Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, August 28, 2017

7 SLFP MPs likely to lose seat in Parliament?

7 SLFP MPs likely to lose seat in Parliament?
logoBy Ayshwarya Yapa-August 28, 2017 
Information has been received through political sources that the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) membership of 7 parliamentarians may be revoked on the grounds that they violated the party constitution.
According to the source, the 7 MPs in question are Gampaha District’s MPs Prasanna Ranatunga and Prasanna Ranaweera, Puttalam District’s MP Sanath Nishantha, Ratnapura District’s MP Pavithradevi Wanniarachchi, Kandy District’s MPs Lohan Ratwatte and Dilum Amunugama, and Kalutara District’s MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena.
Under the 19th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka, if the 7 parliamentarians are removed from their party, they will by default also lose their MP statuses.

How can the concept of ‘Smart City’ be realistic in an era of digital marketing in a Sri Lankan context?

cvxcv
logoTuesday, 29 August 2017

It has been some time now, me being an expat and understanding, swimming into the deep-end into a developed city and studying its transformation.

As an expat, I personally have seen the potential development that my motherland can develop into. Digital marketing and strategy being my pet subject, I invested time in articulating some thoughts on how the Colombo City can be digitally transformed and cascade into other main cities such as Kandy and Galle.

Start with one city with citywide dimensions, delivering impact across all sectors and industries as its initial implementation. This will account to develop into a smart economy and smart living dimensions, fuelling entrepreneurship and competitiveness in the south Asian region while enhancing quality of life for all. The article articulates think-tank crafted strategic goals understanding thematic pillars. This will help envision a city where our resources are always optimised, where we protect both our people and our information, in order to enrich the experience of every person in our city.
cvxcv

The Colombo city and suburbs having a population of approximately 2.3 m accounts for 45%, and most importantly it is the hub for industrial, commercial and administrative centre in Sri Lanka. In making the Colombo city and suburbs ‘Smart’ if the above can be implemented on particular phases a smooth flow of digitally transformed city would come into light.

Upon understanding the above facts of transforming our city of Colombo, the article will discuss on how digital marketing will play the accountability role of establishing a good marketing platform to match-pace with a digitally-driven economy.

Where Colombo stands at present from being ‘Smart’

The Colombo city has been an important port city along the Indian Ocean for centuries. The natural port being in the west of the Island, in the centre of Colombo buildings from the British colonial can be found, moreover the other areas of the city has modern offices and apartments as well as a financial complex in its heart.

Colombo is a small city compared to other South Asia capitals and easy to make. But Colombo’s infrastructure has become outdated. Traffic jams and electricity shortages are frequent, several slums have sprouted in the east of the city, where approximately 70,000 people live.

According to a World Bank report published, experts point to a lack of planning and hidden urbanisation. The municipal administrators have insufficient statistics and knowledge of informal housing areas on the periphery of the city. Nobody knows exactly how many people live in shanty towns or have at least a rough idea about how many people need sanitary facilities, drinking water or electricity. In addition, the tropical climate, frequent typhoons and flooding are make the lives of the inhabitants quite difficult.

But the World Bank experts believe Colombo has the potential to be a modern city. The port city is located halfway between Europe, Africa and East Asia hence it could be an international business and trade hub, but before all of this the city will have to modernise and it largely depends on how the Colombo Metropolitan Region is managed and positioned, not only with in the country, but also regionally and globally.

German technology giant Siemens is involved in the planning of the mega project with an approximate investment of $40 billion to modernise the capital and its surrounding districts. Siemens has come-up with a special software, which allows developers to stimulate different options and its ramifications. This software will help in calculating costs and amount of work involved and for example if you put in a low emission zone, it will model what impact that would have on air quality and how much additional jobs this technology would create. But in the end, the urban planners in-charge have to decide what they want and what they can afford.

Businesses and enterprises will only come to Colombo if the city is able to guarantee that they can work and produce without any interruptions. And in order to take the traffic load off the city’s streets, there will be the need to build a railway connecting the north and the south of Colombo. Planning ahead will definitely save money and prevent costly improvements.

As result of a ‘Smart City’, what can be done?

A smart city is an urban development vision to integrate information and communication technology (ICT) and Internet of things (IoT) technology in a secure fashion to manage a city›s assets. These assets include local departments› information systems, schools, libraries, transportation systems, hospitals, power plants, water supply networks, waste management, law enforcement, and other community services. A smart city is promoted to use urban informatics and technology to improve the efficiency of services. All of this will lead into the quality of living of the citizens of the country.

The Government can implement a strategy to reinforce the delivery across specific vertical sectors in the city.  This allows, services to be developed with current and future technology, all within the remit of the city’s strategy.

Below it would be explained the strategy dimensions in order to digitally transform the culture around smart governance, mobility, environment and people.

Smart economy

Smart logistics can exemplify economic infrastructure in air and seaports, helping drive competitiveness in the Asian Region. International exposure initiatives for smart tourism and MICE (meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions) sectors create seamless and impactful experiences for visitors. Upon a well-established ICT infrastructure with a goal to achieve and the primary objective needs to include creating the right environment for productivity.

Smart economic hubs can continue to develop, through mandated ICT funding and an unparalleled unified strategy to create and sustain innovation initiatives. Entrepreneurship needs to be encouraged further, giving Colombo a clear opportunity to create a blueprint for emerging economies.

Smart living

Sri Lanka having the inception and known for the hospitality industry, a visionary focus of the Colombo city can be customer service and to make it a model of the Government, aiming to delight the citizens through its services, rather simply providing services. The Government can conduct an excellence programme, as an initiative which continues to prompt excellence in customer service.

