Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Ashu Marasinghe, Upul Jayasuriya support Veli Oya jungle destruction!

Ashu Marasinghe, Upul Jayasuriya support Veli Oya jungle destruction!

May 17, 2017

MP Prof. Ashu Marasinghe and BOI chairman Upul Jayasuriya are planning to grant approval for a golf course and hotel project that will come up near Veli Oya, destroying its catchment areas, says the land and Agricultural Reform Movement. Activist of the Movement Sajeewa Chamikara says the project will also displace 3,000 farming families.

The Rs. 850 million Veli Oya irrigation project enabled the cultivation of land in both the Yala and Maha seasons. The ‘Eco Golf Resort’ is to come up in a 628 acre land in a temporalities land of Soragune Devale. It will destroy jungles at Dadayampalagama, Ranwan Guhawa in Haldummulla.
 
It is to be carried out by Alpha and Omega Developers (Pvt.) Ltd. The area, located north of Udawalawe national park, is a habitat of wild elephants.
 
The jungle land there had been fraudulently handed over to various persons by the father of S.M. Janaka Ravindra Kalupahana, Basnayake Nilame of Kuda Kataragama Devale at Soragune. It was from one such person that the investor for the project, US resident Vasu Rasiah, had obtained the land.
 
During the previous regime, Udith Lokubandara had supported the project. After the present government took office, Rasaiah tried to get minister Harim Fernando’s support for the project. Certain top officials of Haldummulla area are already supporting it.
 
The Movement says it is sad to note the support being given to the project by BOI chairman Jayasuriya. To build and run a gold course in the dry zone, large amounts of water, urea fertilizer as well as pesticide are needed as the ground will be prone to insect attacks. Also, chemicals with aluminum are needed to prevent soil erosion. Such a high level of chemical use will mean the reservoirs irrigated by Veli Oya will be contaminated. The project will not only pollute the available water, but also create an acute water shortage.
 
The Movement urges the CEA and the environment ministry to make an immediate intervention.
 
Ashika Brahmana
Charlotte Silver-17 May 2017

A private settler organization is planning “the most extensive expulsion scheme in recent years,” in the Batan al-Hawa area of Silwan in occupied East Jerusalem, the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem is warning.
The settler group, Ateret Cohanim, claims to own about an acre of land in the densely populated neighborhood near the al-Aqsa mosque.
The group has filed eviction claims against the 81 Palestinian families who live there.
B’Tselem says this concentration of evictions represents 45 percent of all Palestinians facing “dispossession on the basis of ethnicity” in East Jerusalem.

“Where will we go?”

The families are fighting the eviction claims in court, but resident Zuheir al-Rajabi tells B’Tselem that Ateret Cohanim is on a “vigorous offensive.”
Six buildings have already been taken over by the organization, emptying them of the Palestinian families who lived there. The Israeli settlers who have moved in are reinforced by private and municipal security guards, who regularly harass Palestinians, especially youngsters.
Najah al-Rajabi, 62, has lived in fear for the last 12 years, ever since settlers took over the building next to her.
“Now I’m afraid to go outside at night to pray,” she says in the video produced by B’Tselem at the top of this article.
B’Tselem has created an interactive website and a series of new videos to highlight the living conditions of Palestinians in Batan al-Hawa.
Najah’s home is tiny, with only one bedroom. She stores most of her belongings on a porch with a view of Silwan’s Kidron Valley. It also looks over her heavily guarded settler neighbors.
She is now waiting with anxiety, along with the dozens of other Palestinian families in Batan al-Hawa under threat of forced displacement, for the day she is forced to leave.
“Where will we go? They’re expelling us. It’s expulsion. Plain and simple.”

“Like we’re under house arrest”

Not all residents face their evictions with such fear. Zuheir al-Rajabi, who lives with his wife and four children in Batan al-Hawa, and serves on the neighborhood’s council, speaks with confidence that Ateret Cohanim will not succeed.


