Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Shiranthi suddenly contracts amnesia within CID ! - Nefarious decade idlers and saboteurs stage pavement drama (video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 16.Aug.2017, 11.45PM)  Can you beat that? Shiranthi Wickremesinghe Rajapakse the wife of Percy Mahendra Rajapakse (who poses and   parades as the greatest savior ever  of the Sinhala Buddhists  and as the one and only who champions their cause ) told the CID yesterday (15)  that she does not know to  read Sinhala !
Shiranthi made this shocking revelation when she was summoned to the CID headquarters on the 15 th to record her statement as a suspect in connection with the abduction and brutal murder of popular Rugby player Wasim Thajudeen which was camouflaged to look  a vehicle accident. Investigations had revealed  It was the defender vehicle belonging  to Shiranthi which  was used at that time by the criminals. 
After recording her statement for several hours , when she was told to sign the document  , Shiranthi the wife of Medamulana Rajapakse , the self proclaimed  hero who  parades (rather masquerades) as the savior of Sinhala Buddhists told the CID she needed her lawyer’s assistance to read  because she does not know Sinhala. 
At the beginning of investigations , when Mahinda Rajapakse inquired  whether he or her lawyers can be close by , the CID refused to grant that concession ( CID does not permit any outsider  to be close by when interrogating a suspect) . In any case , after Shiranthi said she cannot read Sinhalese ,the CID  allowed her lawyer Jayantha Weerasinghe (lawyer for Rajapakses) who was outside to come in and assist her while also warning  the lawyer that he should not make any changes to the recorded statement.
It is noteworthy   Shiranthi gave the answers in Sinhalese to the questions asked in the same language though she said she cannot read Sinhala.. As her statements and the questions asked by the CID, and nothing else have been tape recorded, neither she nor her lawyer  can be permitted to make any changes, the CID told them . Finally her lawyer after reading the statement instructed her to sign same. 
Shiranthi born in Badulla attended  a Sinhala  Montessori in Badulla . After coming to  Colombo she  studied at  the Holy Family convent , Colombo and followed her  classes in both Sinhalese and English languages . Though how  Shiranthi suddenly and mysteriously developed amnesia (the mental sickness of forgetfulness) while within the CID (forgetting the Sinhalese language) is yet  unknown , her suddenly getting cured of it and signing her statement is now well known.

The joint opposition and its  goons, goofs ,slaves, idlers and saboteurs that  always interpret everything wrong and as a political ‘project’ viewed  the summoning of Shiranthi Rajapakse to the CID over her criminal involvements as an opportunity to score political plus points .They came in  bus loads to stage a pavement drama in front of the CID thereby reviving the past memories of violence of their own nefarious corrupt decade during which period people were attacked ruthlessly  and brutally  unlike now.  The cheap pavement drama of the Joint opposition idlers and hooligans captured by the TV cameras is hereunder 
---------------------------
by     (2017-08-16 23:43:27)

Sri Lanka: The exploitation of minerals

The US is critical of China’s role however, if the US establishes itself, it could be as bad or significantly far worse; a very clear picture of their patronising role in the Middle East is something Sri Lanka should view with concern as the US gets ready to establish a second base in the Indian Ocean. To quote Henry Kissinger, “America has no friends, only interests”

