Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Teenage Sexuality And The Age Of Marriage: A National Issue.​​​



strong>by Mass L.-
( May 17,2017,London, Sri Lanka Guardian) Child marriage is defined as a formal marriage or informal union before age 18. The following statistics from the World Health Organization indicates that this is a global problem, “about 16 million girls between the ages of 15 to 19 and, two million girls under the age of 15 give birth every year”.
In Sri Lanka, the incidence of child marriage is lesser in the city/urban environment and more conspicuous in the rural areas. FOKUS WOMEN observes that, “under age marriage of girls is reported to have increased in Sri Lanka particularly in the North, East and among the rural communities” (April 2016).
Two exceptional events may have contributed to the increase in child marriages. Firstly, the LTTE exempting those who were married from being enlisted. Secondly, marriages between the IDP/refugees mainly among Muslims/Tamils. These marriages were obviously for security reasons. This data should not be generalised.
Another interesting finding is regarding, “Girls below eighteen entering into de facto marriages in the rural communities for several reasons”. One of which is “romantic relationships resulting in elopement”. (FOKUS WOMEN.)
The foregoing clearly substantiates that the Age of Marriage, which is eighteen, as laid down in the General Marriage Registration Ordinance (GMRO) is not being followed strictly.
Kotahalu Mangallaya
See the beauty of our Sinhala culture. With the onset of menarche (signifying Puberty) the traditional ‘Kotahalu Magul’ takes place. “She is kept indoors and isolated from outsiders and even the males of her own family” writes Dr. Y.D. Jayatilleke, Sociology and Anthropology Department, University of Jayawardenapura. “This custom is followed to make the physically matured girl to become mentally matured”. The main objective is to instil discipline and restraint. The girl goes through various exercises preparing her “to play her future role as a woman, wife and mother”. Even though she may be under 18 years of age.
With modernity and advancement, the cultural value of discipline and restraint has been transformed. Teenage innocence is waning The drift towards increased teenage sexuality arising from the free intermingling of sexes is a factor for this change.
Teenage Sexuality
A UNICEF study (2013), reveals that child marriages were most often a product of teenage sexuality, and do not appear to be linked to customary or forced marriages etc. (See : Emerging concerns and case studies on child marriage in Sri Lanka).
The case of Marmba Liyanage Rohana alias Loku (S.C. Appeal No. 89 A /2009) provides a good illustration.
The accused was indicted for committing rape on fifteen year old Anusha Priyadarshani, a Grade 11 student. Anusha had a love affair with the accused. Her mother became hostile. Life at home became intolerable. One day she met her boyfriend and asked him to take her away from home or she will commit suicide. He took her to his uncle’s house. During that period they had sexual intimacy as willing partners. Anusha said to Judicial Medical Officer, “I went with him on my own free will and lived together with him.”
School of Legal Realism
The accused (boyfriend) was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. The sentence was appealed and a suspended sentence given. The Supreme Court observed : “There is no doubt whatsoever that the accused is technically guilty of the offence…… However, after considering the facts of the case and the submissions of the counsel, I hold that this is not a case where the accused has to suffer a custodial sentence.”
Hypothetically, say, Kumari a girl below 16 had been impregnated by her boyfriend. The law will indict him for statutory rape. Why? Because the laws says that a girl below 16 cannot consent. This is unreal, arbitrary and contrary to medical opinion. Underestimating the capacity of a 16-year-old girl is gender discrimination.
He will be sentenced to jail. Their child will grow up seeing the father behind bars. The child deprived of the warmth, love and affection of the father (minimum sentence, ten years). Very depressingly, even the two innocent lovers cannot marry until the jail term is completed. Kumari who is 16 will have to wait till she is 26 to marry (and the father can have his ten year old as his best man!). Practically, does this make sense?
From this emerges other conflicts of interest. Child marriage; Deprivation of the fundamental right to marry; Gender discrimination and the welfare of the new born child. The unrealistic law which prohibits marriage because she is below 18, has created problems further burdening society.
Repeatedly Raped
If the parents disown Kumari who will care for the new born and this unmarried teenage girl? Living with no security and protection exposes women to predators like child traffickers, pimps, drug pushers and other criminals. Will not she be vulnerable for sexual abuse by our holier-than-thou social structure? Remember the repeated rape of a 12 year old child by several men. Seeking refuge, she had then gone to a temple which her mother visits regularly. In the very place of supposed refuge she was raped by the monk in the temple. (CT. July 30, 2016).
