Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, March 24, 2017

Image
March 24, 2017
Former Director General of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption Ms. Dilrukshi Dias Wickremesinghe had to leave the position not due to any weakness in her duties but due to a political reason says the Chief Whip of the Opposition JVP Parliamentarian Anura Dissanayaka.
When Ms. Dilrukshi Wickremesinghe was made to resign investigations in connection with a powerful minister of the government and a state minister, who had also served as ministers of the previous Mahinda Rajapaksa regime, had begun said Mr. Dissanayaka speaking in Parliament on Thursday (23rd). He said investigations against a son of a MP who acted with the powers of a minister too had commenced when Ms. Wickremesinghe had to leave the post.
Mr. Dissanayaka said a case against the former first lady was about to be filed after investigations regarding a complaint against her had been completed and added only one case has been filed after the resignation of the former Director General of the Bribery Commission.
100 complaints lodged before the FCID have been withdrawn said Mr. Anura Dissanayaka adding that handing over complaints to FCID has been stopped at present.
Frauds and corruption committed behind the war should be revealed to the country said Mr. Dissanayaka participating in the Parliamentary debate on a resolution to increase funds to carry out raids by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption.

Campus Torture


article_image
by H. L. Seneviratne- 

Professor A. N. I Ekanayaka deserves our gratitude for his perceptive analysis and forthright condemnation (The Island, March 15, 2017) of the barbaric culture of ragging that has been afflicting our universities for a long time. Few would disagree with Professor Ekanayaka’s statement that there is no "decent" of "mild" ragging, and all ragging should be eliminated root and branch. Ragging is no different from any other form of oppression of the weak by the strong, and thus, a rag-free educational environment is a human right. We already have a law against raggingin our law books, but it’s not news to anybody that there is no rule of law in our resplendent land.

While we are a society with the trappings of modernity, in many spheres of thought and action, we are a feudal society. It is infeudal societies that the severity of punishment for a crime varies inversely with the perpetrator’s social status – the higher the criminal’s social status, the lighter the punishment and vice versa. We see this almost daily in alleged criminals who are power figures checking in to hospitals no sooner than they are remanded. Although individual students may not be power figures, the rag mafia within campuses is a power of considerable clout -- it is the handmaiden of political parties--so it is in keeping with their direct or indirect power that they can rag innocent freshmen to death, sometimes literally,and still get away with it.

The culture of ragging is an extension of the political culture, which since about independence has been on a steep downward path to moralbankruptcy, dragging the society along with it towards a more general bankruptcy. This has now become pervasive, afflicting every institution, structure and process in our society. Thus, we do find a difference in the degree of depravity between the ragging culture of about the 1950s and today. The change towards increasingly uglier raggingwas gradual, but runs parallel to the enthronement of "our culture" in 1956, and more directly, to the abandonment of English as the medium of instruction, which has functioned to narrow both the world view and employment prospects of graduates.

We see other parallels that illustrate the general malaise afflicting the society, of which the ragging culture is only a symptom. The big talk about eradication of ragging parallels the big talk about the eradication of dengue fever. Both reflect a societal illness as do many other phenomena, like the culture of the country’s highest institution, the parliament. Supposedly a forum of dignified discussion and exchange of ideas, it is in fact a marketplace of fishmongers shouting obscenities at each other. As reported in the press, in addition to their salary, benefits, car permits (which they permit themselves to sell) and other perks, they also get an "attendance allowance" of some Rs. 4500 or so for each attendance in parliament, the very duty for which they are compensated with all the perks listed above in the first place. Not that parliamentarians necessarily need academic qualifications, but it is shocking that, according to press reports, some 94 or so MPs in a parliament of 225 members do not even have their O Levels. Clearly, something is rotten in the state of Sri Lanka.

The ragging culture cannot be eliminated until the society is cured of its general and systemic malaise. There was some sense that this problem was at least understood when a "good governance" regime was elected in January 2015. But increasingly it has been looking more and more like what it replaced, thereby guaranteeing itself a kick on the butt at the next election. The likely replacement can only be described as "The Horror, the Horror".

To act, the academics and university administrators do not need to wait till the society is transformed. On the contrary, as intellectuals and leaders of thought who presumably understand that the ragging culture is the symptom and not the disease, it is up to them to act as the engine that ignites the transformative process. They can take action both to treat the symptoms, and to persuade the powers to treat the disease. The former involves carrying out the existing legal provisions to deal with the ragging mafia on each campus, and the latter the use of their collective knowledge and strength to enlighten and influence the powers.

