Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, July 21, 2017

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer Resigns, Citing Disagreement Over Hire

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer Resigns, Citing Disagreement Over Hire

No automatic alt text available.BY BETHANY ALLEN-EBRAHIMIAN-JULY 21, 2017

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer resigned on Friday after President Donald Trump offered the position of White House communications director to Trump fundraiser Anthony Scaramucci, according to the New York Times.

Spicer was also serving as the communication director in addition to his duties as press secretary.
Spicer’s tenuous status and his anticipated fall from grace has long been a topic of speculation in Washington. Trump often contradicted Spicer in his tweets and public comments, and White House aides leaked word of the president’s dissatisfaction with Spicer’s performance. Rumors swirled from early in Spicer’s tenure that Trump was unhappy with Spicer, especially after comedian Melissa McCarthy’s devastating caricature of him on Saturday Night Live as a petty, angry spokesman delivering fabricated facts.

Trump reportedly did not like the idea of a female comedian portraying Spicer, and that it made one of his staff look “weak.”

In June, deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders replaced Spicer in daily White House press briefings, fueling speculation that his firing was imminent.

Surely one of Spicer’s most memorable lines as press secretary came on May 31. When asked what “covfefe” meant — the apparent typo that Trump tweeted out late one evening that soon became an immensely popular meme — Spicer did not acknowledge any mistake on the part of the president, instead replying, “The president and a small group of people know exactly what he meant.”
Spicer posted on Twitter that he would stay on until the end of August, saying it had been a “honor & privilege” to work for the president:
It's been an honor & a privilege to serve @POTUS@realDonaldTrump & this amazing country. I will continue my service through August
Scaramucci, like Trump, hails from New York; and also like Trump, he brings little direct experience to his new position. Scaramucci made a name for himself as a Wall Street hedge fund manager and has made regular TV appearances himself but has not worked in press relations. A fundraiser for Trump during the campaign, Scaramucci then served as the White House liaison to the business community.

At an on-camera White House press briefing on July 21, his first public appearance since being tapped for communications director, Scaramucci channeled the id of the Trump administration, at one point saying, “The president’s a winner, and we’re going to do a lot of winning” and mentioning that he had been “very very loyal” to Trump.

Scaramucci dodged tough questions with the deftness of a slick financier. Responding to one question about the administration’s use of the term “fake news” and its overall treatment of the media, Scaramucci said that there is “a little bit of media bias out there,” expressing hope that the administration can “de-escalate that and turn that around.”

His smooth demeanor contrasted with Spicer’s tendency to get flustered when reporters pressed him on thorny issues.

Scaramucci also offered parting words for his predecessor.

“I love the guy, and I wish him well, and I hope he goes on to make a tremendous amount of money.”
Below, as a final parting ode to the outgoing press secretary, is McCarthy’s inaugural skit featuring herself as a hostile, gum-chewing, podium-wielding Spicer:


This piece has been updated to include comments from the July 21 press briefing.


Alex Wong/Getty Images

Trump team seeks to control, block Mueller’s Russia investigation

 The Washington Post's Carol Leonnig explains how President Trump and his lawyers are attempting to deflect special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. (Victoria Walker, Peter Stevenson, Ashleigh Joplin/The Washington Post)



Some of President Trump’s lawyers are exploring ways to limit or undercut special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation, building a case against what they allege are his conflicts of interest and discussing the president’s authority to grant pardons, according to people familiar with the effort.

Trump has asked his advisers about his power to pardon aides, family members and even himself in connection with the probe, according to one of those people. A second person said Trump’s lawyers have been discussing the president’s pardoning powers among themselves.

One adviser said the president has simply expressed a curiosity in understanding the reach of his pardoning authority, as well as the limits of Mueller’s investigation.

“This is not in the context of, ‘I can’t wait to pardon myself,’ ” a close adviser said.

President Trump suggested the special prosecutor's team might not be fair, impartial investigators because of previous political contributions, legal clients and personal friends. (Meg Kelly/The Washington Post)

With the Russia investigation continuing to widen, Trump’s lawyers are working to corral the probe and question the propriety of the special counsel’s work. They are actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work, according to several of Trump’s legal advisers.

A conflict of interest is one of the possible grounds that can be cited by an attorney general to remove a special counsel from office under Justice Department regulations that set rules for the job.

Responding to this story on Friday after it was published late Thursday, one of Trump’s attorneys, John Dowd, said it was “not true” and “nonsense.”

“The president’s lawyers are cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller on behalf of the president,” he said.

Other advisers said the president is also irritated by the notion that Mueller’s probe could reach into his and his family’s finances.

Trump has been fuming about the probe in recent weeks as he has been informed about the legal questions that he and his family could face. His primary frustration centers on why allegations that his campaign coordinated with Russia should spread into scrutinizing many years of Trump dealmaking. He has told aides he was especially disturbed after learning Mueller would be able to access several years of his tax returns.



Trump has repeatedly refused to make his tax returns public after first claiming he could not do so because he was under audit or after promising to release them after an IRS audit was completed. All presidents since Jimmy Carter have released their tax returns.

“If you’re looking at Russian collusion, the president’s tax returns would be outside that investigation,” said a close adviser to the president.

