Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Untitled-1
logoThursday, 16 March 2017

Young scientist Shalini Thiruchittampalam was quite eloquent and with subtle humour articulated her research work ‘Probable chemical compounds from Sri Lankan flora for the treatment of neurodegeneration’ at the SLAYS 3MT thesis competition and bagged both the Best Presenter Award and People’s Choice Award.

All those who were present were naturally ageing as time moved on and her findings through the use of computational methods – she indicated that if she was to use the usual laboratory methods on her choice of flora extracts one after the other she may actually find herself succumbing to the very diseases that she wants to find cures for! – and the logic of the process was quite powerful with the concept simply explained. I am sure all were wishing that she will find her chemical policemen from the local flora quite quickly before many more days and years ticked by.

In research and in science unless you communicate your work is not complete. On that day 11 finalists – all young scientists – went on to explain their research work to an audience that largely consists of both local and international group of scientists. All were quite impressive and the nature of areas that each one of them engaged also had so much potential for Sri Lanka.

This list of 11 came from a select list of 75 semi-finalists. As a participant in listening to the three minutes from some of those 75 I can vouch that all who participated were quite impressed with the young talent on display throughout the process. One may have ultimately won as that is the nature of a contest but through that event Sri Lankan research received a new positioning for sure.

Judges were absolutely happy to hear and experience the depth and the spread of research taking place within our universities. If there was ever a doubt on soft skills of researchers, this certainly laid those to complete rest. It was quite difficult to select the finalists but this too had to happen. 

Untitled-166

SLAYS and 3MT

This exciting event took place on 28 February and 1 March, within the SLAYS Open Forum 2017 organised jointly by Sri Lankan Academy of Young Scientists (SLAYS) and National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (NSF) in collaboration with the Coordinating Secretariat for Science Technology and Innovation (COSTI) of the Ministry of Science Technology and Research.

Three Minute Thesis (3MT) is a research communication competition developed by The University of Queensland, Australia which challenges research students to present a compelling oration on their thesis and its significance in just three minutes to a non-specialist audience.

As per information available from University of Queensland, since the inception of the program in 2008, the competition has grown to an international event and universities in almost all continents are holding their regional competitions. SLAYS provided leadership in introducing the program to Sri Lanka and should really be commended for a positive initiative. The potential impact and the growth potential by being a participant are sure to leave a lasting impression if one values the experience. All may not win but all will definitely grow up by being a participant.

When you have to give a three-minute speech with one PowerPoint slide covering your entire research work really calls for organised thinking and planning and to be short, sweet and to the point at the time of delivery. One second over the limit and you are disqualified and such were the rules of the contest.

This exercise in the art of condensing not only develops the students’ presentation and research communication skills, but also forces them to critically think about the core element of their research project and its importance for the broader community. The latter aspect most of the time escapes from the mind of our research students as they may have been peer promoted to consider the certificate and the convocation end point.

In today’s climate some may also savour the final Facebook uploads and the number of likes. It is important to break this developing psyche of wastefulness with the youth. As we have shown Sri Lanka has fewer researchers than elephants and this dangerous negative trend of initially not getting many scientists into research and then losing those who are engage in doing something to frivolity need to be countered and countered aggressively. SLAYS, you do have a role to play and that is why you are important!


Engaging positively, with society in mind

Late Indian President Abdul Kalam did spent best part of his presidency in wooing children and the young of India to engage positively and with society in mind. He once wrote targeting the youth: “I would like to ask you, what you would like to be remembered for? You should write it down. It could be an important contribution; whether it is an invention, an innovation or a change that you bring about in society that the nation will remember you for.”

This really is an important question. If our young scientists start with this question in mind or rather having first clearly answered the question in their mind imagine the possible transformation that is possible within the landscape.

Today much of the research work is confined to institutional four walls and even if they are presented you are more likely to see some abstracts in one’s own institutional conference. What 3MT Thesis actually indicated was that that there are quite important work going on but unless some change is initiated would just be limited to the student supervisor and closer peer group.

