Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, July 7, 2017

School Athletic Association completely irresponsible

017-07-07
There were no proper safety measures that had been taken in the Sir John Tarbet Athletics Championship concluded yesterday.
The Sri Lanka School Athletic Association (SLSAA) along with Ceylon Biscuits Limited organized the championship but this year there was no ambulance kept stand by at the venue. Ambulances being kept at the site is a must in any sporting event and Sri Lanka has been facing many sad situations of athletes dying as a result of this lapse.
When athletes were injured during the race there was no one to help them until their parents come in to help them. This was a pathetic occurrence at this year's championship. These incidents kept on repeating and so many incidents took place during the three days of the championship and several schools made official complaints to the SLSAA but it seems like they don't care or consider their complains.
Organizers should be more concerned on the children rather than their benefits and questions were raised as to what was happening to the funds they get from the main sponsors. School children were seen eating their meals where sewerage was flowing slightly away from where they were. Had the funds been properly utilized there would not be questions asked.
Ceylon Biscuits is a large company and these children they support are their future customers, sadly the company authorities who were involved seemed to have forgotten the fact that this was no way to treat the future citizens.

Israel furious as UNESCO rebuffs its claim to Hebron


Israel tries to use Jewish reverence the Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron as a pretext to claim sovereignty over the occupied West Bank city.Najeh HashlamounAPA images

Charlotte Silver- 7 July 2017

Israel has reacted with rage after the United Nations cultural organization UNESCO passed two resolutions recognizing Hebron’s Old City and the Ibrahimi mosque, in the occupied West Bank, as endangered Palestinian heritage sites.

Twelve states on the World Heritage Committee voted in favor of the resolutions and three voted against. Six abstained.

The vote means that Hebron’s Old City and the Ibrahimi mosque, the place where an American Jewish settler massacred 29 Palestinians in 1994, will be added as Palestinian World Heritage sites on UNESCO’s register.

Both sites are also now considered endangered, which means the UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee will convene every year to evaluate their status.

Hebron’s Old City is home to about 800 Israeli settlers, who move about freely under army protection, while thousands of Palestinians are subjected to harsh military rule, roadblocks and checkpoints.

Mimicking Trump

Israel, backed by the United States, had tried to rally enough member states to block the resolutions.
But after their effort failed, Israeli leaders reasserted Israel’s claim to the occupied West Bank.
Apparently mimicking the style of President Donald Trump, the spokesperson for Israel’s foreign ministry tweeted an attack on UNESCO: “This irrelevant organization promotes FAKE HISTORY.”

The  people's glorious history in  started in .No @UNESCO lies and FAKE HISTORY can change that. Truth is eternal🇮🇱🇮🇱

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who called the decision “surreal,”
immediately announced Israel would withhold another $1 million of membership dues to the United Nations, saying the funds would be used to establish a museum of Jewish heritage in Kiryat Arba, the colony where Baruch Goldstein, the settler who carried out the 1994 mosque massacre, lived.

“This time they decided that the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron is a Palestinian site, meaning not Jewish, and that it’s in danger,” Netanyahu said. He went on to list the names of biblical figures that Jews believe are buried there.

The Tomb of the Patriarchs is the name used by Israel for the Ibrahimi mosque.

Netanyahu – as Israeli officials always do – conflated Judaism with Israeli control. There is of course no contradiction between a site being Palestinian, on the one hand, and being revered by Muslims, Christians or Jews, on the other.

After the vote, Elias Sanbar, the Palestinian Authority’s representative at UNESCO, said that the resolution simply acknowledges that the mosque is in Palestinian territory.

“Palestine has not inscribed a religion on the World Heritage List,” Sanbar said. “Religion cannot be inscribed on such a list. It can only be something that can be felt, something we can fight for.”

Sanbar acknowledged that Palestine encompasses lands “which are sacred to all three monotheistic religions.”

Denying Palestinian existence

Following the vote, a representative of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, an Israel lobby group based in Los Angeles, claimed that since Palestine was admitted into UNESCO in 2011, the Palestinians have been using “heritage as war by other means.”

In fact it has been Israel that has relentlessly tried to use Jewish reverence for various sites in the occupied West Bank, especially in Jerusalem, as a pretext to try to assert Israeli sovereignty over them.

Predictably, Israeli officials have tried to spin the international rebuff of their transparent efforts to assert sovereignty over occupied territory as discrimination.

Defense minister Avigdor Lieberman called the UNESCO vote “anti-Semitic.”

“No decision by this irrelevant organization will undermine our historic right over the Tomb of the Patriarchs, or our right over the country,” Lieberman added, giving as clear an indication as possible that Israel does not recognize Palestinian existence, let alone self-determination in the West Bank or anywhere else in historic Palestine.

Lieberman urged the United States to help ensure that UNESCO is “defunded.”

Lies and distortions

The Palestinian Authority foreign minister Riad Malkicalled the vote a diplomatic victory.

“Despite a frantic Israeli campaign spreading lies and distorting the facts about the Palestinian rights, the world has recognized our right to register Hebron and the Ibrahimi mosque under Palestinian sovereignty,” Malki stated.