Hambantota Port Deal – Getting curious by the day

Hambantota Port Deal – Getting curious by the day
Mar 24, 2017
Nishantha Muthuhettigama sent a letter to President Maithripala Sirisena stating that the letter regarding the Concessionary Agreement on the Port of Hambantota sent by Cabinet Secretary S. Abeysinghe to the Secretary of his ministry (P&S), was contradictory to the "so called decision" taken at the Cabinet meeting. Keerthi Tennakoon Executive Director CAFFE had make a statement of this matter.
He said , The document prepared by Cabinet Secretary S.Abeysinghe states that "it was decided to grant approval to the proposal (1) in paragraph 13 of the memorandum dated 2017 -03- 17 by the minister of special assignments and chairman of the ministerial committee on development of Hambantota Port, subject to amending the concession agreement attached as annex II to the memorandum, as proposed in the note dated 2017 - 03 -21 by the minister of special assignments and the chairman of the said ministerial committee..."
However Muthuhettigama in his letter states "during the Cabinet meeting, held under your chairmanship, on 21 March, the Ministers considered the Concessionary Agreement on the Port of Hambantota sent by Minister Sarath Amunugama (17/0901/753/002) and my note (no 17/0598/737/012), as the acting Minister.”
Campaign for Free and Fair Elections (CaFFE) notes this development with distress because this is not the first time that there was an attempt to manipulate this deal. This also makes us question the authenticity of the cabinet decision presented to the public on Wednesday.

No transparency
We noted that State Minister for International Trade Sujeewa Senasinghe repeated, during the cabinet Press Briefing, that this deal will be transparent unlike the agreements made during the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration. However the past behaviour of the government regarding the Hambantota Port Deal as well as the letter by Muthuhettigama, clearly indicates that the negotiating process is anything but transparent. Thus CaFFE fears that deal with between Sri Lanka and China Merchant Port Holdings Company (CM Port) might be another adverse one for the country, much like the deals under the Rajapaksa administration.
What is more striking is that Muthuhettigama’s implication that the opinions of the President has been ignored by some sections of the cabinet. 

"During the Cabinet meeting it was decided to appoint a five member Cabinet Subcommittee on the matter and to consider the two documents sent. However the letter sent by Cabinet Secretary S. Abeysinghe to the Secretary of his ministry presents a contradictory version of what transpired," he said.
President Sirisena urges caution
President Maithripala Sirisena, after considering the Concessionary Agreement of the Port of Hambantota sent by Minister Sarath Amunugama (17/0901/753/002), sent a note dated 2017 March 20th, to the Cabinet urging them to take a decision considering all the complications involved.
"When considering this document, we must keep in mind the balance of payment issues faced by the country, IMF recommendations and the discussions and agreements that we have carried out with diplomats, including Chinese officials," he said in his note. Is this recommendation, considered seriously? is one of the many questions coming out by the letter.
Cabinet press briefing
On Wednesday co cabinet spokesperson Minister Gayantha Karunathilake said that the Cabinet of ministers decided to appoint a Cabinet Subcommittee chaired by Minister of Special Assignments Sarath Amunugama to oversee the implementation of the concession agreement of the Port of Hambantota between Sri Lanka and China Merchant Port Holdings Company.
“Concession agreement of the Port of Hambantota which is to be signed between Sri Lanka and China Merchant Port Holdings Company (CMPort) in China aims at preparing future plans, financial provision, operational promotion and development of infrastructure including completed phase I and II and proposed phase III. The Cabinet of Ministers has decided to enter into the above agreement which is cleared by the Attorney General and to appoint a Cabinet Subcommittee chaired by Minister of Special Assignments Sarath Amunugama to supervise its implementation,” he said.
The PPP operator is to be capitalized with an amount of US $ 1.4 billion and CMPort is to invest 80% of the transaction value, which is US $ 1.12 billion. 

AshWaru Colombo

Lead-picSaturday, 25 March 2017
  • Follows US rate hike and stubbornly-high private sector credit
  • Says “precautionary measure” to contain inflation through credit expansion 
  • Noted improvement in fiscal operations and meeting 2016 Budget deficit target 
  • Expects inflation to moderate after adjustments to new taxes 
  • Private sector credit decelerated to 20.9% in January from 21.9% at end 2016
logoBowing to expectations, the Central Bank yesterday raised policy rates in step with the US rate hike and to buttress the economy against inflation and stubbornly-high private sector credit, following lower than expected growth numbers for 2016.

