Interim Report are observations and comments by Members of the Steering Committee on the principles and formulations contained in the Report.
Members of the Steering Committee of the Constitutional Assembly
Hon. Ranil Wickremesinghe, Prime Minister (Chairman)
Hon. Nimal Siripala de Silva
Hon. Rajavarothiam Sampanthan
Hon. Rauff Hakeem
Hon. Dinesh Gunawardena
Hon. Lakshman Kiriella
Hon. Douglas Devananda
Hon. A. D. Susil Premajayantha
Hon. Anura Dissanayake
Hon. Rishad Bathiudeen
Hon. (Dr.)Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe
Hon. Patali Champika Ranawaka
Hon. Bimal Rathnayake
Hon. D. M. Swaminathan
Hon. M. A. Sumanthiran
Hon. Mano Ganesan
Hon. Prasanna Ranatunga
Hon. Malik Samarawickrama
Hon.(Dr.)Jayampathy Wickramaratne
Hon. Dilan Perera
Hon.(Dr.)(Mrs.) Thusitha Wijemanna
Read the full report as  a PDF:ReportE CRR
ReportE-CRR.pdf by Thavam on Scribd

Batticaloa locals remember 17 Tamils killed by Muslim Home Guards in Puthukudiyiruppu massacre

Home

22Sep 2017
Batticaloa locals paid tribute on Thursday to 17 Tamil civilians massacred by Muslim Home Guards in Puthukudiyiruppu (Batticaloa) 27 years ago.
On 21st September 1990, 17 Tamils from the village on the Batticaloa-Kalmunai Road were stabbed or shot to death by Muslim Home Guards. The victims included women and children.
The massacre was part of an onslaught carried out by the Sri Lankan Army and supporting paramilitaries which resulted in several massacres of Tamils within days of each other in Batticaloa.
As well as a formal memorial event, a blood donation drive was held in memory of the victims of the massacre.

SRI LANKA: Technician disappeared in Anuradhapura

Appeal : Technician disappeared in Anuradhapura
AHRC Logo

Dear Friends,

September 20, 2017

The Asian Human Rights Commission has received information regarding Sudath Darmapriya (40) of Kalawana, Minuwangoda in Gampaha District. Sudath has been missing since 12 July 2017. He is a permanent resident of Minuwangoda and a technician by profession. He was managing a Pandal, in Anuradhapura from 26 June 2017. He telephoned his wife on 12 July and promised he will be returning home soon. But until now there is not any information forthcoming about his whereabouts. The wife of the victim G. Sujeewa Dilhani lodged a complaint with the Minuwangoda Police Station and the Senior Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Anuradhapura. But the Police have not yet started a prompt, effective and full investigation into the complaint.

Case Narrative:

Sudath Darmapriya (40) of Kalawana, Minuwangoda in Gampaha District is married and the father of 2 children. He was fortunate to have be a very versatile person. He has several professions: technician; drummer; dancer and electrician.

On 26 June 2017, he departed to Anuradhapura from his home in Minuwangoda by motorcycle. After reaching Anuradhapura Sudath called his wife G. Sujeewa Dilhani and informed her and his children that he arrived safely at his workplace. He was to build a Pandal (‘Thorana’ in Sinhalese Language). He was responsible to develop and maintain the electric circuitry and supply management system of the Pandal.

On 12 July 2017, Sudath called his wife Sujeewa to say that he will return home early as he was able to finish his work successfully. Although he did not own a mobile phone himself, he used the mobile phone of one of the organizers of the celebration.

He had promised to return soon, but Sudath did not return home. Then Sujeewa called the organizers of the event in the Anuradhapura and questioned them about her husband. However, they did not reply and did not provide any details about Sudath. After waiting for several weeks, finally, Sujeewa went to the Minuwangoda Police Station and lodged a complaint on the disappearance of her husband. Recording the complaint, the Officers provided her the reference details as follows. No: CIB/1/171/408 and MCR/3110/2017.

