Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, August 25, 2017

SriLankan Airlines: ‘Drug Bust’ – Flight Steward Nabbed At Doha Airport

logo
SriLankan Airlines Flight Steward was nabbed by Customs Officials for the carriage of a narcotic substance at Hamad International Airport Doha, Qatar last Wednesday Colombo Telegraph reliably learns.
The arrest had taken place when the male Cabin Crew Member of SriLankan Airlines had completed his flight duties and was passing through Customs with his operating crew.
Sources associated to the airline speaking on condition of anonymity said that the young 24 year old Cabin Crew Member had carried a narcotic substance in his suit case.
The Airline official went on to say that it is yet to be established what type of drug and quantity it was and also if he was carrying it for his personal consumption or if he was a trafficking it.
SriLankan Airlines has had to deal with several drug related issues pertaining to their Cabin Crew in the past.
In 2013 a stewardess who was removed from flying duties and assigned ground duties was nabbed by Police when she was purchasing drugs in Pamankade.
A Manager from SriLankan Airlines when contacted confirmed that the In Flight Services management has been suspicious of several Cabin Crew Members who they feel are currently using banned substances. He said, “The airline has been very supportive in rehabilitating several Cabin Crew Members in the past who have been addicted to various narcotic substances and even alcoholism. Some who have managed to kick the habit have even progressed to hold managerial positions too within the Airline. We need to test all the Cabin Crew for the usage of narcotic substances. This should be made mandatory and also these tests should be completed randomly throughout the year. There are blood tests available now where it can identify the type of drugs used”.

Read More

COPE suspends 24 ‘Rajitha’ appointments

Rajitha-2017.08.25

August 25, 2017
24 appointments made to the State Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing Corporation without any concern regarding their qualifications by the Minister of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine Dr. Rajitha Senaratne have been suspended and the Corporation has been ordered to inspect their qualifications by the Committee On Public Enterprises (COPE).
Instructions had been given to recruit the employees in a letter using the letter heads of the Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine and the signature of Specialist Doctor Sujatha Senaratna, wife of Minister Rajitha Senaratna, who acts as his private secretary.
Most of these appointees are from Wadduwa, Katukurunda, Bulathsinhala, Badureliya areas in Kalutara District and three of them have been attached as coordinating secretaries to Minister Senaratna. As such, they had drawn salaries from the State Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing Corporation while employed as Minister Senaratna’s coordinating secretaries. It is revealed that there are no provisions to attach employees recruited to the State Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing Corporation for any other duties and doing so is illegal.
Raji2It has also been revealed to COPE that 6 employees recruited in this manner to State Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing Corporation have drawn salaries without reporting to any duty at the Corporation.
Also, 18 of this group have been recruited on 9th November, 2015 but the approval of the Director Board had been received only on 18th May, 2016. This means they have been appointed before receiving the approval of the Director Board.
As such, their appointments have been suspended so that their qualifications and the process they were recruited could be investigated, to find out how some of them have drawn salaries without performing any duties and how they had functioned as coordinating secretaries of the Minister when there are no provisions for such a process.

Drug trafficking at an all-time high



ELMO GOONERATNE-2017-08-25

Drug abuse and drug trafficking have reached record high levels in Asia and in Sri Lanka and this is a pressing issue. People who abuse drugs end up with serious health complications and in the long-term, this has an impact on the economy of the country. Drug kingpins and distributors make truckloads of money and many people see it as a method of earning 'quick money.'

The President of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, has combatted the drug trade by unleashing a crackdown on drug kingpins, distributors, and abusers. Due to this reason, drug abuse and trafficking in the Philippines has reduced to a great extent. Duterte has even urged Filipinos with guns to "shoot and kill drug dealers who resist arrest."

Fastest method

In Asia, the fastest method of earning money illegally is drug trafficking. It enables people to become millionaires overnight. Drug kingpins in Sri Lanka are filthy rich and live the high life. The distributor also makes a ton of money. The drug kingpin smuggles drugs in containers, and hands them over to the distributor, who then sells them to the addicts. In Sri Lanka, both the rich and poor have become addicted to drugs. Another concern is the younger generation (especially schoolchildren) have got hooked on drugs. Some youngsters dissolve pills in branded soft drinks to avoid detection and when they don't get a 'kick' out of it, they start searching for imported drugs which are much stronger.

Recently, a popular singer organized a party at a hotel in Colombo for a group of youngsters. At first, it looked like a party with clean fun, but later on the residents in the area discovered that a majority of the youngsters were dazed and crawling on the floor. The residents in the area were also not very comfortable with the type of music that was being played and so they contacted the Police. A Police team was dispatched and when they raided the hotel, they found that most of the youngsters were half naked and dancing to the music. The Police also found, what at first glance looked like lozenges, which were neatly packed. However, after analyzing the 'lozenges,' the Police concluded that they were not lozenges, but a new kind of drug. The Police also learnt that the singer intended to organize similar parties in other parts of the country. Most of the youngsters who were in attendance attended tuition classes.