Smart homes, offices and connected neighbourhoods can become the norm. This happens through the city’s growing infrastructure and development and it been the green-field opportunity for smart city connectedness. Smart technology can back-up city government and private sector developments. Smart digital signage, interactive municipal furniture, smart parking and fibre to the home can be some of them.

Education being one of the USPs in Colombo, it can be laid as a city priority can be used to lay a foundation for truly connected schools and universities. Initiatives in the city can include smart learning apps that provide digital access via smart-phones to the entire primary school curriculum material. E-libraries and other such smart learning initiatives can be included within the road map of Smart Colombo. This can enhance living as a dimension.

Connected hospitals within the public and private sector will emerge rapidly as a result of the city’s focus on enhancing healthcare with technology. Further services will include significant progress within the smart homecare and m-health arenas. Along with the post-war scenario, the country has been peaceful, safe and a secure environment. Connected infrastructure and services within public safety, emergency response and health safety domains can aim to further enhance safety for the residents and visitors.

Smart mobility

Mobility, within the definition of the city being ‘Smart’, impacts both transport of people as well as transfer of ideas. This requires a level of coordinated innovation in the city’s hard and soft infrastructure that has little precedent globally.

Focus areas within Smart mobility include: transportation, roads infrastructure and traffic management—including Colombo taxis and the app-connected wheelers (Uber, Pick Me), the bus network, — each to be serviced by smart touch-points. Enhanced asset management initiatives, such as smart parking will drive true seamlessness and efficiency.

Sustainable mobility initiatives can be implemented in the form of electric vehicle charging stations and legislative support around renewable transportation. The city’s ICT infrastructure, together with future initiatives will enable impactful movement and implementation of ideas.

Smart governance

E-Government initiatives can be established, which will lead to unparalleled unification of government services. End consumer via web, mobile and social media driven channels, empowering a connected class of e-citizens and e-residents, can consume services. Through this a vital opportunity will pave-path for open data, which can be used for governance, deployment and eventual impact on city decision-making.

Smart environment

Modern-day planning for securing the city’s resources requires innovation across the board — in managing assets, as well as ensuring sustainability from the use of resources.

Focal areas of the strategy will include energy, waste management and environmental conditions for better quality of life.

The spectrum of smart services can includes a combination of smart grids, smart meters, urban infrastructure, emissions reduction, water and waste efficiency as well as balancing pollution of all forms.

Smart people
Happiness of the city’s people – its citizens, residents, business community and tourists should be the overarching goal of Smart Colombo. An integral part of its realisation lies with empowering people to participate actively, while developing human capital with various forms of education.

Public involvement and education via e-community centres, digital and social communication channels and alternative skills development should act as the primary focus areas. The end goal remains creating a native culture of continual learning, participating and innovating within society.

Smart ICT Infrastructure

Smart ICT infrastructure and its related services will act as key enablers underlying all smart city services. Smart ICT infrastructure is thus a transversal dimension, spanning all smart city dimensions.

Focal areas include citywide connectivity and access, sensing and actuation to drive efficiency, data orchestration and analysis for real-time intelligence, smart service delivery apps, and a centralised monitoring and management layer.

Pivotal role of digital marketing propelling as an anchor for digital transformation

The Colombo city being ‘Smart’ can be ambitious but achievable plan, which will eventually open-doors of the city to a whole spectrum of digital services and infrastructure to result in effective digital marketing.

There is one common denominator in digital marketing implementation and smart city data devices marriage; the installation of devices in the fabric of a city blanketed with Wi-Fi. In principle, these devices will speak to each other, collect data and will operate services such as traffic lights. The end goal is a tech-utopia where urban planning, infrastructure and services all operate at maximum efficiency.

A natural by-product of a smart city is a cache of data on every inhabitant, or in marketwing terms, potential customer. The data would reveal the routine, preferences, shopping habits and general behaviour of every person. When this is married with existing data sets, such as social media profiles or online purchases, the result is a veritable gold mine of information.

The beauty is, with devices covering a city, conceivably, messages could be delivered to customers pretty much anywhere, at any time and via any medium that has a display.

On a more positive note, perhaps the most exciting opportunity for brands and marketers is in relation to finally fully bridging the gap between the offline and online retail worlds. Successfully attributing a marketing initiative directly to a sale has long been the bane of everyone associated with the advertising industry. Marketers can work with data scientists to build models that use the information from devices in a smart city and marry them with their online behaviour.

Marriage of digital marketing with digital transformation will have to understand the platforms and devices to optimise digital marketing effectiveness, wherever crowds gather, Social retail can enhance the smart city vibe while increasing revenue for business in the city. Through this easy navigation can be created for visitors using digital signage and smartphone notifications. Offers, deals and discounts can be pushed directly to visitors’ phones as they pass-by shops.

When closer to landmarks, notifications can be sent (museum, church, official building, etc.), public service announcements can be viewed (floods, evacuation, early warnings, etc.), travel guides can be provided, frequent updates of arrival times and delays of public transportation. These are some of the advantages that can be maximised through digital marketing connect.

In conclusion – Next article developments

In my series of articles, as the next step it would be further drilled into the subject matter of digital marketing in a concept of a smart city. It would be understood in a Sri Lankan context what companies and how the said companies should amalgamate in formalising the micro-environment in order to create the need in the macro-environment to develop Colombo City into a ‘Smart City’.

[The writer is MCIM, MBA (Wales), Higher Dip. in Brand Management and a digital marketing enthusiast.]

