Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, May 28, 2017











Charlotte Silver-24 May 2017

A US federal court in New York court has ruled that Facebook cannot be held liable for its users’ activity.
Israeli lawfare group Shurat HaDin filed a $1 billion lawsuit last July, alleging that Facebook violates the Anti-Terrorism Act by serving as a platform for Hamas and “knowingly … facilitat[ing] this terrorist group’s ability to communicate, recruit members, plan and carry out attacks and strike fear in its enemies.”
Shurat HaDin has strong links to Israel’s Mossad spy agency.
In dismissing the case on 18 May, US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis upheld Facebook’s argument that the company was protected by the Communications Decency Act, which says certain internet services are not liable for content created by a third party.
The immunity this law extends to Facebook is based on the idea that such internet companies are not the publishers or speakers of the content under question, and therefore cannot be held liable for its alleged harm.

New legal strategy fails

Shurat HaDin’s case was filed on behalf of the American families of five individuals who died – and in one case survived – in attacks allegedly carried out by Hamas.
The case was among the first to invoke the Anti-Terrorism Act to argue that an internet company is liable for its users’ activity.
The Anti-Terrorism Act allows US citizens to file civil suits against organizations and people accused of providing material support to groups designated as “foreign terrorist organizations” by the US government.
In order to invoke the law, plaintiffs must show that the alleged material support was in the service of a designated terrorist group. The US designated Hamas as a terrorist organization in the 1990s.

Earlier lawsuit also dismissed

In the same ruling, Judge Garaufis also dismissed an earlier lawsuit filed by Shurat HaDin in 2015 on behalf of 20,000 Israelis, who claimed they were threatened by potential violence that was being planned or incited on Facebook.
The court dismissed this lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to establish an actual injury that could be connected to Facebook’s conduct.
Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, the founder of Shurat HaDin, said her group will appeal the ruling.
“We believe there is a fatal mistake in their ruling because the court totally did not address the issue of aiding and abetting terrorism,” she said following the ruling last week.
In its lawsuit, Shurat HaDin claimed Facebook’s approach to regulating content was inconsistent and piecemeal, arguing that Hamas should not be allowed to operate any pages on Facebook.

Censorship concerns

Facebook has been the target of an intense campaign by the Israeli government. Last year, public security minister Gilad Erdan charged that the blood of Israelis killed by Palestinians in violence related to Israel’s military occupation in the West Bank is “on the hands of Facebook.”
Along with its lawsuits, Shurat HaDin sponsored a campaign, which included plans for a billboard opposite Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s home, personally implicating him in conflict-related deaths.
Over the weekend, The Guardian published leaked information on how Facebook monitors and censors activity on its social media platform. The exposé portrays the company as struggling to implement consistent censorship rules for categories of content that can be hard to define, including so-called terrorism, pornography and threats of violence.
The Guardian’s report suggests “terrorism” is one of the trickiest topics for Facebook to monitor.
The company has been accused of censoring political activity, especially by Palestinians and Kashmiris, in the name of clamping down on terrorist recruitment and propaganda.
Facebook has defended its censorship of content related to Kashmir, where the Indian government is waging a brutal military campaign against protesters, by stating: “There is no place on Facebook for content that praises or supports terrorists, terrorist organizations or terrorism.”
Facebook is reportedly developing an artificial intelligence mechanism “to distinguish between news stories about terrorism and actual terrorist propaganda.”
Following Trump’s trip, Merkel says Europe can’t rely on ‘others.’ She means the U.S.

 After recent summits, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said May 28 that Europe must take its fate into its own hands. (Reuters)


German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Sunday declared a new chapter in U.S.-European relations after contentious meetings with President Trump last week, saying that Europe “really must take our fate into our own hands.”

Offering a tough review in the wake of Trump’s trip to visit E.U., NATO and Group of Seven leaders last week, Merkel told a packed Bavarian beer hall rally that the days when Europe could rely on others was “over to a certain extent. This is what I have experienced in the last few days.”

It was a stark declaration from the leader of Europe’s most powerful economy, and a grim take on the transatlantic ties that have underpinned Western security in the generations since World War II. Although relations between Washington and Europe have been strained during periods since 1945, before Trump there has rarely been such a strong feeling from European leaders that they must turn away from Washington and prepare to face the world alone.

