Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, July 24, 2017

Despite the tremors, UNP and SLFP agree to disagree

  • Both major parties finalising plans for local polls, but different views on when they will be held
  • Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat closed down, but PM’s office sets up PR unit with similar tasks
  • New Ports Minister Samarasinghe works out compromise on Hambantota, signing likely within weeks
By Our Political Editor-Sunday, July 23, 2017
The Sunday Times Sri Lanka
President Maithripala Sirisena hurriedly interrupted the Cabinet meeting that was in progress last Tuesday. He rose from his chair and asked ministers whether they could feel something like a tremor that was causing vibration of the floor.
 
He said he could feel such a phenomenon where he sat — the podium in the onetime Well of the House of Parliament facing ministers seated behind rows of tables. Soon, members of his personal protection group were summoned and told to find out what was happening.
 
The men who left the chamber returned sometime later to tell Sirisena that the vibrations were caused by piling equipment being used in the Chinese funded Colombo Port City project. It was just across the road from the Presidential Secretariat. “Let’s hope that when the construction work finishes, the Presidential Secretariat will be intact,” he remarked half-jokingly. The meeting continued. When discussions or decisions on some 49 items on the agenda were concluded, it was time for “any other business.”
A ceremony to mark the opening of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesingh’s Public Relations Unit at the premises where the Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat earlier functioned. Pic by Priyantha Wickremaarachchi

Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe rose to explain why he has been accused of abusing United Nations envoy Ben Emmerson QC, Special Rapporteur on human rights and counter terrorism. During a five-day visit to Sri Lanka, Emmerson met Rajapakshe at the Justice Ministry. Emmerson is retiring from the UN system later next week.
 
Rajapakshe told the meeting that Emmerson had claimed there were 200 Tiger guerrilla suspects in government custody. This, the minister declared, was a highly exaggerated figure and he had asked Emmerson to explain how he arrived at such a number. The real figure, Rajapakshe said, was sixty. Emmerson had replied that he had obtained those figures from “reliable sources” but had refused to elaborate. The Justice Minister claimed he told Emmerson to rely only on “authenticated” figures. It is in that hostile tempo that the duo had discussed the introduction by the Government of a new counter terrorism law. Here again Rajapakshe was to tell Emmerson that interference was not welcome since the introduction of a new law was the sole prerogative of a sovereign government. He appeared unaware that such foreign intervention was inevitable since the Government had co-sponsored the US backed resolution on Sri Lanka at the Human Rights Council in Geneva. In that too, Sri Lanka had assured that the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) now in force would be repealed.
 
Private tuition in diplomacy

Rajapakshe’s lengthy explanation notwithstanding, he received some private tuition on diplomacy and diplomatic conduct from Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his own ministerial colleagues. “We need to get along with the international community. We don’t want to return to the Mahinda Rajapaksa era,” declared Wickremesinghe. He said in that era, top UN officials were either not allowed to come to Sri Lanka, or were abused when they did arrive.
 
Even if Wickremesinghe did not say so, one such instance was the comment made by then cabinet minister Mervyn Silva. When the UN’s former Human Rights High Commissioner Navi Pillay was in Sri Lanka, he made a public statement that he wished to marry her. In another instance, the then Prime Minister D.M. Jayaratne was to describe a visiting UN dignitary as a “terrorist.”
 
The Premier said that in the recent past, UN reports on Sri Lanka had not been inimical. Only one such report had made some critical references and was bad. Foreign Minister Ravi Karunanayake declared that such undignified remarks against a visiting UN dignitary only made his job difficult. “I am also a patriot but I don’t go about confronting others to demonstrate it,” he said. Endorsing those views were also former Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera and Health Minister Rajitha Senaratne.
 
President Sirisena disclosed that he had received reports that some pro-Tiger guerrilla elements had been responsible for taking Emmerson to a detention centre. That should not happen, he said, and asked who gave permission for this. Prison Reforms Minister D.M. Swaminathan was quick to disown it was he or his Ministry. It turned out that the Foreign Ministry had agreed to the visit in accordance with previously agreed procedures laid out for UN special mandate holders. Such visits, once again, were the result of assurances agreed to by Sri Lanka in the US sponsored Human Rights Council resolution.
 