Laws governing
tuition classes
In Sri Lanka, there is no law that governs tuition classes. Any Tom, Dick or Harry can start a tuition class. Does the Education Ministry even conduct periodic audits? Are the 'tuition masters' qualified to teach? It has come to light that girls who attend tuition classes are harassed by tuition masters. Some of them end up getting pregnant. Most of the tuition masters are middle-aged men who are married. When I was a media consultant for the then Education Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, he made a bold move and attempted to check on tuition classes. A commission to look into tuition classes was set up and it was headed by the Deputy Director General of Education, D.A. Perera. They prepared a report, but nobody has bothered to read the report and take any action. It is highly probable that the report was chucked in the dustbin. Tuition classes have become a haven for criminals and the authorities need to look into this issue before things go out of control.

The Asia Pacific region has one third of the world's population and also the biggest concentration of drug abusers. This region also produces the largest amount of opium, especially for scientific purposes. Before other drugs entered the market, opium was in demand. Today, opium is cheaper than cannabis.

The Golden Triangle

The Golden Triangle is an area of approximately 950,000 square kilometres (367,000 sq miles) that overlaps the mountains of three countries of Southeast Asia: Myanmar, Laos and Thailand. These areas now produce over 1,000 tons of opium and it has been found that opium is being sold along with heroin and cannabis which are in demand.

The second area which has become very popular is the area called the Golden Crescent located at the crossroads of Central, South, and Western Asia. This space overlaps three nations, Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan, whose mountainous peripheries define the crescent. Opium is sold along with other drugs and is catching on fast.
On the borders of the two golden areas, many laboratories have sprung up, which convert opium into morphine and heroin. In addition to opium, ganja is also cultivated in huge quantities in Pakistan, Nepal, India, Burma, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Thailand. According to researchers, cannabis dominates the market in terms of availability and amounts seized by law enforcement officers. Heroin addiction among youngsters is at record high levels in Asia. According to researchers, the most affected countries are Pakistan, Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. Heroin is the most addictive of all opiates and is the most dangerous drug in the region.

One particular concern is that most heroin abusers are quite young. According to statistics in Sri Lanka, the typical heroin abuser is 16-30 years old. In countries such as Malaysia, Pakistan, India and Thailand children as young as 12 years are addicted to heroin. The drug is freely available and sells like hot cakes. Due to this reason, it is hard to crack down on abusers.

According to a study that was carried out in Sri Lanka, in most of the families either one or both parents are employed overseas. This has led to disintegration of family ties. There is nobody to supervise the children, while the parents are away and due to this reason, most of the children fall into bad company and get misled. Another issue is that these children have a lot of money.

According to a recent survey, the abuse of inhalants is on the rise in Asia. Several countries have put stiff drug laws into place. Several countries have also introduced rehabilitation programmes and counselling for addicts to help them get rid of their addiction.

Narco-terrorism

Narco-terrorism is also on the rise in several countries including Sri Lanka. Pakistan was heroin free for a while, but recent studies suggest that there are 650,000 drug addicts in the country. Some Pakistanis have even attempted to smuggle heroin to Sri Lanka in their suitcases. According to statistics, Sri Lanka is the number one receiver of Pakistani heroin.

Today, Pakistan has become the number one drug dealer in the region. Research suggests that people abuse drugs for a number of reasons. Some of the reasons include, but are not limited to frustration, anxiety, overworking, stress, depression, restlessness, unemployment, family circumstances, and bad company. Sri Lanka is the latest victim of the scourge known as heroin.

According to a report prepared by the National Dangerous Drugs Control Board (NDDCB), there are over 50,000 drug addicts in Sri Lanka who use between 50-100 milligrams of heroin daily. The heroin is estimated to be worth around Rs 3 million and most of the drug addicts are between the ages of 16-30 years. Anti-Narcotic Agencies have found that the number of Sri Lankans who are involved in the drug trade has been steadily increasing over the years. A large number of Sri Lankans have been arrested in France, West Germany, Italy, and Switzerland on drug trafficking charges. The scourge of heroin has also ravaged India where youngsters from upper income groups abuse the drug in Delhi,Mumbai, Kolkata, and Madras. It has been found that in Mumbai alone there are 100,000 heroin addicts. According to the Indian Police, India has become a transit point for heroin which originates in the Middle East and South East Asia.

The largest haul of heroin (615 kg) was seized in Rajasthan and the second largest haul of heroin (572 kg) was seized in Mumbai. Mumbai along with Karachi have become the two main suppliers of heroin. Several Indians and Pakistanis have been arrested in Europe and the Middle East for drug trafficking.