Further adding to the challenges facing Trump’s outside lawyers, the team’s spokesman, Mark Corallo, resigned on Thursday. Corallo confirmed Friday that he has resigned but declined to comment further.

Corallo’s departure is part of a larger restructuring of Trump’s team undertaken in recent days. Marc Kasowitz, Trump’s New York-based personal attorney who had been leading the effort, will take a reduced role, people familiar with the team said. Meanwhile, veteran Washington lawyer Dowd, hired last month, will take the lead in responding to the special counsel and congressional inquiries. Jay Sekulow, a lawyer who has been a familiar face in conservative media in recent years, will serve as the group’s public face, appearing frequently on television.

Sekulow said in an interview Thursday that the president and his legal team are intent on making sure Mueller stays within the boundaries of his assignment as special counsel. He said they will complain directly to Mueller if necessary.

“The fact is that the president is concerned about conflicts that exist within the special counsel’s office and any changes in the scope of the investigation,” Sekulow said. “The scope is going to have to stay within his mandate. If there’s drifting, we’re going to object.”

Sekulow cited Bloomberg News reports that Mueller is scrutinizing some of Trump’s business dealings, including with a Russian oligarch who purchased a Palm Beach mansion from Trump for $95 million in 2008.

“They’re talking about real estate transactions in Palm Beach several years ago,” Sekulow said. “In our view, this is far outside the scope of a legitimate investigation.”

 The president has long called the FBI investigation into his campaign’s possible coordination with the Russians a “witch hunt.” But now, Trump is coming face-to-face with a powerful investigative team that is able to study evidence of any crime it encounters in the probe — including tax fraud, lying to federal agents and interference in the investigation.

“This is Ken Starr times 1,000,” said one lawyer involved in the case, referring to the independent counsel who oversaw an investigation that eventually led to House impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton. “Of course, it’s going to go into his finances.”

Following Trump’s decision to fire FBI Director James B. Comey — in part because of his displeasure with the FBI’s Russia investigation — Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel in a written order. That order gave Mueller broad authority to investigate links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, as well as “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation” and any crimes committed in response to the investigation, such as perjury or obstruction of justice.

Mueller’s probe has already expanded to include an examination of whether Trump obstructed justice in his dealings with Comey, as well as the business activities of Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law.
Trump’s team could potentially challenge whether a broad probe of Trump’s finances prior to his candidacy could be considered a matter that arose “directly” from an inquiry into possible collusion with a foreign government.

The president’s legal representatives have also identified what they allege are several conflicts of interest facing Mueller, such as donations to Democrats by some of his prosecutors.

Another potential conflict claim is an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011, two White House advisers said. A spokesman for Mueller said there was no dispute when Mueller, who was FBI director at the time, left the club.

Trump also took public aim on Wednesday at Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Rosenstein, whose actions led to Mueller’s appointment. In an interview with the New York Times Wednesday, the president said he never would have nominated Sessions if he knew he was going to recuse himself from the case.

Some Republicans in frequent touch with the White House said they viewed the president’s decision to publicly air his disappointment with Sessions as a warning sign that the attorney general’s days were numbered. Several senior aides were described as “stunned” when Sessions announced Thursday morning he would stay on at the Justice Department.

Another Republican in touch with the administration described the public steps as part of a broader effort aimed at “laying the groundwork to fire” Mueller.

“Who attacks their entire Justice Department?” this person said. “It’s insane.”

Law enforcement officials described Sessions as increasingly distant from the White House and the FBI because of the strains of the Russia investigation.

Traditionally, Justice Department leaders have sought to maintain a certain degree of autonomy from the White House as a means of ensuring prosecutorial independence.

But Sessions’s situation is more unusual, law enforcement officials said, because he has angered the president for apparently being too independent while also angering many at the FBI for his role in the president’s firing of Comey.

As a result, there is far less communication among those three key parts of the government than in years past, several officials said.

Currently, the discussions of pardoning authority by Trump’s legal team are purely theoretical, according to two people familiar with the ongoing conversations. But if Trump pardoned himself in the face of the ongoing Mueller investigation, it would set off a legal and political firestorm, first around the question of whether a president can use the constitutional pardon power in that way.
“This is a fiercely debated but unresolved legal question,” said Brian C. Kalt, a constitutional law expert at Michigan State University who has written extensively on the question.

The power to pardon is granted to the president in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, which gives the commander in chief the power to “grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” That means pardon authority extends to federal criminal prosecution but not to state level or impeachment inquiries.

No president has sought to pardon himself, so no courts have reviewed it. Although Kalt says the weight of the law argues against a president pardoning himself, he says the question is open and predicts such an action would move through the courts all the way to the Supreme Court.
“There is no predicting what would happen,” said Kalt, author of the book, “Constitutional Cliffhangers: A Legal Guide for Presidents and Their Enemies.” It includes chapters on the ongoing debate over whether presidents can be prosecuted while in office and on whether a president can issue a pardon to himself.

Other White House advisers have tried to temper Trump, urging him to simply cooperate with the probe and stay silent on his feelings about the investigation.

On Monday, lawyer Ty Cobb, newly brought into the White House to handle responses to the Russian probe, convened a meeting with the president and his team of lawyers, according to two people briefed on the meeting. Cobb, who is not yet on the White House payroll, was described as attempting to instill some discipline in how the White House handles queries about the case. But Trump surprised many of his aides by speaking at length about the probe to the New York Times two days later. Cobb, who officially joins the White House team at the end of the month, declined to comment for this article.