The ‘tremor’ or vibration that Sirisena encountered when chairing the cabinet session was relatively minor compared to the political tremors he is experiencing. On the one hand, just two weeks after admonishing his partner in governance, the United National Party (UNP) leadership for stalling investigations into high profile cases involving former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and members of his family, Sirisena has placed the state investigative agencies on high gear. A number of cases have now been revived after they had been in limbo for some time. Opposition parties have renewed their campaign against such action, particularly with regard to cases involving military personnel. This week, the UNP also struck a discordant note and delivered what seemed a veiled message to Sirisena.
 
On the other hand, a group of pro-Sirisena loyalists of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) seem hell bent on quitting ranks and sitting as an independent entity in Parliament. The group met twice this week, in the homes of two different SLFP cabinet ministers, to discuss the move. At least a few seem poised on leaving ignoring Sirisena’s appeal to stay together till December 31. 
 
This new deadline is to decide on whether or not to renew a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the SLFP and the UNP to continue the coalition. That new deadline is not lost on the UNP too. It is also busy working out counter strategies.
ACCS closed down, new PR unit set up

This week, the Government’s decision to close down the Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat was officially conveyed to relevant authorities. This Committee served as a ‘clearing house’ of sorts for public complaints on bribery, corruption and fraud and directed them to the relevant state investigative agencies. It functioned under a Cabinet Subcommittee chaired by Premier Wickremesinghe. The decision of the Cabinet has been clearly enumerated. It says:
 
“The major role of the Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat (ACCS) was to forward the complaints received by it from various parties, to the relevant agencies such as the Sri Lanka Police, Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID), Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption etc;
“That, since the FCID is fully functioning at the moment, the need for the functioning of the ACCS does not arise; and

“That, the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption can initiate investigations into an allegation of bribery or corruption, whether of its own or on a complaint made to it, as per provisions in Article 156A(1) (b) of the Constitution;
 
“After discussion, taking into consideration the views expressed by the Members of the Cabinet, it was decided not to extend the term of office of the Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat, the term of which has already expired on 2017–06–30.
“To inform the Secretary to the Prime Minister to take action:

Handover all pending complaints related to documents presently in the possession of the ACCS, to the appropriate Investigative Authorities to pursue action on such complaints;
To assign the officers who have been temporarily released to serve in the ACCS, to their substantive positions in the relevant Institutions;

To terminate the services of the officers/employees, if any, recruited on contract/temporary basis, with immediate effect; and
To transfer the assets of the ACCS, if any, appropriately to the relevant Institutions, for their use.”
Two officials from the Prime Minister’s office took charge of the Secretariat Office along Colombo’s Perahera Mawatha, just outside the northern entrance to ‘Temple Trees’ on Wednesday afternoon. The next day (Thursday), former parliamentarian and diplomat Rosie Senanayake, who is the Deputy Chief of Staff at the Prime Minister’s Office, declared open what was formally called a “Public Relations Unit” in the same building.
J. Dadellage, who is in charge as Consultant of this Unit told the Sunday Times, “This Unit will receive any complaint of public grievances or complaints including cases of bribery or corruption. Thereafter, we will direct it to the relevant agency for investigation or necessary action. The public at times are not aware of the institution they should submit their complaints.”
 
Dadallage added, “In turn we will give the relevant agency a time frame to look into the complaint and submit a report. We can then keep the public informed about the progress concerning the investigation or issue. We will evaluate the progress made regarding the complaints.” Dadallage, a retired state service officer, himself was involved in a controversy before retirement. He once declared that there was nothing wrong in using government funds to purchase and distribute Sil cloth. This is a white cloth worn by Buddhists when they take part in religious observances particularly during Poya Days. Dadallage then equated the gifting of Sil cloth as similar to making Samurdhi payments. However, the former Presidential Secretary (Lalith Weeratunga) has been indicted for using funds from the Telecom Regulatory Commission (TRC) for procuring Sil cloth and distributing it.
 