Government Trying To Water Down The Right To An Attorney


Colombo Telegraph
By Ruwan Laknath Jayakody and Faizer Shaheid –March 24, 2017
Ruwan Jayakody
Faizer Shaheid
This article has specific emphasis on the latest Bill introduced in the Parliament where the legislature seeks to limit the right of access of any person held in Police custody to an Attorney-at-Law. It craftily uses deceptive words to redirect an Attorney-at-Law to have access to a Police Officer in lieu of the suspect in Police custody.
The Code of Criminal Procedure (Special Provisions) (Amendment) is a Bill put forward by the Ministry of Justice that seeks to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure (Special Provisions) Act, No. 2 of 2013. In the said Bill’s Statement of Legal Effect, provisions in Clause 2 state that it seeks to amend the said Act by the insertion of a Section 6A (a new Section) to it, the legal effect of which is to make provisions to ensure the rights of an Attorney-at-Law who represents a person held in Police custody.
Section 6A(1) of the proposed Bill which purports to allow for the right of an Attorney-at-Law to access a person in the custody of the Police, holds that “an Attorney-at-Law representing a person in police custody shall, from the time such person is taken into custody, be entitled to have access to the police station in which such person is being held in custody, for the purpose of meeting the officer in charge of the police station and making representations to such officer.” An Attorney-at-Law is hired to represent the interests of the client who is the suspect in custody. The client is not the Officer-in-Charge (OIC) of the Police Station in which the suspect is being held in custody. The OIC does not and cannot be legitimately expected to represent the interests of justice (to use a phrase that appears later on in this Bill) of the suspect. Hence, there is an immediate need and direct requirement for the Attorney-at-Law to meet and conduct consultations with the suspect cum client. Section 6A(1) does not recognize the Attorney-at-Law’s right to have access to the client. This is in complete contravention of the principle of due process and the right to a fair trial, not to mention the fact that the suspect under principles of natural law is at all times presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by a competent court of law.
Section 6A(2) of the proposed Bill reads, “The right of an Attorney-at-Law, to have access to the police station, and to make representations, shall not affect the investigations that may be conducted in respect of the person being represented.” While access of an Attorney-at-Law to his/her client in the custody of a Police Officer should be permitted at all times, the right of an Attorney-at-Law should not under any circumstances impinge upon the investigations being conducted by the Police into the involvement of the suspect in the commission of any offence.
Section 6A(3) of the proposed Bill states that while any such Attorney-at-Law shall be permitted entry into the relevant Police station, s/he is to be treated cordially and courteously, and given a fair and patient hearing by the Police Officers attached to the said Police station. The words “cordially” and “courteously” are synonymous and are also not suitable for use in a legal enactment of this nature. It is also the duty of the Police Officers to give a fair hearing and exercise patience during the process of doing so.
Section 6A(4) of the proposed Bill outlines that any such Attorney-at-Law acting and appearing on behalf of the person held in Police custody, is entitled to meet the OIC of the relevant Police station and ascertain certain specified and unspecified information from the said OIC. Section 6A(4)(d) of the proposed Bill however recognizes that while the preceding provisions, respectively, Sections 6A(4)(a), 6A(4)(b) and 6A(4)(c), specify the information that can be obtained as being information pertaining to the offence alleged to have been committed by the client, information pertaining to the date, time and location of the arrest and the date, approximate time and place of production of the suspect before a Magistrate, in the case of the Attorney seeking to ascertain “any other information”, which are unspecified in the context of the proposed Bill, such would only be provided on the grounds that the revealing of such “would not adversely affect the conduct of further investigations and the interests of justice”. The phrase “interests of justice” should entail within it the interests of three parties, namely, the suspect, the victim/s, and the investigating Officers. It is also not specified in this provision as to who is vested with the power of making the value judgment and the call of deciding on as to what information, the revealing of which constitutes an adverse impact on further investigations and the interests of justice.
Section 6A(6) of the proposed Bill holds that the Attorney-at-Law “shall, if he so requests, be allowed to have access to the person in custody, unless such access is prejudicial to the investigation being conducted.” “He” should be changed to a gender neutral term. The extent of the access allowed is not specified. The provision does not define the scope of what is meant by the word ‘prejudicial’. The provision also does not illustrate or define as to who is to make the judgment call with regard to the said matter.
Govt. seeks Rs.288mn to buy vehicles for ministers