Several days after making her complaint, she went to the Senior Deputy Inspector General’s Office (SDIG) of Anuradhapura and made a second complaint about the disappearance of Sudath. Her complaint was accepted.

Sujeewa states that after two months since the disappearance of her husband, she is still searching to know the fate of her husband. The Police have yet to make a prompt, efficient, full investigation into the disappearance of her husband who remains missing.

She states that the Police, as the local law enforcement agency, is responsible to investigate her complaint and arrest those who are responsible for Sudath’s disappearance and bring them to justice for this crime.

Suggested Action:

Please send letters to the Authorities listed below expressing your concern about this case. Request an immediate Police investigation into the allegations of not properly investigating this disappearance case and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the Law. Please urge the National Police Commission (NPC) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to open a special investigation into the mal-practice of Police Officers for abusing their powers.
To support this case, please click here: 
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear ________,
SRI LANKA: Technician disappeared in Anuradhapura

Name of Victims: 1) Mr.Sudath Darmapriya (40) of Kalawana, Minuwangoda in Gampaha District 2) G. Sujeewa Dilhani, wife of Mr. Sudath Darmapriya

Alleged perpetrators: 1) unknown individuals

2) Several officers attached to the Senior Deputy Inspector General of Police Office in Anuradhapura
Date of incident: 12 July 2017

Place of incident: Anuradhapura Police Division

According to the information I have received Mr. Sudath Darmapriya (40) of Kalawana, Minuwangoda in Gampaha District is married and the father of two children. He was fortunate to have be a very versatile person. He has several professions: technician; drummer; dancer and electrician.

On 26 June 2017, he departed to Anuradhapura from his home in Minuwangoda by motorcycle. After reaching Anuradhapura Sudath called his wife G. Sujeewa Dilhani and informed her and his children that he arrived safely at his workplace. He was to build a Pandal (‘Thorana’ in Sinhalese Language). He was responsible to develop and maintain the electric circuitry and supply management system of the Pandal.

On 12 July 2017, Sudath called his wife Sujeewa to say that he will return home early as he was able to finish his work successfully. Although he did not own a mobile phone himself, he used the mobile phone of one of the organizers of the celebration.

He had promised to return soon, but Sudath did not return home. Then Sujeewa called the organizers of the event in the Anuradhapura and questioned them about her husband. However, they did not reply and did not provide any details about Sudath. After waiting for several weeks, finally, Sujeewa went to the Minuwangoda Police Station and lodged a complaint on the disappearance of her husband. Recording the complaint, the Officers provided her the reference details as follows. No: CIB/1/171/408 and MCR/3110/2017.

Several days after making her complaint, she went to the Senior Deputy Inspector General’s Office (SDIG) of Anuradhapura and made a second complaint about the disappearance of Sudath. Her complaint was accepted.

Sujeewa states that after two months since the disappearance of her husband, she is still searching to know the fate of her husband. The Police have yet to make a prompt, efficient, full investigation into the disappearance of her husband who remains missing.

She states that the Police, as the local law enforcement agency, is responsible to investigate her complaint and arrest those who are responsible for Sudath’s disappearance and bring them to justice for this crime.

I request the intervention of your good offices to ensure that the Authorities listed below open an immediate investigation into allegations of violations of fundamental rights of the victim by Officers of the Sri Lanka Police Department. The officers involved should also be subject to an internal investigation for breach of Police Departmental orders.
Yours sincerely,
---------------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
1. Mr. Pujith Jayasundara
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877
E-mail: igp@police.lk
2. Mr. Jayantha Jayasooriya PC
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk
3. Secretary
National Police Commission
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers
109 Galle Road
Colombo 03
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 395310
Fax: +94 11 2 395867
E-mail: npcgen@sltnet.lk or polcom@sltnet.lk
4. Secretary
Human Rights Commission
No. 36, Kynsey Road
Colombo 8
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk
Thank you.