It was only at the previous Cabinet meeting (July 11) Premier Wickremesinghe urged that the Anti-Corruption Committee Secretariat be brought under his purview. This is by placing it under his Secretary’s charge. However, this was turned down by Sirisena. He explained that the Premier would have to face more allegations if that was done.
 
If Dadallage’s assertions that the new ‘Public Relations Unit’ will play the role of the Secretariat – i.e. receive public complaints and direct them to the relevant state investigative agencies is correct, then it makes a joke of the ministerial decision based on the President’s remarks to shut it down. It is compounded by Dadallage’s remarks that the Unit would give time to those agencies to investigate and monitor such public complaints. Such an arrangement could have continued even with the Anti-Corruption Secretariat in place. Hence, reasons for the closure of the Secretariat have more to it than what has surfaced.

On the face of it, no one can fault Premier Wickremesinghe for setting up a ‘Public Relations Unit’ – one which perhaps could be established even by other Ministers. His office, the PMO, woefully lacks public relations. It cannot even send out a simple press release properly, in any language. There’s no spokesperson for the PM or the PMO.
 
With the setting up of the Unit, it seems its direction is elsewhere. The unit could also seek public complaints and direct them to relevant investigative agencies. However, unlike the Anti-Corruption commeittee Secretariat for which Wickremesinghe obtained prior approval, those PR units do not require the permission of the Cabinet of Ministers. In doing so, Wickremesinghe has delivered to his critics, Sirisena included, that he could have his own mechanisms to fight bribery and corruption. If one institution is denied, there are other institutions that could do the job, seemed the message. Yet, it raises questions of legality on whether a PR Unit can direct state investigative arms to carry out probes and demand periodic status reports.
 
Amaraweera’s remarks

That the UNP ministers have been smarting after Sirisena’s verbal attack over two weeks ago is known. At a previous Cabinet meeting, Enterprise Development Minister Kabir Hashim was to reflect this anger. It began after reported remarks by Minister Mahinda Amaraweera who allegedly told some MPs that certain members of the Rajapaksa family would be arrested soon. Since Amaraweera is known to have the President Sirisena’s ear, his alleged remarks gained currency. When members of the Rajapaksa family raised issue, he reportedly relented and issued a statement that the Rajapaksas should be pardoned if there was any wrong doing. Amaraweera’s colleagues said that he was worried about his eroding support base in his electorate in the Hambantota District. Hashim took the opportunity at the ministerial meeting to ask who was supporting the Rajapaksas now. He said the UNP was being accused of doing so when it only wanted to act in “keeping with the law.”
 
Among the state investigative agencies, the Commission to Investigate Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) which comes under President Sirisena, is to be revamped. An agreement for a grant of Rs 35. 2 million (US$ 250,000) is to be signed by the Government with the US State Department’s Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. A programme to be completed this year includes the funding of training for officers, updating the CIABOC website, acquisition of technical equipment and compilation of code of guideline made by the East West Management Institute (EWMI). The EWMI has been selected by the Department of State to implement the 18 month project. Robert H. Hilton, Deputy Chief of Mission of the US Embassy in Sri Lanka said in a letter to Sarath Jayamanne, Director General of CIABOC, early this year that the project also includes sub-grants to the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) and civil society organisations to raise “public awareness concerning anti-corruption activities.”
 
SriLankan Airlines

Other than these political issues, the Government’s concerns are also focused on the economic front. One such issue is the national carrier SriLankan Airlines. Negotiations are under way with two West Asian carriers for a partnership arrangement. One of them was to complain this week that while a dialogue was under way with it, the national carrier was expanding operations to Melbourne with a weekly flight from Colombo – and blocking the potential partner from the route traffic. They pointed out that such activity prevented it from making a complete study of the operations of SriLankan Airlines since they kept changing.
 
For the Government, pumping colossal amounts of money to keep the airline afloat is not the only commitment. It also has to keep declaring periodically that SriLankan Airlines is “a going concern.” This week, Public Enterprise Development Minister Kabir Hashim made a request for the Government to certify that SriLankan Airlines is a “going concern.” The audit for the year ended March 31, 2017 is now being carrid out for SriLankan by the Auditor General’s Department through KPMG, the well-known global network of professional firms providing audit, tax and advisory services. The External Auditor has asked a letter from the Treasury that the Government of Sri Lanka will extend financial support to SriLankan to maintain its “Going Concern” as a strategic partnership, but it is yet to be worked out. Hashim is seeking Government approval for the Treasury Secretary to issue such a letter. Previous years too, such letters have been issued.
 
