Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, July 22, 2017

President Sirisena’s political fate sealed by NCP imbroglio? 


article_image
by C.A.Chandraprema-July 22, 2017, 12:00 pm

The brawl that everyone saw taking place within the North Central Provincial Council on TV news bulletins last week was the outward signs of a new political development with far reaching political implications. The mace that was broken in the melee just about symbolised the impact this event would have on the political fortunes of the incumbent powers in the NCP and their political masters at the centre.  Even though there has been considerable turbulence in the North Central Provincial Council in recent weeks, with a full blown revolt among UPFA/SLFP members against the Sirisena loyalist Chief Minister Peshala Jayaratne, that was just a dispute within the ruling UPFA group. Even though we may not have seen anything as spectacular as this in a provincial council in the past, there have been plenty of disputes and even fisticuffs between members of ruling groups in PCs and local government institutions in the past as well.

Corruption: the third leg of a Government’s crooked stool

01
logo
Friday, 21 July 2017

If the human race is fallen, politics – perhaps – is where it shows most blushingly. It is, after all, the world’s oldest profession; having thrived before the fall. In the beginning, when God began to create all the other pastimes and vocations, there was chaos and darkness brooded over the deep… but who created the chaos? In case you’re thinking prostitution is the oldest profession, perhaps you can now attribute it to policy – or the creation of employment for fallen humanity by prediluvian politicos with their eye on the main chance or their preferential votes! Both branches of work have survived the fall, the flood, any future cataclysms or apocalypses.

But seriously folks. From time immemorial, maybe no other trade has embraced the trinity of fallenness more than government. Money, power, sex! There is nothing intrinsically wrong with any of this triad. Be that as it may, the uses, abuses, misuses, of all or each of our trio in a twin helix with another or a threesome with both others has given the media and moralists all the ammunition we need for our newssheets and scandal-mongering since the dawn of civilisation.

The Greeks gave us democracy, demagoguery, – and the delightfully debilitating use of a drachma to buy out our political opponents. Lucre! The Romans were mad about order, oratory, – and orgies. Lust! The Brits were not bashful about dividing and conquering, and disciplining and chastising. Lashes! Let me disabuse you of the notion that ‘Western civilisation’ – that lost art of living in a city – invented the unholy trinity of money, power, sex: just look at the Assyrians, Babylonians, Chaldeans, Egyptians, Mohenjodaro-Harappans, Huns, Hans, Mings, Mongols, et al., to know that any ‘oriental’ world order worth its salt knew how the games were played, as well as any ‘occidental’.

Lest we get carried away, let us return to the res. Maybe in a future column, when you have the time and I the inclination, we can deal pleasurably with sex or potently with power. For the purposes of the present, it is ‘money’ (wealth, resources, assets, treasury, haves, etc.) and its uses, abuses, misuses – ‘corruption’, not to coin a phrase – which arrests our attention. Not because the requisite arrests of criminal masterminds under a previous regime have been made as promised; not even under good governance: but because they haven’t, and they’re looking increasingly unlikely to be made for the duration of this pointlessly pontificating sharply cloven coalition.

That the incumbent administration has long since missed the bus to bag the crooked mandarins it ejected from places of power is clear. It is less clear whether it still desires to do so – or indeed whether it ever intended to do so in the first place. It might be immaterial what the truth is – for in politics as in prostitution, appearances are impressionable even if the performance is a consummation devoutly to be wished.

Crime of the century

02The first thing that any government serious about addressing, uprooting, eradicating, corruption in all its hydra-headed forms must do is set up a panoply of institutions, establishments, mechanisms to start lopping off this hydra’s heads. Of course, it is also precisely what any set of the powers that be – and will be, and would want to be again and again, under some guise of government in some fresh new incarnation of the same old trite, trite and tested, but failed new (old) political culture – who don’t want corruption done in will also do. It is exactly the same thing in a new mask. Under a previous systematically corrupt regime the existing agencies of law and instrumentalities of enforcing it were subversively dismantled or disregarded – and no major criminals guilty of fiscal or fiduciary wrongdoing were persecuted.

This is what the present administration had us believe, and it was an easy story to swallow because we had all seen and heard what the vagaries and vicissitudes of a conveniently protracted civil war could do to the probity of state, government, and sundry players in the fiesta of personal-familial financial harvesting. It was an unrepeatable era in many senses in which the most powerful politicians of their day were like grim reapers in fields of gold. Then the strong arm of destiny handed the opportunity of a political lifetime on a silver platter to the sea-green incorruptibles who promised that justice would not only be done but be seen to be done during their conceivably short term of office.

That nothing of the sort has occurred in a longer period than warrants such pusillanimity bodes ill for the democratic-republican ethos we craved. It speaks volumes for the fallenness of all political parties in general and specific pragmatic groupings in particular. Which, sadly, have to kowtow to the pragmatic demands of simultaneously pleasing the people while struggling to stay on top of their bed-mates in a strange political union once the honeymoon was over.

Subtlety lost on you?

There is now the unmanning spectacle of pragmatist marriage partners squabbling in public, much to the dismay of their admirers. Where once the party of the greens were looking like the Assyrian who came down like a wolf, their cohorts all gleaming in purple and gold, the UNP is now looking like – and being accused of – losing steam. Whether by default (“the fault is not ours but that of procedural delays and purposely placed roadblocks,” they plead) or by design (the opposition’s feeling is that there is pragmatic machination behind these omissions and failures of commissions) has to be seen.