by Ashley de Vos-
( August 16, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) If there is an asset, should it be exploited to the fullest in the shortest period of time? The traditional view would be based on very careful and controlled use. Today, in the global market place an asset is viewed very differently. As most investors in a business are interested in an ever increasing the bottom line question of eventual sustainability raises questions that need answers. Unfortunately, all exploitation has limits and if profit is the only criteria, whatever the pontification, it cannot and is not sustainable in the long term. It will always be a short term solution, to what could be a long term disaster.
The recent news line of the great interest shown by a very prominent Chinese mining company into mineral exploitation in Sri Lanka is disturbing and requires careful review. The Chinese are well experienced in exploitation of minerals. They have already bought up a number of mining rights in northern and north-western Australia. The extraction method would entail open strip mining and the removal and export of the material in the shortest period of time, without any value addition benefit for Australia.
They are doing the same in Afghanistan. A very important and hitherto unknown large Buddhist Silk Route site ‘Mes Aynak’, discovered during the initial exploration for a copper mine,was given until December 2016 for an immediate rescue excavation, a daunting task indeed. No one is sure what happened in the end. The purchasing of mineral rights across the continent of Africa would also be on similar lines. ‘According to World Trade Asia, over 80 percent of China’s imports from Africa are in mineral products’.
‘China’s commitment to FDI and infrastructure investment in Africa, regardless of it being for the implicit purpose of enabling easier exportation of oil, is aiding African development in the process. Chinese workers and companies alike are involved in building roads and railways and other such infrastructure development projects.’ The Tan-zam railway completed in the 1970s to connect the copper mines in Zambia to the Tanzanian Indian Ocean port of Dar-es-salaam, is an engineering marvel as it travels through totally unchartered territory, with over 5,000 Chinese being sacrificed to lions during the duration of the project construction. Interestingly, ‘today the west seems to be concerned about a closed imperialistic loop, which, as experts on imperialism, could be a sentiment borne of their own colonial experiences with Africa that they see China now closely imitating’.
Peter Navarro, a business professor at the University of California-Irvine described the US understanding of this loop as, “China goes in, builds the infrastructure, and uses that country’s infrastructure to extract their resources, takes those resources back to China, builds finished goods, and then ships them back into that country to sell. The bottom line is poverty instead of prosperity in countries that have incredible natural wealth”. Serge Mombouli, onetime Congolese Ambassador to the United States stated, “The Chinese are business people. They are not a charity organization. They are coming for business and any contract that the Chinese sign with African country, those are contracts that are negotiated.”The Chinese mining enterprise has reached South America as well.
‘There is truth to Navarro’s claims, Angola accounts for 50 percent of China’s oil imports and China has invested USD 2 billion in infrastructure development, yet still 70 percent of Angolans live under the poverty line. The same can be said for Sudan and in Nigeria 80 percent of the country’s revenues come from China’s oil importations, but the money is not trickling down. China’s reliance on African oil, in particular the case of Sudan, has highlighted political scrutiny from western countries, particularly the US’, perhaps based on jealousy. ‘If China wants to remain long term trade partners with its largest oil exporters it may need to consider the social and humanitarian ramifications of its trade policy and revise how it could contribute more to establishing more stable future bilateral relations’.
The US is critical of China’s role however, if the US establishes itself, it could be as bad or significantly far worse; a very clear picture of their patronising role in the Middle East is something Sri Lanka should view with concern as the US gets ready to establish a second base in the Indian Ocean. To quote Henry Kissinger, “America has no friends, only interests”
Sri Lanka has many special heavy minerals, including Thorium. Two decades ago there was an Australian with permission from the government exporting sealed barrels of a sand material. No one was allowed to access the site by the special armed guard protecting the site, however, due to the protests it was stopped. The government of Sri Lanka should not issue mineral mining permits without a proper and careful evaluation of what is there, its extent and what could be permitted to be taken out. This is often done without even understanding or appreciating the possible damage to the valuable and precious resource and eventually to the environment?
Layers of Garnet sand accumulated over thousands of years in the sand dunes, along the south coast has been sold or negotiated for sale to a company, they state that they will extract the layer of garnet sand and reconstitute the sand dune. A dune that has taken thousands of years to form cannot be reconstituted by human hands. Ilmenite along the north east coast was a resource that had been sold in the late 1960s to a Japanese company at Rs. 25.00 a ton. Mr Hara the Engineer in charge announced at that time that the company was making a profit of $ 4 Million per year, while the Geological & Mines Bureau was making a loss. The project was subsequently given to the Provincial Council which gave it to an Indian Company for exploitation. The Indians built the Pulmudai Hospital for the people, but more for use by their staff. Rutile the base for Thorium, was sold for Rs. 606.00 per ton. In many countries as these are metals of the future they are stockpiled, instead of selling their precious resources, on the understanding that the real value will rise to astronomical heights in the future. Desperate Sri Lanka has no such plan.
There are special gem stones being washed off the different peniplanes, with even the possibility of diamonds being found in the south as a by-product of Sri Lanka’s original connection with Gondwana land and the shifting continents. Thankfully, some years back, an attempt by a powerful group together with foreign collaboration, to promote a proposal to mechanically dredge the rivers for gem stones, was stopped before they got too far. This dredging would have destroyed all the endemic lifeforms inhabiting special pockets along the streams and rivers and would have added to the destruction and erosion already perpetrated by the many mini hydro projects operational and or proposed along most mountain streams in the hill country.
The question that may be asked is what happens when all these resources are extracted out of the ground to be enjoyed by someone else? Is this not exploitation to benefit a select few in the short term? What happens to the human populations in these countries, after they have been raped of their resources and what happens to the deep open pits left behind? Maybe “Open Pit Tourism? The way to go. For example, the Congo a large country with unbelievable riches, raped for decades by the colonial rulers and corrupt leaders, is today one of the poorest countries in Africa. Wake up Sri Lanka!
Some years ago, Sri Lanka experienced an early attempt by a foreign company with Japanese/American and local political backing, in its attempt to exploit the whole of the Eppawela rock phosphate deposit within a very short period of 30 years. The 10 mile buffer zone round the deposit insisted on by the company as an insurance against the deposit extending far beyond what is known today, stretched up to the sacred city of Anuradhapura and the Sri Maha Bodhi and even ignored the many historic remains existing in between. The exploited material was to be taken by special train to Trincomalee to a processing plant where the sulphuric acid tanks were located and the excess residue from the process, the mountains of phosphor gypsumwas to be collected in Cod bay with a new sea dam, constructed across its short mouth closing it off from the Ocean. Over time the leeching of this phosphor gypsum into the sea, could affect the future of all marine life in the deep channel going north east out of Trincomalee.
‘Phosphor gypsum is a carcinogenic substance and getting rid of it is difficult. Gypsum stacks represent a serious environmental threat to Central Florida and other American cities. According to the EPA, 32 million tons of new gypsum waste is created each year by the phosphate industry in Central Florida alone.’
As noted by the popularTampa Tribune, “The gypsum mound is near capacity, and a wet spring or a tropical storm could cause a catastrophic spill” To prevent such a spill, which was all but inevitable, the US – EPA recently agreed to let Florida pursue “Option Z”: To load 500-600 million gallons of the waste water onto barges and dump it directly into the Gulf of Mexico.The dumping of the waste water into the Gulf represents the latest in a series of high-profile embarrassments for Florida’s phosphate industry; one of the most dramatic of which happened on June 15, 1994.As noted by the St. Petersburg Times, “Spills from these stacks have periodically poisoned the Tampa Bay environs.” One spill, in 1997, from a now-defunct gypsum stack in Florida, “killed more than a million fish.”
‘Resting atop the phosphate industry’s gypsum piles are highly-acidic wastewater ponds, littered with toxic contaminants, including fluoride, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and the various decay-products of uranium? This combination of acidity and toxins makes for a poisonous, high-volume, cocktail, which, when leaked into the environment, wreaks havoc to waterways and fish populations. Due to big company pressure these cities have not been able to evacuate these mountains of the Phosphor gypsum’.
Only a few Sri Lankans realise that the ancients did make use of the fertilizer at Eppawela, but in a more subtle and sustainable manner. They did not dig it out of the ground, instead they used the monsoon rains to wash over it. The Ela has no bund on the side of the deposit but only on the side opposite to the deposit. Rain water run off over the deposit carried a very small, but sufficient amount into the Ela. This is then taken along with the water in the canal to the fields of Anuradhapura. This intelligent use ensured that the deposit was in use for over two thousand years and still available for another couple of thousand years, if not misused. This is ancient philosophy and knowledge at its sustainable best.
The cry raised by the Farmers and the Temple priest in Eppawela, with the support of the prime mover the well-known photographer, the late Nihal Fernando and other committed environmentalists sounded a very loud ‘Apita Epa Wala’ against the exploitation. The sale of this depositand the proposed open mining programme of the foreign group, finally ended in court. The brilliant judgement at the conclusion of the court proceedings by the very eminent judge Ranjit Amarasinghe, was a milestone in judicial history. This judgement should be read by all, including the political entities. All students of law interested in environmental issues should study the case. We have to educate yourselves on why these valuable resources should be preserved and not lost to a greed-driven herd?
Is the present excavation of the phosphate rock that is taking place at Eppawela, though small in relation to what was to have been done, helping to create thedeadly cocktail? Now being transported along the Ela carrying water to the fields in the NCP and likely responsible for the new diseases experienced by the poor farmer? We will never know.