2017-03-24
The government today sought Parliament’s approval for spending a total sum of Rs.288.2 million in order to purchase vehicles for several ministers, deputy ministers and state ministers.
Accordingly, the approval was sought for the spending of Rs.42 million to purchase a vehicle for deputy chairman of committees, Rs.82 million on a new vehicle for deputy minister of health, Rs.40 million on a vehicle for minister of plantation industries, Rs.38 million on a vehicle for deputy minister of sports and Rs.86 million on vehicles for the minister and deputy minister of industry and commerce.
Approval was also sought to spend Rs.21.5 million for the official residence of leader of the opposition.
In addition, approval of the House was sought to spend Rs.7.5 billion for the amalgamation of the Housing Development and Finance Corporation (HDFC) and the State Mortgage Bank. (Yohan Perera)
Deputy Minister of HealthRs.82 million
Minister of Plantation IndustriesRs.40 million
Deputy Minister of Sports
Rs.38 million
Deputy Minister of Industry and CommerceRs.86 million
Leader of the OppositionRs.21.5 million
Deputy Chairman of CommitteesRs.42 million

Teen collects orthopedic aids for Sri Lanka's poor


Teen collects orthopedic aids for Sri Lanka's poor

  • By CONNIE CONNOLLY cconnolly@chespub.com-
  • March 24, 2017

EASTON — An Easton High School sophomore who has set her sights high and her embrace of humanity wide is asking the Talbot County community to do the same.

With a 4.0 GPA, a busy schedule, a big heart, and a quick smile, 16-year-old Natasha Panduwawala is determined to make a difference in the lives of Sri Lankans with mobility challenges. She wants them to benefit from this country’s — and this county’s — bounty and generosity, and gain more physical mobility and freedom as a result.


Natasha is collecting orthopedic aids to ship to her parents’ native country of Sri Lanka in two weeks. Her dad Steve, who owns Ceylon Auto Traders on U.S. Route 50 in Easton, is storing donations at his building.
 
So far, Natasha has collected about 150 aids, from crutches to wheelchairs. Her goal is to ship 200.
She has created a website called Movement to Remember: Collecting Orthopedic Aids — Sri Lanka 2017, which lists the items she hopes the community will contribute.

When she’s not working on her charity project, Natasha is co-president of the newly formed National Latin Honor Society, founder and president of EHS’s first-ever Key Club and communications director for Future Business Leaders of America. She plays on the bocce ball team, takes voice lessons and is a member of the Chamber Singers and theater program. She’s taking an AP course, and she already has finished three dual enrollment courses at Chesapeake College.

“We didn’t have a Key Club until Natasha hit here,” guidance counselor Judy Berrange said. “We just love her. She’s doing this for the betterment of everybody else. It’s not self-serving.”

Teen collects orthopedic aids for Sri Lanka's poor
Natasha and her 8-year-old brother Nathan live with their parents, Steve and Manik, in Easton. Although she said her brother is “a real menace,” he advertises Movement to Remember everywhere he goes.
Natasha doesn’t like talking about herself. She turns the focus back to the passion she developed when she visited family last year in Sri Lanka — her grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins who live in and around Sri Lanka’s capital city, Colombo.

One aunt knew Natasha liked seeing other cultures, so she made a point of taking her niece to see the country’s rural poor. What Natasha saw made a deep impression on her and gave her the idea to gather items that may be collecting dust here and send them where they may be more needed.

“My aunt took me to an all-girls orphanage,” Natasha said. “I really wanted to meet them, and I met a girl with mental and physical issues who was raped when she was very young. She had a cane, but I watched her dance and be happy.”

“And I saw beggars. Adults and children were everywhere,” Natasha said. “Many were confined to single spots with a contorted leg. They can’t move and have a normal life.”

Natasha was struck by the fact that children were confined to those spots with a parent. Something as simple as a crutch or walker for the parent could help their children have more freedom, as well.

“I want local people to see these issues here in America and in countries they’ve never heard of, but also to be grateful for what we have here,” said Natasha, who was born in Easton. “So many people from other countries desperately need our help.”

The country her parents, who are U.S. citizens, emigrated from almost 20 years ago formerly was known as Ceylon during British colonial rule until 1972. Since then, it has been known as the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, an island country near southeast India in the Indian Ocean.