In fact, financial backing from the Government, akin to dumping money into a bottomless pit, continues. The Government has already given the green light to a request by SriLankan Airlines to receive a monthly payment of over Rs 1.525 billion for one more year. This is to cover operational costs and will also include payment of salaries among other matters. It was revealed recently, how some of those in the top rungs of the SriLankan management receive handsome pay packets.
 
This week, SriLankan Airlines which has now merged with Mihin Lanka, received another financial boost. It won government approval for Letters of Comfort for “operations” by the national carrier. Mihin Lanka ceased by the end of October 2016 when the operating routes were taken over by SriLankan Airlines. The Letters of Comfort for a specified period of Rs 1.65 billion each from both the Bank of Ceylon and the People’s Bank will now be issued by the Treasury.

In addition, the National Savings Bank, which has been named the “Lead Manager in the re-orientation programme for SriLankan” is receiving Rs 169,303, 748. This is for actions that include “preparation of detailed Request for Proposals, inviting partners, management contracts and preparing comprehensive Information Memorandum. The National Savings Bank Fund Management Company selected reputed consultancy firms to complete the assignment. The consultants were the Attorney General’s Department, KPMG, BNP Paribas, Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy and F.J. and G. de Saram. Despite all these efforts, SriLankan Airlines has still not been successful in finding a partner and thus stem the haemorrhaging of public funds.
 
Hambantota Port project

Another area of economic importance is the Hambantota Port project. Since Ports and Shipping Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe took over, fresh negotiations have been going on with the Chinese firm. Government sources said yesterday that a draft Concession Agreement has almost been knocked into shape and could be ready for sigining within weeks. Samarasinghe is seeking government approval for the Treasury to make repayments of the loan instalments for the project beginning this month. This is particularly in view of the benefits of the Port of Hambantota accruing to the government.
 
He has said that the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) will make the repayment when the Concession Agreement is signed and funds are received from China. He has noted that no allocation of funds for this loan repayment has been made in the revised budget of the SLPA approved by the Board of Directors last month.
 
Funds had been allocated only for future development of Ports other than Hambantota in the revised budget 2017 in the expectation that the burden would be taken over by the Government. Provision that the Treasury would make re-payment of loans is being made in the Concession Agreement.

The construction of the Hambantota Port has been undertaken in two phases. The first phase has been completed and the second is now under way. The port development project including bunkering facility and tank farm has been financed by loans from Exim Bank of China amounting to over US$ 1.3 billion and a loan of over US$$ 20 million from the Bank of Ceylon.
 
The remaining funds were from the income from Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA). Government sources said Minister Samarasinghe has successfully obtained changes in the Concession Agreement from the previous draft (formulated under the previous Minister) to ensure they do not violate any laws including the ones governing the SLPA.
 
Amidst the uneasy calm, both the pro-Sirisena SLFP and the UNP are busy preparing themselves for upcoming, long postponed local polls. If Sirisena has said that such polls will be early next year, Wickremesinghe has declared it would be in November or December. Even on that, there is no unanimity.

The Premier was busy last Monday night hearing power point presentations by foreign electoral strategists on how to win the local polls. He also discussed with his party officials details related to the polls campaign. Amidst some uncertainty, Sirisena has also been talking to his own SLFP ministers. It is becoming clear that both the SLFP and the UNP have agreed to disagree. Though gradually, their plans are unfolding.

13 students arrested at Town Hall protests granted bail

13 students arrested at Town Hall protests granted bail
logoBy Roosindu Peris-July 23, 2017 
The 13 Medical Faculty students arrested by the police this evening during the Sathyagraha at Town Hall, have been granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate Court. 
Thirteen students were arrested for defying a court order issued against the Satyagraha, organized by students attached to the medical faculty at the Town Hall today (23). 
Police had used water cannons to disperse a Satyagraha held by Medical faculty students at Town Hall.
The dispersion action carried out by the police was due to the Medical Students involved in the Satyagraha ignoring a court order that was issued, requesting the Satyagraha to conclude.

