Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Garbage, again

2017-06-15

Waste materials were seen gathered in several places in Colombo recently as they have not been removed by the authorities on a regular basis. Pics by Kushan Pathiraja




Waste materials were seen gathered in several places in Colombo recently as they have not been removed by the authorities on a regular basis. Pics by Kushan Pathiraja


Brighter skies over SriLankan Airlines’ financial position


article_image
Ajith Dias, Chairman - SriLankan Airlines and Suren Ratwatta, CEO SriLankan Airlines- 

Contrary to inaccurate reports in the press, the management of SriLankan Airlines would like to point out that since the Unity government was formed, the airline’s losses have been dramatically reduced, A press release issued by SriLankan Airlines stated yesterday.

LKR 91.8 billion in losses between 2011 & 2015 reduced to a fraction of this colossal number by 2017, the press release stated.

It further noted that the fuel price reduction of 2015 saw a drop in ticket prices which did not recover when fuel increased again. The effect of this, coupled with the acceptance of several new (and expensive) aircraft, a depreciation of the LKR and other currencies against the USD (the majority of airline costs are in USD) saw a weakening of the balance sheet. The runway re-surfacing project at Colombo Airport, which was absolutely necessary, also forced the national carrier to cancel over 600 flights, equivalent to two entire weeks of scheduled services, in the first three months of 2017. These factors combined to worsen the performance of what could have been a successful financial year in 2016/17.

The airline continues to pay a heavy price for the extremely high lease rental agreements entered into by the previous government. The cost of terminating the leases on four A350-900 aircraft that were grossly overpriced and completely unsuitable for the national carrier, imposed a further burden on the airline. (One-off items in table above)

The airline is now undergoing a modest recovery in revenues and is about to launch significant regional expansion. Three new destinations in India, direct flights to Hong Kong & Guangzhou and a long awaited non-stop service to Australia are all planned in the coming months.

Further restructuring is required in order to reduce the cost base and make the company competitive in this extremely challenging market.

The Directors and management team are confident that with the support of the shareholder, the recovery of the national airline will continue and the positive trend will be further improved upon.

BOI Chief’s son on a rampage

BOI Chief’s son on a rampage
 Jun 15, 2017

Every staff member in the BOI knows that 2016, was the worst year in the history of the BOI.
Even at the height of the War the BOI managed to mobilize over $500 Million. But in 2016, the BOI only mobilized a measly $400 million.  2017 is set become even worse.
Therefore unless the President the appointing authority steps up and does something fast the BOI is going to fail once more.
The Chinese Ambassador highlighted how poorly Sri Lanka is faring in attracting FDI to the country because of the way business is conducted at the BOI.
Sri Lanka has the biggest Investment Agency in South Asia, but cannot even mobilize one fraction what Bangladesh and India can mobilize. Investors complain the BOI Chief Upul Jayasuriya – a former legal officer of the BOI is the biggest stumbling block.  
An investor who was hoping to do an apartment complex on Vauxhall Street told the writer the BOI Chief openly told the Japanese investor to work with his son and drop the Sri Lankan promoter.
Though he complained to higher ups no action was taken. The BOI Chief has got his son appointed to companies and gets kickbacks according to a senior BOI official.
As to why the Minister is not acting is a huge problem for the Staff of the BOI.

Trapped and traumatized in Gaza


A decade of siege and three successive Israeli offenses have destroyed Gaza’s economy, leaving many youth with little hope for a better life.Anne PaqActiveStills
Samih is demoralized.

Sarah Algherbawi- 13 June 2017

Two years ago, he graduated with an engineering degree from the Islamic University of Gaza.

Despite applying for many jobs, the only work he has found has been as a casual laborer. The pay has only been enough to provide him with some pocket money and let him buy cigarettes.

“For a decade now, the Gaza Strip has gone from one crisis to another. Every day you wake up to hear of new crises: wage cuts, electricity cuts, problems with water, lack of medicines, closed crossings. Everything just makes us feel more and more hopeless here.”

Samih has tried to leave Gaza via the Rafah border crossing. His plan was to travel through the crossing – which separates Gaza and Egypt – and then towards Turkey.

But the Egyptian authorities have blocked him.

With Gaza under an Israeli siege for the past 10 years, Rafah has been the only exit to the outside world for most of Gaza’s 2 million inhabitants. Yet Egypt has compounded the siege by sealing its border.