Israel and the United States, which has openly denounced the resolution, had called for the vote to be secret, to allow member states to vote “without paying a political price,” according to Haaretz.

But UNESCO only allowed the vote to be “partially secret,” meaning member states were not required to reveal how the voted, but the vote did not take place behind a screen.

The vote occurred during the annual World Heritage Committee meeting that is currently taking place in Krakow, Poland.

Earlier this week, the committee approved a resolution reaffirming that Israel occupies East Jerusalem and calls its annexation of the city “null and void.”

That resolution also reaffirms the importance of Jerusalem’s Old City to all three monotheistic faiths.

Clashes near South Sudan rebel stronghold, aid workers evacuated

FILE PHOTO: Rebel fighters hold up their rifles as they walk in front of a bushfire in a rebel-controlled territory in Upper Nile State, South Sudan February 13, 2014. REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Rebel fighters hold up their rifles as they walk in front of a bushfire in a rebel-controlled territory in Upper Nile State, South Sudan February 13, 2014. REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic/File Photo

Fri Jul 7, 2017

South Sudan's rebels said a government offensive was pushing toward their main stronghold in the northeast on Friday, as the United Nations announced at least 25 aid workers had been evacuated from the town amid escalating clashes.

There were growing fears for civilians caught up in fighting, the U.N.'s Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said.

The loss of Pagak in the northeastern Upper Nile region would be a major blow to the cash-strapped rebels, whose leader Riek Machar is being held under house arrest in South Africa.

Pagak has been the main rebel base since 2014. It is located deep in the heartland of the Nuer people, pressed against the Ethiopian border.

South Sudan's civil war began in December 2013, when President Salva Kiir, an ethnic Dinka, fired his deputy, Machar, a Nuer. Since then, the conflict has displaced a quarter of the 12 million-strong population and plunged parts of the country into famine briefly earlier this year.

The U.N. has said the ethnic violence in the oil-rich nation could set the stage for genocide. Rights groups say soldiers and allied militias have raped, tortured and killed civilians. The rebels have also been accused of major human rights violations.

"The government launched an attack towards Pagak for about a week now," rebel spokesman Lam Paul Gabriel told Reuters via Whatsapp message.

Gabriel said "many" civilians lost their lives while others fled to swamps or crossed to Ethiopia.
But a military spokesman denied there was any fighting because the government was observing a unilateral ceasefire.

"There is nothing like that so far, we had a briefing this morning and there is no fighting at Pagak,"
said Colonel Santo Domic Chol. "Pagak is the headquarters of the IO (rebels) where they have their ammunition and everything and of course it is not easy for SPLA (the military) to access such the area unless it had gone for major operations."

The military is known as the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) and the rebels as the Sudan People's Liberation Army-In Opposition (SPLA-IO).

At least 25 aid workers were evacuated from Pagak on Thursday and Friday, and fighting in the nearby Mathiang area forced thousands of civilians to flee, the U.N.'s Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said in a statement.

OCHA said the fighting began last week.

"Humanitarians are deeply concerned regarding the plight of civilians in areas affected by the clashes," the statement read.

An internationally-backed peace deal between Kiir and Machar collapsed last year. Since then, the government has made steady gains across the Upper Nile region and the rebels have shifted their focus to the country's south and taken control of areas there.

(Editing by Andrew Heavens)
Thousands protest for independence in south Yemen

Demonstrators chanted their support for the South Transitional Council, which is not recognised by Hadi's government


Supporters of the Transitional Southern Council rally in Aden for secession of south Yemen on 7 July (Reuters)

Friday 7 July 2017
Thousands of Yemenis demanding secession rallied in the streets of Aden on Friday, waving the flag of the formerly independent south in their third protest since May.
Protesters marched through central Aden, Yemen's second city and home to the war-ravaged country's government.
They chanted their support for the South Transitional Council and demanded the independence of south Yemen, which was an independent state until 1990 when it was unified with north Yemen.
The South Transition Council, an autonomous body aimed at overseeing self-governance among southern provinces, was declared in May and is not recognised by the government of President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi.
The 26-member council includes the governors of five southern provinces and two cabinet ministers.
Aden serves as a temporary base for the Hadi government, as the capital Sanaa has been held by Huthi rebels since September 2014.
Hadi is himself based in Riyadh, having fled Aden in March 2015 as the Shia rebels closed in on his refuge. 
In May, tens of thousands of Yemenis protested in Aden against Hadi's sacking of the provincial governor and a cabinet minister widely praised for helping drive Iran-aligned Houthis from the city in 2015.
The two men sacked, Aden provincial governor Aydaroos al-Zubaidi and cabinet member Hani bin Brek, are both seen as supporting separatism for southern Yemen, while Hadi is determined to tighten his grip over a unified country.
Zubaidi was one of the leaders of the Southern Resistance that helped expel the Houthis from his city.
Zubaidi and Brek are also seen as close to the UAE, a powerful regional military player involved in a Saudi-led campaign that has waged war on Yemen.
More than 8,000 people have been killed in the past two years and tens of thousands wounded in the war in Yemen, according to the World Health Organization.
Diplomats and some analysts say Hadi is uncomfortable that among the forces trained and supported by the UAE are some pro-secessionist fighters.