“I was born in this house. And I’ll go on living in this house. And I’ll die in this house. And I’ll leave it to my children, who will also stay in it as long as they live,” al-Rajabi tells B’Tselem in a video.
He says he possesses the records that show his family bought the house in 1966. But regardless, those who remain live in terror of the settlers and their guards.
Al-Rajabi says parents are wary to let their kids outside.
“We are forced to stay home, like we’re under house arrest,” he says.

Violence against children

On B’Tselem’s interactive website, one 10-year-old boy whose is only identified by initials recalls when he was playing marbles with his friends and 10 police officers approached them. Terrified, he hid the marbles.
“One of the officers came to see what I was hiding and shoved me in the chest. I nearly fell, but my cousin caught me,” the child recalls. “Another officer came and grabbed my leg to scare me.”
“They took my marbles with them.”
Another child, 13, tells B’Tselem that a police officer forced him and his friends to face the wall and then “kicked our legs hard until we spread them apart.”
“Then he beat us and spoke to us very rudely. He said: ‘Do you want me to fuck you?’ When I said no, he asked: ‘Have you ever been fucked?’ I said no, and he kept asking: ‘Do you want me to fuck you some other time?’ I turned around and said: ‘If you want to for yourself.’ He said: ‘I’m going to punch you now so hard it’ll flatten your face.’”

Backed by Israel

B’Tselem emphasizes that Ateret Cohanim is acting with the full backing of the Israeli-ruled Jerusalem municipality and the courts, which have consistently ruled in its favor.
The organization has been targeting Batan al-Hawa since 2001, using a variety of laws passed by Israel that give exclusive land rights to Jews.
The 81 families in Batan al-Hawa now facing eviction live on parcels of land that Israeli occupation authorities transferred to Ateret Cohanim in 2002, a move that was upheld by Israel’s courts.
In December, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution condemning as violations of international law “all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem.”
These include “construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians.”
But with Israel facing no accountability, its disregard of international law continues in Batan al-Hawa as it does across the occupied West Bank.

Republicans increasingly call for answers on Comey, Trump conversations

In controversy after controversy, congressional Republicans have defended President Trump. His disclosure of highly classified information may be too far. (Video: Jenny Starrs/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

 May 17 at 5:11 PM


Congressional Republicans are increasing pressure on the administration to produce records related to the latest string of controversies involving President Trump, amid flagging confidence in the White House and a growing sense that scandal is overtaking the presidency.

As the White House sought to contain the damage from two major scandals, leaders of two key Senate committees asked the FBI for documents related to former director James B. Comey, who was leading an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election before Trump fired him last week.

At the same time, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) broke his silence on the Comey affair to say lawmakers “need to hear from him as soon as possible.”

“I think we need to hear from him about whatever he has to say about the events of recent days, as soon as possible, before the Senate Intelligence Committee, in public,” McConnell said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal.


The comment came as the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats on the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees asked the FBI to hand over Comey’s notes about his communications with the White House and senior Justice Department officials related to the Russia investigation.

The Judiciary Committee leaders also asked the White House to provide any records of interactions between Trump officials and Comey, including audio recordings. In a nod to lawmakers’ strong desire to hear from the former director, the Intelligence Committee leaders asked him to testify in both open and closed sessions.

Meanwhile, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) has scheduled a hearing for next Wednesday on whether Trump interfered in the FBI’s investigation. Comey is invited to testify.

Chaffetz has also asked the FBI to produce records of communications between Trump and Comey.
Lawmakers’ requests came after news reports revealed Trump’s disclosure of highly classified material to Russian officials and an alleged attempt to shut down an investigation into his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein will brief the full Senate on Comey’s firing.

The collision of the two stories Tuesday night left Republicans reeling, with a senior GOP senator comparing the situation to Watergate, and Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) directing the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to immediately seek records from the FBI.

Ryan was careful to strike an evenhanded tone Wednesday, saying congressional committees would continue to conduct oversight “regardless of what party is in the White House” but seeming to dismiss some concerns that have arisen in the wake of news about a memo by Comey suggesting that Trump had pressured him to drop the Flynn investigation.

 Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.) blasted House Republicans for not taking action to investigate the Trump administration on May 17. (Reuters)

Ryan also questioned why Comey didn’t “take action” after his meeting with Trump.

“There’s clearly a lot of politics being played here,” Ryan said. “It is obvious there are some people out there who want to harm the president.”

Republicans have been more candid over the last two days in describing their concerns about Trump.

On Tuesday night, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) compared the current situation to the Watergate scandal while speaking at an International Republican Institute dinner.

“We’ve seen this movie before. I think it’s reaching the point where it’s of Watergate size and scale and a couple of other scandals that you and I have seen,” McCain told Bob Schieffer of CBS News.

“There’s a lot here that’s really scary,” Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said Wednesday morning in an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “It’s obviously inappropriate for any president to be trying to interfere with an investigation.”

Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) said he believes “changes are needed at the White House” to such a degree that he is calling for a Democrat to replace Comey as head of the FBI.

Republican leaders have so far fended off calls for a special prosecutor or independent commission to take over the Russia investigations. But signs of disagreement are increasing within the party.

Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), co-chairman of the moderate Tuesday Group, said the collective political fallout from the past week “will make it difficult” for Republicans to resist backing some sort of independent investigative body.

“We may have to move in that direction,” Dent said Wednesday at a forum moderated by Center Forward, a moderate Democratic organization.

Collins, a member of the Intelligence Committee, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) reissued calls Wednesday for the Justice Department to consider appointing a special prosecutor to probe Russia’s election interference.

And Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), one of two House Republicans to endorse an independent investigation of the Comey matter, joined Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) in saying that if the details reported this week are true, they could be grounds for impeaching Trump.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said reports about Trump pressuring Comey and sharing classified intelligence with the Russians are inaccurate. He did not directly answer whether Trump supports Comey testifying before Congress.

“The president is confident in the events that he has maintained and he wants the truth in these investigations to get to the bottom of the situation,” Spicer said in a gaggle on Air Force One. “There are two investigations going on in the House and Senate and he wants to get to the bottom of this.”

Democrats blasted House Republicans on Wednesday for doing little to probe Trump’s potential ties to Russia.

“They do as little as humanly possible just to claim that they’re doing something,” said Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee.

“Our committee should already be conducting robust and transparent investigations,” said Cummings, who joined 32 other Democrats on Tuesday night in calling for his panel to partner with the Judiciary Committee on a new probe of Trump’s White House.

“Speaker Ryan has shown he has zero — zero, zero — appetite,” the Democrat said.

Democrats’ priority is advancing a bill from Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) creating a bipartisan congressional commission to investigate Russia’s cyberintrusions, how the intelligence community handled the matter and the president’s potential involvement.

The Democrats are hoping to file a discharge petition — which requires the signatures of a majority of all House members — to compel GOP leaders to schedule a vote on the proposal. But the effort has not gathered much Republican support: as of Wednesday, The Post found only five GOP senators and 10 House Republicans open to some kind of independent investigation.

Republicans blocked another attempt to force a vote Wednesday on the House floor.

Many rank-and-file Republicans dismissed the controversies out of hand.

“It’s being made a bigger deal than what it is,” Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) said, maintaining that leaks to the media were a more serious matter.

Trump “doesn’t fit the model of a typical politician, and that’s what the real issue is here. He’s a business guy, and he wants to get things done.”

Rep. Robert B. Aderholt (R-Ala.) also was unperturbed by the latest reports. Back in Alabama, he said, there is “a lot of frustration that they’re not allowing him to do his job.”

In an interview with KIDO Talk Radio, based in Boise, Rep. Raúl R. Labrador (R-Idaho), who recently launched a bid for Idaho governor, said the Trump administration is making “many of the same mistakes” as the Obama administration.

It is unclear what Labrador believes took place during the Obama administration that is equivalent to Trump pressuring Comey or disclosing highly classified information to the Russians.

“They keep making things up, and they keep saying things that are not true,” Labrador said of the media, accusing journalists of being “complicit” with Democrats and the Russian government in trying to undermine American democracy.