SLAYS not only exposed more than 75 research areas currently being carried out in the country in a blitz presentation format to an influential audience including politicians – the Minister of Science, Technology and Research was present early not just as the Chief Guest but also as a panellist listening to researcher woes and did listen to Shalini’s winning presentation on video. The public too will have the opportunity to listen to all the finalists via the SLAYS YouTube channel. There were quite a few promises made to the young scientists by the Minister and time will tell on delivery. It is also up to SLAYS to ensure that the dialogue that they created be kept alive. Sri Lanka perhaps holds the world record for starting all the right things but never sustaining most of them. The cost of abandoning is too high and on 1 March in the concluding session where SLAYS identified their forward march, many a good suggestion was made and some agreed upon too for action.

Inspiration was provided by Prof. Monte Cassim who hails from Japan at present who also is the Science Advisor to the Sri Lankan Prime Minister, when he invited all the researcher finalists to join the Japan Sri Lanka Innovation Forum. Both days the young were exposed to news on opportunities that they have and today they are all virtually connected too via COSTI’s Basecamp. A seasoned mountaineer may say from the basecamp to the summit is not just few steps but needs much resolve and courage. We believe that those researchers who were present on the day plus the SLAYS team had what it takes to achieve such.

9

Winning with research

In addition to the 3MT Thesis competition which I consider as the signature element, there were the international visitors – among them one of our own possible Nobel prospects, Prof. A.P. de Silva of University of Belfast – who made many presentations on winning with research. The agenda had been carefully crafted with the young researcher in mind.

As Prof. AP showed in his keynote presentation, ‘Science research is a worthwhile career: A Tale of Two once troubled cities,’ one needs to be strong on fundamentals and then pursue with imagination. Hope how he weaved magically the use of simple ideas into global products and global firsts was really understood by the young scientists present as the ideas were so powerful.

Well, it is quite clear that’s some elements that prevail in our system need some quick weeding out. Hope SLAYS will list them out and take on one by one in a determined manner. There is some serious dismantling to happen within our apparatus to herald in a stimulating research culture, without which the seeds for much-needed growth are difficult to happen.

On the day there were the observing minds impressed by the way the event had been organised and executed. SLAYS, do not allow yourselves to rest on your laurels after carrying out an event that even some of you may have believed to be impossible. It is up to the leadership at the helm, Dr. Taranga and her team, to ensure that you do not just plan the next event only thinking about the glory of the past one but having ensured some additional delivery by opening up frontiers for young scientists to engage and prosper. You may now have the top 10 issues facing the young scientist researchers of Sri Lanka and that is your list of things to do!

Sri Lanka: Chinaphobia — Solution or Delusion!

Chinese policies have been embedded into the local system over long period. To China, Sri Lanka is much more than a strategic island nation in the Indian Ocean to enhance its own power balance. Both parties “desire” lying with greater degree of responsibility.


by Nilantha Ilangamuwa- 
(March 14, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Many analysts and other concerned parties in diplomacy and international relations have started vowel war against the Chinese influence in the island nation Sri Lanka in recent past. One of many laughable factors of this highly motivated drama is those who clapped and appreciated China during the previous government, led by the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who went home two years prior to the completion of his term due to attachment to power, turned into harsh critiques of Chinese diplomacy with the current government.
Chinaphobiac statements by Indian, Japanese even some segments of the United States is a matter in conflict of interest, but how should Sri Lanka have to look at this? Sri Lanka as a debtor with huge amount of foreign debt, neither party is less important than the other, but the nation has the need to better articulated strategical approach to keep all of them in good relationships while protecting its own fundamental rights and market value of not only the ground but also the whole area of maritime. This will not be given priority in any agenda if the country’s economy is handled by a person who is smart in boasting nonsenses, but defaces in action based on acccountability and transparency.
There is however, no doubt that  the present ruling collation led by the President Maithripala Sirisena, is maintaining an “unclear policy” on China, but managing the situation without hurting each other, though Chinese envoy in Colombo is keeping a poker mood towards the government while in public domain. At the same time, some of the interested parties were in panic and tried to portrait the situation as alarming to the neighboring countries and other competitors.
However, the influence of Chinese policies is not new or limited to Sri Lanka. In fact, Chinese policies in restructuring many jurisdictions are moving faster than any other nation on the planet. Some called it “China debt trapped policy” while others may call it “Chinese colonization”, the diplomacy of the Chinese way of the ruling power has entered a new era, in which many corrupted policy makers in low-income countries are trying to find shelters under the Chinese umbrella. This has been earned nothing but addled reputation to Chinese policy. Mere investments and influencing the targeted countries by using most of corrupted subjects around the world may not last long and it will never win the heart and mind of the general public – which is made up of individuals with their own beliefs.
As far as the ground reality in Sri Lanka is concerned, it is delusional if someone urged Sri Lanka to sideline China. In fact, Chinese policies have been embedded into the local system over long period. To China, Sri Lanka is much more than a strategic island nation in the Indian Ocean to enhance its own power balance. Both parties “desire” lying with greater degree of responsibility.
Notwithstanding all this, China is facing two major challenges in its market economy. First is the authenticity of the local production as the rights of intellectual property has been evaporated.  Second, the most corrupted “policy makers” in many low income countries become trustworthy allies of China when it comes to investments. These major obstacles are producing bad taste in the system resulting in losing public trust.
But, China is taking “necessary steps” to sharpen its production and strengthen its reputation, though annulment of  labour rights and environmental issues such as air pollution, which Slavoj Žižek, a Slovenian philosopher and psychoanalyst termed as “airpocalypse”, are on high ground under the Communist Party rule. Those fundamental issues are creating the havoc. Those bottom lines are no longer isolated problems.
However, Chinaphobia is not the panacea to the very problems in the country, but it could give a chance to reengineer the diplomacy in bilateral and multilateral relationships. China is one on top of the list. Sri Lanka needs China, but how we need and what Sri Lanka can achieve in long term is the most important question.
You Decide!