Merkel said that Europe’s need to go it alone should be done “of course in friendship with the United States of America, in friendship with Great Britain and as good neighbors wherever that works.”
But it was a clear repudiation of Trump’s troubled few days with European leaders, even as she held back from mentioning the U.S. president by name. On Thursday, Trump had stern words for German trade behind closed doors. Hours later, he blasted European leaders at NATO for failing to spend enough on defense, while holding back from offering an unconditional guarantee for European security. Then, at the Group of Seven summit of leaders of major world economies on Friday and Saturday, he refused to endorse the Paris agreements on combating climate change, punting a decision until next week.

Merkel’s comments were similar to some she made shortly after Trump’s November election. But they carry extra heft now that Trump is actually in office – and after Trump had a days-long opportunity to reset relations with Washington’s closest allies. Instead, by most European accounts he strained them even more.

Trump – who returned from his nine-day international trip on Saturday – had a different take.
“Just returned from Europe. Trip was a great success for America. Hard work but big results!” Trump wrote on Sunday, reviving a prolific Twitter habit that had slackened during his days on the road.

But many European leaders emerged from their meetings with Trump filled with fresh worry that an earthquake truly had hit transatlantic relations. Trump was far more solicitous toward the autocratic king of Saudi Arabia earlier in the week, telling him and other leaders of Muslim-majority countries – many of them not democratically elected – that he was not “here to lecture.” Days later in Brussels he offered a scathing assessment of Washington’s closest allies, saying they were being “unfair” to American taxpayers.

“The belief in shared values has been shattered by the Trump administration,” said Stephan Bierling, an expert on transatlantic relations at Germany’s University of Regensburg. “After the inauguration, everyone in Europe was hopeful that Trump would become more moderate and take into account the positions of the G-7 and of NATO. But the opposite has happened. It’s as if he is still trying to win a campaign.”

The United States remains the largest economy in the world, and its military is indispensable for European security, putting a clear limit on Europe’s ability to declare independence. American consumers also form an important market for European products – including the German BMWs that Trump complained about in closed-door meetings in Brussels, according to German press accounts.

But Merkel has expressed willingness to jolt her nation’s military spending upwards, a first step both to answering American criticism that it falls far short of NATO pledges and to lessening its dependence on the U.S. security blanket. Germany hiked its military spending by $2.2 billion this year, to $41 billion, but it remains far from being able to stand on its own militarily.

Trump’s Sojourn In Saudi Arabia

logo
Dr. Ameer Ali
The richest and the most enigmatic U.S. President, Donald Trump, has triumphantly concluded his visit to an equally rich and the most conservative Arab kingdom, Saudi Arabia. It is little over seventy-two years since President Roosevelt met King Abdul Aziz of the desert kingdom on board the ship USS Quincy on 14 February 1945 on the former’s return from the Yalta conference. Since then oil and armaments, the life blood of modern geopolitics, has made the U.S – Saudi connection rock solid.
From the point of view of the super power Saudi oil has lost its strategic importance because of conservation measures, efficiency of usage and availability of alternative sources of supply. The world has learned to cope with future oil shortages. Yet, the need to sell weapons to keep turning the wheels of U.S military-industrial complex has not saturated. Trump’s successful arms deal with the Saudi regime worth $110 billion may be his crowning achievement so far. Do the Saudis actually need these weapons is a question neither party would wish to entertain. But was that all the purpose of the visit? What did the President offer in return to this lucrative deal?
It is worth recalling that in 2008, King Abdallah wanted the U.S. to “cut off the head of the snake”, by which he meant Iran. The Obama administration was wise enough to realise the strategic value of a friendly Iran and took the opposite route of doing a deal with that country that disappointed not only the Saudis but also the Israelis. With Trump in office now the Saudis have found a friend who could fulfil their wish. Yet, it may not that be easy.
On the question of “draining the swamp of extremism” the unpredictable Saudi foreign minister Abdel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir and the equally unpredictable President Trump are on the same side. However, one is not sure whether they agree on the definition of extremism and the identification of extremists.
Saudi Arabian foreign minister’s misadventure in Yemen with military assistance from the U.S. has so far ended in unmitigated disaster and has caused an unimaginable humanitarian crisis. The Yemeni war is still continuing without an end in sight. His second misadventure, once again with U.S agreement, was in Syria aiming to topple Assad’s Alawite regime, which only ended in dragging Russia into the battle field to make matters worse. The West’s historic effort to keep Russian warships out of the Mediterranean waters has at last come to naught.
In both these disasters the apparent victor was Shiite Iran and it was in targeting Iran that Trump and Saudi Arabia are in collusion. However, tackling Iran will be more problematic than it looks. It may become the third Saudi-U.S. misadventure.
Iran will not be a walk over to the U.S-Saudi forces like Saddam Hussain’s Iraq or Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. Besides, there is another element that makes Iran problematic and that is the role of ISIS. Trump wants to destroy ISIS but ISIS wants to kill the Shiites and topple the Iran-backed Iraqi government as well as Assad’s regime in Syria, both to the delight of Sunni Saudis. In fact, ISIS is also playing a useful role to another U.S ally Turkey by targeting and killing the Kurdish army. Above all Israel would also prefer ISIS to survive because the latter is also the enemy of Hezbollah. As the saying goes, one’s enemy’s enemy is one’s friend. All this makes ISIS an important asset in the fight against Iran at least to the Saudis.

