Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Emerging HR leaders: High-Tech and High Touch
  • South Asia’s largest HR Conference NHRC 2017 on 20 and 21 June
logoMonday, 5 June 2017

The National Human Resource Conference (NHRC) of 2017, the largest HR Conference in South Asia is round the corner. Whilst we are recovering from a huge human tragedy that is only second to the tsunami, the focus is on being humane in uplifting human lives. This column and the next will highlight the nature and features of NHRC 2017 in inviting the Daily FT readership to enjoy an insightful and interactive experience.
IN-1IN-1.1
Overview 

I am delighted to drive a dynamic community of diverse people in presenting a distinctly different experience at the NHRC 2017. We have aptly selected the theme: ‘Emerging HR Leaders: High Tech and High Touch’. We will deliberate on digitalisation, disruption, diversity and design with regard to this inspirational intervention.

At a time when we are increasingly challenged by a multi-cultural, multi-generational and multi-skilled workforce, the role of HR professionals is becoming increasingly critical. They have to think and act as leaders and not as laggards. Such emerging HR leaders have to be “tech-savvy” in reaping the dividends of digitalisation, on one hand. On the other hand, they have to be “touch-savvy” in recognising the emotions of engaged employees. Thus, the challenging balance between high tech and high touch is right in front of the HR leaders. They have to be authentic in producing value by practicing values in such an enormous endeavour.

IN-1.2As we are aware, HR leaders are very high in demand. It is much easy to do your bit and to be an isolated individual. Yet, the current times demand HR professionals to demonstrate the leader within. It, in essence, boils down to influencing, inspiring and instructing, with a tough mind and a tender heart, in ensuing right results and relationships. That’s the sure fire way to be at the top and not at the tap. This is the context, in which the Institute  of Personnel Management (IPM) Sri Lanka, being the national leader in HR has  decided to  focus  on this year’s national HR conference  to reflect  on and relate  to its  obligations  to the  nation, in grooming HR leaders.

Ironically, we have an over-emphasis on private sector HR with less focus on public sector. This should be rectified through a sensible dialog on best HR practices and their applicability to both private and public sectors alike.  HR can be a bridge between private and public sectors as its key functions have an overarching effect on utilising the most precious resource of any organisation. National HR Conference (NHRC 2017) intends to fill this void in a meaningful and memorable manner.

Technology as a key driver 

Technology has always been an enhancer of our work. From adding machine to the advanced computer this was the case. Digitalisation has become a wave spreading across the world, revealing multiple varieties. This power to unveil not only transforms human outreach and actions, but also changes our conceptions; about whom we are, about our uses and about human horizons for sense-making (Fors, 2010). According to www.gartner.com, digitalisation is the use of digital technologies to change a business model and provide new revenue and value-producing opportunities; it is the process of moving to a digital business.

“We are witnessing profound shifts across all industries, marked by the emergence of new business models, the disruption of incumbents and the reshaping of production, consumption, transportation and delivery systems” observes Schwab (2014), in his most recent book, ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.

As he further explains: “We have yet to grasp fully the speed and breadth of this new revolution. Consider the unlimited possibilities of having billions of people connected by mobile devices, giving rise to unprecedented processing power, storage capabilities and knowledge access. Or think about the staggering confluence of emerging technology breakthroughs, covering wide-ranging fields such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, the internet of things (IoT), autonomous vehicles, 3D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage and quantum computing, to name a few.” (Schwab, 2014: 1)

Obviously the relevance of digitisation to Sri Lankan organisations is beyond doubt. In essence, the digital business transformation (DBT) is the conversion of operations from the industrial age to the information age. According to Jonston (2001), the model for creating business value has changed. Organisations today participate in extended supply chains, where real operational efficiency and revenue enhancement come from greater visibility, integration, and synchronisation among connected partners.

The DBT leadership challenge is about re-energising businesses that may already be successful to capture the full potential of information technology across the total supply chain. In essence, DBT is the conversion of business operations from Industrial-Age to Information-Age technology. It’s about reinventing and positioning business operations, processes, and relationships to fully exploit information technology.

People barriers for progress

As Bowerzox (2007) observes, the greatest barriers to a digital transformation are not technical or legal. Rather, they relate to prevailing managerial and employee attitudes, practices, and traditions around what constitutes best practice. Most acknowledged best practices were established decades ago using the technology then available to address problems or challenges that for the most part no longer exist. Actions that once were considered best practice are increasingly becoming unnecessary or obsolete. Yet it’s the perpetuation of these traditional practices that thwart significant breakthroughs toward new and more meaningful ways to work.

In order to overcome the people barriers, an organisation needs to understand the “hard” and “soft” aspects involved. In other words, two different and opposing elements appear to be in a constant state of flux. This is the nature of human resource management (HRM) in reality, where managing employee concerns as well as employer concerns need to take place in synergy and harmony.

The beauty of HRM is the meaningful co-existence of such a complex yet coherent whole. It is not only HR professionals but all other managers should be aware of such a harmony in order to maintain proper balance between achieving results and maintain relationships. This is increasingly becoming significant in the era of digitalisation.

