Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, August 20, 2017

President Maithri trapped between his commitment to Yahapalanaya and Maha Sangha

Sri Lanka, Anuradhapura. The Buddhist flag in front of Ruwanwelisaya Stupa, sacred to Buddhists around the world. Stock Photo

BY GAGANI WEERAKOON-2017-08-2

As the Unity Government of President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe completed reaching its second milepost without much ado, accusation and resignation seem to be the only options left with the two leaders to keep the unity within.

Sri Lanka's Coalition Government Is Rotting From Within

Sri Lanka's Coalition Government Is Rotting From Within


The foreign minister’s resignation is another reminder of broader concerns about the coalition government.
In recent times, the political scandal you may not have heard about deals with the corridors of power in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Ravi Karunanayake, the island nation’s foreign minister, recently stepped down due to serious (and credible) corruption concerns.
This is a big deal and reiterates how poorly the government has performed since Maithripala Sirisena was elected president in January 2015.
Karunanayake, a member of the United National Party (UNP), previously served as finance minister from 2015 to 2017. He remains a member of parliament.
Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
Writing for Asia Times, journalist Munza Mushtaq has a nice article about recent developments in Colombo.
Here’s part of that piece:
Plagued by allegations of corruption, foreign minister Ravi Karunanayake was forced to resign from his ministerial portfolio early this month. During an inquiry by an independent commission appointed by Sirisena, it came to light that Karunanayake had allowed a person under investigation for irregularities in treasury-bond sales to pay for his luxury penthouse in Colombo.
Here’s more from Mushtaq:
Analysts are already lamenting that the current administration is no better than the previous government under ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa, whose government was also accused of corruption, bribery and nepotism as well as human-rights violations.
Some Sri Lankan politicians, government supporters and Panglossians in the West may argue that Karunanayake’s resignation shows that the system is working and an administration that came to power championing anti-corruption and improved governance is still doing alright.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Moreover, let’s not conflate Karunanayake’s resignation with indictments or any sort of criminal prosecution. Genuine accountability for any crimes committed is still very far away. And we’ve yet to see convictions for corruption that occurred during Rajapaksa’s reign.
Tilak Marapana is now foreign minister. This, too, is alarming news. Marapana is, to put it mildly, a controversial figure who resigned from a previously held ministerial post in November 2015. He has also been implicated in scandalous behavior.
The medley of incompetence, malfeasance, political cowardice and insincerity regarding deeper reform means that we should not expect Sirisena’s administration, an uncomfortable power-sharing arrangement between the UNP and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), to turn things around.

Anti-Corruption “Band Wagon”