Some note that the Constitution does not explicitly prohibit a president from pardoning himself. On the other side, experts say that by definition a pardon is something you can only give to someone else. There is also a common-law canon that prohibits individuals from serving as a judge in their own case. “For example, we would not allow a judge to preside over his or her own trial,” Kalt said.
A president can pardon an individual at any point, including before the person is charged with a crime, and the scope of a presidential pardon can be very broad. President Gerald Ford pardoned former president Richard M. Nixon preemptively for offenses he “committed or may have committed” while in office.


Devlin Barrett and Sari Horwitz contributed to this report. 

Almost one in five MPs are landlords


By Martin Williams-21 JUL 2017

Parliament has published its register of MPs’ financial interests for the first time since the election.
An analysis by FactCheck shows that 123 MPs earn extra money by renting out homes and private property. Landlord MPs account for almost a fifth of all MPs.

China: Liu Xiaobo — Walking the Path of Kang Youwei


by Wang Dan-

“Liu Xiaobo’s death also lays bare a reality we sometimes are reluctant to acknowledge: even the most moderate position, so long as it is premised on constitutional democracy, cannot be accepted by the Chinese Communist Party.”

( July 21, 2017, Hong Kong SAR, Sri Lanka Guardian) When I heard that Liu Xiaobo had died, I quickly posted the news on Facebook. So many online friends shared their condolences. One message among them struck me as particularly incisive and worthy of our consideration — this friend said that Liu Xiaobo “walked the path of Kang Youwei (康有为), and spilled his blood like Tan Sitong (谭嗣同).”
Of course, to say that Liu Xiaobo “walked the path of Kang Youwei” is not to say that Liu advocated for constitutional monarchy, but rather that his political position and basic viewpoint were actually quite moderate, just as were those of Kang Youwei in his day. Liu Xiaobo never called for revolution, to the point that he maintained “I have no enemies.” But like Tan Sitong, Liu came to a violent end: persecuted to death for the sake of advancing reform. Sometimes, history does repeat itself.
But Liu Xiaobo’s death also lays bare a reality we sometimes are reluctant to acknowledge: even the most moderate position, so long as it is premised on constitutional democracy, cannot be accepted by the Chinese Communist Party. No matter how moderate the view, no matter how much goodwill its proponents convey, to the CCP he is an “enemy of the state” and must be eliminated as soon as possible. Within and without the system, from former General Secretary Zhao Ziyang (赵紫阳) to the dissident Liu Xiaobo, it has always been thus.
What does this tell us? It tells us that all those who abide in the hope that the CCP will initiate political reform, all those who believe that the CCP will move toward democracy once a certain stage of economic development has been reached, all those who wait on the chance that Xi Jinping will turn out to be an enlightened autocrat—are all wrong, naive, even ignorant. Liu Xiaobo’s death has proven this once again.
This point has profound implications as to whether China’s future transition will bode well for its neighbors and for the world. If China’s ruling party is willing to permit moderate opposition, the transition may be smooth and peaceful; but if the CCP cannot even admit moderate opposition like Liu Xiaobo’s, then the only option is to break away from the moderates, and for hatred to accumulate in society.
If the path to reform is cut off, China will be left with opposition between state and society, and the only way out will be bloody revolution. We certainly don’t want this, but once it happens, China will inevitably plunge into chaos, and that internal chaos will impact neighboring countries and the whole world. This is the profound fear that Liu Xiaobo’s death has given us.
No doubt Liu Xiaobo’s horrific end is the result of the CCP’s total lack of humanity. But as New York University Law Professor Jerome Cohen has pointed out, Western countries are increasingly indifferent to human rights in China, so much so that they have nearly abandoned the issue. This conniving and appeasement is also to blame. Liu Xiaobo’s death will reverberate throughout the international community, emboldening the call to reckon with its policy towards the human rights of the Chinese people. The tragic death of a Nobel Peace laureate, we hope, will prompt those parties and politicians who have cozied back up to China to rethink their relationship.
In other words, Liu Xiaobo’s passing could become a turning point in China’s rise: the CCP, which continues to buy global support with the image of rapid economic growth, must bear the burden of Liu Xiaobo’s death for a long time to come. It will deal a blow to that image and an immense setback for the CCP’s arrogance. We will be glad to see this change, but the price we paid for it was Liu Xiaobo’s life. It is a tragedy of our time.
With his life, with his final breath, Liu Xiaobo gave us this truth—the CPP is the new Nazi Party. I hope this will make the world think.
Wang Dan (王丹) is a leader of the Chinese democracy movement, and was one of the most visible student leaders during the Tiananmen protests in 1989. He holds a Ph.D. in history from Harvard University and has been teaching in Taiwan until recently.

Ocean Polluted with Plastic


article_image 

By 2050 – more plastic than fish in the seas

According to a joint study conducted by Ellen MacArthur Foundation and World Economic Forum, by 2050, plastic in the oceans will outweigh fish! It predicts, at the going rate, by 2050 there will be 895 million tons of fish and 937 million tons of plastic waste in the oceans around the world.