Their lackadaisical pursuit of the previous powers that be has been interpreted by the leader of the badly split blue party as the greens playing politics in advance of an impending presidential election. Towards the Holy Grail of executive power our once- and only-once executive’s champions are now militating in favour of his return to the hustings in 2020. Which is to say, ironically enough, that the SLFP’s chief enemy qua the presidential race is not the UNP, but its brothers in the JO; and that the UNP’s safest hedge against Sirisena’s hegemony in time to come is to rouse the rabble in the JO now. The UNP’s detractors don’t see it as being above hunting with the hound of the PA’s former president while running with the hare of the UNP-SLFP coalition’s present president. It also stands accused of applying the brakes on key investigations against major players in the previous regime, in an ostensible move to use the weight of corrupt former officials against its now and future president.

To add injury to insult, the JO concurrently and simultaneously claims that the FCID in the hands of the UNP is nothing more than an axe of political vengeance wielded over their hapless heads. To add insult to injury, civil society including sections of the free media have charged that the UNP-led but SLFP-hamstrung government is either lacking in competence to prosecute the egregious wrongdoings of the previous regime, or long in the tooth as far as cynicism goes, never having intended to go as far as (say) bringing Gota, Basil, & Company to book… for fear of skeletons in their own closet. To add insidiousness to both injury/insult and insult/injury, the Central Bank bond scams and ostensible impunity for the coalition’s ruling party’s blue-eyed boys robbed the UNP of its high moral ground.

The greens didn’t quite expect such a grenade with its pin pulled to be lobbed into their, er, closet. It must be galling for them – the sea-green incorruptible among them, once the last best hope for a brighter cleaner Sri Lanka – to forego their reputation for probity and moral rectitude – for not only did they not speak up and out against sin in their camp (unthinkable for career politicos dependent on the goodwill of their party leadership), they blithely defended their prime minister’s erstwhile stubborn refusal to budge (unforgiveable for conscientious politicians democratically elected and accountable to the people, not the system).

Ironies

So we have a president grumbling long and loud that his prime minister’s party is blocking corruption investigations. (Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much. Since he no less and his compatriots no more are also under the microscope.) We have a former president rattling sabre about the political persecution he and his allegedly criminal cronies are facing. (Methinks that gentleman doth not protest long and loud enough. Really some people have too little shame and far too much scurrilous tactics.) And we have a prime minister and his party of closet, er I mean closest, confidantes pursuing their own agenda in terms of nation-building, constitution-reforming, and nest-feathering. (Methinks we should worry that neither he nor his cohorts protest at all, except when their blue-eyed boys are caught with their pinkies in the state cookie-jar.)

Corruption is not the bailiwick of any set of crooked governors. Governments from the time of Hammurabi to Hambantota’s “humbugs” have been culpable of bribery and other forms of criminal financial activity. Sad as it is to admit, those with arguably the best chance in democratic-donkey’s years of making a sea-change have faltered, flailed, and failed for one of three reasons:

a.    being cynical about not really wanting a change but appearing to;

b.    not being competent enough once in power to implement a good idea that came to them when they were out of power;

c.    being human/fallen enough to prioritise partisan agendas – winning elections, staying in power (sometimes deceiving themselves – and us – that the only way to ensure transformation is to retain one’s station in life…)

That is the only conclusion we readers reach while floating in a sea of no less than a dozen agents and instruments to investigate and indict corruption – ah! – but not a single big fish on the hooks to date…

Guess we have to be grateful that (living as we do in a ‘shame culture’) no sex scandals flutter like dirty linen on a public washing-line. On the other hand, the ‘fear factor’ leftover from a former regime’s most egregious abuses of power seems like a thing of the past… Given an exceptional flutter in the hearts of those who dared to speak truth to power at a time when government acted like the very villainous terrorists it eliminated so ruthlessly. But the ‘guilt’ bit, part by part, by hook or by crook, is still being dangled like bait before a gobsmacked public’s eyes… in which it is becoming harder by the day to say who the villain, who the vigilante, who the vindicated – and who’s to say that someone, somewhere, isn’t laughing all the way to the bank shouting out loud, “Lord, what fools these fallen mortals be!”?

Employees of ‘Rivira’ of Rajapakses not paid their salaries for 2 ½ months : Journalists in deep despair !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 22.July.2017, 11.30PM)    The staff over 200 in number including journalists of Rivira Media Corporation Ltd. which publishes ‘Rivira’ and ‘The Nation ‘ newspapers    run by the Medamulana Rajapakses  through Nilanka Rajapakse  a ‘shadow’ of shady Medamulana have not been paid their salaries for the last two and half months, based on reports reaching Lanka e news. 
These administrators alias beggars have told the staff last Thursday (20) who were working there  to collect Rs.5000.00 each as an allowance. The employees had refused to collect that sum, and demanded the full arrears of payment-  the two and half months salaries. 
The individual by the name of Sena Yadehiyage who purchased Richard Peiris in 2006 , soon  after Rajapakses came to power in 2005  launched the Rivira newspaper.  Later somewhere in 2008 , the Rajapakses who entertained the notion that all the media should be brought under their control bought the Rivira newspaper from Sena Yadehiyage through Nilanka Rajapakse and Prassanna Wickremesuriya who is a relative of Medamulana .Subsequently a popular casino magnate Ravi Wijeratne invested in Rivira. But with the defeat of the Rajapakses in 2014, Ravi Wijeratne quit Rivira.
Though Rivira publicized , it sold 6000 daily newspapers and about 100, 000 copies of its weekend newspaper , in truth only about 20000 newspapers were printed .  This Institution which was publishing daily and weekend newspapers along with a woman’s newspaper ,  Children’s newspaper ,  an astrology news magazine as well as a weekend English newspaper was on the decline day by day.