It is astonishing to realise how on earth does ISIS keep fighting over the last four years and remaining resilient against the combined might of the U.S – Turkey – Russia- Syria weaponry. Who is supplying them with weapons? What is the role of the Gulf regimes, another ally of U.S., in this power-play? The picture is too messy and the questions are rather irksome.
Again, how can Trump and his Saudi partners talk of Islamic extremism without even mentioning the Wahhabi-Salafist ideology of Saudi Arabia? Isn’t that ideology that produced Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, Jamaa’ Islamiyya, the Taliban and even the ISIS in the first place? It was the U.S. that gave a free licence to this ideology to spread even within its own borders simply to counter the spread of Khomeinism. Today the Wahhabi-Salafist ideology has gained global currency through the social media. May be President Trump and his expert advisors do not want to know about this growing ideological phenomenon whose latest demonstration is the Manchester Massacre.

Read More

Syria Has Effectively Ceased to Exist

With Russians and Iranians in control in Damascus, the U.S. bolstering rebels, and no one powerful enough to press for unification, the breakup of Syria is a fait accompli.
Syria Has Effectively Ceased to Exist
No automatic alt text available.
DAMASCUS, Syria — On my last night in Damascus, some younger members of the Information Ministry-sponsored delegation in which I was taking part decided to have a drink. It was late April, and the bars and restaurants were doing good business in the cool and breezy evenings. An inebriated Russian journalist, accompanied by a uniformed Russian soldier, entered the bar opposite our hotel in the Old City where my colleagues were sitting. Words were exchanged. An altercation began.

North Korea: Kim orders mass production of new anti-aircraft weapon


North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspects the intermediate-range ballistic missile Pukguksong-2's launch test with Ri Pyong Chol (2nd L in black uniform) and Jang Chang Ha (R) in this undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) May 22, 2017. Source: Reuters/KCNA

2017-05-25T224645Z_1284157536_RC1A5AA3B630_RTRMADP_3_NORTHKOREA-MISSILES-TRIO-940x580  28th May 2017


NORTH Korean leader Kim Jong Un has supervised the test of a new anti-aircraft weapon system and ordered its mass production and deployment throughout the country, the state news agency reported on Sunday, after weeks of defiant ballistic missile tests.

The North’s KCNA news agency did not report the exact nature of the weapon or the time of the test but said it was organised by the Academy of National Defence Science, a blacklisted agency that is believed to be developing missiles and nuclear weapons.

The North has been pushing to develop a wide range of weapon systems since early last year at an unprecedented pace including a long-range missile capable of striking the mainland United States and has in recent weeks tested its intermediate-range ballistic missile, making some technical advances.


The reclusive state rejects UN and unilateral sanctions by other states against its weapons programme as an infringement of its right to self defense and says the programme is necessary to counter US aggression.

It last conducted a ballistic missile test a week ago.

The United States denies any intention to attack the North.

“Kim Jong Un … watched the test of a new type of anti-aircraft guided weapon system organized by the Academy of National Defence Science,” KCNA said on Sunday.

“This weapon system, whose operation capability has been thoroughly verified, should be mass-produced to deploy all over the country … so as to completely spoil the enemy’s wild dream to command the air, boasting of air supremacy and weapon almighty,” it said.

KCNA said Kim was accompanied by his military aides and listed the three men believed to be the top officials in the country’s rapidly accelerating missile programme.


They are Ri Pyong Chol, a former top air force general; Kim Jong Sik, a veteran rocket scientist; and Jang Chang Ha, the head of the Academy of National Defence Science, a weapons development and procurement centre.