Opposition against Basil intensifies – Gota, Chamal go a different way

Opposition against Basil intensifies – Gota, Chamal go a different way

Jul 23, 2017

Other MPs are strongly objecting to Basil Rajapaksa who goes against common decisions of the joint opposition. 

Taking unilateral decisions without consulting other leaders of JO affiliate parties has worsened the situation into a crisis, say reliable sources. Members of those parties had not been invited for certain seminars held recently. Basil’s conduct has had an impact on Roshan Ranasinghe’s withdrawal from the JO and Wimal Weerawansa’s pulling out of the steering committee of the Constitutional Assembly.
 
Gotabhaya Rajakasa has not approved of Basil’s conduct. Chamal Rajapaksa, too, is avoiding events organized by Basil, while Mahinda remains undecided. A group of JO MPs has raised this with Mahinda, who advised them not to get alarmed. Previosuly, Kanchana Wijesekara left the JO after complaining.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Israel refuses to remove metal detectors from mosque despite rising violence

Israelis and Palestinians braced for further confrontations in Jerusalem as death toll rises in wake of new security crackdown
 Palestinians pray in the street outside the flashpoint Lion’s Gate entrance to the Haram al-Sharif-Temple Mount compound that is home to the al-Aqsa mosque,the third holiest in Islam. Photograph: Peter Beaumont for the Guardian

 in Jerusalem-Sunday 23 July 2017 

Israeli officials have said they will not remove metal detectors from outside a Jerusalem mosque, despite their installation triggering rapidly escalating confrontations with Palestinians.

Amid a mounting toll of deaths and injuries in the crisis, Israelis and Palestinians are braced for weeks of confrontation, as both sides appeared to dig in to their positions.

In addition to the metal detectors, Israel has also began installing sophisticated security cameras at one of the entrances to the compound housing the al-Aqsa mosque, known to Muslims as the Haram al-Sharif and revered by Jews as the Temple Mount.

Security officials told Israeli media the cameras were intended to complement the metal detectors, not replace them.

Despite the remarks – and with Israeli generals warning the violence may spiral – other officials appeared to offer a contradictory message, saying the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was considering alternatives to the walk-through sensors placed at entrances to the al-Aqsa mosque compound after two policemen were shot dead there on 14 July.


The mixed signals emerging from the Israeli side have contributed to the sense of confusion driving the crisis, during which Israeli ministers have reportedly overruled warnings from senior security officials about the risk of stoking a widening confrontation with the installation of the devices.

But as Israel’s cabinet met on Sunday with the issue on top of the agenda, Tzachi Hanegbi, the minister for regional development and a senior member of the ruling Likud party, told Army Radio: “They (metal detectors) will remain. The murderers will never tell us how to search the murderers. If they (Palestinians) do not want to enter the mosque, then let them not enter the mosque.”

As other ministers warned of the risk of ‘large scale volatility’, Israel deployed thousands of extra troops to the West Bank.

The UN security council will also hold closed-door talks on Monday about the spiralling violence after Egypt, France and Sweden sought a meeting to “urgently discuss how calls for de-escalation in Jerusalem can be supported”.

In his Sunday sermon in St Peter’s Square in Rome, Pope Francis told worshippers he was following “with trepidation the grave tensions and violence” at the holy site as he appealed for ‘moderation and dialogue’.
In a further indication of the hardening of positions, the Muslim authorities that oversee al-Aqsa said they would continue to oppose any new Israeli-imposed measures.

“We stress our absolute rejection of the electronic gates, and of all measures by the Occupation (Israel) that would change the historical and religious status in Jerusalem and its sacred sites, foremost the blessed Aqsa mosque,” the Palestinian grand mufti, the acting Palestinian chief justice and the Jordanian-sponsored Waqf religious trust said in a joint statement.

The issue exploded into more serious violence on Friday, after days of night-time clashes after the metal detectors, installation, which followed the attack on 14 July that killed two Israeli policemen at the entrance to the site by three Israeli Arabs who Israel says smuggled weapons into the compound.