Owing to non payment of rent ,the printing establishment at Maradana had to be shifted , and a location at Borella had to be sought. Currently , the printing of the newspapers  is being carried out through  the printing establishment machineries  of Virakesari Co. A large sum of money is owing to Virakesari on this account.  
As is often the case ,  Nilanka Rajapakse being a crooked shadow of the equally or more crooked and corrupt Rajapakses  is a racketeer who is residing abroad .Therefore there  is no one to directly resolve the salary issues  of the staff .
The more pathetic aspect  to this dire  situation is  , the journalists who  expose the injustice  and woes faced by others is not  in a position to express their own predicament and plight through their own media .  It is only Lanka e news which always champions the cause of justice , truth and fair play come what may  is there to expose their abysmal sufferings   fearlessly , forthrightly and frankly. 
It is the duty  of those responsible to find a swift solution to these deeply afflicted media personnel without allowing the crooked and corrupt Rajapakses to save the culprit as usual and drive the affected and afflicted  into graver despair .
---------------------------
by     (2017-07-23 00:26:59)

Intoxicated police officers arbitrarily torture young man

Intoxicated police officers arbitrarily torture young man
ISSUES: Torture; impunity; rule of law; justice 

AHRC LogoJul 22, 2017

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information regarding Mr. Edirisinghe Mudiyanselage Samitha Lakmal (18), of No: 65/11, Deewaragama, Kantale in the Trincomalee District who lives in Kantale Police Division. He was severely tortured by two Police Officers attached to the Kantale Police Station and two other assailants who allegedly participated in the torture following the instructions of the Police. Later Samitha was admitted to the Kantale District Hospital for treatment and discharged two dayslater. Presently he is in hiding, in fear of his life and further harassment by the Police. The victim seeks justice.
Case Narrative:

Mr. Edirisinghe Mudiyanselage Samitha Lakmal (18), of No: 65/11, Deewaragama, Kantale in the Trincomalee District, just left school and was looking for a job. Samitha is a friendly and generous young man among the villagers. Following a request by a friend, on 13 June 2017, at 6:30 p.m. he went to the Kantale Water Reservoir with them in a three-wheeler. On their way, at the Bogaha Junction on the Kantale-Thrincomalee Road, they were obstructed by a car. Two police officers came out of the car, as well as two persons in plain clothes.

They started to assault Samitha and the other two men in the three-wheeler. Samitha could identify two police officers and two other persons in plainclothes. It was obvious that all four of them were under the influence of alcohol, quite intoxicated.

The two officers took the lead to beat Samitha, while the other two persons participated and supported the police officers in their assault. Samitha was beaten on his arms, legs, buttocks, back and chest. Samitha pleaded with the officers not to assault him, but in their drunken state the officers continued. After the Police left the scene, Samitha went to the water reservoir, bought fish and started to return home.

On his way back home, he was again stopped by the same police officers who began to assault him and his friends for the second time. They were not questioned or given any reason for this illegal behavior. Samitha then drove directly to the Kantale Police Station, where he made a written complaint of assault by two intoxicated police officers, and two in plain clothes. Samitha later went to the Kantale District Hospital for treatment, and was discharged the next day.

Since then, Samitha learned that the Police are waiting to illegally arrest and detain him, and file fabricated charges against him. For his safety, Samitha was forced to leave his village and hide. Presently he is living in fear of his life and further harassment by the Police.

Suggested Action:

Please send letters to the authorities listed below expressing your concern about this case. Request an immediate investigation into the allegations of torture by the Police, and prosecution of those proved to be responsible for misusing the powers of the State. The officers involved must also be subject to an internal investigation for breach of Police Departmental Orders. Please request the National Police Commission and the Inspector General of Police to open a special investigation into the malpractices of Police Officers who abuse their powers.

To support this case, please click here:

SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear _______
SRI LANKA: Intoxicated police officers arbitrarily torture young man
Name of Victims: Mr. Edirisinghe Mudiyanselage Samitha Lakmal (18), of No: 65/11, Deewaragama, Kantale in the Trincomalee District
Alleged perpetrators: Police Officers attached to the Kantale Police Station and two men who were in plain clothes
Date of incident: On 13 June 2017
Place of incident: Kantale Police Division

According to information I have received Mr. Edirisinghe Mudiyanselage Samitha Lakmal (18), of No: 65/11, Deewaragama, Kantale in the Trincomalee District, just left school and was looking for a job. Samitha is a friendly and generous young man among the villagers. Following a request by a friend, on 13 June 2017, at 6:30 p.m. he went to the Kantale Water Reservoir with them in a three-wheeler. On their way, at the Bogaha Junction on the Kantale-Thrincomalee Road, they were obstructed by a car. Two police officers came out of the car, as well as two persons in plain clothes.

They started to assault Samitha and the other two men in the three-wheeler. Samitha could identify two police officers and two other persons in plainclothes. It was obvious that all four of them were under the influence of alcohol, quite intoxicated.

The two officers took the lead to beat Samitha, while the other two persons participated and supported the police officers in their assault. Samitha was beaten on his arms, legs, buttocks, back and chest. Samitha pleaded with the officers not to assault him, but in their drunken state the officers continued. After the Police left the scene, Samitha went to the water reservoir, bought fish and started to return home.

On his way back home, he was again stopped by the same police officers who began to assault him and his friends for the second time. They were not questioned or given any reason for this illegal behavior. Samitha then drove directly to the Kantale Police Station, where he made a written complaint of assault by two intoxicated police officers, and two in plain clothes. Samitha later went to the Kantale District Hospital for treatment, and was discharged the next day.