In the year 2016, 347 children had been raped, 713 had been sexual harassed and 196 children have been subjected to grave sexual abuse as per the National Child Protection Authority.
Absorbing certain realities devoid of emotional or other prejudices is fundamental to understanding teenage sexuality. This issue has to be looked into objectively, holistically and independently.
National Issue
No parent, as a rule, would give the daughter in marriage when she is not fully ready. To dramatize by questioning (as often heard), “would you give your young daughter in marriage”, in my view is egotistic, argumentative and borders on stupidity. Instead, ask the question, “Would you allow your teenager to indulge in adventurous sex?” In Sri Lanka, the parents know when to find a suitable partner. See the advertisements in the Dailies reading: “Govigama Parents seeking…..”, “Muslim Parents….” and so on.
To ride the wave of servile complaisance and be blinded by impermanent man made principles is not wise. We must adapt to social reality and seriously address this as a National issue impacting on the behaviour of our youth – Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim etc. The situation today is that, “Adolescent sexuality and teenage pregnancy is a reality in Sri Lanka…..” (Savithri Goonasekera). Further, in the UNICEF study above, it is noted that of the 71 girls interviewed, 21 girls (30%) were pregnant before they turned 18.
‘18’, Is Not A Solution
The huge brouhaha over child marriage as if some alien from another planet has invaded the earth is hyperactivity. Child marriages have been there for centuries. Not all child marriages have necessarily resulted in the evils vociferously being marketed. Thousands have lived honourably and these great ancestors of ours have blessed this country with invaluable progeny. The respected Professor Savithri Goonesekera herself admits that her paternal grandmother was married at 13 years (UNICEF, 2013). This is the truth whether it is a Sinhalese, Tamil or Muslim family.
The emerging trend must be reviewed without upsetting the established equilibria of the different socio-economic and religio-cultural circumstances. Evolution challenges us to adapt to changing conditions. Embracing pragmatism in place of dogmatism should be preferred. Measures may be taken to regulate this phenomenon with wisdom, positivity and in the greater National interest.
Law for the sake of law is self-defeating. In India, despite the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, child marriages continued unabated. The government then passed The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 replacing the earlier legislation. In spite of stricter laws in India, 15% of those below 15 years of age get married and 47% of those under 18 are married according to UNICEF records.
It is also misleading to cite intergenerational poverty, violence and abandonment as unique to child marriages. These occur in marriages between older adults too and the number of incidents may be much greater.
Lower The Age Of Marriage
I am not advocating child marriage. However, to continue having the age of marriage as 18 has neither been beneficial to society nor a solution to teenage sexuality. We must find a solution to monitor and regulate. For example, attempts to reduce the incidence of sexual violence and underage sex in Sri Lanka by increasing the age for consensual sex to 16, has been a failure as per research.
Sociologically, adolescence is the period of transition between the dependency of childhood and the autonomy of adulthood. This means that there is no universally agreed upon definition for the ages at which adolescence begins and ends. For example, in the Mayan community in Guatemala, adolescence begins at age 10.
The Quran does not specify an age but refers to (1) puberty and (2) judicious maturity as eligibilities to marry. Contextually, there is no need to keep changing the age, as these two requirements provide an effective benchmark to assess eligibility. After all, maturity is subjective. Thus, a person past 18 years may not be able to marry if he/she is an idiot, legally. On the contrary, a girl who has attained puberty and is sixteen cannot marry if she does not possess judicious maturity. It will be incorrect to assume that all who are 18 are matured.
There was some discussion on lowering of the age of consensual sex below 16. Even so, willing partners cannot marry until they are 18 (vide. Section 15 of GMRO and Gunaratnam v. Registrar-General (2002) 2 SLR). The society is paving the way for the woman to be exploited and dumped any time. The women have to protected.
“Premarital sex with teenage girls resulting in teenage pregnancy has also resulted in some women’s groups advocating for lowering the age of marriage.” (Goonesekere, 2004 ii).
The review of age of marriage as a public policy demands a proper understanding of teenage sexual behaviour. Amendment to the GMRO is a crying need of our times. The society has a duty to save our teenagers from unlawful sex and, save the new-born from being stigmatised as an illegitimate child.
The End.
Vietnam: Environmentalists targeted by manhunt for ‘abusing democratic freedoms’