Women’s Action Network Protests Further Delay On Disappearances Bill

logo
On Monday 18th September, the media reported that President Sirisena promised the Joint Opposition (JO) to further delay presentation of a bill to criminalise enforced disappearance in Sri Lanka. Women’s Action Network (WAN) is deeply troubled at the lack of political will to change the course for future generations of Sri Lankans. By caving in to false claims by the JO that the bill will put the military at risk of prosecution for past crimes, the government is reneging on its own commitments to its people and the international community to prevent disappearances from this point forward.
Memorialization ritual performed by mothers of disappeared
The government ratified the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (CED) in 2016 and promised to enact domestic legislation to criminalise enforced disappearance on a forward-looking basis. This reflected both the demands of affected women to ensure non-recurrence and Sri Lanka’s own commitment to the U.N. Human Rights Council in that regard. In July, Parliament postponed the debate on the enforced disappearance bill, prompting 396 women from families of disappeared from all regions and ethnic communities to sign a statement in protest. Now, just as the bill was set for Parliamentary debate on 21st September, it has again been postponed.
Criminalising enforced disappearance is essential for reconciliation in Sri Lanka. The bill, upon being passed in to law, is to ensure that no Sri Lankan will have to experience the same pain and uncertainty of having a relative go missing for decades. It will also rebuild trust in the Sri Lankan state across ethnic divides, instilling a belief that the state will protect future generations from violence. Speaking before the Public Representations Committee on Constitutional Reform (PRC) last February, a woman searching for the past 8 years for her husband asked how a new constitution would ensure that her son does not also get abducted. The final report of the Consultations Task Force (CTF) documented views across all communities and likewise emphasized the need to enact laws “to prevent abductions, arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions and disappearances in the future.” In Mannar, Matara, Anuradhapura, Batticaloa, etc, affected women came before the ZTF (Zonal Task Force) to plead that “no other person should suffer as they had.” The CTF noted that even members of the police and security forces expressed “unequivocal support” for reconciliation initiatives “to ensure non-recurrence.”
Sri Lanka has a troubled history of enforced disappearances. Since 1994, successive commissions have received over 65,000 complaints of missing persons. As of 2013, Sri Lanka was ranked second highest in the world in unresolved disappearance cases. No community has been spared, and as the July statement made clear, affected women feel the same pain across ethnicities. Only through criminalising disappearance can the government show all its citizens (Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim) that it has the political will to fight for good governance and the protection of human rights.
While delaying progress at home, the President on 19th September told the U.N. General Assembly that the government has “laid the foundation necessary to forge national reconciliation, and ensure non-recurrence of conflict.” But if this were true, the President would not cave in to the JO’s misinformation and delay the enforced disappearance bill. The JO claimed that the extradition clause in the proposed bill would be detrimental to Sri Lanka’s war heroes and lead to their prosecution abroad. But the disappearances bill simply gives legal effect to the CED under Sri Lankan law, just as the Torture Act enacted by the People’s Alliance government in 1994 codifies the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The “extradite or prosecute” clause that the JO challenges is a standard provision in international treaties, and identical language appears in both CAT and CED. Just as enactment of the Torture Act did not lead to any unwarranted extraditions in the past, we have no reason to believe that the disappearance bill will either.

Read More

SRI LANKA: INTERIM REPORT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: PRINCIPALS OF DEVOLUTION


Image:A  banner at a public campaign meeting (16.08.17)by civil society group says solve the ethnic issue by devolving power .

Sri Lanka Brief21/09/2017

Chapter 6 of the the Interim Report of the Steering Committee of the constitutional assembly of Sri Lanka deals with the issue of devolution.

The chapter called principals of devolution fellows:
  1. Principle of Subsidiarity to Apply.
This principle of subsidiarity, (i.e. whatever could be handled by the lowest tier should be vested in it) has been generally accepted in submissions made before the Steering Committee, the Sub-Committees, as well as the Public Representations Committee for Constitutional Reforms.