Now that the country has brought in more stringent legislations against the use of plastic it is high time to contemplate totally moving away from synthetic plastic and looking for alternatives. Also serious is the issue of plastic disposal as humankind has dumped enough and more plastic on the earth surface and the sea.

Ocean pollution by plastic waste is becoming a grave threat to the health of the oceans and the creatures living in it. The quantity of plastic entering the ocean from waste generated on land was hitherto unknown. A team of American and Australian researchers led by Dr. Jenna R. Jambeck, Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia, USA, by linking worldwide data on solid waste, population density, and economic status, estimated the mass of land-based plastic waste entering the ocean. According to the study 275 million metric tonnes (MT) of plastic waste was generated in 192 coastal countries in 2010, with 4.8 to 12.7 (on average 8) million MT entering the ocean. An abridged version of the study is published in the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) website, under the title "Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean".

Plastics – Here, There and Everywhere

Plastics are "Here, There and Everywhere". As polymer chemist Prof. Andrew Holmes at the University of Melbourne famously said to ABC Science, "No one in their daily life within a period of 10 minutes isn't touching something that is made of plastic". But for all the benefits plastic has given us, disposing it — particularly those designed to be used only once, such as packaging, disposable cups, syringes etc. — has become a major environmental issue. That’s the volume of the problem on the land. But the irony is that good part of this plastic ultimately end up in the sea.

Plastic generally gets into the ocean from the coasts, where people live. Every minute, it is estimated that one ton of plastic makes its way into the ocean. About 80% of the plastics in the ocean come from land-based activities (as opposed to marine activities).

It is difficult to pinpoint where all that refuse originates, and researchers think that much or most of it probably comes from the nation's densely-populated coastlines. This takes into account the concept of coastal population, i.e. the population that lives within 100 km from the shore. (In Sri Lanka the coastal population stands at 14.6 million). Even from far inland, plastic trash can end up in sea by travelling thousands of kilometers into the oceans, believe researchers. But once in the ocean, currents move the plastic around. Plastic in the ocean impacts fish and other marine life. 

Dr. Chris Wilcox, marine and atmospheric scientist at Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Hobart, Tasmania told the ABC Science "About every 10 years the amount of plastic produced doubles around the world". The plastic production has increased 20-fold in the last 50 years, and it is continuing to rise further. With global production of plastic increasing exponentially, the amount of plastic finding its way into the ocean too will get much bigger, year on year.

To make matters worse, plastic is made to be strong and durable, so it can take a long time to break down. In the natural environment, the main things that break down plastics are the sunlight, oxygen and water. The rate at which plastic breaks down depends on the conditions and the type of plastic. It breaks down faster if exposed to physical abrasion and sunlight. In the marine environments, it breaks down faster in surf zones than if it is buried under sediment in an estuary. At the same time, there's a lot to do with the thickness and density of the plastic, and the presence of UV stabilizers in it. However, in general, synthetic plastic takes around 450 years to decay. On the contrary, the bio degradable plastic takes only six months to decay.

However, the degradation process of plastic poses numerous problems to the animal health and environment. According to Prof. Holmes, "The problem is that normal degradation leaves particles that can still be harmful to living beings — particularly the nanoparticles and the microparticles. That includes so-called degradable polymers used in some plastic bags, which have starch added to help them fall apart".

Plastics in the ocean

It is estimated that there are up to 51 trillion particles or 236,000 tonnes of plastics in the sea. Although that is a lot, it is nowhere near the estimated 8 billion tonnes that went into the oceans in 2010 alone. Then what intrigues the scientists is that "where has the "missing" plastic gone?".

Although plastic is widespread in the open ocean, it is particularly concentrated in the five major ocean gyres — rotating currents of water — in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans. The largest and best known of these is the Great Garbage Patch in the north Pacific — a concentrated soup of microplastics, or tiny fragments less than 5 millimeters across, which is almost the size of Europe.

There are two types of plastics that float: polyethelene, which is used to make milk jugs and plastic bags, and polypropolene, which is used for things like bottle caps, straws and dairy containers. As they travel out to sea plastics get ground down into small, hard cubes, which can be eaten by marine animals.

Plastispheres

Plastics are also home to microbes in a phenomenon dubbed the "plastisphere". These microbes may be simply using the plastic to float around the ocean, but there is some evidence they may play a role breaking down the plastic.

Plastics should become more abundant as they break down in size, but recent research found the concentration of the smallest particles, between a few microns and a few millimetres, was much lower than expected. These particles settling in the bottom of the ocean is one possibility. Scientists have found evidence of microplastics in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean.

Impact on marine animals

Animals get wrapped up in monofilament fishing line nets, plastic bags, balloons, and straps.

According to Dr Wilcox, "Getting entangled in plastic is the biggest issue faced by the marine animals". His research has estimated that between 5,000 and 15,000 sea turtles are entangled each year by derelict fishing gear washing ashore in northern Australia alone.

"Anything that is long or flexible or sheet-like is the worst."

The second biggest issue is the impact of eating plastic — it is estimated around 90 per cent of seabirds are doing so. These plastics can cause blockages of the gut or perforation of the intestines.

Ingestion of plastic can also cause toxic chemicals such as phthalates — a plasticiser that effects the hormone system — to leach into the animal. Dr Wilcox has demonstrated "These are later deposited in the animals’ fat tissues".