Natasha has collected quite a few crutches and walkers, but she’s hoping to get more wheelchairs. She’s gotten requests for orthopedic aids from Sri Lankan military bases, homes for the elderly and rural villages.
 
“I really need a lot more,” she said.

Her parents are “really excited,” Natasha said. “At first, they were reluctant, but they are really, really supportive.”

“I’m so proud of her, I’m gonna cry,” Manik Panduwawala said of her daughter. She is an accountant with the Maryland Transportation Authority in Baltimore. “She has great drive for her age. She comes up with solutions to problems. She knows what she wants.”

“Oh wow, it’s a great thing,” Natasha’s father Steve said. “We support her. We always talk about helping others which is the main thing.”

He has stored collected items in the basement of his business. In some cases, they have been donated, or he has reimbursed people who drop off items they have found at yard sales or Goodwill. The Sri Lanka community of 15 to 20 families in the greater Washington, D.C., area has donated orthopedic aids and money to help with shipping.

Natasha said she and volunteers will have a “packing party” on Sunday, March 26. Some items will be dismantled, and everything will be tied to pallets and then shrink-wrapped. They will travel halfway around the world in sea freighters.

Natasha isn’t sure what the future holds for her after high school. Right now, she’s looking forward to getting her provisional driver’s license in May and traveling by herself to Sri Lanka to visit family in early June. But she has a message to other teens: “You’re much more capable than you think you are,” she said. “You can do so much more than you think you can.”

To see a list of orthopedic aids you can donate for the current or future shipments, visit www.movementtoremember.org or visit the nonprofit’s Facebook page.
 
Follow me on Twitter @connie_stardem.

Hitchcock and Kiorastami

Hitchcock’s vision of evil is also noteworthy in the film. By evil the writer means the human propensity to take gratuitous joy in harming and destroying. The former teacher of the two young murderers acknowledges that he did teach them Nietzsche and that he had continued to hold Nietzsche’s views about the superman, but he found himself finally forced to recognize that there was something in him that balked at murder while there was something in the two young men that made them commit it.

by Izeth Hussain-
( March 25, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) A work of art – a poem, play, novel, film, painting and so on – can be approached at two levels: one is as an art object that represents order wrested from the chaos outside it, and the other is as an art object in relation to the chaos outside it. A total criticism should function at both levels. The writer will illustrate his argument by examining a couple of films by two great directors, Hitchcock and Kiorastami.
Hitchcock’s film Rope appeared in the second half of the ‘forties, after he was well-established as a top Hollywood film director who specialized in thrillers, which was not a genre associated with high brow art. He was seen as belonging essentially to the world of Hollywood entertainment. That image of him changed later when Francois Truffaut, one of the most prestigious of the French New Wave directors, praised him as an exemplar of the high brow art film. Consequently he is now ranked securely with the giants of the cinema such as – to choose some names at random – Chaplin, Eisenstein, Bunuel, Pasolini, Fellini, Antonioni, Kurosava, and Satyajit Ray. Now Kiorastami too tends to be mentioned along with them.