logo
Gamini Jayaweera
These days almost all the media outlets in Sri Lanka are up in arms about the alleged corrupt activity performed by none other than the former Foreign and Lotteries Board Minister, Mr. Ravi Karunanayake. Numerous TV programmes, news headlines, editorials in the newspapers, and articles written by academics and others focus their attention on this alleged illegal activity carried out by one of the powerful ministers in the “Yahapalanaya” government.
Why are we surprised about this story? Why are we raising our voices, giving our opinions, and condemning Ravi K. about this dirty business which is practiced by most of our elected representatives? Are we witnessing an “abnormal” activity carried out by one of our top politicians? Haven’t we heard of such stories in the past? Have these politicians got any moral shame and moral fear for these disgraceful activities? Don’t they find some excuses, and lies to justify their repeated unforgivable corrupt activities? Once they get caught they resign (not all) claiming that they have done the “honourable” thing! Then a few months later they get reappointed as Ministers or Advisers to the government with all the perks and benefits. After Ravi. K’s alleged corruption charges, the public is dismayed by the hypocritical behaviour of most politicians of the last regime who have allegedly ransacked the public funds. The way they speak in public about dishonest and fraudulent conduct of the members of the present regime is laughable. 
Previous Regime & “Joint Opposition”
It is in the public arena that most of the Ministers and MPs from the previous regime and the so called “Joint Opposition” are being investigated for alleged inappropriate use of public funds, fraud, and criminal activities. During the last regime, the alleged fraudulent and corrupt activities were part and parcel of their daily life. No actions were taken against these alleged fraudsters because of their relationship with the leader and his henchmen. Let us refresh our memories about some of the ongoing cases, cover ups and charges against the members of the previous regime and their relatives. Some of these cases can be summarised as follows:
  • COPE Reports under Mr. DEW Gunasekera
COPE Interim Report 2013 – The three biggest losers, the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), Mihin Air and Ceylon Fisheries Corporation (CFC) accumulated losses amounting to Rs 9.7 billionduring 2013. 
COPE 2014 – The COPE report listed a series of major transactions with inadequate accountability. 
No investigations were conducted to find out how they lost so many billions of public funds and why there were inadequate accountability.
Is it fair and reasonable to assume that the public funds had been mis-used for personal gains? 
  • Avant-Garde Case – Alleged Rs.11.4 billion unlawful loss to the government. 
Case Ongoing against former Defense Secretary Mr. Gotabaya Rajapakse & others.
  • Divi Neguma Case – Alleged misappropriating Rs.36.5 million of Divi Neguma funds. 
Case Ongoing against former Economic Development Minister Mr. Basil Rajapakse & another.
  • Money Laundering – Alleged involvement in money laundering amounting to Rs.45 million. Investigations Ongoing against Mr. Namal Rajapakse MP
  • Distributing “Sil” Clothes Case – Alleged wrongfully spending Rs. 600 million from Telecommunication Regulation Commission   during presidential election. Case Ongoing against former Secretary to the Ex-President Mr. Mahinda Rajapakse & another
  • Sathosa Case – Alleged loss of Rs.50 million of public funds for deploying 150 Sathosa employees for political activities.
Case Ongoing against former Minister Johnston Fernando and others.
  • Purchase of a House – Alleged illegally acquired Rs.27 million to purchase a house in Colombo.  Case Ongoing against former Sports Minister Mr. Mahindananda Aluthgamage.
  • Threatening and Demanding Money – Alleged threatening and demanding Rs.64 million from a businessman.  Case Ongoing against Mr. Prasanna Ranatunge & others.
  • Laundering Black Money – Alleged Rs.521 million ill-gotten money to purchase land. Case Ongoing against Mr. Yositha Rajapakse & his grandmother.
  • Fraudulent Share Transaction – Allegedly misappropriating Rs.21 million share transactions. Case Ongoing against Mr. Udaya Gammanpila MP & another.
  • SLTB Bribery Case – Allegedly causing Rs.3.2 million losses of public funds to pay the Deputy Chairman as his salary and other benefits. Case Ongoing against former Transport Minister Mr. Kumara Welgama.
The above is a small number of cases which are being investigated and filed charges against the former Ministers and MPs of the previous regime and their close relatives. Reports indicate that nearly 100 of such cases are being investigated.
According to the press reports during the presidential election campaign, one of the former SLFP ministers who is now a powerful member of the “Joint Opposition” had publicly stated “The Government is ours, the army is ours, the police are ours, therefore it is according to what we want that this election is conducted”. Was the former Minister indirectly indicating that the public funds were also their property and hence they could do whatever they would like to do without any checks and balances or accountability?
So, why the “Big Fuss” over Ravi K.’s alleged corruption charges? It appears that this alleged corruption charge against Ravi K. is no better or worse than the ongoing alleged corruption cases against the members of the previous regime.

Read More

Unity government a failure– Justice Minister


Rajapakshe
article_image
by Amal Jayasinghe- 

Embattled Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe criticised President Maithripala Sirisena’s coalition government yesterday saying it had failed the nation and urged Buddhists monks to lead a campaign for political change.

Rajapakshe, who faces possible expulsion from the cabinet, took Health Minister Rajitha Senaratne head on accusing him of interfering in the affairs of the justice ministry and took thinly veiled swipes at Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe too.