Trump-Putin meeting dominates G20 as Russia denies interfering in US election

The drama, lengthy duration and unpredictability of the two presidents’ meeting dominated the day, as Putin reportedly denied any involvement

 Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shake hands during a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Hamburg on Friday. Photograph: TASS / Barcroft Images

 and  in Hamburg-Friday 7 July 2017

Donald Trump began his highly anticipated first meeting with Vladimir Putinsince his election with a direct warning to stop interfering in American elections, the US secretary of state said on Friday.
Reports that Russia intervened to tip the election in Trump’s favour have dogged the US president since last year. But when the two men met on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Hamburg, Putin denied any involvement, the US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, told reporters.

The meeting came against a backdrop of intense diplomacy on topics ranging from Syria, North Korea, climate change and trade wars – all conducted while Hamburg grappled with violent street protests.

The day was dominated, however, by the sheer drama, unpredictability and unexpected duration of an encounter that lasted two hours and 16 minutes – far longer than expected.

Tillerson said that halfway through the meeting, Melania Trump entered the room to remind her husband of his schedule, but the meeting went on for another hour.

The two leaders gingerly attempted to open a new chapter of bilateral relations with the announcement of a joint approach in Syria – but the meeting was overshadowed by questions over Russia’s efforts to sway the 2016 election in Trump’s favour.

US Democrats had demanded Trump discuss Russian cyber interference with Putin.
Tillerson said the two men had “a very robust and lengthy exchange on the subject” and said that the US was demanding a future commitment from Russiathat it would not interfere in American democracy.

“The president pressed President Putin on more than one occasion regarding Russian involvement. President Putin denied such involvement, as I think he has in the past,” Tillerson said.

Russia’s foreign minister told reporters that Trump had accepted Putin’s denial of involvement. “President Trump said that he had heard the clear statements from President Putin about this being untrue, that the Russian leadership did not interfere in the election, and that he accepts these statements,” said Sergey Lavrov.

Tillerson also suggested that the two sides might never come to a resolution – suggesting that both leaders hoped to put the matter behind them.

The secretary of state said the meeting was “rightly focused on how do we move forward from something that may be an intractable disagreement at this point”.

Apart from the two presidents, the only other people present were Tillerson, Lavrov and two interpreters. “There was a very clear positive chemistry between the two,” Tillerson said. “There was not a lot of relitigating things from the past.”

Trump’s comments to Putin marked a shift: as recently as Thursday, the US president again challenged the conclusion of the US intelligence community, saying that “nobody really knows” who was behind efforts to influence the election result.

 A fire burns amid anti-G20 protests on Friday in Hamburg, Germany. Photograph: Alexander Koerner/Getty Images

But his efforts to move past the issue did not satisfy political opponents at home.

Adrienne Watson, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, said: “Trump played into Putin’s hand yet again by suggesting that we should just move on from last year’s election hacks. After Trump has denied that Russia was behind the hacks for nearly a year, it is not surprising that Putin took the same position today.

Watson said the US president had spent months “going out of his way to give cover” to Putin. “Trump is not just giving Putin a pass on last year’s attack on our democracy, but inviting him to do it again,” she said.

The focus on the Trump-Putin meeting angered the host country, Germany, which had been preparing its own elaborate agenda for the G20 for over a year.

The day saw scraps between the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, and Trump over climate change, while the EU threatened immediate retaliatory sanctions against the US if it went ahead with plans to slap tariffs on steel imports.

Police forces around Germany dispatched reinforcements to help 15,000 officers already deployed to Hamburg for the summit as violence escalated. A police spokesman said that a group of about 60 masked protesters attacked three police vehicles with molotov cocktails, and that a flare fired at a police helicopter only narrowly missed its target.

Emmanuel Macron, the French president, warned that the rise of nationalism could lead to war, and offered his US counterpart a lesson on trade in a tense meeting, sources have revealed.

After Trump had described his “America first” approach to trade , Macron reportedly took out his mobile phone in order to illustrate his thoughts on the issue.

The French president argued that if his phone was made in the US, that would amount to a trade deficit in France, but the fact that America had imported parts to build the device from China would give it a deficit elsewhere.

A diplomatic source said Macron’s aim during the working lunch was to stress that trade was not simply a two-way street.

Although the drama of the confrontation over Putin’s interference in the US elections was striking, an announcement about a joint approach on Syria – starting with a ceasefire in the south-west of the country – may have greater long-term significance.

Innumerable ceasefires have been announced and broken down in Syria before, but the latest announcement may be seen as a precursor to a national ceasefire and even the US endorsement of a joint Russian-Turkish plan for “de-escalation zones” in the areas of greatest conflict between the Assad regime and the rebels.