From best practices to next practices

Digital business transformation is about significant change. It should be diligently driven by leadership. It is the ultimate challenge in change management because it impacts all organisational levels of an enterprise and its extended supply chain. The transformation starts with redefining the firm’s strategic vision—that is, the shared composite of goals, competencies, and capabilities a firm deploy to create and sustain competitive advantage.

At this early stage of the digital transformation, it’s clear that some organisations are having a tougher time getting started on the journey than others. For example it’s evident that A&P, Corning, Kodak, Motorola, Sears, and Xerox, to name a few, waited far too long to adapt to the digital imperative in both products and processes. Others, such as GM, Procter & Gamble, and IBM seem to be well on their way. In any case, one thing is clear: The digital business transformation is best initiated from a position of strength rather than weakness.


As Jonston and Whang (2002) point out, additional considerations in a seamless execution of DBT involve transitioning from traditional ideas about organisational structure. The traditional line-and-command, functionally focused organisational chart is replaced by an integrated supply chain structure built on shared values.

In order to have sustained digital business transformation, an organisation might need all of the four scenarios highlighted in the above model. However, charismatic transformation that includes a collaborative leadership style with a major scale of change would be the key requirement for sustained results.

As we have seen so far, one needs to be diligent in becoming digital. A comprehensive understanding on the key elements of the supply chain associated with one’s organisation is a must. Due consideration should be given to both hard and soft dimensions in managing people in ensuring an effective digital business transformation. It is heartening to see the Sri Lankan workplaces doing the ground work but overall, it is a long journey ahead.
Role for HR leaders 

The context of technology is a clear invitation to HR leaders to influence the organisational thinking and actions through their words and deeds. It challenges them to be “tech-savvy” whilst being “touch-savvy” in maintaining harmony. The NHRC 2017 will shed lots of light in this direction with multiple knowledge sharing sessions.

We brought you “In Search of HR Excellence” in 2013 with an overwhelming success. We hosted the largest even attended HR event of IPM in 2014 with the theme, ‘Redefining HR for Boosting Performance’. It further expanded with the theme ‘HR for National Prosperity’ in 2015. Last year, we zoomed into the aspect of competing as a nation in a global scale with the fitting theme, ‘HR Ecosystem for Competitiveness’. Now, the South Asia’s largest HR event is coming to you, more enhanced and enriched on 20 and 21 June as an engaging and energising experience. I have no doubt that it will generate immense insights, initiatives and implications in line with emergent HR leaders being high tech and high touch.

(Prof. Ajantha Dharmasiri can be reached through director@pim.sjp.ac.lk, president@ipmlk.org, ajantha@ou.edu or www.ajanthadharmasiri.info)

UNP MINISTER HAS CLAIMED RS. 10,000,000 FUEL BILL ON THE TOP OF A MONTHLY ALLOWANCE OF RS.175, 000


Image: Minister P. Harrison.

Sri Lanka Brief05/06/2017

The board of Directors of National Livestock Development Board (NLDB) had taken an unlawful board decision on January 31, 2017 to ‘develop’ the Rural Economic Development Minister P. Harrison personal economy by approving to settle a staggering fuel bill amounting to over one million rupees and a monthly fuel allowance of Rs.175, 000 in contrary to guidelines issued by the Department of Public Enterprises of the Finance Ministry.

Overruling Department of Public Enterprises guidelines on utilisation of enterprise resources, in the absence of three board members, Chairman NLDB, Prof. H.W. Cyril and two other Board Members A. Punchihewa and S. Weerasuriya have taken a board decision to grant covering approval to settle Rs. 1.059 million, the Minister and his staff had spent on fuel for their ‘visits’ to NLDB Farms between February 26, 2016 and January 13, 2017.

In addition, at the same board meeting the Board had decided to allocate a sum of Rs.175, 000 per month for fuel for the subject minister and his staffs’ visits to all NLDB farms in the country. The three board members who were not present at the board meeting in question was Deputy Chairman C.P. Palansuriya, Treasury representative A.G. Nishantha and K.K. Vasanje. Although all these three Directors were not present when this fraudulent decisions were taken, their failure to object even at later board meetings shows they too have given their consent to bypass Finance Ministry guidelines in order to be in good books with the subject minister.

However, questions have been raised as to why the Treasury representative A.G, Nishantha who is well aware of rules and regulations imposed by the Department of Public Enterprises and had been appointed to the Board to see whether financial irregularities are taking place, is silent on this erroneous board decision over the past several months and was trying to whitewash the decision taken when this newspaper questioned him last week.

Minister of Rural Economic Affairs, Anuradhapura District MP, P. Harrison who still criticises the members of the former regime for their involvement in many financial frauds, too has now come to the limelight for misusing public funds to pump fuel for his fleet of vehicles obtained unlawfully from the Ministry pool. According to circular CA/1/17/1 issued on May 14, 2010 by the Presidential Secretariat, every Minister or a Deputy Minister is entitled only for three vehicles for his/her and the security usage. By passing this circular, it is alleged Minister Harrison is using additional vehicles taken from the Rural Economic Ministry vehicle pool and pump fuel on the account of other departments that comes under his ministry.