The strongest counter measures adopted by developing countries in the Asia Pacific region are the adoption of capital punishment or life imprisonment. Capital punishment has been introduced in Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Myanmar, Iran, the Philippines, Korea, and Sri Lanka.
The death penalty has only been carried out in the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Singapore and Malaysia are the two countries that have carried out the death penalty effectively. In Malaysia and Singapore, drug abusers and traffickers are sent to jail without a trial.

In the Philippines, it is illegal to wear T-shirts that promote drugs. The President of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, has a zero tolerance policy towards drug traffickers and abusers. In the Philippines, drug abusers and smugglers either face long prison sentences or are shot dead on sight by the Police. Duterte has also struck fear into the hearts of journalists and as a result they think twice before criticizing him.
In Sri Lanka, drug kingpins have a lot of power. They live the high life and own luxury cars, mansions, and casinos. Most of the drug kingpins are close friends of politicians. In Sri Lanka, the drug abuser faces a long prison sentence, but drug kingpins and distributors hide in plain sight and in most cases are untouchable. Drug kingpins like Wele Suda and Rafeek have been taken into custody, but they are given preferential treatment in prison. It is rumoured that they even run their business, while being in prison. The authorities should crack down on both the drug kingpin and drug abuser if we are to rid this country of this menace.

Gazans stranded in Egypt as Rafah rumors swirl


A Palestinian woman waits to cross over into Egypt at Rafah crossing on Gaza’s southern boundary on 16 August.
Ashraf AmraAPA images
24 August 2017

Rumors reported over the past two weeks suggest that the Gaza-Egypt border, closed with only rare exception for the past four years, may be opened for the regular passage of people and goods in September.

But for the unknown number of Palestinians from Gaza currently stranded in Egypt, separated from their families, seeing is believing.

The steel gates at Rafah crossing – the sole point of exit and entry for the vast majority of Gaza’s two million residents – have not budged for more than 100 days, except to allow for some 2,500 Palestinians to leave Gazato perform the annual hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia earlier this month.

For Gaza residents in Egypt awaiting Cairo’s decision to open Rafah, their difficulties grow each day that the border gates remain closed.

Nahil al-Masri, a 60-year-old from Beit Lahiya in northern Gaza, has gone through a great ordeal to visit her son in the United States.

Ordeal

She left Gaza via Rafah at the beginning of February, and stayed in Egypt for more than a month while she waited for a visa. Once al-Masri’s documents were in order, she traveled to the US for a three-month visit. But when she returned in early June, she was not able to get back into Gaza.

Al-Masri spent the fasting month of Ramadan, a time traditionally spent with family, and then the Eid al-Fitr holiday, far from home in Egypt.

She says being in limbo has left her “emotionally tired.”

“I’ve spent most of my money, not to mention my ongoing need for treatment for diabetes and high blood pressure and leg pain that I suffer from,” she told The Electronic Intifada.

Numerous Palestinians have gone through the same ordeal as al-Masri ever since an Israeli-Egyptian siege was imposed on Gaza following the elected Hamas government’s takeover of the territory in 2007.

The passage of people in both directions at Rafah bounced back to pre-siege levels in 2012 after the fall of Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak and the election of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad Morsi.

But that soon changed with the ouster of Morsi in a military coup; tightened restrictions were resumed in June 2013.

Since then, closure of Rafah has been the norm, with the crossing partially opened for only 44 days last year.

Palestinian sources in Gaza have reported that Egypt intends to reopen the crossing following renovations to the terminal underway since March.

Previous reasons given by Egypt for the ongoing closure of Rafah have been security tensions and military confrontations between its army and militants in the northern Sinai peninsula along the boundary with Gaza.

Following the 2013 military coup, Egyptian authorities demolished the homes of thousands of Egyptians along the boundary, further isolating Gaza.

The bitter impasse between Hamas and the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank has also played a role, with senior Fatah officials lobbying Egypt not to reopen the crossing unless it is operated by PA personnel, rather than Hamas officers.

Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ leader in the Gaza Strip, stated last week that the crossing will likely be opened after the Eid al-Adha holiday which falls at the beginning of September.

Stress

But Egypt has made no official declaration to that effect.

And Iman al-Zaharna has waited long enough.

The 53-year-old from Gaza City now regrets having traveled from Gaza to see her son in the United Arab Emirates in February.

When return to Gaza via Rafah proved impossible, she considered making her way back home through Jordan, and from there the West Bank and on to the Erez checkpoint controlled by Israel on Gaza’s northern boundary.

“It proved too difficult despite having most of the official paperwork,” al-Zaharna said.

“My daughter has cancer, and my husband suffers from several illnesses, and I expected to go back to Gaza directly after my return from the Emirates,” she told The Electronic Intifada.

“I would not be away from my family for such a long time, but for the ongoing closure,” al-Zaharna added.

The financial and psychological stress resulting from the situation has “caused me to lose some 30 kilograms,” she said.

Several stranded Palestinians told The Electronic Intifada that they haven’t received any aid from any Palestinian governmental body or charity, and they have to cover all expenses themselves or with the help of family members in Gaza or abroad.