Hitchcock
Some facts are worth mentioning about Hitchcock. In the other arts, literature, music, and painting, the act of creation takes place with the artist working alone by himself. In film the central creative figure is certainly the Director but the Producer has a say in what goes on and crucial contributions are made by the actors, the script writer, the photographer, and the composer of the background music. The film is therefore the result of a collaborative enterprise but the great Directors make their distinctive impress on every one of their films. Hitchcock was very much what the French now call the auteur, the author, of his films: he worked out every detail in his head in advance of the actual shooting of the film, which for him was a dull anti-climax compared to the lonely creative work that preceded it. As authentic creative artists usually have something odd about them, a fertile lack of balance, two facts about Hitchcock are worth noting. One was that he never went out in the evenings except when one of his films was being shot, which necessitated some amount of socializing. The other was that he never learnt to drive a car. As a boy in England he was subjected to a strict Catholic upbringing by a disciplinarian father who, over some minor misdemeanor, sent him to the police station with a note. The officer in charge after reading it told Hitchcock that if he were ever again guilty of that kind of misdemeanor he would be put behind bars for a long period. The experience was so traumatic that Hitchcock never learnt to drive because that would sooner or later put him at the mercy of the police over some traffic offense. Authentic creative artists are sensitive to the darker side of life.
The film Rope (1948) was based on the famous Leopold and Loeb murder case of 1924. They were extraordinarily brilliant Chicago University students from very wealthy backgrounds who were inspired by the writings of the German philosopher Frederick Nietzsche into committing what they regarded as the perfect undetectable murder. They believed that they belonged to Nietzsche’s category of supermen to whom the social standards of right and wrong did not apply, and that they were privileged to commit any crime including murder. They were obsessed with crime and committed many acts of petty crime before they decided on the murder of 14-year old Bobby Franks who was also from a wealthy Chicago background. They were caught and the case became famous both for its gratuitous murder and for the brilliant advocacy for abandoning the death penalty argued by the defense counsel Clarence Darrow. Hitchcock based his film on a play by Patrick Hamilton which dealt only with the murder while ignoring the court case altogether, later to become the focus of another film.
The present writer saw the Hitchcock film in 1948 or a little later, and on seeing a DVD version recently has been surprised by how much of the details of the film had remained in the writer’s mind over a period of almost seven decades. That attests to the power of Hitchcock as a Director. Had the writer’s guru of that time, Professor Ludowyck, asked him to make a critique of the film, he would have done so using the standards of the New Criticism then in vogue in the US, the masterwork of which was Cleanth Brook’s The Well-wrought Urn. He would have praised it as a tour de force because it keeps the viewer’s unflagging interest while the plot is known and the action takes place, except for a single scene, within one flat, and he would have pointed out how all the elements fit together to make a coherent work of art. That would have been a critique of the art object as representing order wrested from the chaos outside it.
Abbas Kiarostami
But today, in Sri Lanka certainly, it is impossible to keep the world outside from invading the art object. A satisfactory critique will have to note how value is given to the ordinary. The film begins with a street scene in which someone is helped to cross the street and it ends with voices outside the flat raised in concern over the shots that have been fired inside it. There is the maternal solicitude shown by the maid, and there is the altruistic concern over the sick wife of the bibliophile Professor. The value of the ordinary is a frequent theme in Hitchcock’s films, apparent for instance in the heroism shown by ordinary people in Rear Window. The value of the ordinary seems to be something that is profoundly American. Who else but one of the quintessential American poets of the last century, William Carlos Williams, could have made a memorable poem out of a piece of broken glass?
Hitchcock’s vision of evil is also noteworthy in the film. By evil the writer means the human propensity to take gratuitous joy in harming and destroying. The former teacher of the two young murderers acknowledges that he did teach them Nietzsche and that he had continued to hold Nietzsche’s views about the superman, but he found himself finally forced to recognize that there was something in him that balked at murder while there was something in the two young men that made them commit it. There was evil in the two young men that could not be explained away in terms of upbringing and background. The contrast is provided by Arthur Penn’s classic Bonny and Clyde in which the two outlaws are seen sympathetically as being largely the victims of deprivations imposed on the under-privileged. Penn’s vision is that of Whitman, a vision consistent with the American Dream of a perfectible society, while Hitchcock shares the vision of evil of Melville and Hawthorn and Henry James.
Finally, Rope which was first shown in 1948 can be seen as prophetic of the American Empire which has been ravaging a good part of the world since then. It is not accidental that the Leopold-Loeb case inspired fiction, plays, and two films, apart from articles and essays – the Wikipedia account fails to mention Andre Gide’s Caves of the Vatican. The reason is that it tells us something important about Western civilization, at least the imperialist side of it. Nietzsche was the guiding philosopher behind the Nazis, and he has been the undeclared guiding philosopher behind Western imperialism: the world seen in terms of a dichotomy between supermen and human insects whom the West has butchered by the million. Hitchcock’s Rope tells us why the Americans are so fanatically supportive of apartheid Israel.
In the remaining space the writer will make just three points about Kiorastami’s film Like someone in love. It is a film made in Japan with Japanese actors by an Iranian Director. It attests to his universalism. Secondly, a young Japanese awakens to reality, an important theme in western films. Thirdly in affluent Japan young women are still forced into prostitution by economic hardship: the film is a devastating indictment of contemporary capitalism.
Palestinians need a hero, not a gutless Guterres




2017-03-24

The stench that wafted across world politics last Friday was unbearable. It originated from a place where there was once an old slaughterhouse. The place now houses the 39-storey United Nations building, one of the most photographed world monuments. The building overlooking the East River has an architectural aura, but, by no means, is its glassy exterior symbolic of the sordid state of affairs inside, with matters peace and justice often undermined by powerful nations. 