Son-in-law’s company still vibrant in CB

Arjun Aloysius will buy Swarnawahini?
March 15, 2017
The turmoil created in the society by the fraudulent bond issues when Arjun Mahendran was the governor of Central Bank of Sri Lanka still remains while it has been established that Mahendran has acted in a manner that was advantageous for dealings with Perpetual Treasuries, a primary dealer company owned by his son-in-law Aloysius Mahendran.
It could be seen that the profits of Perpetual Treasuries Ltd. Owned by Aloysius Mahendran had increased that month by 500% when compared with that of the previous month.
Also, internal audit reports have confirmed that Arjun Mahendran had given Rs. 31,000 million from Central Bank funds to Aloysius Mahendran to buy bonds.
However, there is evidence present that, despite organizations against corruption in the country have demanded the administrative council including the Governor of Central Bank to remove Perpetual Treasuries Ltd. from the list of primary dealers, the corrupt company has not been removed from the list.
An advertisement published by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka indicates that Perpetual Treasuries has been included in an auction issuing bonds valued at Rs. 25000 million to be held on 15th March, 2017.
Avant Garde: Defence submits objections on maintainability of the inquiry


2017-03-15

The defence counsel today submitted their written objections to the maintainability of the inquiry in the Avant-Garde Maritime Security Services case in which former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Nisanka Senadhipathi and six others are charges with corruption by the Bribery Commission.

 The Bribery Commission had informed court that the suspects had committed an offence by permitting the Avant Garde Maritime Services to operate a floating armoury and thereby incurring a loss of Rs.11.4 billion to the state. 

The other six suspects are Sujatha Damayanthi, Palitha Piyasiri Fernando, Karunaratne Bandara Adhikarai, Somathilaka Dissanayake, Jayanath Sirikumara Colambage and Jayantha Perera. 

Subsequently, Colombo Chief Magistrate Lal RanasingheBandara directed the prosecution to submit their counter objections on this matter within two weeks. (Shehan Chamika Silva) 

Probe Against Perpetual Treasuries: Police On Snooze Mode


Colombo Telegraph
March 16, 2017
The Police appear to be on snooze mode despite a formal complaint seeking an investigation into Central Bank’s Primary Dealer Perpetual Treasuries for its alleged involvement in the Treasury Bond scam, committed during the tenure of ex-Governor Arjuna Mahendran, a close associate of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.
IGP Pujith
Highly placed sources claimed that a formal complaint was lodged by incumbent Governor of Central Bank Dr. Indrajit Coomaraswamy, who in a written complaint to Inspector General of Police (IGP) Pujith Jayasundara requested for an investigation against the primary dealer, with strong links to Arjun Aloysius, the son-in-law of Mahendran.
“But no serious steps have been taken to commence a police investigations against Perpetual Treasuries,” a source pointed out. In February Coomaraswamy instructed the IGP to carry out an investigation against the primary dealer, after the Monetary Board decided to curtail operations of the company which recorded a profit of Rs. 5.1 billion for the year ending March 2016, which was a 430 percent increase in profits in comparison to the company’s previous year’s performance. The bond scam was allegedly committed in 2015 and 2016.
But, the sources also pointed out that during the recent months officer of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) have been disgruntled due to various political meddling from the higher ups on certain high profile cases.
In September last year the Colombo Telegraph reported that the CID had decided to question former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa over the murder of ruggerite Wasim Thajudeen on grounds that a defender jeep used in the killing of the ruggerite had belonged to her charity group, Siriliya Saviya Foundation. However, it was subsequently reported that Wickremesinghe had intervened and ordered the CID not to question her. In November, President Maithripala Sirisena in an interview with the Sunday Times said that the Thajudeen case which is being investigated by the CID was suppressed. Two sons of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa have been accused of having a hand in the murder of the ruggerite.
Following the decision by the Monetary Board last month against Perpetual Treasuries, the company filed a write application at the Court of Appeal seeking an interim order restraining the Central Bank from taking action following the Board’s directive.