Even as president reiterates executive presidency shall be abolished ,his SLFP party takes contradictory stand ! (video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 21.Sep.2017, 12.30PM) The first official document alias interim report regarding  a new constitution is to be tabled before the steering committee of the Constitution formulation committee which is to meet today (21) .
This comprehensive document incorporates the proposals of all parties representing the parliament : Proposals of the six  sub committees appointed by the Constitution formulation committee , and proposals of the Lal Wijenaike committee appointed to gather public opinion. 
This document was delayed because the SLFP dilly dallied with  its proposals. In any case  the proposals finally  submitted by it reveal a  bizarre fairy tale  .  The SLFP which vehemently opposed the executive presidency since the day Late J.R. Jayawardena introduced it  in 1978, has in its latest proposals stated to the dismay and disappointment of all that the executive presidency shall be continued. The proposal of the SLFP in connection with the devolution of powers too is fluid and vague it is learnt. 
Yet, president Maithripala the SLFP president who came to power after making solemn promises and vowing  an umpteen times that he  would abolish the executive presidency , and will not contest the presidential election again , reiterated his stand in no uncertain terms when he recently met with the leaders of the Civil organizations. When the latter had questioned isn’t the SLFP taking a contradictory  stance  ?  the president had made it abundantly clear  he would take every step to secure the necessary two third majority in parliament to abolish the executive presidency.

However , some members of the Constitution formulation committee  represented by all parties to bring forth a  new constitution charged that  the spirit and interest of the SLFP party in favor of the new constitution is flagging. 
The interim report pertaining to the democratic new constitution that was  scheduled to be tabled today (21) , is to be discussed further , and the relevant draft bill of the new constitution after changes is to be tabled in parliament. Thereafter it must be  passed with a two third majority in parliament , and  okayed via a referendum. 
There is no doubt the country is at a most crucial point in its political history –it marks a watershed in country’s  history ! It is the duty of all to contribute towards this new constitution which aims at eradicating a biggest enemy and obstacle  to democracy - the executive presidency. 
In the  video footage below is the speech of Dr. Wickremabahu which  analyzes the abominable policies of SLFP which cannot be approved of 
---------------------------
by     (2017-09-21 06:48:03)

The DIG for whom president’s order is not applicable!

The DIG for whom president’s order is not applicable!

- Sep 21, 2017

Lanka News Web previously made a revelation, on July 30, about DIG (supplies) Priyantha Weerasuriya. He responded to it, and we published it without any change to ensure the right to reply. However, we have to write about him once again.
  Police know very well that Weerasuriya has a talent to make use of his position, but keep that a secret. Leaving alone his performance as the DIG in charge of supplies, his supplies for himself are so good that it is amply demonstrated by the luxury house he is building at Udumulla road in Battaramulla. We must say that it is not his house, but a house of the police, as the police bear all costs for its construction. Police work hard for the house that is coming up on a nine-perch plot.
In a place like the police, juniors have to serve the personal needs of the superiors, which is due to the fault of the big bosses. Weerasuriya uses vehicles, personnel of the police for the construction of the house. Further, he has erected a ‘walking fence’ around his property. Located behind it is the Diyawanna, owned by the UDA. He is expanding his property, by using debris from buildings dismantled in Colombo and suburbs. He is increasing the elevation of the land too, blocking the flow of water. The UDA knows this illegal act by him, but does nothing as he is a DIG. The first citizen of the country has declared land filling as being illegal. That order is not applicable to DIG Priyantha Weerasuriya.

Chaos, corruption covered by ‘Sinhala Patriotism’



2017-09-22 
What is important is to tell these marginalised Sinhala Buddhists, they are taken care of even through the Constitution
I have been given many epithets for trying to promote a decent and a civilised “North-South” dialogue for a common and a shared future with due respect to each other’s cultural identities.   
This week began with epithets like “Voice of (Tamil) Diaspora” and “A dollar paid Traitor”. Another called me a “Sinhala Buddhist basher”.   
All commenting online, on the feature article which carried excerpts of Northern Province Chief Minister Justice C.V. Wigneswaran’s keynote speech, at my book launch titled Rajapaksa the Sinhala Selfie, that was carried in the Dailymirror  on Tuesday.  