North Korea said on Monday it had successfully tested what it called an intermediate-range ballistic missile that met all technical requirements and could now be mass-produced, although outside officials and experts questioned the extent of its progress.

On Tuesday, the head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency said that if left unchecked, North Korea is on an “inevitable” path to obtaining a nuclear-armed missile capable of striking the United States.

Appearing at a Senate hearing, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Vincent Stewart declined to offer a time estimate but Western experts believe the North still needed several years to develop such a weapon. – Reuters

Nepal: Dahal Steps Down

The Election Commission is all set to conduct the second phase of elections on June 14th as planned. Unfortunately the delayed decision of the government to create 22 additional units in the southern plains has created a problem for the commission.






by Dr. S. Chandrasekharan-

( May 28, 2017, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) Prime Minister Dahal tendered his resignation to the President on 24th May. Dahal said that he is doing it in pursuance of a commitment he made to the Nepali Congress ten months ago.

It is now for the Nepali Congress to elect a leader to oversee the second phase of local body elections and also the elections at the provincial and national levels. Most probably Sher Bahadur Deuba who had been prime minister thrice before will take over. Deuba had proved in the past to be a colourless, indecisive and inefficient chief and it is not going to be different now. Nepal is soon to be condemned to be led by another inadequate leader as Prime minister.
It is not that the Nepali Congress is devoid of able administrators. There are many among the younger lot too. But the problem is, that it has too many factions and in satisfying different factions merit is the casuality. For Deuba, the first and foremost problem will therefore be internal.
PM Dahal in his televised address to the nation said that he wanted to “break the culture of breaking political promises.” While the media has listed many of his achievements as Prime Minister, one cannot but concede that his biggest achievement was in going through the first phase of local body elections despite heavy odds. He displayed extreme patience and understanding of both the Madhesi groups and the main opposition- the arrogant UML in pushing through the elections and also set the ball rolling on the constitutional amendments.
Dahal has come a long way from his insurgency days and later in his first stint as prime minister. He made the foolish mistake of resigning from the post on the issue of sacking his then army chief.
Dahal 2.0 appears to be a different person and today stands tall over all other political leaders. I had said once before when G.P. Koirala was alive that he was only second to GP in his charisma and statesman like qualities to lead Nepal. He did not then rise above his local party politics and failed to emerge as a national leader. He has done it this time.
2n Phase of Local body elections:
The Election Commission is all set to conduct the second phase of elections on June 14th as planned. Unfortunately the delayed decision of the government to create 22 additional units in the southern plains has created a problem for the commission.
The Election Commission (EC) has so far refused to accommodate the new local units for the coming elections, chiefly for want of time. They have a genuine problem. The ballot papers and voter ID cards have already been printed. Polling personnel have already been deployed on the ground. The Commission is also yet to receive the names of the new units to be added. Maps delineating the units are also not available either.
Dahal before resigning had requested the commission to think of other options like deferring the polls by a few days. But it is not going to be easy.
Meanwhile the newly formed Madhesi alliance RJP N., is still undecided about participating in the elections. There appears to be many hardliners who still want to continue on the path of agitation. It is hoped that better sense will prevail and the Terain (Madhesi) groups decide to go for the elections no matter whether the constitutional amendments are gone through or not.
Election Results So far:
The consolidated list of winners is yet to be released. But the results announced so far indicate the following trends.
First: While both the Nepali Congress and the UML are leading almost with equal numbers, the Maoist Centre led by Dahal has come out as a distant third.
Second: The UML has gained considerably thanks to its anti Indian – ultra nationalist platform, though it did not sweep the polls as predicted by some.
Third: The combinations- the Maoist centre going with the Nepali Congress and the RPP of Kamal Thapa with the UML have not succeeded. Both the Maoist Centre and the RPP fared poorly.
Fourth: The new found hill/plains combination of Dr. Bhattarai and Upendra Yadav did not also succeed well at the polls. One good result has been that the political clout and the influence of the Madhesi leader Upendra Yadav is diminishing. It is good for Nepali politics.
Finally, what is significant is that Nepal is getting ready to be a truly federal democratic republic.