“We need to be so careful about what we say about what a president does … Be very careful with what you say about the president,” he said.

Karoun Demirjian, Carol Leonnig, Ed O’Keefe, Amber Phillips, Kelsey Snell and David Weigel contributed to this report.

Report: Trump Asked Comey to Shut Down Flynn Investigation

Report: Trump Asked Comey to Shut Down Flynn Investigation

No automatic alt text available.BY ELIAS GROLL-MAY 16, 2017

President Donald Trump pushed FBI Director James Comey to halt the bureau’s investigation of the president’s disgraced national security adviser, Michael Flynn, according to a memo authored by the FBI chief and disclosed by the New York Times.

“He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go,” Trump told Comey, according to the memo, which was read to a Times reporter.

The revelation adds to a disastrous week for a Trump White House already under siege by reports that the president revealed classified information in an Oval Office meeting with top Russian officials. The conversation between Comey and Flynn represents the first evidence that Trump attempted to directly intervene in an FBI investigation targeting his aides and their possible links to Russia.

The White House denied the report. “The president has never asked Mr. Comey or anyone else to end any investigation, including any investigation involving General Flynn,” the White House said in a statement to the Times.

While the exact scope of the FBI inquiry into Flynn remains unclear, agents are likely examining conversations between the retired lieutenant general and senior Russian officials before Trump took office. Trump fired Flynn after less than a month on the job, allegedly because Flynn lied to Vice President Mike Pence about whether he discussed sanctions during conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States.

FBI agents may also be examining Flynn’s work as a lobbyist. As part of a lucrative contract with a businessman close to the Turkish government, Flynn failed to register as a foreign agent under lobbying rules. Flynn registered retroactively in March.

As part of a sprawling inquiry into Russia’s campaign to influence the outcome of the U.S. election in Trump’s favor, the FBI is investigating whether any of the president’s lieutenants conspired with the Kremlin.

Comey has long been known to document the content of conversations, and the memos described by the Times present a portrait of a president desperate to control the flow of information out of the White House and to inoculate himself from scandal. In addition to encouraging Comey to squash the Flynn investigation, Trump suggested the FBI director should imprison journalists for publishing classified information.

Despite his firing last week, Comey’s conversations with Trump do not appear to have impacted the bureau’s investigation of Russian election meddling. Last week, a Virginia grand jury issued subpoenas targeting Flynn. Last week, the FBI’s acting director, Andrew McCabe, said the bureau’s Russia investigation had not been obstructed so far.

Comey’s firing has raised questions about the continued independence of the FBI under Trump, who first claimed to have dismissed him at the recommendation of Justice Department officials. Trump later contradicted that justification in an interview with NBC. “Regardless of recommendation, I was going to fire Comey,” Trump told anchor Lester Holt. “When I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said, ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story.’”  

Photo by Andrew Harrer-Pool/Getty Images

Erdogan's bodyguards in violent clash with protesters in Washington


Two arrests made during the altercation at the Turkish ambassador’s residence in the US capital
A group of pro-Erdogan demonstrators shout slogans at a group of anti-Erdogan Kurds in Lafayette Park near the White House in Washington (Reuters)

Wednesday 17 May 2017

The city of Washington on Wednesday condemned a "brutal attack on peaceful protesters" after President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's bodyguards clashed with pro-Kurdish demonstrators.
Eleven people, including a police officer, were hurt in a brawl outside the Turkish ambassador’s residence in Washington after President Erdogan’s bodyguards attacked protesters.
Two people were arrested during the clashes on Tuesday as Erdogan held meetings in the US capital after visiting President Donald Trump. 
Witnesses said that members of Erdogan's security detail pushed past Washington police outside the ambassador's residence and attacked a group of supporters of a Kurdish group.
Video footage uploaded to social media shows a group of men in suits punching and kicking the protesters, including a prone woman, as police struggle to contain the clash. 
The clashes continued despite police attempts to restore order, with some protestors, including women, knocked to the ground before being kicked and punched.
Other videos showed bloodied protesters on the ground.