Since then, Samitha learned that the Police are waiting to illegally arrest and detain him, and file fabricated charges against him. For his safety, Samitha was forced to leave his village and hide. Presently he is living in fear of his life and further harassment by the Police.

I request the intervention of your good offices to ensure that the authorities open an immediate investigation into the allegations of torture. The officers involved should also be subject to internal investigations for breach of Police Departmental Orders.
Yours sincerely,
---------------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
1. Mr. PujithJayasundara
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877
E-mail: igp@police.lk
2. Mr. Jayantha Jayasooriya PC
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk
3. Secretary
National Police Commission
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers
109 Galle Road
Colombo 03
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 395310
Fax: +94 11 2 395867
E-mail: npcgen@sltnet.lk or polcom@sltnet.lk
4. Secretary
Human Rights Commission
No. 36, Kynsey Road
Colombo 8
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk
Urgent Appeals Program

Deadly 'day of rage': Israel deploys armed patrols in East Jerusalem


Palestinian shop owners shut doors in solidarity strike after eight slain; PA breaks contact with Israel
Palestinians pray in protest of Israeli security measures at al-Aqsa compound (MEE/Jacob Burns)

Lubna Masarwa's picture
Lubna Masarwa-Saturday 22 July 2017

Tensions ran high in the Old City of East Jerusalem on Saturday amid predictions of a third intifada as Palestinian shop owners held a general strike to mourn the loss of five protesters who have died from violent clashes with Israeli police since the previous day. 

Bitter Palestinian rivalry adds to the agony of Gaza’s vulnerable

Cancer patients desperate for drugs: a stricken territory suffers fresh misery

Shifa hospital’s premature babies do not all survive as power is withheld for incubators, a blockade means shortages of medicine and they are refused transfer to Israel, Jerusalem or the West Bank. Photograph: Sarah Helm for the Observer

-Saturday 22 July 2017

IShifa hospital, Gaza, tiny premature babies, some with multiple infections, others with congenital diseases, lie packed together in incubators, struggling for life amid a tangle of tubes as lights flicker. With electricity virtually cut off, their life support is powered by a generator with a variable current.
The health of several of the babies is so poor they should have been transferred out of Gaza to modern intensive care units elsewhere, but permission to leave has been refused.

The decades-long agony of Gaza has moved into a new phase in which the very weakest lives of all are being sacrificed in a political power struggle played out beyond Gaza’s barrier wall.

In a disturbing new twist, the offensive bringing misery to the two million people who live here, most of them refugees, has been triggered by the Palestinian leadership in the West Bank, in collaboration with Israel.

A blockade, military and economic, imposed by land, air and sea, was first imposed by Israel 11 years ago to isolate and weaken Hamas, the Islamic resistance movement that took power in Gaza, but not in the West Bank, after winning elections.

In the West Bank, Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, rejected the result. When Israel moved to cut off Hamas in Gaza, Abbas – who also hates Hamas – added to the Gaza Strip’s misery by regularly starving it of overseas aid, which his authority administers because of a boycott of Hamas by the international community.

In recent weeks, believing Hamas to be weakened and sensing support from Israel and the US president Donald Trump, as well as others in the region, Abbas has moved to crush Hamas once and for all, using electricity cuts as his main weapon, knowing that power shortages would quickly cripple medical services, as well as water supplies.

Nowhere is the new intensified stranglehold more painful to observe than on the wards of Shifa. During the 2014 war, which killed more than 2,300 Palestinians, including about 500 children – leaving 1,000 permanently disabled – the beds were full of the injured. Today the doctors are struggling to save lives not damaged by bombs but by the impact of the blockade.


 Mohammad Shanty, who suffers from cystic fibrosis, sits next to his mother after receiving oxygen therapy during a power cut in their family house. Photograph: Mohammed Salem/Reuters

Kidney dialysis, intensive care and neonatal units are all in crisis. The Palestinian Authority in Ramallah on the West Bank has refused to pay for medicines, which are now critically depleted even for those in most need. Payments due to Israel each time patients are transferred are also being blocked, so that babies in need of critical care as well as cancer patients are refused permits to leave for treatment in the West Bank and Israel. Doctors say 10 cancer patients who have died in the past month could have been saved if they had been transferred.

As emergency cases back up in Gaza’s hospitals, other crises that have built up over the 11 years of siege and conflict are being brought to light. The immediate crisis in cancer care is exacerbated by the steep rise in cancer cases across Gaza, for which medical services were ill-equipped to start with.

According to Dr Khaled Thabet, head of oncology at Shifa, cancer rates in Gaza are rising steeply. He cites 90 cases per 100,000 people in 2016 compared with 65 in 2010. The rates are worryingly high given the unusually young population, with 60% of Gazans under 25. He blames the impact of three consecutive wars on Gaza, which have left poisonous elements in the soil and water, including depleted uranium. Daily use of insecticides by Israel to clear border areas is also blamed. Such is the shortage of clean water there are fears of cholera.

“I challenge the international scientists to come here and study the situation themselves, but they refuse,” he says. “It is a disaster. The UN comes here and says Gaza itself is dying and will be uninhabitable by 2020. But it does nothing.”

The new crisis has also shed light on the huge rise in babies born with congenital disabilities, who are all waiting in the queue to leave Gaza for specialist treatment. Studies proving the rise and connecting the defects to siege and war have been ignored by the outside world, say doctors here.

In the Shuja’iya area, blasted by shells in 2014, a young woman called Heba abu el Comboz, who has Down’s syndrome, talks to children in need every day. “Many of them live locked up in rooms and are never allowed out,” she says. “There is nobody to care for them and their family don’t want anyone to see them.”