AG to file indictments on seven reports


Kamani Alwis- Monday, August 28, 2017
The Attorney General(AG) will file indictments relating to seven reports concerning alleged acts of Fraud Corruption, Abuse of Power State Resources and Privileges running into millions of rupees committed during the Rajapaksa regime.
The seven reports compiled by the Presidential Commission Investigating alleged acts of Fraud Corruption Abuse of Power State Resources and Privileges relating to misuse of State funds and Assets running into millions of rupees during the Rajapaksa regime have been handed over to the Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya PC by President Maithripala Sirisena last week for necessary legal action.
The Attorney General said indictments will be filed against the accused after completing a legal study on the seven reports. He said this study had already commenced into the seven reports handed over by the President.
Since the PRECIFAC had investigated and recorded evidence on the seven reports indictments would be made on the basis of this evidence.
The seven reports handed over by the President to the Attorney Generals Department related to investigations made into SriLankan Airlines, Sri Lankan Catering Services, Fishery Harbours Corporation coming under the purview of the Fisheries Ministry, Hambantota Port Water Filling Ceremony, Sri Lanka Transport Board, Upcountry Development Authority, Consumer Services Authority and investigations relating former North Central Provincial Council Chief Minister S M Ranjith Samarakoon.
PRECIFAC chaired by Appeal Court Judge Preethi Padma Surasena and comprising High Court Judges Vikum Kaluarachchi, Piyasena Ranasinghe and Gihan Kulatunge and former Auditor General P.Pematilleke had submitted the seven reports to President Sirisena after conducting investigations and recording evidence.
On behalf of the Attorney General Senior Attorney Janaka Bandara, Attorney Sudarshana de Silva and former Attorney Chaminda Athukorale assisted the commission. 

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe: Hail the new sawdust filled martyr in town

Sacked minister now says he was ashamed to be in the Cabinet: The question is why did he remain so long enveloped in shame?

Sunday, August 27, 2017


The Sunday Times Sri LankaGreater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends and country. In Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe’s case it wasn’t his life that he was prepared to lay down but the ministerial positions he held; and which he, with disdain, declared as but a trifle – one he could and would easily ‘shuffle off from his mortal coil’ in the nation’s interest, with the same ease as a moulting snake in the grass, and ‘in the ecdysis blue’, sloughs its seasonal skin.

No-confidence motion was by Mahinda, or JO MPs?

No-confidence motion was by Mahinda, or JO MPs?

Aug 28, 2017

The joint opposition has handed over to the speaker a no-confidence motion, signed by 39 MPs, demanding the removal of Rajitha Senaratne as the health minister. Previously too, the JO moved no-confidence motions against government ministers, but none materialized. The JO has now made no-confidence motions a joke due to these baseless moves.

The ex-president has told a government minister that he had agreed to move the no-confidence motion at the insistence of the MPs around him. Therefore, it is clear that even he believes this to be a falsehood and a joke. He has also told the minister that JO MPs were likely to claim that the no-confidence motion was moved at his insistence.
 
Making his remark true, a top JO figure has told a government minister that the no-confidence motion was wanted by the former president. The ex-president is trying to save face by blaming it on the MPs around him, while they too, do likewise.
 
It is unfortunate for the country’s politics that the power-hungry Mahinda Rajapaksa and those around him have made a joke out of no-confidence motions before the public.

‘Police day’ made into a Police day trauma like Namal’s car races by torture prone Poojitha! Public harassed !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 27.Aug.2017, 5.20PM)    In the same way as during the period of the nefarious decade when night races were held causing monumental inconvenience to the public  , yesterday (26) at the center of the sacred Kandy town the ‘Police day’ celebration which transformed into a  Police day koloma (Police day trauma) is being held creating unnecessary traffic snarls ,road blocks,    and causing severe  hardships to the public and pedestrians.

IGP Poojitha Jayasundara alias ‘Poojitha the torturer’ who is by now confirmed before the public as a criminal , though   so far he has not been hauled up in courts ,   because of his incurable extreme megalomaniac dementia  chose  Kandy city which is his village area to hold the Police day celebrations this year . It is noteworthy all these years the Police day was celebrated in Colombo at the Police Park ground. However , as everything is topsy turvy with the present eccentric and megalomaniac IGP so the latter had celebrated the Police day as though to deliberately harass the public and hamper  their  daily activities in Kandy. 
Poojtha who has a morbid affinity to inflict torture on his own subordinates ,using  the police day  to harass and hinder the public is not a matter for surprise .No matter what ,because it is the public who have been targeted to  torment and traumatize by this  IGP police koloma , the people of Kandy are furiously and rightly questioning , why did the minister in charge of the Police and the police commission allow this eccentric IGP to perform this traumatizing ‘drama’ to the detriment of the public while knowing very well his unhinged nature ? When everyone knows him as  Imbecile General of Police (not Inspector General of Police) , how come the minister and the Commission did not take extraordinary precaution ? Is the minister  of law and order himself  suffering from a mental disorder ? the suffering public have questioned with concern.  
On the 25th the public were  greatly inconvenienced beyond measure  with the closure of  main roads when grandiose  preparations were being made for the Police day celebrations . The photographs depict how the police clowns made the  Kandy town a mad circus arena , and closed main  roads on yesterday (26).
The people of Kandy openly expressed their bitter resentment against this police insanity under the IGP alias imbecile general of police . They said this harassment of the public is only second to the sufferings and inconvenience they faced during the cruel and corrupt Rajapakse era when Namal  closed the Kandy town for  him to  hold car races.
---------------------------
by     (2017-08-27 12:10:37)

EU lets Israel destroy West Bank schools it funded


Palestinian children attend class in a tent on 24 August, after Israeli occupation forces dismantled their school in the West Bank village of Jubbet al-Dib, near Bethlehem, two days earlier.

Ali Abunimah-28 August 2017

Dozens of Palestinian children were due to begin classes in Jubbet al-Dib, a village near Bethlehem, last week.

But on the evening of 22 August, Israeli occupation forces destroyed their new school.

It consisted of six prefabricated buildings largely funded by the European Union and several of its governments.