According to the document evident this newspaper is in possession, a budgetary allocation of Rs.8, 000 million for fuel had been given to Rural Economic Affairs Minister and his personal staff for year 2016 although he had taken yet another Rs.1. 059 million from NLDB.

Highly reliable officials from the NLDB who wished to remain anonymous said that there are other departments that comes under the Rural Economic Development Ministry and said that if the Minister had obtained a ‘special’ fuel allocation from NLDB, he would have obtained more money for fuel from other departments as well.

The Board noted that the NLDB Has supplied fuel for the vehicles used by the Minister of Rural Economic Affairs and his staff for farm visits and the expenditure incurred in that regard from February 26, 2016 up to January 13, 2017 was Rs. 1, 059,275/ 50.

‘The Board whilst granting covering approval for the aforesaid expenditure, resolved to allocate a sum of Rs.175, 000 per month in respect of the expenditure to be incurred on fuel for the vehicles used by the Minister of Rural Economic Affairs and his staff on farm visits’.

This is contrary to Section 8.3.9 of the Department of Public Enterprises guidelines which clearly advices how to utilize enterprise resources. Section 8.3.9 of Department of Public Enterprises guidelines states as thus, ‘Public Enterprises are not permitted to incur expenditure or deploy its resources (including human resources) under any circumstances on behalf of the line Ministry or any other government institution.

By letter dated December 9, 2013, Additional Secretary (Finance and administration), Ministry of Livestock and Rural Community Development H.L. Tissera had instructed the then Chairman NLDB to supply fuel to the vehicles used by the Minster and his convoy during their official visists to Nuwara Eliya and Polonnaruwa. The letter further states as thus, ‘The Hon. Minister is expected to tour Nuwara Eliya on December 9, 2013 and Polonnaruwa on December 10, 2013. As the ministry is not able to supply fuel for the vehicles the Minister and his convoy is travelling, please make arrangements to supply fuel for these vehicles. Send the invoices to me to reimburse the money’.

All attempts taken to contact Tissera for a comment on his involvement in financial frauds during the previous regime and even under the good governance administration failed as there was no response from him.

When contacted Chairman National Livestock Development Board Prof. H.W. Cyril to find out as to why he disobeyed the guidelines of the Department of Public Enterprises, he said that it was the Rural Economic Affairs Minister who wanted him to pay money for the fuel and get it reimbursed from the Ministry and contradicting his own statement said it was the Ministry Secretary that instructed him to pay for Minister and his staff travelling costs for the farms and get it reimbursed.

Comments by Minister Harrision

Minister Harrison when contacted said that there is nothing wrong in allocating funds for his official vehicles as he visits NLDB farms all over the country very often. “Unlike during the previous regime when Minister Arumugam Thondaman had obtained millions of rupees from the NLDB illegally, the present board of directors allocated funds for fuel after getting board approval,” Minister Harrison said.

When asked whether he knows that the Department of Public Enterprises of the Finance Ministry in their guidelines had clearly stated that public enterprise are not permitted to incur expenditure on behalf of the line Ministry, Minister Harrison said that it is the Board of Directors who can take decisions but not any other Department. “No one can decide on what the institutions that comes under any ministry should follow. It becomes legal if the approvals are granted by the Board of Directors,” Harrison added.

Edited version  of a Sunday Leader article by Nirmala Kannangara.

SRI LANKA: A patient suffering from mental illness tortured by the Polpithigama Police


AHRC Logo

5 June 2017

Dear Friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission has received information regarding Mr. Rajapaksha Mudiyanselage Thilakoon Bandara, a resident of Kandubodagama, Ma-Eliya in the Kurunegala District, who has been tortured in detention after being illegally arrested by the Polpithigama Police. He has been charged with a fabricated offence and produced before the Mahawa Magistrates’ Court. Bandara alleges that police officers at the Polpithigama police station have behaved in an unlawful manner in the entire process of apprehension, arrest, detention, torture and fabricating false charges on an innocent man without any reason whatsoever. Bandara and his family demand justice for the illegal actions on the part of the police in violating his rights and demands justice and reparation.
Case Narrative:

Mr. Rajapaksha Mudiyanselage Thilakoon Bandara, 48 years of age, has been suffering from a mental illness for a prolonged time. He is a bachelor and lives with his sisters in their parental home in MaEliya in the Kurunegala District. Bandara engages in daily paid labour work in farming and agriculture in the village by which means he assists the household. According to relatives and neighbours’ he is a peaceful man and many in the village give him special care and attention given his ailment. He has no record of unruly behavior and has led an exemplary and peaceful life and has no criminal record.

On 2nd January 2017, he has been engaged in some work for a neighbor. After work when he was returning home Bandara has noticed a police officer approaching on a motorbike. Bandara had greeted the officer in usual manner and allowed the officer to pass him on the road. At this moment the officer has stopped the motorbike and approached Bandara on foot. Seeing the police officer approach, Bandara in sudden panic and fear, had started to run away from the approaching police officer. However, the police officer gave chase, and caught up with Bandara. No sooner the police officer caught hold of Bandara he had slapped his face hard, twice, and kicked him twice in his back. Bandara not knowing what to do had tried hard to yell out, for help and after a struggle had surrendered to the police officer. Following the scuffle, Bandara had been forcibly brought to the Polpithigama Police Station by the said police officer.