The Vietnamese national flag flies on a diplomatic car outside the Great Hall of the People before talks between Vietnam's President Tran Dai Quang and Chinese leaders in Beijing, China, May 12, 2017. Source: Reuters/Thomas Peter
2017-05-12T094718Z_998182953_RC1B6869AE00_RTRMADP_3_CHINA-SILKROAD-940x580  hoang_duc_binh  hoang_duc_binh  2017-05-12T094718Z_998182953_RC1B6869AE00_RTRMADP_3_CHINA-SILKROAD-940x580
Vietnamese human rights defender Hoang Duc Binh. Source: Frontline Defender


17th May 2017

ENVIRONMENTAL rights defender Hoang Duc Binh has been arrested by the Vietnamese government for supposedly “abusing democratic freedoms” after he organised a protest to mark a year since Taiwanese steel giant Formosa caused a major environmental disaster.

According to human rights NGO Frontline Defenders, Hoang Duc Binh was violently dragged from his car and arrested on Monday by Vietnamese authorities in the northern province of Nghe An, over the protest march held early April, on the anniversary of a toxic waste spill from the Formosa plant.

The government is charging him with “resisting persons in the performance of their duties” and “abusing democratic freedoms.”


Hoang Duc Binh will reportedly be held for 90 days while he is being investigated, spurring fears of ill treatment whilst in custody.

He is a member of Viet Labour, an organisation of labour groups within and outside of Vietnam that fight for workers’ rights, as well as the environmentalist Vietnam Path Movement.

Another activist Bach Hong Quyen is still being hunted by authorities, facing charges of “causing public disorder” for his role in the demonstration. Both are active bloggers.

Human Rights Watch says “activists and dissident bloggers face constant harassment and intimidation, including physical assault and imprisonment” in Vietnam’s communist regime which “allows no challenge to its leadership.”

In 2015, at least 40 bloggers and rights activists were beaten by plainclothes agents.

A number human rights defenders have been “harassed” by Vietnamese authorities for covering the 2016 toxic waste spill, which left fishermen out of a job in four provinces by killing huge numbers of fish to die, says Frontline Defenders.

In October last year, another activist was arrested for possessing “anti-government material” linked to the Formosa spill.

Frontline Defenders called on Vietnam to, “Cease targeting all human rights defenders in Vietnam and guarantee in all circumstances that they are able to carry out their legitimate human rights activities without fear of reprisals and … judicial harassment.”

US teen died after drinking caffeine too quickly, coroner says

Image copyrightREUTERS
coffee
Davis CripeEnergy drinks on sale in California
Davis Cripe drank three caffeinated drinks in just under two hours--Image captionThe American Academy of Paediatrics warns against young people drinking energy drinks

BBC16 May 2017

A healthy teenager in the US state of South Carolina died from drinking several highly-caffeinated drinks too quickly, a coroner has ruled.

Davis Allen Cripe collapsed at a high school in April after drinking a McDonald's latte, a large Mountain Dew soft drink and an energy drink in just under two hours, Gary Watts said.

The 16-year-old died from a "caffeine-induced cardiac event causing a probable arrhythmia".
He had no pre-existing heart condition.