The US has been increasingly explicit that it no longer expects that Assad must stand aside as part of a political settlement, but there is no still agreement on the future political shape of Syria if and when Islamic State is defeated. The ceasefire could create the space for a discussion about Syria’s future, including Putin’s long-sought joint approach to defeating extremist rebel groups.

The new south-west ceasefire in Syria, endorsed by Jordan and Israel, will start on Sunday and is indefinite.

US officials said the possible start of a fruitful Trump-Putin relationship, founded on a joint solution in Syria, did not mean longstanding tensions had evaporated over a range of other critical issues such as North Korea, protectionism, cybersecurity and Ukraine.

Putin urged Trump to calm his rhetoric over North Korea’s apparent firing of an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching US soil.

Putin said the “North Korean nuclear program is a very acute problem. We must not lose our self-command; we need to act pragmatically and very carefully.” But Tillerson said that if it a peaceful pressure campaign did not work, there were few options left.

Forming an alliance with the new South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, Putin argued the US needed to keep its focus on further sanctions and dialogue, rather than military measures.

China is reluctant to see sanctions extended to the point where energy supplies to North Korea are cut off, a move that could spark the mass movement of refugees across its border.

Tillerson described US progress on sanctions alongside China as uneven. He said the Chinese took action and then paused.

Initial briefings suggested that Trump ceded little ground to Putin on the so-called frozen conflict in Ukraine, insisting economic sanctions would continue until Russia did more to comply with the Minsk accords. Putin has countered that the depth of sanctions mean they are turning into a form of undisclosed protectionism by the US.
But in a move welcomed by the Ukrainian government, Trump has appointed an experienced special envoy, a move that will be seen to show the administration is raising its interest in the country’s plight.

Donald Trump Has Made America a Back-Row Kid

Donald Trump Has Made America a Back-Row Kid


No automatic alt text available.BY DEREK CHOLLETJULIE SMITH-JULY 7, 2017 

“How will America help fix this?” During our time in the Obama administration, this was a common refrain, one we heard over and over from our foreign counterparts about global problems. They saw the United States as the leader on a broad range of issues — from combating terrorism to combating climate change — not just because of its tremendous economic and military strength (though that certainly helped). They believed in American “soft power” — the ability to set the agenda, bring others to the table, draw up a game plan, and take the lead in implementing that plan. In a world of unrelenting challenges, this expectation can be exhausting, and it can often seem like a burden. But the fact that so many countries look to the United States to provide the answers should be viewed as a blessing — it is what makes America exceptional.

Many things contribute to America’s global influence: its history of forming global coalitions, its government policies that set the tone, its “can-do” spirit, the power of U.S. example on issues like human rights, and, yes, its raw military and economic might. But America’s sway in the world also hinges on the culture of U.S. foreign policy that is propagated — and embodied — by the sitting president.

Most presidents understand this intuitively. “A platoon leader doesn’t get his platoon to go that way by getting up and saying, ‘I am smarter, I am bigger, I am stronger, I am the leader,’” President Dwight Eisenhower said in 1954. “He gets men to go with him because they want to do it for him, because they believe in him.”

For decades, American presidents of both parties have sought to enhance this pull of attraction by the policies they promote as well as how they act in office. They have understood that this is much more than being charitable or well liked. It is about commanding respect, maintaining other countries’ faith in U.S. institutions and values, and inspiring others to take action. It is also about coming to the table with ideas and getting things done.

This is never easy. Whether Republican or Democrat, presidents often struggle with getting others to believe in them and follow along. President George W. Bush was often derided as a callow cowboy, and President Barack Obama was seen as too aloof. Yet each was able to operate within the broad consensus that has embodied U.S. foreign policy for decades. But President Donald Trump is something altogether different. Because he prides himself on breaking with tradition and doing things his own way, he risks tearing down the culture of U.S. foreign policy. This is one of the reasons many Republican national security professionals are uncomfortable working for him.

As a president, Trump leads by insult, intimidation, bluster, and boast. His policies are deeply troubling in many areas, whether it is pulling out of international agreements, threatening trade wars, or slashing the budget for diplomacy or development. Though some of his chief advisors—the so-called adults like Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson — are more technocrats than ideologues, they are working on many issues (such as Taiwan, Middle East peace, and NATO) to bring Trump’s policies into the mainstream. But what they can’t fix is Trump’s leadership style and the cultural shift it represents — here in the United States as well as abroad.

For America’s global partners, especially in Europe, Trump is wholly different from any U.S. president they have encountered. He is instinctually more autocratic than democratic, so it’s not surprising that he’s more at ease with monarchs and autocrats, as they are with him. Massive gilded palaces, family courtiers, oligarchic friends, and rule by decree make up the environment in which he is more comfortable, and fawning crowds and a pliant press are what’s desirable. Trump’s behavior is less confounding if he’s seen not as a leader who aims to succeed in a democratic system of government and steer the free world, but as someone who is more familiar with the norms of autocracy. By considering him in the mold of strongman — more Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe than U.S. President James Madison — his choices make more sense.