She guides us down a dusty track to a neighbour, who also has Down’s, called Allam. Seven-year-old Allam sits beside her sister, Latifa, 15, who has a mental disability but who has never been diagnosed and receives no support.

Unli

ke some in Gaza, the family cannot afford to buy battery-run generators to boost electricity, so at night they sit in candlelight. Water has also been cut off, with the system functioning only once a week. Inhabitants are forced to pay for deliveries by water tankers. The girls’ father used to work in Israel earning “good money” until the siege, says their mother.

Across the wasteland is a huge cement wall, a newly constructed section of Israel’s barrier, which Tel Aviv says is necessary to prevent rocket attacks on towns inside Israel.

“Our prison,” says Heba, smiling. When she was invited to an international conference for people with Down’s syndrome, Israel refused her a permit to leave.

“We are a civilised people. We have the highest education in the Middle East. We are being bombed and besieged back to the middle ages,” says Raji Sourani, director of the Palestinian Centre for Human rights.


A baby born with congenital heart disease in Shifa hospital’s neonatal unit. Photograph: Sarah Helm for the Observer

Outside, in the more affluent Rimal area of Gaza City, the shops seem full and the streets buzz, but the expensive goods are imported largely from Israel or through the tunnels that are still being dug under the border with Egypt, despite Israel’s attempt to destroy them. At the end of the street the Mediterranean laps, green with raw sewage as far as Tel Aviv.

In the centre of Gaza City, scores of international donors and aid agencies sit in air-conditioned offices. If they are protesting about what they see, nobody is listening. Restricted in their movements for “security reasons”, they see little on the ground and fear to speak out in case Israel bans them from Gaza.

“It is a plan,” says one local activist, whose anguished words are echoed up and down the Gaza Strip. “The world outside doesn’t want to know. Everyone wants us to die. That’s it. Because the last three wars did not destroy us they all want us to destroy ourselves.”

Every household seems to tell a new story of suffering, particularly in the refugee camps. Rema Frainah, of Aisha, a local community group, says domestic abuse has reached critical levels as a despairing population is crushed together in unbearable conditions.

Meanwhile, in the neonatal unit, the light above a premature seven-month-old stops flashing, but this is not an electricity cut. The baby has given up the struggle. A young father is standing by. Shock, then anguish, passes across his face. We meet him later at home in the Jabalia refugee camp,
birthplace of the 1987 intifada, where his wife and 15 members of his family live in a house where plastic flaps at the window. His wife’s mother, Maher, says premature births and miscarriages are more common than ever. She has a nephew with brain damage, and two doors down a neighbour’s son was recently born with hepatitis. “So the husband divorced the wife,” she says, “and the baby died.”

She talks also of the majnoun – “the mad people” – who are everywhere. Then she laughs. “We are all mad. What do you expect?”

A shuffling man appears, paralysed down one side. This is Maher’s husband. “He was a boy stone-thrower in the first intifada,” she says, referring to the uprising of 1987. “The Israelis arrested him and beat him up. He has been brain-damaged ever since.”

I ask them whether they think there will be a new intifada. Are they going to rise up against Hamas? They laugh. “Of course not. Who would notice? They want us to get rid of their enemy. Why should we? For us, nothing will change.”

NATO, Russian Troops Rattle Swords Along Hundreds of Miles of Borderland


Across Eastern Europe, Moscow and the transatlantic alliance are staging large-scale exercises to show they mean business
NATO, Russian Troops Rattle Swords Along Hundreds of Miles of Borderland

No automatic alt text available.BY PAUL MCLEARY-JULY 18, 2017

Tens of thousands of troops are on the move from the Baltic to the Black Sea, as NATO and Russia open up a series of massive military exercises the size of which the continent hasn’t seen since the Cold War.

Both sides claim the drills, which involve aircraft, warships, tanks and artillery, are purely defensive in nature. But it is clear the exercises are also meant to show off new capabilities and technologies, and display not only the strength of alliances, but how swiftly troops and heavy equipment can move to squash a threat at the frontier.

The most ambitious undertaking on the NATO side is Saber Guardian 17, a series of over a dozen distinct battle drills being carried out by 25,000 troops from 20 countries moving across Hungary,

Romania and Bulgaria.

The scenario presented to ground commanders is that a technologically advanced land force has pushed into NATO territory and is threatening the alliance as a whole. The drills include air defense tests, live fire tank engagements, long advances by armored columns, fighter planes and helicopters supporting ground movements, electronic warfare, and airdrops.

“Deterrence is about capability, it’s about making sure that any potential adversary knows that we are prepared to do whatever is necessary,” U.S. Army Europe commander Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges told reporters during the exercise. “What escalates tensions is when we look weak, not connected, not prepared, that is what invites aggression.”

But increasing military capability doesn’t have to mean war, he added. “The Russians only respect strength, so if we demonstrate cohesion, if we demonstrate that we are together, that we are prepared, then I think we don’t have to worry.”

The general’s blunt comments underscore the planning for Saber Guardian, which doesn’t name Russia as the adversary, but clearly has the Kremlin in mind.

The scenario revolves around an incursion into NATO territory by a militarily advanced enemy intent on seizing the economic assets of Black Sea countries. A battle featuring 5,000 NATO troops at the Cincu training range in Romania saw U.S. Apache and Romanian helicopters coordinate with artillery on the ground, U.S. Abrams tanks, and 650 vehicles in support of a large infantry movement to halt the advance.

The U.S. is planning to spend about $23 million on the sprawling Romanian base in order to conduct even larger, more complex battle drills there in the future.