Nimal Lansa flees country to escape arrest!


Nimal Lansa flees country to escape arrest!

- Mar 15, 2017

Home affairs deputy minister Nimal Lansa has gone to live in Australia with his family due to the investigations against him by the CID and the FCID. Afraid that he would soon be arrested, he left the country even without informing parliament.

Lansa became controversial after the police raided his home for hidden narcotic drugs during the previous regime. Immediately after that raid, it was none of than the then executive president Mahinda Rajapaksa who went to see him, bringing him solace. Such was the ‘business’ and ‘political’ character of Lansa when he was a minister in the western provincial council.
After embracing the present ‘Yahapaalanaya’, he received a deputy ministerial portfolio, but the investigations against him did not stop. Therefore, he had been planning to leave the country, and he sold parts of his tourist hotels to Browns Company. Sources close to him, say Lansa had fled the country with the knowledge of Mahinda Rajapaksa to evade charges of drug dealing, black money and human trafficking to Australia. The ex-leader had told him, “We too, are finding the situation difficult. Now, we cannot do anything for you. Leave the country immediately.”
Lansa’s personal secretary Jeewanga confirmed all these details to Lanka News Web.

Landmark UN report backs Israel boycott


New UN report concludes that “Israel has established an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people as a whole” and calls for broad support of boycott movement.Ryan Rodrick BeilerActiveStills

Ali Abunimah- 15 March 2017

A new UN report offers explicit backing for the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign to end Israeli apartheid and support a just peace.

The landmark report’s endorsement of boycotts, economic sanctions and other grassroots initiatives comes at a moment when Israel is desperately attempting to criminalize and suppress international support for Palestinian rights.

Published by the UN’s Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the report concludes that “Israel has established an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people as a whole.”

It finds “beyond a reasonable doubt that Israel is guilty of policies and practices that constitute the crimes of apartheid” as defined in international law.

It urges national governments to “support boycott, divestment and sanctions activities and respond positively to calls for such initiatives.”

Racial regime

The UN report – “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid” – is not a comparison between Israel and apartheid South Africa, but an evaluation of Israel’s practices against the 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid and other key human rights laws.

The convention defines the crime of apartheid as “inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

International law defines racial discrimination to mean “any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent or ethnic or national origin,” the report notes.

The Zionist movement’s “claim to Palestine as the exclusive homeland of the Jewish people rests on an expressly racial conception of both groups,” the report states. “This means that Jews and Palestinians are ‘racial groups’ ” for the purposes of applying the apartheid convention.

“The mission of preserving Israel as a Jewish state has inspired or even compelled Israel to pursue several general racial policies,” the report says.

These include “demographic engineering, in order to establish and maintain an overwhelming Jewish majority in Israel.”

This encompasses the ethnic cleansing of almost 800,000 Palestinians in 1948, the denial of the right of return for Palestinian refugees and “a range of other policies designed to restrict the size of the Palestinian population.”

Although they can vote, the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel – about a fifth of the state’s citizens – are also systematically restricted, while full rights are granted only to Jews.

Meanwhile, Israel’s discriminatory “Law of Return” automatically grants citizenship to Jews from anywhere in the world, “while denying citizenship even to those Palestinians who have a documented history of residency in the country.”

Sham democracy

“As in any racial democracy,” the report argues, “such a majority allows the trappings of democracy – democratic elections, a strong legislature – without threatening any loss of hegemony by the dominant racial group.”