At the police station, Bandara recalls being detained inside a holding cell, for detainees. Bandara says he was not informed of the reason for his arrest at the time of arrest or at any time during detention. The officer who arrested him had later approached him and asked him whether he was under the influence of alcohol to which Bandara replied in the negative. He states that he was never made to undergo the alcohol consumption tests.

Later that night Bandara learnt that a neighbor, Jeevan was also brought to the police station by the police officer and several hours later into the night, he learnt that his own brother had visited the police station and demanded that Bandara be released. However, the officer on duty had vehemently opposed his brother’s demands and had tortured his brother, instead. His brother, who had arrived at the police station to obtain Bandara’s release, had then been detained in a holding cell in the police station overnight.

In the evening, of 3 January 2017, Bandara, his brother and the other detainee Jeevan have been brought to the Mahawa Magistrates’ Court and produced before the Magistrate who had granted them bail. Bandara had learnt that police have filed a case against him on a false charge of theft of a motor pump under case number B/14/2017. Bandara vehemently denies all such accusations. His family and relatives state that Bandara is a peace loving citizen and a patient and was never engaged in committing any such alleged neither theft nor any other crime. They further state that being a small village community, this is the first instance they came to know of the alleged theft of a motor pump and never heard of any water pump being stolen in that area. They allege that the police simply fabricated the charge against Bandara to cover up the brutal assault and the acts of torture by the police. They demand justice and reparation for the gross violation of their rights at the hands of the police officers attached to the Polpithigama Police.

Suggested Action:

Please send a letter to the authorities listed below and express your concern about this incident. Please request an immediate investigation into the allegations of abuse of an innocent person suffering from a mental illness, by the officer of the Polpithigama Police, and call for the prosecution of those found responsible. The officers involved must be subjected to internal investigations for breach of Police Departmental Orders. Kindly request the National Police Commission, and the Inspector General of Police to commence with immediate effect, a special investigation into the malpractices of those officers who abused their powers. Please note that the AHRC has written separate letters to the United Nations Chairperson of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and to the UN Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, in this regard.
To support this case, please click here:
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear ________,
SRI LANKA: A patient suffering from mental illness tortured by the Polpithigama Police
Name of Victims: Mr. Rajapaksha Mudiyanselage Thilakkoon Bandara (48) of Kandubodagama, Ma-Eliya in Kurunegala District
Alleged perpetrators: OIC and officers attached to the Polpithigama Police Station
Date of incident: 2 January 2017
Place of incident: Polpithigama Police Division

According to the information I have received Mr. Mr. Rajapaksha Mudiyanselage Thilakoon Bandara, 48 years of age, has been suffering from a mental illness for a prolonged time. He is a bachelor and lives with his sisters in their parental home in MaEliya in the Kurunegala District. Bandara engages in daily paid labour work in farming and agriculture in the village by which means he assists the household. According to relatives and neighbours’ he is a peaceful man and many in the village give him special care and attention given his ailment. He has no record of unruly behavior and has led an exemplary and peaceful life and has no criminal record.

On 2nd January 2017, he has been engaged in some work for a neighbor. After work when he was returning home Bandara has noticed a police officer approaching on a motorbike. Bandara had greeted the officer in usual manner and allowed the officer to pass him on the road. At this moment the officer has stopped the motorbike and approached Bandara on foot. Seeing the police officer approach, Bandara in sudden panic and fear, had started to run away from the approaching police officer. However, the police officer gave chase, and caught up with Bandara. No sooner the police officer caught hold of Bandara he had slapped his face hard, twice, and kicked him twice in his back. Bandara not knowing what to do had tried hard to yell out, for help and after a struggle had surrendered to the police officer. Following the scuffle, Bandara had been forcibly brought to the Polpithigama Police Station by the said police officer.

At the police station, Bandara recalls being detained inside a holding cell, for detainees. Bandara says he was not informed of the reason for his arrest at the time of arrest or at any time during detention. The officer who arrested him had later approached him and asked him whether he was under the influence of alcohol to which Bandara replied in the negative. He states that he was never made to undergo the alcohol consumption tests.

Later that night Bandara learnt that a neighbor, Jeevan was also brought to the police station by the police officer and several hours later into the night, he learnt that his own brother had visited the police station and demanded that Bandara be released. However, the officer on duty had vehemently opposed his brother’s demands and had tortured his brother, instead. His brother, who had arrived at the police station to obtain Bandara’s release, had then been detained in a holding cell in the police station overnight.

In the evening, of 3 January 2017, Bandara, his brother and the other detainee Jeevan have been brought to the Mahawa Magistrates’ Court and produced before the Magistrate who had granted them bail. Bandara had learnt that police have filed a case against him on a false charge of theft of a motor pump under case number B/14/2017. Bandara vehemently denies all such accusations. His family and relatives state that Bandara is a peace loving citizen and a patient and was never engaged in committing any such alleged theft nor any other crime. They further state that being a small village community, this is the first instance they came to know of the alleged theft of a motor pump and never heard of any water pump being stolen in that area. They allege that the police simply fabricated the charge against Bandara to cover up the brutal assault and the acts of torture by the police. They demand justice and reparation for the gross violation of their rights at the hands of the police officers attached to the Polpithigama Police.