Many live in shared accommodation in densely populated Cairo neighborhoods such as Imbaba and Shubra, but the rent still sets them back hundreds of dollars.

The Palestinian embassy in Cairo has denied that hundreds of Palestinians are stranded in Egypt.
Wael Abu Amer, a spokesperson at the Palestinian side of Rafah, said that the crossing has been open for passage in both directions only 10 days so far this year, in addition to three days for the return of Palestinians stranded in Egypt.


“Communication with the Egyptian authorities is ongoing, as are their excuses for its closure, such as the maintenance of the crossing and the establishment of a new terminal, not to mention security tensions in the Sinai peninsula,” he added.

Children among dead in air raid on Yemen capital

At least 42 people have been killed in airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition this week, according to the UN
People carry the body of a woman they recovered from under the rubble of a house destroyed by a Saudi-led air strike in Sanaa (Reuters)
 
Friday 25 August 2017

Children were among at least nine people killed in an air strike Friday in a residential neighbourhood of Yemen's capital Sanaa, witnesses and medics said.
The attack destroyed two buildings in the southern district of Faj Attan, leaving people buried under debris, they said.
Medics and a rebel security source confirmed at least nine people had died in the strike.
An AFP photographer on the scene said the two buildings, both three storeys high, were destroyed.
Mohammed Ahmad, who lived in one of the buildings, said he was among those who had taken nine bodies to a hospital.
"We extracted them one by one from under the rubble," he said. "Some of them were children from a single family."
"When the rocket hit, one of the buildings was immediately destroyed which caused the building next door to collapse too. Some residents got out, but others were trapped."
Residents and rescuers dug through debris to retrieve the bloodied, dust-covered bodies of several children, who appeared aged under 10 years old.
People at the scene told Reuters the jets were believed to be from a Saudi-led Arab coalition, which has waged a two-year campaign against the Iran-aligned Houthi movement for control of the country.
People search under rubble of a house destroyed by a Saudi-led air strike in Sanaa (Reuters)
The strikes comes as the UN warned that 42 civilians had been killed by airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen over the past week, with multiple children among the dead
"In the week from 17 August to 24 August, 58 civilians have been killed, including 42 by the Saudi-led coalition," UN human rights office spokeswoman Liz Throssell said in Geneva, documenting a series of attacks on non-military targets. 
The Massira television channel run by the Houthi rebels who control the capital said Friday's air strike had killed 14 civilians including six children, blaming the Saudi-led coalition for the strike.
The World Health Organisation estimates nearly 8,400 civilians have been killed and 47,800 wounded since the Saudi-led alliance intervened.
The country also faces a deadly cholera outbreak that has claimed nearly 2,000 lives and affected more than half a million people since late April.
The combination of war, disease and blockades imposed on ports and Yemen's airspace have pushed the country, long the poorest in the Arab world, to the brink of famine. 
At least 71 killed in Myanmar as Rohingya insurgents stage major attack
FILE PHOTO: A Myanmar border guard police officers stand guard in Buthidaung, northern Rakhine state, Myanmar July 13, 2017.

Will Myanmar heed advocacy for Rohingya rights?

Wa Lone and Shoon Naing-AUGUST 24, 2017

YANGON (Reuters) - Muslim militants in Myanmar staged a coordinated attack on 30 police posts and an army base in Rakhine state on Friday, and at least 59 of the insurgents and 12 members of the security forces were killed, the army and government said.

The fighting - still going on in some areas - marked a major escalation in a simmering conflict in the northwestern state since last October, when similar attacks prompted a big military sweep beset by allegations of serious human rights abuses.

The Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA), a group previously known as Harakah al-Yaqin, which instigated the October attacks, claimed responsibility for the early morning offensive, and warned of more.

The treatment of approximately 1.1 million Muslim Rohingya has emerged as majority Buddhist Myanmar’s most contentious human rights issue as it makes a transition from decades of harsh military rule.

It now appears to have spawned a potent insurgency which has grown in size, observers say.
They worry that the attacks - much larger and better organized than those in October - will spark an even more aggressive army response and trigger communal clashes between Muslims and Buddhist ethnic Rakhines.

A news team affiliated with the office of national leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, said that one soldier, one immigration officer, 10 policemen and 59 insurgents had been killed in the fighting.

“In the early morning at 1 a.m., the extremist Bengali insurgents started their attack on the police post ... with the man-made bombs and small weapons,” said the army in a separate statement, referring to the Rohingya by a derogatory term implying they are interlopers from Bangladesh.

The militants also used sticks and swords and destroyed bridges with explosives, the army said.

The Rohingya are denied citizenship and are seen by many in Myanmar as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, despite claiming roots in the region that go back centuries, with communities marginalized and occasionally subjected to communal violence.

FIRE AND FEAR

The military counter-offensive in October resulted in some 87,000 Rohingya fleeing to Bangladesh, where they joined many others who have fled from Myanmar over the past 25 years.