Not surprisingly, these online patriots come from the so-called educated Sinhala urban middle class.   

All who still want to believe (Beliefs are often blind), the conclusion of the war has given them a “wonderful life” denied during the 30-year war. And perhaps believe this Yahapalanaya is to be blamed for what is going wrong now, despite the war victory.
Yet this Yahapalanaya Government is not messing up anything new. They are only continuing with the mess that was left for them to carry through.
Though the urban middle class Sinhala citizens, vowed it was Rajapaksa and the Executive Presidency that led to mega corruption with an authoritative rule and ousting Rajapaksa would solve all problems, their Rainbow Revolution faded off in a month after ousting Rajapaksa in 2015 January. The mega bond scam and other deals followed no sooner than the sound of crackers died off.  

It is the inability or reluctance of the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe Unity Government to break off from this Rajapaksa politics that drags this country into further mess. All because they are stuck hard and fast running a marathon with Rajapaksa, who is off on a Sinhala Buddhist track.  

All crises the country is facing, have very clear Sinhala racist projections, which has nothing to do with patriotism. The ugly and insane public participation of Buddhist monks on the streets collecting money for penalties imposed by a Court of Law is a manifestation of Rajapaksa’s Sinhala racist politics.   

This Yahapalana leadership, neither the President nor the PM is bold enough to challenge that and tell the people, this is no issue for Buddhist monks to play politics with and it insults all true Buddhists.  
All other issues too were interfered with Sinhala Buddhist interests and given into by this Yahapalana leadership.  

The Asgiriya Chapter issued a special statement on 16 August, condemning any attempt at passing a No-Confidence Motion against (then) Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe. They claimed he had done much service to Buddhism. All we know of is that Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe went around with that Myanmar’s Ashin Wirathu type local Bikkhu Gnanasara and others of his ilk.   

In fact the Asgiriya Chapter conferred an honorary title Dharma Neethi Visharada on Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe.   

What this Dharma Neethiya (Religious law) is and where it matters is not known even in this lay Sinhala Buddhist society.  

On June 28 (2017) the Chief Prelate of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagi Sangha Sabha Ven. Dr. Ittapane Dhammalankara Thera along with deputy high priests handed over a letter to President Sirisena that said about the proposed new Constitution.  
It said:   

“We do not agree with alternate proposals and unnecessary discussions regarding the position bestowed in the Constitution on Buddhism and the Unitary State concept….” they noted among many such complaints.  

Asgiriya High Priest Venerable Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Thera with endorsement from his Karaka Sabha went a long step further to say this country does not need a new Constitution.  

This Government’s leadership is been bullied by the Mahanayakes.  
That was what made the Chief Prelates of Ramanna and Amarapura Nikayas absent, when President Sirisena signed the Gazette notification at the Magul Maduwa that declared all leaders of the 1818 rebellion as patriotic heroes.   

Such action was not possible with President Premadasa who took oaths at the Pattirippuwa and with Rajapaksa who had the closed road opened for night races.
With no such political aggressiveness in decision making by the present leaders of this Government, the fact that these Mahanayakes also tacitly condone the political indiscipline and violence of the saffron robes, provides Rajapaksa driven Sinhala Buddhist political campaign a legitimacy to lead politics in the South.   

Thus it is Sinhala politics that decides where the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe Government is politically heading.  

The OMP (Office on Missing Persons) Bill that had to be adopted in Parliament over a year ago went into cold storage due to Sinhala politics. The amendments to the Witness and Victim Protection Act are almost forgotten due to Sinhala politics. Whatever is moved in snail pace in the North in an effort to keep the TNA leadership pacified is being done so with promises for a Unitary State and all privileges to Buddha Sasana.
The inability of the TNA leadership to read this Sinhala politics and their irrational trust on this Sinhala political leadership of the present Yahapalana Government has turned the TNA leadership completely ineffective.   

If the ITAK leadership in the TNA still believed the promises it was given by this Government, would prevail over demands by the Sinhala Buddhist politics, they are not living with reality.   