During the five-hour assault in Jubbet al-Dib, Israeli forces declared the area a closed military zone and used stun grenades, tear gas and rubber-coated metal bullets to keep residents away as they dismantled and confiscated the buildings.

“It was heartbreaking to see children and their teachers turning up for their first day of school under the blazing sun, with no classrooms or anywhere to seek shelter in, while in the immediate vicinity the work to expand illegal settlements goes on uninterrupted,” Itay Epshtain of the Norwegian Refugee Council said after visiting the village.

“The demolition of a school building the night before the start of the year epitomizes the administrative cruelty and systematic harassment by authorities designed to drive Palestinians from their land,” the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem stated.

An EU spokesperson told The Electronic Intifada on Monday that the value of the buildings and equipment seized by Israeli forces in Jubbet al-Dib and earlier in the Abu Nuwwar community is $37,000 – and that they were paid for jointly by the EU, Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain and Sweden.

Earlier in August, Israeli forces confiscated solar panels that provided electricity to the kindergarten of the Abu Nuwwar community, located in the so-called E-1 area of the occupied West Bank, where Israel plans to expand its mega-settlement of Maaleh Adumim.

Weak EU response

In a weakly worded statement last week, the European Union expressed its “strong concern” – not even “condemnation” – about this and other demolitions.

The statement neglected even to mention that the buildings were funded by European taxpayers.

The EU did, however, mention Israel’s policy of “designating land for exclusive Israeli use and of denying Palestinian development” – an indirect acknowledgement of what others have more forthrightly and accurately labeled apartheid.

Yet on Monday, the EU confirmed that it is content to let the destruction pass without any tangible action to hold Israel accountable.

Asked what the EU planned to do to seek restitution and accountability from Israel, the spokesperson said: “The EU has raised these matters publicly and also privately in its dialogue with the Israeli authorities.”

That’s diplomatic speak for: we’ve done all we’re going to do, which amounts to nothing.

Spate of attacks

The demolition in Jubbet al-Dib was one of several recent Israeli attacks on Palestinian schools.

On 21 August, occupation forces raided the Palestinian Bedouin community of Jabal al-Baba near the Jerusalem-area village of al-Eizariya and demolished a prefab building that was to serve as a kindergarten for about 25 local children who have no other school.

According to B’Tselem, Israeli forces took the desks, chairs and blackboard – equipment valued at about $2,800, a large sum for a community with so little.

“The latest spate of school demolitions and confiscations in the West Bank forms part of a wider attack on education in Palestine,” the Norwegian Refugee Council noted.

According to the agency, about 55 schools in the West Bank are currently threatened with demolition or so-called “stop work” orders by occupation forces.

Many are located in Area C, the roughly 60 percent of the West Bank under full Israeli military control under the Oslo accords signed between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization in the early 1990s.

Many of these schools are donor-funded, including by European Union governments.

“Israel denies the majority of Palestinian planning permit requests in Area C, thereby leaving Palestinians with no option but to reconstruct and develop without permits, while Israeli settlements – established in violation of international law – continue to expand,” the Norwegian Refugee Council stated.

Massive destruction

Israel’s destruction of Palestinian infrastructure funded by international donors is relentless and systematic.

In recent years, Israel has destroyed at least $74 million worth of EU-funded projects, including schools, playgrounds and agricultural initiatives.

Analysts have suggested that EU officials have downplayed the full extent of Israel’s destruction in order to avoid embarrassment.

Last year, the Tel Aviv newspaper Haaretz reported that there was mounting pressure from European Parliament members on EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini to confront Israel more forcefully over the matter.

But instead, the EU appears to be intensifying its unconditional support for Israel. A high-level official recently pledged EU support for Israel’s efforts to silence criticism of its policies, under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism.

EU officials also continue to smear the nonviolent boycott, divestment and sanctions movement with claims that the EU cannot substantiate that BDS activities have led to a rise in anti-Semitic incidents.

The EU also continues to fund Israeli torturers and arms makers.

Empty words

In July, Israel confiscated solar and diesel electricity generating equipment in Jubbet al-Dib donated by the Netherlands and valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The Dutch government sent Israel a letter protesting the move, saying it was “currently assessing what next steps can be taken.”

Haaretz reported that “these softly worded statements cover the anger brewing in the government of the Netherlands, a close friend of Israel’s, at the damage to the humanitarian project.”

And in the wake of the demolition in Jubbet al-Dib this month, the Belgian government let its anger be known.

“These new demolitions and seizures of essential infrastructure are unacceptable,” the country’s foreign minister Didier Reynders and development minister Alexander De Croo said in a joint statement.

“By undermining such humanitarian projects, Israel contravenes its international obligations as an occupying power, in particular the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War,” the Belgian government added.

Strong words indeed, but followed by soothing reassurances to Israel that it need fear no consequences.

“Explanations as well as compensation will be demanded from the Israeli government,” the ministers said. “Belgium is not the only international donor affected by this kind of destruction. It will continue to work together with its partners, as in the past, to ask the Israeli authorities to end these demolitions.”

There is no hint of what Belgium might do if Israel ignores its polite requests, but if the past is a guide, it will – like the EU – do absolutely nothing.

Slap us again

“The destruction of educational structures funded by European money is not just a violation of international law,” said the Norwegian Refugee Council’s Palestine director Hanibal Abiy Worku. “It is also a slap in the face to the international community providing aid to the occupied Palestinian population in a bid to ensure safe places of learning for children.”

With their inaction, the EU and its member governments are once again sending Israel a very clear message: please slap us and our taxpaying citizens again, and keep on destroying the schools and lives of Palestinians.

Car bomb kills eight at Baghdad market: medics

Iraqi security forces inspect the site of a car bomb attack in Jamila market in Sadr City district of Baghdad, Iraq August 28, 2017.