South Africa: Jacob Zuma 'plans second home in Dubai'


AFP--President Zuma is reported to be considering a relocation to Dubai as pressure mounts at home--
The president has been criticised for what are alleged to be his close ties to the influential Gupta business family
The skyline of Dubai is pictured from the Burj Khalifa (16 May 2017)Protesters hold signs criticising President Zuma's links to the Gupta family and to Russia in Port Elizabeth, South Africa (04 April 2017)
Jacob ZumaProtesters in Pretoria (file photo)
President Jacob Zuma is coming under increasing pressure to step down--South Africa has seen numerous protests to demand Mr Zuma's resignation
BBC
28 May 2017
South Africa's embattled president Jacob Zuma has been planning to set up home in Dubai, according to emails published in South African media.
The reports suggest deepening ties between President Zuma and the controversial Gupta business family.
But the president's spokesman has dismissed them as an utter fabrication.
Pressure on Mr Zuma has been mounting in recent months because of corruption scandals, cabinet sackings and his handling of the economy.
Senior members of Mr Zuma's governing ANC tabled a motion of no confidence against him on Sunday at a closed-door meeting of the party's National Executive Committee.
But the chairman of the meeting blocked the move because it was not on the official agenda, state-owned broadcaster SABC said.
It is the second time in six months that party rebels have mounted such a challenge and they are thought likely to try again.

Under pressure

The BBC's Karen Allen in Johannesburg says the ANC now looks like it's in permanent fire fighting mode
Emails between President Zuma's son Duduzane and figures from a company owned by the controversial Gupta family - who reportedly wield considerable influence over Mr Zuma - include a letter to the Abu Dabi royal family, our correspondent says.
"I am happy to inform you that my family has decided to make the UAE a second home," the president is quoted as saying. "It will be a great honour for me and my family to gain your patronage during our proposed residency in the UAE."
This opens up questions as to whether this is part of an exit strategy, with Mr Zuma's party appearing to be turning against him, our correspondent adds.
Meanwhile Zuma loyalists will continue their efforts to block any no confidence motion on technical grounds.
A motion submitted by opposition parties is being pushed through parliament and is now being examined by the constitutional court.
The president's successor is expected to be selected at a major conference of the ANC's top brass in December.
Until then the party looks set to limp from crisis to crisis, our correspondent says.
Mr Zuma's allies say he will remain in office until his term ends in 2019, but evidence of his unpopularity seems to be growing. He was forced to abandon a May Day rally this year after he was booed by workers demanding his resignation.
His ex-wife Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma and Deputy President Cyril Rampahosa are vying to succeed him.

How Alcoholics Anonymous Psychologically Abuses the Marginalized

In some ways, AA helped me. But as an afrolatin trans woman, it also hurt me.
By harMONEY samiruhh -May 27, 2017

Home“My name is Princess and I’m an alcoholic!”
“Hi, Princess!”

This ritualistic greeting used to be welcome. Now, it’s little more than a reminder of the worlds I became imprisoned in — the dual worlds of addiction and recovery.

When I joined Alcoholics Anonymous and its spin-off, Narcotics Anonymous, I was seeking escape from my dependence on opiates and alcohol. Three and a half years later, I am free of heroin and alcohol in part because of the 12-step program, and I continue to apply some of its principles to my life.

But the program’s ideology was in many ways irrelevant to me. The literature of AA and NA preaches a heteronormative approach to sexuality — unavoidable, perhaps, as both programs were founded by heterosexual men at a time when queer people were repressed. Politically, the adherents of the programs, and the text themselves, also promote an anti-liberation, “bootstraps” approach that I’ve never been comfortable with.

But the bigger issue is that, as an afrolatin trans woman, I often found the 80-plus-year-old program and its strict adherents to be psychologically abusive.

I was first introduced to AA when I was at a mental hospital that included programs for drug-addicted people. I didn’t check myself in for addiction specifically, but because I had heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of abuse in my system, I was funneled there. Though I technically could’ve said no to attending an AA meeting, doing so could’ve led to me being labeled uncooperative, which in turn could’ve ensured a longer stay.

At the first AA meeting I attended at the hospital, I was pulled aside by one of the speakers, who told me I should get off my hormones and pray for God to “remove my problem.” It was clear he wasn’t talking about my drinking or my using, but my gender “problem.”

And so it was that my rocky relationship with 12-step programs began. I enjoyed, and would still enjoy, the AA and NA meetings I felt comfortable attending. But as I was typically the only trans person in the room — and in some cases, one of the only people of color — I also often experienced harassment and humiliation.

Members at subsequent meetings told me to pray my gender dysphoria away, or declared that the dysphoria remaining was a sign that I failed to move through the steps thoroughly. Complicating this was the fact that that my drug abuse did start off as a way to cope with gender dysphoria (and my being trans in a Latinx household) — but because of the judgemental environment, I never felt comfortable expressing that.