Immediate solution

Dr Wilcox strongly believes that "The solution to all this stuff is on land and it has to do with changing our supply chains around packaging, how we use packaging, and how we take care of packaging".

The main problem he thinks was how cheap plastic was. "If plastic had a fee or deposit associated with it we would produce and consume less."

He said one way of doing this was to introduce container deposit schemes, which had been shown to reduce the amount of drink containers in the environment by 60 per cent.

"That is a big deal, as beverage containers make up 40 per cent of the waste in the environment."

Consumers could also press retailers to use less plastic packaging, Dr Wilcox said.

"In many cases individuals have been able to drive significant local change by governments and businesses."

The way forward

According to Prof. Holmes, the world may have to move to fully biodegradable plastics, made out of plants.

But these too have drawbacks, especially related to land use. "The challenge is, is there enough arable land to produce the building blocks of plastic when we also need to produce food?"

In the meantime, he said, we must recycle anything we can.

"Ideally all plastics should be recyclable, but at present that is not the case."

Prof. Holmes said plastics that cannot be recycled — such as those used in plastic bags or expanded polystyrene foam used in coffee cups and packaging around electronic goods — must be responsibly disposed into landfill or by burning.

"The plastic waste in the oceans is disastrous for marine and bird life, and the human race has to avoid disposal of this waste in a way that enables it to enter drains, rivers, and eventually the ocean," he said.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

We cannot handle too many things together




 DR.Vickramabahu Karunaratne-2017-07-20


War is a manmade disaster that demolishes civilizations made by unknown generations. In the end what are left are not just death, injuries and destruction, but undying suspicion and distrust.
To heal, it will take time, but great leaders with humanistic ethics could do wonders. They have to stand against plunder and exploitation creating the need for communication, understanding. Faith can be created in the modern world by standing for equality,

autonomy and the right of self-determination; and then only sense of correcting the wrong done to a community is possible. In this venture, the Sri Lankan Government is harassed and beaten by a fascistic majoritist group making it faltering, despite promises to its own people, as well as to the international community. Sri Lanka's three-decade war between basically Sinhala soldiers and Tamil guerrilla military organization arose because the Sri Lankan Government failed to address the grievances of the Tamil speaking people.

It was seen as a conflict between major Sinhala nationality and the minor Tamil nationality. The Tamil clandestine army was named Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the war killed an estimated 100,000 civilians, left many more injured and displaced, and widened a seemingly unbridgeable rift between the minority Tamil nationality, and majority Sinhala nationality.
After an October 2015 pledge to the United Nations Human Rights Council to address justice and accountability, Sri Lanka's Government in 2016 embarked on a nation-wide consultation to find ways to deliver answers. The government entrusted the task to an 11-member Consultation Task Force (CTF), representing a cross-section of Sri Lanka's ethnic, regional, and religious groups. Nearly half the team, including the head of the CTF, was women. The consultation process was a complicated one. The CTF recruited representatives of local civil society, political, feminist, healthcare and religious leaders as Zonal Task Force members (ZTF), who could conduct consultations on the ground across the various districts and provinces. These findings were accepted as valuable to indicate how human rights and social-economic rights should be improved in a new Constitution.

A fair degree of commitment

However, the pressing need was to propose a new Constitution sans executive presidency, but with a substantial devolution giving power over land and police to the provincial councils. This was undertaken by the investigation carried out by the Lal Wijenaike Committee. People participated with many valuable proposals. On this basis under the leadership of the Prime Minister, discussions are continuing in order to bring a proposal for a new Constitution; to be debated in the Constitutional Council. Hence it is incorrect to say that Sri Lankan Government has let the important initiative of the CTF to languish. Officials traveling abroad boast about the consultation process and herald it as a signal of the government's determination to abide by the Human Rights Council resolution.
However, it has to come behind the effort to resolve the Tamil national problem and the problem of Executive President. Government report by CTF is not banished into silence. Meanwhile, many task force members, both national and zonal, are absorbed in the struggle against fascistic Mahinda group. While many joined the effort with a fair degree of commitment, they are aware that the Sri Lankan State had undertaken many commissions of inquiry which in the end led to no redress so far.

A CTF member described both the exhilaration of the process and the attendant disappointment: "The consultations gave way to an amazing non-patronizing community of support...the best thing about the experience is that people had ideas. But by January 2017, I was wondering: "What the hell?" ZTF members, particularly community leaders who have spent years building relationships of trust, feel they are bearing the brunt of public rage over the lack of action. They feel exposed, and are confronted daily by their communities, yet another failed promise, but this time by trusted local leaders. "They are very angry with us, people have lost their faith, even with me," one ZTF member told Human Rights Watch. "And now, I also have lost faith."

This disappointment is due to misunderstanding the political crisis. Sri Lankan Government is struggling against an internal enemy fed by fascistic ideas. There are sabotage actions taking place throughout the country. Some are obvious some are very subtle.

Facing this menace Yahapalanaya is struggling to satisfy UN human rights conditions. The Government of Sri Lanka has publicly acknowledged the findings of the consultation report and ensures that its recommendations are appropriately implemented through robust justice mechanisms. It should be remembered that we cannot handle too many things together.