“It’s a cruel feeling to go from being young, active and full of hope to being depressed,” Samih said. “Gaza is not a good place to live. If I had a choice, I would not live here.”

The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor has estimated that more than half of all people in Gaza have experienced depression.

“Alarming”

Abd Hamid Muharib, a psychotherapist with the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, described such statistics as “highly alarming.”

Since late 2008, Israel has launched three major offensives against Gaza. The attacks have been “full of catastrophes which increase the number of depressed people,” Muharib said.

Problems associated with depression – including addiction and emotional disorders – are acute among young people.

At one private mental health clinic, there were 28 patients in the waiting room. All, bar six of them, were aged in their twenties.

“This society does not offer any hope to improve the lives of these young people,” said Muhammad Abu al-Sabah, a psychologist at the clinic. “Their families have seen their economic status deteriorate continuously due to the siege. There are few opportunities and this has made families feel helpless.”

The hopelessness caused by the siege, he added, has been worsened by the divisions between the main Palestinian political parties.

Duaa has a 24-year-old son who tried to commit suicide. He had just been turned down for a job.
The ordeal has left Duaa, aged 54, traumatized. She has been sitting at home, listless. All four of her sons have university degrees. All four are unemployed.

“When they were children, I thought I would be able to help them build their future,” she said. “Now it seems like I will die sitting and thinking here.”

Huge numbers of young Palestinians face similar difficulties to her sons. At around 60 percent, Gaza’s youth unemployment has reached “world-record levels,” according to United Nations data.

Unhappy birthday

Shaima was unhappy at her own party. She had just turned 28.

“I don’t know exactly why I’m celebrating my birthday,” she said. “Every year I get older without achieving anything for me or my baby daughter.”

An accountant, Shaima works eight hours per day for a small wage. Half of her income goes to rent. “There is no way to get ahead in this country,” she said. “I hope that I can celebrate my next birthday outside Gaza.”

Firas al-Tanani is a member of the Palestinian national volleyball team. Last year, a club in Tunisia offered him the chance of turning professional. He had hoped to be able to send back money to his family. Al-Tanani’s father is out of work and is finding it difficult to support his children.

The constant closure of Rafah prevented al-Tanani from taking up the offer. When al-Tanani realized that there was no way of leaving Gaza, he went into a depression.

“Sport was always my passion,” the 22-year-old said. “But now I’ve started thinking seriously of retiring from the sports world as it doesn’t help in making a living here. Nobody cares for our talents and skills.”

Sahar, a 28-year-old, called Gaza “one big maze, where nothing is clear and there never seems to be any exit.”

Going to the beach is the only pleasure available to people without money. Yet with the sea heavily polluted, such trips can have unhealthy consequences.

Following one recent trip to the sea, Sahar’s children fell ill with gastroenteritis. “How much more can we suffer?” Sahar asked.

She acknowledged, though, that the situation could worsen.

“If there is another war, we could lose everything in the blink of an eye,” she said.

“I have two boys – aged 9 and 5. The first one has witnessed three wars. His brother has witnessed two. I can’t believe that my kids have had to go through that.”

Sarah Algherbawi is a freelance translator and writer from Gaza.


Editor’s note: A correction has been made since publication. Abd Hamid Muharib is the name of the psychotherapist quoted in this article; his first name was originally written as Ahmad.

The Six Day War - Myth and Reality


Soldiers of the Air Force, The blustering and swashbuckling Egyptian Army is moving against us to annihilate our people… - Battle Order of the Officer Commanding Israeli Air Force, Monday, June 5th 1967

TUESDAY, 13 JUNE 2017

The Six Day War of June 1967, a series of battles fought by the armed forces of the state of Israel against a combination of Arab armies, is one of manifold significance. From a military standpoint, it presented a model strategy of how to prosecute and win a war waged on several fronts.


Suicide bomber strikes at Shia mosque in western Kabul

Several killed in latest of a string of attacks on civilians in Afghanistan during holy month of Ramadan

 The UN’s secretary general, António Guterres (centre), meets displaced families on the outskirts of Kabul on Wednesday. Photograph: Shah Marai/AFP/Getty Images

 in Kabul-Thursday 15 June 2017

At least four people have been killed in Kabul after a suicide bomber and gunmen attacked a mosque where worshippers had gathered for an important Shia holiday.

Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack, which comes after weeks of escalating violence that have turned this year’s holy month of Ramadan into one of the most violent periods in the Afghan capital since 2001.