Speaking at a public meeting at Rambawe in the Anuradhapura district, the Justice Minister said his cabinet colleague Senaratne was not worried about the spread of chronic kidney disease and dengue and instead poked his nose in the affairs of others.

."Even if everyone in the country is affected by kidney failure and everyone dies of dengue, our health minister has more important things to worry about, such as the AG’s department and the justice system...," he said.

He was referring to Senaratne’s comments last week as cabinet spokesman that the government wanted speedy prosecutions in the high profile corruption cases. Minister Senaratne had said the Attorney-General’s department which initiates prosecutions should function more efficiently. The cabinet was also seeking the establishment of more High Courts to reduce laws delays.

Rajapakshe said a political slogan made popular by the late Junius Jayewardene in 1982 and subsequently borrowed by his nephew, Ranil Wickremesinghe, had become a "curse" on the nation.

"I have no clan to protect, I have no children to crown," both UNP leaders had said in their election campaigns to demonstrate that they were opposed to family rule, but Rajapakshe saw it as the bane of Sri Lanka’s society.

"This slogan and the mind set it created is the curse of our nation. There is a clan of millions to protect and hundreds of thousands of princes and princesses in this country to crown," Rajapakshe said.

"The country is being ruined because we have leaders who do not feel for the country."

He posted the video of his speech at Rambawe on his verified facebook page www.facebook.com/wijeyadasarajapakshe

The minister said the two-party system dominated by his own UNP and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) of President Sirisena had failed the country for the past 70 years.

"We tried a unity government with the UNP and the SLFP coming together and that too has proved to be a failure," he said. "The Buddhist leaders and others should decide on an alternative political leadership."

He did not spell out what that leadership should be, but sources close to him said Rajapakshe calculated that he may be booted from the cabinet soon and should carve a place for himself to face future elections.

He indicated that he was championing Sinhala Buddhist nationalism.

"When I speak about the problems faced by the Sinhala Buddhist majority, they call me a racist, they say I am a ‘gothrikaya’ (a tribal), but when minorities talk about their issues, they are patriots."

Prime Minister Wickremesinghe had been empowered by the UNP working committee to decide on Rajapakshe’s fate amid calls for his immediate sacking from the cabinet.

UNP members had accused the justice minister of dragging his feet and not prosecuting high profile individuals of the former regime despite pledges of the new government to swiftly bring them to justice.

Major corruption cases: Wheels of justice begin to grind following President’s outburst


  • Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe under heavy fire; UNP takes unanimous decision for his removal, but minister remains defiant

  • Sirisena seeks former AG Marapana’s advice on how to expedite cases; Consultation with CJ and AG proposed
  • President takes more control of economy by setting up NEC; SLFP ministers meet business community
Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) ministers launched their own drive last Wednesday to woo the business community as they moved for an increased role in economic development.

Manhandling a lift operator Is the IGP above the Law?

police attack_1police attack_2timthumbTorture2
BY Cassendra Doole-2017-08-20

Inspector General of Police Pujith Jayasundara is again at the centre of a controversy after a CCTV video recording showing him manhandling a lift operator went viral last week. The video first appeared on a notorious online gossip news site and was later shared by a number of media organizations in the country. Several international wire services also picked up the story.

Although the video was leaked only last week, the incident had been recorded in early April on a CCTV camera fixed inside a lift at the Police Headquarters. The video shows the IGP walking into a lift, pushing a person inside and then grabbing him by the collar, apparently making threatening gestures.

When the incident started gathering steam on social media and the public started raising their concerns, the Police gave an official explanation. According to Police Spokesman SP Ruwan Gunasekara the incident was triggered by a minor employee who had failed to follow the rules and regulations of the Police Department. As any other State institution, the Police Department too follows the morning practice of observing religious rituals and meditation programmes, after singing the National Anthem.