Talks with India for Mattala JV to take off this week

  • Negotiations to focus on equity ratio, with SL offering India 49% share
  • Indian proposal suggests 70:30 share, investing $ 205 million
  • Govt. to carry out feasibility study and reassessment of property before final decision

image_1489638144-82b5c38223

logoBy Chathuri Dissanayake -Thursday, 17 August 2017

Negotiations on an Indian proposal for a Joint Venture to turn around the loss-making Mattala Airport will take off tomorrow with plans by the Transport Ministry to renegotiate the terms offered in the initial proposal.

The ministry will commence negotiations on a ratio for the sharing of equity, starting at 49:51, for India and Sri Lanka respectively to counter the Indian proposal of 70:30, Daily FT learns. Further, the ministry will also request a more detailed proposal for the JV.

The Cabinet last week gave the Transport and Civil Aviation Ministry the green light to appoint a suitable Cabinet-Appointed Negotiation Committee (CANC) to evaluate a proposal by the Government of India to enter into a JV to develop the Mattala Airport.

“We have to first prepare an employer’s request and outline what function can be included under the JV and what should be retained by the ministry. We have to outline all the infrastructure available and functions like air traffic control and the functions of civil aviation regulations cannot be given to a JV. Only the commercial activities can be given,” said Transport Ministry Secretary Nihal Somaweera.

The Indian Government’s proposal for investment, which was given to the Ministry in May to form a JV company with the Sri Lankan Government, proposed a ratio of 70:30 for 40 years.

“This will have to be renegotiated depending on the investment amount they are willing to bring in to the venture. The time period will also have to be renegotiated,” Somaweera said.

Steps are already underway to obtain fresh evaluation from the Government valuer for the leased land and other assets of MRIA. The negotiation for equity share will also be based on the valuation report, Somaweera said.

“We have to first take into consideration the developed value of the airport and the infrastructure available. Further, we have to see how much of an investment the Indian party is willing to bring in before agreeing on the ratio.”

The initial proposal given by Indian Government has expressed interest to Operate, Manage, Maintain and Develop MRIA and is not limited to commercial aviation. The proposal also shows interest in developing aircraft maintenance repair and overhaul, and maintaining a flying school. According to the proposal, the Indian Government is ready to invest $ 205 million as their equity share while expecting their Sri Lankan counterpart to share the balance $ 88 million, totalling $ 293 million as per their assessment value of the net worth of MRlA.

However, the Cabinet proposal submitted by the ministry highlighted that the proposal was at an initial stage, and that it should be further evaluated based upon the re-evaluation of the assets and lease value of land.

Further, it was also proposed to obtain a feasibility study with special attention on the conditions necessary to be included for the JV with India.

The Ministry called for ‘Expression of Interest’ (EOI) for aviation-related ventures at MRIA following Cabinet approval in December 2016 to call for investors due to the continuous operational loss currently incurred by the venture and received eight proposals mainly from local investors, but none covered the entire operation, management and maintenance of MRIA. However, these proposals too are presently being evaluated for the selection of an investor.

“Those proposals were not successful, they were all for small operations focusing on single activity pilot training which will not generate enough revenue,” Somaweera said.

According to the ministry, the accumulated loss born by Airport and Aviation Services Sri Lanka (AASL) as at 31 December 2016 was $ 15.6 billion. The average operational cost, including loan interest, without exchange loss per year is $ 20 million. The total investment of the troubled airport is $ 252 million inclusive of a $ 39.6 million price escalation claimed by the contractor and another $ 4 million invested by AASL. 
Video: Israeli forces bring terror to Jerusalem hospital

Ali Abunimah-15 August 2017

This video shows Israeli occupation forces bringing terror and violence inside East Jerusalem’s Al-Makassed hospital.
At one point, Israeli occupation forces tried to seize a critically wounded man who was being taken to surgery.
The video shows medics and civilians attempting to protect the man, Muhammad Abu Ghanam, from being seized. But the 20-year-old died about 20 minutes after the commotion.
The video was published Sunday by the human rights group B’Tselem, along with a harrowing report on the 21 July Israeli raid.
The assault was part of Israel’s violent reaction to the campaign of civil disobedience and protests by Jerusalemites last month against Israeli moves to tighten control over the al-Aqsa mosque compound.
Abu Ghanam was one of the six Palestinians killed by Israeli forces during protests related to al-Aqsa.