The result is a profound shift in the culture of U.S. foreign-policy leadership, in which traditional democratic allies see the president not as a problem-solver but more as a challenge to be managed or worked around. At the same time, U.S. foreign policy under Trump is more recognizable to illiberal leaders in China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. It’s no wonder that they are confident in improved relations, because in Trump they see someone like themselves.

Irrespective of how they view the Trump presidency, many foreign leaders are wondering if he will get things done.
When all eyes turn to him at the next international summit or emergency session in the wake of some tragedy, will he be able to restore faith in America’s capacity to lead and compel others to follow?
When all eyes turn to him at the next international summit or emergency session in the wake of some tragedy, will he be able to restore faith in America’s capacity to lead and compel others to follow? Trump certainly thinks so. Yet based on how few of his campaign promises he’s delivered on in the first six months of his presidency (no Muslim ban, no health care bill, no tax reform, no moving of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem), many have their doubts.

To be sure, the United States remains too powerful to ignore, and there will still be many policies where close cooperation will thrive. But as leaders grapple with the reality of Trump, they expect a U.S. president who will be more contentious and distracted while less reliable and predictable. (That’s why leaders in Germany and Canada are openly questioning whether the United States still has their back, and why Asian partners are trying to revive the Trans-Pacific Partnership without the United States.) Worse, instead of being admired, Trump is becoming a laughingstock, mocked by leaders from Australia to France. With allies disillusioned, America is diminished.

Already, fewer leaders are asking what America will do to fix global security problems. So we’re left with the simple fact that in Trump’s effort to make America great, he has made it less exceptional. Trump’s base might rejoice in pulling inward and disrupting the culture of the presidency, but as he has already started to witness firsthand, the world isn’t rejoicing. Damaging America’s image of leadership will have lasting consequences for our security.

Illustration by Matthew Hollister

Philippines: President Duterte’s approval rating hits record high


Duterte is still popular among Filipinos a year into his administration. Source: Reuters/Edgar Su---Various activists groups display a streamer as they join other protesters in airing their individual concerns marking Duterte’s first year in office during a protest outside the presidential palace in metro Manila, Philippines, on June 30, 2017. Source: Reuters/Romeo Ranoco
2016-12-16T105103Z_39277373_RC13B48BD130_RTRMADP_3_SINGAPORE-PHILIPPINES-940x580  2017-06-29T122300Z_1995012235_RC19390DB1D0_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-DUTERTE-DOA  2017-06-30T070322Z_456539407_RC180ED36B30_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-DUTERTE-e1498970473328  2017-06-29T122300Z_1995012235_RC19390DB1D0_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-DUTERTE-DOA  2017-06-29T122300Z_1995012235_RC19390DB1D0_RTRMADP_3_PHILIPPINES-DUTERTE-DOA
A police line is placed around the body of a man killed by unknown gunmen in Manila, Philippines early October 25, 2016. Source: Reuters/Damir Sagolj
By  | 

AFTER A YEAR in office, Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has received a resounding thumbs up from a convincing majority of voters across the country, hitting a record high in the polls.

As a bloody war on drugs and fighting against Islamic militants in Marawi City drag on, a survey conducted by local pollster Social Weather Stations found 66 percent of Filipinos were satisfied with Duterte’s performance, granting him a “very good” rating overall.

The Social Weather Survey was conducted from June 23-26, 2017 – just days before the first anniversary of his swearing-in on June 30 – using face-to-face interviews of 1,200 adults nationwide.


 In metro Manila – the ground zero of Duterte’s drug war – his approval remained “very good” with 77 percent of respondents saying they were satisfied with his performance, compared to only 13 percent who said they were dissatisfied.

The Social Weather Survey found Duterte’s support is strong with both men and women, as well as among respondents from across the socioeconomic spectrum.

He is most popular among those who have graduated from college, who view his performance as “excellent.” Those with lower levels of education also polled solid support.
“The survey result is a clear indication of the growing confidence in the chief executive and his performance as the country’s leader,” said a spokesman for the presidential palace Ernesto Abella on Friday, as reported by state Philippine News Agency.

“The data collection concluded a month after [Duterte] placed the whole island of Mindanao under martial law shows tacit public support to the President’s action following the rebellion in Marawi,” he said.

After fighting broke out in Muslim-majority Marawi in May, Duterte declared 60 days of martial law over the entire island of Mindanao. The Supreme Court found earlier this week this was constitutionally legal, following threats from Duterte he would jail critics of martial law.

The poll shows Duterte suffered a sharp decrease in popularity in his home region of Mindanao, however, dropping 12 percentage points from 87 to 75 percent. His satisfaction rating there nevertheless remains “excellent.”


“This positive acknowledgement of the Filipino people further motivates the administration to work for the restoration of normalcy in Marawi and to start its rehabilitation as well as bring a comfortable life for all Filipinos, including Muslim Filipinos,” Abella said.

On Thursday, Human Rights Watch slammed proposals to introduce Muslim-only identification system in the country’s Central Luzon region, which authorities claim is needed to “identify and weed out undesirable individuals and terrorists.”

Experts have criticised Duterte’s focus on cracking down on drug use to the detriment of monitoring and combatting extremists in the Philippines, which they say culminated in the Marawi siege.