Flint Arthur, who took part in the protest, told broadcaster CNN: “We are protesting [Erdogan's] policies in Turkey, in Syria and in Iraq.”
He added the president’s bodyguards were using the “same sort of suppression of protest and free speech they engage in in Turkey”.
"Yesterday afternoon we witnessed what appeared to be a brutal attack on peaceful protesters outside the Turkish ambassador's residence," a police spokesman said.
"The actions seen outside the Turkish Embassy in Washington DC stand in contract to the First Amendment rights and principles we work tirelessly to protect every single day," a police statement said.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects the right of free expression.  
The Metropolitan Police Department said it had arrested two people for assault and identified them as US residents, 49-year-old Ayten Necmi of New York and 42-year-old Jalal Kheirabadi of Virginia.
Social media posts by the two suspects suggest that Necmi is a supporter of Erdogan who came to Washington to celebrate his visit whereas Kheirabadi is a supporter of Kurdish causes.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson ignored a question about it at a media photo opportunity. Later a spokeswoman for the State Department, said: "We are communicating our concern to the Turkish government in the strongest possible terms." 
"Violence is never an appropriate response to free speech, and we support the rights of people everywhere to free expression and peaceful protest," State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said.
Yazidi Kurd demonstrator Lucy Usoyan told broadcasterer ABC: “All of the sudden they just ran towards us, someone was beating me in the head nonstop, and I thought, ‘Okay, I’m on the ground already, what is the purpose to beat me?’”
Usoyan also said she was attacked by a pro-Erdogan supporter.
Tensions between Erdogan’s government and the Kurdish minority in the country are high.
Read more ►
The clash came after Erdogan stood side by side with Trump at the White House. The US President had promised to strengthen strained ties despite Erdogan's objections to the US arming of Kurdish fighters.
“It is absolutely unacceptable to take the YPG-PYD into consideration as partners in the region, and it’s going against a global agreement we reached,” Erdogan said, in reference to Kurdish People's’ Protection Units (YPG) operating in Syria.
He also claimed that the Kurds are using the fight against the Islamic State group as an excuse for action against Turkey. He said: “In the same way, we should never allow those groups who want to change the ethnic or religious structures in the region to use terrorism as a pretext.”

DC Police spox says they will pursue charges against Turkish men in suits who attacked protesters if possible.

The clashes are not the first incidence of Turkish political violence spilling over into Washington. In March 2016, a planned speech by Erdogan descended into violence after protesters clashed with Turkish security personnel.
At the time, a journalist was physically removed from the event site by Turkish security personnel, another kicked by a guard, and a third - a woman - thrown to the sidewalk in front of a Washington think tank where he was to speak.
The protesters outside the event, at the Brookings Institute, held a large sign reading: “Erdogan: War Criminal On The Loose,” while another used a megaphone to chant that he was a “baby-killer".

Rouhani warns Revolutionary Guards not to meddle in Iran election

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani inspects the honour guard during a welcoming ceremony upon his arrival at Vnukovo International Airport in Moscow, Russia March 27, 2017. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov/Files
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani inspects the honour guard during a welcoming ceremony upon his arrival at Vnukovo International Airport in Moscow, Russia March 27, 2017. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov/Files

By Babak Dehghanpisheh | BEIRUT-Wed May 17, 2017

President Hassan Rouhani on Wednesday urged Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guards and the Basij militia under its control not to meddle in Friday's presidential election, in a rare warning that underscored rising political tensions.

The Guards, who oversee an economic empire worth billions of dollars, are seldom criticised in public, but the pragmatist Rouhani is locked in an unexpectedly tight race against hardline cleric Ebrahim Raisi, who is believed to have their support.

"We just have one request: for the Basij and the Revolutionary Guards to stay in their own place for their own work," Rouhani said in a campaign speech in the city of Mashad, according to the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA). 

Rouhani reinforced his appeal by quoting the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic, who he said had warned the armed forces against interfering in politics.