In a stark illustration of the racial logic espoused by Israel’s leadership, the country’s defense minister Avigdor Lieberman this week reiterated the view that the Jewish state should eventually be ethnically cleansed of virtually all Palestinians.

“There is no reason why Sheikh Raed Salah, Ayman Odeh, Basel Ghattas or Haneen Zoabi should continue to be Israeli citizens,” he said in reference to prominent Palestinian politicians, three of them members of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset.

Israel prohibits anyone from using its ostensibly democratic system to challenge the regime’s fundamentally racist set-up. Its Basic Law – the closest thing that Israel has to a written constitution – bars parties from running on a platform that explicitly or implicitly includes “negation of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.”

“Voting rights lose their significance in terms of equal rights when a racial group is legally banned from challenging laws that perpetuate inequality,” the report states. “Israeli law bans organized Palestinian opposition to Jewish domination, rendering it illegal and even seditious.”

This is not the first analysis to find that Israeli policies meet the legal definition of apartheid: a 2009 study by South Africa’s Human Sciences Research Council concluded that Israel practices apartheid in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.

But the new UN study goes much further, finding that Israel’s apartheid system dominates the entire Palestinian people. It concludes that the “strategic fragmentation” of the Palestinian people into separate territorial units and legal regimes – as citizens with limited rights within Israel, as stateless persons in the West Bank and Gaza, as “permanent residents” in East Jerusalem, or as refugees and exiles with no right of return – “is the principle method by which Israel imposes an apartheid regime.”

The 2009 study was overseen by political scientist Virginia Tilley. Tilley and the eminent professor of international law Richard Falk are co-authors of the new UN report.

Ending a “criminal enterprise”

Governments have a legal obligation to act immediately to end the crime of apartheid. This includes refusing to recognize an apartheid regime as lawful, refusing to aid a state in maintaining such a regime and cooperating with UN bodies and other states to end it.

The report urges UN bodies to act, and even suggests seeking a formal opinion from the International Court of Justice on Israel’s apartheid system. National governments should also back BDS and allow “criminal prosecutions of Israeli officials demonstrably connected with the practices of apartheid.”

But given that states and official bodies are not likely to take the lead, the report recognizes that “civil society institutions and individuals have a moral duty to use the instruments at their disposal to raise awareness of this ongoing criminal enterprise.”

They must use these tools to “exert pressure on Israel to dismantle apartheid structures and negotiate in good faith for a lasting peace that acknowledges the rights of Palestinians under international law and makes it possible for the two peoples to live together on the basis of real equality.”

Transnational movement

Recalling an earlier era, the report notes that research and legal analyses by UN bodies – such as the United Nations Center Against Apartheid – were critical resources for civil society activists in their efforts aimed at “legitimating boycott, divestments and sanctions, and contributing to the overall formation of a transnational movement against apartheid in South Africa.”

One of the report’s key aims today is to encourage “practical measures in accordance with international law to exert pressure on Israel to dismantle its apartheid regime.”

“Efforts should be made to broaden support for boycott, divestment and sanctions initiatives among civil society actors,” the report recommends.

Private sector firms should be “reminded of their legal, moral and political responsibility to sever ties with commercial ventures and projects that directly or indirectly aid and abet the apartheid regime.”

All of this confirms the reasoning and tactics of the Palestinian-led BDS movement – support for which even the staunchly pro-Israel European Union has belatedly recognized as a democratic right.

I survived the Aleppo siege, but in Turkey, death still chases me

As the Syrian war enters its seventh year, Mojahed Abu al-Jood recounts his flight from Aleppo and his perilous journey into Turkey with smugglers--Displaced Syrians at a shelter in the neighbourhood of Jibrin, east of Aleppo on 1 December 2016 (AFP)
AFP)

Migrants wait with life vests while they are camping after being cheated by smugglers in Canakkale on 

29 January 2016(AFP) Mojahed Abu al-Jood-Wednesday 15 March 2017 07:45 UTC
“The regime army is close to us.” This is what they said to us the whole way. We could not tell them to let us go back. We asked them, “Who are you? Where are we going?” The answer was always: “Shut up and don’t say a word!”
House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Ranking Democrat Adam Schiff (Calif.) expressed doubt, March 15, about President Trump's claim of a 2016 wire tap at Trump Tower. (Reuters)


 
Update: Nunes made another big statement about Trump's claim Wednesday, saying at a press conference that "clearly the president was wrong” if he meant literally that President Obama had wiretapped him. Nunes, it bears emphasizing, served on Trump's transition team.