Other times, members would attempt to use meetings as their conversion therapy camp. In one instance, a group of religious men gave me their phone numbers because they felt that I needed men to set me on a religious path and make me masculine again. They seemed to believe that trans women who used and abused drugs and alcohol became trans as a “symptom” of addiction or alcoholism.

Other times, I faced sexual harassment or physical intimidation (usually if I rejected advances). One incident resulted in me having to change my phone number because I was getting threats and insults daily for refusing a man.

Misgendering was also startlingly common at meetings. Sometimes, members would be handed a list of other members to call if they feared a relapse; these were supposed to be gender segregated, with men given lists of other men, and women of other women. Once, a man tried to fight me for putting my name and number on a woman addict’s phone number list. Another time, I was given a list of phone numbers entirely composed of men.

It’s not hard to discern why AA and NA meetings often felt so hostile to someone like me. Membership surveys report that 62% of AA members are male, and 89% are white. NA membership, meanwhile, is 59% male and 74% white. Like many such organizations, there is virtually no accounting for trans or gender nonbinary members. Because both organizations have roots in religious principles — the ultimate goal of sobriety is a “spiritual awakening,” and seven of the 12 steps refer either to a deity or religious practices — they also perpetuate conservative beliefs, and often attract conservative Christians as adherents.

There are also underlying issues with the 12-step ideology itself, with fundamental program principles effectively encouraging abuse against the marginalized.

Gaslighting, the psychological abuse tactic of twisting information about something in order to make someone doubt or take guilt upon themselves, is touted as part — an important part — of AA and NA.
From the book Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, the founder of AA writes, “It is a spiritual axiom that every time we are disturbed, no matter what the cause, there is something wrong with us.” He goes on to say that if someone else hurts us, we’re still in the wrong. The book Alcoholics Anonymous, meanwhile, includes such passages as, “Sometimes they hurt us, seemingly without provocation, but we invariably find that at some time in the past we have made decisions based on self which later placed us in a position to be hurt” and “Putting out of our minds the wrongs others had done, we resolutely looked for our own mistakes.”

Sometimes, this line of thinking manifested as members subtly challenging my “victimhood,” a painful charge that was not only debilitating — I couldn’t respond without “proving” the taunt — but loaded. The subtext was clear: If you don’t get over your oppression, you’ll drink and die. Other times, cishet white men essentially demanded that I take responsibility for being sexually harassed, publicly humiliated, and physically intimidated — not only in my life outside the program, but during the meetings themselves. If I suffered, I was told, it had to be my fault.

The idea of fear, too, was exploited in dangerous ways. As the AA book puts it, “Fear is an evil, corroding thread; the fabric of our lives is shot through with it.” It is fear, we are told, which can kill alcoholics. Anything that might be fear, or anything that one can reduce to being fear, is interpreted as a sign that we’re still in the same place we were in when we were drinking.

But while combatting fear in some ways make sense, this becomes problematic when applied to the marginalized. The fear I expressed wasn’t unreasonable; it was rooted in a necessary sense of self-preservation.

Trans women of color face excessive levels of violence, violence that has unfortunately touched all the places I call home. When I refused to go to meetings in areas that I know are notorious for queer bashing or racist harassment — or to meetings at night because of street harassment, or to those near ones where I had been mistreated — I did so to ensure I didn’t face violence or even death. But because of the ideology and literature of AA and NA, these decisions were interpreted as me not committing to my recovery, as one member once explicitly accused me of.

I am grateful that I was able to get help from AA and NA, and I do intend to live my life according to the 12 steps to the best of my ability without the meetings. But considering the harm caused by the organizations, I can also say confidently that walking away was the best decision I could’ve made.
Considering that transgender people are at a high risk for substance abuse, and often need the kind of support that AA and NA can provide, my experience should cause alarm.

That said, there are other options for feminists, queer people, and others who share my feelings and who need to recover from alcoholism or drug addiction. My advice? Seek out community. Seek out alternative methods of recovery. There are many available to us: SMART RecoveryWomen for SobrietyLifeRing Secular SobrietyModeration Management, the Sinclair Method, and drug replacement therapies are all viable options. Hell, seek someone like me out, someone who lives by the 12 steps but doesn’t attend AA.
Most importantly, know this: You don’t have to expose yourself to abuse to recover.