Thursday’s attack began when a suicide bomber was prevented from entering al-Zahra mosque in western Kabul, prompting an exchange of fire with police, according to Najib Danish, a spokesman for the interior ministry.

The attacker detonated his explosives in a kitchen outside the prayer hall. Some reports said gunfire continued from other attackers after the blast.

A witness, Hussein Endali, said he heard police shouting before an explosion ripped through the courtyard. “I sat in my car for 30 minutes while gunfire was going on,” Endali said, adding that he saw at least three dead bodies.

Kabul police said four people were dead, including three civilians, and five were wounded. The numbers were expected to rise. Local media said six people had been killed.

Al-Zahra mosque in Dasht-e Barchi is often visited by officials and politicians. It was unclear whether any dignitaries were among the victims.

Among the dead was Haji Ramazan, a well-known local businessman who helped found the mosque.
The attack was the latest in a string of deadly assaults on civilians during Ramadan. On 31 May a truck bomb in Kabul’s diplomatic quarter killed more than 150 people. Days later police shot and killed nine people at an anti-government protest. A triple suicide bombing at a funeral for one of the protesters killed 20 people, according to officials.

The 21st day of Ramadan holds special importance to Shia Muslims who commemorate the martyrdom in 661 AD of Imam Ali, who they believe was the rightful heir to the prophet Muhammad.

It was the third attack on a Shia mosque in Kabul since October. Gunmen killed at least 14 people in one attack, and a suicide attacker killed more than 30 people in another. Islamic State news outlets claimed responsibility for both attacks.

The Taliban denied responsibility for Thursday’s attack, claiming they never targeted mosques.
However, in an attack on an army base in northern Afghanistanin April, Taliban fighters killed more than 140 mostly unarmed soldiers, some of them while leaving the base’s mosque.


On Wednesday the UN’s secretary general, António Guterres, landed in Kabul for talks with government and civic leaders .

Turkish opposition begins 24-day 'justice march' after MP's jailing


Thousands set off on 24-day march from Ankara to Istanbul, in protest at 25-year sentence against CHP politician accused of spying
Protesters set off from Ankara on the CHP's justice march (Reuters)

Suraj Sharma's picture
Suraj Sharma-Thursday 15 June 2017

ISTANBUL, Turkey – Thousands gathered at a heavily guarded park in central Ankara on Thursday demanding justice, and to support the leader of Turkey's biggest opposition party, who set off on a 24-day "Justice March" after one of his party's MPs was sentenced to 25 years in prison for "spying".
Kemal Kilicdaroglu, chairman of the Republican People's Party (CHP), in an address to the crowd before starting his walk said the marches would continue until justice was restored in the country.
"Our only demand is justice. This is a holy march; this is not about any political party. We are living under an autocratic administration installed by the 20 July coup," he said, referring to the introduction of a state of emergency on 20 July granting the government expanded powers including the ability to bypass parliament and rule by decree.
"We don't want MPs and journalists in prison in our country. We want justice for everyone," said Kilicdaroglu. "Enough now. This country will get justice. Justice, justice, justice. If a price has to be paid, I am willing to be the first to pay it."
The march is in response to the sentencing of CHP MP Enis Berberoglu on Wednesday to 25 years in prison for engaging in "espionage".
Berberoglu was accused of providing the Cumhuriyet newspaper with video purporting to show Turkey's intelligence agency trucking weapons into Syria.
The newspaper reported in May 2015 that the trucks, which were allegedly owned by Turkey's state intelligence service MIT, were found to contain weapons and ammunition when they were stopped and searched in the southern Turkish province of Adana in early 2014.
Media reports said the weapons were destined for the Islamic State group - a claim the Turkish government denies.
The president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, at the time said the shipment was from MIT but that it was headed for Turkmen fighters opposed to both Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, and to IS militants.
Erdogan had publically vowed to ensure that those involved in the publishing of that video would pay dearly, calling them "traitors and spies" for revealing national secrets.
Pro-government supporters say the prosecutors who ordered the search of the MIT trucks were Gulenists, followers of the US-based Muslim preacher Fethullah Gulen whom the authorities accuse of trying to topple Turkey's constitutional order and also of carrying out last July's failed coup attempt.
They also say the media outlet that published those videos must therefore have links to the Gulenists.  