On the other side of the deterrent fence stands Russia, which is preparing to surge as many as 100,000 troops into the field in a series of drills dubbed Zapad, or “West” in the coming weeks.

The Kremlin claims about 12,700 troops will be active in Belarus and Russia for Zapad. But experts and NATO officials say Moscow is more likely to conduct a series of engagements that will swell those ranks by tens of thousands. Under the Vienna Document agreement of 2011, foreign observers must be present for any exercise that exceeds 13,000 troops.

By coming in under that number while conducting several other large drills at the same time, Moscow can avoid the presence of observers and control the narrative of how its troops performed.

But NATO is wary.

Given that Russia used a massive military exercise in 2014 to obscure its incursion into Crimea, and invaded South Ossetia in Georgia in 2008 during another exercise that covered troop movements, the alliance is keeping a close eye on Zapad.

“From previous experiences related to previous exercises, we have every reason to believe there may be substantially more troops participating than the official quoted numbers,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said recently when asked about Zapad.

“We don’t consider this year’s Zapad exercise in itself to be a direct threat to [NATO] or a cover for an attack,” added Kristjan Prikk, undersecretary for defense policy at Estonia’s Ministry of Defense during a conference in Washington on July 11. “But we have to keep in mind that the Russians have the nasty habit of hiding their actual military endeavors behind exercises.”

The last Zapad, in 2014, focused on displaying how quickly Russia could move forces from one part of the country to another, and illustrated how the Kremlin underplays the number of troops involved in its intertwined military drills.

Moscow claimed about 22,000 troops took part in 2014, but outside observers later concluded that up to 70,000 were involved, once all of the smaller but related exercises were added up.

Whatever number of troops ultimately take part, Moscow is “going to very actively signal what they can and cannot do militarily,” said Olga Oliker of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And the fact that Russia often conducts nuclear exercises in conjunction with conventional movements adds an extra element of uncertainty for NATO and the West.

This year, “I’m looking to see what Kaliningrad’s role is in the exercise, and what supporting and concurrent exercises are being held in Belarus and Kaliningrad,” the Russian exclave on the Baltic Sea, Oliker said.

Three Chinese warships are slated to arrive in Kaliningrad in July 21 to take part in a series of drills with the Russian navy and air force.

The upcoming week’s worth of activities will include anti-submarine and anti-ship operations, and practice between the two nations communicating and coordinating while fighting. “The main aims of the exercise are to increase the efficiency in cooperation of the two fleets to counter threats to security at sea, [and] train compatibility of the crews of Russian and Chinese combat ships,” the Russian Defense Ministry said.

The naval activity in the Baltic comes months after NATO established new brigades in Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, beefed up by prepositioned American tanks and heavy armored vehicles.

In June, the U.S. Air Force also sent B-1 and B-52 bombers to Europe to participate in the massive BALTOPs exercise with Baltic allies, which included 50 allied ships running through a series of defensive maneuvers to protect NATO’s northern flanks.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Army deployed a Patriot anti-aircraft missile system in Lithuania for use in yet another NATO wargame, marking the first time the system has been brought to the Baltic region where Russia enjoys a robust air and missile defense capability. The deployment is temporary, U.S. officials cautioned, but officials in Lithuania are looking at purchasing the system. Romania recently committed to a $3.9 billion deal for seven Patriot missile defense systems in July.

Closer to Russia’s borders and Crimea is another NATO exercise related to Saber Guardian, dubbed Sea Breeze 2017. The 12-day naval exercise currently underway in the Black Sea is co-hosted by the U.S. and Ukraine, and features the U.S. Navy cruiser USS Hue City and the destroyer USS Carney, which join 16 other countries in the Odessa-based undertaking. American surveillance plans and a team of Navy SEALs are also participating.

The naval exercises will be closely watched by Russian forces, who are active in the Black Sea, and have vastly improved their surveillance capabilities in Crimea. Over the past year, Russian aircraft have repeatedly buzzed American warships and aircraft in international waters in the Black Sea, drawing protests from Washington.

In February, an armed Russian aircraft buzzed the USS Porter, and in May armed Russian jets came within feet of U.S. surveillance planes operating over the waterway.

Photo Credit: DIMITAR DILKOFF/AFP/Getty Images

In tweet storm, Trump decries ‘illegal leaks’ and asserts ‘all agree’ he has complete power to pardon

Louis Seidman, professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law, explains why even though President Trump could use his executive privilege to pardon himself, it may not be a good idea. (Video: Ashleigh Joplin/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
   


NORFOLK, Va. — A defiant President Trump unleashed a flurry of nearly a dozen tweets Saturday morning, asserting that he has the “complete power to pardon” aides, family members and possibly even himself — an apparent response to the special counsel’s widening Russia probe — and decrying “illegal leaks” in the “FAKE NEWS.”

The president also lashed out at a new Washington Post report of previously undisclosed alleged contacts between Attorney General Jeff Sessions — at the time a U.S. senator and senior adviser to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign — and a Russian official. In a tweet, Trump called the disclosures an illegal new “intelligence leak,” part of his continuing effort to try to shift the public focus to what he claims is a partisan attempt to undermine his presidency.

The president's defense of his pardoning authority came days after The Post reported that he and his legal team have discussed his power to pardon those close to him, including himself.

Shortly after his tweet storm, which started just after 6:30 a.m. and lasted nearly two hours, Trump flew to Norfolk, Va., where he injected a small dose of partisan politics into the ceremonial commissioning of a new naval warship.

Speaking aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford, Trump extolled the virtues of the “wonderful, beautiful but very, very powerful” nuclear-powered warship — “We will win, win, win,” he said, “we will never lose” — but also decried the budget compromise known as sequestration, which requires mandatory and corresponding military and domestic cuts.