I request the intervention of your good offices to ensure that the authorities listed below open an immediate investigation into this incident. They need to look into the allegations of violations of fundamental rights of the victim by officers of the Sri Lanka Police Department. Any officers involved should be subject to an internal investigation for breach of Police Departmental orders.
Yours sincerely,
---------------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
1. Mr. PujithJayasundara
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877
E-mail: igp@police.lk
2. Mr. Jayantha Jayasooriya PC
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk
3. Secretary
National Police Commission
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers
109 Galle Road
Colombo 03
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 395310
Fax: +94 11 2 395867
E-mail: npcgen@sltnet.lk or polcom@sltnet.lk
4. Secretary
Human Rights Commission
No. 36, Kynsey Road
Colombo 8
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk
Thank you.

India: After Years in Jail, Sri Lankan Set Free

Following press release issued by the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative ( CHRI), an independent, non-partisan, international non-governmental organisation, mandated to ensure the practical realisation of human rights in the countries of the Commonwealth. 
( June 6, 2017, Alwar/New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) A 66 year old Sri Lankan national who spent 4 years in jail waiting for the completion of bureaucratic formalities, left for home a free man today ( Jun 5, 2017).
Rocky D’Souza, who said he came to India in 2000 for business was prosecuted for overstaying his visa period and completed his sentence on 3rd May, 2013.
His release was possible after an intervention by CHRI and collaboration with the Sri Lankan Embassy in New Delhi, the Alwar Detention Centre in Rajasthan and the Ministry of External Affairs. CHRI has followed this case since August, 2016 and facilitated the process by pressing on the authorities to provide the relevant documents and travel tickets necessary for his return. This was issued in May, 2017. With only an incomplete mobile number and no address, tracing his place of origin and his family members was a challenging task.
When informed of his release, Rocky expressed gratitude and said he “wanted to return to Colombo to help his mother settle a family property dispute.”
Rocky’s detention, for the four years, like that of many others, was illegal. Had procedural requirements such as prompt nationality verification and consular access at the time of detention been complied with, his wait for freedom would not have been delayed. His case highlights the lacuna that exists in the policy for foreign national prisoners, which leads to unnecessary complications in the repatriation process.
Ms. Sanghmitra Singh, Project Officer with CHRI’s Access to Justice (Prison Reforms) Programme who worked on this case says, “Unless the Indian Government develops a time-bound legislation or guidelines for repatriation, there will continue to be such cases of unjust, prolonged detention.”
CHRI Director, Sanjoy Hazarika says that such cases highlight the problem faced by foreign national prisoners in India. He said that “Civil society organisations have to work together in collaboration with the relevant stakeholders to bring freedom to such prisoners”.

RDA estimates road repairs post-floods to cost Rs. 8 bn


RDA estimates road repairs post-floods to cost Rs. 8 bn

Jun 05, 2017
The Road Development Authority (RDA) has estimated that it will have to spend as much as eight billion rupees to repair the roads damaged in the floods, officials said.
RDA Chairman N. R, Sooriyarachchi told Daily Mirror that this estimate included the damage caused to A and B Grade highways coming under its purview.“We will need about eight billion rupees for the reconstruction of damaged stretches of highway. This is what is needed to build slope protections,” he said.
He added that the National Building Research Organization (NBRO) had been entrusted with the task of identifying vulnerable areas that needed immediate attention.
Source: http://www.dailymirror.lk/

Reconciliation turning fragrant !Students of North gift school equipments to Southern students who are flood victims- Major General helps

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News - 05.June.2017, 4.30PM)  With reconciliation and camaraderie as their goals , a group of students  of the Jaffna University arrived in Colombo on the 2 nd , to gift stationeries and school equipments purchased by them to 400 students of Kukule Ganga,  Molkawa Maha Vidyalaya , who fell victims to the recent floods. 
These students who came to Colombo to demonstrate  their magnanimity informed the chief of staff of the army and former Jaffna security Corps commander Major General Mahesh Senanayake about their objective. Thereafter Major Senanayake organized and helped them to buy the stationeries and equipments.
The students then with the assistance of the army purchased stationeries and equipments for about Rs. 500,000.00 which they had collected while in Jaffna  to be distributed among 400 students in grades one to 13.Thereafter , the group arrived in Kukule ganga district , and gifted the school equipments to the students of Molkawa Maha Vidyalaya in an environment of camaraderie and bonhomie.