Appeal launched

Berberoglu's lawyer on Thursday morning launched an appeal against the sentence and arrest at an Istanbul court.
The CHP has called the sentence "politically motivated" and accused judges of acting as pawns of Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).
Police sealed off Ankara's Guven Park on Wednesday night after Kilicdaroglu had said he would be there on Thursday with nothing more than a sign reading "justice".
Body searches were carried out on those seeking to enter the area on Thursday and sniffer dogs patrolled to detect explosives.
The Ankara governor's office issued a statement calling for police instructions to be observed to ensure safety.   
Some of the chants from the crowd as Kilicdaroglu started his march towards Istanbul were directed at Erdogan and the AKP.
Don't remain silent, it will be your turn if you do
- marchers' chant
Chants of "don't remain silent, it will be your turn if you do", and "shoulder to shoulder for justice" were interspersed with chants of "thief, murderer AKP" and "thief, murderer Erdogan".
The protesters only carried signs that read "adalet", justice in Turkish. No political party symbols or flags were on display.

'Not a palace decision'

The AKP in its first reaction on Wednesday rejected the CHP's labelling of the court verdict as being instructions from the presidential palace.
Bulent Turan, an AKP MP, speaking in parliament said: "It is ridiculous to call a judicial decision a palace decision."
Speaking after the CHP staged a walkout from parliament, he said: "Threatening to leave parliament is an insult to those who voted for you. You [CHP] also voted to lift the immunity from prosecution of MPs. It wasn't just an AK Party decision."
The CHP has also come in for criticism from non-AKP supporters for keeping silent when MPs from the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) were imprisoned after the state of emergency was introduced.
The government has used expanded powers granted to it under the state of emergency to launch a large-scale purge of opponents.
More than 40,000 have been arrested and the number of people sacked or suspended from their jobs exceeds 125,000.

'Ideological bias'

Erdogan, in a speech on Wednesday, said state of emergency measures only targeted terrorist organisations and any criticism of the government regarding human rights and democracy were the result of "ideological bias".
The CHP has also announced the holding of a "justice watch" in each of Turkey's 81 provinces.
The party has said the justice watches, similar to the democracy watches that were held after the failed 15 July coup attempt, will continue until the independence of the judicial system in the country is restored.
Hundreds of people, including CHP MPs, on Thursday started gathering at Macka Democracy Park, the designated venue for the Istanbul watch. A vigil was also expected in front of the Maltepe prison in Istanbul where Berberoglu is currently being held.
There have been no confrontations or clashes between security forces and protesters at any of the events.
The criminal investigation of Trump puts his presidency in peril
 The special counsel overseeing the investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election is interviewing senior intelligence officials to determine whether President Trump attempted to obstruct justice, officials said. (Patrick Martin,McKenna Ewen/The Washington Post)

 
The Post reports:
The special counsel overseeing the investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election is interviewing senior intelligence officials as part of a widening probe that now includes an examination of whether President Trump attempted to obstruct justice, officials said. 
The move by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to investigate Trump’s conduct marks a major turning point in the nearly year-old FBI investigation, which until recently focused on Russian meddling during the presidential campaign and on whether there was any coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Investigators have also been looking for any evidence of possible financial crimes among Trump associates, officials said.
Former FBI director James B. Comey, in his testimony last week, quite clearly was laying the factual predicate for a possible obstruction charge — detailing Trump’s efforts to persuade Comey to drop the investigation of Michael T. Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, and when that did not work, firing Comey with a false pretextual explanation.

The president and his surrogates are already on the warpath, falsely suggesting that Comey engaged in improper or illegal conduct in leaking his memos and, putting out the line via Kellyanne Conway, that members of Mueller’s legal team had given to Democratic politicians (and therefore were biased). None of that will prove successful, in large part because there reportedly are a parade of other witnesses. (“Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week.”) These witnesses are likely to provide an account not unlike Comey’s in which the president wanted them to interfere with Comey’s Russia investigation.

Post Opinion columnists Ruth Marcus and Jennifer Rubin deconstruct the legal and moral quagmire President Trump faces following fired FBI director James B. Comey's testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8. (Adriana Usero/The Washington Post)

No wonder Trump is still ruminating about firing Mueller. His aides correctly point out that this would be politically disastrous, fueling impeachment fever. But Trump certainly has one thing right: His presidency is imperiled so long as Mueller compels witnesses to testify, accumulates written evidence and traces the myriad of ties between the Trump team and Russians.