The objective is to create 'mental tranquillity and discipline' among the officers and other employees. At the Police Department, the morning meditation programme is strictly enforced as it is something close to the IGP's heart. However, the lift operator was caught by the IGP himself for failing to take part in the meditation ritual. The IGP has apparently given him a warning. It was this incident that had been captured by the CCTV camera, the Police said.

SP Gunasekara was also quick to dismiss the rumours that later surfaced about this video and the circumstances that had led to its recording. One such rumour said the IGP was in fact warning this particular employee over a complaint of alleged sexual harassment by a female receptionist. Yet, the Police Spokesman dismissed this rumour as a baseless claim.

Meanwhile, SP Gunasekara said, during a recent Cabinet media briefing, an investigation has been launched to probe the incident and the necessary future course of action would be initiated on the matter under the civil law.

He added the IGP is mulling legal action against the gossip website for leaking the video and the defamatory remarks made against him.

However, for the general public this was not just a matter of a leaked video, this is a matter about the conduct of the top most officer in charge of country's law enforcement. The public outcry was to conduct an immediate inquiry into the behaviour of the IGP. What with the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution and the institution of independent commissions one would assume that there is transparency in governance and officials in top positions can be held responsible for their actions. But, unfortunately, that is not to be.

The mission of the National Police Commission is: "To transform Sri Lanka Police into an efficient, transparent and responsive service that, respects and protects Human Rights, ensures Public Accountability and upholds the Rule of Law." However, when contacted, the response of the National Police Commission regarding the incident was they had no authority to take action against or inquire into the actions of the Inspector General of Police.

Secretary of the National Police Commission, Ariyadasa Cooray, categorically told Ceylon Today the Commission will not be inquiring into this matter. According to Secretary Cooray, the Commission has jurisdiction over all ranks of the Sri Lanka Police with the exception of the IGP. Thus, the Commission has the power to inquire into actions of all Police officers, report on their discipline and make decisions that would decide their career at the force; all except the IGP.

This exception, according to Cooray, comes from a technicality; the position of the Inspector General of Police is filled in a procedure where the Constitutional Council makes recommendations of applicable candidates and is chosen by the President. Similar to the appointment of the Chief Justice, Supreme Court justices, Attorney General, Auditor General and several other positions, it is the Constitutional Council that decides the ultimate fate of the IGP.

Incidentally, it is the Constitutional Council that has the authority to maintain the independent commissions and monitoring their affairs. This includes the Independent Police Commission. However, in a strange state of affairs, even the Constitutional Council seems as if it doesn't want anything to do with the IGP. Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne, a member of the Constitutional Council told the media that the Council has no authority to intervene in this matter as it only acts as a recommendation body.

He was of the opinion that even though the Council recommends the best person for the IGP position, that responsibility ends then and there. Accordingly, the only body that actually has the capability of inquiring into the case is the National Police Commission.

It appears that the two authorities set up specifically to maintain transparency and good governance in the public service are now trying to wipe their hands off the matter. It makes the people wonder whether this incident too would be brushed under the proverbial carpet, like many other similar cases against top officials in the government, by blaming it on technicalities.

However, the damage this incident has caused to the image of the country is far worse than any authority wants to admit. In the words of Cabinet Spokesman Minister Rajitha Senaratne, "If our Police Chief is behaving like this, then we will have to accept when international organizations accuse our police of routinely using torture on suspects."