Maternity ward raided

“Words fail to convey the gravity of the police’s conduct inside the hospital,” B’Tselem said.
“The fright engendered by scores of armed police raiding a hospital cannot be downplayed. When these feelings of terror are accompanied by an assault on medical staff and interference with medical care, the situation escalates to one of a real risk to the lives of the many patients in the hospital.”
B’Tselem’s report includes testimonies from medical staff describing dozens of heavily armed Israeli personnel raiding the hospital. They forced their way in, attacking security guards and civilians, who tried to defend the facility, with stun grenades and sponge-tipped bullets.
The Israelis kicked people out of the blood bank where dozens of volunteers were trying to donate desperately needed blood. They raided the maternity ward, including a room where a mother was present, and sprayed pepper spray into another that was empty. Staff gathered most of the mothers in one room and took their babies to the nursery to protect them.

Israeli forces blocked ambulance

Abu Ghanam had been involved in confrontations between Jerusalem youths and occupation forces in the al-Tur neighborhood when he was shot in the chest.
Israeli forces stood around him for five to 10 minutes without providing any medical assistance, according to B’Tselem. Then when a Red Crescent ambulance arrived, Israeli forces tried to obstruct it. But the paramedics were able to reach Abu Ghanam and get him into the ambulance – which one of the Israeli soldiers tried to get into as well.
“There was some mutual shoving between one of my colleagues and the two officers for about a minute, and then we got into the ambulance,” one of the medics told B’Tselem. “I locked the ambulance with the central locking system.”
The medics then managed to drive to the hospital, despite Israeli forces trying to block their way.
But for all the efforts of the medical staff, they could not save Abu Ghanam’s life. After he died, Palestinians managed to smuggle him out of the hospitall and take him for immediate burial, to avoid Israeli forces confiscating his body – a frequent form of collective punishment.

“Cheap” lives

report last month by Amnesty International called the Israeli assault on the hospital a “ruthless display of force.”
“The conduct of Israeli forces who carried out violent raids on Al-Makassed hospital harassing and intimidating staff and patients is utterly deplorable,” Amnesty’s deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa, said. “There can be no justification for preventing medical workers from caring for a critically wounded patient.”
The 21 July assault on Al-Makassed hospital, B’Tselem said, “is part of a much larger picture, one in which Israeli authorities repeatedly show the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian residents of Jerusalem just how unwanted they are in their own city and how cheap their lives are.”

EXCLUSIVE: UAE sought Gaza war assessment from 'father' of Israel's Iron Dome system


Leaked emails show Yousef Otaiba contacted Uzi Rubin via top pro-Israel analyst, in latest evidence of growing ties between UAE and Israel
Meetings were suggested shortly after Israel's eight-day war with Hamas in 2012 (AFP)
Clayton Swisher-Thursday 17 August 2017
The UAE's top diplomat in America sought a battle damage assessment of Israel's 2012 eight-day war on Gaza from the "father" of Israel's Iron Dome missile defence system, according to leaked emails obtained by Middle East Eye.

Cracking down on 'black' money, India steps up scrutiny of shell firms

Shops and houses are pictured inside the Mercantile office building at 9/12, Lalbazar Street, in Kolkata, India, August 14, 2017.


NEW DELHI/KOLKATA (Reuters) - When India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi banned high-denomination currency bills in a surprise move late last year, authorities noticed a surge in shell companies depositing cash in banks, seemingly in a bid to hide who owned that wealth.

The moment, said a top aide to Modi, was an eye-opener for the government, which had not realized just how much shell companies were being used to hide assets and launder money.

Modi's office has formed a team of top law enforcement and revenue officials to go after such companies, according to the aide and a government memo reviewed by Reuters.

Last month, the authorities ordered nearly 200,000 shell companies to be shut down, and the aide said the government is examining hundreds of thousands more.

The systematic crackdown on shell companies - which have no active business operations or assets - is perhaps one of the most tangible outcomes of demonetization, which aimed to hit tax evasion and move India toward cashless, digital transactions that leave a paper trail.

"We are very much at war against black money. The impact of this (crackdown) will be huge on shell companies," the aide, who cannot be named in line with government rules, told Reuters.

In his Independence Day address on Tuesday, Modi claimed credit for going after these companies, and warned that "looters of the nation's wealth will have to answer."

Modi took office in 2014, vowing to fight corruption and bring back billions of dollars stashed away overseas as well as in real estate, stock markets and front companies through a web of fictitious names.

While the move to withdraw 85 percent of bank notes shook the economy and was widely criticized, the fight against unaccounted wealth carries overwhelming support from ordinary Indians who often have to pay bribes for government services.

LALBAZAR STREET, KOLKATA

A high-level task force leading the investigation has found hundreds of shell companies are registered in a few buildings in the eastern city of Kolkata, according to the government note reviewed by Reuters.

More than 400 companies listed their address in a dimly-lit colonial-era building at 9/12 Lalbazar Street.

In its warren of offices were firms offering services such as earthmoving equipment, infrastructure financing, information technology consultants and many others which had office space the size of cubicles.

Many were locked, with their padlocks coated in dust. Others were grimy residential quarters with laundry hanging from the windows.
A man goes down the stairs inside the Mercantile office building at 9/12, Lalbazar Street, in Kolkata, India August 14, 2017.

Data separately provided by Tofler, a company information database service, identified nearly 3,000 companies in two offices in the building. Some were named after flowers.

A tax inspector said the Kolkata firms were a virtual money laundering industry and drew a parallel to the Panama legal firm Mossack Fonseca that emerged from obscurity last year after the leak of millions of documents from its offices that illustrated how the wealthy use offshore corporations to avoid taxes.

"The Kolkata industry does the work of obfuscating money trails. Kolkata companies are a huge network that take your money from one end and bring it out the other," said the inspector, who didn't want to be identified as he's not authorized to talk to the media.

FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT

The shell companies support much of the fraud and embezzlement in India, tax authorities say.
The owners of these companies create elaborate smokescreens, including naming personal servants and chauffeurs as board directors, the tax inspector said, adding they are used to obscure the ultimate beneficiaries, conceal political investment, route money to evade tax, commit fraud or manipulate tenders.

Last week, the Securities Exchange Board of India imposed trading restrictions on 162 listed entities as shell companies as part of its broader crackdown on illegal offshore transfers and tax evasion.

Several firms identified in the list of front companies have challenged the decision, saying they were engaged in legitimate business.

The Serious Fraud Investigation Office is creating a database of shell companies, and has so far identified 114,269 as front firms.
The database contains details of those involved in the shell company 'eco-system', from those who set up the companies to the beneficiaries of laundered money and the professional mediators who bring the operators and beneficiaries together, the government note said.

More than 370 front companies were listed at 23A Netaji Subhash Road, another site in Kolkata, according to the note.

Sujit Kumar Mukherjee, the secretary of the 23A Tenants’ Association, said he was not in a position to say if there were front firms operating from the building.

"It is very difficult to say who is doing what behind the front door," he said.
($1 = 64.2350 Indian rupees)


Additional reporting by Subrata Nagchoudhury in KOLKATA; Editing by Ian Geoghegan; Editing by Ian Geoghegan
Confidential U.N. Report Accuses Saudi Coalition of Killing Hundreds of Yemeni Kids 

Top U.N. advisor to recommend coalition should be put on the black list of countries that kill and maim children in war.
Confidential U.N. Report Accuses Saudi Coalition of Killing Hundreds of Yemeni Kids

No automatic alt text available.
BY COLUM LYNCH-AUGUST 16, 2017

A Saudi-led military coalition conducting airstrikes in Yemen committed “grave violations” of human rights against children last year, killing 502, injuring 838, according to a draft report by the U.N. Secretary General António Guterres.

“The killing and maiming of children remained the most prevalent violation” of children’s rights in Yemen, according to the 41-page draft report obtained by Foreign Policy. “In the reporting period, attacks carried out by air were the cause of over half of all child casualties, with at least 349 children killed and 333 children injured.”

Saudi Arabia and its allies have been trying since March 2015, with U.S. backing, to force Houthi rebels out of power in Yemen. But the coalition’s air strikes have been heavily criticized for killing civilians, hobbling infrastructure, and destroying the country’s architectural heritage.

The chief author of the confidential draft report, Virginia Gamba, the U.N. chief’s special representative for children abused in war time, informed top U.N. officials Monday, that she intends to recommend the Saudi-led coalition be added to a list a countries and entities that kill and maim children, according to a well-placed source. The decision will have to be taken by Guterres, who will make the final report public later this month.

The Saudi-led air coalition was responsible for inflicting the largest  number of child casualties, 683, with Houthi rebels killing or injuring 414. In contrast, the Islamic State was responsible for six child casualties and Al Qaeda one.

Coalition aircraft also destroyed 28 schools.

The Saudi-led coalition is the only force in Yemen with warplanes and helicopter gunships, making it the likely perpetrator of such acts.

The findings were included in a draft copy of the U.N.’s annual report of Children and Armed Conflict, which documented human rights violations of at least 15,500 children last year by government forces, terrorists and armed opposition groups in more than a dozen conflicts around the world. Four thousand documented abuses of children were attributed to governments, with the vast majority of remaining atrocities, 11,500, committed by terrorist organizations or insurgents.

Saudi officials have privately urged the U.N. to engage in further high level discussions before publishing the report. And they have enlisted the support of the United States, which has urged the U.N. not to list the Saudi-led coalition, saying it’s unfair to implicate all coalition members, even those who have not engaged in atrocities, according to two well-placed sources.In addition to Saudi Arabia, the coalition includes Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates.

Instead, Washington has pressed the UN to list only those  individual states directly responsible for atrocities, according to those sources. But identifying specific states is complicated by the fact that the coalition does not release information on which coalition members are engaged in specific operations, according to officials.

An official at the U.S. mission to the U.N. challenged that account, saying “we have not pursued such an argument [with] anyone at the U.N.”

The publication of the report, which is expected to be issued later this month, presents Guterres with a tough dilemma: if he shames the Saudi coalition he runs the risk of provoking a break with the U.N.’s most influential Arab governments. But if he doesn’t act, he is likely to face charges of undermining the U.N.’s commitment to human rights.

In February, Guterres sought a middle way, suggesting to his top advisors that the U.N. delay the report’s release by three to six months to allow the coalition incentive to improve its conduct. But the office of the U.N. advocate for children feared a delay would subject them to criticism. Guterres, who is expected to receive the final report later this week, has not indicated what he will do.

The current standoff has its roots in the 2001 adoption of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1379, which mandated a senior U.N. official to produce a report each year documenting attacks against children in armed conflicts, including an annex that serves as a blacklist of governments, terrorists and armed groups that kill and maim kids. But it has proven highly controversial among states, who resent being publicly singled out and placed on a list that includes some of the world’s most notorious terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and the Islamic State.

The latest draft report reflects a drop in the overall number of documented casualties in Yemen. Gamba’s draft attributed the fall to a temporary ebb in fighting that followed the signing of a cessation of hostilities agreement in April 2016. But she also suggested the actual casualty count could be higher, noting that “the documentation of violations against children was constrained by access restrictions and insecurity.”

Gamba told FP that the contents of the final report, which is still being discussed with various U.N. offices, have “not been finalized,” and that for the time being there is no final decision on which countries would be included in the blacklist. She also said she was unaware of attempts by the United States to oppose the listing of the Saudi-led coalition. “None of what you indicate has reached me,” she said. And she would not confirm whether she had recommended the Saudi coalition be included on the list or nor.