Reuters Staff-AUGUST 28, 2017

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A car bomb killed at least eight people in a crowded vegetable market in a Shi’ite Muslim district of Baghdad on Monday, police and medics said, in an attack claimed by Islamic State.

The car detonated in the eastern district of Jamila, police said, as Iraqi government forces were preparing to declare victory over the Sunni Muslim militants of Islamic State more than 400 km (250 miles) further north in the city of Tal Afar.

Medics and police sources said eight people died and 25 were wounded.

Interior Ministry spokesman Brigadier General Saad Maan said four people were killed and 12 wounded, including two policemen.

Islamic State’s Amaq news agency said the bombing had been meant to target Shi’ite Muslims, but reported it took place in the neighbouring Sadr City district.


It was not immediately clear if a suicide bomber had driven the vehicle to the target or if it was a parked car bomb, police sources said.

PKK confirms capture of two Turkish spies in Iraq


Capture of two MIT operatives led to the expulsion of Iraqi Kurdish official from Ankara on Friday
Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) fighters greet their comrades as they arrive in the northern Iraqi city of Dohuk (AFP)
Alex MacDonald's picture
Alex MacDonald-Monday 28 August 2017

The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) on Monday publicly confirmed the capture of two Turkish secret service officers in Iraq last week.
Diyar Xerib, a leading member of the Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) - a PKK-affiliated transnational body - told a local news channel in Iraq that they had captured the National Intelligence Organisation (MIT) officers, but were not divulging their identities yet.
“Turkey should be glad we haven’t shown the people we captured in the media yet," he told the Rojnews channel.
"We could just parade them to the press now and publish their names.”
The incident caused a furore last week - according to reports by the NRT news channel, the two MIT officers had been staying in the city of Sulaymaniyah in Iraqi Kurdistan and had been planning to assassinate a senior PKK leader.
Turkey and the PKK have been engaged in a decades long guerilla war which has seen more than 40,000 killed. Throughout, the PKK have maintained headquarters in the Qandil mountains in northern Iraq, which has regularly been the target of Turkish military operations.
However, the MIT operation in Sulemaniyah appears to have been botched, with reports on Friday alleging the officials had instead been captured.
The controversy led to Turkey to expel Behroz Galali, the Ankara representative of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), a centre-left Iraqi Kurdish party whose stronghold is in Sulaymaniyah.
Although the PUK are seen as being somewhat closer to the PKK than Iraqi Kurdistan's ruling Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), Xerib said that there was some confusion as to why they had been implicated.
“Many people are asking why Turkey did such a thing," he said. "They question the reasons behind it...these questions need to be answered and the issue needs to be brought into light.”
He also scolded the PUK for appearing to place the blame for the controversy on the PKK and warned them against becoming an "operational force of the Turkish state."
"The PKK could put these MIT operatives who wanted to turn Sulaymaniyah into a city of chaos and the center of terror attacks against PKK administrators in front of the cameras," he warned.
"The reason the PKK hasn’t done so is that they don’t want to make the people of Sulemaniyah and the PUK look guilty."
The PUK said on Thursday that it had not been informed about the MIT operation, however, and warned that Turkey did "not have the right to conduct operations in another country."
Galali left Turkey on Thursday with his family in tow after he was informed by the Turkish government that the Ankara office of the PUK was to close.
Speaking to a news conference upon his arrival in Iraqi Kurdistan, Galali implied that the closure of the office was linked to Ankara's opposition to an upcoming referendum on Kurdish independence set for 25 September.
"Turkey is concerned over the PUK's security institutions and that caused the office to be closed [in Ankara]," Galali said.
"Turkey opposes the referendum and it is certain it won't be held on September 25."
The incident came at the same time Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu was in the KRG capital of Erbil on a visit to meet, among others, Deputy Prime Minister Qubad Talabani, who is a PUK member.
Turkey and the KRG enjoy good relations and have strong international trade links.
However, tensions have risen since the announcement of the independence referendum, which Turkey fears could inflame nationalist aspirations among its own restive Kurdish minority.
Netanyahu accuses Iran of building missile production sites in Syria
During meeting with UN chief António Guterres, Israeli PM says Iran is turning Syria into ‘base of military entrenchment’

Benjamin Netanyahu’s comments reflect anxiety over the Iranian influence on Israel’s northern border. Photograph: Heidi Levine / POOL/EPA

 in Jerusalem-Monday 28 August 2017

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has accused Iran of building sites to produce missiles in Syria and Lebanon during a meeting with the UN secretary general, António Guterres – part of increasingly bellicose rhetoric from Israel and the US against Tehran.

The remarks, made by Netanyahu at the beginning of a meeting with Guterres on Monday, come against a background of growing Israeli anxiety over the expanding Iranian influence on its northern border.

Netanyahu accused Iran of turning Syria into a “base of military entrenchment as part of its declared goal to eradicate Israel”.

He added: “It is also building sites to produce precision-guided missiles towards that end, in both Syria and in Lebanon. This is something Israel cannot accept. This is something the UN should not accept.”

Israel has pointed to Tehran’s steadily increasing influence in the region during the six-year-old Syrian conflict, whether via its own Revolutionary Guard forces or Shia Muslim proxies, especially Hezbollah.

Netanyahu’s remarks follow recent comments by the fiercely pro-Israel US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley. She accused the UN peacekeeping commander in Lebanon, Maj Gen Michael Beary, of being “blind” to the spread of illegal arms and reiterated a call for the force to do more about it.

“Gen Beary says there are no Hezbollah weapons,” Haley said. “That’s an embarrassing lack of understanding on what’s going on around him.”

Beary pushed back at US and Israeli criticism, saying his force had no evidence of weapons being illegally transferred and stockpiled in the area, and that “if there was a large cache of weapons, we would know about it”.