Bangladesh: Begum Matia Chowdhury

by Anwar A. Khan-
( July 7, 2017, Dhaka, Sri Lanka Guardian) Throughout her politics of student life, Matia Chowdhury was a fiery orator against the oppressive rule of the Pakistani regime and so, she was fondly canonized as “Ogni Konnya or the Girl of Fire.” That would make her the sole woman commander in chief in the eastern hemisphere and the first to rise to that lofty position strictly on her own merits. Given Bangladesh’s well-deserved reputation for machismo, the rise of the leader like her might seem like an extraordinary power shift. But when you look beyond sheer numbers, feminists will find less to celebrate. Political parties have been their gateways to power, and partly driven by a desire to preserve their relationships with powerful party patrons, they have done little to disturb the status quo. In effect, their gender has not had much impact on how they govern. But Matia stands on the principles what Warren G. Bennis says : “Leadership is the capacity to transform vision into reality.” Women were not simply spectators throughout the Independence struggles of Bangladesh. Many women took sides on political issues and joined independence movements in order to participate on many different levels. They played very important roles to fight back the tyrannous Pakistani regime. Amena Begum and Matia Chowdhury took the leading roles in all movements of the Bengali causes side by side with our male political stalwarts. Women took part in the revolution, including in leadership roles.

Why Eating Meat in America Is Like Going on a Trip to the Drug Store

Most of the meat Americans eat is banned in other industrialized countries.
Grilled suckling pig on a plate in banquet restaurant-Photo Credit: MariyaL/Shutterstock

HomeBy Martha Rosenberg / AlterNet-July 6, 2017,

Recently, Organic Consumers Association, along with Friends of the Earth and Center for Food Safety filed suit against chicken giant Sanderson Farms for falsely marketing its products as “100% Natural” even though it contains many unnatural and even prohibited substances. Sanderson chicken products tested positive for the antibiotic chloramphenical, banned in food animals, and amoxicillin, not approved for use in poultry production. Sanderson Farms products also tested positive for residues of steroids, hormones, anti-inflammatory drugs and even ketamine, a drug with hallucinogenic effects.

This is far from the first time unlabeled human drugs have been found in U.S. meat. The New York Times reported that most chicken feather-meal samples examined in one study contained Tylenol, one-third contained the antihistamine Benadryl, and samples from China actually contained Prozac. The FDA has caught hatcheries injecting antibiotics directly into chicken eggs. Tyson Foods was caught injecting eggs with the dangerous human antibiotic gentamicin.

The Natural Resources Defense Council has reported the presence of the potentially dangerous herbs fo-ti, lobelia, kava kava and black cohosh in the U.S. food supply as well as strong the antihistamine hydroxyzine. Most of the ingredients are from suppliers in China.

Animal Pharma still mostly under the radar

Many people have heard of Elanco, Eli Lilly’s animal drug division, and Bayer HealthCare Animal Health. But most big Pharma companies, including Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingolheim, Sanofi and Novartis operate similar lucrative animal divisions. Unlike "people" Pharma, Animal Pharma largely exists under the public’s radar: drug ads do not appear on TV nor do safety or marketing scandals reach Capitol Hill. Still, conflicts of interest abound.

“No regulation currently exists that would prevent or restrict a veterinarian from owning their own animals and/or feed mill,” says the Center for Food Safety. “If a licensed veterinarian also owns a licensed medicated feed mill, they stand to profit by diagnosing a flock or herd and prescribing their own medicated feed blend.”

Because the activities of Animal Pharma are so underreported, few Americans realize that most of the meat they eat is banned in other industrialized countries. One example is ractopamine, a controversial growth-promoting asthma-like drug marketed as Optaflexx for cattle, Paylean for pigs, and Topmax for turkeys and banned in the European Union, China and more than 100 other countries. Also used in U.S. meat production is Zilmax, a Merck drug similar to ractopamine that the FDA linked to 285 cattle deaths during six years of administration. Seventy-five animals lost hooves, 94 developed pneumonia and 41 developed bloat in just two years, Reuters reported.

The European Union boycotts the U.S.' hormone-grown beef. The routinely used synthetic hormones zeranol, trenbolone acetate and melengestrol acetate pose "increased risks of breast cancer and prostate cancer," says the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures. "Consumption of beef derived from Zeranol-implanted cattle may be a risk factor for breast cancer," according to an article in the journal Anticancer Research.

The European Union has also traditionally boycotted U.S. chickens because they are dipped in chlorine baths. In the U.S. it’s perfectly legal to ‘wash’ butchered chicken in strongly chlorinated water, according to a report in the Guardian:
These practices aren’t allowed in the EU, and the dominant European view has been that, far from reducing contamination, they could increase it because dirty abattoirs with sloppy standards would rely on it [chlorine] as a decontaminant rather than making sure their basic hygiene protocols were up to scratch.
Other germ-killing or germ-retarding chemicals routinely used in U.S. food
production include nitrites and nitrates in processed meat (declared carcinogens by the World Health Organization in 2016), the parasiticide formalin legally used in shrimp production, and carbon monoxide to keep meat looking red in the grocery store no matter how old it really is. Many thought public revulsion at the ammonia puffs used to discourage E. Coli growth in the notorious beef-derived “pink slime” in 2012 forced the product into retirement. But the manufacturer is fighting back aggressively.