It's almost as though Republicans are tired of having President Trump's evidence-free allegations laid at their feet. Almost.

Late Monday, a spokesman for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) threatened to subpoena the Trump administration to produce evidence of Trump's claim that President Barack Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign. The White House has declined to produce this evidence publicly, offering various excuses, including the Constitution's separation of powers and — most recently on Monday — arguing that Trump wasn't speaking literally when he made the claim.

The Justice Department missed Nunes's deadline to provide evidence Monday, which drew Nunes's subpoena threat.

The House of Representatives intelligence committee will hold an open hearing on March 20 on the investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, the committee's chairman, Devin Nunes, said on March 7. (Reuters)

“If the committee does not receive a response, the committee will ask for this information during the March 20 hearing and may resort to a compulsory process if our questions continue to go unanswered,”
 Nunes spokesman Jack Langer said.

Then, on Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) made his own threat. Last week, Graham — who is clearly skeptical of the wiretapping claim and chairs a subcommittee looking into it — asked the Justice Department and the FBI to provide copies of any warrants or court orders related to the alleged wiretapping. Having not received anything, Graham said he may push for a special committee.

“They're about to screw up big time if they keep running to the intel committee and not answer that letter,” Graham said, according to CBS's Alan He. He added: “If they don't honor this request and give us an answer, then I would say that we need a joint select committee because regular order is not working.”

On Wednesday morning, Graham said he might also go the subpoena route and hold up deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein's nomination. "Congress is gonna flex its muscle here, and you see that all over the place," Graham said.


01

logoWednesday, 15 March 2017

“What is true, just and beautiful is not determined by popular vote. The masses everywhere are ignorant, short-sighted, motivated by envy and easy to fool. Democratic politicians must appeal to these masses in order to be elected. Whoever is the best demagogue will win. Almost by necessity, then, democracy will lead to the perversion of truth, justice and beauty” – Hans-Hermann Hoppe
Bill and Hillary Clinton are a talented couple, cerebral and accomplished. Though seemingly removed from active politics, their potential to earn as recognisable public figures and intellectuals is still growing.

During the recently concluded presidential campaign, Goldman Sachs paid a sizeable amount to Hillary Clinton not because she was corrupt or dribbling for dough but that’s how campaigns are financed in the US and to a larger extent in other countries where this typhlotic political system of democracy holds sway.

In the US, direct campaign donors are legally allowed to interact with a candidate but their donations cannot exceed $ 2,700 per presidential candidate. By the way, US federal election law requires all candidates to report each campaign donation to the Federal Election Committee.

In these civilised times, ruled by extremely civilised people, hideous amounts are thrown around by big businesses in a casino type fashion at the favourite candidates during the so-called democratic elections. This is being done in sharp contravention to the fundamental tenets of an actual functioning democracy. Democracy is essentially western; a supposedly guiding western idea, in exponential decay and regression, due to the influence of big money.

03
Today businesses not only place their bets by mere mutual lubrication with political candidates but drape their wives in plush jewellery, purchase them fancy gifts, sponsor the education of their children overseas, the list goes on. The unwritten principle of tacit reciprocity between big business and political elites is sealed and integral to the enlightened democracy of today. This crass distortion is unfair and unjust. It disunites and dislocates the preponderance in whose name ironically the entire political philosophy hinges.

In the context of the civil war, Lincoln memorialised the sacrifices and ensured the survival of America’s representative democracy. He famously said: “Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish.” Maybe Lincoln was not affected much by the political influence of Wall Street.

Distortions only facilitate a futile and meaningless engagement of the people in a democracy, depriving the attendant and intended benefits of a system that once performed true to its revered theory. Today the process is an absolute mockery and travesty. The ordinary Joe is wholly emasculated and rendered unequal due to the powers vested in a few who are able to engineer varied and multicoloured distortions courtesy of big bucks.

Deception and misrepresentation are juxtapositions to a functioning democracy. H.L. Mencken said it best: “I confess I enjoy democracy immensely. It is incomparably idiotic and hence incomparably amusing.” Hans-Hermann Hoppe, a German-born American Austrian School economist and libertarian anarcho-capitalist philosopher, was right when he said: “Whoever is the best demagogue will win. Almost by necessity, then, democracy will lead to the perversion of truth, justice and beauty.”