Earlier in August, Israeli media broadcast what it said were images from Israel’s Eros B satellite, showing a site in north-west Syria near the town of Baniyas that it claimed was intended to be a missile storage site.

It has become clear that the Netanyahu government and senior Israeli defence officials badly misjudged the trajectory of the war in Syria, which Israel had hoped would turn into a quagmire for the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad’s key ally, Iran, and for Lebanon’s Iranian-backed Hezbollah.

However, after the intervention of Russia on Assad’s side, the war has swung in favour of the Syrian president and his allies, prompting Israeli officials to become increasingly concerned by a “day after” scenario that would mean Iranian power being projected on to its doorstep.

Guterres arrived in Israel on Sunday for a three-night trip. In his first official visit to the country, he is expected to discuss the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, as well as ways to promote the moribund peace process between Israel and Palestine.


“I dream that I will have the chance to see in the Holy Land two states able to live together in mutual recognition, but also in peace and security,” Guterres said at Netanyahu’s office on Monday.

Guterres spoke of improving economic and social conditions for Palestinians to provide them with a “dividend” and incentive for peace. He is due in Ramallah on Tuesday for talks with the Palestinian prime minister, Rami Hamdallah.

Netanyahu’s remarks to Guterres on Iran follow his warning to the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, this month that Israel might be prepared to act unilaterally to prevent Tehran establishing a garrison on the country’s doorstep.

Meeting Putin in the Black Sea resort of Sochi, Netanyahu said Iran – which Russian officials have said has had a stabilising influence in Syria – was fighting to cement an arc of influence from the Gulf to the Mediterranean.

“Iran is already well on its way to controlling Iraq, Yemen and, to a large extent, is already in practice in control of Lebanon,” Netanyahu told Putin.

“We cannot forget for a single minute that Iran threatens every day to annihilate Israel,” he added.

“Israel opposes Iran’s continued entrenchment in Syria. We will be sure to defend ourselves with all means against this and any threat.”

India and South Asia


In case of India fractious domestic politics and inequitable division of the developmental benefit among the growing population may stay the rate of development of the economy. The inequity in the distribution of income can be gauged by the fact that both in China and India increase in per capita income has been flat between 1820 to 1950 but it increased by 68% by 1973 and 245% by 2002 and continues to grow despite global financial difficulties.

by Kazi Anwarul Masud- 


( August 28, 2017, Dhaka, Sri Lanka Guardian) Why, one may ask, despite common cultural heritage and long bonds of history and added to these factors was Indian humanitarian intervention during the Bangladesh Liberation War Indo-Bangladesh relations, notwithstanding public diplomacy by the authorities of the two countries, a portion of the people of Bangladesh do not like India’s “hegemonic” attitude towards this country.

Lacking the resources of Pew Research Center Polls it is difficult to find out the degree of anti-Indianism in Bangladesh. The ascendency of BJP in India (democratically elected and an entirely internal matter for the Indian people) it is difficult to remain indifferent about political developments in a country that affects others’ life and no less almost every facet of the economy. Bangladesh cannot afford American “new sovereigntists” or “American exceptionalism” (neither could the USA in today’s multipolarism with the rising of the rest, particularly emerging economies of China and India).

Harish Khare, a former Media Advisor of the Indian Prime Minister who remained in Prime Minister’s Office from June 2009 to January 2012). wrote (“A Dangerous Arrogance of Power Is Setting on 14/07/2017) As democratic institutions – cabinet, bureaucracy, media, presidency and judiciary – weaken, the Modi establishment is riding high on overconfidence. This is bad news for the Indian polity…. Never before was such a convergence of timidity and opportunism seen as now among these three institutions; there seems to be a veritable race to reduce them to the role of a spear-carrier for the prime minister.” Another critic Promod K Nayar (University of Hyderabad- The Signs of a Dystopian Democracy Are All around Us 25/07/2017) writes: “Two possible forms of the dystopian turn are visible now. In one form, there is an enhanced emphasis on homogenisation and cultural standardisation in the ‘larger interests of the nation’.

This immediately brings to the fore the so-called problem of cultural differences. Ethnic, racial and cultural identities are constitutive of the very humanity of the members of those groups…. In another form, dystopian democracy is marked not by the fear of an across-the-border ‘other’, which would be the well-recognised xenophobia of all nationalisms. Rather, it is marked by what can only be thought of, clumsily, as endo-xenophobia, the cultivated and constructed fear of those citizens increasingly seen as ‘foreign’ by virtue of their diet, their taste in sporting teams or their preference for film stars and films of certain nationalities/ethnicities”.

Veteran Indian journalist Prem Shsankar Jha sees in Prime Minister Narendar Modi’s “grandiose” speeches a camouflage for the creation of a state “ that will confront, not accommodate, its neighbours; this state will not tolerate cultural heterogeneity, but seek to replace it with a single homogenised culture that Modi mistakenly believes to be Hindutva. Muslims, and other minorities, will be tolerated in this entity so long as they know their place. Religious pluralism will be tolerated (but not accepted), as former vice president Hamid Ansari pointed out in Banglalore but cultural pluralism will not. For the minorities, the path to success will be through cultural assimilation. In sum, Modi is intent upon changing the very idea of nationhood upon which India’s political identity has been based not just for the past 70, but the past 2,000 years.” Jha adds that Narendra Modi is leading India into deadly peril. If he continues down this road, India’s failure as a state is guaranteed (THE WIRE Modi Is Taking India to a Dangerous Place by Prem Shankar Jha on 17/08/2017). Should one assume that Bangladesh being a predominantly Muslim majority country Indian policy in South Asia will change (Nepal is predominantly Hindu and Bhutan is Buddhist while Pakistan and Afghanistan have Muslim population)? Public diplomacy does not give any credence that religion will have any impact on Indo-Bangladesh relations.