The United Nations said Myanmar’s security forces likely committed crimes against humanity in the offensive that began in October. On Friday, the United Nations condemned the militant attacks and called for all parties to refrain from violence.

The military said about 150 Rohingya attacked an army base in Taung Bazar village in Buthidaung township.

Among the police posts attacked was a station in the majority-Rakhine village of Kyauk Pandu, 40 km (24 miles) south of the major town of Maungdaw.

Police officer Kyaw Win Tun said the insurgents burned down the post and police had been called to gather at a main station.

Residents were fearful as darkness approached.

“We heard that a lot of Muslim villagers are grouping together, they will make more attacks on us when the sun goes down,” said Maung Maung Chay, a Rakhine villager from the hamlet.

The attack took place hours after a panel led by the former U.N. chief Kofi Annan advised the government on long-term solutions for the violence-riven state.

Annan condemned the violence on Friday, saying “no cause can justify such brutality and senseless killing”.

'RUNNING FOR OUR LIVES'

Military sources told Reuters they estimated 1,000 insurgents took part in the offensive and it encompassed both Maungdaw and Buthidaung townships - a much wider area compared with October.

The leader of ARSA, Ata Ullah, has said hundreds of young Rohingya have joined the group, which claims to be waging a legitimate defense against the army and for human rights.

“We have been taking our defensive actions against the Burmese marauding forces in more than 25 different places across the region. More soon!” the group said on Twitter.

Chris Lewa of the Rohingya monitoring group, the Arakan Project, said a major concern was what happened to some 700 Rohingya villagers trapped inside their section of Zay Di Pyin village which had been surrounded by Rakhine vigilantes armed with sticks and swords.

"We are running for our lives," said one of the Zay Di Pyin's Rohingya villagers reached by telephone, adding that houses had been set on fire. The government said the village had been burned down but blamed the fire on the Rohingya.

Amid rising tension over the past few weeks, more than 1,000 new refugees have fled to Bangladesh, where border guards on Friday pushed back 146 people trying to flee the violence.

Mohammed Shafi, who lives in a Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh, said his cousin in Myanmar had told him of the trouble.

"The military is everywhere. People are crying, mourning the dead," Shafi said.
"Things are turning real bad. It's scary."

Additional Krishna N. Das in DHAKA, Yimou Lee in YANGON, Nurul Islam in COX’S BAZAR, Ruma Paul in DHAKA; Writing by Antoni Slodkowski; Editing by Robert Birsel, Nick Macfie


Samsung heir Lee Jae-yong found guilty of corruption


Lee Jae-yong sentenced to five years in jail following trial that led to dismissal of former president Park Geun-hye.



25 Aug 2017 10:25 GMT


A South Korean court has found billionaire Samsung heir Lee Jae-yong guilty of bribery, embezzlement, hiding assets overseas, concealing profit from criminal acts and perjury.

He has been sentenced to five years in prison.

Revelations of Lee's attempt to bribe South Korea's president to further his business ambitions fed public anger that led to the ouster of Park Geun-hye as South Korea's leader.

The court said Lee, 49, hoped bribes for Park and her close friend Choi Soon-sil would secure government support for a merger of two Samsung units that strengthened Lee's control over the conglomerate.

Lee showed no reaction as the verdict was announced.

Al Jazeera's Step Vaessen, reporting from the court in Seoul, called the guilty verdict "unprecedented".
"It wasn't 12 years, as demanded by the prosecutors, because although all charges were proven guilty, the amoung of bribery that was paid - according to judges - was not the $38m that the prosecutors had said but less," she said.

Lee hoped bribes would secure government support for a merger that would strengthen his control over Samsung [Chung Sung-Jun/Pool/Reuters]

"Nobody knows exactly how much right now, but it must have been in the millions of dollars." 

Vaessen said judges considered important the fact the Lee paid briberies to Choi "to get something in reward".
A lawyer for Lee said he would appeal the "unacceptable verdict". 

"We are confident that the ruling will be overturned," Sing Wu-cheoil said. 

Under South Korean law, sentences of more than three years cannot be suspended. Lee's five-year sentence is one of the longest prison terms given to a South Korean business leader.
Park also has a trial under way, while Choi was sentenced to three years in prison in June.
"Apparently Park's trial will continue until October," said Vaessen. "With a five-year sentence against Lee, it's very much expected that it will be very difficult for her to be acquitted."


Samsung, South Korea's largest business group, has acknowledged making contributions to two foundations as well as a consulting firm linked to Choi Soon-sil, a close confidante of the embattled South Korean leader who is also facing corruption charges.

At a December parliament hearing, Lee denied that the company paid bribes to pave the way for a merger in 2015.

Samsung made the biggest contributions of $16.8m to Choi's foundations.

Samsung is separately accused of funnelling millions of dollars to Choi to bankroll her daughter's equestrian training in Germany.