JVP leader asks why protest for summoning Shiranthi, Yoshitha




Siriliya Saviya jeep found left abandoned in Habarana:
Jantha Vikmukthi Peramuna (JVP) leader, Anura Kumara Dissanayake speaking at a rally, asked what the rationale was behind protesting the summoning of Shiranthi and Yoshitha Rajapaksa on suspicion of the murder of ruggerite Wasim Thajudeen.
"This jeep was donated by the Red Cross Society to the Disaster Management Ministry. Thereafter the Jeep was gifted to the Siriliya Foundation led by Shiranthi Rajapaksa.
The jeep was found abandoned in Habarana by the CID, after which investigations commenced" he said.
Dissanayake said that the CCTV footage showed a Defender Jeep following the vehicle of Thajudeen.
"Thajudeen stopped to get some water and after he got into the vehilce there is evidence that a Defender Jeep followed him similar to the one that was given to the Siriliya Foundation" he said.
He said that once the jeep was handed over to the Siriliya Foundation by the then Minister Felix Perera, the jeep was taken over by Yoshitha Rajapaksa.
" Yoshitha Rajapaksa was the one who used it.The colour of the jeep had been changed thrice and after the occurrence of the death, the jeep was left abandoned in Habarana" he said. He questioned as to if suspicion would not arise, given the circumstances.
"What is wrong with summoning them to the CID?. If they have an explanation as to why the jeep was left abandoned all they need to do is provide that" he said.

Risk management: Everyone’s business!

01

02logoHome truths

Friday, 18 August 2017

Organisations and their employees takerisks and also managerisksevery day.  Of course, it is a part of the business and the service delivery operations. However, often, the management of risks is confined to the treatment of risk symptoms.

Saturday, August 19, 2017


In a gross distortion of reality, The New York Times claims it is Israel, not Palestinians, who are being “walled in.”Shadi HatemAPA images

Michael F. Brown-18 August 2017

Isabel Kershner, writing in The New York Times, recently misrepresented the reality of Israeli-built walls and the fact that it is Palestinians enclosed by them and not Israelis.

Establishing that she spends far too much time in an Israeli milieu and too little in occupied Palestinian territory, she flips reality by penning, “Challenged by hostile forces on most of its fronts, Israel is already pretty much walled in.”

Yet it is Israel itself which has chosen to build walls. The people to describe as “walled in” are Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Palestinians are the ones being forcibly enclosed within bantustans as part of a comprehensive system of apartheid – not Israelis.

Throughout the article, Kershner repeatedly omits vital information about an underground wall Israel is building to further obstruct Palestinian egress from the tightly blockaded Gaza Strip.

Omissions

Israel has peace agreements with both Egypt and Jordan – and security arrangements with the Palestinian Authority to police its own people under Israeli occupation.

Even on its frontline in the occupied Golan Heights with Syria, where a devastating civil war has killed hundreds of thousands of people, Israel funds Syrian armed opposition groups to maintain a buffer zone controlled by “friendly forces.”

Yet these facts are excluded in Kershner’s decision to present a tough neighborhood spin with Israel “challenged by hostile forces on most of its fronts.”

Most of those fronts – beyond those where the Israeli government has signed peace agreements with other states – are occupied territory held by Israel for over 50 years.

Treating occupied people as “hostile” is akin to the moral equivalency offered by US President Donald Trump in equating anti-fascists and anti-racists with Nazis and white supremacists.

How else are people under an oppressive military occupation that deprives them of their most basic rights, while systematically colonizing their land, supposed to feel about their occupiers?

Yet Kershner dismissively employs the term “hostile forces,” undercutting millions of occupied people calling for equal rights and a return to stolen homes and properties.

Also omitted is a racist quote early last year from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding his determination to build walls all around Israel, though some of this construction would clearly be on occupied Palestinian territory.

Likening Palestinians to animals, Netanyahu stated, “In our neighborhood, we need to protect ourselves from wild beasts.”

Israel’s wall with Egypt, though readers won’t learn it in this article from Kershner, was built in significant partto keep out African migrants and refugees, principally from Eritrea and Sudan, fleeing war and other perils.

Netanyahu himself admitted as much.

President Trump is right. I built a wall along Israel's southern border. It stopped all illegal immigration. Great success. Great idea 🇮🇱🇺🇸

Not noted in Kershner’s article is that last year the US earmarked $120 million over three years for the US and Israeli militaries to develop jointly a system to detect tunnels. The New York 
Times reported on that funding, but in the context of an article about tunnels between Mexico and the US.