In clashes that have grown in intensity since mass protests on Friday, four Palestinians have been killed in confrontations with Israeli security forces, while a family of three Israeli settlers was stabbed to death by a Palestinian who entered their home in the West Bank citing the issues around the al-Aqsa mosque as his motive

The sheer scale of the risks involved was made clear on Sunday morning when the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas – who has long threatened to end security cooperation with Israel – cancelled a planned security meeting after announcing he was cutting all contacts.

At the centre of the issue has been two competing impetuses. The first has been the politics of Israel’s right/far-right coalition, led by Netanyahu, which, say critics, led his cabinet to ignore warnings from senior security officials when deciding to install the metal detectors.

The second is centred on the profound Palestinian religious, national and cultural sensitivities around the compound.

And at the centre of the violence has been a deadly miscalculation by the Netanyahu government that bridged both issues in which police recommended the installation of the metal detectors in the immediate aftermath of the 14 July attack.

Persuaded by the idea it would play well with rightwing politicians and voters who had had called for Israel to impose further sovereignty over the site, Netanyahu ignored reported warnings from other security officials, including the Shin Bet domestic intelligence agency, that it could spark bloodshed.
Compounding the error, say critics, Israel also failed to discuss the issue with officials of the waqf – the Jordanian religious institution that administers the compound.

On the Palestinian side the issue is visceral.

Captured by Israel in 1967, the site – regarded by most of the international community as “occupied” although claimed by Israel – is seen as a centre of Palestinian national identity that exists above both factional politics and disagreements over strategy.

A unifying idea, its significance as a national symbol is embraced by secular and religious, making it one of the conflict’s most dangerous flashpoints. The location – as commentators on both sides have been quick to point out – triggered the Second Intifada in 2000 after a similar Israeli political misjudgment when then opposition leader Ariel Sharon visited the site.

Justifying their suspicions about Israel’s motives, Palestinian religious officials and worshippers have pointed to their past experience over the Ibrahimi mosque-Tomb of the Patriarchs site in northern West Bank city of Hebron where they claim similar measures were used by Israel to control access.

All of which has led to the increasingly stark warnings. “Violence is likely to worsen absent a major policy shift,” said Ofer Zalzberg, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group. “Netanyahu’s mistake was installing the metal detectors without a Muslim interlocutor. It is the coercive character more than the security measure itself that made this unacceptable for Palestinians.”

Video: Israel’s extremism stoking Jerusalem violence



Ali Abunimah-23 July 2017

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is refusing to remove metal detectors at the gates of Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque compound, despite advice from the Israeli army and Shin Bet secret police that he should do so.
I told Al Jazeera English on Saturday evening that Netanyahu’s rejection of this advice is a further indication that his move is political – part of Israel’s plan to consolidate its control over al-Aqsa, one of the holiest sites for Muslims.
Watch the video above.

Four Palestinians shot and killed

On Saturday, 23-year-old Yousif Kashour was shot and fatally wounded near the Jerusalem village of al-Eizariya, as occupation forces continued to use live fire, tear gas and rubber-coated steel bullets against those protesting Israel’s moves to tighten control over al-Aqsa.
Kashour is the fourth Palestinian to be killed by Israeli gunfire since Friday. Also on Friday, three Israeli settlers were killed in a stabbing attack in the occupied West Bank.
A 17-year-old Palestinian was meanwhile killed by a landmine left by the Israeli army in the northern West Bank, the Palestinian health ministry stated on Saturday.
I told Al Jazeera English that the metal detectors were only the spark for the protests. The background to the violence is Israel’s attempt, spearheaded by government-backed Jewish extremists, to tighten control over the occupied East Jerusalem holy site, with the aim of eventually taking it over completely.