Trump promised to try to restore higher levels of military funding but also urged the crowd of about 6,500 — many in uniform — to help him push this year’s budget, in which he said he will seek an additional $54 billion in defense spending, through Congress.

“I don’t mind getting a little hand, so call that congressman and call that senator and make sure you get it,” he said, to applause. “And by the way, you can also call those senators to make sure you get health care.”

But Trump’s brief appeal created a potentially awkward tableau at a commissioning event intended to be ceremonial — a commander in chief offering political remarks, and what could even be construed as an order, to the naval officers he commands.

The president’s 17-minute speech aboard the naval vessel here, as well as his frenzied social media assertions Saturday — which veered between proclamations of innocence and frustration — came as Trump is struggling to stabilize his presidency, just six months in. He and several family members, including his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, are facing mounting legal questions about their involvement in possible collusion between the president’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

And on Friday, Trump implemented the most dramatic, if potentially unintended, overhaul of his White House so far, installing wealthy financier Anthony Scaramucci as his new communications director — a move that set off an unexpected chain reaction of resignations (White House press secretary Sean Spicer) and promotions (deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, into Spicer’s spot at the podium). 

Trump's morning tweets began with an assertion that the president  has “complete power to pardon” in an apparent allusion to the ongoing probe into his campaign's contacts with Russian officials. And he lashed out at a new Washington Post report of previously undisclosed alleged contacts, calling the disclosures “illegal leaks” as he continues to try to shift the public focus to what he has said is a partisan attempt to undermine his presidency.

The president's defense of his pardon powers came days after The Post reported that he and his legal team have discussed his power to pardon aides, family members and, possibly, even himself. Trump aides said the president is merely curious about his powers and the limits of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's investigation into Russia's attempt to tamper with the 2016 presidential election.
Currently, the discussions of pardoning authority by Trump’s legal team are purely theoretical, according to two people familiar with the ongoing conversations. But if Trump pardoned himself in the face of the ongoing Mueller investigation, it would set off a legal and political firestorm, first around the question of whether a president can use the constitutional pardon power in that way.

While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us.FAKE NEWS
In another tweet, Trump continued his campaign to discredit the investigation as based on leaks of information from political enemies aimed at undermining him. The Post reported late Friday that U.S. intelligence officials had collected information that Russia's ambassador to the United States had told superiors that he had discussed campaign-related matters and policies important to Moscow last year with Jeff Sessions, then a senator who had endorsed Trump.

A new INTELLIGENCE LEAK from the Amazon Washington Post,this time against A.G. Jeff Sessions.These illegal leaks, like Comey's, must stop!
As he has before, Trump also reiterated on Twitter his view that Hillary Clinton's campaign should be under greater scrutiny, and he contended that his son Donald Trump Jr. “openly” disclosed emails concerning a meeting with a Russian lawyer during the campaign — even though Trump Jr. did so after the New York Times obtained the emails and was preparing to publish a report on them.

Sessions, who is now attorney general, had initially failed to disclose his meetings with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during his confirmation process; when they were made public in news reports, he insisted he had met with Kislyak only in his capacity as a senator and had not discussed campaign issues. But The Post reported that U.S. intelligence agencies intercepted communications that showed Kislyak indicated he had “substantive” discussions on matters including Trump’s positions on Russia-related issues and prospects for U.S.-Russia relations in a Trump administration.


The accounts from Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to his superiors, intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, contradict public assertions by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The Post's Greg Miller explains. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)

Trump has denounced what he has called illegal leaks in the ongoing FBI investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian officials. U.S. intelligence agencies have said Moscow meddled in the campaign, stealing thousands of emails and other documents from Democratic Party officials and releasing them publicly to embarrass the Democratic presidential nominee, Clinton, and to assist Trump. Trump has said repeatedly that he did not collude with Russian officials and called accounts of the meetings between his campaign and Russian operatives a partisan attack by Democrats to avenge their loss in the election. But he and some of his top aides have hired private criminal defense lawyers to deal with the probe.

In his tweet, Trump was referring to former FBI director James B. Comey, whom the president fired over his handling of the Russia probe. Comey later testified to Congress that he had felt pressure from Trump over the investigation and, after he was dismissed, released memos of his encounters with Trump to the media. The public disclosures helped lead to Mueller taking over the investigation.

 (Trump's tweet also refers to Amazon.com, the online retailer led by Jeffrey P. Bezos, who also owns The Post.)

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on what she called a “wholly uncorroborated intelligence intercept” and reiterated that Sessions had not discussed interference in the election. Trump has been angered that Sessions recused himself from the Russia probe. The president told the New York Times this week that he would not have named Sessions as attorney general if he had known he would do so.

In yet another tweet, Trump attacked the Times for reports that Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, whose death in a Russian airstrike had been speculated last month, is still alive, according to Pentagon officials. Gen. Tony Thomas has told reporters that a Times story in 2015 about using certain data to track Islamic State fighters that was gleaned in the Abu Sayaf raid resulted in U.S. forces losing the trail to Baghdadi. Thomas mentioned the issue again at the Aspen security forum this week Friday and his remarks were featured in a Fox News report, according to the Times.
The Pentagon raised no objections with The Times before the story was published, and no senior American official ever complained publicly about it until now.
The Failing New York Times foiled U.S. attempt to kill the single most wanted terrorist,Al-Baghdadi.Their sick agenda over National Security
His tweets came a day after Sean Spicer resigned as press secretary in the wake of Trump's hiring of New York financier Anthony Scaramucci as his communications director. Sarah Huckabee Sanders was promoted to the press secretary role.