Last Friday was one such day. Underscoring the impotency of the United Nations, its new Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, shattered the hope for peace in West Asia when he ordered the removal of a report critical of Israel from a UN website, just two days after the document was released. By timidly displaying his inability to stand up for justice and stand by Rima Khalef, who, as the head of the UN’s Economic and Social Commission for West Asia (ESCWA), commissioned the report, Guterres seems to have compromised his socialism with which he wooed the people of Portugal to become prime minister in 1995.  While Khalef resigned in disgust, the wounded Palestinians, the victims of Israel’s apartheid system, cried: ‘Et tu Guterres’.

The secretary general’s surrender is so disheartening that it pushes peace activists to long for the old abattoir at Turtle Bay, for the blood of the slaughtered cattle would have smelt like jasmine, in comparison to the smell of putrid power politics of the UN system. It is now becoming clear that the new UN Secretary General succumbed to pressure from the United States and withdrew the report, although the report’s authors, Richard Falk and Virginia Tilley, widely respected for their global justice activism, insisted that this was only a research paper that did not reflect the views of ESCWA or the UN.  Palestine’s UN envoy Riyad Mansour told reporters on Wednesday that “bullying tactics and intimidation” led to UN withdrawal of the report that accused Israel of practising apartheid.
 A UN spokesman, however, said the organisation did not have a problem with the content of the report but rather with Khalef’s failure to follow procedure prior to publication.

“The secretary-general cannot accept that an under secretary-general or any other senior UN official that reports to him would authorise the publication under the UN name, under the UN logo, without consulting the competent departments and even himself,” he said.

 Whatever the explanation for the removal of the report, Guterres appears as gutless as his predecessor. The present controversy reminds us of the Richard Goldstein report on Israel’s 2008 Gaza war. It was commissioned by the then Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The report accused both Israel and the Palestinian resistance group Hamas of war crimes. In indiscriminate Israeli attacks, some 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, perished -- half of the victims being children. 
 Later Goldstein withdrew his report solely on the basis of Israel’s claim that it had no policy of targeting civilians. Independent analysts ascribe the death of the report to US and Israeli pressure on Goldstein. 

 In another UN retreat under pressure, Ban last year withdrew Saudi Arabia from a list of nations that had committed war crimes against children, after the oil-rich kingdom warned it would stop its funds for UN programmes. 

 Such pressure and bullying tactics were also evident in recent US statements defending Israel.  America’s UN ambassador Nikki Haley dismissed the ESCWA report as “anti-Israel propaganda” and said, “The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.”

On Monday, a week after US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson indicated that the US might withdraw from the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, Haley slammed the council for its “anti-Israel agenda”. She told the Council: “The so-called ‘Agenda Item 7’ discredits the standing of the only UN body specifically designed to address the state of global human rights by allowing nations to distract from their own abuses back home by churning out anti-Israel propaganda. As a result, the United States will not participate in discussions under Agenda Item 7 at the Human Rights Council in Geneva, other than to vote against the outrageous, one-sided, anti-Israel resolutions that so diminish what the Human Rights Council should be, and we encourage other Council members who purport to be defenders of human rights to do the same.” If Haley, in her zealous frenzy, is determined to protect and reward Israel’s atrocities and cannot accept the ESCWA report, then she should at least read Jimmy Carter’s 2006 best seller ‘Palestine: Peace not Apartheid’. Carter, like all US presidents since 1948, was no enemy of Israel. Defending his book, Carter said Israel’s policy in the West Bank represented instances of apartheid worse than what was in South Africa. 

“When Israel does occupy this territory deep within the West Bank, and connects the 200-or-so settlements with each other, with a road, and then prohibits the Palestinians from using that road, or in many cases even crossing the road, this perpetrates even worse instances of apartness, or apartheid, than we witnessed even in South Africa,” Carter said. 

Falk and Tilley in their ESCWA report explain more than what Carter saw. They recommended the international community to intensify the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanction) campaign against Israel until it abandons its apartheid policy that dehumanises the Palestinians. It is to the UN system that the Palestinian people turn to realise their dream of freedom. But the world body has been, in effect, an accomplice in the crime against the Palestinians.

 It started with Resolution 181 which partitioned Palestine in 1947 in what was seen as a travesty of justice, giving the 30 percent Jewish population, mostly European immigrants, 55 percent of the land and the Palestinians who formed the 70 percent of the population 45 percent. Since then, the UN has been virtually offering its facilities for the United States and Israel to continue their might-is-right policies.