Stephane Dujarric, the U.N. chief’s top spokesman, declined to comment on Gamba’s finding but he noted that the draft report obtained by FP “is not the final report.”

Last year, Saudi Arabia was included on the list on the grounds that the Saudi-led coalition was responsible for more than half of the 1,953 child casualties in the Yemen conflict.

In response, Saudi Arabia threatened to stage a walk-out by Arab countries from the U.N. and slash hundreds of millions in aid to the international body’s anti-poverty programs unless the coalition was removed from a U.N. rogues list. Then U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon reluctantly agreed to temporarily delist the coalition, citing concerns that the loss of Persian Gulf money could imperil the lives of millions of needy children from South Sudan to Yemen.

But he insisted that the coalition would be put back on the list unless a joint U.N.-Saudi review of the coalition’s conduct demonstrated the allegations were unjustified or that attacks on children stopped. But the Saudis were never put back on the list, and the attacks never stopped.

About 600 children were killed and 1,150 injured in Yemen between March 2016 and March 2017, according to UNICEF.

The Saudi mission to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment. But Saudi officials have privately contended in talks with the U.N. that they have taken steps to avoid child casualties, and that the documented number of deaths and injuries has fallen significantly since last year.

Outside groups say the drop is due less to the coalition’s restraint than to the fact that outside observers, including researchers from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, have been prohibited from entering Yemen on U.N. relief planes. In July, the Saudi-led coalition barred the U.N. from delivering aid to the Houthi-controlled capital of Sanaa because three BBC reporters were traveling on the relief plan.

“Despite all the promises to show restraint that the Saudis have made to the U.N., the U.S. and the U.K., there haven’t really been any improvements in the lives of Yemeni children to brag about,” said Akshaya Kumar, the deputy U.N. representative for Human Rights Watch. “Schools are still being attacked, bombs are still being dropped, and children are still being killed.”

Photo credit: FAYEZ NURELDINE/AFP/Getty Images

Statement from George HW and W Bush doesn’t mention president by name but marks latest Republican rebuke of his defense of far-right rally in Charlottesville
The Bushes said in their statement: ‘America must always reject racial bigotry, antisemitism and hatred in all its forms.’ Photograph: Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images

 in Washington and  in New York-Wednesday 16 August 2017

Former US presidents George HW Bush and George W Bush on Wednesday issued a joint statement that condemned “racial bigotry, antisemitism and hatred” as Donald Trump faced a growing 
backlash over his defence of those who took part in the far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

The father and son did not mention Trump by name, but their rare combined intervention came after Trump’s comments that “there is blame on both sides” for the deadly violence on Saturday.

“America must always reject racial bigotry, antisemitism and hatred in all its forms,” the Bushes said in a statement, going on to cite the one of the nation’s founding fathers, the third president Thomas Jefferson, who lived near Charlottesville.

“As we pray for Charlottesville, we are reminded of the fundamental truths recorded by that city’s most prominent citizen in the Declaration of Independence: we are all created equal and endowed by our creator with unalienable rights. We know these truths to be everlasting because we have seen the decency and greatness of our country.”

Supporters are facing intense pressure to denounce Trump, who at a bellicose press conference on Tuesday drew a moral equivalence between white supremacists and a non-existent group that he branded the “alt-left”.

On Wednesday, Trump was forced to disband two White House business councils disintegrating around him after several resignations from chief executives threatened to cascade. The move was a significant blow to Trump, who ran as a business-friendly president. Unrepentant, he tweeted:

“Rather than putting pressure on the businesspeople of the Manufacturing Council and Strategy and Policy Forum, I am ending both. Thank you all!”

Trump’s remarks came moments after two more business leaders resigned and set him at odds with the Republicans, chief executives and White House advisers who earlier this week had pushed him to more forcefully and specifically condemn the Klan members, neo-Nazis and white supremacists who took to the streets of Charlottesville, ostensibly to protest against the planned removal of a statue of Confederate general Robert E Lee.

The Republican senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina – a frequent Trump critic – issued the strongest rebuke from his party so far. “Mr President, I encourage you to try to bring us together as a nation after this horrific event in Charlottesville,” he said. “Your words are dividing Americans, not healing them.”

Graham highlighted the death of counter-protester Heather Heyer after a white nationalist allegedly drove his car into a group of protesters. Heyer’s mother, father and grandfather spoke on Wednesday at an emotional memorial service for her.

Senator Graham continued: “Through his statements yesterday, President Trump took a step backward by again suggesting there is moral equivalency between the white supremacist neo-Nazis and KKK members who attended the Charlottesville rally and people like Ms Heyer. I, along with many others, do not endorse this moral equivalency.

“Many Republicans do not agree with and will fight back against the idea that the party of Lincoln has a welcome mat out for the David Dukes of the world.”

Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, was among those on the far right who welcomed Trump’s combative Tuesday press conference. The president said there were “some very bad people” among the protesters but added: “You also had people that were very fine people on both sides.”


The most contentious moments from Trump’s latest press conference – video

 Three Trump cabinet members stood by helplessly in the lobby of Trump Tower as the president veered off script and let rip. Chief of staff John Kelly was nearby with head bowed, looking grim.

The Associated Press reported that White House officials were caught off guard because Trump had signed off on a plan to ignore questions from journalists during an event touting infrastructure policies, only to change his mind once he stood behind the lectern.

The fallout has again put the White House on the back foot. An official said Hope Hicks, a close Trump aide, would temporarily serve as White House communications director. Hicks will work with press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on a White House messaging strategy.

Time and again, Trump’s actions and words have led to questions of whether the Republican party can continue to back him. But his remarks on Tuesday – in which he, in effect, became the first president in generations to defend white nationalists – appeared to set a new moral test.