The teenager weighed 90kg (200 lbs) but would not have been considered morbidly obese, Mr Watts said.
"This is not a caffeine overdose," Mr Watts told Reuters news agency.

"We're not saying that it was the total amount of caffeine in the system, it was just the way that it was ingested over that short period of time, and the chugging of the energy drink at the end was what the issue was with the cardiac arrhythmia."
Caffeine would probably not have been seen as a factor in the teenager's death if witnesses had not been able to tell officials what he had been drinking before his death, the Richland County coroner said.
The main witness could not say which brand of energy drink Davis drank but said it was from a container the size of a large soft drink.


"We're not trying to speak out totally against caffeine," Mr Watts said. "We believe people need to pay attention to their caffeine intake and how they do it, just as they do with alcohol or cigarettes."

The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) has warned against children and teenagers consuming energy drinks, saying their ingredients have not been tested on children and "no-one can ensure they are safe".

It says they have side-effects including irregular heartbeats and blood pressure changes.
Most energy drinks contain a caffeine equivalent of three cups of coffee and as much as 14 teaspoons of sugar, the AAP says.

Davis may have consumed about 470mg of caffeine in just under two hours, based on statistics from the website caffeineinformer.com.

It says a McDonald's latte has 142mg of caffeine, a 570ml (20oz) Mountain Dew has 90mg, and a 450ml (16oz) energy drink can have as much as 240mg.

In 2015, the European Food Safety Authority said drinking more than 400mg could lead to increased heart rate, higher blood pressure, irregular heartbeat, tremors, nervousness, insomnia and panic attacks.

How can caffeine kill? Michelle Roberts, BBC News Online Health Editor


Caffeine is a stimulant. It acts on the body's central nervous system within minutes, increasing alertness and reducing sleepiness.

But it has other effects too. It can raise your heart rate and make you feel jittery or anxious.
And once you've drunk it, it will take hours to clear it from your system.

Having a few cups of coffee or other caffeinated drinks a day is considered perfectly safe. But drinking too much or lots in a short space of time is risky.

You can overdose on caffeine and it is possible to die if you ingest too much.

Up to 400mg of caffeine a day appears to be safe for most healthy adults. That's roughly the amount of caffeine in four cups of brewed coffee, 10 cans of Coca-Cola or two "energy shot" drinks (although check the caffeine content of the beverage as it can vary).

Adolescents and pregnant women are advised to have less than this, though. Caffeinated drinks are unsuitable for toddlers and young children.

Caffeine warning signs

You may want to cut back on caffeine if you experience side effects such as:
  • Headache
  • Insomnia
  • Nervousness
  • Irritability
  • Restlessness
  • Stomach upset
  • Fast heartbeat
  • Muscle tremors

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Sri Lanka’s Transition to Nowhere

Fragile hopes for lasting peace and cooperation across party and ethnic lines are imperilled. To avoid leaders of the corrupt and violent former regime taking back control of the country, President Sirisena’s two-year-old “unity government” should put aside short-term calculations and return to reform.

Executive Summary

No automatic alt text available.16 MAY 2017

Two years into President Maithripala Sirisena’s term, Sri Lanka’s fragile hopes for lasting peace and cooperation across party and ethnic lines are imperilled. Despite significant achievements in the coalition government’s first nine months, progress on most of its reform agenda has slowed to a crawl or been reversed. As social tensions rise and the coalition slowly fractures, it is unclear whether it can push its signature new constitution through parliament and to a national referendum. Neither the president nor prime minister has made a serious attempt to win support for a more inclusive polity or to reform the national security state to tackle the institutionalised impunity that has fed ethnic unrest and harmed all communities. To protect democratic gains, enable lasting reforms and reduce risks of social and political conflict, the “unity government” should put aside short-term party and individual political calculations and return to a politics of reform and openness.

Sorting Bad Apples: Is Lustration the Answer to Sri Lanka’s Military Impunity?