The Jaffna students were provided with board ,  lodging and transport facilities by Major General Senanayake with the assistance of the special force of the headquarters . Sri Lankan peace keeping operations training (IPSOTSL) commandant of Kokule , and Battalion Commanding officer of Kokule who is due to leave for Lebanon shortly to take up peace keeping  duties  rendered the necessary support.
---------------------------
by     (2017-06-05 11:19:11)

Indo-Chinese Aid: Compassionate Reward Or Concealed Warning From Competing Masters?

logo
Dr. Ameer Ali
Shiploads of relief supplies coming at first from India immediately followed by China is a much wanted and timely help to the Sri Lankan victims of the latest natural disaster. However, the question must be raised whether the help is entirely altruistically motivated or tinged with a hidden price.
In the geopolitics surrounding the Indian Ocean Sri Lanka is caught in a painful dilemma. Before the 1970s when India and China were not openly engaged in any regional power contest Sri Lanka was able to navigate its diplomatic ship quite smoothly through the turbulent waters of the Cold War. In the 1960s and 1970s India’s and Sri Lanka’s diplomatic and economic alignment with the Soviet regime, in spite of Nehruvian non-alignment and widening rift between Moscow and Peking, did not create any special problem.
The 1980s however proved a dramatic turning point. The disappearance of the Soviet super power, Jayawardena’s total surrender to U.S’ economic regimen and global hegemony, the rapid emergence of China and India as the two rivalling regional economic giants, and because of these developments the transformation of the Indian Ocean into the main theatre of geopolitical contest between the U.S-India alliance on the one hand and China on the other have made Sri Lanka’s strategic position in the ocean more crucial than ever. All three contestants who wanted to dominate the Indian Ocean want to have a strong foothold in Sri Lanka. Robert Kaplan, a Washington based security analyst, has delved into this emerging contest* quite perceptively.
Sri Lanka’s strategic location in the Indian Ocean provides a golden opportunity to play one power against the other and maximize the pay-off. But such a game also carries a potential danger of antagonising both players and losing everything. Until now, may be because the geopolitical temperature in the Indian Ocean is cool, the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe regime appears to be managing the balancing act fairly successfully. India’s and China’s competitive rush to aid the national effort in healing the wounds inflicted by the natural disaster is a reflection of this success. However, it is a very delicate game. When the temperature gets heated Sri Lanka’s position will be quite problematic.
Sri Lanka’s close proximity to India, the cultural affinity between the two countries, and the presence of a significant naturalized Indian-Tamil enclave in the island are factors that compel a close friendship with India. The covert support that Delhi lent to the Sri Lankan government in the war against LTTE amidst a strong pro-LTTE political lobby in Tamil Nadu further strengthened this friendly relationship.
On the other hand, China is thousands of miles away from Sri Lanka. Although distance is not a significant barrier in today’s world of ultra-rapid transport and communication’ yet, when relations turn from cool to hot between the two rivalling regional powers, India will certainly have an edge over China in reaching the shores of the island. China’s entry into Hambantota as part of its ‘string of pearls’ strategy is partly to offset the disadvantage of distance and partly to protect China’s oceanic trade route that transports her resources and commodities.
Already, China’s flexing of muscle in the Asia Pacific region by creating and militarizing artificial islands together with her muted response to North Korea’s provocative launching of ballistic missiles has alarmed the U.S. and her Western allies. It is to counter the rise of China that U.S. has rushed to strengthen its friendship with India to the open disgust of her long term ally Pakistan. U.S. would wish India to play a crucial role in checkmating China in the Indian Ocean. Even with or without U.S’ friendship India will not surrender its dominance over the Indian Ocean at any cost. K. M. Panikkar, one of that country’s eminent historian and an essayist spelt out with great perspicacity the dictum in 1935 and said: “While to other countries, the Indian Ocean is only one of the important oceanic areas, to India it is the vital sea. Her life lines are concentrated in that area. Her future is dependent on the freedom of that vast water surface. No industrial development, no commercial growth, no stable political structure is possible for her unless the Indian Ocean is free and her two shores fully protected. The Indian Ocean must remain fully Indian.”** This fundamental philosophy has been assiduously followed by all successive Indian governments. It was developed later by some Indian nationalists in their imperialist to be part of a program of Indian colonisation of certain parts of Asia, notably Sri Lanka and Malaya***.

One of the critical assets that Sri Lanka possesses is the Trincomalee harbour. Oceanographic engineers have found that anything hidden by anyone beneath its waters whether it is a toy or a nuclear submarine is undetectable by another. This is why there is such a haste to get access to this harbour by rivalling outside powers. The triangular contest among U.S., India and China to have some access to this natural harbour foretells how Sri Lanka would become entangled in a geopolitical rivalry which will eventually jeopardise her national sovereignty. Any deal by any Sri Lankan government with any outside power that would compromise the neutrality of Trincomalee would be suicidal; but to maintain that neutrality under any pressure requires the diplomatic talent and skill of a super Kautilya.