Suspicions that the Guards and Basij falsified election results in favour of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad led to nationwide protests in 2009. Dozens of people were killed and hundreds were arrested, according to human rights groups, in the largest unrest in the history of the Islamic Republic.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the highest authority in Iran, said on Wednesday that maintaining security was a top concern for the election. He also denounced the heated rhetoric of the campaign as "unworthy", in a thinly-veiled rebuke of Rouhani, who is seeking a second four-year term.

ACCUSATIONS

Rouhani, 68, and Raisi, a 56-year-old protege of the supreme leader, have traded charges of graft and brutality on live television with an open vehemence unseen in the near-40-year history of the Islamic Republic.

Raisi has accused Rouhani of being corrupt and of mismanaging the economy. Rouhani, who wants to open up Iran to the West and ease social restrictions within the country, has responded by accusing Raisi, who served on the judiciary for several years, of human rights violations.

Both men deny the other's accusations.

Raisi developed a close relationship with senior members of the Revolutionary Guards while at the judiciary and has their backing, according to Mohsen Sazegara, a founding member of the Revolutionary Guards who is now a U.S.-based dissident.

"Raisi is the Revolutionary Guards' candidate," he said.

The Guards are looking beyond Friday's election and see Raisi as a possible candidate to be the next supreme leader, analysts say.

Although Khamenei, 77, is guarded about his political preferences, he also appears to back Raisi both as a presidential candidate and possible successor.

(Reporting By Babak Dehghanpisheh; Editing by Gareth Jones)

Has the taxpayer really made a profit from selling Lloyds?



The government sold its remaining shares in Lloyds today, with the bank declaring that the sale returned “more than £21.2 billion to the British taxpayer, repaying £894 million more than the original investment”.

You’d be forgiven for thinking that this means we’ve profited to the tune of nearly £900 million. A win for the UK taxpayer, surely? And at a time when any additional cash into the public coffers is extremely welcome.

But on closer inspection, things are not quite so simple.

The bank, which was bailed out eight years ago by Gordon Brown’s government, received £20.5bn of public money during the financial crisis in return for a 43.4% share in the group.
Today’s sale marks the end of a messy breakup.

Philip Hammond was forced to push back plans to sell the government’s stake in Lloyds last autumn, citing “ongoing market volatility” and the need to “secure value for money for the taxpayer” as reasons for the delay.

Back in 2013, George Osborne made the first sale of government shares in the bank, which he claimed yielded a “profit for taxpayers” in the region of £450 million.

FactCheck called him out on this at the time, noting that the headline “profit” figure didn’t take account of the cost to government of borrowing the money to bail out the banks in the first place. The National Audit Office backed us up, later concluding that “there was a shortfall for the taxpayer of at least £230m” after the 2013 sale.

So naturally, our ears pricked up this morning when Lloyds declared that today’s conscious uncoupling has recouped nearly £900 million of public money. Surely this time, they’ll have got it right, and their calculations will take full account of the costs to government?
Well, almost.

We contacted Lloyds to ask them to show their working. They said that the £900 million figure came from comparing the “absolute figure (£20.3bn) originally injected into the Group and (£21.2bn) that has been generated through the selldown and returned to the taxpayer, including dividends”. They pointed out that their press release does not talk about profit. And they’re right.

But we didn’t get any detail from them on whether the cost of government borrowing was part of their calculations. And the very fact that they avoided using the word “profit” suggests that it might not have been.

So in the absence of any further detail from them, we’ve done our best to fill in the blanks.

The government bought its stake in Lloyds in several transactions through 2009 at a gross cost of £20.3 billion.

But that wasn’t cash that the government just had sloshing around – they had to borrow £3.2 billion over four years and a half years to finance the purchase.

At the time, the government had to pay 3 per cent interest a year on its borrowing, which means it cost them £96 million for every year of the loan. By our estimates, that puts total interest repayments at over £400 million, and that’s not even adjusted for inflation. Add to that the £2.5 billion fee that Lloyds paid when it left the Treasury’s asset protection scheme, and today’s £900 million “return” looks rather less impressive.