Could religion be an impediment in cementing Bangladesh- India relations? German philosopher Jurgen Habermas to the surprise of many has recently emphasized both religions’ prominence in the contemporary public sphere and its potential contributions to critical thought. Habermas argues that the once widely accepted hypothesis of progressive secularization fails to account for the multiple trajectories of modernization in the contemporary world. He calls attention to the contemporary significance of “post metaphysical” thought and “post secular” consciousness – even in Western societies that have embraced a rationalistic understanding of public reason. (November 2013).

In the Indian sub-continent one could try to trace the history of India since 7th century when Islam entered in the then India with the conquest of Sindh by Mohammed bin Quasem. While early Muslim rule was from 1206 to 1398 the Mughal era was from 1526 to 1857 when the first war on independence against the British ended in defeat. Despite protestation to the contrary Indo-Bangladesh relations can only be better.

For the critics or believers in ultra-nationalism/ (Islamist terrorists) the question facing Bangladesh authorities, irrespective of the fact whichever party remains in power, is whether Bangladesh can afford to follow an anti-India policy without thwarting its socio-economic development? One can always argue that national interest should guide national policy even if the policy goes contrary to the policy of a powerful neighbor. It is easier said than done. In the case of Brexit almost half of the British people voted against the Brexit while the other half voted to remain. Each voter had the primacy of national interest in mind. Henry Kissinger defended his policy on Vietnam War as national interest dictated to him at that time. Henry Morgenthau described national interest as survival—the protection of physical, political and cultural identity against encroachments by other nation-states. Equally Brookings Institution defined national interest as “What a nation feels to be necessary to its security and well being … National interest reflects the general and continuing ends for which a nation acts.” In the ultimate analysis national interest may be defined as the policy adopted by the ruling elites at a particular time given a particular context.

After Pakistan’s breakup consequent upon the liberation of Bangladesh India emerged as the leading power in South Asia and it has been most acutely felt by her immediate neighbors. The argument proffered that Indian intervention was not totally altruistic but to deal a death blow to its greatest enemy can be explained in terms of “realism” in that India was never so scrupulous in honoring the sovereignty of others when its vital interests were involved. But then it is the nature of both established and emerging powers to flex their muscles as the US has done since the enunciation of Monroe Doctrine. If diplomacy requires deceit and use of force or hard power as defined by Joseph Nye jr then India has been an able follower of Chanakya in her dealings with neighbors.

Disquiet in India’s relations with Bangladesh had begun with the non-implementation of 1974 Mujib-Indira agreement that was further aggravated by the construction of Farakka Barrage turning a significant part of Bangladesh into a desert, affecting navigation, agriculture, environmental degradation, and hurting the livelihood of millions of people. Farakka’s adverse effects have made a section of Bangladeshis suspicious of the proposed Tipaimukh Dam to be built on the river Barak in Manipur state of India. The proposed construction is controversial in both India and Bangladesh. Many people were put off by huge imbalance in trade favoring India partly due to para- tariff and non-tariff barrier erected by India on exports from Bangladesh. It is also believed that Indian bureaucracy is reluctant to open Indian market to Bangladeshi products. Non-demarcation of maritime boundary with India that had been taken to arbitration by Bangladesh has been resolved to the satisfaction of both the parties.

Many other agreements concluded recently have contributed to the strengthening of bilateral relations. A few mentionable are:

1. Framework Agreement on Cooperation for Development Agreement lays down a framework for enhancing bilateral cooperation, including trade, investment and economic cooperation; connectivity; water resources; management of natural disasters; generation, transmission and distribution of power, scientific, educational and cultural cooperation; people to people exchanges; environmental protection; sub regional cooperation in the power sector, water resources management, physical connectivity, environment and sustainable development.

2. Protocol to the 1974 Land Boundary Agreement

3. Facilitating Overland Transit Traffic between Bangladesh and Nepal

4. MOU on Fisheries and MOU in Renewable energy

5. MOU in Renewable energy.

Globalization in any case has forced even introvert nations to come out in the open. If the main driver of the Arab Spring has been securing citizens political rights the civilianization of reclusive Myanmar appears to be an admission that no nation in the globalized world can remain an island- be it one of plenty or underdeveloped. Changing nature of security threats from traditional to non-traditional ones makes it imperative for nations of the world to unite. Hence it has become necessary, more so now with the Western economies in deep trouble, to have G-20 nations to have summits and high level contacts to smooth out the wrinkles in global politics and economy.

Ever since the end of the Cold War and fleeting US unipolar moment various scenarios are being constructed for the next world order. One such scenario urges Washington, Beijing and New Delhi to consider, if a war happens in the 21st century, it will be America-China or China-India. According to this scenario NATO intervention in Libya has shown lack of coherence of Western alliance that had served the stability of the post-Second World War world. Besides neoconservatives like Robert Kagan are convinced of Europe’s lack of centrality in global politics if not the soft power that is essential for global peace. This school of thought considers China and India to be globalization’s lead integrating agents. Russia and Japan are not considered to be serious first tier candidates for global power. In this equation Europe too is discounted as is Brazil among the BRIC nations.

But the shining China may face impediment as in two decades or so China will lose considerable number of workers who will join the aging senior group of citizens. By contrast America will add few dozen million workers and India are expected to add 100 million to the workforce. In terms of per capita income by 2030 that of the US is expected to be $ 60000/- while that of China will be $ 20000/- and that of India is expected to be $ 10000/-. The US despite its indebtedness (US Federal Gross Debt to GDP ratio updated in August 2017 was 106.10) GDP will reign over the others because both China and India will remain tethered to the proverbial ball and chain of impoverished rural poor.