World governments not helping

On Saturday, Sweden, France and Egypt called for the UN Security Council to urgently meet to discuss Jerusalem.
I noted that the situation is not being helped by world governments that refuse to hold Israel, the occupying power, accountable.
The EU’s embassy in Tel Aviv, for instance, tweeted its condemnation of the killing of the three settlers, but remained silent about Israel’s earlier slayings of Palestinians protesting for their rights.

 condemns terror in  calls on all to work to restore calm, prevent further violence and loss of life https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en 
statement issued by the office of the EU foreign policy chief also fails to explicitly condemn Israeli killings of Palestinians, merely calling for an “investigation” of the deaths of the three protesters shot dead on Friday.
The Israeli human rights group B’Tselem has said that investigations by Israel systematically whitewash crimes against Palestinians and serve as a “fig leaf” for the military occupation.
On Sunday, Palestinians continued their protests, praying and staging sit-ins in the streets near the compound.

Two Jordanians die in shooting at Israeli embassy in Amman: security source

REFILE - ADDING RESTRICTIONS Policemen are seen near the Israeli embassy in Amman, Jordan July 23, 2017.

Suleiman Al-Khalidi-JULY 23, 2017

AMMAN (Reuters) - Two Jordanians died from wounds inflicted during a shooting on Sunday in the compound of the heavily-guarded Israeli embassy that also wounded an Israeli, police and a security source said.

Police said earlier that the two Jordanians worked for a furniture firm and entered the embassy compound before the shooting to do repairs. Police did not identify the wounded Israeli, and few other details were immediately available.

Israel has imposed a ban on reporting the incident and has made no public comment.

The fortress-like embassy in the affluent Rabae district of the capital Amman is protected by Jordanian gendarme. It has long been a flashpoint of anti-Israeli protests at times of turmoil in the Palestinian territories.

Violence against Israelis is rare in Jordan, a tightly policed country that is also a staunch regional ally of the United States and signed a peace treaty with Israel, the Arab neighbor with which it shares a long border.

Policemen are seen near the Israeli embassy in Amman, Jordan July 23, 2017.


But tensions have escalated between the two countries since Israel installed metal detectors at entry points to Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem after two Israeli policemen were shot dead by three Arab-Israeli gunmen on Friday near the site.

The new security measures have triggered the bloodiest spate of Israeli-Palestinian violence for years.
Jordan has called for the removal of the metal detectors and thousands of Jordanians have protested against the Israeli move in an outpouring of public anger against Israel.

Jordanian police said after Sunday's shooting that they sealed off the embassy compound and deployed dozens of anti-terrorism gendarmie forces.

"We have started a large scale investigation into the incident and ordered the prosecutor general to look at all the details," the police said in a statement.

Initial checks suggested the two Jordanian men had entered the embassy compound as workmen, the statement said.

Many of Jordan's 7 million citizens are of Palestinian origin. They or their parents or grandparents were expelled or fled to Jordan in the fighting that accompanied the creation of Israel in 1948.

Israel has in the past given repeated assurances that it understands Jordan's concerns and does not seek to alter the status quo in the Muslim holy sites of Jerusalem.

King Abdullah's Hashemite monarchy has been custodian of the sites since 1924, paying for their upkeep and deriving part of its legitimacy from the role.


Reporting by Suleiman Al-Khalidi; Additional reporting by Ori Lewis in Jerusalem; Editing by Gareth Jones and Daniel Wallis

Iran, Iraq sign deals to increase military cooperation


Iran official vows support for Iraqi unity of all ethnic groups

Iran parliament speaker Ali Larijani (above) met with Baghdad's Defence Minister Irfan al-Hayali on Sunday (AFP/file photo)