Republican leaders on Capitol Hill shared the approach of the Bushes, condemning Trump without using his name. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell noted that the groups behind the Charlottesville violence were planning a rally in Lexington, in his home state of Kentucky.

McConnell said: “Their messages of hate and bigotry are not welcome in Kentucky and should not be welcome anywhere in America.”

Paul Ryan, the House speaker, declared in a tweet that “white supremacy is repulsive” and there should be “no moral ambiguity”.

But Michael Steele, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee, argued that the statements from the Bushes, McConnell and Ryan did not go far enough.

“That’s the problem: everyone is saying we’ve got to call out the thing,” he told the Guardian.

“You’ve got to name the thing. I support these statements of condemnation but they need to take the line of Senator Flake, Senator Rubio and others in saying, ‘No, Mr President, this is not appropriate’.

“Generic statements about racism are fine, but the president of the United States, the titular head of the Republican party, has aligned himself with racists and antisemites and the like. I don’t know how else to interpret it.”

Steele, who is African American, added: “This cuts to the bone of America. We have a torrid history, a difficult history, an unsettled history with race. The wound has scabbed over and he is apparently trying to rip the scab off.”

Five of America’s most senior military officials took the unusual step of condemning racism and extremism. General Mark Milley, the chief of staff of the US army, and General Robert Neller, the commandant of the US marine corps, were among those to reject extreme rightwing beliefs.

“The army doesn’t tolerate racism, extremism, or hatred in our ranks. It’s against our values and everything we’ve stood for since 1775,” Milley tweeted on Wednesday.

Republicans, cut the outrage. It’s time to disown Trump.

President Trump on Aug. 15 said that “there’s blame on both sides” for the violence that erupted in Charlottesville on Aug. 12. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis and Southern slave owners who decided to kill fellow Americans so that they could keep men, women and children enslaved. The Republican Party, in other words, has obliterated its entire historical legacy and become the party of the Enemies of Lincoln.

And let’s be clear: Republicans cannot say, “That’s not us — that’s just President Trump.” They supported him, they elected him, they defended him and they gave him the aura of a normal presidency. They cannot be the party of Lincoln and be the party of Trump. In that vein, we can dispense with Republicans’ “outrage,” “frustration,” “anger” and all other meaningless expressions of internal sentiment. Unless and until they are prepared to do something — not just send tweets — to politically disown Trump, the party is toast and none of its members should be elected or reelected.

How would they do this? First, elected officials must deny Trump the audience he so desperately craves. They need not appear with him, nor invite him to the Hill. (The State of the Union can be delivered from the White House or in writing; he would besmirch the House by appearing there.) Lawmakers and state officials should not troop to the White House for photo ops. They can communicate with the White House by phone or through aides. In short, Trump must be shunned and ostracized. He is not fit for polite company, let alone the presidency. He has demolished the rules of civilized behavior, and therefore should enjoy none of the ceremonial niceties that are extended to normal presidents.



White nationalist demonstrators are surrounded by counter-demonstrators last weekend at the entrance to Lee Park in Charlottesville. (Steve Helber/Associated Press)

Second, beyond resolutions condemning Trump’s remarks, every member of Congress should do his or her utmost to remove the neo-Nazi iconography in their districts and states. Neo-Nazis have claimed the Confederacy as their own — and therefore have reminded the rest of us that the Confederate statues are not tributes to patriotism, gallantry or liberty but to treason, inhumanity and slavery. That is why neo-Nazis identify with these symbols of the Old South. That is why they have no place in a democratic society built on the principle that “All men are created equal.” State and local officials need to carefully examine school curriculum to make sure students are not confused as to the heroes and the villains in the Civil War. Every student should learn to spot and debunk the “Lost Cause” propaganda. Perhaps April 9 should be a national holiday commemorating the Confederacy’s surrender and the magnanimity displayed by President Abraham Lincoln and U.S. generals toward their defeated foes.

Third, Cabinet members, sub-Cabinet officials, staffers and outside participants on councils, commissions and committees must leave the administration. It’s not enough, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, to look on with a pained expression as the president declares that some of the white nationalists were “very fine” folks. He deceived you and others as to what he would say and he has shown himself unfit. You cannot serve in the administration of a neo-Nazi sympathizer. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, why stay in an administration in which you command so little respect and in which you must lend your own reputation to a disgraceful president? (Defense Secretary Jim Mattis should remain, a final backstop to prevent a military disaster.)

Fourth, Republicans must treat the president as they would someone not of their party — for he is not, to repeat, of the party of Lincoln. If Hillary Clinton refused to release her tax returns, hired unqualified relatives, kept business ventures that posed a conflict of interest and violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause, Republicans would commence hearings and pass legislation to put an end to all of it. It’s long past the time that Trump should be permitted to escape the kind of inquiry Republicans would insist upon for any Democratic president. By refusing to do so, the GOP is saying: “He’s one of ours. He’s a Republican, so we don’t rock the boat.”

Fifth, now would be a fine time for formation of a third party, one that can at the end of the Trump presidency repeal and replace the GOP. The Free Republican Party, the Appomattox Republicans (It cannot be said enough: The Confederates were losers) or whatever ex-Republicans in the center-right call themselves can endorse for office defectors from the GOP and reclaim Republicans who have disassociated themselves with the GOP thanks to Trump. Moderate Republican House members of the Tuesday Group, the new Centrist Project (dedicated to backing independent candidates), members of Stand Up Republic (founded by 2016 conservative independent presidential candidate Evan McMullin and his former running mate, Mindy Finn) and others have the chance to stake their claim as the true successors to the party of Lincoln. Those who have wrestled with the question as to whether the GOP could be reformed or whether it should be discarded in light of Trump’s GOP takeover have their answer. If they cannot disgorge him, they must start over.