Featured image courtesy Ishara S Kodikara/AFP

SHAMARA WETTIMUNY on 05/16/2017

Suspects with military links feature in a number of ongoing investigations into crimes and human rights violations committed in Sri Lanka’s post-war period. The Criminal Investigation Department’s report in Lasantha Wickramatunga’s murder investigation detailing military-run ‘death squads’, and the alleged involvement of military intelligence in the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda are examples of this tendency. Meanwhile, recent allegations that 134 Sri Lankan peacekeepers sexually abused children in Haiti exemplify the problem of military indiscipline in the country.

In this context, there is a need for a process to distinguish between perpetrators of crimes, and those within the military who conducted themselves lawfully and professionally during the war and its aftermath. This process is crucial for post-war peace, as the failure to separate criminals from those who abide by the law fosters a culture of impunity, and brings the entire military apparatus to disrepute in the eyes of victims. Prosecution of perpetrators is the most obvious and straightforward means of ensuring accountability. As Sri Lanka grapples with questions of accountability, the viability of lustration will no doubt be considered.

This article discusses the viability of lustration as a means of advancing accountability in post-war Sri Lanka. It examines this question through a historical lens, based on the experience in Europe. This article does not seek to promote or refute the suitability of lustration; it instead invites policymakers and human rights practitioners in Sri Lanka to reflect on the historical lessons that can be learnt from lustration policies adopted elsewhere.

What is lustration?

The term ‘lustration’ is usually associated with policies adopted by newly independent states across Eastern Europe in the 1990s following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The term ‘lustration’ comes from the Latin word lustratio, which means ‘purification by sacrifice’. Thus it was viewed as a cleansing process for former Soviet states to remodel their societies on the basis of liberal democratic principles such free speech, accountability, and the rule of law.

The term lustration has no strict definition. Susanne Karstedt defines lustration as involving criminal proceedings against elites and public officials from the previous regime, and mass screening procedures to identify collaborators from the middle and lower ranks of the hierarchy.[i] Cynthia Horne and Monika Nalepa view lustration as a form of vetting, employed to remove or ban perpetrators from participation in the post-authoritarian state.[ii] Lustration, by nature, involves a concerted and overarching state policy. Therefore, isolated disciplinary action or prosecution of specific former regime members do not fall within the definition of lustration.

In practice, policies involving lustration have differed vastly from country to country. For instance, in post-communist Germany, lustration involved: (1) criminal proceedings against Erich Honecker, the former head of state, and his elite supporters; (2) prosecutions against border guards who killed or injured refugees attempting to escape East Germany; (3) dismissals of Socialist Unity Party officials; and (d) prosecutions of State Security Agency (STASI) officials, collaborators and informants.[iii] Thus a combination of criminal and non-criminal justice procedures were adopted within the remit of lustration policies in post-communist Germany. Yet, in most other experiences, lustration has only included measures of a non-criminal justice nature, such as vetting; dismissals; public confessions; the removal of officials from public and economic life; and income and pension cuts.

The European experience

The European experience with respect to lustration points to four important lessons. First, lustration has a tendency to be overbroad in scope. Lustration laws can extend beyond the police and military, and be used against the media and academia. For example, Poland introduced a new lustration law in 2007, which drastically altered the scope of its original Lustration Act of 1997.  The number of people subject to vetting would have increased from around 36,000 people to 400,000-700,000 people.  Moreover, the new law called for the vetting of journalists, academics and actors who may have been influential, but certainly did not drive policy in communist Poland. Fortunately, Poland’s constitutional court declared the relevant articles of the new law unconstitutional.

Second, lustration often lacks credibility due to its reliance on incomplete information. By the time East Germany collapsed in 1989, the STASI had amassed files on approximately four million East Germans, and a further two million West Germans. The declassification of these secret files – compiled by secret police with the aid of collaborators and informants – represented a central tenet of lustration in post-communist Germany. However, in the last days of the security state, East German officials made it a priority to destroy evidence, burning and shredding what they could before their offices were occupied. 