Prosecutors said the donations were made in exchange for government favours, allegations that Lee and Choi had denied.

Other former Samsung executives charged with Lee were also found guilty.

Choi Gee-sung, Lee's mentor, and Chang Choong-ki were sentenced to four years in prison. Two other former executives received suspended jail terms.
Conflict between Trump and Congress escalates as difficult agenda looms

The conflict between President Trump and Congress escalated a day after he threatened to shut down the federal government over funding for a U.S.-Mexico border wall as well as targeted opponents in Congress, aggravating tensions as a difficult legislative agenda looms.

The Fix's Amber Phillips explains the tight deadlines Congress faces this fall, and how President Trump's shutdown threat over funding his border wall and his criticism of the debt ceiling "mess" threaten their agenda. (Video: Jenny Starrs/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

 
Trump is now at odds not only with Democrats, who cemented their objections to funding the wall Wednesday, but also with Republicans, who must reconcile his brash rhetoric with the governing realities of Congress.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) played down the prospect of a shutdown, telling reporters Wednesday that even if the wall debate remains unresolved, Congress probably would pass a stopgap extension of funding to prevent a lapse when the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30.

Other lawmakers chided the president for the attacks he fired off during a campaign-style rally in Phoenix on Tuesday evening — including indirect references to Arizona’s two Republican senators, Jeff Flake and John McCain.

“It’s entirely counterproductive for the president to be picking fights with Republican senators who he will need for important agenda items that they both agree on,” said Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.). 

“Does he think that Democratic senators will be more cooperative than John McCain and Jeff Flake and Susan Collins? It doesn’t seem to make any sense.”

Billy Foster’s Texas ranch sits along the U.S.-Mexico border. He wants more security, but not a physical wall. (Zoeann Murphy/The Washington Post)

Republicans face a litany of high-stakes deadlines when they return to Washington after Labor Day: to extend funding for government agencies, raise the nation’s borrowing limit, and reauthorize programs for flood insurance and children’s health. GOP leaders also hope to begin an ambitious effort to rewrite the federal tax code in a bid to rescue their foundering legislative agenda.

“So I don’t think anyone is interested in having a shutdown,” Ryan said at a tax policy event in Oregon. “I don’t think it’s in our interest to do so.”

Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) moved to dispel reports of a relationship that has frayed through mutual frustrations — McConnell’s exasperation with Trump’s response to deadly violence at a recent white-nationalist rally in Virginia, and Trump’s annoyance about a stalled congressional agenda.

Both men issued statements Wednesday saying they are dedicated to working together on Republican priorities.

“We have a lot of work ahead of us, and we are committed to advancing our shared agenda together, and anyone who suggests otherwise is clearly not part of the conversation,” McConnell said.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that the two “remain united on many shared priorities, including middle-class tax relief, strengthening the military, constructing a southern border wall, and other important issues,” and that they plan to meet when the congressional recess ends after Labor Day.

The gesture of detente came after a New York Times report highlighted their rocky relationship and after Trump’s salvo in Phoenix — an ultimatum aimed squarely at Capitol Hill.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and President Trump's relationship is fraying amid Trump's repeated public attacks and controversial statements. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

“Build that wall,” he said. “Now, the obstructionist Democrats would like us not to do it. But believe me, if we have to close down our government, we’re building that wall.”

At other points during the rally, Trump urged McConnell to ditch the long-standing Senate rules that give the minority party the ability to block major bills. He hinted that he would pardon former Arizona county sheriff Joe Arpaio, a divisive figure who has been found in criminal contempt by a federal judge. And without naming them, he referred to the opposition he has faced from Flake and McCain.

“I will not mention any names — very presidential, isn’t it?” he said, only to take aim at Flake as “weak on crime & border” in a tweet hours later.

The shutdown threat is a response to the leverage granted to the minority party in the Senate. Although Republicans control the House, the Senate and the White House, Democrats have enough votes in the Senate to filibuster any spending bill, giving them the power to make demands regarding what is and isn’t included in a funding package.

Democratic leaders reiterated their opposition to Trump’s proposal Wednesday. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) said Trump would be responsible if the government shut down over the impasse.

“If the President pursues this path, against the wishes of both Republicans and Democrats, as well as the majority of the American people, he will be heading toward a government shutdown which nobody will like and which won’t accomplish anything,” Schumer said in a statement.

Public opinion runs against the border wall, although most Republicans support it. Rasmussen Reports, a conservative-leaning firm, conducted an automated poll of likely voters late last month and found that a solid majority of Americans oppose building a border wall “to help stop illegal immigration,” with 37 percent supporting Trump’s proposal vs. 56 percent opposing it. That is similar to a poll conducted in February by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center that found Americans opposed the wall 62 percent to 35 percent.

Ryan said the border wall should ultimately be funded, reflecting the wishes of most congressional Republicans, including key conservatives who have rallied to Trump’s side. But he has refrained from engaging in Trump’s red-meat “build the wall” rhetoric, in what GOP aides described as an effort to avoid poisoning upcoming negotiations with Democrats.