Sunday 23 July 2017 
Iran and Iraq on Sunday signed deals aimed at boosting military cooperation during a visit by Baghdad's Defence Minister Irfan al-Hayali to Tehran.
In a memorandum of understanding signed by Hayali and his Iranian counterpart Hossein Dehghan, the neighbours agreed on a "wide range of military and defence cooperation," state news agency IRNA reported.
“The expansion of cooperation and sharing experiences in the fields of fight against terrorism and extremism, border security, training, logistics, technical and military supports were included in the MoU,” IRNA said. 
Hayali, who was leading a military delegation, also met separately with parliament speaker Ali Larijani and Ali Shamkhani, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council.
Larijani and Shamkhani emphasised the importance of "unity".
"Iran supports the unity of all groups and ethnicities in Iraq," the state broadcaster's website quoted Larijani as telling Hayali.
Larijani also underlined the importance of preserving Iraqi unity "because if it wasn't for the emergence of political differences, the Islamic State (IS) group would not have been able to penetrate there".
The Iraqi minister acknowledged Iran's help in the fight against IS and also stressed the importance of unity.
Iraq's Kurdistan region has announced it will hold an independence referendum in September.
"We will not let any political side disintegrate Iraq," Hayali said.
In his talks with Hayali, Shamkhani warned that "secessionist approaches can become a platform... to prepare the ground for insecurity and instability".
Tehran has been a key supporter of Baghdad in its fight against IS and has provided Iraq with financial and military help.
Iran has its own Kurdish population along its borders with Iraq and Turkey, and does not want to see Iraq's Kurdish region become an independent state.
US President Donald Trump, a vocal critic of Iran’s 2015 deal with world powers to lift some sanctions on in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program, has taken a hard line on Tehran since he took office in January, Radio Liberty said.
The US military has voiced concern over Tehran’s expansion and influence not only in Iraq but also the region, including in Yemen and Syria.

This presidency can’t be saved. It’s all downhill from here.

President Trump has asked his advisers about his power to pardon people in connection to the Russia probe, according to people familiar with the effort. (Amber Ferguson/The Washington Post)

 

In light of news reports that President Trump’s team is scouring the record for conflicts of interest on special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team (the essence of chutzpah) and contemplating pardons (of aides and/or himself), it is worth considering how this may all play out.
We offer several scenarios:

1. Trump orders Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire Mueller. Sessions quits, as does Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein and Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand. Eventually someone agrees to fire Mueller. Republicans either will not pursue impeachment or are obliged to begin impeachment hearings but refuse to vote out articles of impeachment. In 2018, Democrats sweep to victory in the House and gain a seat or two in the Senate. Trump cannot be removed (two-thirds of the Senate is required for removal), but his presidency is in tatters. Some aides or ex-aides face criminal prosecution. LESSON: Republicans’ failure to stand up to Trump early dooms his presidency and crashes the GOP.

The story must be told.

Your subscription supports journalism that matters.

2. Trump orders Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire Mueller. Sessions quits, as does Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein and Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand. Eventually someone agrees to fire Mueller. Republicans, together with Democrats, pass by a veto-proof majority an independent prosecutor statute. Before impeachment proceedings can finish, Democrats sweep to victory in 2018 in the House and gain a seat or two in the Senate. Trump cannot be removed, but his presidency is in tatters. Some aides or ex-aides face criminal prosecution. LESSON: Fire Mueller, and Congress will hire him back.

3. Republicans join Democrats in warning Trump not to fire Mueller. Mueller remains and keeps digging. Mueller subpoenas damaging documents; Trump refuses to comply. A court orders him to comply. He doesn’t. We have a full-blown constitutional crisis. LESSON: Congress cannot delegate all responsibility to Mueller. It must conduct a parallel investigation and, if need be, commence impeachment proceedings.

4. Republicans join Democrats in warning Trump not to fire Mueller. Mueller remains and keeps digging. Mueller subpoenas damaging documents; Trump refuses to comply. A court orders him to comply. He declares this a witch hunt, an attack on his family (or whatever). Then he resigns, claiming he has already made America great. He tells the country that Vice President Pence will carry on in his place. LESSON: Congress must protect Mueller and preserve the possibility that Trump may be forced to resign.

5. Republicans join Democrats in warning Trump not to fire Mueller. Mueller subpoenas damaging documents. Trump complies. The evidence of collusion and/or obstruction is overwhelming. Mueller recommends prosecution or impeachment. The GOP turns on Trump, who is impeached and removed (with the GOP by that time possibly in the minority in one or both houses). LESSON: Congress must protect Mueller and pay the price for failure to oppose Trump’s nomination and election.

Is there a sixth scenario in which Mueller exonerates Trump? That’s the least likely outcome after Trump has fired former FBI director James B. Comey and threatened the special counsel. Why would he do those things unless there was something really, really bad to find? And if there is something bad, Mueller will find it. You can understand then why Trump sounds frantic. In no scenario does Trump’s presidency recover.