So have Lloyds learned their lesson? Yes and no. They’ve not actually used the word “profit”, and they’re not making any explicit claims about the taxpayer benefiting from the bailout. But if someone issues a press release saying they’ve given you more money than you gave them, you’d be within your rights to think you were up on the deal. And as we’ve shown (twice) that’s not the case.

What does the Treasury say?

The Treasury have been quiet on this, in contrast to their triumphant tone back in 2013. They have issued a purely factual statement confirming the sale on their website.

We’d like to think it’s the threat of the FactCheck treatment keeping them honest, but so-called purdah rules prevent government departments from major policy or political announcements this close to an election.

Perhaps that strict requirement to stick only to the facts explains why the Treasury hasn’t – or can’t – use the word “profit”.

But before the purdah period began, Chancellor Philip Hammond gave a speech in the margins of the IMF conference last month, saying that the government had “recovered every penny of its investment in Lloyds” and it “marks a significant milestone” for the economy.

A milestone, certainly. A victory, not so much.

'Why must I live in fear?' Mexico shaken after yet another journalist murdered

On Monday in Sinaloa, Javier Valdez was gunned down in broad daylight – the latest reporter to be caught up in Mexico’s wave of drug-related violence

Sinaloa said farewell to Javier Valdez, 50, on Tuesday, with hundreds of mourners spilling out the back door of the chapel in a Culiacán funeral home. Photograph: Hector Parra/AFP/Getty Images
 
Javier Valdez was shot 12 times in what colleagues said was a targeted attack. Photograph: Uncredited/AP

 in Culiacán-Wednesday 17 May 2017

Javier Valdez wrote his own epitaph. After the 23 March murder of Miroslava Breach, a reporter in the northern Mexican city of Chihuahua, Valdez tweeted: “Let them kill us all, if that is the death sentence for reporting this hell. No to silence.”

Valdez never stayed silent, reporting fearlessly on dynastic rivalries within the Sinaloa cartel – as well as the often forgotten victims of mafia violence.

He was killed on Monday at midday, barely a block from the office of Ríodoce (Twelfth River), the newspaper he co-founded in 2003. He was shot 12 times – perhaps symbolically – in what colleagues say was a targeted attack.

“We always knew this could occur. We were conscious of it, and never denied that we were scared,” said Ismael Bohórquez, director of Ríodoce.

Unlike many newspapers in Mexico – which have simply given up attempting to explain the drug-fueled violence that has claimed 200,000 lives in the past decade – neither Valdez nor Ríodoce had shied away from covering topics like crime and corruption. His sources were solid, and he may have calculated that living in a region dominated by one all-powerful cartel would protect him from getting caught in the crossfire.

But such certainties have disappeared amid a succession crisis in the Sinaloa cartel after the arrest and extradition of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

“We crossed a line. I don’t know what happened,” said Bojórquez in an interview at the modest Ríodoce offices in Culiacán. “These aren’t lines in the street; you don’t know when you’ve crossed them.”

Sinaloa said farewell to Valdez, 50, on Tuesday, with hundreds of mourners spilling out the back door of the chapel in a Culiacán funeral home already overflowing with floral bouquets. Colleagues remembered him as a cheerful figure, never seen without the Panama hat that was laid on the dark wood of his coffin.
“Javier was easygoing, someone you liked a lot, very empathetic … and someone that tried to find a little hope in everything,” said Andrés Villarreal, an investigative reporter at Ríodoce, who fought back tears as he spoke.

The murder sparked outrage in Mexico, where six reporters have been murdered so far this year, reinforcing the country’s reputation as the most dangerous place to practice journalism in the region.
Some independent outlets stopped publishing as part of a protest dubbed “a day without journalism”. 

The press freedom advocacy organization Article 19 counts 104 journalist murders in Mexico since 2000. Reporters Without Borders ranks Mexico No 147 on its annual press freedom rankings, one spot ahead of Russia.