Read More

Environment destruction continues despite days dedicated to protect it! – Vedda chief

Environment destruction continues despite days dedicated to protect it! – Vedda chief

Jun 06, 2017

The continuous environment destruction is the only thing visible despite dedicating specific days to emphasise its importance, said Vedda chief Uruwarige Vannila Aththo, the leader of the Dambana indigenous people.
He emphasized the need of strict rules to protect the nature. Vannila Aththo expressed his view in his address as the chief guest of the Environment day commemoration programme organised by the primary division of the Vidyartha College, Kandy.
He stressed that since the ministerial position to protect the nature is with the President there are more possibilities to tighten the law against those who destroy the environment.
“It is difficult to enlighten the adults about the importance of protecting the nature. Therefore it is best to educate the children on these issues,” he added.
“I have been attending environment day events for the past 19 years as the leader of the indigenous people. Certain events were only for that day. But I’m glad to see that children of this school has done many things to conserve the environment,” said Vanniala Aththo.
And he stressed that protecting and conserving the environment has always been in the hearts and minds of the indigenous population of this country. “One cannot protect the environment unless you start some kind of fondness towards it. Organising events on the specific day alone would not serve the purpose,” he emphasized.
Principal of Vidyartha College Colonel Ranjith Rajapaksa, sectional heads, teachers, members of the Old Boys Association, students and parents participated the event. To commemorate the day a tree planting event was organized.
Connecting people to nature: Importance of knowing Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGSs) 


logoMonday, 5 June 2017
0399
Introduction

World Environment Day provides a perfect platform to reflect on our environment and initiate actions that would drive sustainable solutions for major environmental issues of the world. This year the theme is ‘Connecting People to Nature’. As suggested by many environmental experts scientific advances as well as growing environmental problems such as global warming are helping us to understand the countless ways in which natural systems support our own prosperity and well being.

Monday, June 5, 2017

Israel’s Tzipi Livni faces Swiss war crimes probe

War crimes suspect and former Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni, left, with PLO chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, at the World Economic Forum in Jordan, 20 May.
 Muhammad HamedReuters
Ali Abunimah-5 June 2017
Switzerland’s top prosecutor is investigating former Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni for war crimes.
The Office of the Attorney General confirmed to Swiss media that it is examining a complaint brought against Livni in relation to “Operation Cast Lead” – Israel’s assault on Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009 that killed more than 1,400 Palestinians.
The complaint was lodged by the Palestinian rights advocacy group Collectif Urgence Palestine in Geneva when it learned that Livni planned to enter the country.
According to the publication swissinfo.ch, Livni visited the city of Lugano for a pro-Israel event on 28 May and left the following day to Italy.
“It is unclear what action the attorney general’s office will take action in the future, especially if Livni plans to return to Switzerland,” swissinfo.ch added.
“Switzerland has an obligation to work on cases of alleged war crimes if the suspect steps on Swiss territory,” a spokesperson for the nongovernmental group Trial International, which fights impunity against war crimes, told swissinfo.ch. “If Switzerland opens an investigation, it is in line with Swiss law, especially given the alleged crimes committed during Operation Cast Lead.”

“Real hooliganism”

In January, Livni canceled a visit to Brussels. Belgian prosecutors confirmed they wanted to use her planned visit to question her in an ongoing war crimes investigation.
Livni is the subject of a complaint by Palestinian victims filed in Brussels in 2010 for war crimes during the 2008-2009 assault.
She was foreign minister in the Israeli government that ordered the attack, and by her own account a full participant in planning it.
Livni told Israeli media in January 2009: “Israel demonstrated real hooliganism during the course of the recent operation, which I demanded.”
The Goldstone Report, the independent UN-commissioned inquiry into the assault, also quotes Livni stating: “Israel is not a country upon which you fire missiles and it does not respond. It is a country that when you fire on its citizens it responds by going wild – and this is a good thing.”
Israel claims that the assault on Gaza was a response to missiles fired by Palestinian armed groups, but the Israeli government’s own chronology shows that an agreed ceasefire that had been effective for months only collapsed after Israel broke it by launching several deadly attacks on Gaza in early November 2008.
It then carried out its major assault on Gaza that had been in the works for six months.

Complicity

Independent judicial authorities in several countries have initiated legal examinations of potential war crimes by Israelis, but political pressure and interference has often thwarted victims’ further pursuit of justice.
While Livni is still being pursued for war crimes by her victims, various Arab regimes have continued to maintain warm relationships with her, including senior figures in the Saudi hierarchy.
In May, the activist group Jordan BDS strongly criticized the Jordanian government’s complicity for allowing Livni to participate in a conference in the country.
Jordan BDS said the government showed “blatant disregard for the public will” by allowing the “war criminal Tzipi Livni” to travel to Jordan.
At a time when hundreds of Palestinian prisoners were on a hunger strike in Israeli prisons that had lasted more than a month, Livni took the stage at the World Economic Forum at the Dead Sea, alongside Palestine Liberation Organization chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, to talk about “peace.”

Syrian army plane downed near Damascus say rebels


Rebels say they hit the aircraft with anti-aircraft machine guns which had been delivered to them in recent weeks by the US
Syrian air force Russian-made MiG-21 plane that a pilot landed within the King Hussein military base in Mafraq in northern Jordan on 21 June 2012 (AFP)
Reuters-Monday 5 June 2017