Without big bucks from crude corporate capitalists, actual combustion will cease. The Asian counterparts are always incidentally a step ahead. For sure they’ll need big notes and in huge quantities due to inflation and the devaluation of currency, also armed vehicles and soldiers to transport it and dangle them in front of uncouth politicians willing to attempt the pole vault. They rake and stash in style.

In South Asia in particular it is a refined art worthy of a serious PhD dissertation, executed with skill, subtlety and sophistication. A plethora of front men, fake companies and the much maligned offshore accounts. Even for the untainted, the temptation is too much to resist. Smart and smooth-talking wizards and loyalists with MBAs working in tandem as ideal proxies, adopting a more respectable modus operandi to embezzle and contribute towards mutual growth. This is how the political game is played wherever democracy reigns. This cannot be changed and will not be changed. Democracy Zindabad! Democracy Zindabad!

Communicating with a multicultural audience not necessarily endowed with the same degree of intelligence and insight is certainly not an ordinary task. The process is further compounded when one has to rebut Opposition allegations. All of this involves money and lots of it. Preparing for an election in these civilised times is no mean task.Smart and veteran contenders habitually contrive sensational hype, pregnant with insincerity, mendacity and deceit, energised by high voltage electricity supplied via Madison Avenue only to be devalued as damp squibs once the protagonists enter office, with the non-implementation of election pledges, assurances and commitments. Going against universal principles, attacking minorities, killing with impunity, etc. takes center stage soon after. We will soon hear from Donald J. Trump, not to mention the countless promises given by Sri Lankan politicians that once included nourishment for lactating mothers and unweaned toddlers. These children, if amongst the living, must be just over 10 years today. Step into any night ‘Appa Kade’ and you will hear the common man’s voice. As one put it ‘Unta Kotiprokotiapata Loonuala ha Paanpiti’ – meaning politicians make millions and control the price of red onions, potato and flour to prevent a middle-class uprising.

In the meantime, someone has apparently told Joe that he is the unmistakable king in a democracy. He is in fact enraged and agitated and behaving more like King Kong.

The history of democracy globally is strewn with examples of extremists in every shape or form and demagogues manipulating prejudice, insecurity and fear in a bid for power. In this sense, Trump is not the first and his rhetoric is certainly nothing new.

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow announced she had obtained two pages of President Trump's 2005 tax return. Here's what (little) it shows. (Gillian Brockell/The Washington Post)

 

President Trump paid $38 million in federal taxes in 2005 on income of $153 million and reported a $105 million write-down in business losses, according to a copy of his 

Trump paid an effective tax rate of 24 percent and saved millions of dollars in additional taxes by claiming the losses, according to the document, the first two pages of which were obtained by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston and first reported by DC Report, a nonprofit news site he runs, and on MSNBC's “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

The return shows that Trump paid $36.5 million in income tax, of which about $31 million was in the form of an “alternative minimum tax,” a supplemental tax designed to cut down on filers with excessive deductions. He also paid about $1.5 million in Medicare and Social Security taxes.

The document offers a rare snapshot of Trump’s personal finances, considering he has refused to disclose his tax returns to the public. The White House issued a statement chastising MSNBC for reporting on Trump’s taxes — “totally illegal,” read the statement — but also confirming top-line numbers from the return and defending Trump.

Still, Trump tweeted early Wednesday that the report was "FAKE NEWS" and asked: "Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, 'went to his mailbox' and found my tax returns?"
Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, "went to his mailbox" and found my tax returns? @NBCNews FAKE NEWS!
Trump’s taxes were a major flash point in last year’s campaign and continue to be a subject of intense scrutiny from Democrats and others who believe they would show whether he has financial relationships with any Russian entities.

The newly revealed pages from his 2005 return do not detail his financial ties, but they do seem to disprove the theory that some Democrats advanced in last year’s campaign that Trump avoided paying any federal income taxes during that period.

In their first general-election debate, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton speculated about Trump, “maybe he doesn’t want the American people — all of you watching tonight — to know that he’s paid nothing in federal taxes.” At that, Trump quipped, “That makes me smart.”