This is the first time in history- both SLFP and UNP leaders together-take the Tamil leadership on a blind path.   

That was not the past experience when the SLFP and the UNP played opposing roles when one was in the Opposition.  

The ITAK leadership in the TNA was confident a new Constitution with all the answers the Tamil people aspired for, would be in place before end December 2016. The respected Tamil leader Sampanthan told Tamil voters it would be so, during his election campaign in August 2015.   

Two years later, today he is pleading with Mahinda Rajapaksa to support Tamil proposals for the Constitution. He is asking the US Ambassador to pressure the Government to abide by the co-sponsored UNHRC Resolution. He wants the international community to push the Government to honour promises on “transitional justice”.  

It is time the veteran politician Sampanthan understood, this Government is on a Sinhala agenda.   

That it is trying to figure out how it could meet the challenge of Rajapaksa at PC and LG elections they cannot avoid.   

In the South, it is a mad fray, to win over Sinhala votes. Tamil and Muslims votes they believe can be taken care of by accommodating Tamil and Muslim leaders as allies in a Government.  

Worst is their dilemma in the economic front. They have read everything wrong in global economics.   

Wickremesinghe and his UNP failed to read post-2008 global economic slump in its right perspective.   

Their reading was traditional and old fashioned. Since the 2008 global economic slump, the Western economies have not gained global dominance they had before the slump.  
Now, it is China that rides rough shod over others, investing heavily in most Asian, African and Latin American countries. Chinese projects don’t come with human rights and accountability conditions tied to them.  Most leaders in ‘developing’ countries in charge of ‘free markets’ therefore, feel comfortable with China. So are Yahapalanaya leaders in this Government.  All Sinhala political leaders, blue, green or red, need to cater to majoritarian politics to live privileged and corrupt in this free market economy. The free market economy has left out 70 per cent of the population that live outside urban centres, in rural society.   

That is from where Rajapaksa collected loads of Sinhala votes polling 5.8 million at the 2015 January Presidential election.   

 This free market economy cannot provide any decent development for rural life. No Megapolis programme accounts for their life, other than as cheap and exploited labour.  
They are thus being mobilised by whipping up Sinhala Buddhist patriotism. They are told; they should save this Sinhala Buddhist country, not from those who rob their economic benefits, but from Tamil separatists and Muslim fundamentalists.
Constitutions are also made for such politics. It is for that the Unitary State is given such uncompromising importance and how Buddhism is provided the foremost place in the Constitution.   

What is meant or defined by foremost place isn’t quite certain and it need not be. What is important is to tell these marginalised Sinhala Buddhists, they are taken care of even through the Constitution. What the high priests are more concerned about is the next phrase that is written into the Constitution.   

That in Chapter II the Constitution 9 says, “….it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana” (emphasis added).  
It thus means it is Bikkhus, who are protected and fostered even at their worst, whatever happens to Buddhism.  

This hoax is explained quite rationally by a dissenting Buddhist practitioner in robes who calls himself Sri Samantha Badra Himi.   

For the first time I tend to agree with him when he says,
“How can Buddhism be destroyed? That is what is in your cleansed ‘self’. Buddhism is not the Temple of the Tooth relic, or the Sri Maha Bodhiya or me or anyone else. Buddhism is in our minds and in our intellectual, righteous ‘self’. When there are intelligent people, Buddhism lives….” (facebook.com/ashramaya/videos /1195998610486828 )  

Buddhism thus cannot be ‘Sinhala Buddhism’ and has nothing to do with ‘patriotism’ either.   

Even if one adopts Buddhism as ‘Sinhala Buddhism’ that cannot in any way be a tool to vote a corrupt and a plundering lot of politicians at every election. But this is what the constitutionally protected and fostered Buddha Sasana is all about in politics. 

Sri Lankan baby trade: Minister admits illegal adoption trade


A archive image of a Sri Lankan woman holding a wrapped up baby, both are anonymous and cropped
The Sri Lankan health minister said foreign adoptions were temporarily banned in the 1980s because of "baby farms"

BBC21 September 2017

Sri Lankan authorities have admitted in a Dutch documentary that thousands of babies born there were fraudulently sold for adoption abroad in the 1980s.