Onlookers have assumed that any obstruction was intended to prevent evidence of “collusion” or Russian infiltration of Trump’s campaign from surfacing. However, the subject matter of the underlying investigation may extend to financial crimes, putting Trump’s and his associates’ international business dealings under the microscope.

The addition to Mueller’s team of a prosecutor including Andrew Weissmann, Supreme Court advocate and criminal law expert Michael Dreeben, and others experienced in complex fraud and international bribery cases suggests that the probe may be looking at more than “collusion” between Russian officials and Trump team members. For example, “it appears he has recruited an experienced Justice Department trial attorney, Lisa Page, a little-known figure outside the halls of Main Justice but one whose résumé boasts intriguing hints about where Mueller’s Russia investigation might lead. Page has deep experience with money laundering and organized crime cases, including investigations where she’s partnered with an FBI task force in Budapest, Hungary, that focuses on eastern European organized crime. That Budapest task force helped put together the still-unfolding money laundering case against Ukrainian oligarch Dmitry Firtash, a one-time business partner of [Paul] Manafort.”) News reports speculate that Mueller could be investigating potential money-laundering by Trump team members.

It bears repeating that only Mueller and his team know the exact contours of an investigation. A counterintelligence inquiry into Russian interference now extends — as these things inevitably do — to possible financial dealings of Trump and his associates and possible “procedural” crimes (e.g. obstruction, perjury, lying to the FBI). The president might want to consider finding an actual expert in criminal law to represent him; this investigation is extensive, serious and possibly career-ending for a growing list of figures, which now certainly includes the president.

A look at President Trump’s first year in office, so far

Scenes from the Republican’s first months in the White House.

Germany Hits Back at Possible New U.S. Sanctions on Russia

Germany Hits Back at Possible New U.S. Sanctions on Russia


No automatic alt text available.BY DAVID FRANCIS-JUNE 15, 2017 

Germany and Austria hit back at U.S. lawmakers Thursday, one day after the Senate passed new provisions that could open the door to sanctions on European companies that do energy business with Russia.

The Senate amendment, which passed overwhelmingly but which still needs to clear the House, would ramp up U.S.ability to hit back at Russia. Specifically, under the new legislation, the White House would have the authority to extend sanctions to any firm that invests money to help build Russian energy projects. That takes square aim at Nord Stream 2, a pipeline that would deliver natural gas from Russia directly to Germany, bypassing Ukraine.

On Thursday, German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel and Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern said in a joint statement the sanctions, if implemented, could threaten Russian gas supplies to Europe. They called the bill a “new and very negative quality in the European-American relations”.

“Europe’s energy supply is a matter of Europe, not the United States of America!,” said the statement. “We can not accept . . . the threat of illegal extraterritorial sanctions against European companies that participate in the development of European energy supply!”

Nord Stream has torn Europe apart already. Eastern and Central European countries oppose the project, fearing that their dependence on Russian energy would increase. Many Western European countries, especially Germany, back it, arguing that a new pipeline will increase supplies and lower energy prices in Europe. U.S. officials in the Obama and Trump administrations have opposed the pipeline, saying it could undermine European energy security.

If the legislation passes the House and survives any veto threats from President Donald Trump, it could be used against companies like Shell, Uniper, Wintershall, Engie, and OMV, which are teaming up with Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy behemoth, to build the $10.6 billion pipe.

At the same time, Gabriel and Kern allege the United States was acting in the interest of domestic suppliers, which in recent years have begun to export natural gas and even crude oil, including to Europe.

“The goal is to secure jobs in the oil and gas industry in the USA,” they said. “Who gives us energy and how we decide is according to the rules of openness and market competition.”

In a statement, the Nord Stream 2 consortium said, “This unprecedented course of action is clearly aimed at undermining the position of a future commercial competitor in an already diversified market. It follows similar scare tactics by some European countries with existing or planned gas import infrastructure to protect their own commercial interests by using political arguments.”

Meanwhile, not to be outdone, Russian President Vladimir Putin weighed in, threatening retaliation if the new measures become law.
Are we going to extend retaliatory measures against Western sanctions? Not if our Western partners lift sanctions against Russia 
 
Photo credit: ERIC PIERMONT/Getty Images
Pakistan: PM appears before panel probing family’s wealth


2017-06-12T091920Z_131842918_RC1151E6A8F0_RTRMADP_3_PAKISTAN-POLITICS-940x580
Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif looks out the window of his plane after attending a ceremony to inaugurate the M9 motorway between Karachi and Hyderabad, Pakistan February 3, 2017. Pic: Reuters


15th June 2017

PRIME MINISTER Nawaz Sharif appeared before a panel investigating his family’s wealth on Thursday, the first time a Pakistani prime minister has been grilled by an investigative agency.