 The existence of agencies such as the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to help the displaced Palestinians will not absolve the UN of its complicity. Guterres should have resisted the US pressure, for it is better to serve the world body as a true soldier of peace for one term rather than serving two terms as an agent of injustice.


Israel rebuffs Trump’s push to curb settlements

Like Obama, Trump is asking Israel to curb settlement construction while reassuring it that US aid is guaranteed no matter what it does.Tess ScheflanActiveStills

Ali Abunimah-24 March 2017

The Trump administration has failed to reach agreement with Israel on curbing its construction of settlements in the occupied West Bank.

On Thursday, the White House said that during four days of “intensive discussions” with the Israelis, senior US officials “reiterated President Trump’s concerns regarding settlement activity in the context of moving towards a peace agreement.”

But at the end of the talks no agreement was reached on meeting those concerns.

Surprise

Israeli leaders had been ecstatic at Trump’s election, believing that he would give them a green light to accelerate colonization of occupied Palestinian land.

All of Israel’s settlements are illegal under international law.

Settler leaders received a warm welcome at the president’s January inauguration and one of Trump’s first key nominations was for an ambassador to Israel who has personally helped raise millions of dollars to build settlements in the West Bank.

David Friedman, who is currently being sued by US citizens and Palestinians for his role in this land theft, was confirmed as ambassador by the Republican-controlled Senate on Thursday. The 52-46 vote broke down largely along party lines.

But despite these signals, the administration surprised Israeli leaders just days after taking office by issuing a public warning to Israel over its accelerating settlement building.

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the White House last month, Trump reiterated that “I’d like to see you hold back on settlements for a little bit.”

“We’ll work something out,” the president assured, though his first major effort to do so has clearly failed.

Little change

Trump’s insistence on some form of limitation means that his policy differs little from that of his predecessors who also paid lip-service to curbing settlements.

The Washington Post described Trump’s desire to limit settlements as “a precondition” for having Saudi Arabia and other so-called “moderate” Arab states “join a regional peace process.”

Indeed, the Trump administration is making a show of reaching out, even to Palestinians. During a visit to the region earlier this month, the administration’s envoy Jason Greenblatt visited Jalazone refugee camp near Ramallah to speak to Palestinian youth and “understand their daily experiences.”

Met w/ youth leaders in the Jalazone refugee camp near Ramallah to understand their daily experiences
The White House statement added that the US-Israeli delegations discussed improving the economy in the West Bank and the “necessity” of fulfilling international aid pledges for the reconstruction of Gaza “in ways that benefit the population without further empowering Hamas or other terrorist organizations.”

This too is little changed from the attempts by previous administrations to promote “economic peace” to pacify the occupied Palestinian population and bolster leaders handpicked by the US.

The Israelis have noticed the similarities too. “A senior minister who sits in the diplomatic-security cabinet said he met with Netanyahu this week and found him very worried,” the Tel Aviv newspaper Haaretz reported on Monday. The reason: Donald Trump.

“There’s enormous pressure on him over the settlements from Trump,” the minister said. Given Netanyahu’s dependence on the settler movement he has supported for his entire political career, the Israeli prime minister is cornered.

Last month, Israel’s parliament passed a law to facilitate the theft of Palestinian land for settlements.

“That’s also why he isn’t going to the AIPAC conference in Washington at the end of the month,” the minister told Haaretz, referring to the powerful Israel lobby group. “He doesn’t yet have anything to bring to Trump. The feeling I got is that he’s starting to miss Obama.”

Path to failure

Despite the years of demonization of Barack Obama by Israel and its surrogates, this is a tacit admission of a plain fact: he was in reality, the most pro-Israel US president in history.

Months before he left office, Obama signed an agreement boosting US military aid to Israel to a record $3.8 billion a year starting in 2019.

And because Trump’s policy is so much like Obama’s, he will find himself on the same well-trodden path to failure in achieving his stated goal of a peace agreement.

Trump claims to be the consummate dealmaker, ready to upend longstanding relations with friends and rivals alike if that’s what it takes to put “America first.”

He even threatened China that he would abandon years of US policy on not recognizing Taiwan unless Beijing met his terms on trade.

But in his first budget proposal – which slashes assistance to the poorest and most vulnerable Americans – Trump assured Israel that US aid would remain untouched.

That’s why Trump finds he has no more influence with Israel than the previous occupant of the White House.

While the talks between Israel and the administration are “ongoing,” according to the White House, so is Israel’s unrelenting theft of Palestinian land.

That won’t change as long as Israel pays no price for its actions.