Up to 11,000 children may have been sold to European families, with both parties being given fake documents.

Some were reportedly born into "baby farms" that sold children to the West.

Sri Lanka's health minister told the Dutch current affairs programme Zembla he would set up a DNA database to help children find their birth mothers.

About 4,000 children are thought to be have ended up with families in the Netherlands, with others going to other European countries such as Sweden, Denmark, Germany and the UK.

One adoptee called Rowan van Veelen, told the BBC earlier this year that he had travelled back to Sri Lanka to try to find his birth mother 27 years on.

He was part of a Netherlands-based social media network that tried to match Sri Lankan birth mothers to their estranged adopted children.

"The adopted children and the mothers got the wrong information, which makes it really hard," he explained.

Rowan and a friend being interviewed
Image captionThe Facebook page dedicated to reuniting Sri Lankan adoptees with their parents has hundreds of members
"We want to make a DNA bank with all adopted children from [the] Netherlands who can search if we have siblings there.

"Then we could ask other countries like Sweden, Denmark and Germany to give their DNA also in the bank too."

Adoption documents 'falsified'

The Dutch filmmakers from Zembla started looking into the allegations after the Dutch Council for the Administration of Criminal Justice and Protection of Juveniles advised the government in November 2016 to consider banning foreign adoptions because of unethical practices in some of the children's origin countries.

Norbert Reinjens, a researcher for Zembla, told the BBC that they had found evidence that all kind of documents were falsified by adoption authorities - including birth certificates, the names of children and the identity of biological parents.

"In some institutions there were 'acting mothers' who were paid to pretend to be the biological parents while handing them over," he said.

A woman photographs an estranged mother holding up her details for Facebook
Image captionPeople now aim to match the correct information and records with estranged children in Europe
In the documentary locals allege that some hospital workers worked alongside the networks.

Some new mothers at a hospital in Matugama, western Sri Lanka, were reportedly told their children had died, when they were actually sold abroad for adoption.

One woman told the documentary makers she was paid 2,000 rupees (£23; $30) by someone connected to the hospital to act as a baby's mother.

Looking for answers

Azzam Ameen, BBC Sinhala, Negombo

Many mothers had come to the western coastal city of Negombo from all over Sri Lanka in search for answers. They had heard of a visiting group trying to find their missing children. They had barely any documents. One mother had a picture of her child taken in 1989, but had no other information on the child's adoptive family or location.

One mother told me she checked the adoption papers of her daughter and found all the information to be false. It seemed that a "fake mother" had been produced in court for the adoption.

Another woman confessed to have accepted money to claim she was the mother of a girl. She said she did it as she was desperate for cash.

Only mothers had showed up, not fathers. Most of the women said they had to give up their babies for adoption because their husbands had abandoned them in the first place.

In Sri Lanka, we often hear about happy reunions of Dutch adoptees and Sri Lankan parents in newspapers. But after talking to these mothers it became clear there could have been a massive scandal in the '80s and '90s

Sri Lanka temporarily banned intra-country adoptions in 1987 when one "baby farm" was raided, and 20 newborns were found inside.

Reports from the time said the women there were being held in "prisonlike conditions", surrounded by a 10 ft (3m) wall.

Sri Lankan Health Minister Rajitha Senaratne denied the government held any responsibility or knowledge of the networks.

But in an interview with the documentary makers he said he would look into setting up a special office to try to match the children involved.

"It is very wrong, it is against human rights of those families - so that has to be investigated. I myself will take the responsibility for that investigation."

One mother, Renuka Abeysinghe, told the BBC that her daughter was taken in 1992.

A woman is interviewed and looks distressed
Image captionMothers interviewed by the BBC said they had no knowledge of their children's whereabouts
"I will be very happy if I meet her again. I gave her for adoption because we were poor and we didn't have a way to live.

"They told me they took her to Germany but we had no information after that."