According to Horne, informants and secret police agents had incentives to falsify information. Such incentives included rewards for providing information, and the need to protect friends and family who were under suspicion by the security state. In this context, the veracity of the information contained in the files, as well as the incomplete documentation due to conscientious efforts to destroy evidence, seriously skewed findings.

Third, poorly planned and executed lustration measures have resulted in unemployment and further criminality, which has exacerbated conflict rather than promoted peace. In Ukraine, the 2014 lustration law banned certain military and police actors from occupying their positions for a period of ten years, resulting in significant unemployment. The United Nations has cautioned against the mass removal of public officials – particularly military personnel – who are unable to find alternative jobs, as they ‘constitute a significant security risk and represent a threat to the transition itself.’ Meanwhile, even outside Europe, in post-Ba’athist Iraq, indiscriminate lustration measures involving demilitarisation resulted in large-scale unemployment and political violence. Following the 2003 Iraq War, the dismantling of the military apparatus under the guise of lustration drove a number of disillusioned military personnel towards extremist groups such as the Islamic State.

Finally, lustration is often associated with political revenge. The 1996 Resolution of the Council of Europe stipulates that ‘the key to peaceful coexistence and a successful transition process lies in striking the delicate balance of providing justice without seeking revenge.’ However, in multiple states across Eastern Europe, lustration measures were used as a means of exacting political revenge and pursuing personal vendettas. Following the screening of Czechoslovakia’s military counterintelligence service, only 117 out of 7,000 members retained their positions due to their links with the ousted communist regime. 

Furthermore, in post-communist Albania, a lustration Verification Committee (made up of the ruling Democratic Party members) blocked 139 members of opposition parties from participating in elections.[iv] More recently in Turkey, following a failed coup in July 2016, President Erdogan dismissed 50,000 civil servants, in addition to military officials, academics, and judges suspected of sympathising with opposition groups. Lustration can therefore be used to enable witch-hunts and scapegoating, rather than genuine accountability. Such politically motivated lustration is likely to perpetuate a cycle of conflict, and impede meaningful peace and reconciliation.

Conclusion: Lustration in Sri Lanka?

Lustration measures are not novel to Sri Lanka. In fact, former head of state Sirimavo Bandaranaike was subjected to civic disabilities following her election defeat in 1977. She was removed from Parliament, and prohibited from voting or contesting at elections for a period of seven years. The question of lustration may become relevant again as post-war Sri Lanka attempts to advance accountability within its military apparatus.

The European experience, however, points to several risks. First, lustration policies meant for the military could later be expanded to target media personnel and academics. Second, lustration based on incomplete information could seriously jeopardise the credibility of the process. Third, the large-scale and indiscriminate purging of lower ranking military personnel in Sri Lanka could result in mass unemployment, criminality and violence. Finally, lustration used purely for political revenge could be perceived as witch-hunting and scapegoating, and undermine peace and accountability. If Sri Lanka chooses to enter the realm of lustration to address military impunity, policymakers and human rights practitioners must consider these risks. Misguided or mismanaged lustration could fail to advance accountability, and even impede peace and reconciliation.

Shamara Wettimuny has an MSc and BSc in International Relations and History from the London School of Economics. She currently works at Verité Research, a Colombo-based think tank. The views expressed in this article are her own. 

Notes:
[i] Susanne Karstedt, ‘Coming to Terms with the Past in Germany after 1945 and 1989: Public Judgments on Procedures and Justice’, (1998), at 16.
[ii] Cynthia M. Horne, ‘Transitional Justice: Vetting and Lustration’, Forthcoming in Dov Jacobs (ed.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (E. Elgar), at 10; M. Nalepa, ‘Lustration,’ in L. Stan and N. Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2013)
at 46.
[iii] Karstedt, at 22.
[iv] Robert Austin and Jonathan Ellison, ‘Post-Communist Transitional Justice in Albania’ (2008), at 388.