Donald Trump Jr., the president’s oldest son, tweeted, “Thank you Rachel Maddow for proving to your #Trump hating followers how successful @realDonaldTrump is& that he paid $40mm in taxes! #Taxes”

Last fall, the New York Times revealed that Trump reported a massive $916 million loss in 1995, which he could have carried over to allow him to offset taxable income and avoid paying income taxes for up to 18 years. Though Trump was able to use those net losses as a deduction in 2005, the returns show, they did not zero out his tax obligation altogether.

Trump used real estate deductions to pay no federal income taxes in 1978 and 1979, according to Trump tax returns submitted years ago to New Jersey regulators. Much of those losses came from a deduction offered to real estate developers, like Trump, allowing them to subtract from their income on the basis that buildings depreciate in value over time.

Trump could have used a dubious tactic called a 'stock-for-debt' swap to avoid paying taxes on as much as $916 million in income for years. Here's how that works. Editor's note: This video was originally published Oct. 3, 2016. (Daron Taylor/The Washington Post)

Trump repeatedly has refused to release his income tax returns — breaking with four decades of tradition for presidential nominees — claiming that he has been under audit and that his lawyers have counseled him not to release them.

The Internal Revenue Service has not confirmed that it is auditing Trump’s taxes.

The Washington Post could not independently verify the 2005 return, but a statement from the White House indicated that it is authentic. The statement, issued to reporters anonymously to be attributed to a White House spokesperson, accused MSNBC of unlawfully releasing Trump’s tax returns.

“You know you are desperate for ratings when you are willing to violate the law to push a story about two pages of tax returns from over a decade ago,” the statement said. It added that Trump, as “one of the most successful businessmen in the world,” paid “no more tax than legally required.”

The statement went on to say: “Mr. Trump paid $38 million dollars even after taking into account large scale depreciation for construction, on an income of more than $150 million dollars, as well as paying tens of millions of dollars in other taxes such as sales and excise taxes and employment taxes and this illegally published return proves just that. Despite this substantial income figure and tax paid, it is totally illegal to steal and publish tax returns. The dishonest media can continue to make this part of their agenda, while the President will focus on his, which includes tax reform that will benefit all Americans.”

The tax documents were sent to Johnston, a veteran investigative reporter who specializes in taxes and formerly worked at the New York Times. He speculated on air to Maddow that Trump himself may have sent him the returns.

The return shows Trump and wife Melania paid most of their income taxes as an alternative minimum tax. Taxpayers requesting many itemized deductions must pay the AMT in certain circumstances. The AMT rejects specific deductions, including for dependents and assorted real estate write-downs. In his tax-reform plan, Trump has called for eliminating the AMT.

The return shows that Trump’s business income in 2005 totaled roughly $42 million, with capital gains from investments totaling roughly $32 million and income from partnerships, trusts and so-called “S corporations” totaling roughly $67 million.

Trump used roughly $103 million in net operating losses, carried over from previous years, to greatly lower that tax obligation. Trump also used such losses, likely from a series of costly business failures and Atlantic City bankruptcies, to lower his tax bill in 1995.

Trump has routinely taken pride in his aggressive working of the nation’s tax laws.

“I have brilliantly used those laws,” Trump said at a campaign event in October. “I was able to use the tax laws of this country, and my business acumen, to dig out of the real estate mess — you would call it a depression — when few others were able to do what I did.”

Trump’s reported income in 2005 may call into question his net worth. Trump says he is now worth more than $10 billion, but independent estimators have said that figure may be overstated. In 2005, Trump said he was worth more than $5 billion.

Trump sued author Timothy O’Brien after his 2005 book, “TrumpNation,” cited anonymous sources suggesting Trump was instead worth $150 to $250 million. In depositions from that case, O’Brien’s attorneys revealed estimates from two lenders to Trump, North Fork Bank and Deutsche Bank, who suggested Trump’s net worth was between $800 million and $1.2 billion.

Trump’s current finances are set to face a new test with the coming April 18 tax deadline. He has steadfastly refused to release his returns, pointing both to ongoing audits and to his belief that Americans do not care to see them. However, a Pew Research Center survey in January found that 60 percent of Americans believe that Trump has a responsibility to release his returns.

All U.S. presidents are automatically audited every year, as prescribed by a guideline in the Internal Revenue Service manual in place for presidents and vice presidents since the 1970s. Trump could urge Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to change that provision, legal experts said. Trump has not said whether he would do so.