No need of divisive constitution: Sampanthan



Friday, July 21, 2017
Opposition Leader R Sampanthan yesterday said they did not want a Constitution that would create divisions in the country.
He said they need a Constitution that was aimed at addressing the root cause of the national question and would bring a resolution to the same.
The Opposition Leader made these remarks when he called on visiting Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop at the residence of Australian High Commissioner in Colombo yesterday.
Sampanthan said he was confident that if the United National Party and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party members in the government work together, formulating the new Constitution can be fulfilled.
“We don’t want a Constitution that divides the country, but a Constitution that will address the root causes of the national question and eventually be a resolution to the same, and we are committed to working on these lines to frame a new Constitution,” he said
Sampanthan briefed the visiting Foreign Minister on the current situation of the Constitutional making process and highlighted that the UNP and the SLFP must work together at this crucial time to overcome barriers and obstacles that are threat to the process.
“The country never had a Constitution based on national consensus. This is an opportunity to frame a Constitution based on national consensus which should not be missed,” Sampanthan said.
He cautioned that if these efforts fail, there will be consequences which will have an adverse impact on the country.
TNA spokesman and parliamentarian M. A. Sumanthiran was present 

Weliamuna’s frank take on the state of the Judiciary

Untitled-1Thursday, 20 July 2017

logoJ.C. Weliamuna, President’s Counsel, Eisenhower Fellow, former Member of the Transparency International Global Board, and Constitutional Law practitioner in Supreme Court for over 28 years, in an interview with the Daily FT shares a frank inside view into the status of the Judicial organ of the State today. Following

are excerpts:
Q: How do you measure the Judiciary after 8 January 2015?

A: Major positive changes took place, taking the Judiciary out of the clutches of the politicians. Despite political interference under the last regime, many judges in all courts acted independently but maybe not all. External interference appears to have vanished. All judges are now at liberty to give decisions without external interference. Analysis of judgements and orders given in politically sensitive cases will bear testimony to it. No doubt there are areas to improve without which the Judiciary cannot deliver, most of which are structural.

A ragdoll that cannot be ‘stitched together’ anymore

  • The dilapidated governing model put together on a very opportunist political need carries with it an endemic conflict of political party interests. 
  • Post-election anti-corruption crusade is fizzling off with heavy corruption in Yahapalanaya and accommodating the corrupt, making Rajapaksa a smaller fry.
  • SLFP compelled to decide the role of Rajapaksa. Both the Maithri bloc and the business community still need Rajapaksa and his vote bloc in forming Governments.
2017-07-21
Bound by their MoU, they are not formally separated yet. But they may have to. Now, the indications are, PM Wickremesinghe is out to break the jinx, on his string of Presidential Election defeats. 

Perhaps he knows his most cherished project of having the Executive Presidency abolished that was outsourced to self-appointed Colombo Civil Society leaders, is not going to work. UNP is told to begin a fast track, high profile image building campaign of the leader. Meanwhile for now, Wickremesinghe wants the “Unity” Government to continue.

President Sirisena, is being lobbied and advised to revisit his cohabitation with the UNP, with more pressure building up within his own SLFP bloc against cohabiting in Government. With his outburst over hindering investigations on alleged mega Rajapaksa corruption, he seems to be buying time to see if Rajapaksa can be erased from the political map. 

He has thus told his SLFP Parliamentarians to have the safety-catch on in their guns till end December, when something new could happen. 

Speaking at a business forum thereafter, he had said a unique new party was in the offing. He is probably thinking of an SLFP without Rajapaksas.

Meanwhile, the MoU signed between the two parties in this ‘Unity’ Government comes to an end in September. Will the two leaders want the MoU renewed for the next two years?

To have lived together in a Government for almost two years (Counting from August 2015 elections), with no clear political understanding and a mission, by itself is a miracle. 

That ‘miracle’ came about on a sheer opportunistic understanding that for them meant, everything else mattered little if holding onto power was possible. Why then cannot this ‘unity’ continue in Government on the same opportunist understanding?

This dilapidated Governing model put together on a very opportunist political need, carries with it an endemic conflict of political party interests. 

It is, thus a ‘Government of indecision’ and is inefficient too. It has therefore failed in delivering on all and everything it promised at both the Presidential and Parliamentary elections held within nine months.

It has failed miserably from day one in seeking a different path for development to that of Rajapaksa in direction, content and quality. 

PM Wickremesinghe’s idea -of replicating the ‘Port City’ as Megapolis in the Western Province- remains a website story- even after 18 months. In less than one year, the “Yahapalana” economics was everything Rajapaksa- from the Colombo Port City, the Mattala International Airport to the Hambantota Port and economically dependent on China no less.

In a heavily liberated and a wholly corrupt market economy, this Government too has to live with the same business community, who during Rajapaksa era lived with State patronage. 

With that, more and more names and faces of the Rajapaksa era keep emerging in high posts in the bureaucracy and in political circles glued to the Government high command. 

The most recent was the appointment of Bogollagama as Governor, Eastern Province.
Thus all those anti-corruption forums and platforms that mushroomed immediately after elections have either been muffled or have moved to other funding sources. 

In short, the post elections anti-corruption crusade is fizzling off with heavy corruption in “Yahapalanaya” and accommodating the corrupt, making Rajapaksa a smaller fry.