Besides China may face developmental impediments in the forms of environmental damage, resource constraint, demographic aging, inequitable distribution of income among different sectors of the society, better standard of living leading people to demand greater voice in governance translated into weaker hold of the Communist Party over the people.

In case of India fractious domestic politics and inequitable division of the developmental benefit among the growing population may stay the rate of development of the economy. The inequity in the distribution of income can be gauged by the fact that both in China and India increase in per capita income has been flat between 1820 to 1950 but it increased by 68% by 1973 and 245% by 2002 and continues to grow despite global financial difficulties. The situation has been no different if we take the case of the US where between 2002 and 2007 65% of all income growth went to the top 1% of the population. The world has virtually been divided into two classes–plutocrats and the rest. Despite such skewed rich and poor equation demonstrated by occupy the Wall Street march in New York the policy makers in the Game Room of the powerful countries would be working on inclusion of China and India along with the US as future arbiters of global fate and guarantor of peace than the old alliances with Europe and Japan.

Zbigniew Brezinski and Fred Bergsten (Petersen Institute for International Economics) had advocated formation of G-2 with the US and China (The United State and China: a G-2 in the making Brookings-Oct 2011). The essence of the proposal is that these two biggest economies working together can provide global public good that the world required. The convergence between the two at present appears to be difficult because China saves too much and the US consumes too much creating disequilibrium in their economies and imbalance in trade. China uses its surplus cash to buy US Treasury bonds thus increasing American indebtedness. Unless the trade surplus countries like China starts buying and consuming more US made products the equilibrium will not be achieved. Politically and militarily G-2 appears to be a distant proposition because a rising power has the tendency to expand its influence, often through hard power, that an established power like the US would have to acquiesce in though such expansion may impinge on the areas of influence of the established power. So far Chinese use of influence in global affairs has not caused any ripples in the world. But there can be no guarantee that with the passage of time power transition will remain smooth.

For example in the case of North Korea the verbal exchange going on between President Trump and Kim Jung-un using nuclear vocabulary has introduced a grave security concern for the world. Besides disputed Spratly Islands remain unresolved and the world is not certain yet how the Chinese would finally react to the claims by other countries’ sovereignty over the Islands. Consequently as the established power cannot be sure of the real intent of the rising power it is likely to hedge its bet by roping in-In this case, countries like India, Japan, South Korea and Vietnam to counter China.

Relations with Bangladesh was bedevilled in the past with problems relating to maritime boundary demarcation ( now resolved through International Arbitration), land boundary disputes (resolved through exchange of enclaves in adverse possession), trade imbalance in favor of India and impediment imposed by India on Bangladeshi exports through para-tariff and non-tariff barrier, border killings of Bangladeshi nationals by Indian Border Security Force, Indian allegation of illegal Bangladeshi nationals entry and stay in India etc. Relations have taken a turn for the better after the assumption of power in Bangladesh by Awami League led combine of political parties. Relations with Nepal had been strained after the assumption of power as Prime Minister 2006-2009 and again 2016-2017 by Maoist leader Pushpa Kumar Dahal who openly blamed Indian machination for the downfall of his short lived government and subsequent failure to form a government. In a party conference he even urged his followers to free Nepal from Indian domination. Current Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba maintains good relations with India. In early August Nepal’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister has categorically said that Nepal would not take side on the China-India-Bhutan Doklam border dispute. He told the media that Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba will visit India from August 23-August 27 while Chinese Vice Premier will come to Nepal on August 14 on an official visit. It is not known if the Doklam issue would be discussed in Delhi or in Kathmandu. Meanwhile Bhutan has protested to China, saying the area belonged to it and accused Beijing of violating agreements that aim to maintain the status quo until the boundary dispute is resolved. India says the Chinese action to lay the road was unilateral and changes the status quo. It fears the road would allow China to cut off India’s access to its north eastern states. Nepal, a landlocked country, is virtually dominated by India commercially where Indian currency can be used in the markets.

Bhutan, another landlocked country, is also heavily dependent on India but the people are ferociously independent minded and refuses to integrate with the globalized world and believe in Gross Domestic Happiness instead of GDP as is understood throughout the world. Bhutan, a country with seven hundred people, has extremely cordial relationship with India.

With Afghanistan India has developed special relationship much to the chagrin of Pakistan though it is believed that Indian efforts are directed to counter Chinese influence and not to contain Pakistani influence in Kabul. At the moment Pak-Afghan relations are going through rough waters as both the Afghan and the US government is highly critical of the safe heaven enjoyed by the Haqqani group in Pakistan from where the terrorists launch their operations. This issue was mentioned by President Trump during the recent visit to the US by the Indian Prime Minister.

It would, therefore, appear that that it would serve Indian interest to mend her fences with her neighbors enabling the US efforts to prop up India as a counter to China as would Indian ambition for a permanent seat in the UNSC. Though not at the same economic level India could try to play the role in South Asia as Germany is playing in helping out European countries i.e. Greece to get the country out of the economic difficulties she is facing at the moment. Use of hard power by India in South Asia is going to be counterproductive if she thinks the smaller neighbors have little option but to bow down to Indian dictates.

The net result may be to push the South Asian countries into the arms of China as a hedge to counter Indian efforts to dominate the region. Indian policy planners may wish to consider that Indian democratic structure is more attractive to her South Asian neighbors for establishing fruitful bilateral relations with India than with China, albeit a rising power, but with an authoritarian system of governance China yet remains inscrutable to many countries having liberal political system. In the ultimate analysis the scenario of an India countering China in Asia may be a more theoretical than a realistic proposition US wish notwithstanding. The people in South Asia would prefer both giants to have complimentary than a competitive relationship that would help millions of people of this area to get out of the poverty trap and leave a prosperous life for their children and grand children.