In sum, Republicans’ words are insufficient and, at this point, insufferable. When we look back at this time, the only thing people will ask is: “What did you do?” Republicans will need a better answer than “I was outraged and gave tough quotes — on background.”
Slave labour at Ivanka Trump’s clothing factory in Indonesia? Not really

(File) Ivanka Trump blows a kiss to the camera during the launch of her fragrance in New York, in 2013. Source: Shutterstock/lev radin
shutterstock_138004712-940x580  shutterstock_281294669  shutterstock_281294669  shutterstock_138004712-940x580  Time off for staff members who are menstruating is common practice in Indonesia. Source: Shutterstock/Khairul Effendi


By  -4th August 2017

INDONESIA often makes the headlines for all the wrong reasons and not always deservedly so.

The latest case in point is the recent spate of articles denouncing a factory in Subang in West Java called PT Buma which makes clothing for Ivanka Trump’s fashion line. Criticism abounds of “poverty pay”, staff being penalised for menstruating and families who can’t afford to live with their children.

Is it fair to say factory work in Indonesia is tantamount to slave labour? Not really.
To first understand the fate of factory workers in Indonesia, you need to unpick the meaning of the “minimum wage” which, like all parts of Indonesian law, is unnecessarily complex.

Minimum wage in Indonesia comes in two forms. One is upah minimum provinsi (the provincial regional wage) and the other is upah minimum kabupaten (the minimum wage assigned to each regency within a province).

In West Java, the province where Subang is located, the provincial minimum wage is IDR1.4 million (US$105) per month. In Subang, the regency that contains PT Buma, the minimum wage for 2017 is IDR2.3 million (US$173) per month. This means factory workers’ wages in Subang are far higher than the set provincial minimum wage for West Java.
When you look at in context, IDR2.3 million isn’t bad at all. It is not the lowest minimum wage in West Java. Actually, it’s one of the highest.


But PT Buma has been criticised for more than just its pay packets, with one monetary policy in particular drawing scorn. This relates to female employees who are awarded a monthly bonus if they do not take time off work while menstruating.
The policy is both misunderstood and entirely fair.

Time off for staff members who are menstruating is common practice in Indonesia and is known as cuti haid (period holiday). To understand it properly, context is crucial.

What happens if a female employee at PT Buma takes one day off for cuti haid every month and another female employee does not? It means the second female employee will work 12 extra days in the factory per year.

Under the policy at PT Buma, she is (rightly) awarded a bonus for this extra work. Notice the first female employee does not have her pay docked if she calls in sick. She can just take a day off when she is menstruating with no questions asked, a reason for absence that would not be readily entertained in many Western companies. Rather than being a draconian financial penalty, cuti haid is actually refreshingly progressive.

And what if the first female employee wants to work and can’t because she has extremely painful periods, perhaps due to some underlying medical condition? Well, under the factory’s healthcare plan she can go to a doctor and seek treatment.

PT Buma has been made to sound bad, but its minimum wage and paid sick days point to it being one of the better employers in West Java. In an illuminating comment during the interview with the Guardian, one of the workers, Ahmad, appears to admit this is true:
“We don’t like Donald Trump’s policies. But we’re not in a position to make employment decisions based on our principles.”
Basically, if there was a better deal on the table he would take it. There isn’t.

In contrast to those at PT Buma, around 53 percent of workers in Indonesia are self-employed. They don’t have an employer-funded healthcare plan or paid holidays. If they can’t go to work, for whatever reason, then they don’t make any money that day. Factory work, on the other hand, provides a secure base wage and a number of other support systems like three months’ paid maternity leave.

This is not to say factory work is a wholly idyllic employment prospect. By all accounts, it is dull, monotonous and relentless, with staff being pushed to work harder and faster to meet their targets. It is also fair factory staff should be able to ask for more money, even if they are not being awarded “poverty pay”.


But how much more? University graduates in Indonesia usually make a starting salary of around IDR3 million (US$225) a month, so a factory-level job classified as unskilled labour is entirely reasonable by comparison.

PT Buma is not nearly as bad as it sounds, but there is no doubt Indonesian factories can do better. Do these factories have fire safety equipment in place? Do they employ underage workers? Are employees given statutory breaks? Are all health and safety practices being followed?

Change must also come from the unions who need to be better organised and equipped to represent the rights of employees. Workers need to be trained to understand Indonesian labour law. Sanctions must be put in place for factories that prevent workers from joining unions or from demanding better working conditions.

But we should not exaggerate the struggles of minimum wage-earners.

Instead, the government urgently needs to look at improving the conditions of workers in all employment sectors across Indonesia. This needs to be done in line with the minimum wage, the cost of living in Indonesia and the numbers of residents living in poverty, which is now 27.7 million.

That’s right. In 2017, 27.7 million Indonesians live in poverty because they earn under the official poverty line put in place by the Indonesian government which is US$27 per month or 82 cents per day. The global poverty line is US$1.90 per day. A reminder: the workers at PT Buma earn US$172 a month.


And even if that still sounds low, the reality is that minimum wage workers in Indonesia are not being paid “poverty pay”. And those words matter. They matter because it is offensive to pretend minimum wage workers do not receive an adequate salary when 27.7 million Indonesians live in poverty every single day. They are not lucky enough to work in a financially secure job in a factory with a famous client to elicit sympathy.

Change must come. But it will not come by attacking Ivanka Trump, a woman so mired in scandal that allegations of a sweatshop in Indonesia are nothing more than a drop in the ocean of controversy that surrounds her.

If we really want change, we need to stop pitying those who earn a liveable wage and start giving a voice to all those who don’t.

** This is the personal opinion of the writer and does not reflect the views of Asian Correspondent