“Never have we seen those in the industry so outraged and united,” tweeted Daniel Moreno Chávez, director of the news outlet Animal Politico.

This year’s spate of killings have horrified the country. Breach was gunned down as she drove her son to school in the northern city of Chihuahua. The newspaper publishing her work, Norte, subsequently closed, saying it couldn’t keep its journalists safe.

Cecilio Pineda, founder of a news site in the rugged Tierra Caliente region of the poppy-producing Guerrero state, was shot 10 times while lying in a hammock.

Last weekend, seven reporters travelling through Guerrero to investigate a confrontation between rival gangs were swarmed by 100 gunmen, beaten and robbed of their belongings.

But as is common in Mexico, the attacks have all languished in impunity. A special prosecutor’s office was established in 2006 to take over cases of crimes committed against journalists from potentially corrupt or inept investigators; it has resulted in just three convictions.

“It’s useless,” said Javier Garza Ramos, the former editor of the newspaper El Siglo de Torreón, whose building was shot at five times between 2009 and 2013; four employees have been kidnapped. “The [federal] and state attorneys general don’t investigate, much less punish.”

President Enrique Peña Nieto has expressed regret over Valdez’s murder, and on Wednesday he announced new protection measures for the media. However the president was widely criticised for failing to include any journalists in the plan’s preparation or launch.

The country’s interior minister, Miguel Ángel Osorio Chong, also promised to act and raise it with Mexico’s 31 state governors.

But freedom of speech advocates said the plan was too little, too late, especially as some of those same governors have become notorious for failing to prevent attacks on the the media – and even paying or pressuring local reporters to provide positive coverage.

In Culiacán, the capital of Sinaloa, local journalists marched into state government offices on Tuesday and refused to leave without speaking to the governor, Quirino Ordaz Coppel.

“Impunity is what killed Javier – and it’s what will kill all of us,” thundered one reporter in a series of testy exchanges.

“Why can’t I go home in peace? Why do I have to live in fear?” sobbed another.

Ordaz, who at times seemed on the verge of losing his temper, promised a special prosecutor to investigate. “Javier was a friend. I have the same outrage as you.”

Valdez chronicled crime and its consequences in Sinaloa, writing three books and penning a weekly column in Ríodoce called Weeds. His work showed a rare empathy, especially for victims of violence, in a state where the illegal drugs business has sunk deep roots and the government is often seen by local people as little more than another faction in the crime war.

“When news would break, we would trade tips on what happened, but he would go look for the victims,” said Ismael Medina, a Culiacán reporter who knew Valdez at university. “He would go talk to them and even help them.”

Colleagues said that Valdez knew the value of discretion, but refused to pull his punches when reporting on the cartels, even when the country’s drug wars heated up in the mid-2000s.

In an interview last year with Rompeviento TV, Valdez said: “You have to assume the task that falls to you as a journalist. Either that, or you play dumb.

“I don’t want to be asked: ‘What were you doing in the face of so much death ... why didn’t you say what was going on?’”

Conditions started to change after Guzmán’s third arrest last year – a move which left the Sinaloa cartel splintered between factions loyal to El Chapo’s sons and those loyal to his former right-hand man, Dámaso López.

When Ríodoce ran a recent cover story on López, the magazine’s delivery trucks were followed by gangs of men who bought up every copy – a tactic often used by criminals or politicians who want to suppress a story. López was arrested earlier this month,

“The new generation is much more violent. They don’t think,” said one Ríodoce staffer. “That they would attack a newspaper like this tells us a lot. And changes a lot of our ways doing things.”

Valdez’s colleagues presume that his death was related to the internecine war with the Sinaloa cartel, but nobody at the magazine could say who might have been responsible. “We don’t know which side it was,” Bohórquez said.

What they were determined to make clear, however, was that they would continue publishing and covering organized crime, even after losing their best-known reporter.

“You can’t do journalism in Sinaloa without covering the topic of drug trafficking,” Bohórquez said. “We knew it was important to publicly expose it – and we will continue do that, because that is our commitment to the people here.”