Two Syrian rebels and a war monitor said a Syrian military plane had come down about 50km east of Damascus on Monday in rebel-held territory near a frontline with the government-held area.
"We have brought down a Syrian jet in Tel Dakwa area in rural Damasus and we are searching for the pilot," Saad al-Haj, spokesman for Western-backed Jaish Osoud Al Sharqiya rebel group, told Reuters. Osoud Al Sharqiya is one of the main groups fighting in the south-east Syrian desert, known as the Badia.
Footage of Syrian Jet that has been Shot down by US Backed FSA Rebel Component Jaysh Usood al-Sharqiya in East Qalamoun Desert Region.
Rebels said they hit the aircraft with heavy, anti-aircraft machine guns which had been delivered to them in recent weeks by the United States.
Pictures of what appeared to be the human remains of the pilot have been shared on opposition social media sites alongside pictures of aircraft wreckage said to be that of the warplane.
Another rebel official, Said Seif from the Western-vetted Ahmed Abdo Martyrs group that operates in the area, said the plane came down in an area 15 km east of Bir Qasab between Tal Dakwa and Dumair airport.
Seif said rebels hit the aircraft with anti-aircraft guns which had been delivered to them by the US and its allies to fend off a new push into south-east Syria by the government and allied Iran-backed militias.
The Syrian military could not be reached for comment at the time of writing. 
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights war monitor said a plane was shot down by a rebel group in the area but it could not confirm if the pilot was dead or alive.
Reuters could not independently confirm reports of the downed plane.

Why Did Several Arab Countries Suddenly Cut Ties With Qatar?

Why Did Several Arab Countries Suddenly Cut Ties With Qatar?


No automatic alt text available.BY EMILY TAMKINROBBIE GRAMER-JUNE 5, 2017 - 12:38 PM

Five Arab countries — six if you count one of Libya’s rival governments — suddenly cut diplomatic relations with Qatar, accusing the small Gulf state of backing militant groups including the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, a move that could potentially complicate the U.S.-led coalition against terrorist groups.

Saudi Arabia and Bahrain first cut ties on Monday morning. Egypt, Yemen,Libya’s interim government, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), encouraged by Saudi authorities to do the same, quickly followed suit, preparing to expel diplomats, close off borders, and institute a travel ban on flights to and from the country. Kuwait and Oman are the only Gulf Cooperation Council members retaining ties.

The tiff is ostensibly over Qatar’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood — which the Egyptian government considers a terrorist organization — and Al Jazeera, a Qatari media network often critical of Saudi and Egyptian authorities. But tensions have been simmering between Qatar and its neighbors for years, primarily over Qatar’s open conduit with Iran, Riyadh’s geopolitical archrival.

Those tensions boiled over in recent weeks. Gulf allies blocked Al Jazeera after Qatari emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani allegedly criticized Saudi Arabia on state media outlets while calling for improved ties with Iran. Nonsense, Qatar said: Those comments were fake. According to Doha, Qatar News Agency, which disseminated Thani’s remarks, had been hacked.

In a statement, the Qatari foreign ministry expressed “deep regret” over the move by its neighbors to sever ties and to close its borders. The statement described the moves as  “unjustified” and “based on baseless and unfounded allegations.”

The embassies of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain, and the UAE did not immediately respond to request for comment.

There seemed to be a sixth country cutting ties with Qatar, after reports emerged that the Libyan government had also done so. But the Libyan Embassy in Washington clarified that the interim government in eastern Libya cut ties with Qatar; the internationally-recognized U.N.-brokered Government of National Accord has not.

The move comes as a Saudi-led coalition, including Qatar, is fighting Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen in a deadly conflict widely seen as a proxy war between Riyadh and Tehran. Saudi Arabia announced it would remove Qatari troops from the coalition fighting the war as accusations mount that Qatar is quietly backing Iran’s regional agenda.

Saudi Arabia accused Qatar of financing extremists and “supporting the activities of Iranian-backed terrorist groups in the governorate of Qatif of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Kingdom of Bahrain,” in a statement Monday.

Saudi Arabia itself has come under fire for financing and exporting extremism. In fact, after Saturday’s terror attack in London, calls came from the United Kingdom’s Labour and Liberal Democrat parties for the British government to allow for a “sensitive” government report to be published. That report is thought to focus on the role Saudis play in funding terror groups and propaganda.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, speaking in Australia, said the diplomatic row wouldn’t impact the ongoing war against the Islamic State; Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Libya, and Egypt are all members of the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

“I do not expect that this will have any significant impact, if any impact at all, on the unified — the unified — fight against terrorism in the region or globally,” he told reporters in Sydney after a summit with the Australian foreign and defense ministers.

“We certainly would encourage the parties to sit down together and address these differences,” he added.

Secretary of Defense James Mattis also said he did not believe the move would have implications for the fight against the Islamic State. Trump’s efforts to ramp up the fight against terror have focused on bringing Arab countries, and especially the Gulf states, closer together.

Tensions in the Gulf could be a headache for the Pentagon. Qatar and its neighbors are key to the U.S. military footprint in the Middle East. Qatar hosts the Al Udeid air base, from which the U.S. launches airstrikes against the Islamic State. Bahrain hosts the U.S. Fifth Fleet, which patrols the wider Middle East and parts of the Indian Ocean.

And while the diplomatic snafu on Monday seemed to come suddenly, there have been hints of aggravation with Qatar’s seemingly cozy relations with Iran and with terror groups. In March 2016, Qatar sought to buy U.S. warplanes — but got a cold reception from the Obama administration.
FP’s Elias Groll contributed to this piece.

Photo credit: STRINGER/AFP/Getty Images