“We do agree that we need to have the physical barrier on the border. We do need to have border control. We do need to enforce our borders,” Ryan said. “We completely agree on that.”

McConnell has avoided direct calls for a wall while supporting tougher border security generally.

Although Trump claimed Wednesday that the two share that goal, McConnell did not mention the wall in his statement.

Aides also took note Tuesday that although Trump threatened to “close down our government” over the border wall issue, he stopped short of an explicit threat to veto any spending bill that did not include wall funding.

A veto threat could box in GOP leaders as they prepare to negotiate with Democratic leaders who have pledged never to support funding for the border wall. Trump clearly placed the wall at the center of those negotiations, increasing pressure on congressional Republicans to deliver.

Conservatives, however, already smarting from the GOP’s inability to pass health-care legislation, say the party is rightly feeling pressed.

“Obviously no one wants a government shutdown, but if Charles E. Schumer thinks it’s more important to hold up a bill that does what the American people elected their government to do, then let’s have that debate,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a leader of the conservative bloc in the House, said Wednesday.

In recent years, when Democrat Barack Obama was in the White House and Republicans held one or both chambers of Congress, partisan demands over federal spending were hashed out among top leaders in closed-door negotiations. While leaders on both sides set out aggressive positions, they typically refrained from issuing hard ultimatums to preserve space to bargain.

The White House hasn’t decided whether Trump would agree to a stopgap spending bill, a senior administration official said, as he still needs to see details from lawmakers. Trump could block such a measure or agree to a short-term extension in the hopes that it would give lawmakers more time to agree on funding for a new wall.

Jordan said Wednesday that conservatives would be inclined to support an extension but are wary of any attempt to set up a high-stakes deadline ahead of the year-end holidays.

“Is this going to come due at December 23 at midnight? Usually when you do those things you sometimes get some things that aren’t the best for the taxpayer,” he said. “I think the timing’s important.”

During the presidential campaign last year, Trump vowed to force Mexico to fund construction of a wall along the U.S. border that he said could be up to 50 feet tall. Since the election, he has changed course, saying that Congress instead needs to spend taxpayer money to begin building new segments of the wall. Parts of the border already have a wall or fence.

On Wednesday, a committee that is raising money for Trump’s reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee sent an email to supporters calling on them to pressure Senate lawmakers that “the American VOTERS want this beautiful, impenetrable wall constructed” and asked them to digitally sign an “Official Build The Wall Petition.”

House Republicans voted last month to provide $1.6 billion in seed funding for the wall as part of a larger spending package. That bill is not expected to be taken up in the Senate.

Spending legislation that passed into law earlier this year did not include wall funding after Democrats refused to accept it. That impasse increased pressure on Republicans to deliver wall funding in future spending battles.

Dent, a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, accused Democrats of being unreasonable in drawing a hard line against any wall funding — particularly, he said, because many of them supported a 2005 law mandating an expanded border fence. But he said he was concerned about the lack of specifics regarding what the Trump administration is planning for the border.

“It would be nice to know exactly what we we’re talking about and how much money,” he said. “If you’re asking me if it’s worth shutting the government over $1.6 billion, I think that would be a mistake. It would be very bad for the country, terrible politically, and completely counterproductive.”


Sean Sullivan contributed to this report.
Thailand: Ex-PM Yingluck has fled abroad, say sources
25th August 2017

OUSTED Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra has fled the country ahead of a verdict against her in a negligence trial brought by the junta that overthrew her, sources close to the Shinawatra family said on Friday.

Yingluck, 50, whose family has dominated Thai politics for more than 15 years, failed to show up at court for judgment in a case centred on the multi-billion dollar losses incurred by a rice subsidy scheme for farmers.

Overthrown in 2014, Yingluck had faced up to 10 years in prison if found guilty.

“She has definitely left Thailand,” said one source, who is also a member of the Shinawatra’s Puea Thai Party. The sources did not say where she was now.

The Supreme Court issued an arrest warrant after saying it did not believe her excuse she could not attend the court hearing because of an ear problem, but there was no sign of police showing up at her house.


“It is possible she has fled already,” Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan told reporters.

Yingluck’s lawyer, Norrawit Lalaeng, said her team had told him on Friday morning she had an “ear fluid imbalance” and could not attend court. He said he was unaware whether she was still in the country. Her spokeswoman declined to comment.

Yingluck’s brother Thaksin, who heads the political clan, was overthrown in a 2006 coup and fled into exile to escape corruption charges that he said were aimed at demolishing the populist movement he founded.

ThaksinShinawatra
Thaksin was overthrown in a 2006 coup and is in exile. Source: AP

The struggle between that movement and a Bangkok-centered royalist and pro-military elite has been at the heart of years of turmoil in Thailand.