So is their track record on peace and reconciliation. Nothing different has gone North-East other than what the Rajapaksas sent. Or rather, what is still being done in the North-East is not what the people are eager to have. 

President Sirisena is openly against the Government’s commitment given to the UNHRC on war crime probes with PM Wickremesinghe endorsing same. The “Yahapalana” Government’s farce over peace and reconciliation is being exposed with mothers and other relatives of persons missing due to enforced disappearances continuing their agitation for almost 150 days, even without the ITAK leadership around.

Reconciliation this Government talks of is not what Tamil people understand as ‘reconciliation’. UNP MP as Justice Minister rudely refusing to accept UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Counter-Terrorism Emmerson’s explanations says it all in one shameful episode.

Far worse is the fate of Muslim people, especially in majority Sinhala South. The “Yahapalana” Government is certainly promoting extreme Sinhala groups including BBS and the Ravana Balaya.
The Justice Minister, who is also the Minister of Buddha Sasana, a strange combination of portfolios for a “Yahapalana” Government was very conspicuous in patronising these extremist groups.
So, is the Minister of Megapolis and Urban Development who still is a Hela Urumaya leader standing for anti-Muslim, Sinhala Buddhist extremism. The Muslim community that voted “Yahapalanaya” en bloc is now kept guessing “how safe?”
That defines the emerging differences in the “Unity” Government with President Sirisena’s resentful manipulations turning it into a ragdoll that cannot be stitched together once again.

Within those overtly Sinhala political assertions, the Police have started intimidating Tamil media while a racist Sinhala writer gains unrestricted freedom to name and accuse Tamil media stations as
he pleases. 

That perhaps is “reconciliation” this Government is comfortable with and the ITAK leadership blind to reality, still believe they can manage Constitutional reforms in re-addressing Tamil grievances. All round, the “Yahapalana” Unity Government has failed so badly, even Rajapaksa goes public now, labelling this Government “corrupt, repressive and anti people”. 

He is once again the preferred Sinhala leader, whose political positions are borrowed and re iterated even by the Asgiriya and Malwatte Prelates. 

This Sinhala build up against the “Yahapalana” Unity Government is what now irks its two partners and disturbs their opportunist co-habitation.

It’s the Maithri bloc in the SLFP that has felt the heat most. For them, ‘Rajapaksa’ is a decisive factor with the large majority of SLFP voters still accepting Rajapaksa as their SLFP leader. All elected SLFP members in this Parliament are there, elected on Rajapaksa’s campaigning and not President Sirisena’s. 

In fact, President Sirisena used his powers to ridicule and belittle Rajapaksa, who led the SLFP campaign against the UNP and collected 42.4 per cent for the SLFP led UPFA as against UNP’s 45.6 per cent. Therefore, it is not surprising that SLFP loyalties remain with Rajapaksa and not with President Sirisena. Can President Sirisena therefore push for an anti-Rajapaksa agenda, while claiming to lead the SLFP? 

This in fact is the conflict. President Sirisena’s SLFP bloc in the Government cannot go to their electorates as anti-Rajapaksa men, when they have not delivered anything to the people, who did not vote them to be part of a UNP Government.

Worse is their plight when they cannot sell to their rural voter, what Wickremesinghe tries to sell to the urban middle class. 

President Sirisena’s cry to have the Rajapaksas investigated to a finish, perhaps a formula designed by his mentor Kumaratunga, therefore cannot win the race for him. There is growing frustration and anger out there in the electorate.

Nor would this corrupt free-market allow the corrupt in the UNP to finish off the Rajapaksa factor. The business community will have to keep their options open, while living with the Government. In the absence of Rajapaksa, where will they find their alternative with a Government that is seen tottering and ineffective in public life?

In Sri Lanka, the Sinhala majority do not pin their faith on, nor do they experiment with, a “third force”. To be an alternative, a third force will have to leave the Sinhala bias of the two main parties.  It is written in post-independence history, the SLFP emerged as the alternative to the UNP pushing out the then main Opposition LSSP, by proving they are a Sinhala party for the Sinhala voter. The formation of the SLFP thus gave the Sinhala majority the advantage of keeping a “Sinhala” option in changing Governments.

All efforts thereafter in forging a new alternative have failed. Having failed to elbow out the SLFP, the two main  Leftist parties tagged behind the SLFP with breakups and splintering on the way.
The popular breakup in the SLFP that led to the formation of the SLMP with Vijaya and Chandrika Kumaratunga, could not make any serious dent on mainstream politics. 

Not because its charismatic leader Vijaya Kumaratunga was assassinated, but because it was not seen as a “Sinhala” party. The rest is history with Chandrika Kumaratunga re-entering the SLFP on a “mother’s sympathy”.

Thrown out of the party by President Premadasa, the two new leaders groomed by President Jayewardene forming their own DUNF, also was not accepted as an alternative in the mainstream. After the assassination of Lalith Athulathmudali, the DUNF folded up with Gamini Dissanayake trekking back to the UNP once again.

The new political party, Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna launched by the Rajapaksa loyalists is not projected as an alternative in politics. It is retained as a fall back option for those who may not find accommodation in the SLFP, if the crisis within it now, ends up with serious expulsions.  Rajapaksa thus remains in the SLFP and says nothing about leaving it. Nor is he expelled even after his May Day rally that defied all party decisions.