When did Britain become family in the European Union?

We may analyse Europe as a process. Europe grew as an entity from wars among nations, gripped in warfare over centuries. It had winners and losers, most often it was losers.


by Victor Cherubim-
( July 22, 2017, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) Britain’s Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, stated in Parliament earlier this week, “EU leaders can go whistle” amid claims that Britain’s withdrawal bill could be as high as Euro 100 billion (£87.6 bn. and EU Negotiator Barnier said in response “I am not hearing any whistling, just the clock ticking.”
In Round 2 of the negotiations on Brexit in Brussels, we see Britain is under pressure to be willing to action key aspects of EU plans, which no longer command a majority in Parliament.
There is no change in the belief that all details will be hammered out in 20 months. Thus a longer transition period may be required. Whether this can be negotiated is a separate question.
There seems to be two sticking points:
1. The financial settlement.
2. The fundamentals of Britain’s future relationship.
With the slender majority, the most noticeable feature inside Parliament is to minimise the number of votes in the Commons. Legislation is to be the last resort, not the first.
Britain and the EU are poles apart
We have to understand the background of Europe and the origins, traditions and unwritten laws and conventions in UK to wonder why after 40 odd years of association, the time is now for a separation of ways.
We may analyse Europe as a process. Europe grew as an entity from wars among nations, gripped in warfare over centuries. It had winners and losers, most often it was losers.
Britain on the other hand barely recovered from the economic and social trauma of World War I. Some historians would say, it hardly recovered from World War II, aside from the moral high ground.
Europe was able to dominate the world for 500 years previous, with United States rebuilding Europe after the Second World War with Marshall Plan of US$13 billion (say $130 bn in current values). European domination as some would say was an accident of history.
On the other hand, United Kingdom came out of being an Imperial Power but really wanted to hold on to its status as a world power. After WWII, Winston Churchill said that “there should be a European Union, a sort of United States of Europe, but Britain should not be in it”.
EU and Britain are both poles apart because each sees things differently; they have a different view of politics, economics, law and life.
Britain is an island, detached from the Continent. Europe is a mainland. They are as close as neighbours but their mindset is so far apart. The Sun newspaper iconic headline: “Up Yours Delors”. (Jacques Delors was European Commissioner 1985-1995).
Britain perhaps didn’t need Europe, so much so on Black Wednesday in 1992 it “crashed out” of the Euro. Britain felt it was ruled by barmy Brussels bureaucrats and
“po faced EU pen pushers” who liked to ban pounds and ounces ( British weights and measures),bendy bananas and force Britain into “Eurocondoms”.
The signs of acrimony were ahead, even before the row over British beef during the BSE crisis. Europe is methodical, however, in Britain, legitimacy and consensual politics is the order of the day. Europe considers public opinion as “fuddy duddy.” Britain has an “atlantic” view on economic competition, market outcomes, and freedom to act within the law. In Europe, “you do what we tell you.”
In Britain, if something does not work you change it. It perhaps can be stated, that the EU would hardly show flexibility, because that is not how it works. We have seen and are seeing a clash of mindsets: one pragmatic, the other dogmatic.
EU could not tolerate Britain at heart?
Time and again, over the years of membership of the EU, Britain always wanted things done differently. Britain was seen to be a reluctant partner. We see the clash over the Common Agricultural Policy; the opting out of the Euro, Britain always wanted concessions, whether on Gibraltar, Northern Ireland border issues, on a politically United Europe.
Europe was fed up of giving permanent concessions, as far as they saw it, to Britain, whilst the other members went along with the majority. Was the EU Referendum, a blessing in disguise?
It is very difficult for Euro members to, allow, accept or tolerate London to remain the trading centre for Europe and for the Euro. The volume of Euro/Dollar trading alone was some $600 billion a day in 2016. Who would tolerate such a high proportion of financial activity of their currency taking place abroad? Small wonder why France is waiting for Brexit, while smiling at Theresa May?
Europe and UK was a marriage of convenience for both. They were not my words, but the words of Guy Verhofstadt, a diehard Belgian Europhile, of the European Parliament, who took a swipe at Britain.
But it would be unfair to sum up that the EU wanted to see the back of UK. In actual reality, they both wanted each other. They looked to each other to speak with one voice, on most, if not all matters. Britain could never play ball on these terms? Britain was too shrewd; she only wanted Europe as a trading partner?
Negotiation v negotiation
1. The EU still believes it will win, why, because it refuses to believe that the UK
will walk out? It has misjudged how UK politics works in the past? We see the shock in the faces of EU negotiators who may finally come to understand that Theresa May is “dead serious” that: no deal is better than a bad deal.”
Much of the tough talk on EU side is because they think Britain is bluffing.
It seems like a dogmatic voice hitting a pragmatic ear.
2. Britain maintains you cannot pick and choose the referee for legal disputes after
Brexit. The jurisdiction of European Courts of Justice may end in respect at least for regulating the movement of nuclear materials or pharmaceuticals across borders.
3. The strangest of all situations is that both the EU and Britain are in negotiation. But, neither of them hears what is said by the other, or so it seems. This is the saddest story. There is denial of seriousness on both sides. This denial may after all cost both sides.
4. EU has misjudged the UK at every turn over centuries. Each side truly believes that other is deluded. There is a very real risk of a no deal outcome. Some say, Britain has prepared for this scenario since joining the Common Market.
A positives outcome
Everyone is talking. A round of talks will take place in Brussels every month after taking summer recess until October 2017. Perhaps, a breakthrough may come about by chance.
I consider, Britain to be pragmatic to bring about a positive outcome and the bell will determine the rest. Who knows?