Another, Ms Sirimavathi said she was alone when she gave up her daughter.

"I don't have parents, and all my close relatives were abroad when I got my child. I didn't have anyone. I didn't have a place to stay, " she said.

A woman being interviewed is pictured crying
Image captionMs Sirimavathi said she had "no one" when she gave up her child
"I cried a lot when giving away the baby, still I am crying.

"My wish is to see her once, I don't want anything from her."

The Dutch State Secretary for Security and Justice confirmed to Zembla he was looking into the allegations.

Additional reporting from Azzam Ameen, BBC Sinhala

Corrupt crooked Lalith –Anusha duo get bail ; did Romesh De Silva ‘fix’ it ?

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 21.Sep.2017, 11.30AM)   Lalith Weeratunge the ex secretary of corrupt deposed president Mahinda Rajapakse , and Anusha Pelpita the ex Director General of Telecom Regulatory Commission (TRC) who were sentenced to jail over the colossal fraud of distributing white cloth during the last presidential elections campaign to confer benefits on ex president Mahinda Rajapakse engendering  a staggering loss of Rs. 600 million of public funds, were enlarged on bail yesterday (20) by Gihan Kulathunga the High Court judge , Colombo.
Each of them was  released on a cash bail of Rs. 1million and three surety bails . In addition , it was ordered , one of those sureties must be a resident of the area of jurisdiction of the court. Of the other two sureties ,one of them must be a close relative of the accused  while the other  must be a government servant. 
The foreign travel of the accused were banned , and their passports were ordered to be impounded by the court .

The accused requested bail based on the appeal filed by them in the appeal court against the  3 year jail sentence that was delivered on them  by the high court. As a rule  the request for bail must  preliminarily be made to the court that delivered the sentence . It is only when that court refuses , an appeal is filed .
The bail was granted taking into consideration  the fact that the accused had been delivered  a sentence of 3 years in jail. In case bail is not granted , the  time taken by court to hear the trial and  conclude the case in the appeal court  may exceed the 3 year period of jail sentence of the accused .
If the jail sentence was say of about  10 years  duration , bail could have been refused , but as this jail term is only 3 years which is relatively small  when compared with the period taken for a case to be heard and concluded in Sri Lanka , bail can be granted if there are no objections.. 
The Attorney General ‘s department too did  not raise strong objections to granting of bail. It was evident though the pro Rajapakses tried to politicize this case , the AG’s department has not viewed this case from a political standpoint. It was very clear the  crooked duo Lalith – Pelpita sought to exploit this case to gain political mileage , yet  those sordid efforts  and manipulations  will cease to have  effect from yesterday. 
The appeal of the crooked duo was entrusted to a popular lawyer Romesh De Silva who  is best noted as a specialist in  ‘fixing’ cases by influencing the judges who hear the case . A case in point was the appeal filed by Geetha Kumarasinghe earlier on.

In the circumstances , the legal fraternity is harboring strong doubts that this appeal  of the corrupt crooked duo lalith –Anusha could also have been similarly ‘fixed’ because it was heard before a panel of judges including judge Deepali Wijesundara who among the appeal court judges is best known for worst unscrupulous and squalid  activities .
Machiavellian ,mendacious, deposed and presently people discarded president Mahinda Rajapakse addresses her as ‘Chooti Nangi’ .  For her daughter’s wedding , Mahinda gifted a luxurious car as  wedding present . That was during the  period when Sarath Fonseka’s ‘white flag’ case was being heard.  Deepali and Razik the judges in that  case found Fonseka guilty but Justice Waruwewa reversed that decision subsequently .
Any form  of gratification is a bribe . This is why judges of rectitude, honesty and integrity who respect their noble profession , their self dignity and independent judiciary steer clear of politicians , because these unscrupulous political rascals and two legged animals can exert their evil influence on them , and make the judges also one like them. That situation turns most squalid  when judges accept gifts . The bigger the gift offered bigger the evil plans of the offerer to use the judge .
---------------------------
by     (2017-09-21 06:43:09)