Land grab unreported

Kershner claims the “aboveground fences and sections of concrete wall [that] run along and through parts of the West Bank” are “a legacy of Palestinian suicide bombings during the second intifada.”

But she fails to note many observers’ contention that due to the fact 85 percent of the barrier runs inside the occupied West Bank, Israel’s construction of it appears to be far more of a land grab than anything to do with security.

There remain large gaps and other vulnerabilities that tens of thousands of Palestinians use to bypass the unfinished West Bank barrier every year.

This fact undermines Israel’s claim – repeated even by Trump to justify his plan to build a wall along the US-Mexico border – that the barrier is an effective security measure.

The evidence indicates that what stopped the suicide bombs is not the wall, but that Palestinian factions decided to abandon the tactic.

Nor does Kershner mention that the International Court of Justice ruled in 2004 that Israel’s barrier runs “contrary to international law.”

This follows on the heels of a New York Times article in March that The Electronic Intifada reported on.

There, Russell Goldman reported that the windows of a “nine-room guesthouse”
in Bethlehem “overlook the barrier that separates the territory [the West Bank] from Israel.”

In fact, the wall outside the hotel separates occupied West Bank territory from occupied West Bank territory. The New York Times’ unwillingness to correct the article may leave readers with the impression it doesn’t know the relevant geography or that it has ceded at least part of the West Bank to Israel.

Misrepresenting tunnels

Kershner is also vague on how the tunnels were used by Hamas during Israel’s 2014 assault on Gaza.
She writes: “In 2014, after 50 days of fighting, Israel said it had put dozens of Hamas tunnels out of commission, including several extending into Israeli territory, threatening nearby civilian communities. Some had been used to attack soldiers.”

She should be clearer. Were any of these tunnels used to attack civilians? The answer from the UN Human Rights Council’s independent investigation into the 2014 war is no.

The 2015 report stated that “the tunnels were only used to conduct attacks directed at IDF [Israeli army] positions in Israel in the vicinity of the Green Line, which are legitimate military targets.”


Kershner has an obligation to her readers to state this, particularly in the aftermath of carnage which saw only six Israeli civilians killed, but 1,462 Palestinian civilians – including 551 children – lose their lives during Israel’s assault.

Palestinian teenager in West Bank knife attack killed: Israel police


Israeli border guard reportedly stabbed in leg

Israeli border guards (AFP/file photo)

Saturday 19 August 2017
A Palestinian teenager who tried to attack an Israeli border guard in the occupied West Bank with a knife on Saturday was shot dead, an Israeli police spokeswoman said.
She said the 17-year-old attacker approached a group of border guards and pulled a knife from his bag to attack one of them, and another guard opened fire on him.
The Palestinian health ministry identified the teenager as Qoteiba Yussef Zahran from the Tulkarm region in the northern West Bank.
The Israeli spokeswoman said one of the border guards suffered a slight leg injury during the incident, but did not say clearly if he had been stabbed by the Palestinian.
Israel's public radio said the guard was the victim of "friendly fire".
The Jerusalem Post reported, however, that a border policeman was lightly wounded after being stabbed near the Tapuach junction in the northern West Bank.
The 21 year-old victim who was stabbed in the leg was treated by Magen David Adom paramedics and IDF medical forces at the scene, the Post said.  He was evacuated to Beilinson Hospital in Petach Tikva and reported to be fully conscious.
A wave of unrest that broke out in October 2015 has killed more than 294 Palestinians or Arab Israelis, 47 Israelis, two Americans, two Jordanians, an Eritrean, a Sudanese and a Briton, according to an AFP toll.
Israeli authorities say most of the Palestinians killed were carrying out knife, gun or car-ramming attacks.
Others were shot dead in protests and clashes, while some were killed in Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip.
The violence had greatly subsided in recent months, but tension around the highly sensitive Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem saw a spike in July.