Antibiotics are the least of unlabeled animal drugs

According to the Center for Food Safety, Animal Pharma uses over 450 animal drugs, drug combinations and other feed additives “to promote growth of the animals and to suppress the negative effects that heavily-concentrated confinement has on farm animals.”

The revelations about Sanderson Farms should come as no surprise given that despite new antibiotic regulations rolled out in 2013, and even more recently, antibiotic use in farm operations is on the rise. Sanderson Farms revelations are no surprise.

Last year I asked Michael Hansen, a senior staff scientist at Consumers Union, how the 2013 FDA guidance asking Pharma to voluntarily restrict livestock antibiotics by changing the approved uses language on labels was working out. Dr. Hansen told me “growth production” had been removed from labels but the drugs are still routinely used for the new indication of “disease prevention.”

After the guidance was published, a Reuters investigation found Tyson Foods, Pilgrim’s Pride, Perdue Farms, George’s and Koch Foods using antibiotics “more pervasively than regulators realize.” Pilgrim’s Pride’s feed mill records show the antibiotics bacitracin and monensin are added “to every ration fed to a flock grown early this year.” (Pilgrim’s Pride threatened legal action against Reuters for its finding.) Also caught red-handed using antibiotics, despite denying it on their website, was Koch Foods, a supplier to Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants. Koch’s Chief Financial Officer, Mark Kaminsky, reportedly said that he regretted the wording on the website.

But antibiotics are the least of the unlabeled drugs and chemicals lurking in meat. According to the Associated Press, U.S. chickens continue to be fed with inorganic arsenic to produce quicker weight gain with less food (the same reason antibiotics are given) despite some public outcry a few years ago. Arsenic is also given to turkeys, hogs and chickens for enhanced color. Such use “contribute[s] to arsenic exposure in the U.S. population,” says according to research in Environmental  Health Perspectives.

The appealing pink color of farmed salmon is also achieved with the chemicals astaxanthin and canthaxanthin. In the wild, salmon eat crustaceans and algae which make them pink; on farms they are an unappetizing and unmarketable gray.

There are legitimate reasons to use drugs, primarily to treat disease. Cattle host stomach-churning liver flukes, eyeworms, lungworms, stomach worms, thin-necked intestinal worms and whipworms, all of which are treated with parasiticides. Turkeys suffer from aspergillosis (brooder pneumonia), avian influenza, avian leucosis, histomoniasis, coccidiosis, coronavirus, erysipelas, typhoid, fowl cholera, mites, lice, herpes, clostridial dermatitis, cellulitis and more for which they are also treated with unlabeled drugs. (The Federal Register says the anti-coccidial drug halofuginone used in turkeys "is toxic to fish and aquatic life" and "an irritant to eyes and skin.” Users should take care to "Keep [it] out of lakes, ponds, and streams.") The endocrine disrupter Bisphenol A (BPA) has even been found in fresh turkey meat.

Food animals are also routinely given antifungal drugs and vaccines. Porcine epidemic diarrhea, which killed millions of animals in recent years, is treated with a vaccine. And a vaccine for the flock-killing bird flu is in the works. In fact, Big Food is working with Big Pharma to replace the widely assailed antibiotics with vaccines.

Drug use in food animals will get worse, not better

There are two reasons drug residues in food animals will soon grow worse not better. In exchange for China agreeing to accept U.S. beef after a long hiatus, the U.S. agreed to import cooked chickens from China. China’s food safety record is abysmal including rat meat sold as lamb, gutter oil sold as cooking oil, baby formula contaminated with melamine and frequent bird flu epidemics.
Globalization dangers already exist with seafood, most of which comes from countries that use chemicals and drugs banned in the U.S.

The second reason is the U.S. meat industry’s increasing move toward privatization and corporate self-policing—phasing out U.S. meat inspectors in favor of the “honor system.” USDA’s “New Poultry Inspection System” (NPIS) shamelessly allows poultry producers to switch to a voluntary program that allows for non-government poultry inspections. Such privatization deals are the wave of the future as federal meat inspectors are ignored and phased out by the government.

After all, we are living with an administration that sees regulations as nothing more than an impediment to Big Ag’s cheap meat agenda.

This story first appeared in Organic Consumers Association.

Martha Rosenberg is an investigative health reporter and the author of "Born With a Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp the Public Health (Random House)."

Scientists are starting to clear up one of the biggest controversies in climate science

 This color-coded map displays a progression of changing global surface temperature anomalies from 1880 through 2015. Higher than normal temperatures are shown in red and lower then normal temperatures are shown in blue. (NASA)



How much Earth will warm in response to future greenhouse gas emissions may be one of the most fundamental questions in climate science — but it’s also one of the most difficult to answer. And it’s growing more controversial: In recent years, some scientists have suggested that our climate models may actually be predicting too much future warming, and that climate change will be less severe than the projections suggest.