மூதூரில் முஸ்லிம்கள் வெளியேற்றம்! பதற்ற நிலையை கட்டுப்பாட்டில் கொண்டுவந்த அதிரடிப்படை




MAY 16, 2017

திருகோணமலை, மூதூர் - செல்வநகர் பகுதியில் ஏற்பட்டுள்ள அசாதாரண நிலையை தொடர்ந்து அங்கிருந்து முஸ்லிம் மக்கள் வெளியேற்றப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தகவல்கள் தெரிவிக்கின்றன.
இன்று மாலை ஏற்பட்ட அசாதாரண நிலையை அடுத்து குறித்த பகுதியில் இருந்து வெளியேறியுள்ள முஸ்லிம் மக்கள் தோப்பூர் பகுதியில் உள்ள பள்ளிவாசல் ஒன்றில் தஞ்சமடைந்துள்ளதாகவும் தெரிவிக்கப்படுகின்றது.
மூதூர் - செல்வநகர் பகுதியில் உள்ள காணியில் தங்கியிருந்த முஸ்லிம் மக்களே வெளியேறியுள்ளதாக அங்கிருக்கும் எமது செய்தியாளர் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.
குறித்த காணியில் தங்கியிருந்த மக்களை வெளியேறுமாறு தெரிவித்து பொலிஸ் நிலையத்தில் பிக்கு ஒருவரால் முறைப்பாடு செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தகவல்கள் தெரிவிக்கின்றன.
இந்நிலையில், இன்று மாலை இனந்தெரியாத நபர்களினால் குறித்த காணியில் தங்கியிருந்த மக்களின் குடியிருப்புகளுக்கு கல் வீசப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தெரிவிக்கப்படுகின்றது.
இதனையடுத்து ஏற்பட்ட அசாதாரண நிலையை தொடர்ந்து அந்த பகுதியில் இருந்து சுமார் 1000-1200 முஸ்லிம் மக்கள் வெளியேறியுள்ளதாக தெரிவிக்கப்படுகின்றது.
அந்தப் பகுதியில் குடியிருந்த மக்களை அவ்விடத்தில் இருந்து வெளியேறுமாறு தெரிவித்ததோடு, இது விகாரைக்குச் சொந்தமான காணி என்றும் நேற்றைய தினம் அந்த மக்களை வற்புறுத்தியுள்ளனர்.
இந்நிலையில் அங்கிருந்த மக்களின் குடியிருப்புக்கள் மீது இனம் தெரியாத நபர்களினால் மேற்கொள்ளப்பட்ட கல்லெறித் தாக்குதலினால் இந்த அசாதாரண சூழ்நிலை ஏற்பட்டுள்ளது.
இரு மதக் குழுக்களிடையே ஏற்பட்ட இந்த அசாதாரண சூழ்நிலையினை அடுத்து அங்கு அதிரடிப்படையினர் இறக்கப்பட்டுள்ளனர்.
இதேவேளை, இந்த அசாதாரண சூழ்நிலையினை அடுத்து உயர் மட்டக் குழுவினரிடையேயான சந்திப்பொன்று நாளைக் காலை 9.30 அளவில் இடம்பெறவுள்ளதாக தகவல்கள் வெளியாகியுள்ளன.
இதற்கிடையில், அந்த பகுதியில் ஏற்பட்ட அமைதியின்மை கட்டுப்பாட்டிற்குள் கொண்டு வரப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
தோப்பூர் பகுதியில் தற்போது விசேட அதிரடி படை குவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதுடன், பாதுகாப்பு உறுதிப்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ளதுடன் பதற்றமான சூழ்நிலையும் கட்டுப்பாட்டிற்குள் கொண்டுவரப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தகவல் வெளியாகியுள்ளது.

Jaffna uni students protest against transferring Vithya murder case to Colombo


Home
16 May  2017
Hundreds of students at the University of Jaffna protested today against the transfer of the trial for the rape and murder of a Punguditivu student to a Colombo High Court.

The request to be transferred by the accused in the case of the rape and murder of Vithya Sivaloganathan has sparked protest across the North-East, with the victim’s family strongly opposing the move.

The protesting students also called for accountability and progress in the case of the murder of two Tamil students by Sri Lankan police and were joined by staff members.