As much as the SLFP bloc with President Maithri wants Rajapaksa for his vote bloc, the business community needs him too as their alternative, if and when they have to choose one.  The SLFP will thus be compelled to decide the role of Rajapaksa for the future. In other words, both the SLFP Maithri bloc and the business community still need Rajapaksa and his vote bloc in forming Governments.  That defines the emerging differences in the “Unity” Government with President Sirisena’s resentful manipulations turning it into a ragdoll that cannot be stitched together once again.

Sri Lanka: President Accusing media of criticizing government


by Latheef Farook-
( July 20, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Accusing the media of criticizing the government, President Maithripala Sirisena stated recently that media personnel had forgotten the sufferings they underwent during Rajapaksa regime. He claimed that it was his government that freed the media and had given the freedom now enjoyed.
Of course, it is common knowledge that there are plenty of Rajapaksa stooges all over including in the media . The talk has been that there are plenty of Rajapaksa mercenaries, stooges and ghost writers exploiting every possible opportunity to discredit the government.
However, the media in general is telling home truths for which the government is fully responsible. Media today is reflecting the mood of the people who voted for the government in the hope they would bring to book all those who brought the country to the misery.

Almost every organization is mismanaged and the island today is one of the most mismanaged countries in the world despite all its natural blessings but turning more disastrous than ever heard of before.

People and the media which supported the government alike remain deeply disappointed with the government’s dismal failure to fulfil its pledges to prosecute those responsible for high profile fraud, corruption, crimes, murders, looting of nation’s wealth and the list continues. If we are to go by reports in the media, the so-called patriots only developed themselves under the guise of developing the country.
These include Hambantota port, Mattala airport, stadium, conference hall, Colombo port and the so called financial city projects which virtually sold out the country to foreigners. These projects increased the country’s debts beyond its financial capacity to repay. Country was financially mortgaged to foreign countries. This is one among many of the reasons why the Rajapaksa government was thrown out.
Now what has been going on under the present government has caused deep disappointment as they do not want the collapse of the government. Now the question is why is the new government which came to power on the slogan of good governance not taking firm action to deal with all those who ruined this country?
Most responsible media personnel who do not want the return of Rajapaksa government point out that the media is not trying to topple the government. Instead highlighting the government’s failure to ensure that even at this late stage the government wakes up, fulfil its pledges and avert any potential disaster which could bring unpredictable consequences.
Unfortunately, the current policy of doing nothing has resulted in people losing confidence in the ability of the government to deliver on their pledges to the nation. This means the government, willingly or unwillingly, playing into the hands of those who are suspected of plotting and conspiring to topple it. This is what the media does not want and thus highlighting burning issues in the hope that the government would wake up to the realities.
The often-raised question in almost every social gatherings and functions is that why can’t the government arrest the rogues, thieves, frauds and looters who flourished under Rajapaksa government. Why don’t the government bring to book those who committed crimes such as the suspected killing of rugger player Wasim Tajudeen and those from the media, whose soul would continue to haunt not only those in the previous government but those in the preent government too.
To cite an example time and again, the media raise questions about the wisdom behind government approving millions of rupees to import cars for parliamentarians at a time when the almost bankrupt country’s economy is run by International Monetary Fund with foreign debts exceeding $ 60 billion, almost 83% of the GDP, while the people are being subjected to immense problems and hardships in their day to day lives.
People are fed up of empty slogans such as turning Colombo into a financial center between Singapore and Dubai. Sri Lanka was more than a financial center in the early 1950 when late Singapore prime minister Lee Kwan Yew said that he would make Singapore a Sri Lanka and Dubai then was an unknown desert strip used for drying fish.
Almost every organization is mismanaged and the island today is one of the most mismanaged countries in the world despite all its natural blessings but turning more disastrous than ever heard of before.
They point out the need to sort out problems such as the dispute between doctors and the government over SAITAM issue. This issue coupled with repeated students protests caused immense hardships to people. These are issues which need to be sorted as early as possible. However, that was not done. Instead the government leaders are travelling worldwide signing bilateral agreements which so far failed to bring any fruitful results including foreign investments. Yet up to date neither the president nor the prime minister thought it fit to visit to Gulf states which provides employment to around a million Sri Lankans whose annual remittances is more than seven billion dollars helping to sustain the economy from collapse.
There was a time when decent and responsible elements in the bureaucracy kept the corrupt politicians in check. However, in the recent past especially during the Rajapaksa regime politicians and large section of the bureaucracy joined hands to plunder the country and ruin several vital establishments.
For example, during Rajapaksa regime there were reports of politicians and bureaucracy jointly looting around $ 3.5 billion tsunami aid while tsunami victims continue to live even today in temporary shelters.
The situation is such Is that seven decades after the independence the country couldn’t find a solution to dump its waste while an airline is almost grounded due to mismanagement.
The government came with a pledge to stop the hate crimes and bring about reconciliation within divided communities. However, when racist thugs began attacking mosques and Muslim owned businesses the government remained indifferent with many accusing it of giving a free hand.
This is the reason why the media and the people alike are critical of the government and it is time for the government to wake up from slumber and save the country and save the government itself.