The scrutiny of Sharif has gripped Pakistan, but the investigation – ordered by the Supreme Court – has become increasingly politicised.

Sharif arrived at the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) in Islamabad clad in traditional shalwar kameez tunic and baggy trousers, but did not speak to media.

It was not clear how long the hearing, which had been scheduled to begin at 11 a.m. (0600 GMT), would last.


The prime minister and his children deny any wrongdoing.

The Supreme Court ruled in April there was insufficient evidence to remove Sharif from office over corruption allegations levelled by the opposition, but it ordered further investigations.

The Supreme Court agreed last year to investigate the Sharif family’s offshore wealth after the opposition threatened protests after the leaking of the “Panama Papers”.

Documents leaked from the Panama-based Mossack Fonseca law firm appeared to show that Sharif’s daughter and two sons owned offshore holding companies registered in the British Virgin Islands and used them to buy properties in London.

Sharif, whose father was a prominent industrialist, has said his family wealth was acquired legally.

A three-time prime minister, Sharif was ousted twice in the 1990s, including in a 1999 military coup. He later lived in exile, mostly in Saudi Arabia.

He swept back to power in an election in 2013.

His spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.

Pakistan has been plagued by corruption for decades, with politicians often accusing rivals of graft.

The Supreme Court has given the panel two months to investigate the family and then deliver its findings.

The six-man panel, made up of members of civilian investigative agencies and military intelligence officers, are examining three generations of Sharif family wealth.


The team has accused government departments of tampering with old records, but Finance Minister Ishaq Dar on Wednesday rejected such allegations, adding that the team’s claims meant the process was becoming “suspicious”, media reported.

Sharif’s camp has sought to remove two members of the investigation team and his rulingPakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party voiced outrage over a leaked photograph taken from security camera footage showing Sharif’s son, Hussain, appearing before the panel.

Opinion polls suggest Sharif’s party is likely to win the next election, due next year.

A senior PML-N official told Reuters the party was unlikely to call an early election if Sharif was ousted by a Supreme Court ruling, and would select a new prime minister to take over until the general election. – Reuters

Common Sense – A Relic of the Past?


The prevailing atmosphere in the world is one of fear for the future, of growing intolerance, of hate not only towards those who are in any way different, but towards those who dare to think differently and to voice their opinion. In the creation of such an atmosphere the once respected journalistic profession played a shameful role

by Tomislav Jakić-

( June 14, 2017. Vienna, Sri Lanka Guardian) Once upon a time, this is how fairy tales usually begin. This is not a fairy tale, but once upon a time people used to talk about common sense and to think based on common sense. It was never an ideal time, but always when it seemed that the lack of common sense and the evil in us would draw the world in the abyss of self-destruction, common sense woke up and rebelled; most usually in combination with pragmatism. Mankind paid dearly in the ensuing battle, it went through unbelievable horrors, but eventually common sense would prevail. And so it went until the year 1990, when the cold war ended. It was an extremely dangerous confrontation between two, not only ideologically different blocks. The world peace was saved only due to the fragile, but at the same time efficient balance of fear, namely on the knowledge that an open armed confrontation would end without anybody being victorious. But, as from the beginning of the last decade of the 20th century, when East – West confrontation ended, due to the fact that the Soviet block disintegrated, when the “dawn of democracy” begun shining on countries, previously ruled with iron hand from one centre and by one and only party and its repressive system, we are witnessing a constant and steady downgrading in all sectors of life. Because of this and despite democracy as a system, despite democratic forms and despite the multiparty system, it is unavoidable that we put to ourselves the question: does common sense belongs to the past, is t a relic of the past?

All indications point towards a positive answer.