But new research is helping lay these suspicions to rest. A study, out Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, joins a growing body of literature that suggests the models are on track after all. And while that may be worrisome for the planet, it’s good news for the scientists working to understand its future.

The new study addresses a basic conflict between what the models suggest about future climate change and what we can infer from historical observations alone. Some scientists have suggested that the models may be too sensitive, pointing out that the warming they predict for the future is greater than what we would expect based only on the warming patterns we’ve observed since humans began emitting greenhouse gases.

The models, for instance, suggest that if the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere were to reach double its preindustrial level, the planet would warm by anywhere from about 1.5 to 4.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 to 8.1 Fahrenheit). But the warming patterns we’ve actually observed over the past 200 years or so would suggest that a doubling in carbon dioxide should only lead to about 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 Fahrenheit) of warming at the most.

The discrepancy has become a major cause for concern among climate scientists in recent years, according to the new study’s lead author Cristian Proistosescu, a research associate at the University of Washington who conducted the research while completing a PhD at Harvard. Even the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change acknowledged the issue in its most recent report, he said, stating that it could no longer provide a best estimate for the climate’s sensitivity.

“It worried a lot of us,” Proistosescu told The Washington Post. “We needed to understand why our different estimates didn’t work.”

The new study helps reconcile the models with the historical record. It suggests global warming occurs in different phases or “modes” throughout the planet, some of which happen more quickly than others. Certain slow-developing climate processes could amplify warming to a greater extent in the future, putting the models in the right after all. But these processes take time, even up to several hundred years, to really take effect — and because not enough time has passed since the Industrial Revolution for their signal to really develop, the historical record is what’s actually misleading at the moment.

This conclusion is supported by a growing body of research, which suggests that warming estimates made from the historical record alone are “potentially biased low, for reasons we are now just beginning to understand,” said Timothy Andrews, a climate scientist with the Met Office, the United Kingdom’s national weather service, in an email to The Washington Post. While Andrews was not involved with the new study, he’s one of multiple scientists whose recent research has tackled the same issue.

The new study uses a statistical method to separate “fast” and “slow” climate modes in the models. According to Proistosescu, when greenhouse gases are emitted into the atmosphere, a “fast” warming effect begins to take place almost immediately in certain parts of the planet, mainly over the land masses in the Northern Hemisphere. Indeed, these are the parts of Earth where the most rapid warming has been observed since the Industrial Revolution.

On the other hand, he said, other parts of the planet — namely, the Southern Ocean and the eastern Pacific — respond much more slowly, in part because they’re just so deep and cold to begin with. But as they absorb more heat and finally start to warm up, they may produce a variety of climate feedback effects that enhance the global warming that’s already occurring. For instance, changes in ocean temperatures can alter atmospheric patterns around the world. The models suggest that these warming ocean regions may lead to a decrease in reflective cloud cover in the future, allowing more solar radiation to make it through the atmosphere to Earth’s surface.

While the impact of these processes may be profound, they can also take long periods of time to unfold, Proistosescu said — potentially up to 300 years or so. Through their statistical parsing, the researchers found that the models suggest the effects of this slow climate mode only account for about 3 percent of the human-caused warming we’ve seen so far. But in the future, under a scenario in which atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations double, it could account for up to half of all warming that occurs.

Since they were able to separate the fast and slow climate modes, the researchers also conducted a test to see what would happen if they only applied fast climate warming in the models. When they did so, the model predictions suddenly fell in line with the historical record — suggesting that the still-developing slow mode is the reason the two have failed to match so far.

That said, the study does beg the question of how we can be so sure the slow climate mode will actually develop as it does in the model, since humans have yet to really observe it in nature.
According to Piers Forster, a University of Leeds climate scientist who has also studied climate sensitivity, the models tend to rely on certain assumptions that have not yet unfolded in real life — for instance, that the eastern Pacific will eventually warm to a greater extent than the western Pacific.

“This doesn’t necessarily mean the models are wrong,” he added in an emailed comment to The Washington Post. But, he said, it does suggest that “we do not yet fully understand these long term changes in the Pacific and therefore these climate change amplification effects.”

According to Proistosescu, some studies of Earth’s ancient climate — which scientists can conduct using information from sources like ice cores and preserved sediments — do suggest that a slow climate mode does exist and has occurred in the past. And he added that the climate models rely on basic physical processes to a great extent, and “we trust that they do the basic physics correctly.”

But he agreed that some caution — or at least a great deal more research on how these slow climate responses will continue to develop — is called for. In fact, identifying the uncertainties that remain about Earth’s climate sensitivity is another significant outcome of the study, he suggested.

The research indicates that the models and the historical record are not so different after all, and that there are certain large-scale climate feedback processes still unfolding. How exactly those develop may still be uncertain — no one’s arguing that the models are currently perfect, Proistosescu said.
“But they’re close enough that you trust that there is an effect there, you just need to better quantify what that is,” he added. “And that’s where a lot of the work is going.”