The verdict against Yingluck was widely seen as having the potential to reignite tensions, though the junta has largely snuffed out open opposition. The Supreme Court said the verdict would now be delivered on Sept. 27.

Yingluck last commented on social media on Thursday, saying on her Facebook page that she would not be able to meet supporters at court because of the security measures.

She had been banned from travelling abroad at the start of the trial in 2015 and has attended previous hearings.

Supporters gather

Hundreds of Yingluck supporters had gathered outside the court on Friday where around 4,000 police had been deployed. Some held roses while others wore white gloves with the word “love” on them.

If Yingluck fled it would disappoint her supporters and make her opponents feel vindicated, said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, director of the Institute of Security and International Studies at Chulalongkorn University.

“It does not help with Thailand’s division and polarization,” he said.
love
Yingluck supporters wait for her at the Supreme Court in Bangkok, Thailand, on Aug 25, 2017. Source: Reuters/Jorge Silva

Under the rice subsidy programme, Yingluck’s administration paid rice farmers up to 50 percent more than market prices. It left Thailand with huge rice stockpiles and caused US$8 billion in losses.

Yingluck has said she was only in charge of coming up with the policy but not the day-to-day management of the scheme.

In a related case on Friday, the Supreme Court sentenced Yingluck’s former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyapirom to 42 years in jail after finding him guilty of falsifying government-to-government rice deals between Thailand and China in 2013.


Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who led the coup against Yingluck’s government in the name of ending political turmoil, has promised an election will be held next year.

Yingluck had been banned from politics for five years in 2015 by the junta’s legislature for alleged graft in the rice-purchasing programme. – Reuters

How would parliament look under Proportional Representation?


In this year’s General Election, the Conservative Party only won 42 per cent of the overall vote, compared with Labour’s 40 per cent.

But they ended up with 318 parliamentary seats, while Labour only won 262 seats.

Meanwhile, the SNP got around twice as many votes as the Green Party. But the Greens still only have one MP, compared to the SNP’s 35 MPs.

This disparity is due to the voting system we use, known as First Past The Post (FPTP). It means that, in each constituency, the winner takes all – and votes for other candidates are effectively discounted.
So even if smaller parties win a significant share of the overall nationalvote share, they could still end up with no MPs if they have failed to come out on top within any single constituency.

Technically it’s still one person, one vote. But some parties are more likely to see these votes translate into MPs than others, depending on the distribution and concentration of their supporters.
The UK is the only undisputed democracy in Europe to use FPTP; others use systems that better reflect the overall proportion of votes cast, rather than just who wins in each constituency.

So how would the 2017 General Election have played out under proportional representation?
By combining election data with the results of a large-scale opinion poll, the Electoral Reform Society has this week published projected results.

They have looked at three different versions of proportional representation, which are explained below: Alternative Vote (AV), Additional Member System (AMS) and the Single Transferable Vote system (STV).

It’s important to remember that these are only estimates. It’s impossible to know exactly how voting behaviour might change if the UK switched to proportional voting – or how parties might alter their campaign tactics.

However, it gives us an idea of what the political map may look under proportional representation.
It suggests that the current FPTP system is only beneficial for the SNP and Conservatives, who would both lose out if the voting system was changed. Plaid Cymru would not stand to gain from a change either.

But the other parties would all benefit from switching to a version of proportional representation because second preferences now become relevant.

However, the different types of proportional representation are better for different parties, which perhaps makes it more unlikely that they would ever agree on a new system.

The Lib Dems, the Green Party and Ukip would all fare best under AMS. But this would actually be worse for Labour than the current method.

However, under STV – the version generally regarded as the most representative proportional voting system – Labour would have won more seats than any other party.

The voting systems explained

First Past The Post (FPTP) – This is the system currently used in UK general elections. Each voter picks a single candidate and the person with the most votes wins. They could get one per cent of the votes, or 100 per cent – it doesn’t matter. Just so long as they get more than their rivals.

Alternative Vote (AV) – Instead of just voting for one candidate in your constituency, you can rank them in order of preference. If any candidate gets more than 50 per cent of the first choices, they win. If not, the second preferences are added into the mix – and so on, until a candidate reaches the threshold.

Additional Member System (AMS) – This is a mixed method, which is already used to elect the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and London Assembly. You vote twice: once for a constituency representative, and once for a regional one. The constituency vote uses the FPTP system, while the makeup of regional members reflects the proportion of votes cast for each party.


Single Transferable Vote (STV) – This is possibly the most complex system, but it is also the one most strongly advocated by the Electoral Reform Society and is already used in certain elections in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Instead of electing one MP for each constituency, voters pool together to elect a small team of MPs to represent a wider region. Like with AV, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. To win, they must reach a pre-set quota. If no one reaches this quota level,
the candidate with the least votes is eliminated and their votes are redistributed, until someone reaches the quota. Campaigners say this is the closest to true proportional representation of any voting system currently in use.