In international relations we are experiencing the revival of the cold war, a new and with every day passing more dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Russian Federation. In fact it is nothing more than the almost desperate striving of neoliberal capitalism to “rule the world”. In order to be able to achieve this goal, to gain the support (of previously manipulated citizens, but – alas – in the best democratic form) for the policy of expansionism, regardless of anything, neoliberal capitalism needs an enemy. Because having an enemy is the best way to homogenize one’s own flock. And the enemy was found, better to say it was projected in the picture of Russia, although – and this is ironic indeed – it is the democratic West that is today practicing the policy of hegemony, once a trade mark of the Soviet Union. All basic principles upon which the architecture of international relations was build, are abandoned. Nobody even thinks of speaking about the principle of equality, or the principle of not meddling in internal affairs of other states, not to mention the right of every country and nation to develop as they think it suits them best. In a globalised world, and we were made to believe that only such a world could exist, everything must be “cooked following the same recipe”. If this is not the case, with or without the blessing of the UN and under the disguise of the war for democracy and for human rights, bombers start their deadly missions, mercilessly killing those whose human rights they are supposed to protect. Whole states are pushed into chaos and internal fighting, whole regions are destabilized and heads of states are killed (just remember Hillary Clinton and her words, when she received the news that colonel Ghadafi was killed: “We came, we saw and he is dead!”). At the same time for billions of dollars modern arms are being sold to states whose record in the field of democracy and human rights is – to put it mildly – very poor. But they are “ours”. With growing speed the world is being divided between the ever smaller part of privileged and rich, those who are governing not because they were democratically elected to do so, but because they have the power to do so and the ever bigger part of oppressed – in every sense – and poor, those who are being governed. While thousands and thousands of people are dying from hunger in the undeveloped countries, Europeans waste in one year so much food that every hungry human being on this planet Earth could be fed. And the American President says that climate changes and their evident results are just a hoax. Is there any common sense in all this? No, there is none!

So, what can we expect, what is to be expected? Let us put forward just two scenarios. The first is the armed confrontation between East and West, be it direct, be it as a consequence of some action of the unpredictable US President – amateur (for example a missile attack on North Korea). In both cases the consequences would be disastrous, not to say suicidal. The second scenario is slightly “milder”. It is based on the presumption that the oppressed, the hungry and the poor would conclude that they have nothing to lose, but their lives, and a tornado of revolution would hit the whole world with a highly uncertain result. Indications that are pointing towards this scenario we can detect in attacks whose perpetrators are more and more often terrorizing the countries of the West. While it is true that these attacks are – at least – disguised as being religiously motivated, it is not less true that there is no religion that could motivate suicide attackers, were it not for the basic and deeply rooted feeling of being pushed to the margines of the society, of being deprived of some basic rights, such as the right to be educated, the right to be medically cared for, in short the right to live, as a human being, a decent life.

There too we confront the results of a policy without any common sense, a policy that recruited the oppressed, the poor, but pathological killers too, trying to use them as an instrument for achieving its goals, only to meet now the murderers it produced as its own enemies. There can be no doubt about it – they, the terrorists, were produced by the policy of the West, they were armed and supported thanks to this policy – either directly, or through smaller countries, satellites of the “big Brother” form the other side of the Atlantic. And now this same policy is being confronted by them – globally. Still it will not, or cannot accept the fact that the terrorists are the greatest danger for the world as we knew it and that the fight against them should be the prime – and common – target of our civilization. It will not, or cannot accept Russia as an ally in this war; on the contrary it is continuing to present Russia as an enemy (adversary), adding – if it seems to be suitable – Iran, North Korea and sometimes China. Is there any common sense in all this? None whatsoever!

And is there some common sense in the policy of the so called transition countries? Absolutely not! Former Soviet satellites only changed their master, they became champions in the battle against the (non existing) communism, because it suits the neoliberal capitalism for which the very idea of communism is the worst imaginable enemy. At the same time these countries are deeply engulfed in historic revisionism, “writing” the new history of WW 2 and the Antifascists struggle, while “forgetting” their collaboration with Nazi-fascism. Republic of Croatia, to name one example, invented the formula about “all totalitarian regimes being equal evil”, thus putting on the same level antifascism (labeled for this purpose as communism) and fascism, while Republic of Serbia – just another example – rehabilitates in court procedures the leaders of the Chetnik movement which collaborated with the occupying forces during WW2 and fought against Marshal Tito’s partisans.

The prevailing atmosphere in the world is one of fear for the future, of growing intolerance, of hate not only towards those who are in any way different, but towards those who dare to think differently and to voice their opinion. In the creation of such an atmosphere the once respected journalistic profession played a shameful role. Not only the mainstream media, but social networks too are transformed into a snake’s pit of intrigues, lies and disinformation servicing the policy that forgot what common sense is.

The rest is silence.