Related Articles: 

Sensible answer from PM to the President!

Sensible answer from PM to the President!

May 16, 2017

Among his many fact checking and fact gathering programs to justify the move towards a Cabinet reshuffle, President Maithripala Sirisena has picked up an allegation against a certain faction of the political sphere. He has telephoned Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe and has told him that certain people supporting Wickramasinghe and working under him are unofficially collecting commissions and bribes from projects.

"That cannot be true," the Prime Minister has replied. "How can that be? My source of information is accurate. I can prove it to you," the President has said. 
 
"Please do not take the responsibility to prove these allegations. What are the projects we have started for my people to take bribes? All projects are just plans. You have delayed approving them for months. People of your party are raising various facts to postpone these projects,such as the Hombantota port development. So how can my people bribe from non existing projects? Before all these allegations please approve these projects then I will take measure to prevent bribery and corruption," Wickramasinghe has replied. 
 
The confused President has said, " That is also true," and has hung up the phone.

EU Grants GSP Plus Despite Conditions Not Being Met

The EU has announced today that Sri Lanka will receive GSP Plus from 19th May, 2017
This is despite the Government not conforming to two conditions that the EU had earlier said, should be demonstrated before the suspension of GSP Plus was lifted. These two conditions related to the public releasing of an internationally compliant draft Counter-Terrorism Act (CTA) and a draft Amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, both of which had to be tabled before Parliament.   
In both these cases, the leaked versions of the drafts revealed significant problems with their contents. In the case of the draft CTA, the leaked version by the Sunday Times recently indicated that the offence of espionage had been surreptitiously slipped in while omitting the term ‘espionage.’
The draft CTA terrorizes the ‘gathering of confidential information’ if it adversely affects public security and contradicts the Right to Information Act of 2016. Sri Lanka’s RTI Act, hailed as the third best in the world, has several restrictions on giving of information including national security but leaves out ‘public security’ as a ground on which a denial can be based due to the unclear meaning of that term.  In addition the CTA terrorizes any person who writes or speaks in a way that harms ‘unity’ despite this term also being unclear as legal experts have pointed out. 
Where the CCP amendment is concerned, this still leaves discretion in the hands of the police to refuse immediate legal counsel to suspects.   
Former Secretary to the Ministry of Justice Nihal Jayawickrama called the draft ‘horrendous’ saying that he felt sick after reading it. He professed doubt that this draft could have had the involvement of Sri Lankan experts. Prominent legal analyst and a member of Sri Lanka’s Right to Information Commission Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena fiercely critiqued the Cabinet approved CTA to replace the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), pointing out that this proposed a ‘cure that was far worse than the disease.’
The CTA’s clauses that give the power to issue detention orders to ‘common or garden path Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIGs) advised by the Officer-in-Charge (OIC)’ was pointed to be a clear incentive to torture of detainees. Blisteringly critical of ‘blinkered negotiations’ so far,  Pinto-Jayawardena asked as to how any faith could be placed in effective ‘monitoring’ to ensure revisions to the draft even though this had been promised by the EU through a Working Committee after the additional tariff preference was granted.
GSP Plus was suspended in 2010 under the Rajapaksa Presidency after an Experts Report castigated Sri Lanka’s Rule of Law record. For example, the report found that though a domestic law prohibiting torture was enacted in 1994, this has had little impact due to bad investigations, lackadaisical prosecutions and a legal system plagued with delays and other failures.
It was also concluded that the judicial and administrative infrastructure was neither adequate nor effective in regard to providing a remedy for violations of rights. The suspension had adverse consequences as the EU had been Sri Lanka’s biggest export market accounting for nearly one-third of the country’s global exports with apparel being key.
Announcing the lifting of the suspension today, the EU stated in a press release that ‘this is also a vote of confidence from the European Union that the Sri Lankan Government will maintain the progress it has made in implementing the international conventions. At the same time, no one is pretending that the situation is perfect. The process of replacing the Prevention of Terrorism Act still needs to be completed.’

Read More